澳洲總理莫里森下令徹查中共滲透政界一事,打蛇隨棍上,麻煩大家再推一次,致函澳洲議員促請國會通過人權法International Human Rights and Corruption (Magnitsky Sanctions) Bill制裁中共。今次鬧大的主要原因,是證據指明中共在澳洲殺叛諜:
//根據澳洲世紀報(The Age)報導,中國情報單位透過陳姓墨爾本商人(Brian Chen),給予澳洲自由黨黨員、墨爾本豪車經銷商趙博(音譯,Bo “Nick” Zhao)100萬澳幣,要他投入議會選舉,趙波1年前向「澳洲安全情報組織」(ASIO)坦承此事。然而,趙波今年3月在墨爾本一間旅店內離奇死亡,目前警方仍未查出趙波的死因。//
這個陳春生野心不小,他的任務是替中共入侵澳洲的藥業竊取機密。初創公司Imunexus在深圳的生物技術比賽中獲得亞軍後,陳春生及其香港公司Prospect Time就在2017年6月接觸這間公司,覬覦它正研發抗體,揭示中國所舉辦的創科大賽就是共諜揀蟀的實驗場。
陳春生先擲1000萬澳元收購股份,再答應提供幾億元研究資金,一間初創怎能不心動?但原來中共的目標不是Imunexus,而是看中這間公司在墨爾本Parkville的生物技術中心的CSIRO大樓設有實驗室,計劃借Imunexus的名義租用側翼整層,以便共諜暢行CSIRO的每一間公司予取予竊。
CSIRO在2013年曾被中國黑客竊取大批機密,花費數千萬澳元升級網絡安全系統,大大增加了中共再入侵的難度,因此陳春生的任務可謂「任重道遠」。然而,他一見澳洲的國安審查官員便露了底,英文爛透,要靠兩個翻譯幫手,而且講不出為甚麼要浪費那麼多錢收購,結果計劃告吹。
澳媒亦踢爆他曾在G20和APEC等政治峰會冒充國際媒體記者,傳媒亦是中共的主要滲透基地,新華社香港分部就是中聯辦的前身,而那些國安人員大多都報稱自己是記者和編輯,進行「聯絡」工作。在匪語,聯絡即是諜務。總部位於香港的中華報業集團官網顯示,陳春生是該公司的「14號新聞工作者」。陳春生之後收買澳洲華裔自由黨人李博,慫恿他競選墨爾本Chisholm區的國會議員。哪知李博年初向ASIO告發,踏上了死路,3月離奇倒斃在汽車旅館。
張曉明曾說:「你們能活着,已顯出中央的包容。」
《悉尼晨鋒報》指陳春生利用一帶一路作掩飾進行間諜工作,他的香港公司Prospect Time International Investments(德鴻國際投資有限公司)與中國兵器工業集團有來往,並做極多國際生意:
//2017年5月,陳春生與泰國前總理英祿、泰國前首相頌猜會面,並與多名政商人士討論合作。隨後,他又前往馬爾代夫,與該國副總統Abdulla Jihad討論一帶一路計劃。2017年7月底,陳春生帶領著一支精英團隊訪問了太平洋島國帕勞,商討價值1.5億澳元的酒店開發項目。2018年5月,他也在菲律賓宣傳基建項目。//
Prospect Time的聯席董事王振海,被指與中共統戰部有關聯,還大打高球外交:
//2018年,王振海被拍到在一場活動當中,向維州州長Daniel Andrews的高級顧問Marty Mei,授予中國商人高爾夫球協會會員資格。在那場活動當中,王振海還被墨爾本華商Tommy Jiang任命為澳洲國際高爾夫球協會主席。《悉尼晨鋒報》報導稱,Tommy Jiang被認為有中國共產黨的支持。//
我還查到這間德鴻國際,在去年12月5日新疆開設分部搞招聘,未知是否涉及關押維人的集中營,僅稱發展一帶一路。現在,澳洲政府已加入剿共,民間亦需要大家造勢,還請大家繼續出手,以香港合縱國際。
作者
以下為寄送澳洲議員陳情書範本:
Date
Your Name
Your Address
Your Suburb State Postcode
Name of MP
Office Address
Office Suburb State Postcode
Dear Sir/Madam
I am a constituent of your electorate. As an Australian and Hong Konger, I am writing to you as I hold grave concerns over the rapidly deteriorating conditions in Hong Kong.
