長賜輪在蘇伊士運河擱淺後,綜合外電報導的省思:極限邊緣的船舶操縱,科學與安全之間給”人的反應”留下多少”餘裕空間?
航行員都知道:在有限水域中的船舶操縱與大洋中的船舶操縱有極大的差別,也因此而產生一些”異常反應”的專有名詞,譬如:淺水效應,岸吸/岸推,船體下坐(Squat),狗頭嗅地(Dog smelling),單俥右旋船在淺水區倒俥時之船頭可能向左,主要的原因都是來自船舶四周的海水,來不及湧入去填補船艉所造成之空穴.
也因為這個緣故,Suez Canal當局對過河船隻有一些船寬,吃水,速度上的限制.基於經濟上的考慮,可以想像這些限制都是在”水工模型”下最大化的尺度界線.(越大的船過河費越貴),然而這些都是理想環境下的科學論證,實際上船舶操縱者的精神狀態,駕駛台的氣氛環境,外界視線,無線電之干擾,Marlboro菸未如預期,住艙走廊上”波斯市場”的氛圍….都在影響著”駕駛台資源管理(BRM)”,而使得船舶之實際Performance遊走在”紅線”邊緣,更糟的是一但越過紅線(Point of non-return),情況就越來越糟,猶如在山脊上騎腳踏車.
這次的重大意外,在檢討”船舶因素”之外,蘇伊士運河當局也應該重新考慮”紅線邊緣的緩衝區”是否應適度放寬,以因應船舶無止境的大型化,因應極端氣候下的異常天氣,因應新世代船員之特性,另外也可考慮在駕駛台放一箱Marlboro,讓有需要的人看自己包包大小量力自取,畢竟比起全球供應鏈上的損失,這都是微不足道的”潤滑油”.不是嗎?
The Suez Canal Authority occasionally brings out updated tables of width and acceptable draft for ships. Currently the permissible limits for suezmax ships are 20.1 m (66 ft) of draught with the beam no wider than 50 m (164.0 ft), or 12.2 m (40 ft) of draught with maximum allowed beam of 77.5 m (254 ft). Due to their design and size, a large number of ports around the world can accommodate suezmax vessels.
17,65 56,96
, a new set is being built for vessels as large as 366 meters in length, 49 meters in beam and 15.2 meters in draft at tropical frvessel.
That would have surpassed the speed limit of about 7.6 knots (8.7 miles an hour) to 8.6 knots that is listed as the maximum speed vessels are “allowed to transit” through the canal, according to the Suez authority’s rules of navigation handbook posted on its website. Captains interviewed for this story said it can pay to increase the speed in the face of a strong wind to maneuver the ship better.
“Speeding up to a certain point is effective,” said Chris Gillard, who was captain of a 300-meter container ship that crossed the Suez monthly for nearly a decade until 2019. “More than that and it becomes counter effective because the bow will get sucked down deep into the water. Then, adding too much power does nothing but exacerbate the problem.”
“You might find yourself positioning the ship in one direction, and you’re actually moving in another direction,” said Kinsey. “There’s a very fine line between having enough speed to maneuver and not having too much speed that the air and hydrodynamics become unstable. Any deviation can get real bad real quick because it’s so tight.”
The accident will be a missed opportunity if the industry doesn’t adapt, he said. “There will be vessels larger than this one that will be going through the Suez,” he said. “The next incident will be worse.”
• The Ever Given's speed was 13.5 knots before it ran aground, The Japan Times reported.
•
• Bloomberg reported the Suez Canal speed limit was between 7.6 knots and 8.6 knots.
The Ever Given didn't have a tugboat escort through the canal, according to Bloomberg. The two ships immediately ahead of it reportedly had escorts, although such escorts were not required.
