這次真的很多朋友很上道,去看了電影Po的票根,但有些是高雄的朋友,水壺你就可能沒有辦法來拿,所以幾個傳票根跟上來在高雄的朋友,歡迎你們常來互動然後下次我送全台票的時候要告訴我,我會給你們豁免權
恭喜下列五個人
黃珊、李斐迪 蘇子文 黃楚涵
陳賢聰 余秀意 林鳳雪
真的只能說,阿諾是我童年到現在的記憶,魔鬼終結者系列從我國中看到現在,阿諾即便連任加州州長失利,重返影壇,還是那麼的”老當益壯“,73歲然舊是一尾活龍,最新續集《魔鬼終結者:黑暗宿命》(Terminator: Dark Fate) 首波觀眾迴響&評價已正式解禁,社群網站上已可見到粉絲們各種熱情的心得與討論。這部終結者系列的第六部電影「T6」的誕生,徹底改變先前作品的系列架構,成為接續 1991 年《魔鬼終結者 2:審判日》(Terminator 2: Judgment Day) 的正宗續集;而系列班底阿諾史瓦辛格 (Arnold Schwarzenegger)、《審判日》莎拉康納 (Sarah Connor) 的演員琳達漢彌頓 (Linda Hamilton) 等經典面孔也都再次登場。特別是琳達66歲了一樣打很兇! 還為此鍛鍊了一年,不得不佩服他們的敬業,電影11月8號上映,本周很多電影要搶票房,有一場硬仗要打,但我相信阿諾穩得啦
請大家挺一波,好電影幫忙分享
😂😂😂按例如果你很常來留言互動,不是只抽獎才來,卻一次也沒抽到的朋友,請讓我知道,給你豁免權喔千萬拜託,很常來留言的朋友,中獎機率一定很高的!!
已經有訂票或到時看了電影po票根上來的朋友
肯定拿到這個禮物的機會更高啦
已經有人跟我檢舉之前有些被選到的人,背地裡在賣,我也已經拿到證據交給片商了,小心啊,你在來抽去賣,一定會被告,希望大家是為了愛看電影跟周邊而來的!!!!
▍參加贈品活動 ▍
1. 按讚加入狄志偉臉書粉絲團,告訴我為什麼想要魔鬼終結者周邊商品
請不要複製貼上
2. @你喜歡電影的朋友,一起來搶《魔鬼終結者:黑暗宿命》周邊品
(EX: @朋友的名字,一起去來搶《魔鬼終結者:黑暗宿命》周邊品
3.公開分享在朋友看得到的臉書
▍贈品資訊 ▍
🎞 《魔鬼終結者:黑暗宿命》周邊品
得獎後需自行取物或寄回郵來取
📣須知:
1.千萬不要拿去賣會被告 也會被我封鎖
2活動時間
即刻起 至11/10晚上八點
3.好看幫忙寫觀後感好口碑散出去
4. 活動內容如有調整,會再行公佈(通知)
5. 得獎名單將於原文留言處公佈,請自行留意,恕不另行通知
6.得獎者到時可以到tvbs內湖瑞光路451號取物或回郵來取
博偉影業
迪士尼影業尼
#魔鬼終結者黑暗宿命
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoHnttmspB8
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過55萬的網紅3cTim哥生活日常,也在其Youtube影片中提到,Oris aquis 雷達 Captain Cook 浪琴浪鬼限定版與一般版 現在Podcast也可以聽得到Tim哥的科技午報了 https://apple.co/2IupRwH 訂閱Tim哥生活副頻道⬇︎ http://bit.ly/36gDKs7 加入頻道會員⬇︎ http://bit...
