In case you missed it...
攝影史敘事工作坊 在 VOP Facebook 的最佳貼文
同時也有1部Youtube影片，追蹤數超過3,110的網紅1 IMAGE ART 一影像，也在其Youtube影片中提到，生長於馬來西亞的華人導演廖克發，而後來台就讀國立台灣藝術大學電影系，學習電影製作。第一部紀錄片是尋找曾為馬共、身影曖昧模糊的祖父的《不即不離》，原為劇情片《菠蘿蜜》做電影背景，是以對馬共議題進行田調。但隨著他浸淫日深，素材累積的份量足夠，也就自成一部紀錄片。 馬共至今於馬來西亞仍是禁忌話題，廖克發...
攝影史敘事工作坊 在 VOP Facebook 的精選貼文
新刊預覽~~✨👀
Voices of Photography 攝影之聲
Issue 27 : 歷史與書寫專題
Histories and Writings Issue
自創刊以來，《攝影之聲》持續關注影像書寫、歷史與文化樣態，隨著2019年我們在台北「空總台灣當代文化實驗場」策劃一系列攝影史敘事工作坊並舉辦戰後東亞攝影史論壇，邀請攝影史研究者共同參與，推進攝影史研究與影像歷史意識的討論契機。本期特別刊載主講者文稿，在日本、韓國與台灣研究者對東亞攝影歷程不同的關注面向中，作為攝影與歷史論述的反思與參照。
其中，金子隆一重新定位1970年代攝影家自主藝廊在日本攝影發展中的位置，揭示非主流的創作脈動，何以是日本攝影史論中需要補遺的重要章節；陳佳琦探討1960年代台灣業餘攝影者參與日本攝影比賽的風潮，以及以日本攝影雜誌作為平台的競賽文化的可能影響，呈現出戰後台、日攝影界另類的民間交流場域；朴平鍾細述自日本殖民統治結束後，韓國攝影在現實主義與現代主義之間引發的論爭，疏理戰後韓國對於攝影認知的辯證與反省；戶田昌子析論1950年代的日本攝影表現，在脫離戰時的壓抑並逐漸獲得解放之後，受國際「主觀主義攝影」潮流影響所開展出日本攝影美學進程的時代軌印；張世倫從冷戰年代深埋於台灣社會的檔案線索與政治意識，檢視戰後台灣的影像操縱、治理機制，以及國族攝影史本身的建構和詮釋問題。
攝影，在與光學、化學、政治社會學、文化研究，乃至符號學與精神分析等學科譜系的結合中，已不斷延展、流動、重構，打開了攝影本體論的探索空間。謝佩君縷析自上世紀以來的攝影書寫歷程與跨領域的視覺理論，勾勒攝影理路的發展形貌，本期將開啟系列討論的首章。顧錚分享於德國海德堡大學客座期間開設攝影史課程的自身經驗，並提出攝影史學門研究邊界的批判思索。黎健強剖析攝影術初登香港的歷史推論系列來到末篇，為濕版法在1850年代於香港興起的考據，展現不同的史料論證。
此外，本期我們特別專訪陳傳興，刊載他於上世紀七〇年代末拍攝、四十年間未曾公開的照片及底片，一探銀鹽與光交集而生的影像喻意，以及他不停思辨的攝影本質論題。同時，我們也介紹高重黎的聲音與投影裝置新作，析解視聽機器現成物及獨特的一鏡到底、史上最長的「放影機電影」中的技術哲學。「攝影書製作現場」連載則進入「設計」單元，本期專訪日本設計師森大志郎，分享他細膩的平面設計語彙。
儘管維持出版的路途艱辛，這些年我們仍努力在有限的資源下，持續進行資料考掘整理、訪談記錄等基礎工作，緩緩開展以台灣及亞洲地緣為核心的攝影文化與歷史論述。感謝親愛的讀者與朋友的支持，讓我們在新的一年裡，繼續探索未知的影像星河。
▍購買本期 BUY | http://bit.ly/vop-27
Since its inception, Voices of Photography has always focused on the aspects of image writing, history and cultural forms. In 2019, we held a series of workshops on photography history narratives and a forum on history of post-war East Asian photography, at the Taiwan Contemporary Culture Lab in Taipei, Taiwan. We invited researchers in this field to join us, creating the opportunity to advance discussions on photography history research and awareness of imagery history. This issue features the manuscripts of our speakers at the event, which will serve as a reflection and reference for the photography and historical discourse in the eyes of our counterparts in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan.
