關於 google latex ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

【#小马四点日记 0819】

➊.#LPPL

有些人会用「我做了360度的转变」来形容自己，但360度是转回到原点，因为是转了一大圈。所以，应该是180度才对。而我们的新政府，很可能是360度的转变。

巫统副主席 #依斯迈沙比里，盛传已经获得足够的支持，出任首相。114名国会议员，今天受邀到王宫觐见最高元首，以确认他们是否真的支持这位前副首相。网络上，似乎哀嚎一片。

有人在 www.change.org 发出请愿书「We don't want Ismail Sabri Yaakob to be prime minister Malaysia」，目前已经有近15万人联署。但，这应该无法改变什么，因为连选票都做不了主，这个只能是在拼最后的一丝力气，但也反映出民间的心声。

盛传，前首相慕尤丁，也将受委为内阁资政，有人形容这犹如“垂帘听政”，新政府将沦为傀儡政府。而如果都是同样班底，来来去去都是那几个人担任部长，副部长，大家又快快乐乐在一起，对他们来说真的是圆满的大结局，但对人民来说，很可能是史诗悲剧。

在Google Search LPPL是 LaTeX Project Public License。而LPPL是什么意思，你自己体会啊。

▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️

➋. #雪隆将关闭部分接种中心

网络流传一份雪州疫苗接种中心将关闭的名单，10个疫苗接种中心，将在大后天分阶段关闭。这让很多还没接种的人担心，是不是未来很难再接种疫苗。

新冠肺炎免疫特工队（CITF）是说，他们还没敲定接下来要关闭的中心名单，要大家稍安勿躁。但可以肯定的是，为了节省开支和人手，部分已经充分接种疫苗的地方，可能真的可以减少。理性思考，他没有一直存在的必要，反而更应该把这些资源投入在其他的州。

我家乡柔佛州，包括我哥一家人，都还没接到疫苗通知。而雪隆大部分人都已经完成接种，接下来应该在其他地方加快脚步。当然，还是要再三提醒，疫苗不是仙丹，你还是会有感染和传染的风险。

▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️

➌. #22242新病例

昨天再新增22,242新病例，很多2的一长串数字。新的确诊病例中，83.8%的病患，没接种过疫苗。可见，群体疫苗是极其重要的一个步骤。

美国现在打算让民众接种第三剂疫苗，因为他们发现原本的疫苗效力，随时间下降，对Delta的保护力较弱，所以计划下个月开始追打第3剂，与第2剂间隔，须达到8个月的时间。

关紧国门，防护Delta大举入侵，是现在的重中之重。要依赖我们的（新）政府与政策，有难度。

▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️

➍. #天不可一日无日

早安你好，今天会更好，我是小马。来跟我打声招呼吧～

天不可一日无日，国不可一日無君。当然，这个君说的是国家的政府。无政府状态对一个体制国家一点好处都没有，所以，最迟希望在星期五就能有新的领导者。

但，更多人担心的是，会是一个崩坏的政府。很多人也开始情绪化，看到不是自己喜欢的新闻，就开口大骂。但，事实无法改变，我们也只能争取。

希望马来西亚会更好。我们值得更好。

▫▫▫▫▫▫

#看完记得帮我LIKE和SHARE #感恩

📜 [專欄新文章] Uniswap v3 Features Explained in Depth

✍️ 田少谷 Shao

📥 歡迎投稿： https://medium.com/taipei-ethereum-meetup #徵技術分享文 #使用心得 #教學文 #medium

Once again the game-changing DEX 🦄 👑

Image source: https://uniswap.org/blog/uniswap-v3/

Outline

0. Intro1. Uniswap & AMM recap2. Ticks 3. Concentrated liquidity4. Range orders: reversible limit orders5. Impacts of v36. Conclusion

0. Intro

The announcement of Uniswap v3 is no doubt one of the most exciting news in the DeFi place recently 🔥🔥🔥

While most have talked about the impact v3 can potentially bring on the market, seldom explain the delicate implementation techniques to realize all those amazing features, such as concentrated liquidity, limit-order-like range orders, etc.

Since I’ve covered Uniswap v1 & v2 (if you happen to know Mandarin, here are v1 & v2), there’s no reason for me to not cover v3 as well ✅

Thus, this article aims to guide readers through Uniswap v3, based on their official whitepaper and examples made on the announcement page. However, one needs not to be an engineer, as not many codes are involved, nor a math major, as the math involved is definitely taught in your high school, to fully understand the following content 😊😊😊

If you really make it through but still don’t get shxt, feedbacks are welcomed! 🙏

There should be another article focusing on the codebase, so stay tuned and let’s get started with some background noise!

