一個大企業難以迴避的地緣新政治 -- #丁學文
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
【陳鳳馨 #財經起床號】每週三早上八點 #一週國際經濟趨勢 老朋友丁學文為我們帶來最新一期的《經濟學人》及國際經濟趨勢!歡迎 #收聽廣播 #收看直播 >> https://youtu.be/dqbQn0lDeFI
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
📌《經濟學人》The new geopolitics of global business 談大企業即將面臨的政治新情勢
📌《倫敦金融時報》G7 set to strike deal on global corporate taxation 全球最低稅負 G7 達成共識
📌《經濟學人》Someone has to foot the bill for empty offices 談疫情過後的商業房地產逆風
📌《經濟學人》Serving a higher purpose 談中國股權投資產業大轉彎
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
#陳鳳馨 #TheEconomist #經濟學人 #一周國際經濟趨勢 #News98 #九八新聞台 #台灣全民廣播電台
同時也有12部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過15萬的網紅豐富,也在其Youtube影片中提到,主持人:陳鳳馨 來賓:丁學文 主題:一週國際經濟趨勢 📌《經濟學人》The new geopolitics of global business 談大企業即將面臨的政治新情勢 📌《倫敦金融時報》G7 set to strike deal on global corporate taxation 全球...
「strike someone」的推薦目錄:
- 關於strike someone 在 News98 官方粉絲團 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於strike someone 在 Mordeth13 Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於strike someone 在 黃之鋒 Joshua Wong Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於strike someone 在 豐富 Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於strike someone 在 陳嘉 CHANKA Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於strike someone 在 毛恩 Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於strike someone 在 Idiom: strike someone as sth. - 看電影學英文 - Facebook 的評價
- 關於strike someone 在 Community Guidelines strike basics - YouTube Help - Google ... 的評價
- 關於strike someone 在 strike someone as中文的評價和優惠,YOUTUBE和商品老實說 ... 的評價
- 關於strike someone 在 10 Things to Know About YouTube Copyright Rules - dummies 的評價
- 關於strike someone 在 YouTube updates channel strike system with one-time ... 的評價
- 關於strike someone 在 Counting strikes | Transparency Center - Facebook 的評價
strike someone 在 Mordeth13 Facebook 的最佳貼文
Jenna Cody :
Is Taiwan a real China?
No, and with the exception of a few intervening decades - here’s the part that’ll surprise you - it never has been.
This’ll blow your mind too: that it never has been doesn’t matter.
So let’s start with what doesn’t actually matter.
Until the 1600s, Taiwan was indigenous. Indigenous Taiwanese are not Chinese, they’re Austronesian. Then it was a Dutch colony (note: I do not say “it was Dutch”, I say it was a Dutch colony). Then it was taken over by Ming loyalists at the end of the Ming dynasty (the Ming loyalists were breakaways, not a part of the new Qing court. Any overlap in Ming rule and Ming loyalist conquest of Taiwan was so brief as to be inconsequential).
Only then, in the late 1600s, was it taken over by the Chinese (Qing). But here’s the thing, it was more like a colony of the Qing, treated as - to use Emma Teng’s wording in Taiwan’s Imagined Geography - a barrier or barricade keeping the ‘real’ Qing China safe. In fact, the Qing didn’t even want Taiwan at first, the emperor called it “a ball of mud beyond the pale of civilization”. Prior to that, and to a great extent at that time, there was no concept on the part of China that Taiwan was Chinese, even though Chinese immigrants began moving to Taiwan under Dutch colonial rule (mostly encouraged by the Dutch, to work as laborers). When the Spanish landed in the north of Taiwan, it was the Dutch, not the Chinese, who kicked them out.
Under Qing colonial rule - and yes, I am choosing my words carefully - China only controlled the Western half of Taiwan. They didn’t even have maps for the eastern half. That’s how uninterested in it they were. I can’t say that the Qing controlled “Taiwan”, they only had power over part of it.
Note that the Qing were Manchu, which at the time of their conquest had not been a part of China: China itself essentially became a Manchu imperial holding, and Taiwan did as well, once they were convinced it was not a “ball of mud” but actually worth taking. Taiwan was not treated the same way as the rest of “Qing China”, and was not administered as a province until (I believe) 1887. So that’s around 200 years of Taiwan being a colony of the Qing.
