關於 presidential system ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

入住 @lagunaredang 總統套房。兩個私人陽台, 四張陽台椅子和休閒籐椅, 兩個曬衣服毛巾架子，一個私人客廳，兩個大沙發，兩個超級大電視機，私人音響系統, 四間廁所 分為 兩個wc 一個沖涼房 一個浴缸spa 房，一個私人化妝台，一個私人工作區，咖啡茶巴台，冰廚，一個超級大雙人床，和無邊無際的海洋海灘風景⋯ 來熱浪島一定要住這裡 爽歪歪
還可以點喝紅酒在你自己的兩個私人陽台看著沙灘藍天 聽著海浪的聲音 或 賞月
要特別安排驚喜或私人沙灘浪漫晚餐也可以

Presidential Suite at @lagunaredang is THE room u should get if u visit Redang Island
TWO private balconies, FOUR personal balcony chairs and reclining chairs, TWO towel/clothes drying hanger rack, ONE big private living room with TWO big sofas, TWO big Flatscreen TV with sound system, TWO wc, a segregated shower room, and a private bathtub spa room for ur own use, your own office desk, your very own Make Up Table with plug, your own pantry, fridge, one big bed for two pax to roll around, and UNLIMITED view of the whole resort and the white sandy beach with infinity ocean line … Perfect
Ending your beautiful day with a bottle of wine overlooking the sea and listening to the soothing sound of the waves

The resort can help you organise any surprises or custom a private romantic dinner by the beach experience should u wish to celebrate any special occasions with ur loved ones

島嶼拍攝開跑啦 Diving Trip with @gopromysg @ripcurlmy @malaysia.truly.asia

23/9 - 26/9 Redang Island @lagunaredang

Booking :
+609-6310888 / +603-61421188

所有 @ripcurlmy 商品衣服包包鞋子手錶帽子配件 用姐姐名字 LENGYEIN 一律有額外折扣
Get extra discount at www.ripcurl.my with my name : LENGYEIN

@gopromysg 拍攝器材

接頭髮 Hair Extensions @mango_hairextentions

化妝品 Make up @onlykorea_asia
Discount: lengyein / lengsean

Nails extensions @m_pavillion

#LagunaRedang #LagunaRedangIslandResort #Resort #GoProHero10 #GoPro #Ripcurl #Redang #RedangIsland #CutiCutiMalaysia #PulauRedang #Terengganu

淺談「假新聞」

最近上課時學到一個新單字「positionality」，讓我想到當前社群媒體上，不停看到的「fake news」——假新聞。

簡言之，「positionality」(位置性) 被定義為於種族、階級、性別、性取向以及能力等狀態中，創造你身分的社會與政治背景。位置性還描述了你的身分如何影響你對世界的理解與看法，以及潛在的偏見。

positionality 位置性；定位
https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/3390885/
https://www.lexico.com/definition/positionality

以下是我對「positionality」與 「fake news」的些許觀點：

“Fake news” has permeated all facets of life, ranging from social media interaction to presidential elections. Fake news can be defined as “fabricated information that mimics news media content in form but not in organizational process or intent” (Lazer et al., 2018, p. 1094). The creators and outlets of fake news do not ensure the accuracy and credibility of information, but rather disseminate misinformation or disinformation for purposes ranging from personal amusement to creating deceptions to achieve political aims. At times, fake news is created and disseminated by state or non-state actors using social media accounts and networks of bots designed to hijack feed algorithms of platforms such as Twitter or Facebook (Prier, 2017, p. 54). In the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign, Facebook estimated that up to 60 million bots were used to post political content. Some of the same bots were then used in an attempt to influence the 2017 French election (Lazer et al., 2018, p. 1095). Such campaigns can be understood as a form of information warfare, a comprehensive attempt to control and influence every facet of the information supply chain, thereby influencing public opinion and behaviors. (Prier, 2017, p. 54). Often, fake news is not directly created by actors that seek to manipulate but by journalists or content creators whose content favors or aligns with the narratives of these actors (Doshi, 2020).

