關於 evidence of identity ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

Greetings to everyone! I am Hua Vi Van, an actor from Vietnam 🇻🇳. I am writing to confirm that this is my only official Facebook page, with the blue verification badge. This is also my only presence on social media. Besides this Facebook page, and my manager’s company e-mail, I do not use any other communication channels. I am writing this to notify all of my international friends and followers, all the way from Hong Kong, Malaysia, Thailand, China, Ecuador, South Africa, Australia, and so on. They are my international friends present on this Facebook page, who have informed me the presence of fake accounts representing my name, using my photos and personal data to engage in fraudulent actions. I regret that these issue have happened, and I sincerely hope that your loss has been recovered, or at least not too significant. As we live in a hi-tech era, I think we should always stay vigilant and be careful to trust anyone without proper evidence and verification of identity. We could verify an identity behind a Facebook account with such measures as video-calls, to find out whether the person behind the screen is truly your family members, friends or acquaintances, or not. My only advice to ones facing a significant damage is to seek help from authorized agents. Forces such as cybersecurity police could help identify the ones behind these frauds and schemes. Similar cases have been successfully resolved by Vietnam’s government before.
My hope is that, through these events, we will stay more alert and avoid any other similar issues. Hopefully, my local fans in Vietnam will be delighted to know that our international friends have finally been able to follow and communicate with the official account of a Vietnamese actor, and to get to know the person behind our favorite movies better personally. I am thankful of all your support for the movies I participate in and my work. I wish for you all the best and may health and happiness come to you. Love you all from my heart! Hua Vi Van -------------- Xin chào, tôi là Hứa Vĩ Văn, là diễn viên Việt Nam và đây là page chính thức có tích xanh trên facebook và cũng là trang duy nhất của tôi trên mạng xã hội, ngoài ra tôi không sử dụng bất kì một liên lạc nào khác ngoài email của quản lý công ty của tôi. Nay tôi viết bức thư này gởi đến các bạn ở các nước như Hongkong, Malaysia, Thailand , China, Ecuador, Nam Phi, Úc... các bạn quốc tế có trên facebook này của tôi với lý do các bạn đã cung cấp cho tôi thông tin hơn 2 năm nay có người giả mạo sử dụng hình ảnh của tôi với các nick name khác nhau để lừa các bạn và sau này các bạn mới biết sự thật rằng người giả mạo lừa đảo đó đã sử dụng hình ảnh của một diễn viên Việt Nam là tôi. Tôi rất lấy làm tiếc về điều này và hy vọng các bạn không bị quá nhiều tổn thất. Ở thời buổi hiện đại 4.0 tôi nghĩ để lấy được niềm tin của người khác phải có bằng chứng xác minh danh tánh rõ ràng, chúng ta nên xem xét rõ nhất facebook hoặc số điện thoại thật giả bằng video call là tốt nhất để có thể biết rằng người đó có thật hay không. Tôi có lời khuyên thế này, nếu những ai bị hại tổn thất ở mức độ nào đó nghiêm trọng nên trình báo với cảnh sát sở tại nước của bạn, tôi tin rằng cảnh sát an ninh mạng sẽ tìm ra hung thủ giấu mặt này mà chính phủ Việt Nam chúng ta đã từng làm được. Tôi hy vọng qua câu chuyện này sẽ mong các bạn sẽ không bị những khuất mắt nào nữa và tất cả khán giả của tôi ở Việt Nam sẽ rất vui khi biết rằng các bạn nay đã biết đến anh chàng diễn viên Việt Nam này ở đây rõ hơn và người thật trong bức hình mà bạn đã từng tin tưởng yêu quý, hy vọng các bạn sẽ có dịp xem được các bộ phim tôi đóng. Chúc sức khoẻ và may mắn đến tất cả. Yêu thương mọi người. Hua Vi Van ❤️

