#波妞聊演員 柯林·佛斯(Colin Firth)
各位粉絲晚安🙆🙆又來到禮拜一啦~~今天要介紹的越老越帥的大叔「Colin Firth」♥上禮拜看完《媽媽咪呀!回來了》,即使戲分沒有很多,但一出現還是成為大家的目光焦點,趕快來看看關於這位集知性、帥氣、沉穩及高貴於一身的演員相關介紹吧!!(不小心透露自己是狂粉)
1960年9月10日出生於英國漢普郡
出生於英國一個小村莊的他,父母都是大學教授,加上父親是奈及利亞的教育部官員的關係,他曾在奈及利亞住過一段時間。十一歲時,他曾經住在美國密蘇里州的聖路易斯,並在當地受過一年的教育,在某次訪問中,提起這段日子,他說:「我在這度過了一段艱難的時光,這裡的確有一兩位優秀的老師,但讀書環境卻不是那麼好,只有2至3位的同學能當作學習目標。」回到英國後,他進入溫切斯特的國王學校就讀,也因為與同儕之間格格不入,遭到霸凌。導致他對課業失去興趣,還學了當地的漢普郡工人階層口音。十四歲時,他做出了一個人生重要決定:「成為一個專業演員」。畢業於中學後,他就搬到倫敦,在皇家國立劇場的戲服部門打工,並進入倫敦戲劇中心就讀。
在戲劇中心的期末公演中扮演《王子復仇記》主角,引起了劇作家朱利安·米切爾的注意,這也讓他獲得1983年舞台劇《Another Country》中的同性戀學生蓋·班內特一角。1984年,該劇改編成電影,這是他第一部電影作品,可是卻飾演了另個角色,而他原來的角色則由魯伯特·埃弗里特演出。隨後,則出演多部電視劇。
1987年,他和蒂姆·羅斯、保羅·麥甘等英國年輕男演員一起被媒體稱作「英國幫」(Brit Pack)。1988年,佛斯主演了電視電影《搖搖欲墜》(Tumbledown),並獲得了英國學術電視獎提名。1989年,他主演了《維爾蒙》,該片改編自法國小說《危險關係》。同年,他在阿根廷政治驚悚片《零號公寓》中出演了一個偏執的且不善社交的角色。
1995年演出了電視版《傲慢與偏見》,演出男主角達西先生,高大英挺的容貌與氣質,使他成了千千萬萬奧斯汀書迷心目中達西先生的最佳人選,也讓他成為英國家喻戶曉的演員。但其實他起初因不了解奧斯汀的文本而拒絕這個角色,最後經勸說才同意出演。其中一個經典片段:「達西在湖中游泳後身著濕襯衫的場景」,被媒體稱為「英國電視史上最令人難忘的時刻之一」。儘管他並不介意自己被看作「性感的大眾情人」,但他希望自己不會一直與《傲慢與偏見》聯繫在一起。因為他怕被定型為這一類演員。
然而,在他接續參演的愛情電影中,有些電影有提到達西先生一角,在這裡最出名的是2001年電影《BJ單身日記》,該片是《傲慢與偏見》故事的現代版本,他接受這個角色是因為他覺得這是個諷刺達西先生一角的好機。這部電影在商業上很成功,也受許多影評人的喜愛,他還甚至出版了自己的一本小說「The Department Of Nothing」。 雖然2004年的續集評價不如預期地好,但依舊取得了票房成功。
