毋忘五大訴求 公民抗命有理
—10‧20九龍遊行陳情書
(案件編號:DCCC 535/2020)
——————————————————
「毋忘初衷,活在愛和真實之中」
撐阿銘,即訂閱Patreon:
patreon.com/raphaelwong
—————————————————
胡法官雅文閣下:
2012年,我第一次站在法庭上承認違反「公安惡法」,述說對普選的盼望,批評公安惡法不義,並因公民抗命的緣故,甘心樂意接受刑罰。當年我說,如果小圈子選舉沒有被廢除,惡法沒有消失,我依然會一如故我,公民抗命,並且我相信將會有更多學生和市民加入這個行列。想不到時至今日,普選仍然遙遙無期,我亦再次被帶到法庭接受審判,但只是短短7年,已經有數十萬計的群眾公民抗命,反對暴政。今日,我承認違反「未經批准的政府」所訂立「未經批准的惡法」之下的「未經批准集結」罪,我不打算尋求法庭的憐憫,但請容許我佔用法庭些微時間陳情,讓法庭在判刑前有全面考慮。
暴力之濫觴
在整個反修例運動如火如荼之際,我正承擔另一宗公民抗命案件的刑責。雖然身在獄中,但仍然心繫手足。我在獄中電視機前見證6月9日、6月16日及8月18日三次百萬港人大遊行,幾多熱愛和平的港人冒天雨冒彈雨走上街頭,抗議不義惡法,今日關於10月20日的案件,亦是如此。可能有人會問,政府已在6月暫緩修例,更在9月正式撤回修例,我等仍然繼續示威,豈非無理取鬧?我相信法官閣下肯定聽過「遲來的正義並非正義」(Justice delayed is justice denied)這句格言。當過百萬群眾走上街頭,和平表達不滿的時候,林鄭政府沒有理睬,反而獨行獨斷,粗暴踐踏港人的意願,結果製造出後來連綿不絕的爭拗,甚至你死我活的對抗。經歷眾多衝突痛苦之後,所謂暫緩撤回,已經微不足道,我們只是更加清楚:沒有民主,就連基本人權都不會擁有!
在本案之中,雖然我們都沒有鼓動或作出暴力行為,但根據早前8‧18及10‧1兩宗案件,相信在控方及法庭眼中,案發當日的暴力事件仍然可以算在我們頭上,如此,我有必要問:如果香港有一個公平正義的普及選舉,人民可以在立法會直接否決他們不認可的法律,試問2019年的暴力衝突可以從何而來呢?如果我們眼見的暴力是如此十惡不赦,那麼我們又如何看待百萬人遊行後仍然堅持推行惡法的制度暴力呢?如果我們不能接受人民暴力反抗,那麼我們是否更加不能對更巨大更壓逼的制度暴力沈默不言?真正且經常發生的暴力,是漠視人民訴求的暴力,是踐踏人民意見的暴力,是剝奪人民表達權利的暴力。真正憎恨暴力,痛恨暴力的人,不可能一方面指摘暴力反抗,又容忍制度暴力。如果我需要承擔和平遊行引發出來的暴力事件的刑責,那麼誰應該承擔施政失敗所引發出來的社會騷亂的罪責呢?