1. Uniswap & AMM recap

Before diving in, we have to first recap the uniqueness of Uniswap and compare it to traditional order book exchanges.

Uniswap v1 & v2 are a kind of AMMs (automated market marker) that follow the constant product equation x * y = k, with x & y stand for the amount of two tokens X and Y in a pool and k as a constant.

Comparing to order book exchanges, AMMs, such as the previous versions of Uniswap, offer quite a distinct user experience:

AMMs have pricing functions that offer the price for the two tokens, which make their users always price takers, while users of order book exchanges can be both makers or takers.

Uniswap as well as most AMMs have infinite liquidity¹, while order book exchanges don’t. The liquidity of Uniswap v1 & v2 is provided throughout the price range [0,∞]².

Uniswap as well as most AMMs have price slippage³ and it’s due to the pricing function, while there isn’t always price slippage on order book exchanges as long as an order is fulfilled within one tick.

In an order book, each price (whether in green or red) is a tick. Image source: https://ftx.com/trade/BTC-PERP

¹ though the price gets worse over time; AMM of constant sum such as mStable does not have infinite liquidity

² the range is in fact [-∞,∞], while a price in most cases won’t be negative

³ AMM of constant sum does not have price slippage

2. Tick

The whole innovation of Uniswap v3 starts from ticks.

For those unfamiliar with what is a tick:

Source: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/tick.asp

By slicing the price range [0,∞] into numerous granular ticks, trading on v3 is highly similar to trading on order book exchanges, with only three differences:

The price range of each tick is predefined by the system instead of being proposed by users.

Trades that happen within a tick still follows the pricing function of the AMM, while the equation has to be updated once the price crosses the tick.

Orders can be executed with any price within the price range, instead of being fulfilled at the same one price on order book exchanges.

With the tick design, Uniswap v3 possesses most of the merits of both AMM and an order book exchange! 💯💯💯

So, how is the price range of a tick decided?

This question is actually somewhat related to the tick explanation above: the minimum tick size for stocks trading above 1$ is one cent.

The underlying meaning of a tick size traditionally being one cent is that one cent (1% of 1$) is the basis point of price changes between ticks, ex: 1.02 — 1.01 = 0.1.

Uniswap v3 employs a similar idea: compared to the previous/next price, the price change should always be 0.01% = 1 basis point.

However, notice the difference is that in the traditional basis point, the price change is defined with subtraction, while here in Uniswap it’s division.

This is how price ranges of ticks are decided⁴:

Image source: https://uniswap.org/whitepaper-v3.pdf

With the above equation, the tick/price range can be recorded in the index form [i, i+1], instead of some crazy numbers such as 1.0001¹⁰⁰ = 1.0100496621.

As each price is the multiplication of 1.0001 of the previous price, the price change is always 1.0001 — 1 = 0.0001 = 0.01%.

For example, when i=1, p(1) = 1.0001; when i=2, p(2) = 1.00020001.

p(2) / p(1) = 1.00020001 / 1.0001 = 1.0001

See the connection between the traditional basis point 1 cent (=1% of 1$) and Uniswap v3’s basis point 0.01%?

Image source: https://tenor.com/view/coin-master-cool-gif-19748052

But sir, are prices really granular enough? There are many shitcoins with prices less than 0.000001$. Will such prices be covered as well?

Price range: max & min

To know if an extremely small price is covered or not, we have to figure out the max & min price range of v3 by looking into the spec: there is a int24 tick state variable in UniswapV3Pool.sol.

Image source: https://uniswap.org/whitepaper-v3.pdf

The reason for a signed integer int instead of an uint is that negative power represents prices less than 1 but greater than 0.

24 bits can cover the range between 1.0001 ^ (2²³ — 1) and 1.0001 ^ -(2)²³. Even Google cannot calculate such numbers, so allow me to offer smaller values to have a rough idea of the whole price range:

1.0001 ^ (2¹⁸) = 242,214,459,604.341

1.0001 ^ -(2¹⁷) = 0.000002031888943

I think it’s safe to say that with a int24 the range can cover > 99.99% of the prices of all assets in the universe 👌

⁴ For implementation concern, however, a square root is added to both sides of the equation.

How about finding out which tick does a price belong to?

