關於 better off without you 中文 ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

今日教大家
📌 豉油雞
📌白灼牛肩胛
📌 砵仔糕

🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏
蘋果膠中文購買連結 送冰皮月餅粉
海外觀眾優惠完結，只限香港粉絲
https://www.jlc-health.com/tc-maria-mooncake-special

✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨

和牛凍肉資料👉https://bit.ly/3adssZ3
💥💥💥肥媽粉絲優惠💥💥💥💥
優惠價+套餐折扣+禮物1＋禮物2+免費送貨
$1000送開合式矽膠隔熱墊
$2000再送可調適量匙

✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨
豉油雞
材料: 光雞一隻，薑.蔥.乾蔥頭.老抽二湯匙，片糖半塊，半碗紹興酒或一至二湯匙玫瑰露，細半碗生抽
香料:桂皮.香葉.一粒八角。
做法:
1 洗淨雞放滾水中淥一淥後即放冷水中過冷河(雞身較爽)
2索乾雞身內外水份用2大湯匙老抽內外塗勻雞身，將二片薑及蔥放雞肚內
3薑.乾蔥頭.桂皮.香葉八角放鑊中爆香加半碗紹興酒及細半碗生抽加半塊片糖煮溶
4將汁料倒入電飯煲雞胸向下放煲中，
每10分鐘轉雞身一次，共30分鐘
English Version
Soya Sauce Chicken in a Rice Cooker
(YouTube video starts at 4:30 )
Ingredients:
Whole chicken - 1
Shallots
Ginger slices
Cinnamon stick
Bay leaf
Star anise - 1
Garlic, optional
Green onion - 2 bunches (1 bunch for the cavity of chicken. 1 bunch to put in the rice cooker inner pot.)
Seasonings:
Dark soya sauce - 2 tbsp
Shaoxing wine - ½ a bowl (or you can use Chinese rose wine but only use 1 – 2 tbsp due to the strong taste)
Light soya sauce - ½ a bowl
Chinese brown sugar - ½ a slab (or you can use Chinese rock sugar but less richer in flavour)
Methods:
1. In a pot of boiling water, grab the whole chicken by the neck and dip it into the boiling water a couple of times and lastly submerge the chicken head into the boiling water. With a pair of chopsticks, secure the chicken neck and transfer to pot of ice-cold water or flush cold water in the sink to stop the cooking process.
This step will result in firm skin texture, to prevent the chicken skin from breaking, and to better absorb the color from the dark soya sauce.
2. Gently pat dry the whole interior and exterior of the chicken with paper towel.
3. Chop both chicken feet to prevent them from sticking out from the rice cooker. Set aside.
4. In a bowl, add in the whole chicken and coat the exterior and interior of the chicken with dark soya sauce. Stuff a bunch of green onion and two big slices of ginger into the cavity of the chicken. Set aside.
5. In a heated wok, add in less than a tbsp of oil, shallots, ginger slices, cinnamon stick, bay leaf, and fry until fragrant and slightly charred then transfer to the rice cooker inner pot.
6. Add the chicken feet and the whole dark soya sauce coated chicken into the rice cooker inner pot with the chicken breast facing down. Add in Shaoxing wine, light soya sauce, 1 bunch of green onion, and Chinese brown sugar. This step is done or you can take an extra step to heat up the sauce in a pan. Pour all the sauce out from the rice cooker inner pot into a pan and bring to boil then return the sauce to the rice cooker inner pot.
7. Put it in the rice cooker and cook for 10 minutes, after 10 minutes flip the whole chicken over on its side and cook for further 5 minutes for each side for a total of 10 minutes. After 10 minutes, TURN OFF the heat and let the chicken sit in the rice cooker for further 10 minutes. Total cooking time 30 minutes.
8. Let the chicken cool for 20 to 30 minutes before cutting into pieces. Pour the liquid from the rice cooker to a cooking pot and bring to a boil and let it reduce to a thick sauce. Drizzle sauce over chicken. Serve.
✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨
📌白灼牛肩胛
材料
📌 牛肩胛一碟（按照自己份量需要）
📌 薑一至兩片
📌 葱兩至三棵
📌 辣椒適量
📌 鼓油半碗
📌 麻油一茶匙
📌 生粉少許
📌 酒一湯匙
📌 清水
做法
1. 薑片切條再切粒。
2. 開火煲滾熱水，把薑粒和酒放入煲內，煮滾。
