Having dry and sensitive skin is more than just frustrating - it can be
both painful and embarrassing as well. Therefore, it is something
that need to be deal with at this point.
.
Same as most of you, I’ve been facing this issue for years and
now, I’m so delighted to share that it had finally been resolved!
My skin instantly feel “soothed” after applying the Dermal Therapy
Very Dry Skin Lotion and after the usage of several weeks, I had
seen visible results! It helps to relieve my dry and sensitive skin
problem effectively! Swipe right to check out my current skin
condition!
.
I really love its texture as it is a non-greasy formula which is suitable
to use on the whole body. It is my all-time favourite lotion now and
I always apply after shower for best result! So if you have tried
plenty different lotions or creams but none of them have worked,
try this out now and I am sure you will thank me later! 😉
.
@dermaltherapymalaysia
#dermaltherapymalaysia
同時也有16部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過19萬的網紅OmegaGamesWiki™,也在其Youtube影片中提到,PS4 PRO版のTHE LAST OF US PART 2の難易度サバイバル、ノーダメージ&100%収集品攻略動画です、Part 2。 過激なムービーシーンがYouTubeのガイドライン違反になる可能性があるため、そういうシーンは編集でカットします、申し訳ございません。 PART 2 ・CHA...
「non none」的推薦目錄:
- 關於non none 在 Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於non none 在 Mordeth13 Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於non none 在 丹眼看電影 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於non none 在 OmegaGamesWiki™ Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於non none 在 OmegaGamesWiki™ Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於non none 在 MONGABONG Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於non none 在 Non None - YouTube 的評價
- 關於non none 在 Getting the first non None value from list - Stack Overflow 的評價
- 關於non none 在 Failure to detect non-None Optional type in conditional ... 的評價
- 關於non none 在 Handling Missing Data | Python Data Science Handbook 的評價
non none 在 Mordeth13 Facebook 的精選貼文
Jenna Cody :
Is Taiwan a real China?
No, and with the exception of a few intervening decades - here’s the part that’ll surprise you - it never has been.
This’ll blow your mind too: that it never has been doesn’t matter.
So let’s start with what doesn’t actually matter.
Until the 1600s, Taiwan was indigenous. Indigenous Taiwanese are not Chinese, they’re Austronesian. Then it was a Dutch colony (note: I do not say “it was Dutch”, I say it was a Dutch colony). Then it was taken over by Ming loyalists at the end of the Ming dynasty (the Ming loyalists were breakaways, not a part of the new Qing court. Any overlap in Ming rule and Ming loyalist conquest of Taiwan was so brief as to be inconsequential).
Only then, in the late 1600s, was it taken over by the Chinese (Qing). But here’s the thing, it was more like a colony of the Qing, treated as - to use Emma Teng’s wording in Taiwan’s Imagined Geography - a barrier or barricade keeping the ‘real’ Qing China safe. In fact, the Qing didn’t even want Taiwan at first, the emperor called it “a ball of mud beyond the pale of civilization”. Prior to that, and to a great extent at that time, there was no concept on the part of China that Taiwan was Chinese, even though Chinese immigrants began moving to Taiwan under Dutch colonial rule (mostly encouraged by the Dutch, to work as laborers). When the Spanish landed in the north of Taiwan, it was the Dutch, not the Chinese, who kicked them out.
Under Qing colonial rule - and yes, I am choosing my words carefully - China only controlled the Western half of Taiwan. They didn’t even have maps for the eastern half. That’s how uninterested in it they were. I can’t say that the Qing controlled “Taiwan”, they only had power over part of it.
Note that the Qing were Manchu, which at the time of their conquest had not been a part of China: China itself essentially became a Manchu imperial holding, and Taiwan did as well, once they were convinced it was not a “ball of mud” but actually worth taking. Taiwan was not treated the same way as the rest of “Qing China”, and was not administered as a province until (I believe) 1887. So that’s around 200 years of Taiwan being a colony of the Qing.