#木的小事町 #1111

每逢雙十一節，許多電商百貨大打折扣的日子，四個1代表著單身沒有伴侶，單身者在這天以「我單身，我驕傲」來慶祝！然而，單身者真的能在社會上自在地感到認同嗎？生活中有沒有哪裡仍然存在者對單身者的微歧視（Microagression）？

💡這裡指的單身狀態泛指自願單身或非自願單身唷！

📍什麼是微歧視（Microagression）
指的是對少數群體所帶有的偏見或歧視行為，在生活中以價值觀、行動、話語等方式表現。

社會對於成年單身者的微歧視不少，從華人逢年過節隔壁阿姨、親朋好友的噓寒問暖便可發現，例如：

💣「你28啦？什麼時候要嫁？」
（os:阿姨我單身欸你有事嗎?29怎麼了嗎？）
💣「工作幾年啦？什麼時候要結婚？」
（os:我工作幾年跟我要結婚有什麼關係嗎？而且我單身）
💣「都這麼大了，有沒有男朋友/女朋友？」
（os:所以幾歲以後的標準配備是男/女友一枚？）
💣「難道你想要當一輩子牡丹？」
（os：#%^&凸｜)

📍單身者所受到的微歧視
在一篇關於單身者的研究中發現，單身族群相較民族、非單身者較難被以「群體」來看待，彼此之間的認同感也較低。過往的研究也發現，在單身者身上常被貼上自我中心、不成熟、不負責任等標籤。

由此可見，一個人有沒有遵循社會既定的生命週期帶來的影響不容小覷，學者們更發現，有無成家與交往在社會上受到的關注已超越個人的性別角色、事業成就。

也就是說，無論你今天多麽事業有成，別人看到你沒成家、沒伴侶，依舊先扣分（話說太重）。

會這樣子是來自於社會從古至今頌揚著婚姻制度，男大當婚女大當嫁，有伴未婚壓力大，沒伴未婚是不是要天打雷劈😅單身男女承載著極大的壓力，好像全世界都把眼光放在你的感情上，殷切的想幫你找對象，仔細想想，這個「為你好」的背後正隱含著成雙成對的價值觀。

🥂「交往、訂婚、結婚有紀念日，單身也要狂歡慶祝！」

在針對單身者的所做的幾個訪談中，發現單身者感受到的自由度與生活滿意度有關聯，也就是說，當一個人越能為自己的人生做選擇，對個人生涯的滿意度越高。

一切都是回到對生命的選擇與自由感，無論你想不想單身，在今天這個單身日，為這個專屬節日舉杯慶祝吧！

歡迎tag那個你身邊的單身朋友！

#singlehood #single #光棍 #雙十一 #郭玟秀諮商心理師 #黃旻諮商心理師

參考文獻：
Fisher, A. N., & Sakaluk, J. K. (2020). Are single people a stigmatized ‘group’? Evidence from examinations of social identity, entitativity, and perceived responsibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 86, 103844.

My recent article😎😎😎

https://m.orangenews.hk/details?recommendId=138868

Opinion｜The Police is duty-bound to enforce the law resolutely

HK Current

2020.10.06 11:05

By Athena Kung

According to the statement made by the US Department of State on 3rd of October 2020 (local time), the arrests made by the Hong Kong Police on 1st of October 2020 were criticized by the Department as malicious ones. It has been alleged by the US Department of State that the Hong Kong Police merely enforces the law for the aim of achieving political goals, which amounts to serious violation of Hong Kong's rule of law and thus strongly attack individual's human rights as well as Hong Kong people's freedom of expression, procession and assembly. The Central Government was commented by the US Department of State as being given up the undertaking of "One country, Two systems" completely. Obviously, such allegations against both the Central Government and HKSAR made by US Government were very serious. To examine whether such comments were fair ones, we have to carefully consider if the allegations really have any valid legal basis or foundation.

