若有一天,香港失去了《蘋果日報》,希望大家也不要失散。
Apple Daily 英文專欄:
After the media, landlords will be the next target
https://hk.appledaily.com/opinion/20210517/BIW343AKIRHSTGFFTVT4Q26I7I/
This is a game of boiling frogs. Protesters and politicians are the first group of people to be snatched. The message is that “only a small number of people” are targeted. The aim is to create a deterrence effect. I won’t go into detail here as there are only so many column inches. Meanwhile, some outspoken media outlets are being sorted out. For example, leading journalists of the mainstream outlet Cable TV (1097.HK) have resigned en masse not long ago, and Bao Choy, a producer of RTHK’s “Hong Kong Connection”, was prosecuted last month.
In the latest incident, the government has frozen Jimmy Lai’s assets, including 71.26 percent of his shares in Apple Daily’s parent company Next Digital (0282.HK), of which he is the major shareholder, as well as his holdings in three other private companies held in local banks.
After sorting out members of the opposition and media outlets that monitor the government, the focus of the game will be shifted to landlords, in similar vein as the Land Reform launched by Mao Zedong in the 1950s that saw the confiscation of landlords’ land.
Having collected in April a plot of land in Kam Sheung Road from CK Asset (1113.HK) and Henderson Land (0012.HK), citing the Land Resumption Ordinance, the government brandished its sword to Sun Hung Kai Properties (0016.HK) and New World Development (0017.HK), seizing from them plots of land in Yuen Long and Fanling this month, on grounds that it needs to build subsidized housing. So Hong Kong’s four biggest property developers have all got their fair share of being targeted, and Yuen Long rural leaders who gained notoriety in 2019 are not spared either.
Offering rewards based on merits is not an approach the current regime adopts. Following the 1967 riots, the British colonial government rewarded rural villages for showing it support during the riots by launching the Small Housing Policy (also known as the “Ding House Policy”) that took effect in December 1972. But rural leaders today will not see a replay of that. In 2019, they went to great lengths to help the authorities. Alas, some ding house landlords have recently been arrested by the Independent Commission Against Corruption, and some other rural villagers have had their ancestral houses seized by the government on grounds of the Land Resumption Ordinance.
Today, the ordinance can be used to target anyone, and no one can figure out the government’s land seizure strategy. The plots collected by the government are not those that have long remained undeveloped but those with clearly laid out development plans. Apparently, what the government is doing has no logic. On the face of it, it occupies the moral high ground, when in fact it may just want to demonstrate its authority.
On the internal side of things, the Hong Kong government and its disciplinary forces are on life support as they have been deprived of their real power. Externally, politicians, the media, businessmen and the rural elite are being targeted. Who will be the next target? Taking reference from the history of certain political party, one may note that there are not only licensed thugs but also unlicensed ones who are active in the underground economy. Who will call the shot after midnight in Hong Kong tomorrow? What do you think?
In the movie “Men Suddenly in Black”, Ninth Uncle and his buddies secretly went to a nightclub, only to be busted by their wives. To help his brothers flee, Ninth Uncle sacrificed himself. In today’s Hong Kong, who is Ninth Uncle? While you guys are having fun, have you ever spared a thought for Ninth Uncle? Or will you be the next Ninth Uncle?
同時也有3部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過9萬的網紅黎特 KNIGHT,也在其Youtube影片中提到,全新製作的「廉署潮文動畫系列 – 大誠小事講呢啲」,今集話說劉明一直在好旺國做輔政大臣十幾年,一直好地地,直至幫王子舉辦徵婚舞會,就出事了......事不宜遲,即刻去片! 睇完足本動畫,輪到你講多啲!每集一個討論題等你「神回覆」、贏漫畫! 動畫及遊戲網址:http://www.iteencamp...
「independent commission against corruption」的推薦目錄:
- 關於independent commission against corruption 在 中環十一少 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於independent commission against corruption 在 小小人物做小事 - 高松傑Jacky Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於independent commission against corruption 在 歷史時空 Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於independent commission against corruption 在 黎特 KNIGHT Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於independent commission against corruption 在 黎特 KNIGHT Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於independent commission against corruption 在 黎特 KNIGHT Youtube 的精選貼文
independent commission against corruption 在 小小人物做小事 - 高松傑Jacky Facebook 的最佳貼文
My recent article😎😎😎
https://apps.orangenews.hk/app/common/details_html…
Opinion | Ulterior Motives behind Opposition Camp's refusal to recognize HKSAR political system
HK Current
2020.09.03 11:39
By Athena Kung
In fact, the political system adopted by the HKSAR is executive-led. Under this structure, the executive authorities, legislature and judiciary complement each other, with built-in checks and balances.