同時也有5部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過8萬的網紅Moto Lê,也在其Youtube影片中提到,150cc giá 30tr 200cc giá 34tr 250cc giá 36tr 350cc 2 xi lanh + két nước giá 54tr. Tất cả đều No pp Hãng sx Zongshen. Thời gian đặt hàng khoảng 20 ngày...
ship accident 在 Facebook 的最讚貼文
總部位於米蘭的國際知名藝術雜誌 Mousse在第 74 期發表對於台灣山海、歷史與藝術創作之間,如何交互連結的的綜觀,並映照出人類社會當下的普世行為。文章來自定居台北的 Robin Peckham ( Taipei Dangdai台北當代聯合總監),揉合「在現場」與「文化不同源」的視角,在海洋史的向度上延展及連結思考。
「為了讀懂藝術家辯證台灣山海關係的作品,或是透過台灣來讀懂藝術與山海,我想到了兩種廣泛的分類及比喻:一種是發散、多向的思維,另一種是純物質的;一種是文化層面,另一種是生物性的;一種看向南方與東方,回溯政治策略與古航海家的路線,另一種則看進地球的深處,充分檢驗岩層的堅硬與海水的濕度。」
本篇論述了下列藝術家:
Meuko Meuko | NAXS corp. | #黃嘉俊 | #劉芸怡 | #倪灝 | #蔡佳葳 | #許家維 | #洪子建 | #區秀詒 | #張永達 | #蘇郁心 | #蘇匯宇 Su Hui-Yu | #吳其育 | 姚瑞中 Yao Jui chung | #羅智信 | #楊順發 | #盧昱瑞 | #林銓居 | #吳季璁 | #CemelesaiTakivalet #達給伐歷 | #AruwaiKaumaka #武玉玲
「如果說這篇文章道出了任何一種普世性,那即是以欲望為溫床、萌生於生態自然中的意識。山與海並不主動提供故事的素材,而是山海作為根本之物,成為被述說、被詮釋的對象。」
🔵
▍This Piece of Land, These Bits of Sea ▍
The 74th issue of Milan-based, internationally-renowned art journal Mousse
Magazine features a survey on the interrelationships of Taiwan’s land- and seascapes, history and artistic practices, while shedding light on current global human conditions. The article by Taipei-based Robin Peckham, Taipei Dangdai co-director, sets out from the realm of maritime history, intersecting the perspectives of the in-situ with culturally diverse lineages to bridge and extend such reflections.
"In attempting to read and understand works (like these) that engage the land-sea dialectic over and through Taiwan, I have come across two broad categories. One is discursive where the other is material; one is cultural where the other is biological. One looks south and east, following policy and retracing the routes of ancient seafarers, while the other looks down, testing out the hardness of rock and the wetness of water."
The article discusses works from the following artists:
Meuko Meuko | NAXS corp. | #HuangChiachun | #YunyiLiu | #NiHao | #CharweiTsai | #HsuChiaWei | #JamesTHong | #AuSowYee | #ChangYungTa | #SuYuHsin | #SuHuiYu | #WuChiYu | #YaoJuiChung |
#LuoJrShin | #YangShunFa | #LuYuJui | #LinChuanChu | #WuChiTsung | #CemelesaiTakivalet | #AruwaiKaumaka
“If there is a universalism to be discovered here, it is in the ecological nature of the consciousness that is created in this matrix of desires. Mountains and seas do not provide source matter for stories but rather become the very substrate of what can be said.“
台灣美術雙年展 Taiwan Biennial2020
ship accident 在 Mordeth13 Facebook 的最佳貼文
Jenna Cody :
Is Taiwan a real China?
No, and with the exception of a few intervening decades - here’s the part that’ll surprise you - it never has been.
This’ll blow your mind too: that it never has been doesn’t matter.
So let’s start with what doesn’t actually matter.
Until the 1600s, Taiwan was indigenous. Indigenous Taiwanese are not Chinese, they’re Austronesian. Then it was a Dutch colony (note: I do not say “it was Dutch”, I say it was a Dutch colony). Then it was taken over by Ming loyalists at the end of the Ming dynasty (the Ming loyalists were breakaways, not a part of the new Qing court. Any overlap in Ming rule and Ming loyalist conquest of Taiwan was so brief as to be inconsequential).
