【吳文遠十一遊行案法庭陳詞 — 中文譯本】
法官閣下:
從小我父母便教我要有同理心,要關顧社會上相對不幸的人。儘管在早年職業生涯上取得不俗成就,但我從來沒有意欲將追求個人財富視為人生目標。
當我在國外生活了多年後回到香港定居時,我為這個我自豪地稱之為家的城市,存在如此嚴重的社會不平等而感到困惑和擔憂。 令我震驚的是,社會如何漠視對窮人和少數族裔的歧視。既有的社會結構,有時甚至會鼓勵這種歧視繼續發生。同時,我們也無法一如其它地方,享有基本的民主權利和自由。
這些都是我參與社會運動以至參與政治的動機。我希望盡己所能,為被忽視的弱勢階層鼓與呼,替不能為自己發聲的人說話。
與許多人相比,我很幸運能夠接受良好教育,並擁有一定程度上的財務自由和社會地位。我們很幸運,能夠過上舒適生活,並有自由選擇我們的道路。我選擇為社會平等而奮鬥。其實這個法庭上許多人都差不多,我們都喜歡香港,這個稱為家的地方。或許我們在生活中選擇了不同的角色,但目標都是相同:為他人服務。
可悲的是,我擔心我們已經逐漸成為社會制度中的例外。當下許多香港人根本沒有那些機會,包括貧困長者,欠缺向上流動機會、被邊緣化的年輕人,還有犧牲所有時間但只能為家庭僅僅維持基本生活的工人。這些人再努力,生活中的選擇仍然局限於維持生計。對他們來說,「選擇」是負擔不起的奢侈品,更不用說如何決定自己的命運。
在生活壓力下,我們的視野通常很難超越自身的社交圈子,更難的是對陌生人展現同理心。兩極化的政治分歧產生越來越多裂痕,令我們有時候無法互相理解、和而不同,亦不願意試圖尋求某種程度的妥協。
我一直希望,一個較民主的制度能夠成為一道橋樑,彌合上述社會鴻溝,或者至少容讓我們選擇怎樣共同生活。
2019年的動盪,為整個社會帶來了沉重的打擊。無論政治立場如何,我敢肯定這個法庭上有許多人,都為此而傷心欲絕。整座城市都被不信任、仇恨和恐懼所淹沒。今天固然不是討論這個問題的合適地方,但我希望法庭能夠理解,僅靠司法機構並不能解決已經根深蒂固的社會政治鴻溝。
我們需要集體力量、勇氣、誠實和同理心來修補我們的家。看看幾位同案被告,他們在服務社會方面有著非凡的紀錄。比起囚禁在監獄,我相信他們能夠對社會作出更大貢獻。
為了追求全體香港人的權利,我的確違反了法律,並且已準備面對法院的判決。令人敬重的幾位同案被告,畢生捍衛法治,為民主而戰,為無聲者發聲,我十分榮幸能夠與他們並肩同行。
我相信終有一天,籠罩我們城市的烏雲將會消散,光明將會重臨,愛和同理心將會戰勝歸來。
吳文遠
2021年5月24日
Avery Ng Man Yuen’s Statement
Your Honour,
I was brought up by my parents to value the importance of empathy, to care and to feel for others in our community less fortunate. Although I enjoyed great success early in my career, I never had a desire to pursue personal wealth in the more traditional sense.
When I settled back in Hong Kong after years of living abroad, I was baffled and disturbed by how severe the social inequality existed in a city I am proud to call my home. I was struck at how discrimination against the poor and the minorities far too often goes ignored or can even at times is encouraged by the established social structure; and how we cannot have the basic democratic rights and freedoms that other places enjoy.
These were my motivations to join social activism and enter into politics. I chose to spend my energy to speak for the underprivileged, the disenchanted and often ignored segments of society. To offer a voice for those who could not speak for themselves.
Compared to many, I am privileged to have a great education and a certain level of financial freedom and social standing. We are fortunate enough to be able to lead comfortable lives and have the freedom to choose the path that we take. I chose to fight for social equality. Many of those in this court are not that much different. We all love Hong Kong, the place we call home. We chose our different roles in life but with the same aim: to serve others.