In the year of 1840, Hong Kong was occupied by Britain after the Opium War. In accordance with the Sino-British Joint Declaration signed on 19th of December, 1984, the Chinese and British Governments had a hand-over ceremony on 1st of July, 1997, which marked the resumption of sovereignty by China over Hong Kong. Meanwhile, the HKSAR of the PRC was formally established. The Hong Kong Basic Law, which was adopted in April 1990 at the Third Session of the Seventh National People's Congress, formally came into effect. The Basic Law clearly states and defines the specifications as to how the high degree of autonomy as well as the political, economic, cultural and educational systems of the HKSAR to be run.
To comply with the Basic Law, since 1st of July 1997, the Chinese government has been carrying out the basic policies of "One country, Two systems," "administration of Hong Kong by the Hong Kong people" and "a high degree of autonomy" in the HKSAR. Under "One country, Two systems", even though China is a unified country and the mainland practices the socialist system, Hong Kong's previous capitalist system before 1st of July 1997 and way of life has been remaining unchanged for 50 years. To properly implement "administration of Hong Kong by the Hong Kong people", the HKSAR has all along been administering by the Hong Kong people on their own, and the central authorities have never sent officials to the HKSAR to fill any local official posts. To fulfill "a high degree of autonomy", apart from foreign and national defense affairs which should be administered by the central authorities, the HKSAR has fully enjoyed the power to decide all other matters within its autonomous jurisdiction. The central authorities has never interfered in affairs within the scope of autonomy of the HKSAR. All along, the HKSAR government has been making the final decisions on all matters within its autonomous jurisdiction as prescribed in the Basic Law.
Under the political system of the HKSAR, its major organs of power include the Chief Executive, the Government, the Legislative Council and the Court of Final Appeal. The Executive Council assists the Chief Executive in policy-making and advises the Chief Executive on matters relating to the introduction of bills and subsidiary legislation. Being independent agencies, both the Commission Against Corruption and the Audit Commission are directly accountable to the Chief Executive. In accordance with the conditions procedures as prescribed by law, the Chief Executive shall have the power to dismiss the legislative organs whereas the legislative organs shall have the power to impeach the Chief Executive and the administrative organs shall be accountable to the legislative organs. The Chief Executive, administrative and legislative organs shall supervise and cooperate with each other, which is however not the separation of powers as described by the Opposite Camps from time to time.
The Chief Executive of the HKSAR is both the head of the HKSAR and the head of the HKSAR government. His or her dual status enables him or her to have extensive functions and powers. The Chief Executive shall be selected from among residents of the HKSAR by election or through consultations held locally, and be appointed by the Central Government. Thus, the Chief Executive who is appointed by the Chinese Government to manage the HKSAR plays a very superior role in the HKSAR political system.
In short, the Chief Executive is responsible for implementing the Basic Law, signing bills and budgets, promulgating laws, making decisions on government policies and issuing Executive Orders. Article 48 of the Basic Law empowers the Chief Executive a variety of powers and functions:
" Article 48
The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall exercise the following powers and functions:
(1) To lead the government of the Region;
(2)To be responsible for the implementation of this Law and other laws which, in accordance with this Law, apply in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region;
(3)To sign bills passed by the Legislative Council and to promulgate laws;
To sign budgets passed by the Legislative Council and report the budgets and final accounts to the Central People's Government for the record;
(4)To decide on government policies and to issue executive orders;
(5)To nominate and to report to the Central People's Government for appointment the following principal officials: Secretaries and Deputy Secretaries of Departments, Directors of Bureaux, Commissioner Against Corruption, Director of Audit, Commissioner of Police, Director of Immigration and Commissioner of Customs and Excise; and to recommend to the Central People's Government the removal of the above-mentioned officials;
(6)To appoint or remove judges of the courts at all levels in accordance with legal procedures;
(7)To appoint or remove holders of public office in accordance with legal procedures;
(8)To implement the directives issued by the Central People's Government in respect of the relevant matters provided for in this Law;
(9)To conduct, on behalf of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, external affairs and other affairs as authorized by the Central Authorities;
(10) To approve the introduction of motions regarding revenues or expenditure to the Legislative Council;
(11)To decide, in the light of security and vital public interests, whether government officials or other personnel in charge of government affairs should testify or give evidence before the Legislative Council or its committees;
(12)To pardon persons convicted of criminal offences or commute their penalties; and
(13)To handle petitions and complaints.
