- Chữa đề Writing thật tiếp theo thôi cả nhà ơi - Đề số 10 nhé: Some people think it is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment for people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Bài mẫu:
The state spending on public health has become a widely perpetual concern. Some individuals argue that these already scarce resources should be reserved for the prevention of lifestyle-related illness. In my opinion, the government should focus more on the prevention of illnesses rather than medical treatment.
On the one hand, certain acute diseases, non-preventable regardless of governmental efforts to promote a healthy lifestyle, still need a state budget allocation for medical care. One of the primary duties of the government is to provide publicly funded healthcare to the whole population. Therefore, covering therapeutic and medical costs for those already developing symptoms of acute conditions would be a significant part of that duty, helping mitigate the financial burden associated with those maladies. In other words, a dearth of investment in treatment would be devastating patients’ individual life and wreaking havoc on overall social welfare.
On the other hand, promoting a healthy lifestyle as a prevention strategy is meant to avoid the entire economic burden of chronic diseases, affecting a significant proportion of the population. Those conditions, occurring across different life course stages, share common preventable risk factors relating to unhealthy behaviors, including poor nutrition, inadequate physical activity, and chronic heavy drinking and smoking. If left unchecked, trends in chronic diseases risk factors combined with a growing and aging population will increase the numbers of people living with chronic conditions, later causing the heavy burden of illness in patients, their families, and the community. Therefore, given a scarcity of state budgets for various public services, the government should directly provide information, including health education campaigns, or regulating information, such as limits on advertising and guidelines on food labelings. As a result, positive changes in individual lifestyle would follow, helping them withstand the ravages of time, and saving the state budget for other economically beneficial needs, such as technological investment, education, and infrastructure, rather than spending on treatment.
In conclusion, while allocating its healthcare budget in treatment, the government should promote a healthy lifestyle to avoid preventable chronic diseases due to its economic rationality.
Words: 341
----
Tháng 9 này, cùng IELTS Fighter Find your Fire - thắp đam mê, kệ Covid, học tập nâng cao kiến thức mỗi ngày nha. Các bạn cùng chờ đón cuộc thi Đại sứ IELTS Junior nè, Livestream học tập mỗi tuần và workshop online cho sinh viên siêu thú vị nữa nha. Theo dõi fanpage IELTS Fighter - Chiến binh IELTS để cập nhật thông tin nóng thường xuyên nhé.
同時也有10000部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル,也在其Youtube影片中提到,...
「what is social welfare」的推薦目錄:
- 關於what is social welfare 在 IELTS Fighter - Chiến binh IELTS Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於what is social welfare 在 Ainie Haziqah Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於what is social welfare 在 李怡 Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於what is social welfare 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於what is social welfare 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於what is social welfare 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於what is social welfare 在 What is Social Welfare ? - YouTube 的評價
what is social welfare 在 Ainie Haziqah Facebook 的最讚貼文
ISU BERKENAAN KES KEGANASAN TERHADAP KANAK-KANAK - #JusticeForBella
1. Baru-baru ini kita digemparkan dengan insiden menyayat hati melibatkan seorang kanak-kanak perempuan berusia 13 tahun - Adik Bella yang menghidap Sindrom Down dilaporkan di dera dengan kejam di sebuah kondominium di Wangsa Maju pada 24 Jun.
2. Saya berdukacita apabila tindakan kejam dan tidak masuk akal seperti ini masih berlaku. Melindungi kanak-kanak merupakan tanggungjawab besar apatah lagi melibatkan kanak-kanak istimewa.
3. Dengan hanya mengenakan hukuman yang lebih ketat tidak akan dapat menyelesaikan isu ini. Pihak berwajib dan agensi yang berkaitan mesti berkerjasama dengan satu solusi agar perkara ini tidak berulang. Keganasan melibatkan kanak-kanak mesti dihentikan daripada berlaku. Jika tiada tindakan dilakukan, mangsa akan terus menderita.
4. Masyarakat perlu memainkan peranan untuk mengambil sikap ambil tahu tentang apa yang berlaku di sekeliling mereka. Menjadi tanggungjawab kita semua untuk melaporkan kepada pihak berwajib jika berlaku salah laku melibatkan kanak-kanak. Kerajaan juga telah memperkenalkan talian 'hotline' untuk melaporkan perkara ini seperti Talian Kasih dan Teledera.
Setiap kanak-kanak adalah tanggungjawab kita.
AINIE HAZIQAH
EXCO Srikandi BERSATU Malaysia
Ketua Wanita Muda Negara
___________________________________
PRESS STATEMENT: Violence Against Children - #JusticeForBella
1. The recent horrific abuse case concerning Adik Bella with Down Syndrome at a condominium in Wangsa Maju on June 24th has triggered anger to the public.
2. It baffles and frustrates me to see that cases like this are still happening so rampantly. Caring and safeguarding for a child implies great responsibilities especially special needs children.
