【了解血便】大便有血成因眾多
⭐痔瘡大腸癌都有可能
⭐大人小朋友都有機會出現
#星期三CheckCheckMail
大便有血是大腸癌?
成叔:「看了網上資訊說大便有血是大腸癌先兆,我剛剛大便有血怎麼辦?」
CheckCheckCin:先保持冷靜,大便有血成因很多,要先了解大便狀況,包括次數、糞便狀態以及出血程度。一般來說如果出血色鮮紅而大便乾硬,有可能是大便排出時令肛門受損而出血;又或者痔瘡出血。如果出血色深、或者血與大便混合的話,有可能是消化道有損傷,而從中醫角度來看,濕熱、陰虛、陽虛都會導致大便下血,例如工作繁忙、多熬夜而導致肝腎陰虛,會令大便乾結出血,伴隨症狀為口燥咽乾、五心煩熱、失眠多夢等,就可以飲用有清熱滋陰功效的茶療紓緩症狀。
大便有血的確是大腸癌症狀之一,但這種出血有可能血量極少 ,根本無法用肉眼看得出來,需要接受相關化驗才能確認。如果你已經50歲或以上,可以進行大便隱血測試以了解更多。
梨乾茅根槐花茶
材料:梨乾4片、茅根12克、槐花6克、蜂蜜適量
功效:清熱涼血。紓緩因虛火而引起的大便出血、口乾、咽喉乾痛、大便乾結等症狀。
做法:材料剪小放保溫瓶,以熱水沖洗一遍,再注入熱水焗10分鐘,可反覆沖泡至味淡。建議一星期飲用2-3天,連續兩星期為一個療程。
留言或按讚👍🏻支持一下我們吧!❤️ 歡迎 Follow 我們獲得更多養生資訊。
Blood in stool – a sign of colon cancer?
“I read from the Internet stools that contain traces of blood is a symptom of colon cancer. And I recently realized there was blood in my stool. What should I do?”
CheckCheckCin: We need to calm down and acknowledge that many factors might cause blood to appear in stool. Firstly, we need to observe frequency of bowel movement, the shape of our stool, and the bleeding condition.
In general, the bright-red blood on dry and hard stool is due to fissures or small tears in the lining of the anus or hemorrhoids. If the blood looks dark or mixed with feces, there is a possibility that there is damage in the digestive tract.
From the perspective of Chinese Medicine, damp heat, yin deficiency, and yang deficiency can cause blood to appear in stool. For instance, staying up late and having a hectic work schedule can cause the liver and kidney to experience yin deficiency, hence, causing dry stool to take shape. Other accompanying symptoms include dry mouth and throat, constantly feeling irritable and warm, insomnia and excessive dreaming. Drinking herbal tea that clears heat and nourishes the yin can relieve these symptoms.
Spotting blood in stool can indeed be a symptom of colon cancer, but the volume of blood that is visible to the eye is minimal. One can only confirm his or her suspicion after going through a thorough checkup. If you are aged 50 and above, consider taking the fecal occult blood test to find out more.
Pear and couch grass root tea with sophora
Effects: Clears heat and cools blood. Relieves symptoms of blood in stool, dry mouth, sore throat, dry stool caused by asthenic heat.
Ingredients: 4 pieces dried pear, 12g couch grass root, 6g sophora, honey to taste
Preparation: Cut the ingredients into small pieces and place into thermos. Rinse once with hot water, add in hot water and steep for 10 minutes until aroma develops. This tea can be re-brewed until flavour weakens. For best results, drink consecutively for 2-3 days. Two weeks for a treatment.
Comment below or like 👍🏻 this post to support us. ❤️ Follow us for more healthy living tips.
#男 #女 #我枯燥 #我煩躁 #我畏冷 #陰虛 #濕熱 #陽虛
同時也有3部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過6萬的網紅粒方不插電,也在其Youtube影片中提到,遊戲購買連結: https://www.ruten.com.tw/item/show?22042658513851 歡迎再度來到桌遊秀!這次要來玩的是Among Us太空狼人殺的桌遊版 The Menace Among Us! 我們究竟能不能在達成目標的情況下存活呢? 快來看看吧! Among...
above suspicion 在 李怡 Facebook 的最讚貼文
To Smash a Cracked Pot |Lee Yee
The national security honeymoon, the calm before the storm, is over. The sword of Damocles above our heads comes swinging down.
Against the professional recommendations of the Board of Education, the University of Hong Kong’s (HKU) governing council went with the majority’s decision and fired Benny Tai Yiu-ting, associate professor of the Faculty of Law. Certainly, no one would challenge Benny Tai’s comment that the decision to terminate his appointment was made by “an authority beyond the university through its agents”.