從社群媒體的互動到總統選舉，「假新聞」（fake news）已滲透至生活的各個層面。假新聞可被定義為「在形式上而非組織過程或意圖上，模仿新聞媒體內容所捏造的資訊」（Lazer et al., 2018, p. 1094）。無論是出於個人愛好或為達政治目的而有所欺瞞，假新聞的製造者與傳播管道並不保證資訊的準確性與可信度，反而是為了散播錯誤訊息（misinformation）或扭曲訊息（disinformation）。有時，假新聞是由國家或非國家行為者（state or non-state actors）所製造與傳播，藉由社群媒體帳號及網絡機器人來劫持諸如臉書與推特等平臺的推送演算法（Prier, 2017, p. 54）。在2016年的美國總統大選中，臉書估計有多達６千萬個機器人被用來發布政治貼文。其中，有部分機器人被用於影響隔年的法國大選（Lazer et al., 2018, p. 1095）。此類行動可視為資訊戰（information warfare）的一種形式，一種對控制與影響資訊供應鏈各環節的全面嘗試，從而影響公眾輿論與行為（Prier, 2017, p. 54）。假新聞通常是由記者或內容創造者（content creators）所創造，而非試圖操弄的行為者，前者的內容偏好符合後者的敘事（Doshi, 2020）。

Nevertheless, while the term “fake news” is commonplace, there is no universal, measurable way to quantify the fakeness or truthfulness of news. There are many fact-checking and media-bias detection tools, but they cannot objectively detect and clarify the more subtle and nuanced aims of manipulative actors that play a crucial role in news production. It can also be argued that the veracity of news depends not only on the actors that seek to manipulate it, but also on the positionality of its consumers. Therefore, one’s initial line of defense against misleading news lies not in the plethora of fact-checking devices but more in one’s pre-existing dispositions and skills to think and act in response to misleading information. This ability can be referred to as critical thinking, which can be more concretely expounded as “reasonable and reflective thinking focused on deciding what to believe or do” (Ennis, 2011, p. 15).

然而，即便「假新聞」一詞隨處可見，卻沒有統一、可衡量的方式來量化新聞的虛假性或真實性。目前有許多事實查核與媒體偏見檢測工具，但它們無法客觀地檢測與說明行為操弄者更狡猾、更細緻的目標，而這些操弄者往往在新聞的生產中發揮著重要作用。我們也可以說，新聞的真實性不僅取決於試圖操弄它的行為者，同時還取決於新聞受眾的位置性。因此，一個人對抗誤導性新聞的第一道防線，不在於這些五花八門的事實查核方式，反而在於個人所固有的性格，以及針對誤導性資訊的思考與行動等相關技能。這種能力可稱為批判性思考（critical thinking），意即「專注於決定相信什麼或做什麼的理性思考與反思性思考」（Ennis, 2011, p. 15）。

Taiwan, also known as the Republic of China (ROC), is at the forefront of information warfare. It is wedged between the geopolitical struggles of global and regional hegemonies such as the United States and China, the People's Republic of China (PRC). Compounding the matter are the Taiwan’s own political actors vying for influence and power. This struggle seeps into all aspects of life and practice, mainly manifesting itself on social media, a battleground of information warfare. The Ministry of Education of Taiwan is cognizant of these information campaigns, and efforts have been made to introduce media literacy into all parts of its education system. According to the ministry, the government has tried to promote media literacy education since 2000 (MOE, 2002, p. 1), with one of its primary goals to cultivate its “citizens” abilities for independent learning, critical thinking, and problem solving” (MOE, 2002, p. 2).

臺灣，也被稱為中華民國，正處於資訊戰的最前線。這是全球霸權與地區霸權之間——如美國與中國（中華人民共和國）——的地緣政治對抗。使問題惡化的是臺灣自身的政治行動者對影響力與權力的奪取。這場對抗遍布於現實生活的各個面向，主要於社群媒體中——資訊戰的戰場——展露無遺。臺灣的教育部注意到了這些資訊的煙硝，並已努力將媒體素養引入其教育體系。據該部稱，自2000年以來，政府一直試圖推展媒體素養教育（MOE, 2002, p. 1），其主要目標之一是培養「公民獨立學習、批判性思考以及解決問題的能力。」（MOE, 2002, p. 2）。

★★★★★★★★★★★★

上述段落認為，由於個人的位置性(positionality)，「假新聞」極難定義。此外，有許多人把不符合自身成見與偏好的新聞逕斥為假新聞。這其實相當危險，因為個人觀點將會變得愈發孤立與激進。

閱聽人應意識到，他們在網路上看到的每個資訊都有特定立場。是否真有毫無立場的新聞文章？為了對抗操弄性或強制性資訊（coercive information），我們必須意識到權力於個中的作用，以及我們自身的位置性如何形塑我們的詮釋。這是我們的第一道防線。

★★★★★★★★★★★★

參考文獻

Doshi, R. (2020, January). China steps up its information war in Taiwan. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved March, 21, 2021, from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2020-01-09/china-steps-its-information-war-taiwan

Ennis, R. H. (1985). A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational leadership, 43(2), 44-48.