According to both the Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance, Cap. 383, Laws of Hong Kong (hereinafter referred to as "the BORO“) and and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (hereinafter referred to as the "ICCPR "), the freedoms of expression, procession and assembly were not absolute, and might be subject to restrictions as prescribed by law. Article 16 and 17 of the BORO relates to the freedom of opinion and expression and right of peaceful assembly which can be enjoyed by Hong Kong people:
"Article 16
Freedom of opinion and expression
(1) Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.
(2) Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.
(3) The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph (2) of this article carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary—
(a) for respect of the rights or reputations of others; or
(b) for the protection of national security or of public order (ordre public), or of public health or morals.
[cf. ICCPR Art. 19]

Article 17
Right of peaceful assembly
The right of peaceful assembly shall be recognized. No restrictions may be placed on the exercise of this right other than those imposed in conformity with the law and which are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, public order (ordre public), the protection of public health or morals or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.
[cf. ICCPR Art. 21]"

Thus, freedom of expression, procession and assembly in Hong Kong are not absolute. On the other hand, such rights are subject to restrictions as prescribed by law in the interests of public order, public safety and the interests of others, and so on.

Besides, Section 10(a) to (e) of the Police Force Ordinance, Cap 232, Laws of Hong Kong has clearly stated inter alia that:
"10. The duties of the police force shall be to take lawful measures for—
(a) preserving the public peace;
(b) preventing and detecting crimes and offences;
(c) preventing injury to life and property;
(d) apprehending all persons whom it is lawful to apprehend and for whose apprehension sufficient grounds exists;
(e) regulating processions and assemblies in public places or places of public resort;
…………"

What has really occurred in Hong Kong in various districts on 1st of October 2020?
(1) At around 1400 hours, a group of people gathered and yelled along Great George Street in Causeway Bay, which might have constituted offences related to unauthorised assemblies under the Public Order Ordinance, Cap 245, Laws of Hong Kong and offences related to prohibited group gatherings under the Prevention and Control of Disease (Prohibition on Group Gathering) Regulation, Cap 599G, Laws of Hong Kong. Even though the Police had given multiple warnings at the scene and raised the blue flag requesting participants to leave the scene, at around 1500 hours, a large group of protesters still remained at the same place. Some of them even commenced to chant the slogan “Liberate Hong Kong, Revolution of Our Times” over and over again. Thus, they were suspected of inciting or abetting others to commit acts of secession, which might constitute relevant offences under the HKSAR National Security Law. Afterwards, some protesters even spilled onto the road and breached public peace.

(2) At around 1500 hours, 2 men in the vicinity of Tin Ma Court in Wong Tai Sin hurled some petrol bombs and large objects at Lung Cheung Road. Having attended the scene, the police noticed that traces of the road being charred, as well as fences and traffic cones left on it. After investigation, the Police found that even though a large amount of vehicles were travelling along the road at the time of the incident, fortunately, no vehicle was hit by the petrol bombs and objects successfully. In any event, the rioters’ such heinous acts had severely endangered road users and breached public peace.

(3) The Police intercepted a man at Stewart Road in Wanchai at about 1600 hours and found him in possession of a foldable sharp knife which was at the same size of a business card. The 23-year-old man was subsequently arrested on suspicion of possession of an offensive weapon, as there stood a strong likelihood that he might intend to use the said item to injure members of the public or police officers.

(4) At around 1500 hours, the Police set up a roadblock along a section of the Tuen Mun Road near Summit Terrace in Tsuen Wan to intercept suspicious vehicles, and found extendable sticks, a helmet, face masks and a large amount of promotional leaflets inside a private car with an expired vehicle licence. Some of the leaflets contained slogans suspected of calling for “Hong Kong independence” written on them. The 35-year-old male driver of the car was arrested on suspicion of various offences including “Possession of Instrument Fit for Unlawful Purpose”, “Driving an Unlicenced Vehicle” and “Driving Without Third Party Insurance”.
(5) At around 1630 hours, the Police stopped and searched a man in the vicinity of Tonnochy Road and Lockhart Road in Causeway Bay, and found items including a cutter, a spanner, plastic straps and a pair of gloves in his backpack. The 20-year-old man was subsequently arrested on suspicion of possession of offensive weapons.
(6) After nightfall, protesters continued to gather in different districts. To ensure public safety, the Police have enforced the law resolutely according to the situations arising in different districts. At 2200 hours, not less than 86 persons have been arrested in multiple districts. Among them, 74 persons including four District Councillors were arrested on suspicion of taking part in unauthorised assemblies in Causeway Bay, while the rest were arrested on suspicion of committing offences including possession of offensive weapon, failing to produce proof of identity, possession of forged identity card, disorderly conduct in a public place and driving an unlicenced vehicle. Besides, 20 persons were given fixed penalty notices for suspectedly breaching the Prevention and Control of Disease (Prohibition on Group Gathering) Regulation.