Among them, Kaneko Ryuchi has redefined the position of independent photography galleries in the development of Japanese photography in the 1970s, revealing the creative pulses that transcended the mainstream and why it became an important chapter in the history of Japanese photography, waiting to be filled. Chen Chia-Chi takes a look at the trend of Taiwanese amateur photographers participating in photography contests in Japan in the 1960s, and the possible influence that Japanese photography magazines had on the culture of photo competition, thereby shedding light on an alternative platform through which folk exchanges happened between the Taiwanese and Japanese photography fields. Park Pyungjong details the controversy between realism and modernism in Korean photography following the end of colonial rule by the Japanese, and evaluates the dialectics and reflections surrounding Korea’s understanding of photography after the war. Toda Masako analyzes Japanese photography in the 1950s, the era of Japanese photographic aesthetics that was influenced by the trend of “subjectivism” in the international arena as the oppression of war gradually faded in time. Through archives and political consciousness buried deep in the core of the Taiwanese society since the Cold War era, Chang Shih-Lun examines the manipulation and governance mechanism of images, and issues with the construction and interpretation of the nationality in photography history.
When analyzed in combination with other disciplines such as optics, chemistry, political sociology, cultural studies, and even semiotics and psychoanalysis, the space for exploration of the ontology of photography is constantly stretched, moved, and reconstructed. Hsieh Pei-Chun analyzes the photographic writing process and the cross-domain visual theory since the last century while outlining the development of photography theories. This issue is the first in a series of discussions. Gu Zheng shares his own experience as a visiting professor on photography history at the University of Heidelberg, Germany, where he put forward a critical reflection on the boundaries of research in the field of photography history. Edwin K. Lai's analysis of the series of historical inferences from when photography first came to Hong Kong comes to an end, presenting historical evidence of the rise of the “wet-plate method” in Hong Kong in the 1850s.
In addition, we have a special interview with Cheng Tsun-Shing, featuring never-before-published photographs and negatives that he had taken in the late 1970s. We explore the imagery metaphors that are born when silver salt and light meet, and the issue of the essence of photography that he constantly philosophizes. At the same time, we feature Kao Chung-Li’s new works of sound and projection installations, analyzing the ready-made audio-visual equipment and the technical philosophy behind the unique one-take "projector movie", that is also the longest ever such film in history. The "Photobook Making Case Study" series also enters the "Design" chapter. In this issue, we interview Japanese designer Mori Daishiro and he shares his experiences in the area of graphic design.
Although the journey of publication is difficult, we have been striving to continue with the basics of data exploration, collation, and interviews with limited resources, as we slowly expand the photography culture and historical discourses of Taiwan and Asia and showcase them to the world. We would like t✨o thank all our dear readers and friends for your utmost support. Let us continue to explore the unknown universe of images in the new year.