What happened in the late 19th century to change China’s mind? Japan. A Japanese ship was shipwrecked in eastern Taiwan in the 1870s, and the crew was killed by hostile indigenous people in what is known as the Mudan Incident. A Japanese emissary mission went to China to inquire about what could be done, only to be told that China had no control there and if they went to eastern Taiwan, they did so at their own peril. China had not intended to imply that Taiwan wasn’t theirs, but they did. Japan - and other foreign powers, as France also attempted an invasion - were showing an interest in Taiwan, so China decided to cement its claim, started mapping the entire island, and made it a province.
So, I suppose for a decade or so Taiwan was a part of China. A China that no longer exists.
It remained a province until 1895, when it was ceded to Japan after the (first) Sino-Japanese War. Before that could happen, Taiwan declared itself a Republic, although it was essentially a Qing puppet state (though the history here is interesting - correspondence at the time indicates that the leaders of this ‘Republic of Taiwan’ considered themselves Chinese, and the tiger flag hints at this as well. However, the constitution was a very republican document, not something you’d expect to see in Qing-era China.) That lasted for less than a year, when the Japanese took it by force.
This is important for two reasons - the first is that some interpretations of IR theory state that when a colonial holding is released, it should revert to the state it was in before it was taken as a colony. In this case, that would actually be The Republic of Taiwan, not Qing-era China. Secondly, it puts to rest all notions that there was no Taiwan autonomy movement prior to 1947.
In any case, it would be impossible to revert to its previous state, as the government that controlled it - the Qing empire - no longer exists. The current government of China - the PRC - has never controlled it.
After the Japanese colonial era, there is a whole web of treaties and agreements that do not satisfactorily settle the status of Taiwan. None of them actually do so - those which explicitly state that Taiwan is to be given to the Republic of China (such as the Cairo declaration) are non-binding. Those that are binding do not settle the status of Taiwan (neither the treaty of San Francisco nor the Treaty of Taipei definitively say that Taiwan is a part of China, or even which China it is - the Treaty of Taipei sets out what nationality the Taiwanese are to be considered, but that doesn’t determine territorial claims). Treaty-wise, the status of Taiwan is “undetermined”.
Under more modern interpretations, what a state needs to be a state is…lessee…a contiguous territory, a government, a military, a currency…maybe I’m forgetting something, but Taiwan has all of it. For all intents and purposes it is independent already.
In fact, in the time when all of these agreements were made, the Allied powers weren’t as sure as you might have learned about what to do with Taiwan. They weren’t a big fan of Chiang Kai-shek, didn’t want it to go Communist, and discussed an Allied trusteeship (which would have led to independence) or backing local autonomy movements (which did exist). That it became what it did - “the ROC” but not China - was an accident (as Hsiao-ting Lin lays out in Accidental State).
In fact, the KMT knew this, and at the time the foreign minister (George Yeh) stated something to the effect that they were aware they were ‘squatters’ in Taiwan.
Since then, it’s true that the ROC claims to be the rightful government of Taiwan, however, that hardly matters when considering the future of Taiwan simply because they have no choice. To divest themselves of all such claims (and, presumably, change their name) would be considered by the PRC to be a declaration of formal independence. So that they have not done so is not a sign that they wish to retain the claim, merely that they wish to avoid a war.
It’s also true that most Taiwanese are ethnically “Han” (alongside indigenous and Hakka, although Hakka are, according to many, technically Han…but I don’t think that’s relevant here). But biology is not destiny: what ethnicity someone is shouldn’t determine what government they must be ruled by.
Through all of this, the Taiwanese have evolved their own culture, identity and sense of history. They are diverse in a way unique to Taiwan, having been a part of Austronesian and later Hoklo trade routes through Southeast Asia for millenia. Now, one in five (I’ve heard one in four, actually) Taiwanese children has a foreign parent. The Taiwanese language (which is not Mandarin - that’s a KMT transplant language forced on Taiwanese) is gaining popularity as people discover their history. Visiting Taiwan and China, it is clear where the cultural differences are, not least in terms of civic engagement. This morning, a group of legislators were removed after a weekend-long pro-labor hunger strike in front of the presidential palace. They were not arrested and will not be. Right now, a group of pro-labor protesters is lying down on the tracks at Taipei Main Station to protest the new labor law amendments.
