毋忘五大訴求 公民抗命有理
—10‧20九龍遊行陳情書
(案件編號:DCCC 535/2020)
——————————————————
「毋忘初衷,活在愛和真實之中」
撐阿銘,即訂閱Patreon:
patreon.com/raphaelwong
—————————————————
胡法官雅文閣下:
2012年,我第一次站在法庭上承認違反「公安惡法」,述說對普選的盼望,批評公安惡法不義,並因公民抗命的緣故,甘心樂意接受刑罰。當年我說,如果小圈子選舉沒有被廢除,惡法沒有消失,我依然會一如故我,公民抗命,並且我相信將會有更多學生和市民加入這個行列。想不到時至今日,普選仍然遙遙無期,我亦再次被帶到法庭接受審判,但只是短短7年,已經有數十萬計的群眾公民抗命,反對暴政。今日,我承認違反「未經批准的政府」所訂立「未經批准的惡法」之下的「未經批准集結」罪,我不打算尋求法庭的憐憫,但請容許我佔用法庭些微時間陳情,讓法庭在判刑前有全面考慮。
暴力之濫觴
在整個反修例運動如火如荼之際,我正承擔另一宗公民抗命案件的刑責。雖然身在獄中,但仍然心繫手足。我在獄中電視機前見證6月9日、6月16日及8月18日三次百萬港人大遊行,幾多熱愛和平的港人冒天雨冒彈雨走上街頭,抗議不義惡法,今日關於10月20日的案件,亦是如此。可能有人會問,政府已在6月暫緩修例,更在9月正式撤回修例,我等仍然繼續示威,豈非無理取鬧?我相信法官閣下肯定聽過「遲來的正義並非正義」(Justice delayed is justice denied)這句格言。當過百萬群眾走上街頭,和平表達不滿的時候,林鄭政府沒有理睬,反而獨行獨斷,粗暴踐踏港人的意願,結果製造出後來連綿不絕的爭拗,甚至你死我活的對抗。經歷眾多衝突痛苦之後,所謂暫緩撤回,已經微不足道,我們只是更加清楚:沒有民主,就連基本人權都不會擁有!
在本案之中,雖然我們都沒有鼓動或作出暴力行為,但根據早前8‧18及10‧1兩宗案件,相信在控方及法庭眼中,案發當日的暴力事件仍然可以算在我們頭上,如此,我有必要問:如果香港有一個公平正義的普及選舉,人民可以在立法會直接否決他們不認可的法律,試問2019年的暴力衝突可以從何而來呢?如果我們眼見的暴力是如此十惡不赦,那麼我們又如何看待百萬人遊行後仍然堅持推行惡法的制度暴力呢?如果我們不能接受人民暴力反抗,那麼我們是否更加不能對更巨大更壓逼的制度暴力沈默不言?真正且經常發生的暴力,是漠視人民訴求的暴力,是踐踏人民意見的暴力,是剝奪人民表達權利的暴力。真正憎恨暴力,痛恨暴力的人,不可能一方面指摘暴力反抗,又容忍制度暴力。如果我需要承擔和平遊行引發出來的暴力事件的刑責,那麼誰應該承擔施政失敗所引發出來的社會騷亂的罪責呢?