Lazer, D. M., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., ... & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094-1096.

MOE (Ministry of Education), Taiwan. (2002). White paper on media literacy educational policy. Retrieved March, 21, 2021, from http://english.moe.gov.tw/public/Attachment/ 2122416591771.pdf

Prier, J. (2017). Commanding the trend: Social media as information warfare. Strategic Studies Quarterly: SSQ, 11(4), 50-85.

★★★★★★★★★★★★

教育時評: http://bit.ly/39ABON9

相關詞彙: https://bit.ly/2UncrfI

TED相關影片: https://bit.ly/3BDsDKl

Jenna Cody :

Is Taiwan a real China?
No, and with the exception of a few intervening decades - here’s the part that’ll surprise you - it never has been.

This’ll blow your mind too: that it never has been doesn’t matter.

So let’s start with what doesn’t actually matter.

Until the 1600s, Taiwan was indigenous. Indigenous Taiwanese are not Chinese, they’re Austronesian. Then it was a Dutch colony (note: I do not say “it was Dutch”, I say it was a Dutch colony). Then it was taken over by Ming loyalists at the end of the Ming dynasty (the Ming loyalists were breakaways, not a part of the new Qing court. Any overlap in Ming rule and Ming loyalist conquest of Taiwan was so brief as to be inconsequential).

Only then, in the late 1600s, was it taken over by the Chinese (Qing). But here’s the thing, it was more like a colony of the Qing, treated as - to use Emma Teng’s wording in Taiwan’s Imagined Geography - a barrier or barricade keeping the ‘real’ Qing China safe. In fact, the Qing didn’t even want Taiwan at first, the emperor called it “a ball of mud beyond the pale of civilization”. Prior to that, and to a great extent at that time, there was no concept on the part of China that Taiwan was Chinese, even though Chinese immigrants began moving to Taiwan under Dutch colonial rule (mostly encouraged by the Dutch, to work as laborers). When the Spanish landed in the north of Taiwan, it was the Dutch, not the Chinese, who kicked them out.

Under Qing colonial rule - and yes, I am choosing my words carefully - China only controlled the Western half of Taiwan. They didn’t even have maps for the eastern half. That’s how uninterested in it they were. I can’t say that the Qing controlled “Taiwan”, they only had power over part of it.

Note that the Qing were Manchu, which at the time of their conquest had not been a part of China: China itself essentially became a Manchu imperial holding, and Taiwan did as well, once they were convinced it was not a “ball of mud” but actually worth taking. Taiwan was not treated the same way as the rest of “Qing China”, and was not administered as a province until (I believe) 1887. So that’s around 200 years of Taiwan being a colony of the Qing.

What happened in the late 19th century to change China’s mind? Japan. A Japanese ship was shipwrecked in eastern Taiwan in the 1870s, and the crew was killed by hostile indigenous people in what is known as the Mudan Incident. A Japanese emissary mission went to China to inquire about what could be done, only to be told that China had no control there and if they went to eastern Taiwan, they did so at their own peril. China had not intended to imply that Taiwan wasn’t theirs, but they did. Japan - and other foreign powers, as France also attempted an invasion - were showing an interest in Taiwan, so China decided to cement its claim, started mapping the entire island, and made it a province.

So, I suppose for a decade or so Taiwan was a part of China. A China that no longer exists.

It remained a province until 1895, when it was ceded to Japan after the (first) Sino-Japanese War. Before that could happen, Taiwan declared itself a Republic, although it was essentially a Qing puppet state (though the history here is interesting - correspondence at the time indicates that the leaders of this ‘Republic of Taiwan’ considered themselves Chinese, and the tiger flag hints at this as well. However, the constitution was a very republican document, not something you’d expect to see in Qing-era China.) That lasted for less than a year, when the Japanese took it by force.

This is important for two reasons - the first is that some interpretations of IR theory state that when a colonial holding is released, it should revert to the state it was in before it was taken as a colony. In this case, that would actually be The Republic of Taiwan, not Qing-era China. Secondly, it puts to rest all notions that there was no Taiwan autonomy movement prior to 1947.