Since the start of June, millions of Hong Konger have marched on the street and conducted largely peaceful demonstrations on many occasions to voice their opposition to the proposed The Fugitive Offenders and Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Legislation (Amendment) Bill 2019 (known simply as the Extradition Bill) by the Hong Kong Government, which would establish an official extradition mechanism between Hong Kong and China for the first time in history.
The bill has been criticized by the Hong Kong Bar Association as “a step backward” and failing to offer sufficient protections for the accused. The majority of Hong Kong people are in uproar as they harbor deep mistrust towards the Chinese judicial system known for its corruption, disregard for procedural justice, and towing of the official party line.
Oblivious to the depth of animosity, Carrie Lam, the Chief Executive, and the Hong Kong Government ignored the protestors’ demands and ordered the Hong Kong Police Force (HKPF) to violently crackdown on the protestors. This is what led to the stunning and horrifying footages of police brutality — indiscriminate use of tear gas in crowded residential areas, aiming rubber bullets at the protestors’ face, violently shoving journalists who are just doing their jobs, and arresting seemingly innocent bystanders based on the colour of their clothing or age. To date, over 1200 people have been arrested with many denied the right to be accompanied by their lawyer for unreasonable period of time and subjected to questionable negotiation tactics during their detention.
As the legislative and executive arm of the Hong Kong government show its true allegiance to China and its willingness to sacrifice human rights over economic growth, the people of Hong Kong desperately need assistance from the international community.
What is happening in Hong Kong is of critical importance to Australia. There are currently 100,000 Australian dual citizens currently living in the city. Regardless of their political opinion on the ongoing situation, their safety is at risk due to the disproportionately excessive force and indiscriminate arrests that are being deployed by the HKPF to suppress the protest.
Hong Kong’s instability will negatively impact on Australia’s economy. Hong Kong is one of Australia’s most important trading partner and home to many Australian companies’ regional headquarter in Asia. It also acts as the middleman for many transactions between Chinese and Australian businesses.
The relationship between Hong Kong and Australia are intricate and mutually beneficial. Given the dire situation in Hong Kong, I would like you to consider to following measures to protect the people of Hong Kong, which would ultimately benefit Australia:
1.Introduce the International Human Rights and Corruption (Magnitsky Sanctions) Bill to the parliament. The previous attempt lapsed at the dissolution of parliament at April 11, 2019. The bill is based on precedents from the United States and the United Kingdom and it would give powers to relevant ministers to make Australia a safer place that values universal liberal values.
2.Include human rights protection clauses in the final ratified version of the Free Trade Agreement between Australia and Hong Kong.
3.Consider offering special permanent protection for people from Hong Kong who currently resides or studies in Australia. Many Hong Kongers are highly educated and value western liberal values. This group would be a fine addition to Australia.
4.Vet all visa and immigration applications from Hong Kong and China more thoroughly for the necessity of protecting the integrity of Australia’s national security as some applicants could have active contributed or complicit in the violation of human rights as part of the police force, HKSAR Government, or private companies (for example, Cathay Pacific’s management, which is terminating the contract of staffs whom have expressed sympathy or support towards the protest movement). Recent clashes on university campuses over the Hong Kong protests have also demonstrated that some foreign students neither understand nor value some basic rights we Australians cherish.
I appreciate your time and I look forward to hearing back from you about your position on my proposals.
Yours sincerely,
Your name
同時也有10000部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル,也在其Youtube影片中提到,...