社會之病根
對於法庭而言,可能2019年所發生的事情只是一場社會騷亂,務必追究違法者個人責任。然而,治亂治其本源,醫病醫其病根,我雖然公民抗命,刻意違法,控方把我帶上法庭,但我卻不應被理解為一個「犯罪個體」。2019年所發生的事情,並不是我一個人或我們這幾位被告可以促成,社會問題的癥結不是「犯罪份子」本身,而是「犯罪原因」。我明白「治亂世用重典」的道理,但如果「殺雞儆猴」是解決方法,就不會在2016年發生旺角騷亂及2017年上訴庭對示威者施以重刑後,2019年仍然會爆發出更大規模的暴力反抗。
如果不希望社會動亂,就必須正本清源,逐步落實「五大訴求」,從根本上改革,挽回民心。2019年反修例運動,其實只是2014年雨傘運動的延續而已,縱使法庭可能認為兩個運動皆是「一股歪風」所引起,但我必須澄清,兩個運動的核心就是追求民主普選,人民當家作主。在2019年11月24日區議會選舉這個最類近全民普選的選舉中,接近300萬人投票,民主派大勝,奪得17個區議會主導權,這就是整個反修例運動的民意,民意就是反對政府決策,反對制度暴力,反對推行惡法,不容爭辯,不辯自明。我們作為礦場裡的金絲雀,多次提醒政府撤回修法,並從根本上改革制度,而在10月20日的九龍遊行當然是反映民意的平台契機。如今,法庭對我們施加重刑,其實只不過是懲罰民意,將金絲雀困在鳥籠之內,甚至扼殺於鼓掌之中,窒礙表達自由。
堅持之重要
大運動過後的大鎮壓,使我們失去《蘋果日報》,失去教協,失去民陣,不少民主派領袖以及曾為運動付出的手足戰友都囚於獄中,不少曾經熱情投入運動的朋友亦因《國安法》的威脅轉為低調,新聞自由示威自由日漸萎縮,公民社會受到沈重打擊,我亦失去不少摯友,有感傷孤獨的時候,但我仍然相信,2019年香港人的信念,以及所展現人類的光輝持久未變。我不會忘記百萬人民冒雨捱熱抗拒暴政,抵制惡法,展現我們眾志成城;我不會忘記人潮紅海,讓道救護車,展現我們文明精神;我不會忘記年青志士直接行動反對苛政,捨身成仁,展現我們膽色勇氣;我不會忘記銀髮一族走上街頭保護年青人,展現我們彼此關懷;我不會忘記「五大訴求」,不會忘記2019年區議會選舉,展現我們有理有節。
法官閣下,我對於當日的所作所為,不感羞恥,毫無悔意。我能夠在出獄後與群眾同行一路,與戰友同繫一獄,實是莫大榮幸。若法治失去民主基石,將使法庭無奈地接受專制政權所訂立解釋的法律限制,隨時變成政治工具掃除異見,因此爭取民主普選,建設真正法治,追求公平正義,仍然是我的理想。在這條路上,如有必要,我仍然會公民抗命,正如終審法院海外非常任法官賀輔明(Lord Hoffmann)所言,發自良知的公民抗命有悠久及光榮的傳統,歷史將證明我們是正確的。我期望,曾與我一起遊行抗命的手足戰友要堅持信念,在艱難歲月裡毋忘初衷,活在愛和真實之中。
最後,如9年前一樣,我想借用美國民權領袖馬丁路德金牧師的一番話對我們的反對者說:「我們將以自己忍受苦難的能力,來較量你們製造苦難的能力。我們將用我們靈魂的力量,來抵禦你們物質的暴力。對我們做你們想做的事吧,我們仍然愛你們。我們不能憑良心服從你們不公正的法律,因為拒惡與為善一樣是道德責任。將我們送入監獄吧,我們仍然愛你們。」(We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you.)
願慈愛的主耶穌賜我們平安,與我和我一家同在,與法官閣下同在,與香港人同在。沒有暴徒,只有暴政;五大訴求,缺一不可!願榮耀歸上帝,榮光歸人民!
第五被告
黃浩銘
二零二一年八月十九日
Lest we forget the five demands: civil disobedience is morally justified
- Statement on 10‧20 Kowloon Rally
(Case No.: DCCC 535/2020)
Your Honour Judge Woodcock
In 2012, I stood before the court and admitted to violating the "Public Security Evil Law". I expressed my hope for universal suffrage, criticized the evil law as unjust, and willingly accepted the penalty for civil disobedience. Back then, I said that if the small-circle election had not been abolished and the draconian law had not disappeared, I would still be as determined as I was, and I believe that more students and citizens would join this movement. Today, universal suffrage is still a long way off, and I have been brought before the court again for trial. But in just seven years, hundreds of thousands of people have already risen up in civil disobedience against tyranny. Today, I plead guilty to "unauthorised assembly" under an unapproved evil law enacted by an unauthorised government. I do not intend to seek the court's mercy, but please allow me to take up a little time in court to present my case so that the court can consider all aspects before sentencing me.