「hamilton watch 評價」的推薦目錄:
- 關於hamilton watch 評價 在 狄志為 Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於hamilton watch 評價 在 喬靖夫 Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於hamilton watch 評價 在 3cTim哥生活日常 Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於hamilton watch 評價 在 [心得] 開箱-Hamilton卡其航空W10復刻軍錶- 看板watch 的評價
- 關於hamilton watch 評價 在 開箱Hamilton機械錶- 精品板 - Dcard 的評價
- 關於hamilton watch 評價 在 Hamilton漢米爾頓聽到廣大錶友的聲音了! 38毫米精巧版的 ... 的評價
- 關於hamilton watch 評價 在 hamilton手錶評價的推薦與評價,DCARD、YOUTUBE 的評價
- 關於hamilton watch 評價 在 hamilton手錶評價的推薦與評價,DCARD、YOUTUBE 的評價
- 關於hamilton watch 評價 在 HAMILTON錶的主人~~~請來蓋大樓吧!! - Mobile01 的評價
- 關於hamilton watch 評價 在 Hamilton 機械錶PTT-推薦/討論/評價在PTT、Dcard 的評價
- 關於hamilton watch 評價 在 Hamilton 機械錶PTT-推薦/討論/評價在PTT、Dcard 的評價
- 關於hamilton watch 評價 在 HAMILTON錶的主人~~~請來蓋大樓吧!! | Hamilton 手錶PTT 的評價
- 關於hamilton watch 評價 在 [心得] 漢米爾頓Hamilton爵士開心系列開箱:D - Mo PTT 的評價
- 關於hamilton watch 評價 在 漢米爾頓白熊貓 - PTT評價 的評價
- 關於hamilton watch 評價 在 [問題] 漢米爾頓HAMILTON 北部店家推薦PTT推薦- watch 的評價
- 關於hamilton watch 評價 在 台灣漢米爾頓 - Facebook 的評價
hamilton watch 評價 在 喬靖夫 Facebook 的精選貼文
【A.I. FOREVER】在Youtube看到的一篇很長的comment,寫得非常詳細,從數據上比較其他偉大球星,檢視Iverson的職業生涯表現,給予他更公正的評價。
(by sportsmed77)
[+Kareem Elwakil Those other posters shouldn't have insulted you to make their points, but I think your arguments are extremely weak. The only thing you bring up is that AI's career FG% was 42% and that he jacked up "30 shots" to get his points. His FG% was technically 42.5% for his career (Tracy McGrady's was 43% and Kobe Bryant's was 45%, which really isn't that much higher relatively speaking by the way) and a lot of AI's missed shots had to do with the team he was playing on and how their offense was structured, his role on the team as the only scorer, etc. but I won't get into that. AI averaged about 21 shots per game for his career, by the way. Hardly the 30 shots per game you tried to give him credit for. AI led the NBA in scoring 4 times, and out of those for times, only twice did he also lead the league in field goal attempts (and not by much - plus he averaged more free throws than everyone else) so the argument that "if anyone shot as much as AI did, they would score as much too" clearly is not the case. In his prime, Tracy McGrady averaged about 23 shots per game, Kobe Bryant also about 23 shots per game, and AI also about 23 shots per game. AI, Kobe, and Jordan all had a season where they shot the ball 27 times per game. Per 36 minutes, AI only averaged 19 shots per game for his career (keep in mind, AI played more minutes than anyone else each game during his era). Michael Jordan averaged 23 shots per game for his entire career. For his career, Jerry West averaged 20 shots per game and in his prime, it was about 22 shots per game. Before Lebron James got there, Dwayne Wade was averaging between 20 and 22 shots per game for a few seasons because he was the go-to option. You know what all of these players have in common with AI? They were all SHOOTING GUARDS and the go-to option! They were supposed to shoot! Some SGs are volume shooters who slash and get to the free throw line. Some of them have lower FG% but still are productive for their teams. Other SGs have a higher efficiency, but a player's FG% really depends on a number of factors you haven't even taken into consideration.
To reiterate this point, for most of AI's career, he was a SHOOTING GUARD. I hate when people compare him to point guards and then act like he was worse than them because he didn't play like a PG. It is ridiculous because it is like comparing apples with oranges. By the way, you brought up Jason Kidd and how he was so much "better" than AI. Did you know Jason Kidd's career FG% is 40%? He had 10 seasons where he shot below 40% for the season. AI only shot below 40% for 1.5 seasons and his career FG% is higher than J-Kidd's. J-Kidd averaged 12 PPG for his career and only 2.8 free throw attempts. AI averages about 27 PPG for his career. So just as you can say J-Kidd was a way better passer than AI, I can say AI was a way better scorer than J-Kidd. They had different roles and they excelled in their roles. Jason's job was to pass, and AI's job was to create shots.