What happened in the late 19th century to change China’s mind? Japan. A Japanese ship was shipwrecked in eastern Taiwan in the 1870s, and the crew was killed by hostile indigenous people in what is known as the Mudan Incident. A Japanese emissary mission went to China to inquire about what could be done, only to be told that China had no control there and if they went to eastern Taiwan, they did so at their own peril. China had not intended to imply that Taiwan wasn’t theirs, but they did. Japan - and other foreign powers, as France also attempted an invasion - were showing an interest in Taiwan, so China decided to cement its claim, started mapping the entire island, and made it a province.
So, I suppose for a decade or so Taiwan was a part of China. A China that no longer exists.
It remained a province until 1895, when it was ceded to Japan after the (first) Sino-Japanese War. Before that could happen, Taiwan declared itself a Republic, although it was essentially a Qing puppet state (though the history here is interesting - correspondence at the time indicates that the leaders of this ‘Republic of Taiwan’ considered themselves Chinese, and the tiger flag hints at this as well. However, the constitution was a very republican document, not something you’d expect to see in Qing-era China.) That lasted for less than a year, when the Japanese took it by force.
This is important for two reasons - the first is that some interpretations of IR theory state that when a colonial holding is released, it should revert to the state it was in before it was taken as a colony. In this case, that would actually be The Republic of Taiwan, not Qing-era China. Secondly, it puts to rest all notions that there was no Taiwan autonomy movement prior to 1947.
In any case, it would be impossible to revert to its previous state, as the government that controlled it - the Qing empire - no longer exists. The current government of China - the PRC - has never controlled it.
After the Japanese colonial era, there is a whole web of treaties and agreements that do not satisfactorily settle the status of Taiwan. None of them actually do so - those which explicitly state that Taiwan is to be given to the Republic of China (such as the Cairo declaration) are non-binding. Those that are binding do not settle the status of Taiwan (neither the treaty of San Francisco nor the Treaty of Taipei definitively say that Taiwan is a part of China, or even which China it is - the Treaty of Taipei sets out what nationality the Taiwanese are to be considered, but that doesn’t determine territorial claims). Treaty-wise, the status of Taiwan is “undetermined”.
Under more modern interpretations, what a state needs to be a state is…lessee…a contiguous territory, a government, a military, a currency…maybe I’m forgetting something, but Taiwan has all of it. For all intents and purposes it is independent already.
In fact, in the time when all of these agreements were made, the Allied powers weren’t as sure as you might have learned about what to do with Taiwan. They weren’t a big fan of Chiang Kai-shek, didn’t want it to go Communist, and discussed an Allied trusteeship (which would have led to independence) or backing local autonomy movements (which did exist). That it became what it did - “the ROC” but not China - was an accident (as Hsiao-ting Lin lays out in Accidental State).
In fact, the KMT knew this, and at the time the foreign minister (George Yeh) stated something to the effect that they were aware they were ‘squatters’ in Taiwan.
Since then, it’s true that the ROC claims to be the rightful government of Taiwan, however, that hardly matters when considering the future of Taiwan simply because they have no choice. To divest themselves of all such claims (and, presumably, change their name) would be considered by the PRC to be a declaration of formal independence. So that they have not done so is not a sign that they wish to retain the claim, merely that they wish to avoid a war.
It’s also true that most Taiwanese are ethnically “Han” (alongside indigenous and Hakka, although Hakka are, according to many, technically Han…but I don’t think that’s relevant here). But biology is not destiny: what ethnicity someone is shouldn’t determine what government they must be ruled by.
Through all of this, the Taiwanese have evolved their own culture, identity and sense of history. They are diverse in a way unique to Taiwan, having been a part of Austronesian and later Hoklo trade routes through Southeast Asia for millenia. Now, one in five (I’ve heard one in four, actually) Taiwanese children has a foreign parent. The Taiwanese language (which is not Mandarin - that’s a KMT transplant language forced on Taiwanese) is gaining popularity as people discover their history. Visiting Taiwan and China, it is clear where the cultural differences are, not least in terms of civic engagement. This morning, a group of legislators were removed after a weekend-long pro-labor hunger strike in front of the presidential palace. They were not arrested and will not be. Right now, a group of pro-labor protesters is lying down on the tracks at Taipei Main Station to protest the new labor law amendments.
This would never be allowed in China, but Taiwanese take it as a fiercely-guarded basic right.
*
Now, as I said, none of this matters.
What matters is self-determination. If you believe in democracy, you believe that every state (and Taiwan does fit the definition of a state) that wants to be democratic - that already is democratic and wishes to remain that way - has the right to self-determination. In fact, every nation does. You cannot be pro-democracy and also believe that it is acceptable to deprive people of this right, especially if they already have it.
