My recent article😎😎😎
https://m.orangenews.hk/details?recommendId=138868
Opinion|The Police is duty-bound to enforce the law resolutely
HK Current
2020.10.06 11:05
By Athena Kung
According to the statement made by the US Department of State on 3rd of October 2020 (local time), the arrests made by the Hong Kong Police on 1st of October 2020 were criticized by the Department as malicious ones. It has been alleged by the US Department of State that the Hong Kong Police merely enforces the law for the aim of achieving political goals, which amounts to serious violation of Hong Kong's rule of law and thus strongly attack individual's human rights as well as Hong Kong people's freedom of expression, procession and assembly. The Central Government was commented by the US Department of State as being given up the undertaking of "One country, Two systems" completely. Obviously, such allegations against both the Central Government and HKSAR made by US Government were very serious. To examine whether such comments were fair ones, we have to carefully consider if the allegations really have any valid legal basis or foundation.
According to both the Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance, Cap. 383, Laws of Hong Kong (hereinafter referred to as "the BORO“) and and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (hereinafter referred to as the "ICCPR "), the freedoms of expression, procession and assembly were not absolute, and might be subject to restrictions as prescribed by law. Article 16 and 17 of the BORO relates to the freedom of opinion and expression and right of peaceful assembly which can be enjoyed by Hong Kong people:
"Article 16
Freedom of opinion and expression
(1) Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.
(2) Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.
(3) The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph (2) of this article carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary—
(a) for respect of the rights or reputations of others; or
(b) for the protection of national security or of public order (ordre public), or of public health or morals.
[cf. ICCPR Art. 19]
Article 17
Right of peaceful assembly
The right of peaceful assembly shall be recognized. No restrictions may be placed on the exercise of this right other than those imposed in conformity with the law and which are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, public order (ordre public), the protection of public health or morals or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.
[cf. ICCPR Art. 21]"
Thus, freedom of expression, procession and assembly in Hong Kong are not absolute. On the other hand, such rights are subject to restrictions as prescribed by law in the interests of public order, public safety and the interests of others, and so on.
Besides, Section 10(a) to (e) of the Police Force Ordinance, Cap 232, Laws of Hong Kong has clearly stated inter alia that:
"10. The duties of the police force shall be to take lawful measures for—
(a) preserving the public peace;
(b) preventing and detecting crimes and offences;
(c) preventing injury to life and property;
(d) apprehending all persons whom it is lawful to apprehend and for whose apprehension sufficient grounds exists;
(e) regulating processions and assemblies in public places or places of public resort;
…………"
What has really occurred in Hong Kong in various districts on 1st of October 2020?
(1) At around 1400 hours, a group of people gathered and yelled along Great George Street in Causeway Bay, which might have constituted offences related to unauthorised assemblies under the Public Order Ordinance, Cap 245, Laws of Hong Kong and offences related to prohibited group gatherings under the Prevention and Control of Disease (Prohibition on Group Gathering) Regulation, Cap 599G, Laws of Hong Kong. Even though the Police had given multiple warnings at the scene and raised the blue flag requesting participants to leave the scene, at around 1500 hours, a large group of protesters still remained at the same place. Some of them even commenced to chant the slogan “Liberate Hong Kong, Revolution of Our Times” over and over again. Thus, they were suspected of inciting or abetting others to commit acts of secession, which might constitute relevant offences under the HKSAR National Security Law. Afterwards, some protesters even spilled onto the road and breached public peace.
(2) At around 1500 hours, 2 men in the vicinity of Tin Ma Court in Wong Tai Sin hurled some petrol bombs and large objects at Lung Cheung Road. Having attended the scene, the police noticed that traces of the road being charred, as well as fences and traffic cones left on it. After investigation, the Police found that even though a large amount of vehicles were travelling along the road at the time of the incident, fortunately, no vehicle was hit by the petrol bombs and objects successfully. In any event, the rioters’ such heinous acts had severely endangered road users and breached public peace.
(3) The Police intercepted a man at Stewart Road in Wanchai at about 1600 hours and found him in possession of a foldable sharp knife which was at the same size of a business card. The 23-year-old man was subsequently arrested on suspicion of possession of an offensive weapon, as there stood a strong likelihood that he might intend to use the said item to injure members of the public or police officers.
(4) At around 1500 hours, the Police set up a roadblock along a section of the Tuen Mun Road near Summit Terrace in Tsuen Wan to intercept suspicious vehicles, and found extendable sticks, a helmet, face masks and a large amount of promotional leaflets inside a private car with an expired vehicle licence. Some of the leaflets contained slogans suspected of calling for “Hong Kong independence” written on them. The 35-year-old male driver of the car was arrested on suspicion of various offences including “Possession of Instrument Fit for Unlawful Purpose”, “Driving an Unlicenced Vehicle” and “Driving Without Third Party Insurance”.
(5) At around 1630 hours, the Police stopped and searched a man in the vicinity of Tonnochy Road and Lockhart Road in Causeway Bay, and found items including a cutter, a spanner, plastic straps and a pair of gloves in his backpack. The 20-year-old man was subsequently arrested on suspicion of possession of offensive weapons.