3. 牛肩胛一片片分開，加入生粉撈均。
4. 葱切絲用水稍浸，之後瀝乾。辣椒切片或粒，之後和葱撈均。
5. 用碗把鼓油，麻油和少許步驟4的葱和辣椒，撈均。
6. 準備一隻碟，放入步驟4剩餘大半的葱和辣椒鋪底，備用。
7. 牛肩胛一片片放入煲中，灼大約10-15秒。
8. 把牛肩胛放在已鋪底的碟上，之後再次鋪上步驟4餘下的葱和辣椒在面。
9. 最後倒入已調味的鼓油（步驟5），即成。
English Version
Poached Beef Chuck Slices
(YouTube video starts at 30:15)
Ingredients:
Beef chunk slices
Ginger - diced
Shaoxing wine - 1 tbsp
Cornstarch
Spring onion - wash, soak in water and rinse well
Fresh red chilli
Dipping sauce ingredients:
Light soya sauce
Fresh red chilli
Sesame oil
Green onion
Methods:
1. On a plate, separate the beef chuck slices and mix thoroughly with corn starch. This is to make the meat more tender.
2. In a dipping bow, add in light soya sauce, sesame oil, fresh red chilli, green onion, and mix well. Set aside.
3. In a cooking pot, add in water, diced ginger, Shaoxing wine, and bring to a boil. Add in the beef chuck slices and poach them briefly and transfer them to a serving plate covered with green onion and red chilli pieces. Garnish with more green onion and serve with dipping sauce or drizzle dipping over the plate. Serve.
✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨
📌砵仔糕
材料：
70 g 粘米粉
一湯匙粟粉
85 ml水
椰糖一塊
片糖1/4塊
150ml 水
紅豆(早一晚浸過夜，然後用水浸過紅豆煲滾至熟,不要開蓋，焗一個鐘, 盛起紅豆備用)
做法：
1) 先把小碗輕輕掃油，蒸熱
2) 粘米粉，粟粉放在碗來,先放入1/3的85ml水入碗內，用手把水搓入粉內，再加入1/3的水、將水搓入粉內至成團，再加入餘下的水，搓均，放一旁備用
3) 切碎棷糖及片糖，放入煲內，加入150ml 水，煲至糖完全溶解
4) 糖水大滾後，先再拌勻粉漿，然後分三次把已煑滾糖水撞入粉漿，邊撞，邊攪拌至糖水完全加入
4) 把紅豆分入已蒸熱的小碗內，然後倒入粉漿
5) 用保鮮紙包蓋著小碗
6)大火蒸15至20分鐘至熟
Red Bean Pudding (“Put Chai Ko”)
(YouTube video starts at 14:08)
Ingredients:
Rice flour - 70g
Corn starch/flour - 1 tbsp
Water - 85ml
Red bean - 50g – 60g (soak overnight, cook till tender and leave the lid on to cook further without the heat. This will preserve their shapes and still tender inside.)
Sugar mixture ingredients:
Palm sugar &/or Chinese brown sugar - 60g a small piece (crush into tiny pieces)
Water - 150ml
Water - 1 tsp, optional (larger pieces of sugar will take longer to melt so add an additional 1 tsp of water to the melted mixture to make up for the evaporated water.)
Methods:
1. In a heat-proof mixing bowl, add in rice flour, and corn starch. Slowly add in a bit of water and knead well to let the rice flour absorb the water and MUST form a dough like texture then add a bit more water and continue to knead until the rice flour has absorbed the water and becomes dough like texture again. Continue with this process until the water is finished. Set aside.
This kneading process will give a firm, bouncy texture to the pudding whereas simple mixing all the ingredients together without this kneading process will be soft and sticky.
2. Prepare 6 small bowls. Brush each with a bit of oil and steam them. Steamed bowls will cook batter evenly.
3. In a cooking pot, add in palm sugar, Chinese brown sugar, water, and cook until sugar has melted. Optional to add 1 tsp of water if sugar takes longer to melt and more water has evaporated. Bring to a boil.
4. Add boiling melted sugar mixture into Step 1 rice flour mixture and mix well. Set aside.
5. To assemble, add the red bean first to the 6 small steamed bowls. With a ladle, add and divide mixture from Step 4 evenly among the 6 small bowls. Make sure to keep stirring the mixture each time you add to the small bowl to avoid the sugar and rice flour mixture from separating.
6. Cover the bowls with plastic wrap and steam 20 minutes.
7. Let puddings cool before removing the bowls. Insert skewers into the sides of the puddings. Serve.