Taiwan is already a democracy. That means it has the right to determine its own future. Period.
Even under the ROC, Taiwan was not allowed to determine its future. The KMT just arrived from China and claimed it. The Taiwanese were never asked if they consented. What do we call it when a foreign government arrives in land they had not previously governed and declares itself the legitimate governing power of that land without the consent of the local people? We call that colonialism.
Under this definition, the ROC can also be said to be a colonial power in Taiwan. They forced Mandarin - previously not a language native to Taiwan - onto the people, taught Chinese history, geography and culture, and insisted that the Taiwanese learn they were Chinese - not Taiwanese (and certainly not Japanese). This was forced on them. It was not chosen. Some, for awhile, swallowed it. Many didn’t. The independence movement only grew, and truly blossomed after democratization - something the Taiwanese fought for and won, not something handed to them by the KMT.
So what matters is what the Taiwanese want, not what the ROC is forced to claim. I cannot stress this enough - if you do not believe Taiwan has the right to this, you do not believe in democracy.
And poll after poll shows it: Taiwanese identify more as Taiwanese than Chinese (those who identify as both primarily identify as Taiwanese, just as I identify as American and Armenian, but primarily as American. Armenian is merely my ethnicity). They overwhelmingly support not unifying with China. The vast majority who support the status quo support one that leads to eventual de jure independence, not unification. The status quo is not - and cannot be - an endgame (if only because China has declared so, but also because it is untenable). Less than 10% want unification. Only a small number (a very small minority) would countenance unification in the future…even if China were to democratize.
The issue isn’t the incompatibility of the systems - it’s that the Taiwanese fundamentally do not see themselves as Chinese.
A change in China’s system won’t change that. It’s not an ethnic nationalism - there is no ethnic argument for Taiwan (or any nation - didn’t we learn in the 20th century what ethnicity-based nation-building leads to? Nothing good). It’s not a jingoistic or xenophobic nationalism - Taiwanese know that to be dangerous. It’s a nationalism based on shared identity, culture, history and civics. The healthiest kind of nationalism there is. Taiwan exists because the Taiwanese identify with it. Period.
There are debates about how long the status quo should go on, and what we should risk to insist on formal recognition. However, the question of whether or not to be Taiwan, not China…
…well, that’s already settled.
The Taiwanese have spoken and they are not Chinese.
Whatever y’all think about that doesn’t matter. That’s what they want, and if you believe in self-determination you will respect it.
If you don’t, good luck with your authoritarian nonsense, but Taiwan wants nothing to do with it.
strike someone 在 黃之鋒 Joshua Wong Facebook 的最讚貼文
【Joshua Wong speaking to the Italian Senate】#意大利國會研討會演說 —— 呼籲世界在大學保衛戰一週年後與香港人站在同一陣線
中文、意大利文演說全文:https://www.patreon.com/posts/44167118
感謝開創未來基金會(Fondazione Farefuturo)邀請,讓我透過視像方式在意大利國會裡舉辦的研討會發言,呼籲世界繼續關注香港,與香港人站在同一陣線。
意大利作為絕無僅有參與一帶一路發展的國家,理應對中共打壓有更全面的理解,如今正值大學保衛戰一週年,以致大搜捕的時刻,當打壓更為嚴峻,香港更需要世界與我們同行。
為了讓各地朋友也能更了解香港狀況,我已在Patreon發佈當天演說的中文、英文和意大利文發言稿,盼望在如此困難的時勢裡,繼續讓世界知道我們未曾心息的反抗意志。
【The Value of Freedom: Burning Questions for Hong Kongers】
Good morning. I have the privilege today to share some of my thoughts and reflections about freedom, after taking part in social activism for eight years in Hong Kong. A movement calling for the withdrawal of the extradition law starting from last year had escalated into a demand for democracy and freedom. This city used to be prestigious for being the world’s most liberal economy, but now the infamous authoritarian government took away our freedom to election, freedom of assembly, freedom of expression and ideas.
Sometimes, we cannot avoid questioning the cause we are fighting for, the value of freedom. Despite a rather bleak prospect, why do we have to continue in this struggle? Why do we have to cherish freedom? What can we do to safeguard freedom at home and stay alert to attacks on freedom? In answering these questions, I hope to walk through three episodes in the previous year.
