星期三,立法會,約定您!
比較澳門與香港的發展
網上報名 Online Form: https://goo.gl/J1UojW
透視澳門城市發展
An analysis on urban development in Macau
主題︰透視澳門城市發展
日期︰2017年4月19日(三)
時間︰晚上7至9時
地點︰立法會綜合大樓502室
費用︰全免
對象︰專業人士、區議員、公眾
網上報名︰https://goo.gl/J1UojW
嘉賓︰林芷芸小姐(凱達(澳門)有限公司董事)
個人簡介︰
林芷芸小姐畢業於香港大學,獲得建築學士和碩士學位,之後她到倫敦大學深造,獲得法律學士,並在香港註冊成為建築師。
自澳門賭博行業壟斷時代結束,她開始關心澳門的發展項目,目睹澳門巨大的變化。她曾參與大型遊戲和混合土地用途開發、住宅、商業、文物遺產保護等發展項目,涉及總建築面積超過四千萬平方尺。由規劃提交、設計、招標和施工程序,她也有深度的參與。
主要內容:
澳門為全球其中一個人口稠密的地方,每平方公里容納27,000人。過去30年,土地面積增加一倍,但土地稀缺仍是澳門遇到的問題之一。不過,澳門出現一個奇怪的現象,很多土地位於市中心的優良位置,卻沒有得到充份利用。澳門政府和發展商就在這個問題上互相推搪。林小姐過往曾接觸不少受影響的發展項目,將綜合探討現象成因和影響。
(English Version)
Topic: An analysis on urban development in Macau
Date: April 19, 2017 (Wed)
Time: 7:00- 8:30 p.m.
Venue: Legco Complex Room 502
Fee: Free-of-charge
Targets: professionals, district councilors and public
Online Registration: https://goo.gl/J1UojW
Speakers: Ms. Joanne Lam (Director, Aedas)
Biography:
Ms. Joanne Lam graduated from the University of Hong Kong with a BA (Architectural Studies) and Master of Architecture (Distinction). She also obtained a Bachelor of Laws from the University of London, and is a registered architect in Hong Kong.
She focused in Macau projects since the end of the gambling industry monopoly and witnessed the gigantic change in Macau since. Her projects include large scale gaming and mix-use developments, residential developments, commercial developments and heritage conservation projects. She was involved in various stages of them including planning submission, design, tender and construction stage. Total GFA of these Macau projects is over 40 million square feet.
Main theme:
With around 27,000 people per square kilometers, Macau is the most densely populated country/dependency in the world. Although it doubled its land area in the past 30 years, scarcity of land is still one of the biggest concerns in Macau. However, there is a strange scene in Macau, a lot of lands, even in the city center, remain undeveloped. Government and developers blame each other to this unique problem in Macau. With experience working for projects affected, Joanne will explore the reasons for this happening and the problems generated.
研討會發表以中文為主輔以英文
The language of this Seminar will be in Cantonese with supplements in English
查詢 Inquiry
電話 Phone: 3614 6166
電郵 Email: ranaeso@edwardyiu.org (Ms. So)
網頁 Website: https://www.edwardyiu.org/
同時也有10000部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル,也在其Youtube影片中提到,...
「urban planning problems」的推薦目錄:
- 關於urban planning problems 在 姚松炎 Edward Yiu Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於urban planning problems 在 急急Touch Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於urban planning problems 在 本土研究社 Liber Research Community Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於urban planning problems 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於urban planning problems 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於urban planning problems 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳貼文
urban planning problems 在 急急Touch Facebook 的最佳解答
聽完Becky同佳佳介紹本地農田而家咩環境~
快啲去入信啦!
(URGENT!!!)
SAVE HK FARMLAND !
SAVE HK COUNTRYSIDE !
SAY "NO!!" TO NENT PLAN !
http://goo.gl/PAXOqA
**城規會已開始第二階段諮詢,請在5月7日之前,填寫此反對表格,一起入信城規,叫停東北,保家護農!!
(無論之前有冇填過,都可以填!)
http://goo.gl/PAXOqA
-----------
(URGENT!!!)