一封給國家地理頻道「Dog: Impossible」節目負責人的公開信:

An open letter to the leadership team of Nat Geo Wild Dog Impossible:

Translate: Yu-Hwa Su 翻譯: 蘇昱華
Proof: Yen Ke 校對: 葛雁

The International Association of Animal Behavior Consultants (IAABC) applauds National Geographic’s mission to offer intelligent, relevant and captivating non-fiction entertainment. This is a crucial objective, especially as an introduction to children and viewers largely relying on television for their scientific information.
國際動物行為諮詢師協會（IAABC）對於國家地理頻道致力於提供電視觀眾正確知識與科學內容表示讚賞。這是一個非常重要的目標，特別是對依賴電視得到這些知識的兒童與其他觀眾們來說。

However, your stated mission is in direct conflict with your show Dog: Impossible. In fact, the irresponsible treatment of the dogs and people on this show flies in the face of all best practices in animal training and behavior. Rather than promoting science and scientifically-proven methodology, Dog: Impossible sacrifices learning science for more dramatic television.
然而，貴頻道所提供的節目「Dog: Impossible」卻與貴頻道「提供正確的科學知識」的一貫立場衝突。節目中對犬隻以及飼主的不負責處理方式與應有的動物訓練及行為操作的準則相違背。「Dog: Impossible」並沒有提倡科學以及經科學驗證的方法，這節目犧牲了對科學的學習，轉而追求吸睛的電視節目效果。

Matt Beisner appears to have no credentials or education in training and behavior, yet he refers to himself as a behaviorist. His claim that “energy is the one language that every animal on the planet speaks” makes clear he is not one.
Matt Beisner並沒有動物訓練或行為學的相關學習經歷與證照，卻宣稱自己是一位行為學家。從他的主張：「能量是地球上所有動物都會使用的共通語言」，便能明白他並不是行為學家。

His statement, “You don’t need tricks, you don’t need treats, you don’t need force,” shows just how unaware of his own actions he is. His misuse of scientific terminology leads viewers to believe they are learning demonstrated, safe and accepted strategies in helping their dogs. In fact, Mr. Beisner is forcing these dogs from start to finish of each episode. His own “tricks” are that of over-stressing dogs until they’re in a state referred to in psychology and science as “learned helplessness.”
他主張「你不需要技巧、零食、或蠻力 (去訓練狗)」，這顯示出他對於自己的所做所為一無所知。他對科學術語的濫用也會誤導觀眾，讓觀眾以為他們正在學習經證實有效而且安全可接受的方法來幫助狗狗。但這位訓練師在每一集節目上從頭到尾都是在逼迫這些狗，而他所擁有的「技巧」，就是讓狗進入過度緊迫的狀態，直到牠們進入心理學和科學上所指的「習得無助」（learned helplessness）狀態。

Learned helplessness occurs when a subject endures repeated aversive stimuli beyond their control. Originally thought to show a subject's acceptance of their powerlessness, for more than half a century it’s been known instead to be the emotional “shutting down” of the subject. Anxiety, clinical depression, and related mental illnesses are common consequences of this technique in humans.
「習得無助」發生在動物沒有任何控制權，且重複地被施加嫌惡刺激的時候。最初，人們認為習得無助狀態意味著動物「接受」了自身無法改變、無能為力的情形，超過半個世紀以來，人們認為這是動物情緒「關機（shutting down）」的表現。在人類身上，習得無助的常見結果包含焦慮、憂鬱症、以及相關的心理疾病。

Allow us to note some aspects of the trailer and his shows, but first, to point out a few well-documented and commonly understood aspects of dog behavior so that we may better make our points understood.
在我們解釋為何我們認為此節目的預告片與內容不適當之前，我們希望先闡述一些正確的犬隻行為常識，以便您能更理解我們的觀點。

Canine body language indicating stress and severe stress:
顯示出壓力以及嚴重緊迫的犬隻肢體語言：

Compressed bodies
Dry, raspy panting
Wide, open eyes with dilated pupils
Heavy drooling
“Whipping” head and body back, pushing off a handler in order to get away
Growling
Fighting
Biting
縮緊身體
急促的喘氣
睜大雙眼、散瞳
大量流口水
甩頭、用前爪推抱著狗的人以退後、試圖掙脫
低吼
打架
開咬

Eleven seconds into the trailer, Mr. Beisner rubs his hands together, smiling, and says, “This is going to be gnarly.” All professionals know from that statement what the series will spotlight: A poorly (if at all) educated non-professional pushing dogs way beyond therapeutic limits, in the name of “results.”
在預告片11秒的地方，Beisner先生搓手並笑著說「等一下會很精采喔」。所有專業人士都知道這句話代表這個節目的亮點將會是：一名缺乏適當教育的訓練師，逼迫狗到超過其能承受的極限，並把這樣的結果稱為是良好的改善。

Flooding, the term for inundating a subject with their fears, phobias and triggers, is ethically questionable at best, cruel and unnecessary, always. There's also a common danger of spontaneous recovery of the phobia. This is because flooding doesn't replace the fear-response with a different response, it just replaces it with no response. “No response” is simply suppression, not cure.
「洪水法」，指的是故意將動物置於恐慌或恐懼的觸發刺激情境，這樣的方法不道德、殘忍、而且沒必要。另外，恐懼的自發性回復（spontaneous recovery）也是洪水法常見的風險，這是因為洪水法並沒有將害怕的反應重新制約成其他不同的情緒行為，它只是讓動物沒有反應。「沒有反應」只是壓抑，動物並沒有因此感到不害怕或恐慌。

Throughout the trailer dogs are flooded with aversive stimuli such as other dogs, people and equipment, something an ethical professional would not, and could not do per any answerable guidelines of animal training and behavior care.
在整個預告片中，狗狗被迫接受各種嫌惡刺激的洪水法訓練，例如其他狗、其他人類和物品，這是具有道德的專業訓練人員不會做的，任何負責任的動物訓練及行為照護準則也不會如此建議。