Three males and one female, aged between 16 and 21, were arrested on suspicion of “secession” in violation of the national security law. There was no action, only online speeches. Perhaps the few words by these teenagers are powerful enough to split a country of 1.4 billion people?
I had been pondering whether the Communists and their bootlickers would adopt the disqualification tactic or the postponement tactic in the upcoming Legislative Council election. The answer has been revealed that mass disqualifications would come first, and then a postponement may follow. Some said that the Communists are “braver” than I had predicted; but to borrow a young person’s words, which I find to be more suitable: rationality limits my imagination.
The three-part strike happened within a period of two days, putting an end to the honeymoon where the CCP had once sought dialogue, probed, soothed, and observed the global siege led by the United States. Now the CCP is addressing the US sanctions head-on while flexing its muscles by targeting Hongkongers.
This also illustrates that the attempt by the pan-democrats to navigate within the cavity of the national security law, to try to compromise on the confirmation letter to see a way out through election was an utter, complete failure. They could have followed my suggestion from a month ago, to run in the election with proud and loud opposition against the national security law, to welcome being disqualified and show the civilized world “what the CCP is plotting against Hong Kong”. That would have been more courageous. Yet some pushed their luck, and now they face the same fate of being disqualified.
CCP’s honeymoon period following the implementation of the national security law in Hong Kong was based on the assumption, by the CCP as well as other overseas observers, that Trump’s tough policy toward China was for his election campaign. Since the current projection of the election seems unfavorable to Trump, that there is hope for the Democrats to take over, and the US might change its policy toward China.
When the United States ordered the closure of the Chinese Consulate in Houston, and when the four top officials, especially Pompeo’s declaration of resistance to China, made it clear that the US ultra-cold war strategy towards China is unlikely to be reversible.
Stephen Young, a senior diplomat who had stationed in Beijing, Hong Kong, and Taipei, said that demanding other countries to close their consulates is a very drastic strategy. In the past, if a foreign diplomatic agency had a blunder, actions would usually have been taken against a person. The closures of the consulates suggest that the relationship is close to a break-up.
On July 25, the New York Times published the words of Ryan Hass, the President of the US National Security Council in the Obama era, that said, “They want to reorient the U.S.-China relationship toward an all-encompassing systemic rivalry that cannot be reversed by the outcome of the upcoming U.S. election. They believe this reorientation is needed to put the United States on a competitive footing against its 21st-century geostrategic rival.”
The two bills on Hong Kong, and the one on Xinjiang Uyghurs, were all passed almost unanimously in the US Senate and the House of Representatives. The Speaker of the House and Democrat, Pelosi, was particularly enthusiastic; left-wing media such as the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, though have been critical of Trump, have both affirmed and even encouraged Trump’s anti-China policy.
This has been a 180 from Trump’s previous declaration of “America First” when he did not hesitate to offend the United Kingdom, the European Union, and even Asia-Pacific countries. Pompeo has recently been chummy with Europe and the Asia-Pacific to ally up, and emphasized in his anti-CCP declaration the need for the free world to act together. In fact, Trump’s unilateralism has pivoted, and the allies have returned to their positions one after another, and a global siege towards China has gradually been formed.
Has China been in touch with the US Democratic Party in private to probe whether its China policy will change if it wins the general election? There is no way of knowing. Even if so, the answer is apparent.
The US policy toward China leaves no room for maneuver, and the power-hungry CCP must now hold tight onto the hastily enacted national security law till the end. The longer they hold out, who knows how many more Hong Kong officials or pro-Beijing people would be affected along the lines of Bernard Chan and his sanctioned foreign bank.
What the CCP and its Hong Kong bootlickers are doing could be described with the Chinese idiom “to smash a cracked pot”. The pot is already cracked, then just smash it. It means that there are blemishes, and mistakes that cannot be corrected or will not be correct, then why not send the helve after the hatchet.
