英模孩子,
這週你們在題本中學了Mandela Effect,
俐媽還額外多教了十幾種effect呢!
而Mandela Effeft真的和南非前總統Mandela有關嗎?
是的!
但網頁提供的圖片不是Mandela,
卻是「阿甘正傳」裡的Forrest Gump,
那位說出經典名言「人生就像是一盒巧克力🍫」的阿甘?
Why???
俐媽說:
所以要點進去讀內文,才知道怎麼回事啦!
至於它的定義,
題本文章中都有解釋,
俐媽今天為大家補充一篇文章喔!
——————————————————————
👨🏾 俐媽英文教室—Mandela Effect篇:
👥 experiment (n.) 實驗
👥 genuine (a.) 真實的
👥 phenomenon (n.) 現象
👥 even though (conj.) 即使
👥 date back to… 追溯至⋯
👥 prison (n.) 監獄
👥 declaration (n.) 宣稱
👥 distortion (n.) 扭曲
👥 misinformation (n.) 錯誤資訊
👥 interfere with (phrase) 干擾
👥 recall (v.) 回想
👥 prominent (a.) 傑出聞名的
👥 apartheid (n.) 南非種族隔離政策
👥 parallel (a.) 平行的
👥 alternative (a.) 二擇一的;非主流的
👥 adamant (a.) 堅決的;固執的
👥 embellishment (n.) 裝飾
👥 assassination (n.) 暗殺
👥 attribute to N 歸因於⋯
👥 ignorance (n.) 忽略;無知
👥 auxiliary (a.) 輔助的
👥 obscure (v.) 使模糊;使不顯著
👥 Chances are that S + V 有可能⋯
👥 glitch (v.) 造成差錯
👥 contradiction (n.) 矛盾
👥 version (n.) 版本
👥 ultimately (adv.) 最後
👥 intrigue (n.) 陰謀;詭計
👥 accuracy (n.) 精準
👥 authenticity (n.) 道地;真實性
👥 misinformation (n.) 錯誤訊息
———————————————————————-
Source:
https://theconversation.com/the-mandela-effect-and-the-science-of-false-memories-114226
#俐媽英文教室
#俐媽英文教室效應篇
#俐媽英文教室MandelaEffect篇
#很多資訊不能以訛傳訛
#要確實求證哦
#台大明明要復課了
#我們很認真確實做防疫哦
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過0的網紅Vania Mak,也在其Youtube影片中提到,YouTube was first launched in 2005, and now has become one of the most visited websites in the history of the internet. Before 2012, YouTube paid con...
「misinformation effect」的推薦目錄:
- 關於misinformation effect 在 辣媽英文天后 林俐 Carol Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於misinformation effect 在 多益達人 林立英文 Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於misinformation effect 在 Lee Hsien Loong Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於misinformation effect 在 Vania Mak Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於misinformation effect 在 The Misinformation Effect - YouTube 的評價
- 關於misinformation effect 在 Elizabeth Loftus and The Misinformation Effect - YouTube 的評價
- 關於misinformation effect 在 The science behind why fake news is so hard to wipe out - Vox 的評價
misinformation effect 在 多益達人 林立英文 Facebook 的精選貼文
Facebook announces steps to clamp down on misinformation ahead of 2020 election
防假新聞操縱二○二○年大選 FB宣布反制措施
Facebook has announced steps to combat misinformation and voter suppression ( ) ahead of ( ) the November 2020 US presidential election, on the same day it disclosed ( ) the removal of a network of Russian accounts targeting US voters on Instagram.
美國二○二○年總統大選將自十一月起跑,Facebook趕在選前宣布相關措施,以打擊假消息和選民壓制,並在同日宣布刪除在Instagram上針對美國選民的俄羅斯帳號。
Facebook said on Oct. 21 it would increase transparency ( ) through measures such as showing more information about the confirmed owner of a Facebook page and more prominently ( ) labeling content that independent fact-checkers have marked as false.
Facebook於十月二十一日表示,將採取措施提高其網站的透明度,例如顯示Facebook專頁之已驗證擁有者的更多資訊,對於被獨立事實查核人員判定為假新聞的訊息,則會用更顯著的方式標記出來。
The social media giant has come under fire ( ) in recent weeks over its policy of exempting ( ) ads run by politicians from fact-checking, drawing ire ( ) from Democratic presidential candidates Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren.
Facebook這社群媒體巨頭近幾週來飽受抨擊,因為政治人物在該網站投放的廣告可以免受事實查核,這也激怒了民主黨總統候選人Joe Biden和Elizabeth Warren。
Two weeks ago, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg defended the policy, saying social media had introduced transformative avenues ( ) for speech that should not be shut down.
二週前,Facebook執行長Mark Zuckerberg為此規定辯解,稱社群媒體提供了變通的言論場域,不應關閉。
That same day, the Biden campaign called for the removal of an ad run by a super PAC campaign group that it said contained ( ) false claims about the former vice president.