社會之病根
對於法庭而言,可能2019年所發生的事情只是一場社會騷亂,務必追究違法者個人責任。然而,治亂治其本源,醫病醫其病根,我雖然公民抗命,刻意違法,控方把我帶上法庭,但我卻不應被理解為一個「犯罪個體」。2019年所發生的事情,並不是我一個人或我們這幾位被告可以促成,社會問題的癥結不是「犯罪份子」本身,而是「犯罪原因」。我明白「治亂世用重典」的道理,但如果「殺雞儆猴」是解決方法,就不會在2016年發生旺角騷亂及2017年上訴庭對示威者施以重刑後,2019年仍然會爆發出更大規模的暴力反抗。
如果不希望社會動亂,就必須正本清源,逐步落實「五大訴求」,從根本上改革,挽回民心。2019年反修例運動,其實只是2014年雨傘運動的延續而已,縱使法庭可能認為兩個運動皆是「一股歪風」所引起,但我必須澄清,兩個運動的核心就是追求民主普選,人民當家作主。在2019年11月24日區議會選舉這個最類近全民普選的選舉中,接近300萬人投票,民主派大勝,奪得17個區議會主導權,這就是整個反修例運動的民意,民意就是反對政府決策,反對制度暴力,反對推行惡法,不容爭辯,不辯自明。我們作為礦場裡的金絲雀,多次提醒政府撤回修法,並從根本上改革制度,而在10月20日的九龍遊行當然是反映民意的平台契機。如今,法庭對我們施加重刑,其實只不過是懲罰民意,將金絲雀困在鳥籠之內,甚至扼殺於鼓掌之中,窒礙表達自由。
堅持之重要
大運動過後的大鎮壓,使我們失去《蘋果日報》,失去教協,失去民陣,不少民主派領袖以及曾為運動付出的手足戰友都囚於獄中,不少曾經熱情投入運動的朋友亦因《國安法》的威脅轉為低調,新聞自由示威自由日漸萎縮,公民社會受到沈重打擊,我亦失去不少摯友,有感傷孤獨的時候,但我仍然相信,2019年香港人的信念,以及所展現人類的光輝持久未變。我不會忘記百萬人民冒雨捱熱抗拒暴政,抵制惡法,展現我們眾志成城;我不會忘記人潮紅海,讓道救護車,展現我們文明精神;我不會忘記年青志士直接行動反對苛政,捨身成仁,展現我們膽色勇氣;我不會忘記銀髮一族走上街頭保護年青人,展現我們彼此關懷;我不會忘記「五大訴求」,不會忘記2019年區議會選舉,展現我們有理有節。
法官閣下,我對於當日的所作所為,不感羞恥,毫無悔意。我能夠在出獄後與群眾同行一路,與戰友同繫一獄,實是莫大榮幸。若法治失去民主基石,將使法庭無奈地接受專制政權所訂立解釋的法律限制,隨時變成政治工具掃除異見,因此爭取民主普選,建設真正法治,追求公平正義,仍然是我的理想。在這條路上,如有必要,我仍然會公民抗命,正如終審法院海外非常任法官賀輔明(Lord Hoffmann)所言,發自良知的公民抗命有悠久及光榮的傳統,歷史將證明我們是正確的。我期望,曾與我一起遊行抗命的手足戰友要堅持信念,在艱難歲月裡毋忘初衷,活在愛和真實之中。
最後,如9年前一樣,我想借用美國民權領袖馬丁路德金牧師的一番話對我們的反對者說:「我們將以自己忍受苦難的能力,來較量你們製造苦難的能力。我們將用我們靈魂的力量,來抵禦你們物質的暴力。對我們做你們想做的事吧,我們仍然愛你們。我們不能憑良心服從你們不公正的法律,因為拒惡與為善一樣是道德責任。將我們送入監獄吧,我們仍然愛你們。」(We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you.)
願慈愛的主耶穌賜我們平安,與我和我一家同在,與法官閣下同在,與香港人同在。沒有暴徒,只有暴政;五大訴求,缺一不可!願榮耀歸上帝,榮光歸人民!
第五被告
黃浩銘
二零二一年八月十九日
Lest we forget the five demands: civil disobedience is morally justified
- Statement on 10‧20 Kowloon Rally
(Case No.: DCCC 535/2020)
Your Honour Judge Woodcock
In 2012, I stood before the court and admitted to violating the "Public Security Evil Law". I expressed my hope for universal suffrage, criticized the evil law as unjust, and willingly accepted the penalty for civil disobedience. Back then, I said that if the small-circle election had not been abolished and the draconian law had not disappeared, I would still be as determined as I was, and I believe that more students and citizens would join this movement. Today, universal suffrage is still a long way off, and I have been brought before the court again for trial. But in just seven years, hundreds of thousands of people have already risen up in civil disobedience against tyranny. Today, I plead guilty to "unauthorised assembly" under an unapproved evil law enacted by an unauthorised government. I do not intend to seek the court's mercy, but please allow me to take up a little time in court to present my case so that the court can consider all aspects before sentencing me.