In any case, it would be impossible to revert to its previous state, as the government that controlled it - the Qing empire - no longer exists. The current government of China - the PRC - has never controlled it.

After the Japanese colonial era, there is a whole web of treaties and agreements that do not satisfactorily settle the status of Taiwan. None of them actually do so - those which explicitly state that Taiwan is to be given to the Republic of China (such as the Cairo declaration) are non-binding. Those that are binding do not settle the status of Taiwan (neither the treaty of San Francisco nor the Treaty of Taipei definitively say that Taiwan is a part of China, or even which China it is - the Treaty of Taipei sets out what nationality the Taiwanese are to be considered, but that doesn’t determine territorial claims). Treaty-wise, the status of Taiwan is “undetermined”.

Under more modern interpretations, what a state needs to be a state is…lessee…a contiguous territory, a government, a military, a currency…maybe I’m forgetting something, but Taiwan has all of it. For all intents and purposes it is independent already.

In fact, in the time when all of these agreements were made, the Allied powers weren’t as sure as you might have learned about what to do with Taiwan. They weren’t a big fan of Chiang Kai-shek, didn’t want it to go Communist, and discussed an Allied trusteeship (which would have led to independence) or backing local autonomy movements (which did exist). That it became what it did - “the ROC” but not China - was an accident (as Hsiao-ting Lin lays out in Accidental State).

In fact, the KMT knew this, and at the time the foreign minister (George Yeh) stated something to the effect that they were aware they were ‘squatters’ in Taiwan.

Since then, it’s true that the ROC claims to be the rightful government of Taiwan, however, that hardly matters when considering the future of Taiwan simply because they have no choice. To divest themselves of all such claims (and, presumably, change their name) would be considered by the PRC to be a declaration of formal independence. So that they have not done so is not a sign that they wish to retain the claim, merely that they wish to avoid a war.

It’s also true that most Taiwanese are ethnically “Han” (alongside indigenous and Hakka, although Hakka are, according to many, technically Han…but I don’t think that’s relevant here). But biology is not destiny: what ethnicity someone is shouldn’t determine what government they must be ruled by.

Through all of this, the Taiwanese have evolved their own culture, identity and sense of history. They are diverse in a way unique to Taiwan, having been a part of Austronesian and later Hoklo trade routes through Southeast Asia for millenia. Now, one in five (I’ve heard one in four, actually) Taiwanese children has a foreign parent. The Taiwanese language (which is not Mandarin - that’s a KMT transplant language forced on Taiwanese) is gaining popularity as people discover their history. Visiting Taiwan and China, it is clear where the cultural differences are, not least in terms of civic engagement. This morning, a group of legislators were removed after a weekend-long pro-labor hunger strike in front of the presidential palace. They were not arrested and will not be. Right now, a group of pro-labor protesters is lying down on the tracks at Taipei Main Station to protest the new labor law amendments.

This would never be allowed in China, but Taiwanese take it as a fiercely-guarded basic right.

*

Now, as I said, none of this matters.

What matters is self-determination. If you believe in democracy, you believe that every state (and Taiwan does fit the definition of a state) that wants to be democratic - that already is democratic and wishes to remain that way - has the right to self-determination. In fact, every nation does. You cannot be pro-democracy and also believe that it is acceptable to deprive people of this right, especially if they already have it.

Taiwan is already a democracy. That means it has the right to determine its own future. Period.

Even under the ROC, Taiwan was not allowed to determine its future. The KMT just arrived from China and claimed it. The Taiwanese were never asked if they consented. What do we call it when a foreign government arrives in land they had not previously governed and declares itself the legitimate governing power of that land without the consent of the local people? We call that colonialism.

Under this definition, the ROC can also be said to be a colonial power in Taiwan. They forced Mandarin - previously not a language native to Taiwan - onto the people, taught Chinese history, geography and culture, and insisted that the Taiwanese learn they were Chinese - not Taiwanese (and certainly not Japanese). This was forced on them. It was not chosen. Some, for awhile, swallowed it. Many didn’t. The independence movement only grew, and truly blossomed after democratization - something the Taiwanese fought for and won, not something handed to them by the KMT.

So what matters is what the Taiwanese want, not what the ROC is forced to claim. I cannot stress this enough - if you do not believe Taiwan has the right to this, you do not believe in democracy.