Turning to 2020, protests are not seen as frequently as they used to be on the media lens, partly because of the pandemic, but more importantly for the authoritarian rule. While the world is busy fighting the pandemic, our government took advantage of the virus to exert a tighter grip over our freedom. Putting the emergency laws in place, public assemblies in Hong Kong were banned. Most recently, a rally to support press freedom organized by journalists was also forbidden. While many people may ask if it is the end of street activism, ahead of us in the fight for freedom is another battleground: the court and the prison.
Freedom Fighters in Courtrooms and in Jail
Part of the huge cost incurred in the fight for freedom and democracy in Hong Kong is the increasing judicial casualties. As of today, more than 10 thousand people have been arrested since the movement broke out, more than a hundred of them are already locked up in prison. Among the 2,300 protestors who are prosecuted, 700 of them may be sentenced up to ten years for rioting charges.
Putting these figures into context, I wish to tell you what life is like, as a youngster in today’s Hong Kong. I was humbled by a lot of younger protestors and students whose exceptional maturity are demonstrated in courtrooms and in prison. What is thought to be normal university life is completely out of the question because very likely the neighbour next door or the roommate who cooked you lunch today will be thrown to jail on the next.
I do prison visits a few times a month to talk to activists who are facing criminal charges or serving sentences for their involvement in the movement. It is not just a routine of my political work, but it becomes my life as an activist. Since the movement, prison visits has also become the daily lives of many families.
But it is always an unpleasant experience passing through the iron gates one after one to enter the visitors’ room, speaking to someone who is deprived of liberty, for a selflessly noble cause. As an activist serving three brief jail terms, I understand that the banality of the four walls is not the most difficult to endure in jail. What is more unbearable is the control of thought and ideas in every single part of our daily routine enforced by the prison system. It will diminish your ability to think critically and the worst of it will persuade you to give up on what you are fighting for, if you have not prepared it well. Three years ago when I wrote on the first page of prison letters, which later turned into a publication called the ‘Unfree Speech’, I was alarmed at the environment of the prison cell. Those letters were written in a state in which freedom was deprived of and in which censorship was obvious. It brings us to question ourselves: other than physical constraints like prison bars, what makes us continue in the fight for freedom and democracy?
Mutual Support to activists behind-the-scene
The support for this movement is undiminished over these 17 months. There are many beautiful parts in the movement that continue to revitalise the ways we contribute to this city, instead of making money on our own in the so-called global financial centre. In particular, it is the fraternity, the mutual assistance among protestors that I cherished the most.
As more protestors are arrested, people offer help and assistance wholeheartedly -- we sit in court hearings even if we don’t know each other, and do frequent prison visits and write letters to protesters in detention. In major festivals and holidays, people gathered outside the prison to chant slogans so that they won’t feel alone and disconnected. This is the most touching part to me for I also experienced life in jail.
The cohesion, the connection and bonding among protestors are the cornerstone to the movement. At the same time, these virtues gave so much empowerment to the mass public who might not be able to fight bravely in the escalating protests. These scenes are not able to be captured by cameras, but I’m sure it is some of the most important parts of Hong Kong’s movement that I hope the world will remember.
I believe this mutual support transcends nationality or territory because the value of freedom does not alter in different places. More recently, Twelve Hongkong activists, all involved in the movement last year, were kidnapped by China’s coastal guard when fleeing to Taiwan for political refugee in late-August. All of them are now detained secretly in China, with the youngest aged only 16. We suspect they are under torture during detention and we call for help on the international level, putting up #SAVE12 campaign on twitter. In fact, how surprising it is to see people all over the world standing with the dozen detained protestors for the same cause. I’m moved by activists in Italy, who barely knew these Hong Kong activists, even took part in a hunger strike last month calling for immediate release of them. This form of interconnectivity keeps us in spirit and to continue our struggle to freedom and democracy.
Understanding Value of freedom in the university battle
A year ago on this day, Hong Kong was embroiled in burning clashes as the police besieged the Polytechnic University. It was a day we will not forget and this wound is still bleeding in the hearts of many Hong Kongers. A journalist stationed in the university at that time once told me that being at the scene could only remind him of the Tiananmen Square Massacre 31 years ago in Beijing. There was basically no exit except going for the dangerous sewage drains.