It is a myth that AI was not a good passer. AI averaged 6.2 assists per game for his career. That is good for a SG - more than Kobe, more than MJ, more than Vince Carter, more than Tracy McGrady, more than Wade, etc. AI had about 5 or 6 seasons where he averaged between 7 and 8 assists per game while still scoring 26+ points. It is impressive. He had an entire season where he averaged 33 PPG and 7.4 APG with 2 steals on 45% shooting and a TS% of over 54%, and people like you try to say he was just "okay at best"? AI had a unique style, especially for his size and was probably one of the top 5 most exciting players to watch. To say he was not "that good" shows that you likely saw very few AI games. I would say AI is a top 20-30 player all-time. Anyone who actually saw, for example, his 2001 play-offs and regular season run, would know that he was amazing and did so much for that team and if someone looks at the stat box, they will not get the actual story. You had to have seen the games with your own eyes. With AI, stats have always been misleading. I also want to point out that AI's True Shooting % (TS%) is slightly higher than Isiah "Zeke" Thomas and is pretty decent (at about 52%). He had a couple of seasons in Denver where his TS% was almost 57%. TS% is a much more accurate depiction of someone's accuracy when shooting. You know why? Because it takes into account free throws among other factors. AI is one of the greatest players of all-time at getting to the free throw line, and unlike Lebron James and many others, he didn't flop to do it. He was legitimately fouled, hurt, and referees even admitted to conspiring against him and purposely not calling fouls on players who fouled him when they should have. Yet AI is still 10th all-time in free throws made. He was a slashing, fearless guard with incredible talent and an ability to create shots for himself that very few other players have been able to do. His style of play is more comparable to Kobe Bryant or Tracy McGrady (Kobe had a better career, but in AI's prime there were seasons where they were almost equally good). Yet he is 160 lbs. soaking wet so he is an anomoly because small players aren't supposed to be able to do what he does. The two years AI's shooting percentage was the lowest in Philly, he had just come off of a serious elbow surgery (2001-2002) and had played with a broken hand another season. You put so much emphasis on his accuracy those seasons, but what about his heart? How many players would play with the injuries he had? I guarantee you not many. Even while in Denver, Carmelo said AI was playing with a broken finger the entire season. In the 2001 play-offs by the end of the 2nd round, AI had 7 injuries (serious elbow bursitis, knee bursitis, dislocated shoulder, sprained thumb, hip pointer, bruised tailbown, and twisted ankle). Yet he played, and he played his heart out contributing to his team in other ways even when he couldn't find his shooting rhythm due to the pain he was in. I watched every game he played in back then (even taped them so I could immitate some of his moves since I played ball). I would know.
I am definitely convinced that anyone who claims Iverson was an "extremely poor shooter" either did not watch him play or knows a lot less about basketball than they think they know. AI was not a poor shooter. He took incredibly difficult shots - often times while double and triple teamed, and given that he was smaller than everyone else, it is incredible that he still made some of them. He was a shot creator. He was immensely creative. Larry Brown even used to sit on the sidelines and call out to AI to shoot the ball more and create shots. Even George Karl in Denver once told AI to shoot the ball more, stop being so UNSELFISH, and take over games the way he used to in Philly. Unfortunately the media doesn't like to talk about that. Not one of AI's teammates thought he was selfish. I have seen very few players who are as loved and respected by his former teammates and former peers as AI. The amount of love he gets from everyone from Dr. J, Maurice Cheeks, Moses Malone, Kobe Bryant, Lebron James, Dwayne Wade, Carmelo Anthony, Aaron McKie, Eric Snow, Theo Ratliff, Dikembe Mutombo, Chris Webber, Kyle Korver, Chris Paul, James Harden, Larry Brown, Paul Pierce, John Thompson, Andre Iguodala, Larry Hughes, Bill Walton, Rip Hamilton, Rasheed Wallace, Shawn Marion, Steve Nash, Dirk Nowitzki, Shaquille O'Neal, etc. etc. etc. I can go on and on. Many of these very players have called AI "pound for pound the greatest." I have seen very few players get so much love and adoration by their peers. I was at AI's jersey retirement and heard what so many players around the league past and present had to say about him and it was just insane. I also have never heard one of AI's former teammates call him a bad teammate. They loved him and loved playing with him. It is the media that tries to paint that picture, but his peers and former teammates paint a completely different picture.