Actually, the Police is duty-bound to enforce the law resolutely. On the facts, all arrests taken place on 1st of October 2020 were absolutely lawful and necessary to maintain law and order in the society and protect the life and property of all Hong Kong residents. Undoubtedly, the US officials have all along been adopting "double standards" in expressing utterly irresponsible remarks on law enforcement actions in the HKSAR. Everyone is equal before the law. So long as there is evidence supporting that someone has violated the law, no matter what his or her status or background is, he or she must face the legal consequence. Being a law enforcement agency, the Police must take action whenever they come across any unlawful acts in strict accordance with the laws in force. All cases must be handled in a fair, just and impartial manner by the Police in accordance with the law, which is the only and real reason as to why the Police arrested the 86 odd people on 1st of October 2020. To conclude, all criticizms made by the US towards the Hong Kong Police, HKSAR Government and Central Government were all unfair without any legal or concrete support at all.

It appears that the US government has always been refusing to accept the truth that the HKSAR is an inalienable part of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "the PRC") and a local administrative region which enjoys a high degree of autonomy, as contrary to absolute autonomy, and comes directly under the Central People's Government. Hong Kong affairs are internal matters of the PRC. The system in Hong Kong is not "Two countries, Two systems". Hong Kong will never be an independent country with a pro-American government formed by the Opposition Camp in Hong Kong. Any foreign governments like the US must at once stop scaremongering and interfering in any form in Hong Kong's affairs. The "Colour Revolution" promoted by the US in Hong Kong should be terminated in no time.

The author is Barrister-at-law.

The views don't necessarily reflect those of Orange News.

責編： CK Li

#'92年にサン電子が発売した、FC用横スクロールアクション作品。
世間がSFC発売に沸き立ち、FCが世代交代をしようとする中発売された作品であり、知名度は低く、中古市場でもかなりの高額で取引されている。

主人公のゆめたろーはぬいぐるみと間違われ、とある女の子の元へ。とても気に入られたもののその事が周囲のおもちゃ達の反感を買い女の子は彼らに拉致される羽目に。ゆめたろーの救出劇が今始まった。

BGMはアウトライブ(PCE/'89年)や、弁慶外伝(PCE/'89年)などの影山氏が作曲、DPCMを使ったベースとPSG互換の拡張音源「Sunsoft5B」によるサンソフトならではの響きはコナミのVRC7に匹敵するほど。
楽曲はフュージョン風なサウンドから、ポップス、アシッドな曲、ファンタジーな曲、ロック調な曲、映画主題歌のようなEDなど、様々な方向性のサウンドでまとめ上げられている。
ジャズバンドなどでサックスを演奏していた過去がある影山氏ならではのアドリブの入れ方も心地良い。

当時のFCゲームのBGMはアルペジオで作られた物が殆どだったが、それを覆い尽くし、子供達に音楽自体に興味を持って貰いたかったという影山氏は、本作を「自分にとってゲームミュージックの集大成」という言葉で締めている。