That day, thousands of people, old or young, flocked to districts close to the university before dawn, trying to rescue protestors trapped inside the campus. The reinforcements faced grave danger too, for police raided every corner of the small streets and alleys, arresting a lot of them. Among the 800+ arrested on a single day, 213 people were charged with rioting. For sure these people know there will be repercussions. It is the conscience driving them to take to the streets regardless of the danger, the conscience that we should stand up to brutality and authoritarianism, and ultimately to fight for freedoms that are guaranteed in our constitution. As my dear friend, Brian Leung once said, ‘’Hong Kong Belongs to Everyone Who Shares Its Pain’’. I believe the value of freedom is exemplified through our compassion to whom we love, so much that we are willing to sacrifice the freedom of our own.
Defending freedom behind the bars
No doubt there is a terrible price to pay in standing up to the Beijing and Hong Kong government. But after serving a few brief jail sentences and facing the continuing threat of harassment, I learnt to cherish the freedom I have for now, and I shall devote every bit what I have to strive for the freedom of those who have been ruthlessly denied.
The three episodes I shared with you today -- the courtroom, visiting prisoners and the battle of university continue to remind me of the fact that the fight for freedom has not ended yet. In the coming months, I will be facing a maximum of 5 years in jail for unauthorized assembly and up to one ridiculous year for wearing a mask in protest. But prison bars would never stop me from activism and thinking critically.
I only wish that during my absence, you can continue to stand with the people of Hong Kong, by following closely to the development, no matter the ill-fated election, the large-scale arrest under National Security Law or the twelve activists in China. To defy the greatest human rights abusers is the essential way to restore democracy of our generation, and the generation following us.
.................
💪小額支持我的獨家分析及文章:https://bit.ly/joshuawonghk
╭────────────────╮
╞🌐https://twitter.com/joshuawongcf
╞📷https://www.instagram.com/joshua1013
╞📧joshua@joshuawongcf.com
╞💬https://t.me/joshuawonghk
╰────────────────╯
strike someone 在 豐富 Youtube 的最佳解答
主持人:陳鳳馨
來賓:丁學文
主題:一週國際經濟趨勢
📌《經濟學人》The new geopolitics of global business 談大企業即將面臨的政治新情勢
📌《倫敦金融時報》G7 set to strike deal on global corporate taxation 全球最低稅負 G7 達成共識
📌《經濟學人》Someone has to foot the bill for empty offices 談疫情過後的商業房地產逆風
📌《經濟學人》Serving a higher purpose 談中國股權投資產業大轉彎
節目時間:週一至週五 07:00-09:00am
本集播出日期:2021.06.09
#陳鳳馨 #TheEconomist #一週國際經濟趨勢
🔔 圖片取自:The Economist
https://www.economist.com/weeklyedition/2021-06-05
📣 更多 #財經起床號 專題影音:https://bit.ly/2QvBR55
🔍 馨天地
Apple Podcast:https://apple.co/3uVbXdQ
KKBOX:https://bit.ly/3bezcYP
Spotify:https://spoti.fi/3beL7pj
-----
訂閱【豐富】YouTube頻道:https://www.youtube.com/c/豐富
按讚【豐富】FB:https://www.facebook.com/RicherChannel
▍九八新聞台@大台北地區 FM98.1
▍官網:http://www.news98.com.tw
▍粉絲團:https://www.facebook.com/News98
▍線上收聽:https://pse.is/R5W29
▍APP下載
• APP Store:https://news98.page.link/apps
• Google Play:https://news98.page.link/play
▍YouTube頻道:https://www.youtube.com/user/News98radio
▍Podcast
• Himalaya:https://www.himalaya.com/news98channel
• Apple Podcast:https://goo.gl/Y8dd5F
• SoundCloud:https://soundcloud.com/news98

strike someone 在 陳嘉 CHANKA Youtube 的最佳貼文
Tribute to the dead, the missing and more importantly, a letter to the awakened ones.
We had a lot of dates printed in our heart, may I use one of them that’s got one more meaning in it.
At some point to some people 911 was the end. Rest of us survived. And as time went by, some of us passed away and here we are, keep on living day by day again.
A sincere thank you to those who strike off shackles to the past, just to let us live for a better future.
“Cry, cry out loud.
I don’t need to be the one who makes you smile.
Fly, fly to someone I can’t shout.
When you’re about to fall,
I will keep my feet on the ground.”
To the awakened fellows. Not everyone’s got a clear mind to lead them where to go and what to do. Don’t be normal. Don’t be limited. Just be yourself. We will always support each other. Till the day we die.
- CHANKA ?
