【Demo Day 2020 精彩回顧 - WASAI Technology 】#Englishbelow
WASAI 提供絕佳的資料處理方案,他們的 FPGA 加速晶片平台以及相應優化的硬體架構,建構了一個大數據處理的加速引擎,比傳統的處理方法快六倍以上! 現在WASAI將攜著過人的數據處理技術進入了基因分析的領域,提出了一套具高精確性及穩定性的基因定序分析方法。
AppWorks Accelerator #22 正在招募 AI / IoT, Blockchain / DeFi, or Southeast Asia 團隊!現在就申請加入大東南亞區最大的創業者社群:https://bit.ly/3mmCGLA
WASAI, abbreviation for We Accelerate System Architecture & Infrastructure, offers a well-tailored solution for data processing. Its FPGA accelerator for Big Data Hadoop platform and optimized architectural design for Data Centers speed up keyword searching and key value sorting at 6x. Now WASAI enters the field of genomic analysis with its data processing power and provides an All-in-one DNA Sequencing Acceleration solution with high accuracy and consistency.
If you are a AI / IoT, Blockchain / DeFi, or Southeast Asia startup, apply to join the strongest founders community in GSEA today >> https://bit.ly/3mmCGLA
同時也有10000部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル,也在其Youtube影片中提到,...
「power system analysis」的推薦目錄:
- 關於power system analysis 在 AppWorks Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於power system analysis 在 李怡 Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於power system analysis 在 許文昌 Man-cheong Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於power system analysis 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於power system analysis 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於power system analysis 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於power system analysis 在 Power System Analysis (fault analysis)-1 - YouTube 的評價
- 關於power system analysis 在 Power Systems Analysis, Fall 2020 - Baosen Zhang 的評價
- 關於power system analysis 在 power-systems-analysis · GitHub Topics 的評價
power system analysis 在 李怡 Facebook 的最讚貼文
Is a U.S.-China hot war imminent?|Lee Yee
In July, Pompeo claimed the American policy towards China is harsher than the one towards the Soviet Union in the Cold War era. The approach has been shifted from “listening to its words and watching its deeds” to “ignoring its words and only watching its deeds”. Recent developments show that the U.S. is striding closer and closer to a complete de-linkage with China. The recall of the ambassador from China was just a prelude. What followed was the U.S. official interpretation that “one China policy” is not equivalent to “one China principle”, plus the emphasis that “the U.S. holds no specific standpoint towards the sovereignty of Taiwan”. Furthermore, during the visit of Krach, U.S. Under Secretary of State, Tsai Ing-wen stated that “Taiwan has the determination to take the critical step”. Adding fuel to this, Hsiao Bi Khim, Taiwan’s delegate at the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the U.S., introduced herself as the “Taiwan Ambassador to the U.S.” on Twitter. In view of all these, is the U.S. going to establish diplomatic relation with Taiwan? Will it turn out to be the “October surprise” before the U.S. presidential election? In response, China dispatched fighter jets to violate the airspace of Taiwan, and as “Global Times” put it, “this was not a gesture of warning, but an actual combat exercise of attacking Taiwan”. In return, Taiwan authority urged China “not to underestimate its armed forces' resolve in safeguarding Taiwan”. As tension keeps building up across the Strait, will the U.S. intervene and finally trigger a U.S.-China hot war?
For the last few months, while analyzing the situation, quite a few observers have drawn upon the “Thucydides trap” originated from an ancient Greek historian. According to this theory, when an emerging power threatens to displace an existing great power as an international hegemony, there will be an unavoidable tendency towards war.
To be frank, these observers may have well overestimated the strength of China. Thanks to its huge population, China has become the second largest economic entity in the world. But we are now living in an era that national strength is rather defined by technological advancement. In reality, China is militarily inferior to Russia and technologically lagging far behind major western countries. To put it simply, China is yet to be capable of challenging the American dominance.
Back in the 1980s, in the heyday of its economic development, Japan has significantly outperformed the U.S. in the capital market, and some American scholars have come to the “Japan No.1” conclusion. Despite this, there was never a sign of military confrontation between U.S. and Japan. A decade later, the formation of the European Union posed new challenge to the American supremacy. But again, the two did not come anywhere close to a war. So why has the emergence of China, which in fact lacks the capabilities to overwhelm the U.S., aroused much anticipation of war?
Rudolph Rummel, an American professor of political studies, have made a thorough analysis on the correlation between wars and democracy in human history. After humans surviving a thousand years of darkness, it was not until the independence of the U.S. in 1776 that unveiled a democratic institution with public elections, separation of powers, multi-party system as well as freedom of speech, press, religion and assembly. After more than a hundred years, in 1900 there were only 13 democratic countries in the world. And after another decade, in 2015 the rose to 130, and dictatorial states without meaningful elections have become the minority.