Only then, in the late 1600s, was it taken over by the Chinese (Qing). But here’s the thing, it was more like a colony of the Qing, treated as - to use Emma Teng’s wording in Taiwan’s Imagined Geography - a barrier or barricade keeping the ‘real’ Qing China safe. In fact, the Qing didn’t even want Taiwan at first, the emperor called it “a ball of mud beyond the pale of civilization”. Prior to that, and to a great extent at that time, there was no concept on the part of China that Taiwan was Chinese, even though Chinese immigrants began moving to Taiwan under Dutch colonial rule (mostly encouraged by the Dutch, to work as laborers). When the Spanish landed in the north of Taiwan, it was the Dutch, not the Chinese, who kicked them out.
Under Qing colonial rule - and yes, I am choosing my words carefully - China only controlled the Western half of Taiwan. They didn’t even have maps for the eastern half. That’s how uninterested in it they were. I can’t say that the Qing controlled “Taiwan”, they only had power over part of it.
Note that the Qing were Manchu, which at the time of their conquest had not been a part of China: China itself essentially became a Manchu imperial holding, and Taiwan did as well, once they were convinced it was not a “ball of mud” but actually worth taking. Taiwan was not treated the same way as the rest of “Qing China”, and was not administered as a province until (I believe) 1887. So that’s around 200 years of Taiwan being a colony of the Qing.
What happened in the late 19th century to change China’s mind? Japan. A Japanese ship was shipwrecked in eastern Taiwan in the 1870s, and the crew was killed by hostile indigenous people in what is known as the Mudan Incident. A Japanese emissary mission went to China to inquire about what could be done, only to be told that China had no control there and if they went to eastern Taiwan, they did so at their own peril. China had not intended to imply that Taiwan wasn’t theirs, but they did. Japan - and other foreign powers, as France also attempted an invasion - were showing an interest in Taiwan, so China decided to cement its claim, started mapping the entire island, and made it a province.
So, I suppose for a decade or so Taiwan was a part of China. A China that no longer exists.
It remained a province until 1895, when it was ceded to Japan after the (first) Sino-Japanese War. Before that could happen, Taiwan declared itself a Republic, although it was essentially a Qing puppet state (though the history here is interesting - correspondence at the time indicates that the leaders of this ‘Republic of Taiwan’ considered themselves Chinese, and the tiger flag hints at this as well. However, the constitution was a very republican document, not something you’d expect to see in Qing-era China.) That lasted for less than a year, when the Japanese took it by force.
This is important for two reasons - the first is that some interpretations of IR theory state that when a colonial holding is released, it should revert to the state it was in before it was taken as a colony. In this case, that would actually be The Republic of Taiwan, not Qing-era China. Secondly, it puts to rest all notions that there was no Taiwan autonomy movement prior to 1947.
In any case, it would be impossible to revert to its previous state, as the government that controlled it - the Qing empire - no longer exists. The current government of China - the PRC - has never controlled it.
After the Japanese colonial era, there is a whole web of treaties and agreements that do not satisfactorily settle the status of Taiwan. None of them actually do so - those which explicitly state that Taiwan is to be given to the Republic of China (such as the Cairo declaration) are non-binding. Those that are binding do not settle the status of Taiwan (neither the treaty of San Francisco nor the Treaty of Taipei definitively say that Taiwan is a part of China, or even which China it is - the Treaty of Taipei sets out what nationality the Taiwanese are to be considered, but that doesn’t determine territorial claims). Treaty-wise, the status of Taiwan is “undetermined”.
Under more modern interpretations, what a state needs to be a state is…lessee…a contiguous territory, a government, a military, a currency…maybe I’m forgetting something, but Taiwan has all of it. For all intents and purposes it is independent already.
In fact, in the time when all of these agreements were made, the Allied powers weren’t as sure as you might have learned about what to do with Taiwan. They weren’t a big fan of Chiang Kai-shek, didn’t want it to go Communist, and discussed an Allied trusteeship (which would have led to independence) or backing local autonomy movements (which did exist). That it became what it did - “the ROC” but not China - was an accident (as Hsiao-ting Lin lays out in Accidental State).
In fact, the KMT knew this, and at the time the foreign minister (George Yeh) stated something to the effect that they were aware they were ‘squatters’ in Taiwan.
Since then, it’s true that the ROC claims to be the rightful government of Taiwan, however, that hardly matters when considering the future of Taiwan simply because they have no choice. To divest themselves of all such claims (and, presumably, change their name) would be considered by the PRC to be a declaration of formal independence. So that they have not done so is not a sign that they wish to retain the claim, merely that they wish to avoid a war.