-
Written by CHANKA
Arranged by CHANKA, MAEL, Hin, Dean
Recorded by Nichung
Mixed by MAEL
Mastered by Lok Chan
-
#CHANKA #陳嘉 #Reminiscence
-
Now available on:
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3hjYDYO
Apple Music: https://apple.co/32kYTCt
KKBOX: https://kkbox.fm/uSeWTe
MusicOne: https://bit.ly/2FmBNT8
JOOX: https://bit.ly/2F9O79x
TIDAL Music: https://bit.ly/3bRhaub
-
CHANKA 陳嘉:
www.instagram.com/wander.chanka
www.facebook.com/wander.chanka
wanderchanka@gmail.com
-
Have a listen of some of my other works :
"Silence" : https://youtu.be/1Hkk7l4zk9k
"Young" : https://youtu.be/kolrKYxvvf8
"Ocean" : https://youtu.be/GOTdDrC1G-E
-

strike someone 在 毛恩 Youtube 的精選貼文
詞Lyrics:毛恩Morpheus
曲Composer:毛恩Morpheus
編曲Beat Arrangement :證介
製作Producer:阿吉A JI
錄音Recording Engineer : 阿吉A JI
混音Mixing:阿吉A JI
/
人都是自私的產物,都會做出對自己對好的決定
你可以選擇在谷底沉淪,不斷輪迴
或選擇放下過去,變成更好的自己。
/
Its not a fairytale but true story in life
feels like nightmare corrupt me a hundred times
destiny is brutal no matter how I tried
whispers from the devil interferes my mind
she’s the redemption the antidote just arrived
Heart beat was taken didn’t even realize
Give me love the best present of all time
Bring me courage to face the fear deep inside
Things changed without awareness unexpected
Losing faith no doubt dramatic got abandoned
all assumes ain't no truth don’t know how to do
Damn I’m screwed no more clue difficult to choose I
Can’t read between the lines may be foolish or blind
hard to see through what’s behind this made me terrified
after all the pain its all in vain
I loved u once but nothing remained
There is no more turning back Pearl harbor under attack
Now its time to fight it back no more questions need to ask
Better watch out every step its gonna end up bloody
Hand down something before death missile launcher is ready
I’m drown its dark and still fallin’
the world is in slow motion
light it up flames on you can feel my surge
Strike out enemy down killin like this purge
Its dawn here comes a new legend risin’
Setting up a revolution
You’ll be getting a taste of your own medicine.
Revenge is never too late for all that u have done
Same surroundings different feelings is confusing me
keep on lying she starts crying saying sorry please
Hands tied in this combat relationship is complex
u got hurt from ur ex and choose me to hurt next
Frustration and compassion I’m stuck inside the middle
struggle in my self-conscious let me make it more simple
My girl's been playing games make sure she’s gonna pay for it
I Gotta move and make moves its time I buy my ticket
Bounce back from depression from all bad moods
looking forward to the future make dreams come true
Its Now or never cover the scars with new tattoos
Rebirth comes after the darkness we passed through
Grinding all my life building up my own business
Not even scared of height watch you all hater speechless
show no mercy bitch im sorry there will be no-where safe
I’ll be watchin can’t stop laughin u dig ur own grave
lion is waken new king comin can’t be tamed crowds all insane
Im a monster getting higher lips on fire I’m spitting flame
Bad decision how dare u messin with a beast broke down the cage
In position my gun is aiming pull the trigger blow up ur face
Im drown its dark and I’m still fallin
the world is in slow motion
light it up flames on you can feel my surge
Strike out enemy down killin like this purge
Its dawn here comes a new legend risin’
Setting up a revolution
You’ll be getting a taste of your own medicine.
Revenge is never too late for all that u have done
one day when u try to keep someone close
this curse shows and leave u on your own
u are not innocent
but a player with prayer hands till the end
/
Instagram
毛恩: https://www.instagram.com/mao_en/
A JI: https://www.instagram.com/_19960429/
#trap#hiphop#infinitecycle

strike someone 在 Community Guidelines strike basics - YouTube Help - Google ... 的推薦與評價
Community Guidelines strike basics. This article is about Community Guidelines strikes. If you're looking for info about copyright strikes, which are different ... ... <看更多>
strike someone 在 10 Things to Know About YouTube Copyright Rules - dummies 的推薦與評價
It's still a breach that can earn a strike and a block of the video. If you use someone else's work in your video without that person's ... ... <看更多>
strike someone 在 Idiom: strike someone as sth. - 看電影學英文 - Facebook 的推薦與評價
... <看更多>