This would never be allowed in China, but Taiwanese take it as a fiercely-guarded basic right.
*
Now, as I said, none of this matters.
What matters is self-determination. If you believe in democracy, you believe that every state (and Taiwan does fit the definition of a state) that wants to be democratic - that already is democratic and wishes to remain that way - has the right to self-determination. In fact, every nation does. You cannot be pro-democracy and also believe that it is acceptable to deprive people of this right, especially if they already have it.
Taiwan is already a democracy. That means it has the right to determine its own future. Period.
Even under the ROC, Taiwan was not allowed to determine its future. The KMT just arrived from China and claimed it. The Taiwanese were never asked if they consented. What do we call it when a foreign government arrives in land they had not previously governed and declares itself the legitimate governing power of that land without the consent of the local people? We call that colonialism.
Under this definition, the ROC can also be said to be a colonial power in Taiwan. They forced Mandarin - previously not a language native to Taiwan - onto the people, taught Chinese history, geography and culture, and insisted that the Taiwanese learn they were Chinese - not Taiwanese (and certainly not Japanese). This was forced on them. It was not chosen. Some, for awhile, swallowed it. Many didn’t. The independence movement only grew, and truly blossomed after democratization - something the Taiwanese fought for and won, not something handed to them by the KMT.
So what matters is what the Taiwanese want, not what the ROC is forced to claim. I cannot stress this enough - if you do not believe Taiwan has the right to this, you do not believe in democracy.
And poll after poll shows it: Taiwanese identify more as Taiwanese than Chinese (those who identify as both primarily identify as Taiwanese, just as I identify as American and Armenian, but primarily as American. Armenian is merely my ethnicity). They overwhelmingly support not unifying with China. The vast majority who support the status quo support one that leads to eventual de jure independence, not unification. The status quo is not - and cannot be - an endgame (if only because China has declared so, but also because it is untenable). Less than 10% want unification. Only a small number (a very small minority) would countenance unification in the future…even if China were to democratize.
The issue isn’t the incompatibility of the systems - it’s that the Taiwanese fundamentally do not see themselves as Chinese.
A change in China’s system won’t change that. It’s not an ethnic nationalism - there is no ethnic argument for Taiwan (or any nation - didn’t we learn in the 20th century what ethnicity-based nation-building leads to? Nothing good). It’s not a jingoistic or xenophobic nationalism - Taiwanese know that to be dangerous. It’s a nationalism based on shared identity, culture, history and civics. The healthiest kind of nationalism there is. Taiwan exists because the Taiwanese identify with it. Period.
There are debates about how long the status quo should go on, and what we should risk to insist on formal recognition. However, the question of whether or not to be Taiwan, not China…
…well, that’s already settled.
The Taiwanese have spoken and they are not Chinese.
Whatever y’all think about that doesn’t matter. That’s what they want, and if you believe in self-determination you will respect it.
If you don’t, good luck with your authoritarian nonsense, but Taiwan wants nothing to do with it.
non none 在 丹眼看電影 Facebook 的最佳解答
【談《少年的你》為何能代表香港入選奧斯卡最佳國際電影獎的短名單】(註:為使議題聚焦,重Po一篇)
Q: 奧斯卡審核外語片(國際電影)報名的標準為何?
A: 除了該片的英語佔比、電影格式與長度、上映方式、創作主導權之外,並無限制可報名電影之語種、投資方、拍攝地點、內容主題、目標市場、改編原作等。
其中所謂的「創作主導權」意指:報名國家必須認證該部片的創作主導權,大部分落在該國的公民或居留者手上。("The submitting country must certify that creative control of the film was largely in the hands of citizens or residents of that country." - 奧斯卡規則§13-B-5: https://www.oscars.org/sites/oscars/files/93aa_rules.pdf )
-
Q: 為何《色,戒》當年會被駁回報名資格?
