昨天妹妹在土耳其愛琴海Fethiye區域,人生第一次跳飛行傘!而且在2000公尺高度時把中華民國台灣的國旗拿出來,為我們的國手打氣!🇹🇼💪
早上老婆給女兒們看奧運開幕典禮一些精彩畫面,台灣隊進場的時候,大女兒Ekim 問媽媽:我們國旗呢?
其實這件事背後的歷史過程對5歲的小朋友來說很難理解。不過我孩子也已經知道國旗是什麼,那一個是台灣,那一個是土耳其等等。
國際舞台上每次看到Chinese Taipei 時,我也會難過,希望我們國手拿國旗,然後用台灣這個名字來參加任何一個活動。所以我每次遇到不認識台灣的外國人,一定會跟他們介紹台灣跟屬於我們的特色,包含語言、文化、美食、景點等等。
謝謝妹妹在美麗的土耳其空中,把台灣的國旗拿起來給大家看❤️ 而且她還錄影整個過程,我很快把整支影片波在我的YT 跟FB 粉絲頁❤️
我的台灣🇹🇼我的驕傲✌🏻I am proud of being part of Taiwan,my lovely sister gave us a very lovely surprise from Turkey Mediterranean Sea Fethiye region with a flag of Republic of China / TAIWAN 😍
同時也有5部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過3,430的網紅澎遊誌【XieAerial】,也在其Youtube影片中提到,【🎵 聆聽好音樂】【 🎧 建議戴耳機】 台灣真的很美,可惜沒有辦法一一去走遍。 Jerry嘗試做一系列以空拍台灣為主軸的影片,紀錄台灣的美,希望各位觀賞之餘也能不嗇給點建議好讓我慢慢改進,謝謝。 【使用之影片素材為 2020/3/31前合法拍攝 】 ------------------------...
「republic of china flag」的推薦目錄:
- 關於republic of china flag 在 Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於republic of china flag 在 Focus Taiwan Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於republic of china flag 在 Mordeth13 Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於republic of china flag 在 澎遊誌【XieAerial】 Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於republic of china flag 在 Corinne Vigniel Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於republic of china flag 在 一二三渡辺 Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於republic of china flag 在 National Flag Anthem of the Republic of China | 中華民國國旗歌 的評價
- 關於republic of china flag 在 National Flag of the People's Republic of China. Chinese flag ... 的評價
republic of china flag 在 Focus Taiwan Facebook 的最佳貼文
[PHOTO] The Republic of China (Taiwan) flag is flown at half-mast at the Executive Yuan on Saturday to mourn the dozens of people who died in a train crash in Hualien the previous day. CNA photo April 3, 2021 #TarokoExpress #HalfMast
https://focustaiwan.tw/photos/20210403ENP0001m
republic of china flag 在 Mordeth13 Facebook 的精選貼文
Jenna Cody :
Is Taiwan a real China?
No, and with the exception of a few intervening decades - here’s the part that’ll surprise you - it never has been.
This’ll blow your mind too: that it never has been doesn’t matter.
So let’s start with what doesn’t actually matter.
Until the 1600s, Taiwan was indigenous. Indigenous Taiwanese are not Chinese, they’re Austronesian. Then it was a Dutch colony (note: I do not say “it was Dutch”, I say it was a Dutch colony). Then it was taken over by Ming loyalists at the end of the Ming dynasty (the Ming loyalists were breakaways, not a part of the new Qing court. Any overlap in Ming rule and Ming loyalist conquest of Taiwan was so brief as to be inconsequential).
Only then, in the late 1600s, was it taken over by the Chinese (Qing). But here’s the thing, it was more like a colony of the Qing, treated as - to use Emma Teng’s wording in Taiwan’s Imagined Geography - a barrier or barricade keeping the ‘real’ Qing China safe. In fact, the Qing didn’t even want Taiwan at first, the emperor called it “a ball of mud beyond the pale of civilization”. Prior to that, and to a great extent at that time, there was no concept on the part of China that Taiwan was Chinese, even though Chinese immigrants began moving to Taiwan under Dutch colonial rule (mostly encouraged by the Dutch, to work as laborers). When the Spanish landed in the north of Taiwan, it was the Dutch, not the Chinese, who kicked them out.
Under Qing colonial rule - and yes, I am choosing my words carefully - China only controlled the Western half of Taiwan. They didn’t even have maps for the eastern half. That’s how uninterested in it they were. I can’t say that the Qing controlled “Taiwan”, they only had power over part of it.