「procedural writing」的推薦目錄:
- 關於procedural writing 在 作者 Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於procedural writing 在 作者 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於procedural writing 在 Alexander Wang 王梓沅英文 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於procedural writing 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於procedural writing 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於procedural writing 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於procedural writing 在 44 Procedural Writing ideas - Pinterest 的評價
procedural writing 在 作者 Facebook 的最佳解答
我來開戰線,你們來掠陣,今次呼召澳洲的香港朋友。
感謝澳洲的手足幫手,招數一早備好,惟暫擱至今有兩個原因:一是避過美國《HKHRDA》聽證會的風頭,以免相沖;二是觀察莫里森訪華盛頓的動向。
澳洲不算太反中,中共滲透的議題近年才漸漸冒起。有錢使得鬼推磨,紅色資本投放巨額的政治獻金,又用微信紅包在地區籠絡選票,制華的議程自然被層層攔阻。
不過,全球抗共乃大勢所趨,莫里森一邊左右蓬源,一邊悄悄地築起防線。澳洲支持南海航行自由,又在太平洋大灑投資,抗衡一帶一路插旗。莫里森亦進一步向美國靠攏,宣布投資NASA的火星計劃,亦公開呼籲中國遵守貿易規則。此外,近日當上議員的香港移民廖嬋娥也捲入通華的調查風波,加上愛國的小粉紅在鬧市示威助攻,可見制華議程已成氣候,只待大家再推一把。
其實,澳洲也曾經審議類似美國《Magnitsky Act》的法案,名叫International Human Rights and Corruption (Magnitsky Sanctions) Bill,可惜在四月胎死腹中。現在正是好時機,促請澳洲的國會議員再度提案,與美國的《HKHRDA》並駕齊驅,將中國和香港的人權犯一網打盡。以下就是請願信的範本,大家可以填上你當區的國會議員和自己的名字,列印出來以郵寄方式寄送他們的辦公室,促請他們納入議程,讓澳洲議會加入捍衛人權的抗共行列。
須知道,無數的中港貪官污吏在澳洲都有大量資產,炒高了當地樓價,令民怨沸騰。法案有震懾力,有民意支持,亦可引蛇出洞——任何衝出來反對立法的政治勢力,必難脫通敵的嫌疑。現在,萬事俱備,只欠大家踴躍推動,希望各位幫香港人分享出去,支持澳洲人維護本地利益及國際道義。
作者
======
Date
Your Name
Your Address
Your Suburb State Postcode
Name of MP
Office Address
Office Suburb State Postcode
Dear Sir/Madam
I am a constituent of your electorate. As an Australian and Hong Konger, I am writing to you as I hold grave concerns over the rapidly deteriorating conditions in Hong Kong.
Since the start of June, millions of Hong Konger have marched on the street and conducted largely peaceful demonstrations on many occasions to voice their opposition to the proposed The Fugitive Offenders and Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Legislation (Amendment) Bill 2019 (known simply as the Extradition Bill) by the Hong Kong Government, which would establish an official extradition mechanism between Hong Kong and China for the first time in history.
The bill has been criticized by the Hong Kong Bar Association as “a step backward” and failing to offer sufficient protections for the accused. The majority of Hong Kong people are in uproar as they harbor deep mistrust towards the Chinese judicial system known for its corruption, disregard for procedural justice, and towing of the official party line.
Oblivious to the depth of animosity, Carrie Lam, the Chief Executive, and the Hong Kong Government ignored the protestors’ demands and ordered the Hong Kong Police Force (HKPF) to violently crackdown on the protestors. This is what led to the stunning and horrifying footages of police brutality — indiscriminate use of tear gas in crowded residential areas, aiming rubber bullets at the protestors’ face, violently shoving journalists who are just doing their jobs, and arresting seemingly innocent bystanders based on the colour of their clothing or age. To date, over 1200 people have been arrested with many denied the right to be accompanied by their lawyer for unreasonable period of time and subjected to questionable negotiation tactics during their detention.
As the legislative and executive arm of the Hong Kong government show its true allegiance to China and its willingness to sacrifice human rights over economic growth, the people of Hong Kong desperately need assistance from the international community.
What is happening in Hong Kong is of critical importance to Australia. There are currently 100,000 Australian dual citizens currently living in the city. Regardless of their political opinion on the ongoing situation, their safety is at risk due to the disproportionately excessive force and indiscriminate arrests that are being deployed by the HKPF to suppress the protest.
Hong Kong’s instability will negatively impact on Australia’s economy. Hong Kong is one of Australia’s most important trading partner and home to many Australian companies’ regional headquarter in Asia. It also acts as the middleman for many transactions between Chinese and Australian businesses.
The relationship between Hong Kong and Australia are intricate and mutually beneficial. Given the dire situation in Hong Kong, I would like you to consider to following measures to protect the people of Hong Kong, which would ultimately benefit Australia:
1.Introduce the International Human Rights and Corruption (Magnitsky Sanctions) Bill to the parliament. The previous attempt lapsed at the dissolution of parliament at April 11, 2019. The bill is based on precedents from the United States and the United Kingdom and it would give powers to relevant ministers to make Australia a safer place that values universal liberal values.
2.Include human rights protection clauses in the final ratified version of the Free Trade Agreement between Australia and Hong Kong.