---
Voices of Photography 攝影之聲
www.vopmagazine.com
攝影史敘事工作坊 在 VOP Facebook 的精選貼文
Voices of Photography 攝影之聲
Issue 27 : 歷史與書寫專題
Histories and Writings Issue
自創刊以來，《攝影之聲》持續關注影像書寫、歷史與文化樣態，隨著2019年我們在台北「空總台灣當代文化實驗場」策劃一系列攝影史敘事工作坊並舉辦戰後東亞攝影史論壇，邀請攝影史研究者共同參與，推進攝影史研究與影像歷史意識的討論契機。本期特別刊載主講者文稿，在日本、韓國與台灣研究者對東亞攝影歷程不同的關注面向中，作為攝影與歷史論述的反思與參照。
其中，金子隆一重新定位1970年代攝影家自主藝廊在日本攝影發展中的位置，揭示非主流的創作脈動，何以是日本攝影史論中需要補遺的重要章節；陳佳琦探討1960年代台灣業餘攝影者參與日本攝影比賽的風潮，以及以日本攝影雜誌作為平台的競賽文化的可能影響，呈現出戰後台、日攝影界另類的民間交流場域；朴平鍾細述自日本殖民統治結束後，韓國攝影在現實主義與現代主義之間引發的論爭，疏理戰後韓國對於攝影認知的辯證與反省；戶田昌子析論1950年代的日本攝影表現，在脫離戰時的壓抑並逐漸獲得解放之後，受國際「主觀主義攝影」潮流影響所開展出日本攝影美學進程的時代軌印；張世倫從冷戰年代深埋於台灣社會的檔案線索與政治意識，檢視戰後台灣的影像操縱、治理機制，以及國族攝影史本身的建構和詮釋問題。
攝影，在與光學、化學、政治社會學、文化研究，乃至符號學與精神分析等學科譜系的結合中，已不斷延展、流動、重構，打開了攝影本體論的探索空間。謝佩君縷析自上世紀以來的攝影書寫歷程與跨領域的視覺理論，勾勒攝影理路的發展形貌，本期將開啟系列討論的首章。顧錚分享於德國海德堡大學客座期間開設攝影史課程的自身經驗，並提出攝影史學門研究邊界的批判思索。黎健強剖析攝影術初登香港的歷史推論系列來到末篇，為濕版法在1850年代於香港興起的考據，展現不同的史料論證。
此外，本期我們特別專訪陳傳興，刊載他於上世紀七〇年代末拍攝、四十年間未曾公開的照片及底片，一探銀鹽與光交集而生的影像喻意，以及他不停思辨的攝影本質論題。同時，我們也介紹高重黎的聲音與投影裝置新作，析解視聽機器現成物及獨特的一鏡到底、史上最長的「放影機電影」中的技術哲學。「攝影書製作現場」連載則進入「設計」單元，本期專訪日本設計師森大志郎，分享他細膩的平面設計語彙。
儘管維持出版的路途艱辛，這些年我們仍努力在有限的資源下，持續進行資料考掘整理、訪談記錄等基礎工作，緩緩開展以台灣及亞洲地緣為核心的攝影文化與歷史論述。感謝親愛的讀者與朋友的支持，讓我們在新的一年裡，繼續探索未知的影像星河。
▍購買本期 BUY | http://bit.ly/vop-27
Since its inception, Voices of Photography has always focused on the aspects of image writing, history and cultural forms. In 2019, we held a series of workshops on photography history narratives and a forum on history of post-war East Asian photography, at the Taiwan Contemporary Culture Lab in Taipei, Taiwan. We invited researchers in this field to join us, creating the opportunity to advance discussions on photography history research and awareness of imagery history. This issue features the manuscripts of our speakers at the event, which will serve as a reflection and reference for the photography and historical discourse in the eyes of our counterparts in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan.