Systematic desensitization and counterconditioning, gradual exposure to the feared object, and replacement of a negative emotional association with a more pleasant one, are the recommended techniques used to treat such fear and aggression cases, per all legitimate veterinary, training and behavior organizations.
系統性減敏與反制約，也就是逐步與少量的讓狗接觸其本來會害怕的事物，並且將引發的少量負面情緒與其非常喜愛的事物配對給予，是用來處理恐懼及攻擊案例的建議方法，也是每個好的獸醫師、訓練及行為機構會推薦的方法。

Beisner’s statement that “We know at the Zen Yard that dogs help other dogs come out of their shell and face their fear and get past their aggression” isn’t just scientifically unsupportable, his words ring hollow during the very scene playing while he says those words: Beisner restraining one dog, while his co-host pulls a leashed dog to the first in a completely unnatural gesture perhaps intended to either mimic natural dog greeting (it doesn’t) or to flood the heavily drooling dog who is unable to move or get away. The dogs end up in a fight. They have been set up to fail, and the outcome is inevitable.
Beisner宣稱「我們在Zen Yard（他的訓練中心）知道狗會去幫助其他狗融入外界、面對牠們的恐懼並且克服攻擊行為」，這句話不只是缺乏科學支持，在影片中他講出這句話時搭配的畫面，亦表現出他的說詞缺乏支持：Beisner限制了第一隻狗的行動，由節目的共同主持人以牽繩將另一隻狗以一個完全不自然的姿勢拉到第一隻狗身邊，他們可能是在試著模仿狗狗自然的社交打招呼行為（但並不是），或使用洪水法訓練那隻狂流口水（顯示牠很緊張）並且無法逃脫的狗。最終兩隻狗打起來，訓練師製造的這個情境，讓失敗的結果無可避免。

In the trailer, the assistant host, Stefanie DiOrio, states, “Nervousness can easily turn to fear which can lead to aggression.” This is an accurate statement, which is why it’s so confusing that the entire show would be predicated on pushing dogs to the very edge of survivable stress and into predictable aggression, doubling down on the issues that their owners are struggling with.
在預告片中，節目的共同主持人Stefanie DiOrio說「緊張不安很容易變成真正的恐懼，並且導致攻擊行為」，這句話是正確的，但也讓人更加困惑為何整個節目的走向都在將狗推向牠們所能承受壓力的極限、觸發根本可預測的攻擊行為、並使飼主所面對的問題加倍惡化。

We know that the dramatic changes in behavior, from stressed and wildly aggressive to “calm” dogs, make for compelling TV. To an average pet owner it looks like these dogs are making huge improvements. All clients just want their dog to “Stop being aggressive.” However, we also know that behavior suppression is not the same as behavior modification, that a stressed and shut-down dog is a more dangerous animal than one who is actively showing aggression, and that the long-term prognosis of this kind of intervention is poor for both the client and their dog.
我們知道行為上戲劇性的變化，從一隻緊迫且兇猛攻擊的狗轉變成“冷靜”的狗，這個過程代表了高收視率，在不十分了解行為學的飼主眼中看來，這些狗狗似乎有巨大的進步。飼主都只是希望他們的狗「不要再有攻擊性」，然而我們也知道單純抑制攻擊行為的出現，並不是真正的行為改善技術。舉例來說一隻高壓力但看似沒有反應的狗，遠比一隻會表現出攻擊性的狗要危險許多 (譯註: 因為這樣的狗可能會沒有徵兆地開咬)，因此這種抑制攻擊行為的訓練法，以長遠來看對飼主以及狗狗都是有害的。

It is also worth pointing out that, like his predecessor, Mr Beisner’s assessment of cause for much of the issues he’s asked to address is simple, made especially clear in episode 4 where he not only saves a dog, he “saves a marriage:” Women are unable to effectively lead, must be stronger, must change their ways.
另一個值得注意的事是Beisner先生，如同他在同一個頻道的前輩，西薩，對導致問題的原因評估也過於簡化，例如第四集中他聲稱他不只拯救了狗狗，他還「拯救了這段婚姻」，因為女主人無法有效的領導狗狗，因此她必須更堅強，必須改變他們之間的相處模式。

Misogyny, it seems, cures dog behavior problems. Real exploration and explanation regarding the antecedents and consequences around behaviors are ignored in favor of client blaming.
這段貶抑女性的解釋，看起來似乎能改善犬隻的行為問題，然而關於行為問題真正的前因後果卻被指責客戶所取代，並沒有真正的被探討與解釋。