SAVE HK FARMLAND !
SAVE HK COUNTRYSIDE !
SAY "NO!!" TO NENT PLAN !
http://goo.gl/PAXOqA
Send your submission to Town Planning Board against the Northeast New Territories Development Plan!
The TPB is currently conducting public consultation on the NENT (Kwu Tung North & Fanling North*) Development Plan! (deadline : 20 feb)
How to do it ?
You may:
1. Email to TPB directly at tpbpd@pland.gov.hk
2. Simply sign up this form and we will do it for you !
http://goo.gl/PAXOqA
3. (the easiest : just fb inbox us your name+email address !) 馬寶寶社區農場 Mapopo Community Farm
we will send your representation as below :
--------------------
To: Town Planning Board (tpbpd@pland.gov.hk)
Representation Relating to Draft Plan
Plan No.: S/KTN/1 and S/FLN/1
I, a Hong Kong citizen, strongly object to the Northeast New Territories (Kwu Tung North & Fanling North) Development Plan (“the Plan”). The reasons are as follows:
1. The Plan is not necessary at all. It will only create huge social and ecological problems to Hong Kong.
What the government should do is to make better use of existing vacant government lands and to rectify its housing and land policies, which heavily favour developers now.
2. The Plan will destroy the way of life and community network of existing residents.
Nearly 10 thousand residents’ homes will be destroyed, which will be the largest eviction in Hong Kong in the last 30 years.
3. The plan will cause a domino effect of more destruction of rural New Territories.
With the government’s acquiescence, developers have been hoarding and pre-emptively destroying farmland throughout the pre-planning stages of the Plan. Such government-business collusion has led to Hong Kong’s precious natural resources being monopolised, and only large corporations in Hong Kong and Mainland China are the biggest winners.
4. Green belt will be reduced and ecological buffer zone destroyed.
The intended development area is the only remaining green belt between Shenzhen and Hong Kong. The Kwu Tung, Sheung Shui and Fanling plain, which is connected to the Long Yuen Wetland, is an important line of defence against the intrusion of urbanisation. From a planning perspective, this remaining natural habitat should be preserved.
I urge the government to:
1. withdraw the NENT Development Plan, maintain the current land use, and strengthen the protection for green belt and agricultural land.
2. protect and develop local industries and agriculture, maintain the rural way of life, enhance diversification of local industries and promote mutual growth of rural and urban areas, for a truly sustainable development.
urban planning problems 在 本土研究社 Liber Research Community Facebook 的最佳解答
See how our research demystifies the land politics of the northern New Territories
本組向HK Magazine專題提供了反對新界北淪陷的重要理據,而新界東北正正就是撐住新界融合戰的橋頭堡!
--
[cover story] What Will Happen to the New Territories?
http://hk.asia-city.com/…/…/what-will-happen-new-territories
The government’s little-publicized plans for developing the northeastern New Territories are much bigger than it would have you believe—under the current plans, huge tracts of green land will be turned to concrete. Grace Tsoi takes a closer look at the many complex issues and concerns surrounding the project.
On September 2, while secondary school students were hunger striking at Tamar, a smaller-scale but equally vociferous protest was being staged. Several hundred villagers from Kwu Tung North, Fanling North, Ping Che and Ta Kwu Ling also staked out the government offices. They chanted slogans protesting against demolition and removal—their homes are slated to be destroyed, according to the government’s plan to develop the northeastern New Territories.
The development plan is not a new one. As early as 1998, former Chief Executive Tung Chee-hwa floated the idea to develop Kwu Tung North, Fanling North, Ping Che and Ta Kwu Leng into three new development areas (NDAs). However, the plan was halted due to a slower-than-expected population expansion in 2003. Then in 2007, Donald Tsang restarted the Hong Kong 2030 Planning Vision and Strategy scheme, and the Northeastern New Territories were again slated to be developed. The three NDAs will total 787 hectares, of which 533 hectares will be built upon. The consultation was done in the dark, and the majority of the public only learnt of the development plan at the last stage of the consultation. Originally the consultation was set to conclude at the end of August, but due to staunch opposition, the government has extended the deadline until the end of September. Here, we line out the many problems and shortcomings of the government’s plans.