It’s also true that most Taiwanese are ethnically “Han” (alongside indigenous and Hakka, although Hakka are, according to many, technically Han…but I don’t think that’s relevant here). But biology is not destiny: what ethnicity someone is shouldn’t determine what government they must be ruled by.
Through all of this, the Taiwanese have evolved their own culture, identity and sense of history. They are diverse in a way unique to Taiwan, having been a part of Austronesian and later Hoklo trade routes through Southeast Asia for millenia. Now, one in five (I’ve heard one in four, actually) Taiwanese children has a foreign parent. The Taiwanese language (which is not Mandarin - that’s a KMT transplant language forced on Taiwanese) is gaining popularity as people discover their history. Visiting Taiwan and China, it is clear where the cultural differences are, not least in terms of civic engagement. This morning, a group of legislators were removed after a weekend-long pro-labor hunger strike in front of the presidential palace. They were not arrested and will not be. Right now, a group of pro-labor protesters is lying down on the tracks at Taipei Main Station to protest the new labor law amendments.
This would never be allowed in China, but Taiwanese take it as a fiercely-guarded basic right.
*
Now, as I said, none of this matters.
What matters is self-determination. If you believe in democracy, you believe that every state (and Taiwan does fit the definition of a state) that wants to be democratic - that already is democratic and wishes to remain that way - has the right to self-determination. In fact, every nation does. You cannot be pro-democracy and also believe that it is acceptable to deprive people of this right, especially if they already have it.
Taiwan is already a democracy. That means it has the right to determine its own future. Period.
Even under the ROC, Taiwan was not allowed to determine its future. The KMT just arrived from China and claimed it. The Taiwanese were never asked if they consented. What do we call it when a foreign government arrives in land they had not previously governed and declares itself the legitimate governing power of that land without the consent of the local people? We call that colonialism.
Under this definition, the ROC can also be said to be a colonial power in Taiwan. They forced Mandarin - previously not a language native to Taiwan - onto the people, taught Chinese history, geography and culture, and insisted that the Taiwanese learn they were Chinese - not Taiwanese (and certainly not Japanese). This was forced on them. It was not chosen. Some, for awhile, swallowed it. Many didn’t. The independence movement only grew, and truly blossomed after democratization - something the Taiwanese fought for and won, not something handed to them by the KMT.
So what matters is what the Taiwanese want, not what the ROC is forced to claim. I cannot stress this enough - if you do not believe Taiwan has the right to this, you do not believe in democracy.
And poll after poll shows it: Taiwanese identify more as Taiwanese than Chinese (those who identify as both primarily identify as Taiwanese, just as I identify as American and Armenian, but primarily as American. Armenian is merely my ethnicity). They overwhelmingly support not unifying with China. The vast majority who support the status quo support one that leads to eventual de jure independence, not unification. The status quo is not - and cannot be - an endgame (if only because China has declared so, but also because it is untenable). Less than 10% want unification. Only a small number (a very small minority) would countenance unification in the future…even if China were to democratize.
The issue isn’t the incompatibility of the systems - it’s that the Taiwanese fundamentally do not see themselves as Chinese.
A change in China’s system won’t change that. It’s not an ethnic nationalism - there is no ethnic argument for Taiwan (or any nation - didn’t we learn in the 20th century what ethnicity-based nation-building leads to? Nothing good). It’s not a jingoistic or xenophobic nationalism - Taiwanese know that to be dangerous. It’s a nationalism based on shared identity, culture, history and civics. The healthiest kind of nationalism there is. Taiwan exists because the Taiwanese identify with it. Period.
There are debates about how long the status quo should go on, and what we should risk to insist on formal recognition. However, the question of whether or not to be Taiwan, not China…
…well, that’s already settled.
The Taiwanese have spoken and they are not Chinese.
Whatever y’all think about that doesn’t matter. That’s what they want, and if you believe in self-determination you will respect it.