ドライバ制作：諸田直久氏
作曲：影山雅司氏

manufacturer: 1992.01.31 sunsoft
Hardware: RP2A03(APU)+SUNSOFT 5B
computer: family computer
Music Driver Programmer: Naohisa Morota
Composer: Masashi Kageyama
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
00:00 01.GOOD MORNING (タイトルデモ)
01:20 02.NO LIMITS (全体マップ)
02:15 03.HAPPY BIRTHDAY (1面)
05:23 04.JUST FRIENDS (隠しアイテム部屋)
07:58 05.APORIA (1～4面ボス、5～6面中ボス)
10:26 06.GOOD WEATHER (2面)
13:16 07.SLOW ILLUSION (3面)
16:10 08.PARADOX (3面後半)
16:45 09.PARADIGM (4面)
19:07 10.LION HEART (5面)
22:28 11.INNOCENT (6面)
23:11 12.CADBURY (6面後半)
26:44 13.IDENTITY BELIEVER (5～6面ボス)
29:01 14.SIESTA (バッドエンディング)
29:47 15.SOPHIA (TAKE 2) (7面)
33:05 16.EVIDENCE OF MY LIFE (ラスボス第一形態 *サウンドテスト未収録)
33:28 17.LONG TOMORROW (ラスボス第二形態)
35:07 18.GOOD NIGHT (TAKE 2) (グッドエンディング)
36:48 19.STRANGE MEMORIES OF DEATH (サウンドテストのみ)
40:02 20.Cadbury (Alt)(6面後半 *別ver.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------

On Taiwan Hashtag hosted by Ross Feingold, we discuss the release from
prison in Hong Kong of Chan Tong-kai 陳同佳, wanted in Taiwan for the
murder of Poon Hui-wing 潘曉穎. The now withdrawn Extradition Bill in Hong
Kong was originally proposed by the Hong Kong government to extradite
Chan to Taiwan in the absence of a bilateral extradition agreement.
Despite Chan’s apparent willingness to return to Taiwan, Hong Kong’s
government has rejected the conditions demanded by Taiwan’s government
which include the exchange of Chan’s testimony and other evidence that
Hong Kong police and prosecutors may have obtained from Chan. Taiwan has
also required that Chan and Reverend Peter Koon Ho-ming, who is willing
to accompany Chan to Taiwan, present themselves at Taiwan’s
representative office in Hong Kong for a visa interview, to confirm
Chan’s identity and due to Koon’s status as a Chinese People’s Political
Consultative Conference representative. Taiwan government statements
continue to evolve on whether Hong Kong has jurisdiction over Chan for
the murder charge. Unnecessary conditions by Taiwan? Unnecessary
politicization of the matter? Unnecessary delay of justice? Watch our
show for latest analysis.

✓ 快來加入《Taiwan Hashtag》Twitter（ID：@TaiwanHashtag）
✓ 點我加入《風傳媒》Line 好友（ID：@dyp8323m）　http://bit.ly/2hETgWE
✓ 點我訂閱《風傳媒》YouTube 頻道　http://bit.ly/2grkAJ6
✓ 點我追蹤《下班經濟學》IG頻道（ID：@worked_money） https://bit.ly/2WZ1Dnb

【Facebook粉絲團】
風傳媒►► https://www.facebook.com/stormmedia
風生活►► https://www.facebook.com/SMediaLife
下班經濟學►►https://www.facebook.com/workedmoney

泰國官方報導，性工作者中,80%以上是性病帶菌者,此影片純以遊客角度探討曼谷淫業、色情行業陷阱及破解方法。

請用片右下角調高清睇片。
https://youtu.be/-ZuZ0J_wh3U

Also watch:

秋葉原行街,吹水講下日本召妓收費 和酒吧種類Akihabara and tell you charges for prostitution in Japan

https://youtu.be/aRNNp7lAsQs

Souce from Wikipedia:
Prostitution in Thailand has been common in modern Thailand and its predecessor states for centuries. During the Ayutthaya Kingdom (1351–1767), prostitution was legal and taxed,[1]:2 and the state ran brothels.[2] Since 1960, prostitution in Thailand has been de jure illegal. Nevertheless, it was estimated to be worth US$6.4 billion a year in revenue (2015), accounting for a significant portion of the national GDP.[3]