The roots of violence
At the time when the whole anti-extradition law movement was in full-swing, I was taking responsibility for another civil disobedience case. Although I was in prison, my heart was still with the people. I witnessed the three million-person rallies on 9 June, 16 June and 18 August on television in prison, when many peace-loving people took to the streets despite the rain and bullets, to protest against unjust laws. Some people may ask, "The Government has already suspended the legislative amendments in June and formally withdrew the bill in September, but we are still demonstrating, are we not being unreasonable?" I am sure your Honour has heard of the adage "Justice delayed is justice denied". When more than a million people took to the streets to express their discontent peacefully, the Lam administration ignored them and instead acted arbitrarily, brutally trampling on the wishes of the people of Hong Kong, resulting in endless arguments and even confrontations. After so many conflicts and painful experiences, the so-called moratorium is no longer meaningful. We only know better: without democracy, we cannot even have basic human rights!
In this case, although we did not instigate or commit acts of violence, I believe that in the eyes of the prosecution and the court, the violence on the day of the incident can still be counted against us, based on the August 18 and October 1 case. And now I must ask - If Hong Kong had a fair and just universal election, and the public could directly veto laws they did not approve of at the Legislative Council, then how could the violent clashes of 2019 have come about? If the violence we see is so heinous, how do we feel about the institutional violence that insists on the imposition of draconian laws even after millions of people have taken to the streets? If we cannot accept violent rebellion, how can we remain silent in the face of even greater and more oppressive institutional violence? The true and frequent violence is the kind of violence that ignores people's demands, that tramples on their opinions, that deprives them of their right to express themselves. People who truly hate violence and abhor it cannot accuse violent resistance on the one hand and tolerate institutional violence on the other. If I have to bear the criminal responsibility for the violence caused by the peaceful demonstration, then who should bear the criminal responsibility for the social unrest caused by failed administration?
The roots of society's problems
From a court's point of view, it may be that what happened in 2019 was just a series of social unrest, and that those who broke the law must be held personally accountable. What happened in 2019 was not something that I alone or the defendants could have made possible, and the crux of the social problem was not the 'criminals' but the 'causes of crime'. I understand the concept of " applying severe punishment to a troubled world", but if "decimation" was really the solution, there would not have been more violent rebellions in 2019 after the Mongkok "riot" in 2016 and the heavy sentences handed down to protesters by the Court of Appeal in 2017.
If we do not want social unrest, we must get to the root of the problem and implement the "five demands" step by step, so as to achieve fundamental reforms and win back the hearts of the people. 2019's anti-revision movement is indeed a continuation of 2014's Umbrella Movement, and even though the court may think that both movements are caused by a "perverse wind", I must clarify that the core of both movements is the pursuit of democracy and universal suffrage, and the people being the masters of their own house. In the District Council election on 24 November 2019, which is the closest thing to universal suffrage, nearly 3 million people voted, and the democratic camp won a huge victory, winning majority in 17 District Councils. As canaries in the monetary coal mine, we have repeatedly reminded the government to withdraw the extradition bill and fundamentally reform the system, and the march in Kowloon on 20 October was certainly an opportunity to reflect public opinion. Now, by imposing heavy penalties on us, the court is only punishing public opinion, trapping the canaries in a birdcage, or even stifling them in the palm of their hands, suffocating the freedom of expression.
The importance of persistence
As a result of the crackdown after the mass movement, we lost Apple Daily, the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, and the Civil Human Rights Front. Many of our democratic leaders and comrades who had contributed to the movement were imprisoned, and many of our friends who had been passionately involved in the movement had been forced to lay low under the threat of the National Security Law. I still believe that the faith of Hong Kong people and the glory of humanity seen in 2019 will remain unchanged. I will never forget the millions of people who braved the rain and the heat to resist tyranny and evil laws, demonstrating our unity of purpose; I will never forget the crowds of people who gave way to ambulances, demonstrating our civility; I will never forget the young people who sacrificed their lives, demonstrating our courage and bravery; I will never forget the silver-haired who took to the streets to protect the youth, demonstrating our care for each other; I will never forget the "five demands" and the 2019 District Council election, demonstrating our rationality and decency.