The clients on the show represent thousands of clients throughout the US and beyond with whom we work every day, helping them to help their dogs. Far from being dogs “other people won’t work with,” the dogs on your show are exactly the clients and dogs that IAABC Certified Dog Behavior Consultants, as well as all members of the American College of Veterinary Behaviorists, Certified Applied Animal Behaviorists, and other certified behavior specialists see and successfully work with every day.
節目中所出現的客戶正代表了我們日常工作中所會幫助的人們與他們的狗，呈現的就是我們在美國跟其他國家的上千位客戶。節目中所出現的這些有著行為問題的狗絕對不是「其他訓練師都不想要處理的狗狗」，事實上這些客戶與狗正是IAABC認證的狗行為諮詢師、美國獸醫行為學家、認證的應用動物行為學家或是其他受認證的行為學專家，每天工作的日常。

We do so using the best practices of our field (see https://m.iaabc.org/about/ethics/), adopted by the leading behavior and training organizations, without psychologically or physically harming the animals we work with.
我們在這個領域也使用最嚴謹的訓練師專業道德守則（英文版參見https://m.iaabc.org/about/ethics/，中文版參見https://reurl.cc/72eVkl），這個守則受領先的行為及訓練機構所採用，使訓練師與行為諮詢師在工作時，不對我們經手的動物造成生理或心理上的傷害。

The IAABC urges Nat Geo WILD to stop promoting this public miseducation. The tactics employed in the name of entertainment are unnecessarily harsh and potentially dangerous to the public, and they teach yet another generation of Nat Geo watchers absolutely incorrect and harmful practices.
IAABC呼籲國家地理頻道（Nat Geo WILD）停止傳播此系列誤導公眾的資訊。以娛樂包裝節目的策略對於觀眾是不必要的粗糙而且有潛在風險的，甚至是向頻道的年輕一代觀眾灌輸完全不正確且有害的做法。

It remains a mystery why your network is so intent on harming dogs. After years of Cesar Milan, to now bring in a man equally unskilled, who equates terrified, angry or entrapped dogs to his own addiction history is remarkable. Are we really satisfied conflating ego with compassion, self-focus with an understanding of animal behavior? Is this the “science” your mission stands for?
我們仍然不知為何貴頻道這麼多年來如此堅持持續傷害狗的這些作為。在西薩 (Cesar Milan) 的節目播映多年之後，現在又引進一個同樣缺乏正確訓練技巧，以自身藥物成癮困擾歷史去錯誤的同理恐懼或憤怒的狗的人。我們能接受一個膨脹自我，而非真正擁有同情心、適當自我聚焦、了解動物行為的「專業人士」嗎？這就是貴節目所宣稱的「科學」立場嗎？

The damage Nat Geo is doing to dogs by choosing this type of programming is astounding. We can only assume that the producers are unaware of this, as it’s hard to imagine such harm and cruelty would be deliberate.
國家地理頻道選擇製作這類節目對於狗狗的傷害甚鉅，我們只能假定節目製作人並沒有意識到這點，因為我們難以想像會有人故意去做這樣有害且殘忍的事情。

Would you show a reality program on heart surgery with a photogenic “self-taught” practitioner, simply stating the star was not a doctor before showing him mutilating a real patient?
想問貴節目是否會採用一個上鏡的“自學”外科醫生錄製心臟手術的實境節目，告知觀眾他並非真正的醫生，然後播放他對病患動刀的畫面？

I leave you with the clearest image of suffering and abuse from your trailer: the Aussie, stressed to the breaking point, thick ropes of drool streaming from its mouth, being choked by a slip lead to compensate for the host’s inability to even effectively muzzle a dog. This dog is at the point of collapse. This dog is being tortured, and that is not hysteria. That is an assessment by any educated measure.
作為結尾，我希望指出貴節目預告片中明確顯示出狗狗受苦或受虐的畫面：那隻澳洲牧羊犬已經瀕臨壓力的極限，您可以看到口水掛在其嘴邊 (大量口水為壓力徵兆)，口罩因為沒有確實的配戴而滑脫，導致牠被勒到快要窒息，已在崩潰邊緣。具備專業與適當教育的人員指出，這隻狗因在節目上被虐待而情緒崩潰，並非其本身歇斯底里。

Please stop this cruel and dangerous programming. To do otherwise is to support that self-taught heart surgery and all the consequences it would bring; that this show is currently bringing to families struggling with their dogs.
Professionals refer to Cesar Milan’s influence on dog training as “job security” because so many dogs ruined or made far worse by his teachings are brought to us by well-intentioned, often weeping owners desperate for real help. Often it is too late.
請停止這系列殘酷且危險的節目。否則貴節目就等同於支持前面舉例的自學的心臟外科「醫師」進行手術一樣，這些危險的後果正由觀眾與他們的狗承擔。專業訓犬人士將西薩米蘭對訓犬的影響戲稱為「工作保障」，因為太多飼主使用了他教授的技巧後，狗狗的狀況變得更糟，而哭著迫切尋找真正的協助，此時通常都為時已晚。

We do not want more work due to this same phenomenon.
我們不想要因為這個節目帶來類似影響而接到更多工作。

We’d be happy to provide you with any education and resources you need to inform your producers about what would qualify as responsible, effective, safe and thoughtful work with the same “red zone” dogs you sell so well.
但我們很樂意提供貴頻道任何需要的教育與資源，讓您們的節目製作人對訓犬工作應有的品質有所理解，例如負責、有效、安全，並且理解到對於在節目中出現的這些「危險」犬隻，事實上有更合理的訓練方法。