What the media says is a myth. AI's former coaches and teammates and peers adore him. In 2001, AI had the most first place MVP votes in history (tied with Shaq) and became the smallest player to ever win the MVP award. You think he is overrated? I guarantee you the people who vote on MVP, the players, the coaching staff, etc. know far more about AI's contributions to the sport, how good he was, etc. than you do. He deserves what he got. Every accomplishment he achieved, he did it despite immense adversity. He is 7th All-Time in PPG, 4th All-Time in Minutes Played, 7th All-time in Steals, won 1st Team All-NBA multiple times... this man played with so much heart and believed in himself so much that you had to believe in him. This man is up there with MJ, Kobe, Wilt, and players of that caliber for most 40 and 50 point games in his career. I hate when people try to take away from his accomplishments rather than appreciating him for what he accomplished at his size and what he brought to the game. He is the reason I played basketball at all. He gave little people hope. He is a cultural icon. I really wish people would stop with the "AI is overrated" nonsense. If your peers think that highly of you to call you "pound for pound the greatest," then obviously you did something right. ]
#alleniverson #theanswer #ai3 #onlythestrongsurvive #sixers #76ers #bubbachuck #basketballneverstops
hamilton watch 評價 在 3cTim哥生活日常 Youtube 的最佳解答
Oris aquis 雷達 Captain Cook 浪琴浪鬼限定版與一般版
現在Podcast也可以聽得到Tim哥的科技午報了
https://apple.co/2IupRwH
訂閱Tim哥生活副頻道⬇︎
http://bit.ly/36gDKs7
加入頻道會員⬇︎
http://bit.ly/2LoUuox
我的Line@生活圈⬇︎
@237mhhsl
訂閱3cTim哥主頻道⬇︎
http://bit.ly/2MgPy4H
訂閱Tim嫂頻道⬇︎
http://bit.ly/2PEnHMZ
訂閱眾點旅人頻道⬇︎
http://bit.ly/2QaY1vS
訂閱Jade Lin林瑋婕頻道⬇︎
http://bit.ly/2D2YK8O
想知道更多3C第一手資訊?⬇
【3cTim哥趨勢預測 系列】http://bit.ly/31y57M6
【Apple 蘋果每月一爆 系列】http://bit.ly/2KPzdEd
跟Tim哥學3C小技巧⬇
【Apple蘋果小技巧 系列】http://bit.ly/2NXsIyP
【Android安卓小技巧 系列】http://bit.ly/2LE4kWy
觀看3cTim哥Apple系列影片⬇
【Apple蘋果開箱】http://bit.ly/2LE4M6R
【Apple iPhone 系列】http://bit.ly/2Z6NwsO
【Apple iPad 系列】http://bit.ly/303gknn
【Apple Mac 系列】http://bit.ly/2N5Fkqo
【Apple Watch 系列】http://bit.ly/304F5jc
【Apple其他產品 系列】http://bit.ly/2MioZiN
觀看3cTim哥Android系列影片⬇
【Android安卓高階旗艦機 系列】http://bit.ly/2LDGSZx
【Android安卓中階手機 系列】http://bit.ly/2Z1Y4JP
【Android安卓萬元以下手機 系列】http://bit.ly/2z5qF6l
觀看3cTim哥開箱影片⬇
【3cTim哥家電開箱】http://bit.ly/2v49Uai
【3cTim哥電腦開箱】http://bit.ly/2n0UM8Z
追蹤3cTim哥即時動態⬇︎
instagram☛http://bit.ly/2HCZ52j
facebook☛http://bit.ly/2JyOGGK
TIM X OLI 🛍️ 3C購物
官方網站▶️ https://goo.gl/jW7cny
App Store▶️ https://goo.gl/67foDK
Google PlayStore▶️ https://goo.gl/l6B5Zp
*圖片內容截取自Google搜尋網站
**音樂與音效取自Youtube及Youtube音樂庫
hamilton watch 評價 在 開箱Hamilton機械錶- 精品板 - Dcard 的推薦與評價
開箱Hamilton機械錶 ... 下午到錶店直接說要Hamilton的Murphy 二話不說就掏出信用卡刷下去了它外盒素素的還滿有質感的感覺只印著它牌子的英文. ... <看更多>
hamilton watch 評價 在 Hamilton漢米爾頓聽到廣大錶友的聲音了! 38毫米精巧版的 ... 的推薦與評價
38毫米精巧版的Murph墨菲卡其野戰腕錶強勢回歸! 新萬國鐘錶Hsin Wuan Kuo Watches. ... <看更多>
hamilton watch 評價 在 [心得] 開箱-Hamilton卡其航空W10復刻軍錶- 看板watch 的推薦與評價
大家好!一月一開箱的feb我又來了!(十月開箱文達標!)