Tick index from price

The answer to this question is rather easy, as we know that p(i) = 1.0001^i, simply takes a log with base 1.0001 on both sides of the equation⁴:

Image source: https://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php

Let’s try this out, say we wanna find out the tick index of 1000000.

Image source: https://ncalculators.com/number-conversion/log-logarithm-calculator.htm

Now, 1.0001¹³⁸¹⁶² = 999,998.678087146. Voila!

⁵ This formula is also slightly modified to fit the real implementation usage.

3. Concentrated liquidity

Now that we know how ticks and price ranges are decided, let’s talk about how orders are executed in a tick, what is concentrated liquidity and how it enables v3 to compete with stablecoin-specialized DEXs (decentralized exchange), such as Curve, by improving the capital efficiency.

Concentrated liquidity means LPs (liquidity providers) can provide liquidity to any price range/tick at their wish, which causes the liquidity to be imbalanced in ticks.

As each tick has a different liquidity depth, the corresponding pricing function x * y = k also won’t be the same!

Each tick has its own liquidity depth. Image source: https://uniswap.org/blog/uniswap-v3/

Mmm… examples are always helpful for abstract descriptions 😂

Say the original pricing function is 100(x) * 1000(y) = 100000(k), with the price of X token 1000 / 100 = 10 and we’re now in the price range [9.08, 11.08].

If the liquidity of the price range [11.08, 13.08] is the same as [9.08, 11.08], we don’t have to modify the pricing function if the price goes from 10 to 11.08, which is the boundary between two ticks.

The price of X is 1052.63 / 95 = 11.08 when the equation is 1052.63 * 95 = 100000.

However, if the liquidity of the price range [11.08, 13.08] is two times that of the current range [9.08, 11.08], balances of x and y should be doubled, which makes the equation become 2105.26 * 220 = 400000, which is (1052.63 * 2) * (110 * 2) = (100000 * 2 * 2).

We can observe the following two points from the above example:

Trades always follow the pricing function x * y = k, while once the price crosses the current price range/tick, the liquidity/equation has to be updated.

√(x * y) = √k = L is how we represent the liquidity, as I say the liquidity of x * y = 400000 is two times the liquidity of x * y = 100000, as √(400000 / 100000) = 2.

What’s more, compared to liquidity on v1 & v2 is always spread across [0,∞], liquidity on v3 can be concentrated within certain price ranges and thus results in higher capital efficiency from traders’ swapping fees!

Let’s say if I provide liquidity in the range [1200, 2800], the capital efficiency will then be 4.24x higher than v2 with the range [0,∞] 😮😮😮 There’s a capital efficiency comparison calculator, make sure to try it out!

Image source: https://uniswap.org/blog/uniswap-v3/

It’s worth noticing that the concept of concentrated liquidity was proposed and already implemented by Kyper, prior to Uniswap, which is called Automated Price Reserve in their case.⁵

⁶ Thanks to Yenwen Feng for the information.

4. Range orders: reversible limit orders

As explained in the above section, LPs of v3 can provide liquidity to any price range/tick at their wish. Depending on the current price and the targeted price range, there are three scenarios:

current price < the targeted price range

current price > the targeted price range

current price belongs to the targeted price range

The first two scenarios are called range orders. They have unique characteristics and are essentially fee-earning reversible limit orders, which will be explained later.

The last case is the exact same liquidity providing mechanism as the previous versions: LPs provide liquidity in both tokens of the same value (= amount * price).

There’s also an identical product to the case: grid trading, a very powerful investment tool for a time of consolidation. Dunno what’s grid trading? Check out Binance’s explanation on this, as this topic won’t be covered!

In fact, LPs of Uniswap v1 & v2 are grid trading with a range of [0,∞] and the entry price as the baseline.

Range orders

To understand range orders, we’d have to first revisit how price is discovered on Uniswap with the equation x * y = k, for x & y stand for the amount of two tokens X and Y and k as a constant.

The price of X compared to Y is y / x, which means how many Y one can get for 1 unit of X, and vice versa the price of Y compared to X is x / y.

For the price of X to go up, y has to increase and x decrease.

With this pricing mechanism in mind, it’s example time!

Say an LP plans to place liquidity in the price range [15.625, 17.313], higher than the current price of X 10, when 100(x) * 1000(y) = 100000(k).

The price of X is 1250 / 80 = 15.625 when the equation is 80 * 1250 = 100000.

The price of X is 1315.789 / 76 = 17.313 when the equation is 76 * 1315.789 = 100000.

If now the price of X reaches 15.625, the only way for the price of X to go even higher is to further increase y and decrease x, which means exchanging a certain amount of X for Y.