Note that the Qing were Manchu, which at the time of their conquest had not been a part of China: China itself essentially became a Manchu imperial holding, and Taiwan did as well, once they were convinced it was not a “ball of mud” but actually worth taking. Taiwan was not treated the same way as the rest of “Qing China”, and was not administered as a province until (I believe) 1887. So that’s around 200 years of Taiwan being a colony of the Qing.
What happened in the late 19th century to change China’s mind? Japan. A Japanese ship was shipwrecked in eastern Taiwan in the 1870s, and the crew was killed by hostile indigenous people in what is known as the Mudan Incident. A Japanese emissary mission went to China to inquire about what could be done, only to be told that China had no control there and if they went to eastern Taiwan, they did so at their own peril. China had not intended to imply that Taiwan wasn’t theirs, but they did. Japan - and other foreign powers, as France also attempted an invasion - were showing an interest in Taiwan, so China decided to cement its claim, started mapping the entire island, and made it a province.
So, I suppose for a decade or so Taiwan was a part of China. A China that no longer exists.
It remained a province until 1895, when it was ceded to Japan after the (first) Sino-Japanese War. Before that could happen, Taiwan declared itself a Republic, although it was essentially a Qing puppet state (though the history here is interesting - correspondence at the time indicates that the leaders of this ‘Republic of Taiwan’ considered themselves Chinese, and the tiger flag hints at this as well. However, the constitution was a very republican document, not something you’d expect to see in Qing-era China.) That lasted for less than a year, when the Japanese took it by force.
This is important for two reasons - the first is that some interpretations of IR theory state that when a colonial holding is released, it should revert to the state it was in before it was taken as a colony. In this case, that would actually be The Republic of Taiwan, not Qing-era China. Secondly, it puts to rest all notions that there was no Taiwan autonomy movement prior to 1947.
In any case, it would be impossible to revert to its previous state, as the government that controlled it - the Qing empire - no longer exists. The current government of China - the PRC - has never controlled it.
After the Japanese colonial era, there is a whole web of treaties and agreements that do not satisfactorily settle the status of Taiwan. None of them actually do so - those which explicitly state that Taiwan is to be given to the Republic of China (such as the Cairo declaration) are non-binding. Those that are binding do not settle the status of Taiwan (neither the treaty of San Francisco nor the Treaty of Taipei definitively say that Taiwan is a part of China, or even which China it is - the Treaty of Taipei sets out what nationality the Taiwanese are to be considered, but that doesn’t determine territorial claims). Treaty-wise, the status of Taiwan is “undetermined”.
Under more modern interpretations, what a state needs to be a state is…lessee…a contiguous territory, a government, a military, a currency…maybe I’m forgetting something, but Taiwan has all of it. For all intents and purposes it is independent already.
In fact, in the time when all of these agreements were made, the Allied powers weren’t as sure as you might have learned about what to do with Taiwan. They weren’t a big fan of Chiang Kai-shek, didn’t want it to go Communist, and discussed an Allied trusteeship (which would have led to independence) or backing local autonomy movements (which did exist). That it became what it did - “the ROC” but not China - was an accident (as Hsiao-ting Lin lays out in Accidental State).
In fact, the KMT knew this, and at the time the foreign minister (George Yeh) stated something to the effect that they were aware they were ‘squatters’ in Taiwan.
Since then, it’s true that the ROC claims to be the rightful government of Taiwan, however, that hardly matters when considering the future of Taiwan simply because they have no choice. To divest themselves of all such claims (and, presumably, change their name) would be considered by the PRC to be a declaration of formal independence. So that they have not done so is not a sign that they wish to retain the claim, merely that they wish to avoid a war.
It’s also true that most Taiwanese are ethnically “Han” (alongside indigenous and Hakka, although Hakka are, according to many, technically Han…but I don’t think that’s relevant here). But biology is not destiny: what ethnicity someone is shouldn’t determine what government they must be ruled by.
Through all of this, the Taiwanese have evolved their own culture, identity and sense of history. They are diverse in a way unique to Taiwan, having been a part of Austronesian and later Hoklo trade routes through Southeast Asia for millenia. Now, one in five (I’ve heard one in four, actually) Taiwanese children has a foreign parent. The Taiwanese language (which is not Mandarin - that’s a KMT transplant language forced on Taiwanese) is gaining popularity as people discover their history. Visiting Taiwan and China, it is clear where the cultural differences are, not least in terms of civic engagement. This morning, a group of legislators were removed after a weekend-long pro-labor hunger strike in front of the presidential palace. They were not arrested and will not be. Right now, a group of pro-labor protesters is lying down on the tracks at Taipei Main Station to protest the new labor law amendments.