趁著國慶假期來開箱我趁周年慶入手的新玩具吧!
Hamilton (漢米爾頓) Khaki Pilot Pioneer Mechanical。
我認為它真的是 CP 值超高,又非常原汁原味的一支復刻老軍錶
圖文網誌版先奉上:
https://medium.com/watch-girl/hamilton-khaki-pilot-pioneer-w10-1855fd1ab209
不想看網誌的就往下看開箱囉!內容大概90%雷同請放心閱讀
=====++++++=====+++++=====+++++=====
直接進開箱吧!首先是黑色的外盒
黑色紙箱打開後,裡面是淺色木紋貼皮的紙盒
底下有個小夾層放置說明書及保卡
木紋貼皮的質感很不錯
箱子也小小的,不太占收納空間。
打開錶盒就是錶啦!
錶盒的內裡是人造皮,皮質一般般
錶枕軟硬適中、且固定得很牢
手錶固定在裡面不需要擔心滑來滑去或鬆動掉落。
漢米爾頓目前屬於 SWATCH 集團
可說是平價軍錶中最為人所熟知的品牌之一
其軍錶可以分為三個系列:
Khaki Navy 卡其海軍系列 (海軍)
Khaki Field 卡其野戰系列 (陸軍)
Khaki Aviation 卡其航空系列 (空軍)等共三個系列
這支漢米爾頓 Pilot Pioneer Mechanical
屬於 Khaki Aviation 卡其航空系列
是復刻漢米爾頓在1973年為英國空軍生產的飛行軍錶 W10
外觀上除了維持原版的鮑魚殼之外,也留下了凸風防的老錶特色
只是風防材質由壓克力改成了強化礦物玻璃
相較於壓克力更加耐刮耐撞。
而我個人是親身驗證了這個風防真的夠耐摔……
因為我在拍照時,一度不慎將它從胸口左右的高度滑落
風防玻璃直接朝下「啪」地摔到地面
當場嚇得我魂飛魄散……
不過撿起來一看,風防既沒有碎也沒有任何刮痕
證明這個「強化玻璃」的抗磨抗撞擊能力是真的不錯。
但我希望以後不要再親身作這種實驗了……
這支復刻版 W10 在外觀上幾乎完全複製了1973年的 W10的外觀
僅在面盤上作了些許更動,取消了 Broad Arrow 軍用徽章及 T Logo。
畢竟現行復刻版已經不再是政府財產及軍用手錶
也不再使用具有放射性的夜光塗料 Tritium,而以Super-Luminova取代之
故將錶面的 Broad Arrow 軍用徽章及 T Logo 移除,十分合理
但除此之外,它其餘的元素則幾乎毫無更動,非常原汁原味。
1970 年代當時並未如近十年來流行 40 mm 以上的大錶徑
反而多數男錶的錶徑集中在 34 mm 到 38 mm 之間
是以這支復刻版 W10 它維持了原版 36 mm 的錶徑,在現今審美觀中男女皆宜
也讓我可以很無違和地配戴它。
在此也補充一些官網沒有講得很詳細的細節。詳細的數據實為:
● 錶殼含錶冠 36 mm寬
● 錶殼不含錶冠 33 mm寬
● 錶面直徑 (圓形區域) 30 mm
● lug to lug 長 41 mm 。
這支錶的錶面是黑色的顆粒,很像柏油路的質感
這是我非常喜愛的一點,讓這支錶有舊舊的古味
指針中間、軌道圈上的每個時標點及12點鐘下方的三角標,都有夜光塗料
夜光表現一般般,指針的亮度似乎比時標的亮度更亮一些,每次看都是如此。
接下來來看一些微距鏡頭下的細節
雖說是入門價位的錶,但它在錶殼的打磨上也有一定水準
照片可以看到錶殼側面有一道倒角
並且從錶殼正面、倒角及錶殼側面共用了三個不同方向的拉絲打磨作出區隔