Can It Satisfy Housing Demand?
The government backs up the development plan by stating that more homes will be built in the northeast New Territories—an appealing idea in the wake of rocketing house prices. Around 54,000 homes will be built, with 40 percent of the flats set aside for public housing. During her tenure as Secretary for Development, Carrie Lam said the ratio of public housing should be kept at less than 50 percent in order to avoid a repeat of the disastrous Tin Shui Wai new town in Yuen Long. “The problem with Tin Shui Wai is not that there is too much public housing. It is because of the monopolies [for example, the community is served only be The Link and Li Ka-shing’s shopping malls and there are very few independent vendors] and insufficient jobs for the working class. Even hawking is prohibited,” says Chan Kim-ching, a researcher from Local Research Community, a think-tank focusing on urban planning. On the other hand, the project’s 21,600 public housing flats, which will be made available by the year 2022, don’t even come close to satisfying the government’s target of building 15,000 public housing homes per year. We have to ask—is getting rid of all this precious green space worth it? On the private housing side, low-density homes will be built. However, it is questionable whether these flats will be affordable for the majority of the Hong Kong public—Chan worries that they will be snapped up by mainland buyers instead of satisfying local housing needs.
Overestimating Population Growth
In order to justify the project, the government has, once again, cited population growth in its push to build more housing. A government press release states: “According to the latest population projections, there will be an increase of about 1.4 million people in the coming 30 years. There is still a strong demand for land for housing and economic development.” However, the Census and Statistics Department has a track record of overestimating Hong Kong’s population growth. In 2002, the department predicted that Hong Kong’s population would hit 7.53 million by 2011. But today, Hong Kong’s population is 7.14 million—way off government estimates. The department itself has also lowered its population estimates. In 2004, it predicted that Hong Kong’s population would surge to 8.72 million by mid-2031. But latest predictions stand at 8.47 million by mid-2041. So if the government’s predictions are not accurate and consistent, how can it justify such a large-scale development?
Non-indigenous Villagers Lose Out
It is estimated that more than 10,000 villagers will be affected by the plan, and that more than 10 villages will be demolished. Almost all of the villages that are under threat are largely inhabited by non-indigenous villagers. Non-indigenous villagers migrated to Hong Kong after World War II. They farmed in the New Territories and built their homes near their fields. However, they are not landowners because land in the New Territories belongs to indigenous villagers. So even though the non-indigenous villagers have lived in the area for decades, according to authorities, they have no rights to the land. “The most ridiculous thing is, even though non-indigenous villagers have been living there for 50 or 60 years, their houses are still classified as squatter huts, a temporary form of housing. The authorities don’t recognize their housing rights… Non-indigenous villagers are easy targets of bullying because their rights are not protected by law,” says Chan.
Although it is the non-indigenous villagers who will be most affected by the development plans, no one sought to gain their input. In fact, the first and second phases of the consultation, which were conducted in 2009 and 2010, did not actively engage them at all. “The villagers of Ping Che did not know about the plan before—they only learned of the plan when they were invited to a poon choi banquet hosted by gleeful indigenous villagers. Some of the elderly villagers attended, and they were only told at the feast that the celebration was because the government would claim the land for development. They only learned that they would have to move at the banquet,” Chan says.
Unlike urban renewal projects, the government has not conducted any studies to investigate how many villagers are going to be affected; neither has it come up with any compensation or resettlement plans for the affected villagers. The only thing the government has done is to carve out a 3.2 hectare parcel of land in Kwu Tung North, where a public housing project will accommodate the non-indigenous villagers.
