對於人權的尊重是將美國、台灣和其他國際民主大家庭連結在一起的 #共享價值。今天早上,美國國務院及美國財政部的政府專家與台灣立法院人權促進會,共同討論美國如何利用《全球馬格尼茨基人權問責法》捍衛人權、打擊貪腐,並在全球促進問責制和良善治理。美國國會於2016年12月通過此法,讓美國政府能夠針對全球各地嚴重侵犯人權或從事貪腐的人實施制裁和簽證限制。歐盟、英國和加拿大也陸續制定相關法令。藉由與志同道合的國際夥伴攜手合作,我們將確保我們的司法管轄權境內不會成為貪腐人士和人權侵害者的避風港。#humanrights
Respect for human rights is one of the #sharedvalues that bind the United States and Taiwan with the international family of democracies. This morning, U.S. government experts from the State Department and Treasury Department shared their experience with the Taiwan Parliamentary Human Rights Commission on how the United States has used the Magnitsky Act to defend human rights, combat corruption, and promote accountability and good governance around the world. The United States Congress passed the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act in December 2016 to allow the U.S. government to impose sanctions designations and visa restrictions on persons who committed serious human rights abuse or engaged in corruption across the globe. Other countries have since enacted similar laws, including the European Union, the UK, and Canada. Together with our international partners who share these values, we will ensure that corrupt actors and human rights abusers will have no refuge within our jurisdictions.
同時也有10000部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル,也在其Youtube影片中提到,...
「uk government department」的推薦目錄:
- 關於uk government department 在 美國在台協會 AIT Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於uk government department 在 李怡 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於uk government department 在 Goodbye HK, Hello UK Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於uk government department 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於uk government department 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於uk government department 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於uk government department 在 UK government - Facebook 的評價
- 關於uk government department 在 Building step by step journeys into GOV.UK - YouTube 的評價
uk government department 在 李怡 Facebook 的最佳解答
It is too late to “chicken out” now (Lee Yee)
Pro-establishment camp keeps spreading news about postponement of the Legislative Council (LegCo) elections. Following Tam Yiuchung, Tong Kawah said the government could put the elections on hold for 14 days as many times as necessary. Tanya Chan pointed out that the government seems to intend extending the current LegCo session in view of the absence of gazetted announcement of when it will end.
Communist China and Hong Kong originally planned to threaten Hong Kong people with the National Security Law, then browbeat candidates into signing a confirmation in support of the law that is to be used as evidence to disqualify (DQ) the opposition faction from the elections. By doing so, they are to get the elections in the bag. However, to everyone’s surprise, the National Security Law has stirred up worldwide backlash, putting China under siege. Meanwhile, Hong Kong have not overawed, as evidenced by their will to resist demonstrated in the primary elections of pro-democracy camp, in which a large number of young pro-resistance hopefuls were elected. So long as the Carrie Lam regime massively disqualifies candidates, it will certainly give rise to an even fiercer global backlash. Providing that the anti-China measures escalate, neither will China be able to stay authoritative in front of its compatriots by showing the white feather, nor will it be courageous enough to wage a head-to-head battle.
It seems that the DQ strategy has been relinquished. Swift and decisive enforcement of the National Security Law was seen merely on the first day of its implementation. Since then, it has rarely been cited for law enforcement. Even though Communist China and Hong Kong stubbornly refuses to admit a fault, they are inarguably aware of having been a bit “cheeky”. Ditching the DQ strategy, they may suffer a crushing defeat in the elections. What should they do now? To counterplot, the epidemic could be a convenient pretext for putting off the elections.
Nonetheless, while the plight in which China is under siege by the world has gotten in shape, it is too late to “chicken out” . On July 21, Pompeo met with Nathan Law, an activist from Hong Kong. Law said to him that disqualifying candidates from elections amounts to a severe challenge to the values of democracy, calling on the international community to respond to it with a tough stance. So, even if the elections are put off, the U.S.’s sanctions will not be delayed.
On the same day, a fire outbreak broke the news to the world that the U.S. ordered closure of the Consulate General of the People's Republic of China(PRC) in Houston. The U.S. State Department said: The consulate was directed to close in order to protect American intellectual property and Americans' private information. China has been engaging in espionage and infiltration for decades, and in recent years, it has gone deeper and more extensive.
U.S. senator Marco Rubio said the Consulate General of the PRC in Houston is not a diplomatic unit , but the central point of China’s enormous operation network of espionage and infiltration, which should have been closed. Holding a concurrent post of the Deputy Chairman of the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee, Rubio has access to the classified information of the U.S. Congress.
Gordon G. Chang, a prominent American academic, said the U.S. should direct the Consulate General of the PRC in New York to close as well for it is the core operation center of the CCP in eastern America.
Trump said yesterday there is a possibility that other consulates of China are ordered to close as well.
China indicated that “necessary reactions would be made”. According to Reuters, China is considering closing the Consulate General of the U.S. in Wuhan for retaliation. Global Times Editor in Chief Hu Xijin said “80%” of the Reuters’ coverage is “wrong”, being of the opinion that Beijing would highly likely adopt a tit-for-tat strategy to close the Consulate General of the United States in Hong Kong, which is as equally important as the one in Beijing, or expel half of the personnel from Hong Kong.
China had better ditch the rhetoric and do it fast. Although “80%” of Reuters’ coverage may be “wrong”, I’m afraid what is wrong is China dare not even close the Consulate General of the U.S. in Wuhan. The response yesterday of the spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the PRC to closure of the Consulate General of the PRC in Houston was also empty rhetoric. And its reaction to the UK offering BNO holders right of abode in the UK was: “China will consider denying BNO passports as valid travel documents.” It is not only empty rhetoric, but literally moonshine.