很值得細細觀看
霧面黑色的柏油路顆粒面更是讓我拍照拍到停不下來
我非常喜歡這種錶面營造出的古老作舊味道
浮凸的 HAMILTON 及下方的 MECHANICAL 字樣也顯得很立體。
指針的打磨也很OK,沒有毛邊。
這個價位我認為做到這樣就有及格了XD
類似價位我曾買過指針有明顯毛邊的CW錶,令人哭笑不得
錶扣也是簡單但有質感的拉絲打磨,整體風格十分一致
個人認為這原廠 NATO 錶帶的質感相當不錯,兼具厚實與柔軟
有些副廠 NATO 帶雖然厚實硬挺,但在配戴時會不夠服貼
以致戴起來顯得手錶很大一包
若要讓視覺上顯得不那麼擁腫就必須戴很緊,配戴感並不好。
但這條原廠 NATO 錶帶並沒有這樣的問題
扣到最裡面的洞剛剛好符合我 14.5 cm 的小手腕
錶扣亦剛剛好落在手腕正中間,配戴起來兼具美觀及舒適
拆下錶帶翻到錶背,可以看到底蓋也有漂亮的拉絲打磨
刻著 HAMILTON、瑞士製造、100米防水、以及軍錶編號之類的字樣。
不過這支錶雖然標榜100米防水,但錶冠並非鎖入式
因此個人還是建議不要讓它泡到水或淋雨。
最後,這支復刻版 W10 搭載的機芯的是 H-50 手上鍊機芯
改自 SWATCH 集團通用機芯 ETA2801–2
除了防水由30米提升至100米外,動力儲存也提升到非常實用的80小時。
而這支手上鍊機芯最令我驚豔的是,
調整時間時指針咬合的齒輪的緊密手感
以及手上鍊時的清脆噠噠聲及非常有彈性的反饋感。
玩機械錶有一段時間的朋友
應該都多少能感受到自動上鍊機芯與手上鍊機芯在上鍊時截然不同的感受
自動上鍊機芯在上鍊時多為沙沙聲或嘰嘰聲
而手上鍊機芯通常會有較清脆以及回彈的手感
不同品牌的手上鍊機芯手感更是各有千秋,可謂風情萬種。
以這顆 H-50 機芯來說,其手上鍊清脆響亮的噠噠聲
上鍊時緊致回彈的機械手感非常銷魂
可以直接被我列為最喜愛的手上鍊機芯手感前三名。
我真的非常高興漢米爾頓在復刻這支 W10 老軍錶時
沒有選擇迎合時下的大錶風潮而去等比例放大這支錶
因為原始的它就是如此美好
0.9 mm 的纖薄錶殼、36mm寬的錶殼及僅有 41 mm 的錶耳間距
讓細腕的錶友和女性錶友都能輕易駕馭
霧面黑色面盤及復古的仿舊奶色時標讓它整體在視覺上是低調的
搭配 NATO 是十足的休閒風,但若換上復古皮帶要作正裝搭配亦無不可
加上80小時的超高動儲,這支錶 CP 值真的非常高。
這樣的一支錶,我相信你戴著它走在路上並沒有多少人會認得它
但若你是真心愛錶的主人,知道它是這樣細節滿滿且值得把玩的一支錶
僅僅是戴在手上把玩欣賞就已經能感受到巨大滿足
玩錶的路上,我一直比較喜歡孤芳自賞勝過追逐流行
只要很清楚自己喜歡的在意的是什麼,每個價味都有很棒的產品可以玩賞
就不必盲目追求許多其他人都追逐的流行
那麼今天的開箱文就到這邊結束啦!
希望大家看得還過癮,也希望下個月的開箱文也能如期完成
(目前進度是0,連要開箱什麼都沒想法XD)
我是feb,我們下個月見囉!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.169.13.251 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/watch/M.1633963094.A.414.html
而且喜歡老錶之後覺得新錶都太貴了XD
10/12 06:32
但細部照有用外夾式的微距鏡輔助微距
... <看更多>