A: 根據奧斯卡當年執行總監 Bruce Davis 的回應,他們對於「創作主導權」的細部審查分三大項:(1)核心團隊 (2)主要演員 (3)幕後主創。
《色,戒》在核心團隊(編/導/製)是沒問題的,但是在主要演員跟幕後主創團隊的部門主管,都是不符合資格的(都沒有台灣人)。更確切來說,他們看的幕後要員主要為:美術設計、攝影師、剪輯師、配樂、服裝設計師及音效師六個職位。
‘The Academy looks at three areas: “First, the writer-director-producer area -- you have to have artists representing the submitting nation well represented in those three areas -- and that film (‘Lust, Caution’) has no problem there. Then you look at cast -- and none of the principal cast are from Taiwan. And then you move into the department heads -- cinematographer, production designer, sound mixer -- and nobody’s from Taiwan. That’s a problem.” ‘ - https://www.reuters.com/article/us-oscars-foreign-idUSN0828069820071109
根據蘋果日報當年報導,影藝學院的來函解釋表示:「我們要求報名國家的藝術工作者,至少要在電影中擔任部分重要創作職務,但本片的美術設計、攝影師、剪輯師、配樂、服裝設計師及音效師都不是中華民國的電影工作者,有違該片代表貴國參賽的資格。 」 - https://tw.appledaily.com/headline/20071019/GZ25AVTSAI4BBEKR6XGHRKHLB4/
根據另一個新聞來源,影藝學院當年的發言人 Leslie Unger 也稱《色,戒》主要是違反了幕後主創的細則條款:"The film was disqualified because the rules require that creative talent from the submitting nation head up at least a few of the key areas beyond producer/director/writer. The cinematographer, editor, composer, production designer, costume designer, sound mixer and the principal cast members [of Lust, Caution] were all non-Taiwanese." - https://www.screendaily.com/academy-stands-by-decision-to-disqualify-lust-caution-for-taiwan/4035499.article
-
Q: 那為何《少年的你》今年卻具備奧斯卡入選資格,可以代表香港競獎呢?
A: 《少年的你》的(1)核心團隊 (2)主要演員 兩項指標都如《色,戒》相仿——儘管核心的編/導/製皆為香港人,但主要演員都是中國人。因此,就要看幕後主創:美術設計、攝影師、剪輯師、配樂、服裝設計師及音效師。
《色,戒》的這六個職位皆非台灣人,反之,《少年的你》的服裝設計為香港人。或許我們無法得知奧斯卡評斷的準則是切在哪一條線(threshold),但就這一關鍵差異,就無法將這兩部片相提並論。簡單來說,依據奧斯卡規則來看,《少年的你》的「港度」,就是比《色,戒》的「台度」還要高出一些。
另外還有一個可能性,就是對奧斯卡(或任何國際組織)而言,若要認定中國與香港是同一個國籍,也無可厚非。奧斯卡的規則裡面用的文字是 “country” 而非 “region”。
-
Q: 那為何《臥虎藏龍》(2000)當年可以代表台灣,《色,戒》(2007)就不行?
A: 確實,《臥虎藏龍》的演員和幕後團隊也幾乎都不是台灣人,然而李安詢問奧斯卡的結果表示,「《色,戒》不符合奧斯卡『今年新增三項細則』的第二項」,也就是說,「審查 (1)核心團隊 (2)主要演員 (3)幕後主創」這樣的細則是從 2007 才新增的內部細則。(來源:上方蘋果日報連結)
奧斯卡能否新增/訂定內部施行細則?當然可以,根據公開規章,奧斯卡保有所有規則的最終解釋權。(2007: “The Academy will make the final determination in all questions of eligibility.” - https://web.archive.org/web/20080314002549/http://www.oscars.org/79academyawards/rules/rule14.html ; 2021: “The International Feature Film Executive Committee shall resolve all questions of eligibility and rules.” - https://www.oscars.org/sites/oscars/files/93aa_rules.pdf )
簡單來說,就是就是奧斯卡說的算。