This would never be allowed in China, but Taiwanese take it as a fiercely-guarded basic right.
*
Now, as I said, none of this matters.
What matters is self-determination. If you believe in democracy, you believe that every state (and Taiwan does fit the definition of a state) that wants to be democratic - that already is democratic and wishes to remain that way - has the right to self-determination. In fact, every nation does. You cannot be pro-democracy and also believe that it is acceptable to deprive people of this right, especially if they already have it.
Taiwan is already a democracy. That means it has the right to determine its own future. Period.
Even under the ROC, Taiwan was not allowed to determine its future. The KMT just arrived from China and claimed it. The Taiwanese were never asked if they consented. What do we call it when a foreign government arrives in land they had not previously governed and declares itself the legitimate governing power of that land without the consent of the local people? We call that colonialism.
Under this definition, the ROC can also be said to be a colonial power in Taiwan. They forced Mandarin - previously not a language native to Taiwan - onto the people, taught Chinese history, geography and culture, and insisted that the Taiwanese learn they were Chinese - not Taiwanese (and certainly not Japanese). This was forced on them. It was not chosen. Some, for awhile, swallowed it. Many didn’t. The independence movement only grew, and truly blossomed after democratization - something the Taiwanese fought for and won, not something handed to them by the KMT.
So what matters is what the Taiwanese want, not what the ROC is forced to claim. I cannot stress this enough - if you do not believe Taiwan has the right to this, you do not believe in democracy.
And poll after poll shows it: Taiwanese identify more as Taiwanese than Chinese (those who identify as both primarily identify as Taiwanese, just as I identify as American and Armenian, but primarily as American. Armenian is merely my ethnicity). They overwhelmingly support not unifying with China. The vast majority who support the status quo support one that leads to eventual de jure independence, not unification. The status quo is not - and cannot be - an endgame (if only because China has declared so, but also because it is untenable). Less than 10% want unification. Only a small number (a very small minority) would countenance unification in the future…even if China were to democratize.
The issue isn’t the incompatibility of the systems - it’s that the Taiwanese fundamentally do not see themselves as Chinese.
A change in China’s system won’t change that. It’s not an ethnic nationalism - there is no ethnic argument for Taiwan (or any nation - didn’t we learn in the 20th century what ethnicity-based nation-building leads to? Nothing good). It’s not a jingoistic or xenophobic nationalism - Taiwanese know that to be dangerous. It’s a nationalism based on shared identity, culture, history and civics. The healthiest kind of nationalism there is. Taiwan exists because the Taiwanese identify with it. Period.
There are debates about how long the status quo should go on, and what we should risk to insist on formal recognition. However, the question of whether or not to be Taiwan, not China…
…well, that’s already settled.
The Taiwanese have spoken and they are not Chinese.
Whatever y’all think about that doesn’t matter. That’s what they want, and if you believe in self-determination you will respect it.
If you don’t, good luck with your authoritarian nonsense, but Taiwan wants nothing to do with it.
republic of china flag 在 澎遊誌【XieAerial】 Youtube 的最佳解答
【🎵 聆聽好音樂】【 🎧 建議戴耳機】
台灣真的很美,可惜沒有辦法一一去走遍。
Jerry嘗試做一系列以空拍台灣為主軸的影片,紀錄台灣的美,希望各位觀賞之餘也能不嗇給點建議好讓我慢慢改進,謝謝。
【使用之影片素材為 2020/3/31前合法拍攝 】
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
此頻道主要經營以旅遊、登山、空拍的主題影片。
喜歡請一定要訂閱加小鈴鐺,這樣有更新才會被通知。
其他影片 𝑴𝒐𝒓𝒆 | https://reurl.cc/lVYLlA
贊助我 𝑫𝒐𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒆 | https://p.ecpay.com.tw/80251
𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐚 🌄 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐥 & 📷 𝐀𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐥 & ⛺️ 𝐇𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐥.
𝐈𝐟 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐢𝐭, 𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐨 𝐠𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐦𝐞 👍 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐠𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐦𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐚𝐬. 𝐎𝐟 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐞, 𝐬𝐮𝐛𝐬𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐛𝐞 𝐢𝐟 𝐲𝐨𝐮 💗 𝐦𝐲 𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐨!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
𝐖𝐚𝐲𝐫 |
https://soundcloud.com/wayr-music
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwlu...
https://www.facebook.com/Wayr-9111809...