Your Honour, I have nothing to be ashamed of and no remorse for what I did on that day. It is my great honour to be in prison with my comrades and to be able to walk with the public after my release. If the rule of law were to lose its democratic foundation, the courts would have no choice but to accept the legal restrictions set by the autocratic regime and become a political tool to eliminate dissent at any time. As Lord Hoffmann, a non-permanent overseas judge of the Court of Final Appeal, said, civil disobedience from the conscience has a long and honourable tradition, and history will prove us right. I hope that my comrades in arms who walked with me in protests will keep their faith and live in love and truth in the midst of this difficult time.
Finally, as I did nine years ago, I would like to say something to those who oppose us, borrowing the words of American civil rights leader Reverend Martin Luther King: "We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you."
Peace be with me and my family, with Your Honour, and with the people of Hong Kong. There are no thugs, only tyranny; five demands, not one less! To god be the glory and to people be the glory!
The Fifth Defendant
Wong Ho Ming
19 August 2021
同時也有8部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過6萬的網紅高松傑高Sir正能量,也在其Youtube影片中提到,【笑爆】美國風景真美麗!沒有暴徒只有暴政?黄絲手足撐邊個?從40萬新登記選民分析9月選情| 高Sir正能量 02062020 1. 美國黑人事件引爆及持續發酵,多處出現"和平示威"活動,美國曾經形容香港黑暴期間的暴力示威係「美麗風景線」,依家「美麗風景線」在美國上演了? 2. 沒有暴徒只有暴政...
「只有暴政」的推薦目錄:
- 關於只有暴政 在 黃浩銘 Raphael Wong Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於只有暴政 在 Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於只有暴政 在 黃浩銘 Raphael Wong Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於只有暴政 在 高松傑高Sir正能量 Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於只有暴政 在 香港花生 Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於只有暴政 在 黃偉民易經講堂 Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於只有暴政 在 #沒有暴徒只有暴政 - Explore | Facebook 的評價
- 關於只有暴政 在 【聲援香港】在民主社會中,沒有暴民,只有暴政 - YouTube 的評價
- 關於只有暴政 在 #沒有暴徒 #只有暴政 | Fight for freedom, Hong kong, Yellow ... 的評價
- 關於只有暴政 在 《無架構的暴政》一文重點整理 - gists · GitHub 的評價
- 關於只有暴政 在 兩岸準備和解?蔡英文喊「願與北京對話」朱立倫笑酸這句話 的評價
只有暴政 在 Facebook 的最讚貼文
死婆呀 講得真係好
『不要被只有暴政 沒有暴力謬論蒙騙』
咁即係『又有暴政 又有暴力』???
我覺得d牧者真係要小心評估下身邊d年輕人
連中年老年都要睇清楚
尤其係個d話自己係天主教 又受上帝感召
之後又去林村擲寶牒
做咩呀 出左上帝出左新樹咩?定突然鍾意左食橙呀?
又會去佛誕祈福
呢個世代好多人假借信教之名 洗白自己
必須向教會舉報 趕佢出街
只有暴政 在 黃浩銘 Raphael Wong Facebook 的最佳解答
【全民黑衣,七一表態!】
村長今晚在旺角東天橋職工盟街站上表示希望香港人仍然能藉七‧一表達意見,全民黑衣,抗議政權政治檢控,要求釋放政治犯!
影片來源[香江望神州]:
https://youtu.be/R1LhCI95jcY
#五大訴求缺一不可
#沒有暴徒只有暴政
#釋放所有政治犯
只有暴政 在 高松傑高Sir正能量 Youtube 的最佳解答
【笑爆】美國風景真美麗!沒有暴徒只有暴政?黄絲手足撐邊個?從40萬新登記選民分析9月選情| 高Sir正能量 02062020
1. 美國黑人事件引爆及持續發酵,多處出現"和平示威"活動,美國曾經形容香港黑暴期間的暴力示威係「美麗風景線」,依家「美麗風景線」在美國上演了?
2. 沒有暴徒只有暴政?美國黑警點執法?黄絲手足撐邊個?黄政棍去咗邊。
3. 談美國制裁眼濕濕? 陳茂波親自解畫。
4. 何啟明(6月1日)履新勞福局副局長,
5. 【我是中國人】大桃戰⁉️
6. 萬眾期待,save hk約定你6月6號,晚上8點,一齊為慈善出力救救香港。大會將會為樂童行和香港單親協會籌款幫助有需要的人,網友可以直接捐款給慈善機構並會日內公佈詳情及所有直播頻道。快啲話俾所有正常人知!到時見!