Earlier on, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the PRC Wang Yi said in a forum held by China-U.S. Think Tanks that the Sino-U.S. relations should “activate and open conduits for dialogues” and “get back to the right track”. On July 21, being asked about the Sino-U.S. relations on CCTV, Cui Tiankai, the Ambassador of the PRC in the U.S., remarked: “It is necessary to activate and open conduits for dialogues. Now that there isn’t even a conversation, it should be deemed abnormal”. It has suggested that China craves reopening a dialogue with the U.S.. However, Trump openly said he did not want to talk to Xi Jinping. The U.S. has already turned a deaf ear to China.
The Hong Kong version of National Security Law certainly plays a major role in contributing to the current predicament. The law has shown to the international community China would not live up to any promise. When the basic trust is gone, the basis for a dialogue is gone. Action is way more down-to-earth than rhetoric!
uk government department 在 Goodbye HK, Hello UK Facebook 的精選貼文
英國終於同澳洲加拿大一齊幫美帝開路喇
(外交辭令表面好斯文,意思其實好嚴厲)
「乜乜政策法」同「一張廢紙」呢兩條美帝內部事務嘅惡法,要求國務卿Pompeo要交報告比國會,考慮寶安縣裡面嗰個直轄市嘅獨立關稅地位,同埋有無違反人權,如果有就好似委內瑞拉總統同啲官咁制裁。Pompeo响5月6號已經話睇埋人地個會講咩先,所以延遲出個報告。而且有啲嘢並唔能夠由Pompeo說了算,關於中英聯合聲明呢份過時失效嘅文件,始終都要廢國呢個簽署國出聲話違反咗,先可以開爐落油,加鹽加醋嘅。好喇,既然對方呢個星期酬賓周送埋子彈,英國終於出手,仲好刻意同兩個受欺凌嘅英聯邦苦主澳洲同加拿大出聯合外交聲明,交比美帝起鑊上菜。
大家睇下原文先,嗱,外交辭嘅嘢,緊係唔會好似怨婦網絡X我咁狠勁啦,但係含意已經好清楚同嚴厲,睇黎都好足夠Pompeo交功課比美帝國會,如果用廣東話應該或者可能係咁意思。
//We are deeply concerned at proposals for introducing legislation related to national security in Hong Kong.//
(嗰條國安法嘅提案嘅內容,令我地感覺極之不安喎。)
//The legally binding Joint Declaration, signed by China and the UK, sets out that Hong Kong will have a high degree of autonomy. It also provides that rights and freedoms, including those of the person, of the press, of assembly, of association and others, will be ensured by law in Hong Kong, and that the provisions of the two UN covenants on human rights (the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights) shall remain in force.//
(喂,唔該搞清楚同記住,中英聯合聲明當年係中國同英國簽咗,仲注咗上去聯合國,仍然有法律約束力嘅文件黎㗎!唔好失憶,份嘢裡面係包括咗兩份聯合國約章關乎人權、公民社會、經濟、政治權利嘅國際核心價值嘅條文。)
嗱,封晒位喇,如果話聯合聲明係過時失效嘅話,無問題㗎,咁嗰兩條聯合國約章敢唔敢話無效,公然違反承諾先?咁就唔只關直轄市嘅事喇喎,即係承諾咗嘅國際公約都可以反口啦,係咪咁?(唔好剩係做,有膽回應話係就得㗎喇!Come on!來來來!)
//Making such a law on Hong Kong’s behalf without the direct participation of its people, legislature or judiciary would clearly undermine the principle of ‘One Country, Two Systems’, under which Hong Kong is guaranteed a high degree of autonomy.//
(跳過晒人民直接參與、立法或者司法程序,自把自為幫人地立法?咁好明顯係破壞直轄市高度自治嘅「一國兩制」原則啦。)
One Country No(so99y)係Two System係聯合聲明嘅內容係咪?Clearly undermine係咪即係違反咗喇?唔知笑面虎睇唔睇得明呢?
#個波交返比美帝先
#打呔都可以係爛仔
分享英國外交必備咒語:
「怨婦」「無期望」「信唔過」「聽住先」召喚誅邪!臨兵鬬者,皆陣列前行。凡九字,常當密祝之,無所不辟。要道不煩,此之謂也。《抱朴子·內篇卷十七·登涉》
BTW,喂喂喂,呢份嘢係怨婦們聲稱係「奶X狗」Dominic Raab出㗎,唔該出黎講兩句評論下吖?
原文:
UK Foreign Office:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/joint-statement-from-the-uk-australia-and-canada-on-hong-kong
Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade
https://www.dfat.gov.au/news/media-release/joint-statement-hong-kong-national-security-legislation
Global Affairs Canada
https://www.canada.ca/en/global-affairs/news/2020/05/joint-statement-by-canada-australia-and-united-kingdom-on-hong-kong-national-security-legislation.html
*********************************
支持Patreon係本Page嘅支柱:
https://www.patreon.com/goodbyehkhellouk
YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/c/GoodbyeHKHelloUK
英國移民生活網 重要舊文重溫
www.goodbyehkhellouk.com
*********************************
uk government department 在 Building step by step journeys into GOV.UK - YouTube 的推薦與評價
![影片讀取中](/images/youtube.png)
In May 2019, the Government Digital Service (GDS) won a D&AD Award for Service Design, for their step by step navigation work. ... <看更多>
uk government department 在 UK government - Facebook 的推薦與評價
Official Facebook page for the UK government - highlighting government information and support.... ... Department of Health and Social Care - DHSC. ... <看更多>