𝐌𝐢𝐱𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 |
https://www.facebook.com/Mixhound
https://twitter.com/Mixhound
https://soundcloud.com/mixhound
𝗙𝗹𝗮𝗴 𝗣𝗵𝗼𝘁𝗼| https://www.stockvault.net/photo/134460/taiwan-grunge-flag#
𝗜𝗚 | https://www.instagram.com/aerial.xie/
𝗙𝗮𝗰𝗲𝗯𝗼𝗼𝗸 | https://www.facebook.com/Jerrell.taipei
#台灣美景 #空拍 #XieAerial @澎遊去哪Pon.Chill【XieAerial】
republic of china flag 在 Corinne Vigniel Youtube 的最讚貼文
Two helicopters flew flags over Victoria Harbour to mark Hong Kong's handover to China. The first helicopter dragged a large Chinese flag, while a second helicopter followed behind, with a much smaller Hong Kong flag.
I am no expert in aviation - but I expect it's quite difficult for pilots to drag a large flag under a helicopter, without it getting entangled in rotors.
July 1st, 2019 marks the 22nd anniversary of Hong Kong's handover to China amid widespread anger over a controversial extradition bill
Hong Kong 香港
Monday July 1, 2019 shortly after 8am.
Camera: Corinne Vigniel
END
republic of china flag 在 一二三渡辺 Youtube 的最讚貼文
秋の京都を満喫
大覚寺は、京都市右京区嵯峨にある、真言宗大覚寺派大本山の寺院。山号を嵯峨山と称する。本尊は不動明王を中心とする五大明王、開基は嵯峨天皇である。嵯峨天皇の離宮を寺に改めた皇室ゆかりの寺院である。また、後宇多法皇がここで院政を行うなど、日本の政治史に深い関わりをもつ寺院である。また、嵯峨天皇を流祖と仰ぐ華道嵯峨御流の総司所(家元)である[1]。
時代劇の撮影所が多い太秦の近くということもあり、寺の境内(大沢池や明智門など)は(特に時代劇の)映画やテレビなどの撮影によく使われている
舞台となった作品
映画
柳生一族の陰謀 (1978年)
武士道ブレード (1981年)
将軍家光の乱心 激突 (1989年)
陰陽師 (2001年)
テレビドラマ
柳生一族の陰謀 (1978年) 第2話「美女のいけにえ」、第3話「大奥の妖女」
忠臣蔵〜決断の時(2003年)
音楽
女ひとり(1965年)
MUSIC VIDEO
松本孝弘 「THE CHANGING」 (1999年3月25日)
EXILE ATSUSHI & 久石譲「懺悔」 (2013年10月16日)
京都府京都市右京区嵯峨大沢町4
清凉寺は、京都府京都市右京区嵯峨にある浄土宗の寺院。山号を五台山と称する。嵯峨釈迦堂の名で知られ、中世以来「融通念仏の道場」としても知られている。宗派は初め華厳宗、後に浄土宗となる。本尊は釈迦如来、開基は奝然、開山はその弟子の盛算である
京都府京都市右京区嵯峨釈迦堂藤ノ木町46
厭離庵は、京都府京都市右京区にある臨済宗天龍寺派の寺院。山号は如意山。本尊は如意輪観音。
京都府京都市右京区嵯峨二尊院門前善光寺山町2
祇王寺は、京都市右京区にある真言宗大覚寺派の仏教寺院。寺自体は尼寺である。山号は高松山。院号は往生院。本尊は大日如来。
京都府京都市右京区嵯峨鳥居本小坂町32
宝厳院は京都府京都市右京区にある臨済宗天龍寺派の寺院で天龍寺の塔頭。山号は大亀山。 庭園や建物は時代劇の撮影に使用されている。
京都府京都市右京区嵯峨天龍寺芒ノ馬場町36
https://youtu.be/zrZwYO_iGAs
republic of china flag 在 National Flag of the People's Republic of China. Chinese flag ... 的推薦與評價
Dec 20, 2019 - Illustration about National Flag of the People s Republic of China,chinese flag,300dpi,high quality,flag of china,five star flag,a symbol of ... ... <看更多>
republic of china flag 在 National Flag Anthem of the Republic of China | 中華民國國旗歌 的推薦與評價
"中華民國國旗歌. Zhōnghuá mínguó guóqí gē. National Flag Anthem of the Republic of China "Performed by Philip Sheppard / London Philharmonic ... ... <看更多>