Thank you for your consideration.
謝謝您的閱讀與理解。

Marjie Alonso
Executive Director, IAABC
For the Board of Directors

Marjie Alonso
IAABC執行長
代表董事會發言

【前港督彭定康錄影發言　促香港政府撤回修訂逃犯條例】

「我希望即使在這個最後階段，政府仍然可以退讓，撤回方案，不要再添亂。這修例不需要通過，亦不應該通過，香港應該繼續是一個有法治、有自由的社會，而不應該面對這些令人憂心的引渡修例。」

發言英文紀錄及中文翻譯：

Former Hong Kong Governor Lord Chris Patten video message Transcript

I know that this week in Hong Kong, thousands of people will be making their views clear, demonstrating against the proposals on extradition, which the government has put forward, extradition to China. It’s a proposal, or a set of proposals, which strike a terrible blow - I think - and so, I think to most people in Hong Kong and so does the international community, against the rule of law, against Hong Kong’s stability and security, against Hong Kong’s position as a great international trading hub. And the surprise is that the government in Hong Kong doesn’t seem to understand that. It does make you wonder sometimes who actually runs Hong Kong these days: is it the Hong Kong government or is it the joint liaison office acting on behalf of the communist regime in Beijing?

Why is this important? Well it’s the latest in a number of things that have happened in recent years which have tightened Beijing’s grip on Hong Kong, and which have profoundly worried people. I think for ten or a dozen years after 1997, things in Hong Kong went pretty well. Of course they could have gone better, I’m sorry that Beijing throttled the development of democracy, much against the promises that have been made earlier. But by and large, I think, Hong Kong remained a very free and successful society.

But ever since the regime in Beijing started to roll back Deng Xiaoping’s reforms and the developments that have taken place under Jiang Zemin and Zhu Rongji and Hu Jintao, and Wen Jiabao; ever since then, with the Party taking control over everything, cracking down on dissidents, cracking down on human rights, locking people up, incarcerating them in Xinjiang and so on. Ever since then, we know that Beijing has also been tightening its grip, or trying to, in Hong Kong. And I think that the latest proposals on extradition are an example of that.

Now a lot of very spurious arguments are put forward, it said that the present situation is a “loophole” which needs to be filled up - that’s absolute nonsense. People have known exactly why there shouldn’t be an extradition agreement with China for years, and many of the arguments put for the government’s proposals don’t actually pass the laugh-off-your-seat test. The argument that, well, it’s better to have an extradition treaty than to abduct people illegally from Hong Kong - are people really supposed to believe that?

Except for, but of course, Western democracies in Europe have extradition agreements with China, but they’re in a very different position to the position that Hong Kong is in. The reason why international chambers of commerce, why lawyers, why business around the world, why governments have raised their objections is very simple: because what these proposals do is to remove the firewall between Hong Kong’s rule of law and the idea of law - which prevails in Communist China - an idea of law where there aren’t any independent courts, where the courts and the security services and the party’s rules - which are, sometimes, pretty obscure - are rolled altogether. That’s why we’ve seen recently Canadian citizens that are locked up are taken as if it were hostage against things happening in Canada itself under the rule of law there. So it’s not surprising that people are so worried about what is happening.

I know that when people talk about the particular problem in relation to Taiwan, the leaders of the Hong Kong Bar Association over the last few years, I think a dozen of them, have put forward proposals which show how you could deal with that issue building on the existing common law.

So these proposals are bad for Hong Kong, they - I think - raise all sorts of questions which the government hasn’t even thought through, not least about Hong Kong’s economic importance and economic stability. We know very well that Hong Kong needs to be treated separately in economic and commercial matters from the rest of China. When I was governor a long time ago, I used to travel to Washington fairly regularly to argue the case for treating Hong Kong differently from, say, Shenzhen and Shanghai. But if you appear to be regarding Hong Kong from Beijing as though it was just another China city, then sooner or later, economic governments around the world, businesses around the world, when they’re looking even at things like the Belt and Road Initiative, they’re going to regard Hong Kong as just another part of China, and that would be really bad for the standard of living, for the quality of life in Hong Kong!

Above all, of course, if we go ahead, if the government goes ahead with this extradition agreement, it will cause unnecessary worries and anxieties in Hong Kong. That’s a really bad thing. I hope that even at this late stage, the government will back off and leave well alone. It doesn’t have to happen, it shouldn’t happen, and Hong Kong should carry on as a free society, under the rule of law, without having to worry about this extradition.