Among them, Kaneko Ryuchi has redefined the position of independent photography galleries in the development of Japanese photography in the 1970s, revealing the creative pulses that transcended the mainstream and why it became an important chapter in the history of Japanese photography, waiting to be filled. Chen Chia-Chi takes a look at the trend of Taiwanese amateur photographers participating in photography contests in Japan in the 1960s, and the possible influence that Japanese photography magazines had on the culture of photo competition, thereby shedding light on an alternative platform through which folk exchanges happened between the Taiwanese and Japanese photography fields. Park Pyungjong details the controversy between realism and modernism in Korean photography following the end of colonial rule by the Japanese, and evaluates the dialectics and reflections surrounding Korea’s understanding of photography after the war. Toda Masako analyzes Japanese photography in the 1950s, the era of Japanese photographic aesthetics that was influenced by the trend of “subjectivism” in the international arena as the oppression of war gradually faded in time. Through archives and political consciousness buried deep in the core of the Taiwanese society since the Cold War era, Chang Shih-Lun examines the manipulation and governance mechanism of images, and issues with the construction and interpretation of the nationality in photography history.
When analyzed in combination with other disciplines such as optics, chemistry, political sociology, cultural studies, and even semiotics and psychoanalysis, the space for exploration of the ontology of photography is constantly stretched, moved, and reconstructed. Hsieh Pei-Chun analyzes the photographic writing process and the cross-domain visual theory since the last century while outlining the development of photography theories. This issue is the first in a series of discussions. Gu Zheng shares his own experience as a visiting professor on photography history at the University of Heidelberg, Germany, where he put forward a critical reflection on the boundaries of research in the field of photography history. Edwin K. Lai's analysis of the series of historical inferences from when photography first came to Hong Kong comes to an end, presenting historical evidence of the rise of the “wet-plate method” in Hong Kong in the 1850s.