The roots of violence
At the time when the whole anti-extradition law movement was in full-swing, I was taking responsibility for another civil disobedience case. Although I was in prison, my heart was still with the people. I witnessed the three million-person rallies on 9 June, 16 June and 18 August on television in prison, when many peace-loving people took to the streets despite the rain and bullets, to protest against unjust laws. Some people may ask, "The Government has already suspended the legislative amendments in June and formally withdrew the bill in September, but we are still demonstrating, are we not being unreasonable?" I am sure your Honour has heard of the adage "Justice delayed is justice denied". When more than a million people took to the streets to express their discontent peacefully, the Lam administration ignored them and instead acted arbitrarily, brutally trampling on the wishes of the people of Hong Kong, resulting in endless arguments and even confrontations. After so many conflicts and painful experiences, the so-called moratorium is no longer meaningful. We only know better: without democracy, we cannot even have basic human rights!
In this case, although we did not instigate or commit acts of violence, I believe that in the eyes of the prosecution and the court, the violence on the day of the incident can still be counted against us, based on the August 18 and October 1 case. And now I must ask - If Hong Kong had a fair and just universal election, and the public could directly veto laws they did not approve of at the Legislative Council, then how could the violent clashes of 2019 have come about? If the violence we see is so heinous, how do we feel about the institutional violence that insists on the imposition of draconian laws even after millions of people have taken to the streets? If we cannot accept violent rebellion, how can we remain silent in the face of even greater and more oppressive institutional violence? The true and frequent violence is the kind of violence that ignores people's demands, that tramples on their opinions, that deprives them of their right to express themselves. People who truly hate violence and abhor it cannot accuse violent resistance on the one hand and tolerate institutional violence on the other. If I have to bear the criminal responsibility for the violence caused by the peaceful demonstration, then who should bear the criminal responsibility for the social unrest caused by failed administration?
The roots of society's problems
From a court's point of view, it may be that what happened in 2019 was just a series of social unrest, and that those who broke the law must be held personally accountable. What happened in 2019 was not something that I alone or the defendants could have made possible, and the crux of the social problem was not the 'criminals' but the 'causes of crime'. I understand the concept of " applying severe punishment to a troubled world", but if "decimation" was really the solution, there would not have been more violent rebellions in 2019 after the Mongkok "riot" in 2016 and the heavy sentences handed down to protesters by the Court of Appeal in 2017.
If we do not want social unrest, we must get to the root of the problem and implement the "five demands" step by step, so as to achieve fundamental reforms and win back the hearts of the people. 2019's anti-revision movement is indeed a continuation of 2014's Umbrella Movement, and even though the court may think that both movements are caused by a "perverse wind", I must clarify that the core of both movements is the pursuit of democracy and universal suffrage, and the people being the masters of their own house. In the District Council election on 24 November 2019, which is the closest thing to universal suffrage, nearly 3 million people voted, and the democratic camp won a huge victory, winning majority in 17 District Councils. As canaries in the monetary coal mine, we have repeatedly reminded the government to withdraw the extradition bill and fundamentally reform the system, and the march in Kowloon on 20 October was certainly an opportunity to reflect public opinion. Now, by imposing heavy penalties on us, the court is only punishing public opinion, trapping the canaries in a birdcage, or even stifling them in the palm of their hands, suffocating the freedom of expression.
The importance of persistence
As a result of the crackdown after the mass movement, we lost Apple Daily, the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, and the Civil Human Rights Front. Many of our democratic leaders and comrades who had contributed to the movement were imprisoned, and many of our friends who had been passionately involved in the movement had been forced to lay low under the threat of the National Security Law. I still believe that the faith of Hong Kong people and the glory of humanity seen in 2019 will remain unchanged. I will never forget the millions of people who braved the rain and the heat to resist tyranny and evil laws, demonstrating our unity of purpose; I will never forget the crowds of people who gave way to ambulances, demonstrating our civility; I will never forget the young people who sacrificed their lives, demonstrating our courage and bravery; I will never forget the silver-haired who took to the streets to protect the youth, demonstrating our care for each other; I will never forget the "five demands" and the 2019 District Council election, demonstrating our rationality and decency.
