關於 tightening中文 ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

-（中文版本往下滑！）
Introducing a tea tree series of skincare products from a Taiwanese drugstore brand 上山採藥 tsaio!

This series has alcohol ingredients, be aware of that if you’re rosacea. All the bottled products have a refreshing scent!

Let’s introduce them one by one in the order of my skincare routine!
①Tea tree pore tightening toner
I’m not that of a toner gal so I have not much to say more than the scent 😂I do like the scent!

②Tea tree control acne powder toner
This product need to be shaken before use. I only suggest to use it at night for the powders show up after it dries on my skin.

③Tea tree anti-acne treatment lotion
It’s very fluid so I prefer to use cotton pad to apply to my skin. My skin has a moistured look after this product gets into the skin (it takes time). I like it!

④Tea tree control acne gel
Highly recommend this product for it has great outcome on making big acnes go away, more amounts of the product than others (which is 20ml), and a drugstore price! The scent is good and it’s transparent.

More pics👉👉👉

Wish you all a lovely day 🌸
-
今天分享的是台灣品牌 #上山採藥 的茶樹粉痘系列保養品！

全系列都含有酒精，酒糟肌的朋友要注意～罐裝的產品每個都聞起來涼涼的！應該是茶樹的涼感（？）使用上都沒有立即讓我的皮膚感受到刺痛的刺激，偏敏感的肌膚是可以嘗試看看的！

接下來按照我的使用順序一一做介紹！
①茶樹毛孔緊緻收斂水
倒在化妝棉後擦拭全臉，喜歡涼涼的味道的人應該會喜歡這系列的產品～對化妝水沒有特別要求所以讓我們往下一個前進！😂

②茶樹控油調理粉痘水
像資生堂嘉美艷容露一樣雙層的化妝水，有用來調理背部痘痘！可以濕敷，只建議晚間使用，因為使用前搖勻後還是容易有白色粉末殘留在肌膚上～瓶蓋上也會有使用後的殘留物！

③茶樹粉刺速退散調理乳
一開始還困惑於乳液怎麼會跟化妝水有一樣的瓶口，不過使用後就明白了！這是一款流動力較高的乳液，適合直接到在化妝棉上再全臉擦拭，臉上會有適度保濕和水潤的光澤感唷！我蠻喜歡的💕

④茶樹抗痘凝膠
局部用於明顯要冒出大痘痘的凸起上可以解決問題！不過連續幾天使用後的地方容易脫皮唷～味道香香的，也是透明的質地，最喜歡的一點是容量有20ml！CP值超高～之前用過的類似產品都只有15ml～推薦！❤️

感謝品牌提供產品！（要特別提小編的小卡真的特別讓人感動😳很用心的品牌🌸）

更多照片👉👉👉

祝你們有美好的一天🌸

#skincare #antiacne #troubledskin #skincareproducts #toner #lotion #facegel #teatree #teatreeoil #acne #acnetreatment #acneskincare #acnesolution #茶樹 #茶樹精油 #茶樹抗痘 #保養 #痘痘肌 #抗痘 #保養品 #tsaio #植物妝藥家 #茶樹粉痘組 #茶樹粉痘保養專家

【前港督彭定康錄影發言　促香港政府撤回修訂逃犯條例】

「我希望即使在這個最後階段，政府仍然可以退讓，撤回方案，不要再添亂。這修例不需要通過，亦不應該通過，香港應該繼續是一個有法治、有自由的社會，而不應該面對這些令人憂心的引渡修例。」

發言英文紀錄及中文翻譯：

Former Hong Kong Governor Lord Chris Patten video message Transcript

I know that this week in Hong Kong, thousands of people will be making their views clear, demonstrating against the proposals on extradition, which the government has put forward, extradition to China. It’s a proposal, or a set of proposals, which strike a terrible blow - I think - and so, I think to most people in Hong Kong and so does the international community, against the rule of law, against Hong Kong’s stability and security, against Hong Kong’s position as a great international trading hub. And the surprise is that the government in Hong Kong doesn’t seem to understand that. It does make you wonder sometimes who actually runs Hong Kong these days: is it the Hong Kong government or is it the joint liaison office acting on behalf of the communist regime in Beijing?