3. Stiffer penalties alone will not be able to stop child abuse. It is important for the government and relevant agencies alike to join forces and find solutions that can address the problem fundamentally. We must stop domestic violence from happening at home and at social welfare home/centres. We must no longer stay silent on this matter. The more you stay silent, the victims will continue to suffer in silence longer.
4. It is very important for the public to always be aware of what is going on in their neighbourhoods and report any information on abuse and crimes by contacting the police or head over to any nearby police station. You can also contact Malaysia's child abuse hotline - Talian Kasih and call Teledera to report. Remember, every child matters.
AINIE HAZIQAH
EXCO Srikandi BERSATU Malaysia
Ketua Wanita Muda Negara
what is social welfare 在 李怡 Facebook 的精選貼文
Conservatives and Liberals | Lee Yee
In the 1960s and 1970s, the American Civil Rights movement, the anti-Vietnam war movement, and the European movement were in the rage. At that time I was still young, and saw that in Western ideologies there were the liberals and the radicals. The middle-aged and older people were mostly liberals, and young people were mostly radicals. Nobody called themselves conservative at that time. It was as if there was a consensus that society should reform, that being conservative means not progressive. It was not until 1979 and 1981 when Prime Minister Mrs. Margaret Thatcher and U.S. President Reagan came to power and implemented conservative policies, succeeded, before the British and American politics went back to being traditional. However, the yearning for equality brought about by these civil movements has since become the mainstream driving ideology and consciousness in Western academics and media.
In the United States' two parties, the Republicans are generally considered conservatives, and the Democrats are liberals. Of course, there is mutual influence and infiltration into each and among each other. There are no generally accepted standard definitions for liberalism and conservatism, for they reflect socio-ideological trends and political practices of politicians.
Liberalism basically has four pillars: one, it recognizes that there are unavoidable conflicts of interest and beliefs in society; two, distrust of power; three, that people are progressive, and subjectively promotes the progress of human civilization; four, regardless of people’s ideology, identity, race, gender, or sexual orientation, they should be respected and accepted for their diversity, minorities are tolerated, and equality is pursued.
Conservatism is by no means an antonym to the pursuit of freedom. Both Mrs. Thatcher and Reagan are the most resolute guardians of freedom; conservatism does not deny power, but emphasizes that power must be monitored, checked and balanced.
In terms of welfare policies, liberalism pursues equality, protects minority rights, protects disadvantaged groups, and promotes and enhances social welfare. Since the increase in welfare would come from government spending, therefore there have to be tax increases. It is not like conservatism disregard the disadvantaged groups, but rather, it believes that there can be no true equality except before God and a fair court. It must first recognize the various differences and groups in people, and the pursuit of equality regardless of differences will only create new inequalities. If society eventually moves towards the equal distribution in socialism, people will move towards the path of slavery. Conservatism does not oppose welfare, but rather, it believes that charitable organizations, churches, civic organizations, or foundations should help the weak and helpless in society. The government ought to provide only policy assistance from the side, because if the government is to lead welfare, it will lead to excessive governance and intervention, and the price to pay will be an increase in taxation, leading to inflation. One of the founding spirits of the United States is that everyone is self-reliant. For those with the ability to make their own living to rely on government welfare for a prolonged period will actually make people live a life without self-esteem.
Liberalism seeks equal distribution from anti-discrimination, anti-difference, and equal opportunity, which is a road towards socialism. Conservatism does not seek rapid progress,; it believes that customs, conventions, and continuity should be followed. Ancient customs allow people to live together in harmony; those who destroy customs can destroy beyond what they want to destroy. The Cultural Revolution revolutionized the fate of culture. Conservatives also do not oppose social progress, but progress will not fall from the sky. If certain parts of society are progressing, other parts usually are declining. A healthy society must be both “enduring” and “developing”. For society to sustain endurance for a long time, there must be lasting faith. If that cannot last, the root source of righteousness will collapse.
In order not to interfere with people’s freedom, conservatism advocates small government, deregulation, tax reduction, in an attempt to create an environment conducive to the operation of private enterprises. Before Reagan was elected, both society and the economy were in difficult situations. The Americans hoped that Reagan could save the economy when he came to power, but in his inauguration speech, he said, “Government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem.” Loosening up, reducing taxes, and adopting inaction, Reagan rejuvenated the U.S. economy.
Despite advocating for small governments, successive Republican governments, from Reagan to Bush to Trump, have increased military spending and maintained a strong military power; the Democratic Party’s Obama, on the other hand, wanted to be tolerant of totalitarian countries and cut military spending. Reagan developed a space war plan, and Trump developed the space army, because they believe that neither democracy or totalitarianism is people’s choice between different systems, but between people’s choice or the system imposed upon them by those in power; it is the difference between righteousness and evil, no middle ground, no moral relativism. Goodness must become the strong one, or else evil fascism will encroach, control, and ultimately defeat you.
what is social welfare 在 What is Social Welfare ? - YouTube 的推薦與評價
Check out Social Welfare in the Philippines. Its roles, functions and importance. ... <看更多>