除了演活《BJ單身日記》系列中現代版達西先生之外,柯林佛斯一直都勇於嘗試各種不同戲路。2003年他與史嘉蕾喬韓森合作演出《戴珍珠耳環的少女》,演出沉默寡言的荷蘭畫家。之後還在《赤裸真相》有出乎意料的演出,他扮演有藥癮和酒癮的脫口秀藝人,還和電影搭檔凱文貝肯大搞肉慾同志情結,令人印象深刻。2008年他更參與搬上大銀幕的百老匯歌舞愛情喜劇《媽媽咪呀!》,該片是他首次參演音樂劇的電影,他形容該經歷讓他有點頭疼,該片成為當時票房最高的英國電影,在全球進帳六億多美元。
2009年柯林佛斯演出GUCCI前時尚總監湯姆福特首部電影處女作《摯愛無盡》,扮演失去愛人的同性戀教授,片中他哀傷落寞的神情無不令觀眾心碎,動人的演出讓他獲得該年威尼斯影展最佳男主角獎,並首次提名奧斯卡獎。2010年他再接再厲,主演了改編自英國真實歷史的《王者之聲:宣戰時刻》,飾演患有口吃的英國國王喬治六世,該片在多倫多國際電影節上放映後獲得了觀眾的起立鼓掌,而當天恰巧就是他的50歲生日,他開心地說「這是最好的生日禮物。」,憑此片他贏得了奧斯卡獎最佳男主角獎、金球獎最佳戲劇類電影男主角獎,和他的第二座英國電影學院獎最佳男主角獎。
2014年,他和妮可基嫚主演知名驚悚推理小說改編的電影《別相信任何人》,同年上映的《金牌特務》,該片取得了極大的商業成功,也獲得大多好評。2016年,他在真人真事改編的《天才柏金斯》飾演知名作家的幕後推手—編輯柏金斯。同年,與芮妮齊薇格睽違十多年再度聚首於《BJ 有喜》。隔年,再度於《金牌特務:機密對決》回歸,獲得良好的票房。
今年除了年初上映的《獨帆之聲》及上禮拜上映的《媽媽咪呀!回來了》外,年底還有一部作品《愛·滿人間》要上映,這部電影是1964年《歡樂滿人間》的續集,並由迪士尼發行,暫定於12月28日在台上映。
歷年作品有:
1984年《Another Country》
1989年《零號公寓》、《維爾蒙》
1991年《殺機重重》
1995年《他們愛的故事》、《傲慢與偏見》
1996年《英倫情人》
1997年《褪色天堂》、《浪漫足球熱》
1998年《莎翁情史》
2001年《BJ單身日記》
2002年《不可兒戲》
2003年《愛是您·愛是我》、《水瓶座女孩》、《真愛開玩笑》、《戴珍珠耳環的少女》
2004年《BJ單身日記:男人禍水》
2005年《魔法褓姆麥克菲》、《赤裸真相》
2007年《烏龍女校》、《崎路父子情》、《最後兵團》、《再給愛一次機會》
2008年《媽媽咪呀!》、《我的意外老公》、《愛,隨心所欲》、《情留吉諾瓦》
2009年《摯愛無盡》、《烏龍女校2》、《不死魔咒》、《聖誕夜怪譚》
2010年《王者之聲:宣戰時刻》、《榮耀大道》
2011年《諜影行動》》
2012年《亞瑟紐曼》、《冤家偷很大》、《明星短路》
2013年《魔谷奇案》、《心靈勇者》
2014年《魔幻月光》、《別相信任何人》
2015年《金牌特務》
2016年《BJ有喜》、《天才柏金斯》
2017年《金牌特務:機密對決》
2018年《獨帆之聲》、《媽媽咪呀!回來了》、《愛·滿人間》《The Happy Prince 》、《Kursk》
#又帥又有愛心的男人
#致力於保護原始部落居民的人權
#倡導貿易要公平
#替第三世界的人民發聲
同時也有10000部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル,也在其Youtube影片中提到,...