高Sir 創作2金句支持國安法
平生不作叛國事
國安立法唔駛驚
國安立法 人人有責
唔係漢奸 使乜害怕
*支持國安法 & 守護香港 做個醒目選民至掂檔活動*
因為我們今年非常嚴峻 ,我們建設力量目標要保住35+ ,所以我們一班KOL發起!團結就是力量!希望大家配合支持。
請參與行動: https://forms.gle/Z4sMNs4srLrtE7pMA
#小市民憑良心
#做實事講真相
#男人幫大聯盟
#KOL100
#青年快閃社區清潔大行動
#人間記者會
#青年護旗手
——————————————————
五星正能量? 真係爆哂燈?
請大家幫幫手:
1. 訂閱「高松傑 - 高Sir正能量」youtube 頻道 (訂閱係免費架) https://youtube.com/jackyko1109 ;
2. 撳?搶先睇
3. 贊好並留言支持;
4. 將影片分享開去。
![post-title](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TcIA7FVGfuU/hqdefault.jpg)
只有暴政 在 香港花生 Youtube 的精選貼文
主持:Roger, Kevin, Penny
把花生留住,請付費支持:轉賬至滙豐銀行 023-280233-838,抬頭 HONG KONG INTERNET RADIO LIMITED
花生網頁: www.hkpeanuts.com
PayPal 付款賬號: hkangrypeanut@gmail.com
FB專頁: https://www.facebook.com/hkpeanuts/
![post-title](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/pBNUrC621sM/hqdefault.jpg)
只有暴政 在 黃偉民易經講堂 Youtube 的最讚貼文
粉身碎骨、壽終正寢、玉石俱焚,林鄭愛用的四字成語只能欺騙文盲。有記者問:「林太,好多市民問你幾時#?」變相戒嚴,政府放手,警察管治。林鄭作為公僕,狂妄的說我們have no stake in the society。林鄭政府誠信破產,警隊變惡棍,黑衣扮臥底,擲磚掟汽油彈,放火,塗污中聯辦、中共國徽,帶頭衝擊,栽贓嫁禍…… 黑警濫捕,年輕人血濺街頭,含冤入獄,但上街的人,愈來愈多,沒有畏懼。(完整文字版將會在節目後上載至易經講堂網頁)
#811衝突 #黑警 #爆眼 #催淚彈 #送中 #中聯辦 #林鄭#官警黑 #逃犯條例 #香港
==========
如若你喜歡「易經講堂」節目,覺得內容有益世道人心,希望你能繼續收看、讚好、「訂閱及推介」易經講堂YouTube頻道,集腋可以成裘,謝謝支持與鼓勵。
易經講堂有限公司
香港上環郵政局郵政信箱33249號
I Ching Consultancy Limited
Sheung Wan Post Office P.O. Box 33249, 1/F West Exchange Tower, 322-324 Des Voeux Road Central, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong
網頁 Website: https://wmwong730.wordpress.com/gift
電郵 Gmail: IChingConsultancyLtd
==========
Wong Wai Man 2019年8月13日 星期二下午5:00
林鄭作為一個公僕,竟然狂妄的說我們have no stake in the society.
面對香港民怨,她選擇了與民為敵。
由始至終,她沒有解決問題的心,她便宜方便的拿了北京的說法,「香港年輕人,背後有大台,有外國勢力在主使,他們不是反修例,他們在革命,他們搞港獨。」
她是土生土長的香港人,她自己心裡明白,她是埋沒良心!
《周易》第六卦,是天水訟卦。
從小時候家人爭用廁所,到學校內的爭執,公司社會上的是非,國與國之間的資源勢力爭訟,都無口無之。
官民爭訟,更是幾千年來中華文化的主要課題。民為邦本,民貴君輕,這類智慧,是幫助為政者,面對社會的矛盾。
《訟卦.大象傳》說:
天與水違行,訟。
君子以作事謀始。
天與水違行。天,往上走;水,往下流。這就是訟卦的象。
違行,是無法合作,互相消耗。
這個時候,《大象傳》提醒我們:君子以作事謀始。
君子,一個了不起的人,一個政治領袖,見到訟卦的象,便先要設法化解。
做任何事,尤其做大事,都應該「謀始」。
香港發展成今日的局面,為政者,應從最根本想起,想解決方法。
便宜的說一句,「背後有外國勢力」;或者傲慢的說「they have no stake in the society.」就解決了問題?