If you don’t, good luck with your authoritarian nonsense, but Taiwan wants nothing to do with it.
ship accident 在 Moto Lê Youtube 的精選貼文
150cc giá 30tr
200cc giá 34tr
250cc giá 36tr
350cc 2 xi lanh + két nước giá 54tr. Tất cả đều No pp
Hãng sx Zongshen. Thời gian đặt hàng khoảng 20 ngày xe về. Chi tiết liên hệ 03989 06789- Tại Tp Lạng Sơn ship tận nơi trên toàn quốc. Giá trên chưa gồm cước phí ship. Cước ship 2 triệu~2tr500 ~ 3trieu tùy tỉnh xa gần
ship accident 在 賢賢的奇異世界 Youtube 的最讚貼文
想要学习如何在youtube赚钱请按这:http://goo.gl/fTJRcY
影片URL:https://youtu.be/xXPEf4kUpMg
預告片:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_6mPUrZIOE
推薦影片:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9HDwnW-tUE
推薦影片:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlWAGSgJfq0
ID4星際重生,或叫独立日2:星際重生:ID4:Independence day 2:Resurgence終於要上映了!相隔第一集ID4已經二十年咯
我一看了ID4:星際重生,獨立日2預告片,我就再看回獨立日來回顧一下
以前獨立日:independence day對於那時候的我們究竟有多麼的震撼
雖然那時的電腦技術比不起現在的ID4星際重生
但那個時候是最新的技術。
現在就讓我為介紹ID4星際重生 的故事
這套電影的時間線是跟住以前的故事在跑
那時的ID4是在1996年
那ID4星際重生故事的主角們也是跟住這是時間成長。
以前的物理學家(David Levinson)
在ID4:星際重生也變成ESD地球保衛局的主席
因為上一次的外星人入侵,知道科技懸殊
他用了二十年用外星人的技術去加強太空保衛戰力。
你可以看到很多反重力的配件加到飛機和直升機
上面了。
可惜Will Smith沒有參與這次的ID4星際重生
所以導演一來就賜他死,就說他太空飛機失事
這麼多外星人都打他不下
換來的是他戲裡的兒子。
對!就是以前那個小屁男。
哇!!Angelababy 呢!哎呀~不是Handela baby
啦!!這次她在ID4星際重生飾演中國戰機師加ESD的上校!
這位是。。。。有點臉熟哦~~像不像雷神?他就是
雷神的弟弟,他就好啦,可以和總統的女兒談戀愛
,這個就是以前的小女孩,現在長大了。
我一定要講的就是這一位,他就是以前ID4的總統,再
聽回他以前的致辭,還是那麼的感動和振奮人心。
讓我們來重溫一下他的致辭:
Good morning. In less than an hour, aircraft from
here will join others from around the world. And
you will be launching the largest aerial battle in this
history of mankind.
Mankind -- that word should have new meaning for
all of us today.
We can't be consumed by our petty differences
anymore.
We will be united in our common interests.
Perhaps its fate that today is the 4th of July, and
you will once again be fighting for our freedom, not
from tyranny, oppression, or persecution -- but
from annihilation.
We're fighting for our right to live, to exist.
And should we win the day, the 4th of July will no
longer be known as an American holiday, but as the
day when the world declared in one voice:
"We will not go quietly into the night!
We will not vanish without a fight!
We're going to live on!
We're going to survive!"
Today, we celebrate our Independence Day!
Part 3
不是美國的獨立日,而是地球的獨立日!好感人的致辭!
這次的ID4星際重生當然是說外星人再一次侵略地球,不過
這次的導演玩很大哦~~有多大?以前是醬油碟,
現在是大盤哦!!哈哈哈。看到這個畫面你就知道
這次的有多大了!
以前我在看獨立日第一集時會覺得有點不滿足,覺
得打得不夠厲害,這次好像是勢均力敵哦~~有好
戲看哦~~
導演還是跟世界各地的建築物有仇咯~~你看,這
個是新加坡的Marina Bay,這個是Dubai塔,飛到倫
敦了?還有我們的雙峰塔得罪你了啊?導演你曾
經被建築師拋棄過啊?
我們都希望這次續集是比第一集更震撼,由於電腦
科技的進步,可能以前第一集的極限,可以在續集
完成,我非常期待這次的ID4星際重生,獨立日2!
