Previous Video
●How to download Hyper-rom for S3
○ https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Kw6tSIHl3Dg
Description
The objective of this technique is to provide a way to link to remote long descriptions in technologies that do not have a long description feature built directly into them (e.g., longdesc) or where the feature is known to not be supported.
With this technique, the long description is provided in another location than the non-text content. This could be at another location within the same URI or at another URI. A link to that long description is provided that is immediately adjacent to the non-text content. The link can be immediately before or after the non-text content. If the description is located along with other text then put "End of description" at the end so that they know when to stop reading and return to the main content. If a "Back" button will not take the person back to the point from which they jumped, then a link back to the non-text content location is provided.
This technique was commonly used in HTML before 'longdesc' was added to the specification. In HTML it was called a D-Link because it was usually implemented by putting a D next to images and using the D as a link to the long description. This technique is not technology specific and can be used in any technology that supports links.
ExamplesExample 1: Bar chart
There is a bar chart on a Web page showing the sales for the top three salespeople.
The short text alternative says "October sales chart for top three salespeople."
Immediately after the non-text content is a small image denoting a long description. The alternate text for the image is "Long description of chart". The image links to the bottom of the page where there is a section titled "Description of charts on this page". The link points to this specific description: "Sales for October show Mary leading with 400 units. Mike follows closely with 389. Chris rounds out our top 3 with sales of 350. [end of description]"
Example 2: Bar chart - in non-HTML technology where user agent "back" is not supported for security reasons.
There is a bar chart on a Web page showing the sales for the top three salespeople.
The short text alternative says "October sales chart for top three salespeople."
![post-title](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DhkhbDUkmi4/hqdefault.jpg)
technique vs technology 在 [問題] 想請問"技術"應該翻成technique還是te … - 精華區translator 的推薦與評價
※ 引述《dodoL (Because We Care)》之銘言:
: "技術"應該怎麼翻呢?
: Ex: 把某樣技術應用到一項產品上
: technique跟technology都可以翻成技術
: 但還是有區別吧?
: 依我的理解 technique是指比較精確的技術,技巧
: technology 是比較廣泛的指技術, 科技
: 對嗎? @@
: 但是我還是不知道 像我上面舉的那個例句 應該要用哪個字...
: 請大家指點一下 謝謝~
基本上,我會認為在這個時候使用 technology 會比較好,尤其是在探討牽涉到可申請
專利的科學、工業性生產技術時,應優先適用 technology。technique 比較適合用來
指稱因為「經驗」所造就出來的獨特作法,適合用來指稱手法、技法(可用來形容藝術
家、工匠或其他表演者),甚至可以用來指稱運用 technology 的巧妙。
例如:
the Wi-Fi technology(科學、工業性技術)
the brilliant technique of that pianist/artisan(手法、技法)
a special technique of utilizing Wi-Fi technology(運用 technology 的巧妙)
至於 know-how,則有可能指 technology ,也可能是指 technique。通常暗示著與營
業秘密有關。 technology 部份例如尚未對外公開的工業性技術,在 technique 部份
,例如沖泡奶茶時的茶奶比例等,都可以說是 know-how。不過以 know-how 這個詞最
初出現的場合來看,其意義是比較偏向 technique:因經驗的累積而「know(知道)
how(如何)」做某件事。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.218.0.48
... <看更多>