3.Consider offering special permanent protection for people from Hong Kong who currently resides or studies in Australia. Many Hong Kongers are highly educated and value western liberal values. This group would be a fine addition to Australia.
4.Vet all visa and immigration applications from Hong Kong and China more thoroughly for the necessity of protecting the integrity of Australia’s national security as some applicants could have active contributed or complicit in the violation of human rights as part of the police force, HKSAR Government, or private companies (for example, Cathay Pacific’s management, which is terminating the contract of staffs whom have expressed sympathy or support towards the protest movement). Recent clashes on university campuses over the Hong Kong protests have also demonstrated that some foreign students neither understand nor value some basic rights we Australians cherish.
I appreciate your time and I look forward to hearing back from you about your position on my proposals.
Yours sincerely,
Your name
======
澳港聯Australia-Hong Kong Link已開了Senate Petition,早在推動Magnitsky-style Sanction,並成功接洽綠黨領袖Di Natale,將於10月將Petition舉上參院,奈何未夠多人簽署,懇請大家幫手推動:
https://www.change.org/p/the-senate-of-australia-impose-sanctions-on-persons-found-to-be-suppressing-human-rights-in-hong-kong-df999fe5-3d9f-434b-8f58-d0840619a046
procedural writing 在 Alexander Wang 王梓沅英文 Facebook 的最佳解答
★ 幫助學術寫作和 GRE AWA 寫作最有效的閱讀材料之一是? ★
不是經濟學人、不是時代雜誌、不是科學美國人、更不是國家地理雜誌(適合增進閱讀),而是________。
不時有台灣的碩士和博士生內信給我,如果想在academic writing上面作進修,要怎麼樣進修最好。同樣的,很多自修GRE的學生,喜歡去PTT網路爬文,看要怎麼準備AWA最好。
我常常跟我以前和現在的GRE學生說,當然,寫作要進步,首先
你一定要找一個寫作比你好很多的人幫你改(你的目標如果是AWA 4分,建議找AWA 5分到5.5分的人批改),不被批改過不可能靠頭腦意會進步 (這跟寫作能力很大部分屬於 procedural knowledge有關, as opposed to declarative knowledge)。
得到Feedback後,拿出一個筆記本,紀錄、比較、分析、記憶原句跟批改後的差異。但除了上述藉由output 獲得 feedback的方法之外,一定要有大量有「質量」的input,讓學生去體會學術寫作的「口吻」。英文每一種類型 (genre) 的寫作都會附帶一種口吻,而經濟學人 (The Economist)、時代雜誌 (TIME)只適合用來培養閱讀難文的習慣、記憶單字,其實並不是增進AWA或學術寫作的好題材,因為他們都屬於「新聞性」報導。尤其是TIME,寫作有時過度fictional,不是練習AWA/學術寫作的好文。
而之所以很多學生對於學術寫作有畏懼,或是覺得自己AWA拿到3.5-4就了不起了,出自於沒有看過「適合」的學術寫作文,而沒看到適合的材料,看再多也是無用。
我在這邊推薦要準備GRE的學生和想要增進學術寫作的學生「Foreign Affairs」這本雜誌(書局買得到)。
曾經有一位在Georgetown University念外交的友人跟我形容過這本期刊是國際關係 (International Relations) 領域的「bible」。
雖然叫"Foreign Affair",其實內容不只講外交。今年年初的一期,則用很多面向探討了"entrepreneurship" ,而最近這期則用了很多的篇幅分析「機器人」所帶來的影響,而下一期用「多面向」在分析Barack Obama的外交政策。而Foreign Affairs 的筆者幾乎全是大學教授(不是資深記者),這樣的口吻,和背後的邏輯,才是比較像ETS要考察的。
我有很多學生,不管原先底子好不好,都在跟我讀過Foreign Affairs後,GRE AWA從裸考2/2.5 分第二次進步到 3.5/4分,甚至是4.5分。是實際可行,大家可試試看。
★ 王梓沅老師在11月份會開設「GRE實力集訓營」,有興趣的同學歡迎內信詢問 (上一梯招生5天內即額滿,有興趣的同學請提早詢問)。
procedural writing 在 44 Procedural Writing ideas - Pinterest 的推薦與評價
Mar 25, 2012 - Explore mrobesondegagne's board "Procedural Writing", followed by 110 people on Pinterest. See more ideas about procedural writing, ... ... <看更多>