Why is this important? Well it’s the latest in a number of things that have happened in recent years which have tightened Beijing’s grip on Hong Kong, and which have profoundly worried people. I think for ten or a dozen years after 1997, things in Hong Kong went pretty well. Of course they could have gone better, I’m sorry that Beijing throttled the development of democracy, much against the promises that have been made earlier. But by and large, I think, Hong Kong remained a very free and successful society.

But ever since the regime in Beijing started to roll back Deng Xiaoping’s reforms and the developments that have taken place under Jiang Zemin and Zhu Rongji and Hu Jintao, and Wen Jiabao; ever since then, with the Party taking control over everything, cracking down on dissidents, cracking down on human rights, locking people up, incarcerating them in Xinjiang and so on. Ever since then, we know that Beijing has also been tightening its grip, or trying to, in Hong Kong. And I think that the latest proposals on extradition are an example of that.

Now a lot of very spurious arguments are put forward, it said that the present situation is a “loophole” which needs to be filled up - that’s absolute nonsense. People have known exactly why there shouldn’t be an extradition agreement with China for years, and many of the arguments put for the government’s proposals don’t actually pass the laugh-off-your-seat test. The argument that, well, it’s better to have an extradition treaty than to abduct people illegally from Hong Kong - are people really supposed to believe that?

Except for, but of course, Western democracies in Europe have extradition agreements with China, but they’re in a very different position to the position that Hong Kong is in. The reason why international chambers of commerce, why lawyers, why business around the world, why governments have raised their objections is very simple: because what these proposals do is to remove the firewall between Hong Kong’s rule of law and the idea of law - which prevails in Communist China - an idea of law where there aren’t any independent courts, where the courts and the security services and the party’s rules - which are, sometimes, pretty obscure - are rolled altogether. That’s why we’ve seen recently Canadian citizens that are locked up are taken as if it were hostage against things happening in Canada itself under the rule of law there. So it’s not surprising that people are so worried about what is happening.

I know that when people talk about the particular problem in relation to Taiwan, the leaders of the Hong Kong Bar Association over the last few years, I think a dozen of them, have put forward proposals which show how you could deal with that issue building on the existing common law.

So these proposals are bad for Hong Kong, they - I think - raise all sorts of questions which the government hasn’t even thought through, not least about Hong Kong’s economic importance and economic stability. We know very well that Hong Kong needs to be treated separately in economic and commercial matters from the rest of China. When I was governor a long time ago, I used to travel to Washington fairly regularly to argue the case for treating Hong Kong differently from, say, Shenzhen and Shanghai. But if you appear to be regarding Hong Kong from Beijing as though it was just another China city, then sooner or later, economic governments around the world, businesses around the world, when they’re looking even at things like the Belt and Road Initiative, they’re going to regard Hong Kong as just another part of China, and that would be really bad for the standard of living, for the quality of life in Hong Kong!

Above all, of course, if we go ahead, if the government goes ahead with this extradition agreement, it will cause unnecessary worries and anxieties in Hong Kong. That’s a really bad thing. I hope that even at this late stage, the government will back off and leave well alone. It doesn’t have to happen, it shouldn’t happen, and Hong Kong should carry on as a free society, under the rule of law, without having to worry about this extradition.

前港督彭定康錄影講話翻譯

我知道這星期在香港，成千上萬的人將會到街上遊行表達自己的意見，反對政府所提出將會容許引渡到中國的引渡修例建議。這是一項，或者應該說是一系列我及國際社會認為將會對香港的法治、香港的穩定和社會安全造成很大打擊的建議，它將會嚴重傷害香港作為一個國際貿易中心的地位。令人驚訝的是，香港政府似乎並不理解這一點。這確實令人懷疑這些日子究竟是誰在管治香港：是香港政府還是代表北京共產黨政權的中聯辦？

為甚麼這修例是這麼重要？這是近年來發生的一系列容許北京強行控制香港的事件之一，而這一直以來都讓人深感憂慮。我覺得在1997年之後的十年至十幾年，香港的情況進展尚算順利。當然，是本來可以更好，我很遺憾北京扼殺了香港民主的發展，違背了之前所作出的承諾。但總的來說，香港在那個時候仍然是一個非常自由和成功的社會。

但是，自北京政權開始推翻鄧小平的改革以及在江澤民、朱熔基、胡錦濤和溫家寶時期所推行的發展以後，共產黨控制着一切，打擊持不同政見的人，打擊人權，在新疆把人民關押等等。從那時起，我們就知道北京一直在試圖加緊控制香港。我認為最新的引渡建議就是一個例子。