Meanwhile, indigenous villagers are set to reap huge profits. All the land in the new Territories land is either owned by indigenous villagers or property developers. As the government has allocated $40 billion to buy land, it is certain that indigenous villagers will pocket part of the money. To add insult to injury, while their non-indigenous counterparts face the demolition of homes, the indigenous villages will be kept largely intact. Also, the government has saved land for the future expansion of indigenous villages. Within the three NDAs, around six hectares of land has been set aside for this purpose.
Loss of Farmland
Another inevitable consequence of developing the New Territories is the loss of farmland. A spokesperson of the Planning Department tells HK Magazine that 22 hectares of land under active cultivation will be affected by the development. That figure is significantly lower than estimates by environmental groups, which have come up with the figure of 98 hectares. “The government data refers to the land being farmed currently, but we focus on arable land. When we talk about arable land, it also includes abandoned land which has the potential to be rehabilitated. It is for sure that the government has not included such land in its figure of 22 hectares. From the perspective of agricultural development, abandoned land can be rehabilitated. So why don’t we protect and rehabilitate this land?” says Roy Ng, the Conservancy Association’s senior campaign officer.
Displaced Farmers
The government has pledged to maintain a total of 54 hectares as agricultural zones. However, 37 of these so-called “protected” hectares are found in Long Valley, a well-established and very active farming area. The government plans to relocate many of the farmers who have been displaced by the project to Long Valley, a move that’s bound to cause friction between agriculturalists. “If we move all the affected farmers to Long Valley, it means that some of the farmers [who are already] in Long Valley have to move away,” Ng says. “The agricultural practices of the farmers are very different. In Long Valley, most of the farmers are growing wetland crops. But most farmland in Ping Che and Ta Kwu Ling is not wetland… If we move all these farmers to wetland areas, it may have an adverse impact on the conservation of Long Valley.”
Word on the Street
Villagers are fighting for the right to remain in th eir homes, undisturbed by government intervention. Here’s what they have to say.
I have been living in Ping Che for almost five decades, and all my children were born there. Ping Che is a large village, where thousands of people reside. We only knew that our village would be demolished a few months ago, and we only caught wind of some rumors before. Ping Che is spacious, and we grow produce for ourselves. When we first came to Ping Che, it was a primitive place. We have been renting land from the villagers since then. And Ping Che has become a beautiful village due to our efforts. I don’t want to see our village be destroyed. My children have grown up, and they don’t want to move out either.
Amy, 50s, Ping Che resident
Our family has been living in Kwu Tong for three generations. Two years ago, we found out that our land had to be claimed back [by the government]. The development plan had been formulated for a long time, but the officials never told us about it. We were shocked to learn of the plan, and we think the government has kept the plan in the dark. There are a few hundred villagers, and we all know each other. Even though I am young, I love the rural life a lot. I lived in private buildings in Fanling for more than two years as it was closer to my school. The feeling was very different. In our village, everyone says hi to each other; we even know the name of each dog! [In Fanling], I didn’t know my neighbors, and I didn’t even notice when they moved away. I hope our village will not be demolished because we want to keep our lifestyle. We will continue to fight for our rights.
Hiu Ching, 18, Kwu Tung North resident
I have never joined any protest. This is my first time because the government wants to take away the land from our village. The officials never consulted us, and it seems that we have to comply with every order of the government. There are fruit trees in front of our house, and the trees are 20 to 30 years old. We get all kinds of fruits to eat. Lychee, longan, jackfruit, aloe and melons…you name it. It’s no different from an orchard. When we were kids, we didn’t need to close our doors because we would just go next door to play with other children. A lot of structures are very old, and they are our heritage. We have gotten used to the rural way of living, and it’s difficult for us to adapt to a city life. We don’t want any compensation. There are many elderly people in our village, and they have been living here for decades. For those skeptics who think that we are only demanding more compensation, try to think from our perspectives. We have been living here for decades, and our home will be lost!