前港督彭定康錄影講話翻譯

我知道這星期在香港，成千上萬的人將會到街上遊行表達自己的意見，反對政府所提出將會容許引渡到中國的引渡修例建議。這是一項，或者應該說是一系列我及國際社會認為將會對香港的法治、香港的穩定和社會安全造成很大打擊的建議，它將會嚴重傷害香港作為一個國際貿易中心的地位。令人驚訝的是，香港政府似乎並不理解這一點。這確實令人懷疑這些日子究竟是誰在管治香港：是香港政府還是代表北京共產黨政權的中聯辦？

為甚麼這修例是這麼重要？這是近年來發生的一系列容許北京強行控制香港的事件之一，而這一直以來都讓人深感憂慮。我覺得在1997年之後的十年至十幾年，香港的情況進展尚算順利。當然，是本來可以更好，我很遺憾北京扼殺了香港民主的發展，違背了之前所作出的承諾。但總的來說，香港在那個時候仍然是一個非常自由和成功的社會。

但是，自北京政權開始推翻鄧小平的改革以及在江澤民、朱熔基、胡錦濤和溫家寶時期所推行的發展以後，共產黨控制着一切，打擊持不同政見的人，打擊人權，在新疆把人民關押等等。從那時起，我們就知道北京一直在試圖加緊控制香港。我認為最新的引渡建議就是一個例子。

現在香港政府提出了許多非常虛假的論點，它說目前的情況是展現了一個需要填補的「洞」，這絕對是胡說八道。大家多年來都確切地清楚知道不應該與中國達成引渡協議的原因。而政府提出的許多論點實際上也沒有一個不令你拍案大笑。政府認為制定引渡條約比從香港非法綁架人民更好，你認真覺得人們應該相信這個說法嗎？

當然他們又會說歐洲的西方民主國家與中國已經簽訂了引渡協議，但它們與香港根本處於完全不同的地位。國際商會、律師、商人及各國政府之所以提出反對意見的原因非常簡單：因為這些修例將會摧毀香港法治與中國共產黨的法治概念之間的防火牆。中國的法律觀念不包括任何獨立的法院，並把法院、國安部門以及黨的規則 （黨規則亦有時相當模糊）完全混在一起。這就是為甚麼我們最近看到被關起來的加拿大公民被用為人質，反對加拿大本身在她自己國家的法治下所發生的事情。因此，人們如此擔心這修例所帶來的影響並不奇怪。

我知道當人們都正在談到與台灣有關的問題之際，過去幾年的香港大律師公會領導人，應該是有十幾位，都已經提出意見，說明你如何就着香港現行的普通法來處理這個問題。

這些修例對香港不利，我認為這些修例所引發的疑問是甚至政府都沒有仔細考慮過的，尤其是對香港經濟重要性和經濟穩定性的影響。我們非常清楚在經濟和商業方面是需要把香港與中國其他地區分開對待。很久以前，當我還是港督的時候，我經常前往華盛頓游說對方看待香港的時候要跟對待深圳和上海之類的中國城市有所不同。但是如果以北京的角度看香港，將香港當為另一個普通中國城市，那麼世界各地的政府及企業將會視香港為中國的一部分（而不是特區），就算是看待「一帶一路」之類倡議時亦會是如此。這對香港的生活水平和生活質素都是非常不利的！

當然，最重要的是如果香港政府繼續硬推這些引渡修例，這將會在香港引起不必要的憂慮和焦慮。這些都是非常糟糕的事情。我希望即使在這個最後階段，政府仍然可以退讓，撤回方案，不要再添亂。這修例不需要通過，亦不應該通過，香港應該繼續是一個有法治、有自由的社會，而不應該面對這些令人憂心的引渡修例。

《SSSS.GRIDMAN》
UNION
作詞：大石昌良
作曲：大石昌良
編曲：Tom-H@ck
歌：OxT
翻譯：CH

版權聲明:
本頻道不握有任何音樂所有權，亦無任何營利，一切僅為推廣用途。音樂所有權歸原始創作者所有。請支持正版。

Copyright Info:
Be aware this channel is for promotion purpose only without any illegal profit. All music's ownership belongs to the original creators.
Please support the original creator.

すべての権利は正当な所有者/作成者に帰属します。あなたがこの音楽（または画像）の作成者で、この動画に使用されたくない場合はメッセージまたはこのYoutubeチャンネルの概要のメールアドレスにご連絡ください。私はすぐに削除します。

如果你喜歡我的影片，不妨按下喜歡和訂閱，你的支持就是我創作的最大原動力！
If you like my videos, please click like and subscribe! Thx :)

粉絲團隨時獲得最新訊息！
https://www.facebook.com/chschannel/

Check my Facebook page for more information!
https://www.facebook.com/chschannel/

背景 / Background :
https://i.imgur.com/u3itMIC.jpg

翻譯連結 / Referenced Translation :
https://home.gamer.com.tw/creationDetail.php?sn=4191229

日文歌詞 / Japanese Lyrics :
目を醒ませ 僕らの世界が何者かに侵略されてるぞ


作り物のようなこの日々に
僕らのS.O.Sが加速する
何かが違うと知りながら
見慣れた空　同じ景色に今日が流れてく


あの日の誓いってなんだっけ
教室で何を語ってたっけ
このままじゃ約束まで消えてしまう


目を醒ませ 僕らの世界が何者かに侵略されてるぞ
これは訓練でも　リハーサルでもない
覆われた日常というべールを　勢いよく剥がしたら
戦いの鐘が鳴る
それじゃとりあえず同盟を結ぼうか