對得住你的職銜?
對得住你的工資?
對得住你的良心?
你晚間睡得著?
《訟卦卦辭》:
訟,有孚。窒惕,中吉,終凶。
利見大人,不利涉大川。
開宗明義第一句是:有孚。
孚字,是母鳥孵蛋之象。母親用體溫孕育自己兒女成長,心意至誠。有孚,是在雙方起了爭訟執拗,必須要有解決問題的誠意和信心。
畢竟,人生之訟,難以避免。首先,要有解決問題的誠意。
有孚,是最重要的第一步。
卦辭最後兩句,語重心長:
利見大人,不利涉大川。
利的,是有一位恰當的貴人出現,調解雙方矛盾,不是火上加油,不是將形勢推向惡化。
不利的,是涉大川。
這時候,不要再出什麼鬼主意,大計劃。不要再裝神弄鬼,賣弄聰明。有孚,不要再冒險。
林鄭政府誠信完全破產,警隊已變惡棍,黑衣扮臥底,擲磚掟汽油彈,放火,塗污中聯辦、中共國徽,帶頭衝擊,栽贓嫁禍……
面對事實要從根本解決,才能走出困局。
《周易》六十四卦,乾坤兩卦是父母卦,是根本。坤卦《大象傳》這樣說:
地勢坤,君子以厚德載物。
乾卦講天行健,坤卦講地勢坤。
乾卦說的是天理,所以天行,永遠是對的;但坤卦,根據天理形成的現實人間,便要講形勢。
山河大地,有險有阻,沒辦法迴避的,人必須面對人生的種種險阻。
地勢坤,說的是由形組成的勢。有形才有勢。所以,坤卦說的是大地,就出現了勢的概念。
面對由「形」發展出錯綜複雜的「勢」,要怎樣建構平台,伸張我們的抱負理想?
那便是坤卦精神,深植於土,根基厚,處理好人際關係,學會包容。
君子以厚德載物,沒有分別心,心胸寬廣如大地,不理是什麼生物,都可以在大地獲得養份,像慈母一樣包容。
我們要學大地的厚,包容一切。
乾卦的乾道變化,各正性命;到坤卦落實為德,厚德載物,意思是無限的承擔。
自強不息和厚德載物,也就是心物一元。
乾卦說自強不息,但什麼東西可以不息?死後仍存在?
那就是精神不滅,不息,就是心,它不必依靠任何東西的。
坤卦的厚德載物,就是要能夠承擔,藉著承載,才能實現。
這個包容之德,不僅僅是道德勸說,還落實在現實人間,這便是地勢坤的道理。
黑警濫捕,過份武力,年輕人血濺街頭,含冤入獄,但上街的人,愈來愈多,沒有畏懼。
他們用行動訴說《周易》的乾坤兩卦。
2019年8月13日星期二下午5:00
你的收看、訂閱、讚好便是對「易經講堂」的支持,謝謝。
![post-title](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/RdnEwv_lkkQ/hqdefault.jpg)
只有暴政 在 【聲援香港】在民主社會中,沒有暴民,只有暴政 - YouTube 的推薦與評價
![影片讀取中](/images/youtube.png)
【聲援香港】在民主社會中,沒有暴民, 只有暴政. 897 views 3 years ago. 辣台派. 辣台派. 2.66K subscribers. Subscribe. ... <看更多>
只有暴政 在 #沒有暴徒 #只有暴政 | Fight for freedom, Hong kong, Yellow ... 的推薦與評價
Sheng Qi (born 1965 in Anhui Province, China) is a Chinese performance artist and painter. He was one of the original founders of the Chinese performance ... ... <看更多>
只有暴政 在 #沒有暴徒只有暴政 - Explore | Facebook 的推薦與評價
2019年香港政府宣佈修訂《逃犯條例》,允許將犯罪嫌疑人由香港引渡至中國大陸。該法案在香港引發極大爭議,人們擔憂香港的自治將面臨威脅。 ... <看更多>