(6) After nightfall, protesters continued to gather in different districts. To ensure public safety, the Police have enforced the law resolutely according to the situations arising in different districts. At 2200 hours, not less than 86 persons have been arrested in multiple districts. Among them, 74 persons including four District Councillors were arrested on suspicion of taking part in unauthorised assemblies in Causeway Bay, while the rest were arrested on suspicion of committing offences including possession of offensive weapon, failing to produce proof of identity, possession of forged identity card, disorderly conduct in a public place and driving an unlicenced vehicle. Besides, 20 persons were given fixed penalty notices for suspectedly breaching the Prevention and Control of Disease (Prohibition on Group Gathering) Regulation.
Actually, the Police is duty-bound to enforce the law resolutely. On the facts, all arrests taken place on 1st of October 2020 were absolutely lawful and necessary to maintain law and order in the society and protect the life and property of all Hong Kong residents. Undoubtedly, the US officials have all along been adopting "double standards" in expressing utterly irresponsible remarks on law enforcement actions in the HKSAR. Everyone is equal before the law. So long as there is evidence supporting that someone has violated the law, no matter what his or her status or background is, he or she must face the legal consequence. Being a law enforcement agency, the Police must take action whenever they come across any unlawful acts in strict accordance with the laws in force. All cases must be handled in a fair, just and impartial manner by the Police in accordance with the law, which is the only and real reason as to why the Police arrested the 86 odd people on 1st of October 2020. To conclude, all criticizms made by the US towards the Hong Kong Police, HKSAR Government and Central Government were all unfair without any legal or concrete support at all.
It appears that the US government has always been refusing to accept the truth that the HKSAR is an inalienable part of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "the PRC") and a local administrative region which enjoys a high degree of autonomy, as contrary to absolute autonomy, and comes directly under the Central People's Government. Hong Kong affairs are internal matters of the PRC. The system in Hong Kong is not "Two countries, Two systems". Hong Kong will never be an independent country with a pro-American government formed by the Opposition Camp in Hong Kong. Any foreign governments like the US must at once stop scaremongering and interfering in any form in Hong Kong's affairs. The "Colour Revolution" promoted by the US in Hong Kong should be terminated in no time.
The author is Barrister-at-law.
The views don't necessarily reflect those of Orange News.
責編: CK Li
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2萬的網紅Marc Yam,也在其Youtube影片中提到,Mathematics involved in Physics Slope Intercept Form of Straight Line Equations 中文版:https://youtu.be/B-xW0HdisuQ...
intercept form 在 方志恒 Brian Fong Facebook 的最佳解答
【#香港研究】
香港研究學院轄下嘅民調中心,將正式定名為「社會科學調查研究室」(Social Science Data Laboratory)。我哋同其他大學民調中心嘅最大唔同,係除左做電話民意調查外,亦會做大數據、社交媒體分析、網上調查、街頭訪問、內容分析、小組訪問等等 ── 即係話乜嘢研究都會做。
經過左一輪測試後,研究室已經全面投入運作,各方朋友不論左中右、政府政黨企業定係智庫NGO大專院校,如果有任何研究調查想做,都歡迎搵我哋傾下。只要簡單填張查詢表格( https://goo.gl/b8rCE7 ),我哋就會有專人同你聯絡跟進㗎喇。
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
社會科學調查研究室是香港研究學院轄下的自資研究團隊。本研究室由一批具經驗的研究人員運作,提供一系列高水平的社會科學研究服務及培訓。我們樂意為各行業客戶,包括大專院校、政府部門、公營機構、私營企業、非政府機構及中小學訂定合適的服務。
研究服務(包括研究設計、數據收集、數據分析及報告撰寫)
(1) 大數據及社交媒體分析
(2) 電話調查
(3) 郵遞調查
(4) 網上調查
(5) 街頭訪問
(6) 內容分析
(7) 小組訪問
研究培訓(包括培訓設計及培訓傳遞)
(1) 中學生電話調查工作坊
(2) 本科生及研究生統計及抽樣調查教學
(3) 自選應用研究訓練
查詢
李家文博士 (研究統籌主任)
電郵:kml@eduhk.hk
電話:(852) 2948 8564
*請先填妥查詢表格:https://goo.gl/b8rCE7
Social Science Data Laboratory
The Social Science Data Laboratory (SSDL) is a self-financed research unit of The Academy of Hong Kong Studies (AHKS). Operated by a team of experienced researchers, the SSDL provides a wide range of state-of-the-art research services and trainings on social science data collection. We are ready to offer customized services to clients from different sectors of the community such as academic institutions, government departments, public organizations, private enterprises, non-government organizations and secondary / primary schools.
Research services (from research design, data collection to data analysis and report writing)
(1) Big data and social media analysis
(2) Telephone survey
(3) Postal survey
(4) Online survey
(5) Street intercept survey
(6) Content analysis
(7) Focus groups
Training services (from training design to training delivery)
(1) Polling workshops for secondary students.
(2) Classes for undergraduate and postgraduate students on statistical and survey research skills.
(3) Customized research trainings based on clients’ needs.
Enquiry and consultation:
Dr. LEE, Ka-man, Dominic (Research Coordinator)
E-mail: kml@eduhk.hk
Tel: (852) 2948 8564
*Please complete this enquiry form: https://goo.gl/b8rCE7
intercept form 在 Marc Yam Youtube 的最讚貼文
Mathematics involved in Physics
Slope Intercept Form of Straight Line Equations
中文版:https://youtu.be/B-xW0HdisuQ