In addition, we have a special interview with Cheng Tsun-Shing, featuring never-before-published photographs and negatives that he had taken in the late 1970s. We explore the imagery metaphors that are born when silver salt and light meet, and the issue of the essence of photography that he constantly philosophizes. At the same time, we feature Kao Chung-Li’s new works of sound and projection installations, analyzing the ready-made audio-visual equipment and the technical philosophy behind the unique one-take "projector movie", that is also the longest ever such film in history. The "Photobook Making Case Study" series also enters the "Design" chapter. In this issue, we interview Japanese designer Mori Daishiro and he shares his experiences in the area of graphic design.
Although the journey of publication is difficult, we have been striving to continue with the basics of data exploration, collation, and interviews with limited resources, as we slowly expand the photography culture and historical discourses of Taiwan and Asia and showcase them to the world. We would like to thank all our dear readers and friends for your utmost support. Let us continue to explore the unknown universe of images in the new year.
---
Voices of Photography 攝影之聲
www.vopmagazine.com
攝影史敘事工作坊 在 1 IMAGE ART 一影像 Youtube 的最讚貼文
生長於馬來西亞的華人導演廖克發，而後來台就讀國立台灣藝術大學電影系，學習電影製作。第一部紀錄片是尋找曾為馬共、身影曖昧模糊的祖父的《不即不離》，原為劇情片《菠蘿蜜》做電影背景，是以對馬共議題進行田調。但隨著他浸淫日深，素材累積的份量足夠，也就自成一部紀錄片。
馬共至今於馬來西亞仍是禁忌話題，廖克發採訪的對象大多不在馬來西亞，散居於泰國、中國與香港，過著不斷轉換身份的生活，隱藏著身世與革命的故事。 單純想要理解祖父為何加入馬共的廖克發，在《不即不離》完成的過程裡，持續發現當年左派運動是年輕人為了生命的迫切所需，對抗日本以及英國的殖民，想要更有尊嚴與自由，建立一個理想的社會，很自然甚至可以說是唯一的選擇。
廖克發認為，對政治事務的冷漠冷感，其來有自，並非所謂個人的選擇或立場，而是有一個久遠的脈絡發展──當推進、創造理想社會的人們沒有受到重視，其犧牲完全被扔擲於國家與歷史的敘事以外，未曾轉換為正義時，後來的人也就在長期的審查與壓抑中，被訓練、教導成無法信仰正義，難以想像更好也更平等的可能。 從回溯自身家庭到發掘整代馬共人淹沒歷史的《不即不離》，也就開啟了廖克發的第二部紀錄片《還有一些樹》，由馬來西亞1969年後見於郵件的戳章，進行對種族議題的深刻探討。
馬來西亞社會大致可分為馬來人、華人、印度人與原住民等。馬來西亞在脫離英國殖民獨立建國時，簽署了馬來人享有經濟與教育等的優惠特權，華人與印度人則是能享有公民權的協定。 而華人與馬來人種族衝突的513事件，肇因於反對黨在1969年全國選舉頭一回超越執政黨政府得票率，大肆慶祝遊行，引發馬來人的反感，也上街示威，最後演變成戒嚴，與及大規模屠殺事件。該戳章所註明的禁止散播謠言，即是不允許討論、質疑該事件，乃至馬來人在馬來西亞的特權。《還有一些樹》透過訪談與歷史資料，耙梳了513事件的始末，同時也凝視種族政策最底層受害者原住民的困境。
廖克發發覺，在華人被馬來人以及政府軍警慘烈殺害時，也知曉華人內部的自相殘殺，甚至及於華人對更少數，尤其是原住民族的剝削與壓迫。他乃對自己提問，會不會他也同樣是一名種族主義者？主要是他警省到，自身總是從華人是種族主義受害者的角度去思維，而罔顧其他被華人既得利益下的邊緣民族。而如此疑惑更拉高視野地思維著樹（自然環境）與人類的關係，特別是為了經濟開發，對原住民棲息地、森林的砍伐，透過樹的靜默與見證與原民祖先的洞穴探勘，也就隱隱有人類對自然的態度不也是種族主義作為的體會。 廖克發從幼年熱愛看牛仔電影說起，其時他對正義的想像，就是那些槍殺印第安人的西部牛仔皆是英雄。直至成人看了《與狼共舞》方才瞭解，印第安人是被壓迫的對象。
換言之，影像所造成的偏見遠大過於關於正義的探索。 廖克發強調，任何太方便、簡化的敘事跟立場，都是危險的。拍紀錄片必須有疑惑，明白沒有一種面向可以是全面性、全客觀的紀錄。活在複雜的世界，必須有多重、多部的聲音。單一故事永遠不夠，需要有很多故事與作品，討論同一個事情。說故事的權力掌握在誰身上這件事情，得保持懷疑。紀錄片工作者不能牢牢握住這種權力不放，要能時時刻刻反省自身的意圖與認知。這也是為何廖克發會謹慎對待受訪者，要重複確認他們是不是願意將受訪內容公諸於世。
小檔案
廖克發，1979年出生於馬來西亞怡保，實佻遠（Sitiawan）。就讀於國立新加坡大學商業學系，卻熱衷於文學創作以及出國遊學，曾獲大專文學獎。畢業後任教於新加坡小學四年後，來台學習電影製作，2011年畢業於國立台灣藝術大學電影系。兩部作品曾獲得台灣金穗獎最佳學生影片，曾獲最佳導演，並在2015年釜山國際影展獲得超廣角亞洲最佳短片。編劇作品長片劇本《菠蘿蜜漫長的飄香等待》，根據祖父二戰時參戰的生命故事改編，獲優等劇本獎；被選為2015法國南特影展，台北劇本工作坊。成立蜂鳥影像有限公司，製作劇情與紀錄影片。參與2013年的侯孝賢導演執導的金馬學院。曾任臺灣國家地理頻道攝影師。
拍攝的電影多與東南亞華人有關，其中紀錄片《不即不離》因涉及有關馬來亞共產黨的敏感歷史，在馬來西亞被全面禁演。2019年以劇情片《菠蘿蜜》入圍第56屆金馬獎最佳新導演，同年紀錄片《還有一些樹》也入圍金馬獎最佳紀錄片。
創辦人：馬立群 監製：王姿佩 採訪：沈眠 攝影／後製：馬立群 作品提供：廖克發 場地提供：倆人攝影棚