another 2001 評價 在 喬靖夫 Facebook 的最佳解答
【A.I. FOREVER】在Youtube看到的一篇很長的comment,寫得非常詳細,從數據上比較其他偉大球星,檢視Iverson的職業生涯表現,給予他更公正的評價。
(by sportsmed77)
[+Kareem Elwakil Those other posters shouldn't have insulted you to make their points, but I think your arguments are extremely weak. The only thing you bring up is that AI's career FG% was 42% and that he jacked up "30 shots" to get his points. His FG% was technically 42.5% for his career (Tracy McGrady's was 43% and Kobe Bryant's was 45%, which really isn't that much higher relatively speaking by the way) and a lot of AI's missed shots had to do with the team he was playing on and how their offense was structured, his role on the team as the only scorer, etc. but I won't get into that. AI averaged about 21 shots per game for his career, by the way. Hardly the 30 shots per game you tried to give him credit for. AI led the NBA in scoring 4 times, and out of those for times, only twice did he also lead the league in field goal attempts (and not by much - plus he averaged more free throws than everyone else) so the argument that "if anyone shot as much as AI did, they would score as much too" clearly is not the case. In his prime, Tracy McGrady averaged about 23 shots per game, Kobe Bryant also about 23 shots per game, and AI also about 23 shots per game. AI, Kobe, and Jordan all had a season where they shot the ball 27 times per game. Per 36 minutes, AI only averaged 19 shots per game for his career (keep in mind, AI played more minutes than anyone else each game during his era). Michael Jordan averaged 23 shots per game for his entire career. For his career, Jerry West averaged 20 shots per game and in his prime, it was about 22 shots per game. Before Lebron James got there, Dwayne Wade was averaging between 20 and 22 shots per game for a few seasons because he was the go-to option. You know what all of these players have in common with AI? They were all SHOOTING GUARDS and the go-to option! They were supposed to shoot! Some SGs are volume shooters who slash and get to the free throw line. Some of them have lower FG% but still are productive for their teams. Other SGs have a higher efficiency, but a player's FG% really depends on a number of factors you haven't even taken into consideration.
To reiterate this point, for most of AI's career, he was a SHOOTING GUARD. I hate when people compare him to point guards and then act like he was worse than them because he didn't play like a PG. It is ridiculous because it is like comparing apples with oranges. By the way, you brought up Jason Kidd and how he was so much "better" than AI. Did you know Jason Kidd's career FG% is 40%? He had 10 seasons where he shot below 40% for the season. AI only shot below 40% for 1.5 seasons and his career FG% is higher than J-Kidd's. J-Kidd averaged 12 PPG for his career and only 2.8 free throw attempts. AI averages about 27 PPG for his career. So just as you can say J-Kidd was a way better passer than AI, I can say AI was a way better scorer than J-Kidd. They had different roles and they excelled in their roles. Jason's job was to pass, and AI's job was to create shots.
It is a myth that AI was not a good passer. AI averaged 6.2 assists per game for his career. That is good for a SG - more than Kobe, more than MJ, more than Vince Carter, more than Tracy McGrady, more than Wade, etc. AI had about 5 or 6 seasons where he averaged between 7 and 8 assists per game while still scoring 26+ points. It is impressive. He had an entire season where he averaged 33 PPG and 7.4 APG with 2 steals on 45% shooting and a TS% of over 54%, and people like you try to say he was just "okay at best"? AI had a unique style, especially for his size and was probably one of the top 5 most exciting players to watch. To say he was not "that good" shows that you likely saw very few AI games. I would say AI is a top 20-30 player all-time. Anyone who actually saw, for example, his 2001 play-offs and regular season run, would know that he was amazing and did so much for that team and if someone looks at the stat box, they will not get the actual story. You had to have seen the games with your own eyes. With AI, stats have always been misleading. I also want to point out that AI's True Shooting % (TS%) is slightly higher than Isiah "Zeke" Thomas and is pretty decent (at about 52%). He had a couple of seasons in Denver where his TS% was almost 57%. TS% is a much more accurate depiction of someone's accuracy when shooting. You know why? Because it takes into account free throws among other factors. AI is one of the greatest players of all-time at getting to the free throw line, and unlike Lebron James and many others, he didn't flop to do it. He was legitimately fouled, hurt, and referees even admitted to conspiring against him and purposely not calling fouls on players who fouled him when they should have. Yet AI is still 10th all-time in free throws made. He was a slashing, fearless guard with incredible talent and an ability to create shots for himself that very few other players have been able to do. His style of play is more comparable to Kobe Bryant or Tracy McGrady (Kobe had a better career, but in AI's prime there were seasons where they were almost equally good). Yet he is 160 lbs. soaking wet so he is an anomoly because small players aren't supposed to be able to do what he does. The two years AI's shooting percentage was the lowest in Philly, he had just come off of a serious elbow surgery (2001-2002) and had played with a broken hand another season. You put so much emphasis on his accuracy those seasons, but what about his heart? How many players would play with the injuries he had? I guarantee you not many. Even while in Denver, Carmelo said AI was playing with a broken finger the entire season. In the 2001 play-offs by the end of the 2nd round, AI had 7 injuries (serious elbow bursitis, knee bursitis, dislocated shoulder, sprained thumb, hip pointer, bruised tailbown, and twisted ankle). Yet he played, and he played his heart out contributing to his team in other ways even when he couldn't find his shooting rhythm due to the pain he was in. I watched every game he played in back then (even taped them so I could immitate some of his moves since I played ball). I would know.