Mr. Lee, 30, Kwu Tung North resident
Development By Numbers
An outline of the redevelopment plans by region.
1. Kwu Tong, Fanling North, Ping Che/Tai Koo Leng New Development Areas (NDAs)
Size: 533 hectares.
Progress: Stage 3 of public engagement.
2. Hung Sui Kiu NDA
No outline development plan has been released, but it will be turned into an NDA that caters a population of 160,000. The government will also save land for the development of “Six Industries”—testing and certification, medical services, innovation and technology, cultural and creative industries, environmental industries and education services.
Size: 790 hectares.
Progress: Stage 2 of public engagement to be commenced; in operation by 2024.
3. Lok Ma Chau Loop
Once the property of Shenzhen, the Loop was allocated to Hong Kong after realignment of the Shenzhen river in 1997. The area will be turned into a higher education zone.
Size: About 87 hectares.
Progress: Stage 2 of public engagement completed; in operation by 2020.
4. Liangtang/Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point
Progress: construction will start in 2013; in operation by 2018.
5. Frontier Closed Area (FCA)
Established by the British for strategic reasons, the FCA will be downsized and land will be released for development. Due to the area’s history, it hasn’t been touched by any development.
Use: A country park will be designated near Robin’s Nest. Other areas are zoned as green belt and for agricultural uses. But a comprehensive development zone and residential areas are designated for Hung Lung Hang. Hoo Hok Wai, another ecologically sensitive area that occupies 240 hectares, is zoned under “other specific uses,” which also means that further development is possible.
Size: 2,400 hectares.
Progress: 740 hectares of FCA has already been opened up in the first phase.
6. Southern Yuen Long
The government is planning to build housing—both private and public—in the area.
Size: About 200 hectares.
Progress: The Development Bureau will conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), planning and engineering study at the same time. In operation by 2015.
7. Sha Lo Tung
It has been earmarked as one of the 12 sites of ecological importance. The site is an important habitat for butterflies and fireflies. Under the government’s Public-Private Partnership scheme, the developer wants to build a columbarium with 60,000 niches, while establishing an ecological reserve.
Size: The columbarium is set to be four hectares in size.
Progress: The EIA has already been completed, but the Advisory Council on the Environment halted the decision.
8. Nam Shen Wai
Another spot for the Public-Private Partnership scheme. The developer is planning to build 1,600 housing units, including 600 Home Ownership Scheme flats, in the southern part. It also wants to build elderly care homes to increase the social care elements. The Northern part of Nam Shen Wai and Lut Chau will be designated as a conservation area. Green groups oppose the plan because parts of the wetland will be lost.
Size: 121 hectares.
Progress: The EIA has been completed. The application will be submitted to the Town Planning Board in September.
9. Fung Lok Wai
The area is also classified as one of 12 areas with significant ecological value. Five percent of the land will accommodate luxury homes, while 95 percent of land will be turned into a conservation area. Fung Lok Wai is very close to Mai Po.
Size: 4.1 hectares (development area).
Progress: Awaiting a decision from the Town Planning Board.
--
請加入反對新界東北融合計劃專頁:
http://www.facebook.com/defendntnorth
urban planning problems 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的最佳解答
urban planning problems 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的精選貼文
urban planning problems 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳貼文
urban planning problems 在 3 Main Problems Faced in Urban Planning - Your Article Library 的相關結果
3 Main Problems Faced in Urban Planning ; 1. Individual Control or Small Parcels of Land: ; 2. Arbitrary Political Boundaries: ; 3. Irregularity of Environmental ... ... <看更多>
urban planning problems 在 Urban Planning Issues and Solutions - IEREK 的相關結果
Urban planning Issues aims to establish a society with bases and bases in land use to achieve sustainable development and meet the needs of ... ... <看更多>
urban planning problems 在 Issues in urban planning - Appropedia, the sustainability wiki 的相關結果
Issues in urban planning · Urban sprawl & inefficient use of land causes housing affordability problems, transport problems, and uses up a finite ... ... <看更多>