Thus, to provide liquidity in the range [15.625, 17.313], an LP needs only to prepare 80 — 76 = 4 of X. If the price exceeds 17.313, all 4 X of the LP is swapped into 1315.789 — 1250 = 65.798 Y, and then the LP has nothing more to do with the pool, as his/her liquidity is drained.

What if the price stays in the range? It’s exactly what LPs would love to see, as they can earn swapping fees for all transactions in the range! Also, the balance of X will swing between [76, 80] and the balance of Y between [1250, 1315.789].

This might not be obvious, but the example above shows an interesting insight: if the liquidity of one token is provided, only when the token becomes more valuable will it be exchanged for the less valuable one.

…wut? 🤔

Remember that if 4 X is provided within [15.625, 17.313], only when the price of X goes up from 15.625 to 17.313 is 4 X gradually swapped into Y, the less valuable one!

What if the price of X drops back immediately after reaching 17.313? As X becomes less valuable, others are going to exchange Y for X.

The below image illustrates the scenario of DAI/USDC pair with a price range of [1.001, 1.002] well: the pool is always composed entirely of one token on both sides of the tick, while in the middle 1.001499⁶ is of both tokens.

Image source: https://uniswap.org/blog/uniswap-v3/

Similarly, to provide liquidity in a price range < current price, an LP has to prepare a certain amount of Y for others to exchange Y for X within the range.

To wrap up such an interesting feature, we know that:

Only one token is required for range orders.

Only when the current price is within the range of the range order can LP earn trading fees. This is the main reason why most people believe LPs of v3 have to monitor the price more actively to maximize their income, which also means that LPs of v3 have become arbitrageurs 🤯

I will be discussing more the impacts of v3 in 5. Impacts of v3.

⁷ 1.001499988 = √(1.0001 * 1.0002) is the geometric mean of 1.0001 and 1.0002. The implication is that the geometric mean of two prices is the average execution price within the range of the two prices.

Reversible limit orders

As the example in the last section demonstrates, if there is 4 X in range [15.625, 17.313], the 4 X will be completely converted into 65.798 Y when the price goes over 17.313.

We all know that a price can stay in a wide range such as [10, 11] for quite some time, while it’s unlikely so in a narrow range such as [15.625, 15.626].

Thus, if an LP provides liquidity in [15.625, 15.626], we can expect that once the price of X goes over 15.625 and immediately also 15.626, and does not drop back, all X are then forever converted into Y.

The concept of having a targeted price and the order will be executed after the price is crossed is exactly the concept of limit orders! The only difference is that if the range of a range order is not narrow enough, it’s highly possible that the conversion of tokens will be reverted once the price falls back to the range.

As price ranges follow the equation p(i) = 1.0001 ^ i, the range can be quite narrow and a range order can thus effectively serve as a limit order:

When i = 27490, 1.0001²⁷⁴⁹⁰ = 15.6248.⁸

When i = 27491, 1.0001²⁷⁴⁹¹ = 15.6264.⁸

A range of 0.0016 is not THAT narrow but can certainly satisfy most limit order use cases!

⁸ As mentioned previously in note #4, there is a square root in the equation of the price and index, thus the numbers here are for explantion only.

5. Impacts of v3

Higher capital efficiency, LPs become arbitrageurs… as v3 has made tons of radical changes, I’d like to summarize my personal takes of the impacts of v3:

Higher capital efficiency makes one of the most frequently considered indices in DeFi: TVL, total value locked, becomes less meaningful, as 1$ on Uniswap v3 might have the same effect as 100$ or even 2000$ on v2.

The ease of spot exchanging between spot exchanges used to be a huge advantage of spot markets over derivative markets. As LPs will take up the role of arbitrageurs and arbitraging is more likely to happen on v3 itself other than between DEXs, this gap is narrowed … to what extent? No idea though.

LP strategies and the aggregation of NFT of Uniswap v3 liquidity token are becoming the blue ocean for new DeFi startups: see Visor and Lixir. In fact, this might be the turning point for both DeFi and NFT: the two main reasons of blockchain going mainstream now come to the alignment of interest: solving the $$ problem 😏😏😏

In the right venue, which means a place where transaction fees are low enough, such as Optimism, we might see Algo trading firms coming in to share the market of designing LP strategies on Uniswap v3, as I believe Algo trading is way stronger than on-chain strategies or DAO voting to add liquidity that sort of thing.