那我給你們一些建議:
第一:如果你還沒看過第一集,趕快去看第一集。
第二:如果你是獨立日的粉絲,都是那句,拿去吧
~我們的錢~你不可能會錯過吧!
ID4星際重生即將會在六月二十三號上映,我一定會趕快
預訂戲票,然後到時會和大家說好不好看的!
如果你還沒訂閱我的channel,請按這邊!接下來
想做兩齣戲,一個是Now you see me,另一個就是
Me before you,請大家投票一下。
謝謝大家收看,下一個影片見!
It is so excited that Independence day : Resurgence
will show in cinema on 23/June
It has been almost 20 years already,It is so excited
that Independence day : Resurgence will show in
cinema on 23/June
I watch the ID4 again after I saw the ID4
Resurgence trailer.
This movie really gave us an impact in that time.
Although the computer graphic is not so advances,
But It was the latest technology in previous time.
Let me brief you how the ID4 2 story.
The time lime of the movie is follow the previously
story.
The first episode was in 1996,So the characters
are growing too.
The physicist David Levinson in the past,Now
become director of the Earth Space Defense,He
knew that earth defense are weeks from last Alien
Invasion
So he was using alien technology on the earth
defense. You can see antigravity engine already
applied on helicopter and jets
Too bad that Will Smith isn’t in this Id4, So the
director ‘killed’ him in space ship accident.
Even Alien can’t kill him ...accident?
So his’ son’ replaced ,Ya, the small kid in previous movie
ship accident 在 Corinne Vigniel Youtube 的最讚貼文
Hong Kong residents can't believe their eyes as a giant ship heads straight towards university sports grounds.
Copyright: Corinne Vigniel/ To use this video in a commercial player or in broadcasts, please email licensing@storyful.com
A German-flagged container ship headed straight towards shore and briefly ran aground in Hong Kong on Sunday afternoon (April 6, 2014).
The 192.5-meter-long Hansa Constitution was travelling along the busy East Lamma shipping channel when it veered off course and headed straight towards shore.
The Hong Kong Marine Department said the ship's main engine broke down.
The crew dropped anchor, making loud screeching noises, to try and slow it down as it headed straight towards the sea wall of the University of Hong Kong sports grounds in Pok Fu Lam.
The ship ground to a halt at around 15.22 local. It then slowly reversed, as Marine, police and fire services headed towards the site. It was eventually towed free. No one was injured.
The ship was sailing from Yokohama to Chiwan port in Shenzhen, China.
目定口呆: 192.5米貨船, 行駛東博寮海峽期間, 突然偏離航線, 直沖香港大學何鴻燊體育中心..直至擱淺岸邊.
海事處表示是主要機件故障.
熟悉船務的人表示船長應是故意把船開離繁忙航道, 避免在停頓前撞倒其他船隻. 船後來被拖走.
Copyright: Corinne Vigniel
Location: Near Stanley Ho sports center, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong 何鴻燊體育中心
Date: 15:22 local time on April 6, 2014
Camera: iPhone 4S
Copyright: Corinne Vigniel
Location: Near Stanley Ho sports center, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong 何鴻燊體育中心
Date: 15:22 local time on April 6, 2014
Camera: iPhone 4S
Copyright: Corinne Vigniel/ To use this video in a commercial player or in broadcasts, please email licensing@storyful.com
ship accident 在 Latest News, Photos, Videos on Ship Accident - NDTV.COM 的相關結果
At least 21 people were killed and dozens remain missing as a boat packed with passengers and a sand-laden cargo ship collided Friday in a lake in eastern ... ... <看更多>
ship accident 在 Marine Accident/Incident Investigation Reports - 国土交通省 的相關結果
Date of Occurrence Date of Publication Accident or Incident Type of Accident
2019.11.16 2021.02.18 Accident Fatality of a crew member
2019.10.15 2021.03.25 Accident Collision
2019.10.12 2021.02.18 Accident Foundering ... <看更多>
ship accident 在 Maritime News from around the world - FleetMon 的相關結果
Maritime matters and news for the shipping industry, maritime ... priority is to find out about maritime accidents, involving merchant marine ships, ASAP. ... <看更多>