現在香港政府提出了許多非常虛假的論點，它說目前的情況是展現了一個需要填補的「洞」，這絕對是胡說八道。大家多年來都確切地清楚知道不應該與中國達成引渡協議的原因。而政府提出的許多論點實際上也沒有一個不令你拍案大笑。政府認為制定引渡條約比從香港非法綁架人民更好，你認真覺得人們應該相信這個說法嗎？

當然他們又會說歐洲的西方民主國家與中國已經簽訂了引渡協議，但它們與香港根本處於完全不同的地位。國際商會、律師、商人及各國政府之所以提出反對意見的原因非常簡單：因為這些修例將會摧毀香港法治與中國共產黨的法治概念之間的防火牆。中國的法律觀念不包括任何獨立的法院，並把法院、國安部門以及黨的規則 （黨規則亦有時相當模糊）完全混在一起。這就是為甚麼我們最近看到被關起來的加拿大公民被用為人質，反對加拿大本身在她自己國家的法治下所發生的事情。因此，人們如此擔心這修例所帶來的影響並不奇怪。

我知道當人們都正在談到與台灣有關的問題之際，過去幾年的香港大律師公會領導人，應該是有十幾位，都已經提出意見，說明你如何就着香港現行的普通法來處理這個問題。

這些修例對香港不利，我認為這些修例所引發的疑問是甚至政府都沒有仔細考慮過的，尤其是對香港經濟重要性和經濟穩定性的影響。我們非常清楚在經濟和商業方面是需要把香港與中國其他地區分開對待。很久以前，當我還是港督的時候，我經常前往華盛頓游說對方看待香港的時候要跟對待深圳和上海之類的中國城市有所不同。但是如果以北京的角度看香港，將香港當為另一個普通中國城市，那麼世界各地的政府及企業將會視香港為中國的一部分（而不是特區），就算是看待「一帶一路」之類倡議時亦會是如此。這對香港的生活水平和生活質素都是非常不利的！

當然，最重要的是如果香港政府繼續硬推這些引渡修例，這將會在香港引起不必要的憂慮和焦慮。這些都是非常糟糕的事情。我希望即使在這個最後階段，政府仍然可以退讓，撤回方案，不要再添亂。這修例不需要通過，亦不應該通過，香港應該繼續是一個有法治、有自由的社會，而不應該面對這些令人憂心的引渡修例。

【前港督彭定康錄影發言　促香港政府撤回修訂逃犯條例】

「我希望即使在這個最後階段，政府仍然可以退讓，撤回方案，不要再添亂。這修例不需要通過，亦不應該通過，香港應該繼續是一個有法治、有自由的社會，而不應該面對這些令人憂心的引渡修例。」

發言英文紀錄及中文翻譯：

Former Hong Kong Governor Lord Chris Patten video message Transcript

I know that this week in Hong Kong, thousands of people will be making their views clear, demonstrating against the proposals on extradition, which the government has put forward, extradition to China. It’s a proposal, or a set of proposals, which strike a terrible blow - I think - and so, I think to most people in Hong Kong and so does the international community, against the rule of law, against Hong Kong’s stability and security, against Hong Kong’s position as a great international trading hub. And the surprise is that the government in Hong Kong doesn’t seem to understand that. It does make you wonder sometimes who actually runs Hong Kong these days: is it the Hong Kong government or is it the joint liaison office acting on behalf of the communist regime in Beijing?

Why is this important? Well it’s the latest in a number of things that have happened in recent years which have tightened Beijing’s grip on Hong Kong, and which have profoundly worried people. I think for ten or a dozen years after 1997, things in Hong Kong went pretty well. Of course they could have gone better, I’m sorry that Beijing throttled the development of democracy, much against the promises that have been made earlier. But by and large, I think, Hong Kong remained a very free and successful society.

But ever since the regime in Beijing started to roll back Deng Xiaoping’s reforms and the developments that have taken place under Jiang Zemin and Zhu Rongji and Hu Jintao, and Wen Jiabao; ever since then, with the Party taking control over everything, cracking down on dissidents, cracking down on human rights, locking people up, incarcerating them in Xinjiang and so on. Ever since then, we know that Beijing has also been tightening its grip, or trying to, in Hong Kong. And I think that the latest proposals on extradition are an example of that.