Your Honour, I have nothing to be ashamed of and no remorse for what I did on that day. It is my great honour to be in prison with my comrades and to be able to walk with the public after my release. If the rule of law were to lose its democratic foundation, the courts would have no choice but to accept the legal restrictions set by the autocratic regime and become a political tool to eliminate dissent at any time. As Lord Hoffmann, a non-permanent overseas judge of the Court of Final Appeal, said, civil disobedience from the conscience has a long and honourable tradition, and history will prove us right. I hope that my comrades in arms who walked with me in protests will keep their faith and live in love and truth in the midst of this difficult time.
Finally, as I did nine years ago, I would like to say something to those who oppose us, borrowing the words of American civil rights leader Reverend Martin Luther King: "We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you."
Peace be with me and my family, with Your Honour, and with the people of Hong Kong. There are no thugs, only tyranny; five demands, not one less! To god be the glory and to people be the glory!
The Fifth Defendant
Wong Ho Ming
19 August 2021
同時也有149部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過8,320的網紅Campus TV, HKUSU 香港大學學生會校園電視,也在其Youtube影片中提到,二零二零年香港立法會選舉原定下個月舉行。作為二零一九年反修例運動之後嘅第一次立法會選舉,呢次選舉對香港政局攸關重要。可惜,選舉主任取消唔少參選人嘅參選資格,更將選舉押後舉行。我哋校園電視同香港大學學生會評議會時事委員會合力製作「本土政治知多啲」短片,希望能夠俾同學分享自己睇法,並且普及政治知識! ...
「legislative council of hong kong」的推薦目錄:
- 關於legislative council of hong kong 在 黃浩銘 Raphael Wong Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於legislative council of hong kong 在 Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於legislative council of hong kong 在 吳文遠 Avery Ng Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於legislative council of hong kong 在 Campus TV, HKUSU 香港大學學生會校園電視 Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於legislative council of hong kong 在 黃紫盈 Connie Wong コニー Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於legislative council of hong kong 在 黃紫盈 Connie Wong コニー Youtube 的最佳解答
legislative council of hong kong 在 Facebook 的最佳貼文
【EyE on U | Regina Ip
1st year implementation of National Security Law】
專訪葉太:國安法實施一週年
The national security law has been implemented in Hong Kong for a year, which plugs national security loopholes in the city and paves the way for HK's long-term stability and prosperity.
DotDotNews gladly presents a new program named "EyE on U," co-hosted by Eunice Yung, Legislative Council member and Edward Leung, member of Chinese Association of HK & Macao Studies. In each episode, politicians, business leaders and professionals from different sectors will be invited to share with us their insights on popular topics.
In the first episode, we have Regina Ip, member of the Executive Council and the Legislative Council, with us to talk about the impacts of the national security law in HK over the past year.
How would Ip comment on the effectiveness of the law? Does the law impact freedom of speech in HK? What can we expect for the city's future with the law in place? Watch the video for more of Ip's insights, and always stay tuned for more to come!
legislative council of hong kong 在 吳文遠 Avery Ng Facebook 的最佳貼文
【6.12:追求民主、自由、公義和法治的聲音,依然是佔香港的大多數】
https://youtu.be/qhrwmxeshVw
———————————
文遠交低話大家記住一定要撐 #文遠Patreon 呀!