Biden競選團隊於同日呼籲刪除由超級政治行動委員會競選團體所投放的廣告,指該廣告有對Biden這前副總統的不實說法。
Katie Harbath, Facebook’s head of global elections policy, said in response ( ) that if the now inactive ad ran again, it would be sent to Facebook’s third-party fact-checkers.
Facebook全球選舉相關政策主管凱蒂‧哈巴斯回應說,如果已靜止的廣告現又再次啟動,就會被發送給Facebook的第三方事實查核人員。
On Oct. 21, Facebook said would be putting into effect ( ) its planned ban on paid ads that tell people in the US not to vote. Zuckerberg told reporters on a conference call that the ban on voter misinformation would also apply to ads run by politicians.
Facebook在十月二十一日表示,將禁止要美國民眾別投票的付費廣告。Zuckerberg在視訊會議中向記者表示,對選民假消息的禁令也將適用於政治人物投放的廣告。
The company will start labeling ( ) state-controlled media on its page and in the site’s ad library. In a blog post, Facebook said it planned to expand this labeling to specific posts on both Facebook and Instagram early next year.
該公司將開始在Facebook頁面和網站廣告庫中,標記出由國家控制的媒體。Facebook在部落格中表示,計劃在明年初將此標記方式擴及Facebook和Instagram上的特定貼文。
Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, the video-streaming ( ) service of Alphabet’s Google, all recently came under scrutiny ( ) after showing ads from Chinese state-controlled media that criticized Hong Kong protesters.
Facebook、Twitter和YouTube,以及Alphabet公司旗下的Google影音串流服務,最近都因發布中國官媒批評香港抗議者之廣告而受到檢視。
This month, the Senate committee investigating Russian interference in the 2016 US election said that the Kremlin’s best-known propaganda ( ) arm increased its social media activity after that vote. “The bottom line ( ) here is that elections have changed significantly ( ) since 2016 and Facebook has changed too,” Zuckerberg said on Oct. 21.
調查俄羅斯干預二○一六年美國大選的參議院委員會於本月表示,克里姆林宮最著名的政治宣傳部門,在該選舉後增加了在社群媒體上的活動。「總之,自二○一六年以來,選舉發生了重大變化,Facebook也發生了變化」,Zuckerberg十月二十一日表示。
“We face increasingly sophisticated ( ) attacks from nation states like Russia, Iran and China, but I’m confident we’re more prepared.”
Zuckerberg提到,「我們面臨來自俄羅斯、伊朗和中國等民族主義國家日益複雜精密的襲擊,但我相信我們已做好了充分的準備。」
Theories that China has interfered ( ) in US elections are absurd ( ) and laughable, said Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying at a regular press briefing in Beijing on Oct. 22. If someone says China interfered in the US election, they should provide proof, said Hua. China has never had any interest in interfering with other countries’ internal affairs, she said.
中國外交部發言人華春瑩十月二十二日在北京舉行的例行記者會上說,有關中國干預美國大選的說法是荒謬可笑的。華春瑩說,如果有人說中國干涉了美國大選,應該要提供證據。她說,中國對干涉他國內政從來沒有任何興趣。
Moscow and Tehran have also repeatedly denied the allegations ( ).
莫斯科和德黑蘭也一再否認這一指控。
Facebook will introduce a new US presidential candidate spend tracker ( ) to show how much they have spent on political ads as part of the company’s efforts to make its ad library easier to use, Zuckerberg said.
Zuckerberg說,Facebook將新推出美國總統候選人支出追蹤器,以顯示候選人在政治廣告上的支出,因該公司努力使其廣告庫更便於使用。
The company plans to heighten protection of the Facebook and Instagram accounts of candidates, elected officials and their teams through a program called Facebook Protect. Participants ( ) in the program will be required to turn on two-factor authentication and their accounts will be monitored ( ) for signs of hacking.
該公司計劃通透過名為「Facebook Protect」的計畫來加強對候選人、民選官員及其團隊的Facebook和 Instagram 帳號的保護。「Facebook Protect」用戶須通過兩階段身份驗證,Facebook會監控其帳戶是否有遭駭客入侵之跡象。
#高雄人 #學習英文 請找 #多益達人林立英文
#高中英文 #成人英文
#多益家教班 #商用英文
#國立大學外國語文學系講師
misinformation effect 在 Lee Hsien Loong Facebook 的最佳解答
There has been a lot of discussion about the CPF scheme. Unfortunately, some of the stuff online is inaccurate and confusing. Minister Tan Chuan-Jin announced in Parliament yesterday that the government will introduce a new one-on-one retirement planning service later this year. This will help CPF members understand the system and make better use of their CPF savings.
Came across this article by Mano Sabnani, the former Business Times editor, on misconceptions and facts about CPF. More information on CPF can be found here too. http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/CPF/About-Us/Intro/Intro.htm
- LHL
#SGBudget2015
Misconceptions on the CPF, the Minimum Sum Scheme, and the state of our national reserves are worrying...