Now a lot of very spurious arguments are put forward, it said that the present situation is a “loophole” which needs to be filled up - that’s absolute nonsense. People have known exactly why there shouldn’t be an extradition agreement with China for years, and many of the arguments put for the government’s proposals don’t actually pass the laugh-off-your-seat test. The argument that, well, it’s better to have an extradition treaty than to abduct people illegally from Hong Kong - are people really supposed to believe that?

Except for, but of course, Western democracies in Europe have extradition agreements with China, but they’re in a very different position to the position that Hong Kong is in. The reason why international chambers of commerce, why lawyers, why business around the world, why governments have raised their objections is very simple: because what these proposals do is to remove the firewall between Hong Kong’s rule of law and the idea of law - which prevails in Communist China - an idea of law where there aren’t any independent courts, where the courts and the security services and the party’s rules - which are, sometimes, pretty obscure - are rolled altogether. That’s why we’ve seen recently Canadian citizens that are locked up are taken as if it were hostage against things happening in Canada itself under the rule of law there. So it’s not surprising that people are so worried about what is happening.

I know that when people talk about the particular problem in relation to Taiwan, the leaders of the Hong Kong Bar Association over the last few years, I think a dozen of them, have put forward proposals which show how you could deal with that issue building on the existing common law.

So these proposals are bad for Hong Kong, they - I think - raise all sorts of questions which the government hasn’t even thought through, not least about Hong Kong’s economic importance and economic stability. We know very well that Hong Kong needs to be treated separately in economic and commercial matters from the rest of China. When I was governor a long time ago, I used to travel to Washington fairly regularly to argue the case for treating Hong Kong differently from, say, Shenzhen and Shanghai. But if you appear to be regarding Hong Kong from Beijing as though it was just another China city, then sooner or later, economic governments around the world, businesses around the world, when they’re looking even at things like the Belt and Road Initiative, they’re going to regard Hong Kong as just another part of China, and that would be really bad for the standard of living, for the quality of life in Hong Kong!

Above all, of course, if we go ahead, if the government goes ahead with this extradition agreement, it will cause unnecessary worries and anxieties in Hong Kong. That’s a really bad thing. I hope that even at this late stage, the government will back off and leave well alone. It doesn’t have to happen, it shouldn’t happen, and Hong Kong should carry on as a free society, under the rule of law, without having to worry about this extradition.

前港督彭定康錄影講話翻譯

我知道這星期在香港，成千上萬的人將會到街上遊行表達自己的意見，反對政府所提出將會容許引渡到中國的引渡修例建議。這是一項，或者應該說是一系列我及國際社會認為將會對香港的法治、香港的穩定和社會安全造成很大打擊的建議，它將會嚴重傷害香港作為一個國際貿易中心的地位。令人驚訝的是，香港政府似乎並不理解這一點。這確實令人懷疑這些日子究竟是誰在管治香港：是香港政府還是代表北京共產黨政權的中聯辦？

為甚麼這修例是這麼重要？這是近年來發生的一系列容許北京強行控制香港的事件之一，而這一直以來都讓人深感憂慮。我覺得在1997年之後的十年至十幾年，香港的情況進展尚算順利。當然，是本來可以更好，我很遺憾北京扼殺了香港民主的發展，違背了之前所作出的承諾。但總的來說，香港在那個時候仍然是一個非常自由和成功的社會。

但是，自北京政權開始推翻鄧小平的改革以及在江澤民、朱熔基、胡錦濤和溫家寶時期所推行的發展以後，共產黨控制着一切，打擊持不同政見的人，打擊人權，在新疆把人民關押等等。從那時起，我們就知道北京一直在試圖加緊控制香港。我認為最新的引渡建議就是一個例子。

現在香港政府提出了許多非常虛假的論點，它說目前的情況是展現了一個需要填補的「洞」，這絕對是胡說八道。大家多年來都確切地清楚知道不應該與中國達成引渡協議的原因。而政府提出的許多論點實際上也沒有一個不令你拍案大笑。政府認為制定引渡條約比從香港非法綁架人民更好，你認真覺得人們應該相信這個說法嗎？