任何人都可以質疑奧斯卡的遊戲規則是否合理(事實上每年都有許多討論),然而當影藝學院已在去年公布本屆規則、本屆符合資格的報名片單,卻是在今年短名單出來後才大喊作弊,不免有些遲了。
-
Q: 就算符合奧斯卡規則,但憑什麼《少年的你》可以代表香港?這完全不是一部香港人認可的「港片」阿。
A: 奧斯卡無權干涉各國推派哪部片參賽。《少年的你》由「香港電影製片家協會」投票決定,獲得多數委員支持而代表香港參賽。若認為這部片無法代表香港,或是有抄襲爭議等等,理應去批判香港電影製片家協會的遴選方式,而非將矛頭指向奧斯卡。
總結來說,一件事情本來就可以有多層次的討論,單就奧斯卡規則而言,我找不到「《少年的你》代表香港參加 2021 奧斯卡」這件事情違反規則的證據,也因此,於「法」而言並無問題。(當然,若有人找到反對意見的證據,我也樂於受教)。
non none 在 OmegaGamesWiki™ Youtube 的精選貼文
PS4 PRO版のTHE LAST OF US PART 2の難易度サバイバル、ノーダメージ&100%収集品攻略動画です、Part 2。
過激なムービーシーンがYouTubeのガイドライン違反になる可能性があるため、そういうシーンは編集でカットします、申し訳ございません。
PART 2
・CHATPER 4: Patrol
・CHATPER 5:The Horde 38:50
・CHAPTER 6: The Chalet 46:25
・NEW GAME
・SURVIVOR DIFFICULTY
・NO DAMAGE
・STEALTHY WAY
・100% COLLECTIBLES(127 Artifacts, 20 Journal Entries, 48 Trading Cards, 32 Coins, 14 Safes, 8 Training Manuals, 25 Workbenches, 12 Weapons)
収集品/COLLECTIBLES(Artifacts: 6, Trading Cards: 2, Journal Entries: 2, Workbenches: 1, Safes: 1):
CHAPTER 4 - Patrol(全12個)
1) Journal Entry(1/20)2:55
2) Artifact: A Note to Santa(3/127)8:05
3) Trading Card: Tesseracter(3/48)9:07
4) Artifact: Supermarket Apology(4/127)16:26
5) Artifact: Good Boy Combo(5/127)19:15
6) Safe(1/14) (Password = 07-20-13) 19:29
7) Artifact: Eugene’s Firefly Pendant(6/127)30:02
8) Journal Entry(2/20)30:36
9) Trading Card: Laurent Foucalt, CEO SPARK(4/48)31:02
10) Artifact: Eugene’s Ultimatum(7/127)31:40
11) Artifact: Photo of Eugene and Tommy(8/127)32:04
12) Workbench(1/25)32:47
CHAPTER 5 - The Horde
なし/NONE
CHAPTER 6 - The Chalet
なし/NONE
サムネイル製作:K.K
LAST OF US PART II - SURVIVOR DIFFICULT NO DAMAGE 100% COLLECTIBLES WALKTHROUGH PLAYLIST:
⇒https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4fd59i0eA3Vh4HZ0-w3Ro53FJSA-AQnd
LAST OF US REMASTERED - GROUNDED DIFFICULT NO DAMAGE NO UPGRADE 100% COLLECTIBLES WALKTHROUGH PLAYLIST:
⇒https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4fd59i0eA3X7ueDVvMwh_kZ_1Pm2VvOz
======================
- ゲームタイトル: ラストオブアス パーツ2/THE LAST OF US PART 2(PS4版)
- 発売日: 2020年6月19日
- 価格: PS4版:6,900円+税
- ジャンル : サバイバルアクション
- ESRB : Cero Z
- 開発: NAUGHTY DOG
- 発売: (株)ソニー・インタラクティブエンタテインメント
=======================
#LastOfUsPart2 #SURVIVOR #AllCollectibles
=======================
"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976,
allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism,
comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise
be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance
in favor of fair use."