Lu Xun said, “When the brave is angered, he draws the sword towards the stronger; when the coward is angered, he draws the sword towards the weaker.” Disqualifications coupled with the postponement, is it “braver”? Or rather, “the coward is angered”.
above suspicion 在 電影潭 Facebook 的精選貼文
《查案記》Investigation of a Citizen Above Suspicion (1970, dir: Elio Petri)
都有好一段時間沒有觀看警察題材電影。
電影主角是一名準備升職到政治部工作的兇殺組警探,他在電影開始時就殺死了他的情婦,並刻意把案發現場佈置得線索處處,顯得殺人犯好像是一名初哥。
其實這只是主角想要看看自己的權力有多大的一個陰謀。大陸直譯這套電影的名稱為《對一個不容懷疑的公民的調查》,準確得我實在不能話它錯。明明那些線索最終紛紛只向自己,明明他已經叫人指證自己,但從來沒有人想要懷疑這名警隊中平步青雲的大人物。主角後來甚至向同事上司們直認不諱,但他們的反應...官官相衛下更突出到官僚制度腐敗到不堪入目。
這套電影Surreal 得讓我想起布紐爾的戲,但有時候,超現實的故事背後,往往是最寫實的嘲諷。
above suspicion 在 粒方不插電 Youtube 的精選貼文
遊戲購買連結: https://www.ruten.com.tw/item/show?22042658513851
歡迎再度來到桌遊秀!這次要來玩的是Among Us太空狼人殺的桌遊版 The Menace Among Us!
我們究竟能不能在達成目標的情況下存活呢? 快來看看吧!
Among Us》是一款多人電子遊戲,由美國]遊戲工作室InnerSloth開發並於2018年6月15日發布。遊戲以太空為主題,玩家將扮演船員(Crewmate)或入侵者(Impostor)之一。船員的目標找出入侵者並完成任務,而入侵者的目標是殺死所有船員而不被發現。雖然遊戲於2018年發布,但鮮有問津,直到2020年因為眾多Twitch實況主和YouTuber遊玩才流行起來。為回應遊戲的熱度,遊戲開發者於2020年8月宣布將開發續作《Among Us 2》,但是一個月後(9月)宣布取消續作的開發,將重點轉移到改進原版遊戲上
The Menace Among Us is a semi-cooperative game of intrigue and survival in deep space. Adrift and powerless, your crippled vessel is bleeding oxygen. As you effect repairs, every breath you take brings you one step closer to death. You must work together to restore power before the air runs out — but hidden among you, as loyal friends and crew members, are imposters who have infiltrated security and continue to sabotage the ship. Their only goal is to avoid detection and kill the crew, by force or by asphyxiation. Can you identify them in time and eliminate the threat? Or will succumb to the menace among us?
The Menace Among Us is a 40 to 60-minute, asymmetrical card game for 4-8 players. Each player chooses an Agenda at random, either a loyal Crew member, a deadly Menace or the Coward, who’ll take any side just to survive. Your Agenda card sets a Team Goal and an Individual Goal, as well as outlines any special abilities and the card composition of your individual 13-card deck. Then, knowing your Agenda and Goals, you choose a Character who you believe will best help you achieve them or mask your true identity. Characters add 7 new cards to your deck, shuffle-building a unique combination of cards, as well as provide you two specialized Above Deck Actions.
In this hidden traitor game, how you play your cards and abilities is far more important than the meta game aspects of accusations and denials. Cards are played face down and shuffled together as “Below Deck Actions.” Here, Menace players secretly sabotage the ship’s systems and attack crew members, who are trying to save the ship with their cards. If too few crew members risk going below deck to effect repairs, the ship’s Emergency Maintenance Assistant (EmMA) adds cards to the pile to help. However, the system has also been compromised and occasionally places damaging cards into the mix, providing plausible deniability to the Menace players. In contrast, Above Deck Actions are conducted in full view of the crew. Most of these abilities have costs, either in Energy or Oxygen, both resources the crew is trying to increase. So, while The Doctor has the ability to heal a crew member and remove a debilitating effect, a Menace player, who may be secretly in control of The Doctor, cares far more that it costs 2 Oxygen to perform the healing.
At some point, someone’s behavior will raise suspicion. But, did they do so because they are trying to fulfill an Individual Goal – or are they a Menace? You can call a vote to expose their true nature. But if they are a loyal Crew member, you’ve just blown precious Oxygen in the effort to detain them. For that matter, was it a Menace player calling the vote in hopes of wasting the air on purpose?
If the Crew can find and eliminate the Menace players – and raise the Energy to a safe threshold before the air runs out, they win. If the Menace can prevent this or kill the crew outright, their mission succeeds. Special commendations are awarded for surviving and for achieving your Individual Goal.
娛樂百分百
凹鳴狼人殺
above suspicion 在 粒方不插電 Youtube 的精選貼文
The Menace Among Us太空狼人殺桌遊版 這裡買: https://www.ruten.com.tw/item/show?22042658513851
講到陣營遊戲 大部分的人想到的應該都是狼人殺、阿瓦隆,但你知道其實有很多比這幾個遊戲更好玩的陣營遊戲嗎? 快來看看吧!