Sadly, I fear that many of us are increasingly the exception to the rule. Today far too many Hong Kong people do not have that chance, whether that is our elderly who live in poverty, marginalized youth with few opportunities for social mobility, or workers who give up all their time slaving away to provide the bare minimum for their families. These people all struggle to make ends meet with very limited options in life. “Choice” for them is a luxury that they cannot afford. Let alone having the gratification of being able to dictate their own destiny.
I recognise, with the pressures of life, it is often difficult for people to see beyond their own social bubble. It is harder still to acquire empathy for strangers. Polarized political division increasingly has driven a wedge between people, making it sometimes impossible for people to understand and empathise with one another, to disagree agreeably, and attempt to find some level of compromise.
It has always been my hope that a more democratic system could be the bridge that heals this social divide or at the very least allow us to choose how we can live together in our home.
I’m certain that none of us in this court wanted to see the turmoil in 2019, which has seen our whole society suffer regardless of political preference. Distrust, hatred, and fear has engulfed Hong Kong. Today is certainly not the right forum for this immense topic. However, I hope the court can understand that the Judiciary alone cannot resolve the deep-rooted socio-political divide which exist.
It will take our collective strength, courage, honesty, and empathy to mend our home. Looking at my fellow defendants with their extraordinary history in serving this society, I believe they can do far greater good among us in society than being locked in prison.
In pursuit of the rights of all Hong Kong people, I have broken the law. I am prepared to face the court’s judgement. I am proud to be in the company of my esteemed fellows who have spent their lives championing the rule of law, fighting for the democracy and voicing for the voiceless.
I believe the storm-clouds that currently reside over our home will one day lift, and make way for a bright and clear day. I believe love and empathy will eventually prevail.
————————————
文遠交低話大家記住一定要撐 #文遠Patreon 呀!
⭐️支持文遠⭐️請訂閱Patreon⭐️
www.patreon.com/AveryNg
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過35萬的網紅屎萊姆的3次元,也在其Youtube影片中提到,如果香港能擁有如果…… 如果警察停止濫暴,克盡厥職維護香港法治; 如果警黑停止勾結,以保障市民安全為首任; 如果警方沒有散播「曱甴」仇殺言論; 如果政府停止白色恐怖,尊重香港的自治和自由; 如果香港有真雙普選,保障「開放參政」和「實質競爭」的權利; 也許歷歷在目的是市民的笑容與歡呼而不是血腥...
「hong kong judiciary」的推薦目錄:
- 關於hong kong judiciary 在 吳文遠 Avery Ng Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於hong kong judiciary 在 Apple Daily - English Edition Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於hong kong judiciary 在 Apple Daily - English Edition Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於hong kong judiciary 在 屎萊姆的3次元 Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於hong kong judiciary 在 Top Hong Kong Judge Geoffrey Ma Defends Right to Rule on ... 的評價
- 關於hong kong judiciary 在 South China Morning Post - Hong Kong judiciary starts new year 的評價
hong kong judiciary 在 Apple Daily - English Edition Facebook 的精選貼文
Members of the Hong Kong public may get a say in handling complaints about judges, under a proposal by the judiciary to set up an advisory board headed by the chief justice, local media has reported.
Read more: https://bit.ly/2QUvKLE
立法會將討論有關設立投訴法官機制問題,司法機構就提出引入兩層處理投訴法官機制,當中一層是由終審法院首席法官領導、成員包括「社會人士」的「投訴法官行為諮詢委員會」,負責監察處理針對法官及司法人員的投訴及提出意見。
____________
📱Download the app:
http://onelink.to/appledailyapp
📰 Latest news:
http://appledaily.com/engnews/
🐤 Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/appledaily_hk
💪🏻 Subscribe and show your support:
https://bit.ly/2ZYKpHP
#AppleDailyENG
hong kong judiciary 在 Apple Daily - English Edition Facebook 的最佳解答
#Interview|Throughout her career, barrister and former lawmaker Margaret Ng has been a staunch defender of Hong Kong’s independent judiciary. Yet when Beijing imposed a national security law on the semi-autonomous city last summer, even Ng admitted the rule of law is in dire straits. “We don’t know what’s left of the Hong Kong legal system,” she said.