當然他們又會說歐洲的西方民主國家與中國已經簽訂了引渡協議，但它們與香港根本處於完全不同的地位。國際商會、律師、商人及各國政府之所以提出反對意見的原因非常簡單：因為這些修例將會摧毀香港法治與中國共產黨的法治概念之間的防火牆。中國的法律觀念不包括任何獨立的法院，並把法院、國安部門以及黨的規則 （黨規則亦有時相當模糊）完全混在一起。這就是為甚麼我們最近看到被關起來的加拿大公民被用為人質，反對加拿大本身在她自己國家的法治下所發生的事情。因此，人們如此擔心這修例所帶來的影響並不奇怪。

我知道當人們都正在談到與台灣有關的問題之際，過去幾年的香港大律師公會領導人，應該是有十幾位，都已經提出意見，說明你如何就着香港現行的普通法來處理這個問題。

這些修例對香港不利，我認為這些修例所引發的疑問是甚至政府都沒有仔細考慮過的，尤其是對香港經濟重要性和經濟穩定性的影響。我們非常清楚在經濟和商業方面是需要把香港與中國其他地區分開對待。很久以前，當我還是港督的時候，我經常前往華盛頓游說對方看待香港的時候要跟對待深圳和上海之類的中國城市有所不同。但是如果以北京的角度看香港，將香港當為另一個普通中國城市，那麼世界各地的政府及企業將會視香港為中國的一部分（而不是特區），就算是看待「一帶一路」之類倡議時亦會是如此。這對香港的生活水平和生活質素都是非常不利的！

當然，最重要的是如果香港政府繼續硬推這些引渡修例，這將會在香港引起不必要的憂慮和焦慮。這些都是非常糟糕的事情。我希望即使在這個最後階段，政府仍然可以退讓，撤回方案，不要再添亂。這修例不需要通過，亦不應該通過，香港應該繼續是一個有法治、有自由的社會，而不應該面對這些令人憂心的引渡修例。

演出《美少女的謊言》的女星露西·海爾，在 Vogue Taiwan 的「大明星化妝間」分享她現代感好萊塢風美妝造型的例行化妝步驟。這位美國演員使用放在冰箱保鮮的乳清與乳霜保養肌膚，並且展示她用刮痧進行淋巴排放的技巧，以便達成透亮而濕潤的肌膚基底。自己承認熱愛美妝與肌膚保養的她，非常信賴打上多層次的遮瑕膏、大量睫毛膏，也透露了用古銅色化妝品營造日曬光澤感的秘招。露西提醒著我們「如果你不太確定，那就混在一起用」，然後以翼狀的眼線與艷紅色的口紅完成造型，既向她華麗風格的阿嬤致敬，也用一點現代版的新花樣打造出最強的老派好萊塢風妝容。
#露西海爾 #大明星化妝間 #好萊塢

Credits:
CASTING: Nurrrr

Beauty Credits:
Lotion P50 1970, by Biologique Recherche
Banana Bright™ Eye Crème, by Ole Henriksen
Noni Bright Vitamin C Serum, by Kora Organics
Cosmic Glow Oil, by Supernal
Bain Gua Sha, Black/Gold, by Ava Kensington
Cryo Face Lift and Tightening Massager, Black Silver, by Ava Kensington
Sérum Placenta, by Biologique Recherche
Luminous Silk Foundation, 5 & 5.5, by Armani Beauty
Shape Tape™ Concealer, 22N Light Neutral, by Tarte Cosmetics
Radiant Corrector For Eyes, Beige, by Clé de Peau Beauté
Pro Airbrush Concealer Brush, No 57 Sephora Collection, by Sephora
Concealer SPF 25, Beige, by Clé de Peau Beauté
Tinted "Un" Powder, 0-1, by RMS Beauty
Les Beiges Bronzing Cream, by Chanel
Sublimage Mini Kabuki Brush, by Chanel
Show Curl XL Lash Curler for Round Eyes, Sephora Collection by Sephora
EF 2 Brush, by Mario Makeup
Filmstar Bronze & Glow Contour Palette, Light to Medium, by Charlotte Tilbury
Master Mattes™ Eyeshadow Palette, Warm Tan, by Makeup by Mario
All-Day Intense Gel Eyeliner™, Deep Chestnut (140), by Almay
Master Pigment™ Pro Pencil, The Perfect Brown, by Makeup by Mario
Master Mattes™ Brightening Pencil, by Makeup by Mario
Length & Lift Mascara™, Black (030), by Almay
Positive Light Liquid Luminizer, Transcend, by Rare Beauty
Stay Vulnerable Melting Blush, Nearly Mauve, by Rare Beauty
Pro Cream Brow Brush, 68, Sephora Collection, by Sephora
Brow Defining Pencil, DP Brown, by Kelley Baker
Brow Styler™ Brow Mascara, Clear (040), by Almay
Major Headlines - Precision Lip Crayon, That's Why She's Late, by Patrick Ta
Major Headlines - Matte Suede Lipstick, That's Why She's Late, by Patrick Ta