⭐️支持文遠⭐️請訂閱Patreon⭐️
⭐️Please show your support by subscribing to Avery’s Patreon ⭐️
www.patreon.com/AveryNg
———————————
兩年前的2019年6月12日,我們香港人團結一致地,至少暫時阻擋了送中條例的立法。雖然當年我們成功阻截了送中條例,但是當時政權察覺到,就算由它們佔據了立法會的大多數,我們民主派還是有能力去抵抗,所以現在它們推出了新的選舉制度。在新制度下,立法會的代表性和人大政協已沒有多大差別,更加無需再討論是否參選或如何投票。
但我還是要提醒各位,縱使今天的狀況有多艱難,縱使政權如何出盡茅招也好,記住、記住、記住,我們在香港追求民主、自由、公義和法治的聲音,依然是佔香港的大多數。正正是因為我們佔據了大多數,這個政府才會出盡茅招去扭曲現時的議會,去扭曲全個制度,它們甚至乎扭曲了整個遊戲規則還不夠,還要將任何反對抱異見的人掃入監倉。
您鎖得住我的肉體,卻鎖不了我的靈魂,更加鎖不了我把口!希望各位在牆外的朋友,尤其是今天這麼熱的日子,見字飲水,KEEP 住我們的動力,我們終有一天是會勝利、是會成功的!
——————————-
[6.12: Voices in pursuit of democracy, freedom, justice and the rule of law are still the majority in Hong Kong]
Two years ago, on 12 June 2019, we in Hong Kong united to stop, at least temporarily, the Extradition Bill. It is very important to note that on that day, we showed our courage and solidarity in Admiralty. Although we have succeeded in stopping the Extradition Bill back then, look at Hong Kong today - we are still under the shameless Carrie Lam regime. At that time, the regime realised that even if they had the majority in the Legislative Council, we democrats were still capable of resisting, so now they have introduced a new electoral system. Under the new system, the representativeness of the Legislative Council is not much different from that of the National People's Congress and the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, and there is no need to discuss whether to run for election or how to vote.
I must remind you that no matter how difficult the situation is today, no matter how hard the regime tries to suppress us, REMEMBER - the majority in Hong Kong are in the pursuit of democracy, freedom, justice and the rule of law. This is precisely why this government has gone to great lengths to distort the current legislature, to distort the whole system, and they have even gone so far as to throw anyone in opposition into jail.
You can lock up my body, but not my soul, and not my mouth!
I don't know when I'll be back, but I hope that all of you outside the walls, especially on such a hot day, to take care of yourselves, and keep up our momentum, so that one day we will win and succeed. In the mean time, take care!
#612
#612基金
#反送中
———————————
文遠交低話大家記住一定要撐 #文遠Patreon 呀!
⭐️支持文遠⭐️請訂閱Patreon⭐️
⭐️Please show your support by subscribing to Avery’s Patreon ⭐️
www.patreon.com/AveryNg
legislative council of hong kong 在 Campus TV, HKUSU 香港大學學生會校園電視 Youtube 的最佳解答
二零二零年香港立法會選舉原定下個月舉行。作為二零一九年反修例運動之後嘅第一次立法會選舉,呢次選舉對香港政局攸關重要。可惜,選舉主任取消唔少參選人嘅參選資格,更將選舉押後舉行。我哋校園電視同香港大學學生會評議會時事委員會合力製作「本土政治知多啲」短片,希望能夠俾同學分享自己睇法,並且普及政治知識!
The Legislative Council Election 2020 is supposed to be held next month. As the very first Legislative Council Election after the 2019 Anti-extradition Bill Movement, this election is vitally important to Hong Kong politics. Unfortunately, Electoral Officers disqualified a number of applicants and even postponed the election. We have collaborated with Current Affairs Committee to produce a video which allows students to express their views and to acquire political knowledge.
Follow Us for Lastest Update
--------------------------------
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hkucampustv
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/campustv_hkusu
Twitter: https://twitter.com/campustv_hkusu
Our Website
--------------------------------
https://campustv.hkusu.hku.hk
legislative council of hong kong 在 黃紫盈 Connie Wong コニー Youtube 的最佳貼文
為Fortinet擔任論壇司儀~ 活動圓滿大成功!