Read more: https://bit.ly/2QRI7HH
73歲的吳靄儀,香港執業大律師,也是「法治未死」派的中堅分子。2020年4月18日,警方進行「大搜捕」,多名民主派人士被捕,當中包括吳靄儀。她的兩項控罪涉及2019年8月18日的流水式集會,包括參與及組織未經批准集會及遊行,此乃吳靄儀首次被控,被判罪成。
____________
📱Download the app:
http://onelink.to/appledailyapp
📰 Latest news:
http://appledaily.com/engnews/
🐤 Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/appledaily_hk
💪🏻 Subscribe and show your support:
https://bit.ly/2ZYKpHP
#AppleDailyENG
hong kong judiciary 在 屎萊姆的3次元 Youtube 的最讚貼文
如果香港能擁有如果……
如果警察停止濫暴,克盡厥職維護香港法治;
如果警黑停止勾結,以保障市民安全為首任;
如果警方沒有散播「曱甴」仇殺言論;
如果政府停止白色恐怖,尊重香港的自治和自由;
如果香港有真雙普選,保障「開放參政」和「實質競爭」的權利;
也許歷歷在目的是市民的笑容與歡呼而不是血腥與混亂;
也許香港仍能擁有曾經自豪與驕傲的美譽 - 「司法獨立高度自治」與「最安全城市」;
也許為社會注入的是希望與和平而不是絕望與低谷;
也許香港仍然是實踐真正民主的希望燈塔;
也許我們仍能穩守民主社會的基石 – 「人權」與「自由」。
也許……能讓孩子不用承受今天如斯不堪的後果。
如果香港人永不放棄,也許能一同堅守信念創造一個屬於我們最好的結果。
如果你有良知,你願意和我們站在一起嗎?
#五大訴求 #缺一不可 #光復香港 #時代革命 #問誰未發聲 #我願榮光歸香港
What if Hong Kong has a lot of “what if”……
What if police brutality never existed in HK , the Force remained steadfast in their duties to uphold law and order;
What if HK police’s shadowy network of triad gangs collapsed, the Force firmly carried out its mandate to maintain public safety;
What if HK police didn’t slam protestors by labeling “cockroach” and spreading death threats;
What if HongKonger could live without ‘white terror’ but with full respect of autonomy and freedoms;
What if true universal suffrage is committed for Hong Kong, which promotes fair and open competition;
Perhaps scenes of smiles and cheers would be vivid in our minds instead of chaos and bloodshed;
Perhaps Hong Kong could still be proud of its independent judiciary and reputation as one of the safest cities in the world;
Perhaps society would be filled with hopes and peace but not despair and desperation;
Perhaps Hong Kong could still serve as exemplar of freedom and beacon of hope;
Perhaps HongKonger would not be robbed of foundation of democracy - human rights and liberality.
Perhaps…. the young generation would not have to suffer from the unbearable and miserable situation today.
What if HongKonger never give up, perhaps we may unite to fight for our beliefs and strike for best result.
What if you have a conscience, are you willing to stand with us?
#FiveDemands #NotOneLess #LiberateHongKong #RevolutionOfOurTimes #DoYouHearThePeopleSing
#GloryToHongKong
hong kong judiciary 在 South China Morning Post - Hong Kong judiciary starts new year 的推薦與評價
Hong Kong judiciary starts new year. Hong Kong marks the start of new legal year. 488. ·100 Comments·122 Shares. ... <看更多>
hong kong judiciary 在 Top Hong Kong Judge Geoffrey Ma Defends Right to Rule on ... 的推薦與評價
Hong Kong's retiring top judge Geoffrey Ma says an independent judiciary is key to maintaining the rule of law. Chief Justice Geoffrey Ma ... ... <看更多>