I am definitely convinced that anyone who claims Iverson was an "extremely poor shooter" either did not watch him play or knows a lot less about basketball than they think they know. AI was not a poor shooter. He took incredibly difficult shots - often times while double and triple teamed, and given that he was smaller than everyone else, it is incredible that he still made some of them. He was a shot creator. He was immensely creative. Larry Brown even used to sit on the sidelines and call out to AI to shoot the ball more and create shots. Even George Karl in Denver once told AI to shoot the ball more, stop being so UNSELFISH, and take over games the way he used to in Philly. Unfortunately the media doesn't like to talk about that. Not one of AI's teammates thought he was selfish. I have seen very few players who are as loved and respected by his former teammates and former peers as AI. The amount of love he gets from everyone from Dr. J, Maurice Cheeks, Moses Malone, Kobe Bryant, Lebron James, Dwayne Wade, Carmelo Anthony, Aaron McKie, Eric Snow, Theo Ratliff, Dikembe Mutombo, Chris Webber, Kyle Korver, Chris Paul, James Harden, Larry Brown, Paul Pierce, John Thompson, Andre Iguodala, Larry Hughes, Bill Walton, Rip Hamilton, Rasheed Wallace, Shawn Marion, Steve Nash, Dirk Nowitzki, Shaquille O'Neal, etc. etc. etc. I can go on and on. Many of these very players have called AI "pound for pound the greatest." I have seen very few players get so much love and adoration by their peers. I was at AI's jersey retirement and heard what so many players around the league past and present had to say about him and it was just insane. I also have never heard one of AI's former teammates call him a bad teammate. They loved him and loved playing with him. It is the media that tries to paint that picture, but his peers and former teammates paint a completely different picture.
What the media says is a myth. AI's former coaches and teammates and peers adore him. In 2001, AI had the most first place MVP votes in history (tied with Shaq) and became the smallest player to ever win the MVP award. You think he is overrated? I guarantee you the people who vote on MVP, the players, the coaching staff, etc. know far more about AI's contributions to the sport, how good he was, etc. than you do. He deserves what he got. Every accomplishment he achieved, he did it despite immense adversity. He is 7th All-Time in PPG, 4th All-Time in Minutes Played, 7th All-time in Steals, won 1st Team All-NBA multiple times... this man played with so much heart and believed in himself so much that you had to believe in him. This man is up there with MJ, Kobe, Wilt, and players of that caliber for most 40 and 50 point games in his career. I hate when people try to take away from his accomplishments rather than appreciating him for what he accomplished at his size and what he brought to the game. He is the reason I played basketball at all. He gave little people hope. He is a cultural icon. I really wish people would stop with the "AI is overrated" nonsense. If your peers think that highly of you to call you "pound for pound the greatest," then obviously you did something right. ]
#alleniverson #theanswer #ai3 #onlythestrongsurvive #sixers #76ers #bubbachuck #basketballneverstops