*******************************************************************************************
You know, I have been thinking long and hard. And it disturbs me. There is so much misunderstanding and/or misinformation about our Central Provident Fund or CPF; whether the monies are safe; why CPF does not pay higher interest rates; why the government wants the Minimum Sum Scheme and have CPF monies actually been lost by the GIC or Temasek Holdings, the two state-owned investment entities.
Well, I don't have any special inside information on GIC or Temasek or the CPF. But from memory alone and years as a journalist covering some of these issues, I can say things are not as bad as they are made out to be. Our citizens deserve better, and that includes those who rely only on the internet for their information needs.
So here goes. A few pointers and hard facts. Hand on heart, I think these are largely correct. And this is not a defence of any entitity or the government. Just facts!
1. CPF monies are in safe hands; no risk of loss. Interest rate paid by CPF is above market rates for FDs or fixed deposits. Go check it out. The CPF interest rate is an outlier i.e unusually high for a zero-risk investment. As high as 5 per cent on the first $60,000 for some people
2. The Minimum Sum Scheme is an essential one. It should be made more flexible as planned but it should not be abandoned. The original purpose of CPF was to provide some income in old age and that is what MSS does.The withdrawal age has been pushed back for good reasons overall: Singaporeans are living longer and so total withdrawal at 55 years is unrealistic. Also vast sums of CPF money have been invested in property, and having the effect of reducing cash balances meant for retirement. Some liquidity for retirement needs has to be ensured via MSS
3. There are those who say the CPF vaults are empty and that is why the payments back to citizens are being delayed. This empty vault scare is total nonsense
Our reserves per capita are one of the highest in the world.. with GIC, Temasek and the statutory boards all holding sizeable sums. Sums that have grown over the years
4. Some online commentators, with due respect, don't understand how things work. CPF basically only buys special government bonds or securities, the proceeds of which are passed on to MAS and GIC for management. Its income is assured by returns on the special govt securities that it holds.
CPF does not invest directly in the GIC portfolio orTemasek portfolio. Why? It would be too risky to do so. But the corollary of that is that CPF cannot benefit from any windfall gains made by GIC or Temasek in certain years.
5. Another fact: our currency has been strong all these years because our foreign debt is low and reserves high, with relatively low inflation to boot. Singapore govt debt, while seemingly high, is largely domestic debt. It arises mainly because of the CPF scheme to ensure forced savings for all citizens.
It's not that the government wants to hold our money or needs it. Govt is simply CUSTODIAN of our CPF savings.
6 Another fact: GIC and Temasek have done relatively well over the longer term in investments. Yes; they lost money in some investments. But overall, over many years, tbey have been doing all right. Our national reserves are now probably in excess of $600 billion on a conservative, net of debt, basis
GIC could be more transparent?: I agree. That would silence its critics. But they have their reasons. Allowing citizens to know what exactly they hold and values arising could expose the country and its reserves to unnecessary scrutiny by hedge funds and other international market players. Better to be discreet; it is part of total defence!
7.The CPF Life insurance scheme is a good one. It stretches your Minimum Sum to ensure you receive monthly payouts ALL YOUR LIFE in return for relatively low premiums. All of us should take up that option. for our own sake!
Well, you have it. The basic facts. I'm sure there will be many views. Do comment with your own perspectives.
misinformation effect 在 Vania Mak Youtube 的最佳貼文
YouTube was first launched in 2005, and now has become one of the most visited websites in the history of the internet.
Before 2012, YouTube paid content creators based on the number of views. Even though a 5-second video was deemed successful depending on the view count, which posed the problems of “clickbait” titles and thumbnails. Since 2012, YouTube started measuring “View Duration” and used that as the metric. For those videos being viewed longer, they were likely to be promoted in search engines and have more financial rewards to the content creators. This decision has changed how YouTube videos were recommended and rewarded.
YouTube’s recommendation algorithms connect the existing channels based on users’ watch histories, preferences and overlap. Harvard’s researchers claimed that the pre-selection factors remained unknown. With all of those suggested videos in the sidebar, people tend to click into unfamiliar topics due to curiosity. YouTube has long been criticized for spreading misinformation. Jonas Kaiser, the affiliate at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University, described the recommendation progress as a “rabbit hole effect” in which leading viewers to more extreme contents.
![post-title](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/pPYuNaKJmkI/hqdefault.jpg)
misinformation effect 在 Elizabeth Loftus and The Misinformation Effect - YouTube 的推薦與評價
![影片讀取中](/images/youtube.png)
https://www.learnmytest.com/Publictaketest/publicTestLink/WVAjD6vuHHoM2pKf9YQR6DcyuYp72np_Bx_xnfdEMBQLoftus's Ted Talk: ... ... <看更多>
misinformation effect 在 The science behind why fake news is so hard to wipe out - Vox 的推薦與評價
It's time for Facebook and Google to pay attention to the psychology of the illusory truth effect. ... <看更多>
misinformation effect 在 The Misinformation Effect - YouTube 的推薦與評價
Psychology shows us that memory is far from a perfect photograph. In fact, it is a little bit more like a Wikipedia page. ... <看更多>