After reading this article by Parsec.finance: The Dex to Rule Them All, I cannot help but wonder: maybe there is going to be centralized crypto exchanges adopting v3’s approach. The reason is that since orders of LPs in the same tick are executed pro-rata, the endless front-running speeding-competition issue in the Algo trading world, to some degree, is… solved? 🤔

Anyway, personal opinions can be biased and seriously wrong 🙈 I’m merely throwing out a sprat to catch a whale. Having a different voice? Leave your comment down below!

6. Conclusion

That was kinda tough, isn’t it? Glad you make it through here 🥂🥂🥂

There are actually many more details and also a huge section of Oracle yet to be covered. However, since this article is more about features and targeting normal DeFi users, I’ll leave those to the next one; hope there is one 😅

If you have any doubt or find any mistake, please feel free to reach out to me and I’d try to reply AFAP!

Stay tuned and in the meantime let’s wait and see how Uniswap v3 is again pioneering the innovation of DeFi 🌟

Uniswap v3 Features Explained in Depth was originally published in Taipei Ethereum Meetup on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

👏 歡迎轉載分享鼓掌

White sweater with Latex socks & Red high heels album is available~

buy album link: http://ko-fi.com/yuanyp411,

Price list refer in the photo.(Is worth to buy ,and price are much low price than others). AND remember put the code name when you buy~ (if not will consider as you donate me coffee)

After that, will send you the google drive within 4-7days

购买链接: http://ko-fi.com/yuanyp411

白高领与黑皮袜的hot 相册终于正式售卖~~

记得查看价格才购买，已经是低价了，如果跟其它比较的话。

还有记得放CODE NAME，不然当成你只是捐咖啡~~

我会在4-7天之内发送链接给你~~

SUBSCRIBE →　http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=rinrindolly
I have a sub channel! → http://www.youtube.com/rinrindoll2

SUGARPILL COLLAB → https://youtu.be/M4JcZo6LOSU

Autumn
http://instagram.com/autumotiv
Amy Doan
http://instagram.com/shrinkle


Check out Sugarpill!
https://sugarpill.com
http://www.youtube.com/sugarpill


★ Makeup Used ★
Sugarpill Cosmetics
https://sugarpill.com


★ Today’s COORD ★
Jacket: Trixie Mattel handmade
Necklace: Mantrap 1989
Belt: Jane Doe Latex
Hat: Phi Phi O'Hara handmade
Color Contacts: loveil - Ash grege
Hair: Hair Salon NALU http://www.nalu-style.com


★ Recommended Videos ★
Tanuki Makeup
https://youtu.be/Uy-UiO4SKQQ
♡Sweet Romantic Makeup♡
https://youtu.be/l5up7oc4Kk4


★ RinRin Doll LINE Stamps ★
Rabbit Cat / Cat Rabbit
http://line.me/S/sticker/1229244


★ Collaboration Goods ★
RinRin Doll x galaxxxy
Collaboration Clothes
http://galaxxxy.joe-inter.co.jp/?mode=grp&gid=1299720&sort=n

RinRin Doll x VIVID VIVRANT
Collaboration Eyelashes
Hello Candy Heart Doll (White Purple)
http://vvv.fashionstore.jp/items/675126
http://vvv.fashionstore.jp/items/712839
Dear Carousel Dreams Doll (Purple Blue)
http://vvv.fashionstore.jp/items/707860
http://vvv.fashionstore.jp/items/707899
Oh! My Starry Eyed Doll (White Black)
http://vvv.fashionstore.jp/items/675125
http://vvv.fashionstore.jp/items/712791
Yum Sugar Cupcake Doll (Pink Blue)
http://vvv.fashionstore.jp/items/675127
http://vvv.fashionstore.jp/items/712838


★ FOLLOW ME ★
http://www.rinrindoll.com
Instagram：http://instagram.com/rinrindoll
Facebook：https://www.facebook.com/rinrindoll
Twitter：https://twitter.com/rinrin_doll
Snapchat: rinrin_doll
Google+：https://plus.google.com/+rinrindoll
Tumblr：http://rinrindoll.tumblr.com
Ameblo : http://ameblo.jp/angel-rinrin


************************************
★ Disclaimer ★
This is not a sponsored video.

★ Music ★
YouTube Audio Library

★ Captions ★
Submit captions here!
여기에 한국어 자막을 제출!
請提供中文字幕！
http://www.youtube.com/timedtext_cs_panel?tab=2&c=UCDRWhpjy_lU_phS3O31AjRQ