According to Rummel’s statistics, there were 371 wars between 1816 and 2005. Among them, 205 were fought between two dictatorial countries and 166 between democratic and dictatorial ones. Interestingly, there had not been a single war between democratic countries. The conclusion is all too obvious: if there were only democratic states on earth, wars would not happen.
And here lies the fundamental reason why the “Thucydides Trap” has been more valid in the old days when dictatorial systems prevailed, but has failed to apply in contemporary cases between two democratic countries. And it also explains why the competitions between the U.S. and Japan or the EU have not led to any war, while the challenge from China will probably end up differently.
In a democratic system, to wage a war requires a consensus among the government, legislature, media and public opinion. It is rather a matter of the people’s collective will than the ruler’s subjective decision. Whereas within a dictatorial structure, no approval from the legislature is needed, media and public opinion are never respected and judicial challenge simply does not exist. A dictator or oligarch can just go to war at will.
From a dictator’s point of view, whether to enter a war or not is not subject to external circumstance, but the domestic status of his ruling. When a dictator’s position gets shaken by severe economic downturn and widespread public discontent, he will try to divert domestic dissatisfaction by means of foreign maneuvers. The dictator tends to single out those “non-conforming groups”, as so identified by the “little pink” Chinese patriots, and tries bullying them, as what the CCP is doing in India, Hong Kong and Inner Mongolia. The objective is to distract attention with extreme nationalism. More often than not, stirring up external instability has become a tactic to secure domestic stability of the dictator’s rule.
Perhaps a shrewd dictator will weigh up the strength of his counterpart before taking action. Nevertheless, the intrinsically defective system may hinder the dictator from understanding the reality and accessing different views. And personal intellectual and intelligent inadequacies may also breed unrealistic self-inflating belief. The resulted stupidity can make a tragedy more imminent than everyone may expect.
power system analysis 在 許文昌 Man-cheong Facebook 的精選貼文
加拿大環球郵報直接上振華辦公室,調查挖掘其經營內容,高。
A shorter list of 3,767 Canadians have been assigned a grade of 1, 2 or 3 by the creators of the database. Those assigned a 1 appeared to be people of direct influence, such as mayors, MPs, or senior civil servants, while those assigned a 2 were often relatives of people in power, such as Mr. Trudeau’s daughter and Ms. Fry’s son. Those assigned a grade of 3 often had criminal convictions, mostly for economic crimes.
Zhenhua’s data is structured in a way similar to Factiva, a research tool from Dow Jones that also catalogues influential people from around the world. In fact, the woman at the Zhenhua office likened the company’s products to that of Dow Jones and Wind Information, a Chinese provider.
Zhenhua’s clients are in government, military, universities and academic institutes, the woman at the company said, suggesting they can use the company’s technology to “conduct a more detailed analysis of a certain professor.” She suggested that the company is not a mere technology provider, but its employees actively work with customers. Zhenhua employees are based in different cities in China, including Nanjing and Wuhan, because “our client base is relatively special,” she said.
Online, Zhenhua stresses its military connections. Two of its employees mention military-related tasks on their LinkedIn posts: a senior R&D engineer describes working on a “social media cultivation system, and military deployment simulation demonstration system,” while a product sales manager discusses “mining military customers' business needs for overseas data.” A job posting seeks a candidate that can manage sales and focus “management systems at the direction of the Party, government, and military.”
Zhenhua also lists a series of corporate partners with ties to the security establishment. Wenge Group uses big data and artificial intelligence to aid “smart law enforcement.” LSSEC Tech provides encryption tools and IT equipment to national security and military customers and has trained its employees to keep secrets on weaponry research. GTCOM sifts social media to spot the development of heated public opinion, equipping authorities to “minimize the probability of group incidents.” TRS lists the police and the Party as customers for software services that include online relationship mining, a “public opinion management system” and a “crystal ball intelligence analysis platform.” CHRTC provides “urban governance” products to the country’s security apparatus.
power system analysis 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的最讚貼文
power system analysis 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳解答
power system analysis 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳貼文
power system analysis 在 Power Systems Analysis, Fall 2020 - Baosen Zhang 的推薦與評價
Class Syllabus. This course considers the operation of power systems. We will define and discuss the major problems in steady state power system analysis, ... ... <看更多>
power system analysis 在 power-systems-analysis · GitHub Topics 的推薦與評價
A library of power system component models written in the Modelica language that can be used for power system dynamic analysis, such as phasor time-domain ... ... <看更多>
power system analysis 在 Power System Analysis (fault analysis)-1 - YouTube 的推薦與評價
power system Analysisfor doubts you can visit https://apexclass.in/ ... <看更多>