And poll after poll shows it: Taiwanese identify more as Taiwanese than Chinese (those who identify as both primarily identify as Taiwanese, just as I identify as American and Armenian, but primarily as American. Armenian is merely my ethnicity). They overwhelmingly support not unifying with China. The vast majority who support the status quo support one that leads to eventual de jure independence, not unification. The status quo is not - and cannot be - an endgame (if only because China has declared so, but also because it is untenable). Less than 10% want unification. Only a small number (a very small minority) would countenance unification in the future…even if China were to democratize.

The issue isn’t the incompatibility of the systems - it’s that the Taiwanese fundamentally do not see themselves as Chinese.

A change in China’s system won’t change that. It’s not an ethnic nationalism - there is no ethnic argument for Taiwan (or any nation - didn’t we learn in the 20th century what ethnicity-based nation-building leads to? Nothing good). It’s not a jingoistic or xenophobic nationalism - Taiwanese know that to be dangerous. It’s a nationalism based on shared identity, culture, history and civics. The healthiest kind of nationalism there is. Taiwan exists because the Taiwanese identify with it. Period.

There are debates about how long the status quo should go on, and what we should risk to insist on formal recognition. However, the question of whether or not to be Taiwan, not China…

…well, that’s already settled.

The Taiwanese have spoken and they are not Chinese.

Whatever y’all think about that doesn’t matter. That’s what they want, and if you believe in self-determination you will respect it.

If you don’t, good luck with your authoritarian nonsense, but Taiwan wants nothing to do with it.

今日（11月3號）就係美國總統大選嘅日子。我哋校園電視同時委會合力製作「美國大選知多啲」短片，有幸邀請到港大政治及公共行政學系教授李詠怡同我哋解釋下美國總統嘅選舉制度，同埋今次選舉對香港嘅影響。

0:00 簡介
0:30 美國總統選舉制度
3:26 兩黨制之下的票源分布
5:36 採用現時選舉制度的歷史原因
7:48 兩大候選人的對華政策

*訪問中加插的圖像或片段與嘉賓立場無關

The United States Presidential Election is to be held today (3 November). We have collaborated with The Current Affairs Committee of HKUSU Council to produce this video. We are honoured to have Professor Elisa Lee to explain the electoral system of the United States as well as the impact the election has on Hong Kong.

0:00 Intro
0:30 US Presidential electoral system
3:26 Voting patterns under the two-party system
5:36 Historical reason for adopting the current electoral system
7:48 Two main candidates' China policies

Images inserted in the interview video do not represent the stance of the interviewee

Follow Us for Latest Update
--------------------------------
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hkucampustv
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/campustv_hkusu
Twitter: https://twitter.com/campustv_hkusu

Our Website
--------------------------------
https://campustv.hkusu.hku.hk

Our Merch: https://standard.tv/kentobento
Our Patreon: https://patreon.com/kentobento

Nebula: https://watchnebula.com/kentobento
Twitter: https://twitter.com/kentobento2015
Business Inquiries: kentobento@standard.tv

Download Dashlane for free to manage all your passwords: https://dashlane.com/kentobento
Use the promo code "KENTOBENTO" to get 10% off Dashlane Premium.

Other videos you may like:
The Incredible Japanese Prison Break: https://youtu.be/oI8trlbCbU8
Has KFC Conquered Asia?: https://youtu.be/4iYt9eINS8M
The Greatest Bank Heist in Chinese History: https://youtu.be/qW0uzPJEO10
Where Are The Asian Borders?: https://youtu.be/vPupwlZlNMY
These Events Will Happen in Asia in 2019: https://youtu.be/HkUksxJrdmc

Stock Media Footage:
Videoblocks: https://www.videoblocks.com

Music:
Epidemic Sound: http://epidemicsound.com

Channel Description:
Animated documentary-style videos on extraordinary Asian events.

Credits:
Kento Bento — Researcher, writer, narrator, audio editor, video editor, motion graphics & art director
Charlie Rodriguez — Illustrator
Isambard Dexter — Research assistant
Jorrit van Ginkel — Music assistant
Nina Bento — Cheerleader

Video Title: These Events Will Happen in Asia in 2020 (part 1)

"As you probably know, this video will be different from normal, because it won’t just be about one event, but multiple events in the near future, all happening in Asia in 2020. Now of course predicting such events month-by-month is extremely difficult, but we can always give our best estimates based on the information we currently have."