粵英普日 全方位主持|優雅時尚・活力百變 | Connie 黃紫盈
Follow Connie
Website: www.conniewong.hk
Facebook: www.facebook.com/conniewty
黃紫盈 (Connie) 現為司儀、主持、影片監製及跨媒體自由工作者,活躍於商界及政府機構主辦的活動,為各類型公開活動擔任司儀(包括晚宴、產品發布會、頒獎禮、記者會和音樂會等),同時監製和主持旅遊、飲食及時尚生活資訊節目,包括《盈遊世界》、《尚駿生活》和《友飲友食》等。Connie 精通三文四語,包話粵語、英語、普通話和日語。在任職無綫電視新聞主播及記者期間,她曾主持 《香港早晨》、《立法會選舉特備節目》以及《311日本東北大地震一周年現場直播》等重要新聞環節。
Connie 畢業於香港中文大學新聞與傳播學院,曾留學英國劍橋大學修讀國際關係以及日本創價大學修讀日本文化研究。她熱衷於義務工作和戶外活動,曾獲得由行政長官頒發的「香港青年奬勵計劃 (前香港愛丁堡公爵獎勵計劃) 最高金章榮譽」。
興趣: 旅遊、行山、美容、烹飪、攝影
Connie Wong is a professional emcee, programme host and producer actively involved in multi-media work. She is experienced in hosting various events (such as gala dinner, product launch, press briefing, award ceremony, music concert etc.), as well as infotainment programmes covering travel, food and lifestyle, e.g. "Travel Smart" and "Chic Life". Connie is fluent in Cantonese, English, Mandarin and Japanese. Previously, Connie was news anchor at TVB where she hosted several key featured news programmes including Good Morning Hong Kong, Legislative Council Election, and 311 Tohoku Earthquake and Tsunami One Year Anniversary.
Connie holds a bachelor degree in Journalism and Communication from The Chinese University of Hong Kong. She also studied International Relations at Cambridge University in U.K., and Japanese Studies at Soka University in Japan. She is active in voluntary services and outdoor activities. She has been awarded the Gold Award of the Hong Kong Award for Young People (formerly known as The Duke of Edinburgh's Award).
Hobby: Travel, Hiking, Beauty, Cooking, Photography
黄紫盈(コニー・ウォン)はイベントMC、テレビ番組司会者、ラジオパーソナリティ、プロデューサーとして活躍。祝宴や製品発表会、授賞式、記者会見やコンサートの司会に加え、旅行や食、ライフスタイルの情報番組のレポーターも務めている。英語、中国語、広東語、日本語が堪能で、香港のテレビ局TVBのアナウンサー時代は「香港グッドモーニング」、「香港立法会選挙特別番組」、「3.11東日本大震災1周年放送」等、重要なニュースの報道を担当していた。
彼女は香港中文大学のジャーナリズムコミュニケーション学部を卒業。香港出身であり、在学中には英国・日本への留学も経験している。ケンブリッジ大学では国際関係を、日本創価大学では日本文化研究を専攻している。また、慈善活動への積極的な参加が評価され、香港行政長官より青年奨励計画最高賞であるゴールド章受賞の栄誉を受けている。
趣味:旅行、ハイキング、ビューティー、料理、写真
Tags: 中英日四語司儀, 大型活動司儀, 商場活動司儀, 發布會司儀, 晚宴典禮司儀, 婚禮司儀, 粵語司儀, 國語司儀, 英語司儀, 日語司儀, 普通話司儀, 日文司儀, 英文司儀, 中文司儀, 專業司儀, 星級司儀, 節目主持, 無綫電視, 新聞主播, 新城電台, 黃紫盈, Connie Wong, Emcee, MC, Host, TVB, News Anchor, DJ, Cantonese MC, English MC, Japanese MC, Mandarin MC, Putonghua MC, Annual Dinner, Gala Dinner, Award Ceremony, Product Launch, Grand Opening
#MC紫盈 #司儀 #主持 #主播 #中文司儀 #日文司儀 #英文司儀 #英語司儀 #日語司儀 #廣東話司儀 #粵語司儀 #普通話司儀 #國語司儀 #黃紫盈 #ConnieWong #HKMC #Emcee #MC #English #Japanese #Mandarin #Putonghua #Cantonese
legislative council of hong kong 在 黃紫盈 Connie Wong コニー Youtube 的最佳解答
為教育局擔任論壇司儀~ 活動圓滿大成功!