Sex worker perspectives
Were it not for financial pressures, there is evidence that most sex workers would not choose the work. In Sweden and the Netherlands, where prostitution is "...legal, protected, lucrative and safe,..." it is not a popular profession. Greece provides a recent example of the correlation between prostitution and economic destitution: researchers there estimate that the number of people selling sexual services in Greece has soared by 150 percent since the Greek market collapse in 2008.[81] Many sex workers in those countries are imported from south and Southeast Asia. One Thai university student doing sex work to support herself lamented to an interviewer that "my life doesn't give me choices".[82] The president of Thailand's Foundation for Women notes that, "These women may well have the capacity to separate their sex work from their self-identity." In the words of one of the sex workers she interviewed, "Once I met my customer on a street, he tried to approach me. But I ignored him. What right does he have? Outside a brothel, I am a normal woman."[82]

Some "sex workers" claim that actual sex is a minor part of their occupation. An independent sex worker in Chiang Mai says, "...most of her job is having drinks with customers, only involving sex two or three times a month. Akin to a 'professional girlfriend', ...sex workers provide...company to middle class or foreign men. In return, clients will buy her clothing, take her to watch movies...."[82]

Reasons for the prevalence and toleration of prostitution
Social views
Thai society has its own unique set of often contradictory sexual mores. Visiting a prostitute or a paid mistress is not an uncommon, though not necessarily acceptable, behaviour for men. Many Thai women, for example, believe the existence of prostitution actively reduces the incidence of rape.[14] Among many Thai people, there is a general attitude that prostitution has always been, and will always be, a part of the social fabric of Thailand.[14]

According to a 1996 study, the sexual urge of men is perceived by both Thai men and women as being very much stronger than the sexual urge of women. Where women are thought to be able to exercise control over their desires, the sexual urge of men is seen to be "a basic physiological need or instinct". It is also thought by both Thai men and women that men need "an occasional variation in partners". As female infidelity is strongly frowned upon in Thai society, and, according to a 1993 survey, sexual relationships for single women also meets disapproval by a majority of the Thai population, premarital sex, casual sex and extramarital sex with prostitutes is accepted, expected and sometimes even encouraged for Thai men, the latter being perceived as less threatening to a marriage over lasting relationships with a so-called "minor wife".[57]

Another reason contributing to this issue is that ordinary Thais deem themselves tolerant of other people, especially those whom they perceive as downtrodden. This acceptance has allowed prostitution to flourish without much of the extreme social stigma found in other countries. According to a 1996 study, people in Thailand generally disapprove of prostitution, but the stigma for prostitutes is not lasting or severe, especially since many prostitutes support their parents through their work. Some men do not mind marrying former prostitutes.[58] A 2009 study of subjective well-being of prostitutes found that among the sex workers surveyed, sex work had become normalized.[59].....

ウィキペディアのソース：
アユタヤ王国（1351〜1767）では、売春は合法で課税され[1]：2、州は売春宿を経営していました。タイでは法的に違法であり、見通しとしては、年間収益64億米ドル（2015年）に相当すると推定されており、国内GDPのかなりの部分を占めています。

セックスワーカーの視点
経済的圧力がなければ、ほとんどのセックスワーカーは仕事を選択しないという証拠があります。売春が「...合法、保護、有利、安全」であるスウェーデンとオランダでは、人気がありません。職業：ギリシャは、売春と経済的貧困の相関関係の最近の例を提供します：研究者は、ギリシャで性的サービスを販売する人々の数が2008年のギリシャ市場の崩壊以来、150％急増していることを示しています。自分自身をサポートするためにセックスワークをしている大学生の一人は、「私の人生は私に選択肢を与えてくれない」とインタビュアーに嘆き悲しんだ。[82]タイの女性財団の会長は、「これらは女性は、セックスワークを自己同一性から分離する能力を持っているかもしれません。」彼女がインタビューしたセックスワーカーの一人の言葉で、「通りで顧客に会ったら、彼は私に近づこうとしました。しかし、私は彼を無視しました。わ売春宿の外では、私は普通の女性です。」[82].....