In this video, we cover some of the following:
- Burj Khalifa, Al Marjan Island & fireworks (UAE)
- Kim Jong-un New Year's Address (North Korea)
- Xi Jinping's battle with Winnie the Pooh (China)
- Taiwan & China's conflict
- Hong Kong protests
- South China Sea Dispute between China & ASEAN
- Mekong River dams (Laos)
- Mount Everest landfill (Nepal)
- Indian's water crisis
- World's highest bridge (Kashmir)
- Beidou Satellite System (China)
- Fastest train in the world (China)
- The new Japanese Emperor
- Central Asia & Lonely Planet
- Bhutan & phalli
- Andrew Yang in the Democratic presidential primaries
- BTS and mandatory military service (South Korea)
- US' Huawei Ban
- Azerbaijan's first lady and vice president
- Tajikistan's very tasty president
- ABU International Song Contest (China)
- China's Beidou Satellite System

+ more!

這是莫洛西亞共和國，位於美國內華達州境內，自1977年5月26日宣布主權獨立的國家。總統是Kevin Baugh 一位非常酷的總統，他在國家境內建造許多設施，也在外交上建立了許多私人國家盟友（就是同在其他國境內的私人主權國家）
在2018年5月26日的國慶日當天，Kevin總統作為一日導遊，介紹國內的設施景點，境內有建造海關，郵局，銀行（甚至發行自己的貨幣＿法洛拉幣Valora，1 法洛拉幣為0.75美元），總統會客室（裡面還真的有與各國元首的合照），國家貿易公司（大部分都是賣總統的肖像照），酒吧（居然比銀行還大），還有監獄（世界最小的監獄）。除此之外，還有火車站系統，還有最特殊的莫洛西亞香蕉樹（居然是往上生長的香蕉）。
最驚奇的是太空計畫（就是火箭的設備），現場也親自展示了發射實力。
整個導覽行程最後甚至還認真地發表了總統演說，現場也準備了國宴（BBQ PARTY）提供大家享用。
來自台灣的我，除了送見面禮給總統（故宮福籌四喜金門高粱酒），最後也送上第一夫人提提研面膜，你可以想像他們心目中對於台灣的印象一定非常好。特別在影片最後播放莫洛西亞共和國的國歌，因為音樂也是由最偉大的總統Kevin創作。
目前莫洛西亞正在與東德的戰爭還未結束，大家如果有興趣，可以去購買戰爭債券來幫助停止戰爭。

今年，依舊只開放7天，歡迎大家也可以去看看這個全世界最小的微型國家也親自見到最酷的總統。記得先上官網去預約到訪時間喔!!!
http://www.molossia.org/

p.s 影片前段的介紹畫面是來自其他的媒體資料影片，如果有侵權請讓我知道，會馬上下架此影片。

This is the Republic of Molossia, a country in Nevada, the USA that declared sovereign independence on May 26, 1977. The President is Kevin Baugh, a very cool president who has built many facilities in the country and has also established many private national allies (that is, private sovereign states in other countries).
On the National Day of May 26, 2018, President Kevin introduced as a day tour guide to the domestic facilities and attractions, including the construction of customs, post offices, banks (even issuing their own currency _ Valora The currency is $0.75), the presidential meeting room (there is really a photo with the heads of state), the national trading company (mostly the portrait of the president), the bar (which is bigger than the bank), and the prison ( The world's smallest prison). In addition to this, there is the train station system, as well as the most special Molossia banana tree (which is actually a banana-growing up).
The most amazing thing is the space program (the rocket's equipment), and the site also personally demonstrated the launching power.
At the end of the tour, he even gave a serious speech. The venue also prepared a national banquet (BBQ PARTY) for everyone to enjoy.
From Taiwan, I sent a face-to-face ceremony to the President (sorghum wine) and finally sent the first lady the TTM Mask, you can imagine their impression of Taiwan must be very good. Especially at the end of the film, the national anthem of the Republic of Molossia was played, because the music was also created by the greatest president, Kevin.
At present, the war between Molossia and East Germany is not over. If you are interested, you can buy war bonds to help stop the war.

This year, it is still only open for 7 days. You are welcome to check out the world's smallest country and see the coolest president. Remember to go to the official website to make an appointment to visit the time!!!
Http://www.molossia.org/

P.s The introduction screen of the front part of the film is from other media materials. If there is any infringement, please let me know and I will immediately remove this video.

Check out 🤘
👽酷奇王 FB https://goo.gl/vYfSEk
👽酷奇王 IG @afropopcorn
https://www.instagram.com/afropopcorn/