粵英普日 全方位主持|優雅時尚・活力百變 | Connie 黃紫盈
Follow Connie
Website: www.conniewong.hk
Facebook: www.facebook.com/conniewty
黃紫盈 (Connie) 現為司儀、主持、影片監製及跨媒體自由工作者,活躍於商界及政府機構主辦的活動,為各類型公開活動擔任司儀(包括晚宴、產品發布會、頒獎禮、記者會和音樂會等),同時監製和主持旅遊、飲食及時尚生活資訊節目,包括《盈遊世界》、《尚駿生活》和《友飲友食》等。Connie 精通三文四語,包話粵語、英語、普通話和日語。在任職無綫電視新聞主播及記者期間,她曾主持 《香港早晨》、《立法會選舉特備節目》以及《311日本東北大地震一周年現場直播》等重要新聞環節。
Connie 畢業於香港中文大學新聞與傳播學院,曾留學英國劍橋大學修讀國際關係以及日本創價大學修讀日本文化研究。她熱衷於義務工作和戶外活動,曾獲得由行政長官頒發的「香港青年奬勵計劃 (前香港愛丁堡公爵獎勵計劃) 最高金章榮譽」。
興趣: 旅遊、行山、美容、烹飪、攝影
Connie Wong is a professional emcee, programme host and producer actively involved in multi-media work. She is experienced in hosting various events (such as gala dinner, product launch, press briefing, award ceremony, music concert etc.), as well as infotainment programmes covering travel, food and lifestyle, e.g. "Travel Smart" and "Chic Life". Connie is fluent in Cantonese, English, Mandarin and Japanese. Previously, Connie was news anchor at TVB where she hosted several key featured news programmes including Good Morning Hong Kong, Legislative Council Election, and 311 Tohoku Earthquake and Tsunami One Year Anniversary.
Connie holds a bachelor degree in Journalism and Communication from The Chinese University of Hong Kong. She also studied International Relations at Cambridge University in U.K., and Japanese Studies at Soka University in Japan. She is active in voluntary services and outdoor activities. She has been awarded the Gold Award of the Hong Kong Award for Young People (formerly known as The Duke of Edinburgh's Award).
Hobby: Travel, Hiking, Beauty, Cooking, Photography
黄紫盈(コニー・ウォン)はイベントMC、テレビ番組司会者、ラジオパーソナリティ、プロデューサーとして活躍。祝宴や製品発表会、授賞式、記者会見やコンサートの司会に加え、旅行や食、ライフスタイルの情報番組のレポーターも務めている。英語、中国語、広東語、日本語が堪能で、香港のテレビ局TVBのアナウンサー時代は「香港グッドモーニング」、「香港立法会選挙特別番組」、「3.11東日本大震災1周年放送」等、重要なニュースの報道を担当していた。
彼女は香港中文大学のジャーナリズムコミュニケーション学部を卒業。香港出身であり、在学中には英国・日本への留学も経験している。ケンブリッジ大学では国際関係を、日本創価大学では日本文化研究を専攻している。また、慈善活動への積極的な参加が評価され、香港行政長官より青年奨励計画最高賞であるゴールド章受賞の栄誉を受けている。
趣味:旅行、ハイキング、ビューティー、料理、写真
Tags: 中英日四語司儀, 大型活動司儀, 商場活動司儀, 發布會司儀, 晚宴典禮司儀, 婚禮司儀, 粵語司儀, 國語司儀, 英語司儀, 日語司儀, 普通話司儀, 日文司儀, 英文司儀, 中文司儀, 專業司儀, 星級司儀, 節目主持, 無綫電視, 新聞主播, 新城電台, 黃紫盈, Connie Wong, Emcee, MC, Host, TVB, News Anchor, DJ, Cantonese MC, English MC, Japanese MC, Mandarin MC, Putonghua MC, Annual Dinner, Gala Dinner, Award Ceremony, Product Launch, Grand Opening
#MC紫盈 #司儀 #主持 #主播 #中文司儀 #日文司儀 #英文司儀 #英語司儀 #日語司儀 #廣東話司儀 #粵語司儀 #普通話司儀 #國語司儀 #黃紫盈 #ConnieWong #HKMC #Emcee #MC #English #Japanese #Mandarin #Putonghua #Cantonese