【 其他熱門主題】
讓喜歡的事變生活！Good Job！ ► http://smarturl.it/r7si6s
芭蕾舞者們的血淚史 ► http://smarturl.it/uhot5l
唐綺陽12星座深入剖析 ► http://smarturl.it/in8eqp
美容編輯正芳隨你問 ► http://smarturl.it/zf5840
口音、服裝專家拆解經典電影 ► http://smarturl.it/zcbgmf
---------------------------------------------------------------
【追蹤 VOGUE TAIWAN】
★訂閱VOGUE TAIWAN Youtube：http://smarturl.it/xbtuuy
★VOGUE TAIWAN 官網：http://www.vogue.com.tw/live/
★VOGUE TAIWAN Facebook：https://www.facebook.com/VogueTW/
★VOGUE TAIWAN Instagram：https://www.instagram.com/voguetaiwan/
★VOGUE TAIWAN LINE：https://reurl.cc/V66qNn
★美人會不會 FB社團：http://hyperurl.co/rgfitl
★訂閱GQ TAIWAN Youtube：http://bit.ly/2fBjdcD
★GQ TAIWAN官網：http://www.gq.com.tw/
★GQ TAIWAN粉絲專頁：http://smarturl.it/r9gauv
★GQ TAIWAN Instagram：https://pse.is/JVNES
★GQ TAIWAN LINE：https://pse.is/FX7T4


▷ Make sure you subscribe to my channel and hit the notification bell, so you don’t miss any of my new videos → http://smarturl.it/xbtuuy
--------------------------------------------
※關於時尚，VOGUE說了算！自從1892年第一本VOGUE在美國出版以來，至今已有122年的歷史，始終被時尚專業人士所推崇，因此榮譽為Fashion Bible時尚聖經。
--------------------------------------------
※台灣VOGUE隸屬Condé Nast Interculture Group，相關國外影片皆由國外授權提供給台灣使用，台灣VOGUE秉持服務網友，讓更多中文語系觀眾可以看到國際影片跟中文字幕，所以在此頻道分享給大家，如果喜歡我們的頻道，請訂閱我們，我們將會持續努力帶來更多優質內容。

facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lemonhead.hapi
blog: http://lemonlemonhead.blogspot.hk
instagram: http://instagram.com/lemonlemon_head

﹣﹣﹣﹣﹣﹣﹣﹣﹣﹣﹣拉下有更多資料﹣﹣﹣﹣﹣﹣﹣﹣﹣﹣﹣

今日想同大家分享有關蜂蜜的天然美容方法。
其實蜂蜜是很好的護膚品，
它含有維他命 氨基酸 酶 礦物質及醣，
可以抗氧化 滋潤皮膚之外 還有消炎殺菌的作用。

燕麥美容: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skxznrn18as
蘆薈美容: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mu5hN95JDmw

第一款 蜂蜜緊緻面膜
材料：
雞蛋 1隻
蜂蜜 半茶匙

第二款 美白保濕面膜
材料：
牛奶 少許
蜂蜜 半茶匙
麵粉 適量

第三款 深層滋潤面膜
材料：
牛奶 少許
蜂蜜 半茶匙
牛油果 半個

蜂蜜最好避免接觸金屬，因為金屬會破壞蜂蜜的營養。

花水購自 (平時都係呢間做facial, 係家姐開，手勢好好既)
Appearance C
銅鑼灣謝斐道456-458 號拔萃商業大廈9樓全層
TEL：31794972 WhatsApp：96832583

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Camera: Nikon D5500
Lens: Sigma 17-50mm F2.8 EX DC OS HSM
editing software: final cut pro