Indeed, the judicial independence plays a vital role to ensure that the acts and policies of the executive and the legislature fully comply with the Basic Law whereas all fundamental rights and freedoms to be enjoyed by all Hong Kong citizens in accordance with the law can be completely safeguarded. However, from the point of view of separation of powers, the relationship between the executive, legislature and judiciary in the HKSAR should be one of mutual-supervision, checks and balances. It is purely a kind of division of work.
The Opposition Camps has been keeping on refusing to recognize the executive leadership role played by the Chief Executive in accordance with the Basic Law. On the other hand, they intentionally and wrongly deny the executive-led political system adopted in the HKSAR so as to weaken the powers, functions and authorities of the Chief Executive. At the same time, they have been trying their best to expand the powers of the Legislative Council. Clearly, the Opposition Camp aims at making a change in the political system of the HKSAR, namely from executive-led to legislative-led in the hope of controlling the whole HKSAR Government once they can obtain more than 35 seats in the Legislative Council Election. Such step is a common strategy adopted in “Colour Revolutions” instigated by the U.S. Government. In reality, the Opposition Camp has been keeping on spreading rumors to provoke the public's hatred towards the Chief Executive so as to crack down the prestige of the executive-led system in the HKSAR and achieve its ultimate goal of Hong Kong Independence.
The author is Barrister-at-law.
The views don't necessarily reflect those of Orange News.
責任編輯:CK Li
編輯:Whon
independent commission against corruption 在 歷史時空 Facebook 的精選貼文
1975年-1998年 那些年香廉政公署廣告綜合。
當年口號 香港勝在有ICAC, 今天是否變得不一樣!?
廉政公署(英語:Independent Commission Against Corruption;縮寫:ICAC),簡稱「廉署」,於1974年2月15日根據《總督特派廉政專員公署條例》(現改名為《廉政公署條例》)成立,是獨立及直接向香港政府首長(香港主權移交前為香港總督,後為行政長官)負責的紀律部隊及執法機構,以肅貪倡廉為目標,一直以來透過執法、預防及教育「三管齊下」的策略打擊貪污。主權移交前名叫總督特派廉政專員公署。
廉政公署口號
香港 勝在有你同ICAC(2006年至11年,2014年至今)
香港 一直勝在有你同ICAC(2012年及13年)
廉潔香港 有你同ICAC(2004年)
合力打擊 貪污絕跡(1998年至2001年)
香港 勝在有ICAC(1995年至1998年,2002年至04年)
守法規 重廉潔(2003年起出現於有關選舉的廣告中)
wai tse 【歷史時空】
independent commission against corruption 在 黎特 KNIGHT Youtube 的最佳貼文
全新製作的「廉署潮文動畫系列 – 大誠小事講呢啲」,今集話說劉明一直在好旺國做輔政大臣十幾年,一直好地地,直至幫王子舉辦徵婚舞會,就出事了......事不宜遲,即刻去片!
睇完足本動畫,輪到你講多啲!每集一個討論題等你「神回覆」、贏漫畫!
動畫及遊戲網址:http://www.iteencamp.icac.hk/AnimationView/Details/973
其他影片:
[廉署潮文動畫系列] 入學風雲
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HW0feZgT0kM
[廉署潮文動畫系列] 霸氣車王
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIzHoLwT7XY
independent commission against corruption 在 黎特 KNIGHT Youtube 的最讚貼文
全新製作的「廉署潮文動畫系列 – 大誠小事講呢啲」,已經嚟到第二集了!今集帶給你《霸氣車王》,古語有云「成功需苦幹,旅行坦蕩蕩」,咁點樣先至夠坦蕩同霸氣?即刻去片!
睇完足本動畫,輪到你講多啲!每集一個討論題等你「神回覆」、贏漫畫!
動畫及遊戲網址:http://www.iteencamp.icac.hk/AnimationView/Details/972
其他影片:
[廉署潮文動畫系列] 入學風雲
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HW0feZgT0kM
[廉署潮文動畫系列] 來自White Lie的你
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R60W8JRAlOA
independent commission against corruption 在 黎特 KNIGHT Youtube 的精選貼文
全新製作的「廉署潮文動畫系列 – 大誠小事講呢啲」,今日隆重首播!呢輯動畫、呢啲故事雖然講唔出咩大道理,但惡搞誠信處境肯定令你會心微笑!趁近排開學,率先獻映《入學風雲》應下節!去片!
動畫及遊戲網址:http://www.iteencamp.icac.hk/AnimationView/Details/971
其他影片:
[廉署潮文動畫系列] 霸氣車王
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIzHoLwT7XY
[廉署潮文動畫系列] 來自White Lie的你
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R60W8JRAlOA