君を“退屈”から救いに来たんだ！


ニセモノみたいな思い出に
「昔は良かった」って指を差す
虚しいだけと知りながら
悟ったフリ　見て見ぬフリで傷を隠してく


ヒーローになれやしないんだって
主人公は誰かやるでしょって
知らぬ間に諦めたりしないでよ


目の前の僕らの世界は何ものにも代えられない世界
それは子供も大人も関係ない
繰り返す日常というルールに　騙されそうになったら
反旗を翻そう
さあ僕たちだけの革命を起こそうか


A wish, wish come true 夜の星に願いを
君とつなげた夢のUNION


目を醒ませ 僕らの世界が何者かに侵略されてるぞ
これは訓練でも　リハーサルでもない
覆われた日常というべールを　勢いよく剥がしたら
戦いの鐘が鳴る
あの頃のように同盟を結ぼうか


君を“退屈”から救いに来たんだ！

中文歌詞 / Chinese Lyrics :
快醒來吧！我們的世界正在被什麼人侵略！


在這猶如設定般的日常中
我們發出的S.O.S也正加速傳出
雖然已知周圍的一切有所不同
但在這一如往常的天空、同樣的景色下，今天又流逝而過


那一天所發下的誓言是什麼？
在教室裡又說了些什麼？
再這樣下去就連約定都要消失了


快醒來吧！我們的世界正在被什麼人侵略！
這既不是訓練，也不是彩排
若是將那被名為「日常」包裹著的面紗，趁勢的扯下
戰鬥的鐘聲將會響起
總之先讓我們結成同盟吧


為了將你自無趣之中，拯救出來而來


對著猶如虛假般的回憶
「過去真的很美好呢」自己背地裡嘲弄著
雖然明白這麼做僅是徒然
卻仍裝作理解、裝作看穿一切似地，將傷口隱藏起來


說自己絕對成不了英雄什麼的
說英雄總會有別人來當什麼的
不要在不知不覺間放棄啊！


在我們面前的是什麼東西都取代不了的世界
不論你是小孩還是大人都無關緊要
若是被這稱之為「反覆的日常」的規則給欺騙的話
就舉起反抗的旗幟吧！
掀起一場只屬於我們的革命吧！


「期盼這份心願能夠成真。」向著夜晚的星空許下願望
這夢想的同盟，將你我聯繫在一起


快醒來吧！我們的世界正在被什麼人侵略！
這既不是訓練，也不是彩排
若是將那被名為「日常」包裹著的面紗，趁勢的扯下
戰鬥的鐘聲已經敲響
讓我們像「那時候」一樣，結成同盟吧！


為了將你自無趣之中，拯救出來而來

英文歌詞 / English Lyrics :
Open your eyes! Our world is being invaded by something!


On these fabricated-like days,
Our S.O.S signals are being sent rapidly
Knowing that there is something different
About the familiar sky...the usual scenery...the passing day.


What was the promise that day?
What did you talk about in the classroom?
As it is, that promise will end up disappear!


Open your eyes! Our world is being invaded by something!
This is neither a training nor a rehearsal!
Peeling off the "everyday" cover
And the bell that signals the fight rings!
Well then, for now, let us become one alliance!


I have come to save you from "boredom"


To those fake-like memories,
"Things were better in the past" - pointing out with your finger
Knowing how vain my action is,
I still pretend to not see those scars you hide behind the facade.


I did not want to be a hero,
The protagonist should have been someone else!
Don't just unknowingly give up!


Within our views, are our world that cannot be replaced by anything.
It doesn't matter if you are a child or an adult,
Don't be deceived by that day-repeating rule!
Let's raise the flag of resistance!
Now, we shalll make a revolution!


A wish, wish come true, upon praying to a star at night.
To connect with you, the dream of UNION.


Open your eyes! Our world is being invaded by something!
This is neither a training nor a rehearsal!
Peeling off the "everyday" cover
And the bell that signals the fight rings!
Just like back then, let us become one alliance!


I have come to save you from "boredom"

Link to Upbra: upbra.com/babe.php

$10 off coupon code if you want to get one for yourself: TIFFUPBRA10D


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


We are a pair of sisters from Singapore and we post a video on YouTube every week! :D

我们是来自新加坡的姐妹花，每周都会发视频哦～ 我们的视频，都会尽量加上中文字幕，方便大家都理解，所以记得订阅支持我们


GET TO KNOW US BETTER AT:
Tiffanie - http://instagram.com/iamtiffanie
Michy - http://Instagram.com/linmixue
FACEBOOK PAGE - https://www.facebook.com/TiffWithMi/
Collaborations/Advertising - tiffwithmi@gmail.com