死亡寒冬
CS Files犯罪現場
威脅潛伏 The Menace Among Us (太空狼人殺)
人類懲戒
太空堡壘:卡拉狄加
The Menace Among Us is a semi-cooperative game of intrigue and survival in deep space. Adrift and powerless, your crippled vessel is bleeding oxygen. As you effect repairs, every breath you take brings you one step closer to death. You must work together to restore power before the air runs out — but hidden among you, as loyal friends and crew members, are imposters who have infiltrated security and continue to sabotage the ship. Their only goal is to avoid detection and kill the crew, by force or by asphyxiation. Can you identify them in time and eliminate the threat? Or will succumb to the menace among us?
The Menace Among Us is a 40 to 60-minute, asymmetrical card game for 4-8 players. Each player chooses an Agenda at random, either a loyal Crew member, a deadly Menace or the Coward, who’ll take any side just to survive. Your Agenda card sets a Team Goal and an Individual Goal, as well as outlines any special abilities and the card composition of your individual 13-card deck. Then, knowing your Agenda and Goals, you choose a Character who you believe will best help you achieve them or mask your true identity. Characters add 7 new cards to your deck, shuffle-building a unique combination of cards, as well as provide you two specialized Above Deck Actions.
In this hidden traitor game, how you play your cards and abilities is far more important than the meta game aspects of accusations and denials. Cards are played face down and shuffled together as “Below Deck Actions.” Here, Menace players secretly sabotage the ship’s systems and attack crew members, who are trying to save the ship with their cards. If too few crew members risk going below deck to effect repairs, the ship’s Emergency Maintenance Assistant (EmMA) adds cards to the pile to help. However, the system has also been compromised and occasionally places damaging cards into the mix, providing plausible deniability to the Menace players. In contrast, Above Deck Actions are conducted in full view of the crew. Most of these abilities have costs, either in Energy or Oxygen, both resources the crew is trying to increase. So, while The Doctor has the ability to heal a crew member and remove a debilitating effect, a Menace player, who may be secretly in control of The Doctor, cares far more that it costs 2 Oxygen to perform the healing.
At some point, someone’s behavior will raise suspicion. But, did they do so because they are trying to fulfill an Individual Goal – or are they a Menace? You can call a vote to expose their true nature. But if they are a loyal Crew member, you’ve just blown precious Oxygen in the effort to detain them. For that matter, was it a Menace player calling the vote in hopes of wasting the air on purpose?
If the Crew can find and eliminate the Menace players – and raise the Energy to a safe threshold before the air runs out, they win. If the Menace can prevent this or kill the crew outright, their mission succeeds. Special commendations are awarded for surviving and for achieving your Individual Goal.
娛樂百分百 狼人殺
above suspicion 在 Indrani Kopal Youtube 的精選貼文
Yearning for a Bersih electoral system
A Cry For Royal Help / Part 2
Produced by Indrani Kopal
THE ISSUE: All that the Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections (Bersih) wants is an election system that is free of taint and above suspicion.
In aid of this, the grouping - comprising 67 NGOs and five opposition parties - has been active in canvassing voter support, while also lobbying the Election Commission (EC) to implement its ideas.
Earlier this year, it held low-key meetings with the EC and roadshows to educate the public about what should constitute clean and fair elections in Malaysia.
These efforts bore fruit - the EC agreed to use indelible ink to curb multiple voting and even to introduce transparent voting boxes in the next general election. Still, this apparently fell short of Bersihs demands.
When the coalition took its case to supporters in Kuala Terengganu in September, its planned ceramah attracted action. The cops moved in, sealed off the venue, and used force to deal with resistance - live bullets injured two people.
Not to be intimidated, Bersih reacted with plans for a massive rally in Kuala Lumpur on Nov 10. Despite a police cordon and use of water cannon and tear gas, some 40,000 protesters managed to march to Istana Negara where a petition was handed to the Kings representative.
Full story in Malaysiakini.com
above suspicion 在 Above Suspicion (2019) - IMDb 的相關結果
Based on the true story of one of the most notorious crimes in FBI history,. ... <看更多>
above suspicion 在 Above Suspicion - Rotten Tomatoes 的相關結果
Based on the true story of one of the most notorious crimes in FBI history, this gritty crime-thriller stars Emilia Clarke ("Game of Thrones") as Susan ... ... <看更多>
above suspicion 在 Above Suspicion (2019 film) - Wikipedia 的相關結果
Above Suspicion is a 2019 American crime thriller film directed by Phillip Noyce, from a screenplay by Chris Gerolmo, based upon Joe Sharkey's non-fiction ... ... <看更多>