=======================
non none 在 OmegaGamesWiki™ Youtube 的最讚貼文
PS4 PRO版のTHE LAST OF US PART 2の難易度サバイバル、ノーダメージ&100%収集品攻略動画です。
過激なムービーシーンがYouTubeのガイドライン違反になる可能性があるため、そういうシーンは編集でカットします、申し訳ございません。
PART 1
・CHATPER 1: Prologue
・CHATPER 2: Waking Up 14:48
・CHAPTER 3: The Overlook 27:50
・NEW GAME
・SURVIVOR DIFFICULTY
・NO DAMAGE
・STEALTHY WAY
・100% COLLECTIBLES(127 Artifacts, 20 Journal Entries, 48 Trading Cards, 32 Coins, 14 Safes, 8 Training Manuals, 25 Workbenches, 12 Weapons)
収集品/COLLECTIBLES:
CHAPTER 1 - Prologue
・なし/NONE
CHAPTER 2 - Waking Up(全3個)
1) Trading Card: Seismicayla(1/48)18:09
2) Artifact: Volunteer Receipt(1/127)19:13
3) Trading Card: The Keene Twins(2/48)21:20
CHAPTER 3 - The Overlook(全1個)
1) Artifact(2/127)38:13
サムネイル製作:K.K
LAST OF US PART II - SURVIVOR DIFFICULT NO DAMAGE 100% COLLECTIBLES WALKTHROUGH PLAYLIST:
⇒https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4fd59i0eA3Vh4HZ0-w3Ro53FJSA-AQnd
LAST OF US REMASTERED - GROUNDED DIFFICULT NO DAMAGE NO UPGRADE 100% COLLECTIBLES WALKTHROUGH PLAYLIST:
⇒https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4fd59i0eA3X7ueDVvMwh_kZ_1Pm2VvOz
======================
- ゲームタイトル: ラストオブアス パーツ2/THE LAST OF US PART 2(PS4版)
- 発売日: 2020年6月19日
- 価格: PS4版:6,900円+税
- ジャンル : サバイバルアクション
- ESRB : Cero Z
- 開発: NAUGHTY DOG
- 発売: (株)ソニー・インタラクティブエンタテインメント
=======================
#LastOfUsPart2 #ラストオブアス2 #100%COLLECTIBLES
=======================
"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976,
allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism,
comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise
be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance
in favor of fair use."
=======================
non none 在 MONGABONG Youtube 的最讚貼文
Sharing with you guys these nail solutions by Dashing Diva! Literally took me less than 5 minutes to get a set of beautiful manicure done, and they make me feel so pretty and dainty! ✨
If you’re like me and have ZERO nail beautifying skills, these easy DIY nails will make you feel like a PRO! Talk to me in the comments box below and let me know what you think! I love how they turned out ?
Use “MONGCHINXDV” for 10% off + Free Magic Pop stickers (this is a non-affiliate code)
When shopping on their website!
More about Dashing Diva: https://dashingdiva.com.sg/
Instagram: @dashingdiva_sg
PRODUCTS MENTIONED :
? Dashing Diva Magic Press Nails MDR604 Delight Yellow
https://bit.ly/2Y1SEQr
? Dashing Diva Gloss Gel Nail Strips Gloss Nail Palette GVP155 Freesia Passion
https://bit.ly/2MvY6pm
FOLLOW ME
► Instagram: http://instagram.com/mongabong
► TikTok: www.tiktok.com/@mongabong
► Snapchat: @mongabong
► Blog: www.mongabong.com
► Email: hello@mongabong.com
FAQ
Hello! My name is Mong Chin and I'm from sunny Singapore. I am 1.63m and I am singaporean Chinese. I speak English, Mandarin and am currently learning Korean in my free time. I love all things beauty and fashion, and I also like to share my life here. I hope you guys enjoy watching my videos!
DISCLAIMER
Special thanks to Dashing Diva for sponsoring some of the items used in this video. None of the links are affiliate links - I don't make money off of any purchase and they don't cost you anything extra!
Hope you guys enjoyed this video! Let me know what other video you would like to see and I’ll try my best to fulfil them for you guys! Love y’all and stay safe ❤️
non none 在 Failure to detect non-None Optional type in conditional ... 的推薦與評價
Failure to detect non-None Optional type in conditional expression #6755. Closed. jonafato opened this issue on May 1, 2019 · 6 comments. ... <看更多>
non none 在 Non None - YouTube 的推薦與評價
Non None. •. •. Updated today. Easy Come Easy Go (feat. MC HotDog熱狗). 3:47 · 何妨feat.茄子蛋. 4:31 · View full playlist. Show more ... ... <看更多>