#大學唔係呢回事!🌋
👶🏻Q: 讀Law係咪真係好辛苦?要讀乜㗎?📖
👩🏻A: 辛唔辛苦好因人而異。有啲人覺得要睇晒咁多reading好辛苦,咁如果你自己識選擇一啲合適嘅黎睇都OK。可以問吓師兄姐拎source可以幫到你好多。至於要讀啲咩就好廣泛,有contract (合約法), tort (侵權 eg旅遊巴意外 員工有冇得向公司索償), criminal (刑事), constitutional law, administrative law (依兩類都係類似講下社會中發生嘅事 eg佔領中環、司法覆核、同志平權呢類型嘅事件), equity and trust, land... Year1仲會有一科叫做legal research and writing (主要教下你點樣寫一啲legal documents)。
咁多年每一年都會有一科係特別難頂。不過大學科科都係咁辛苦。相比起其他engineering/ architecture 要日日留係個lab度 其實law都唔係真係咁辛苦。
而LLB/ ALaw/ BLaw/ GLaw就課程上都會有少少唔同。
//
👶🏻Q: grad咗之後想做律師,要啲咩條件同埋成條path係點樣?👩🏻⚖👨🏻⚖
👩🏻A: 要成為一個律師除了要完成法律學位之外,亦要完成為期一年,等同執業牌照的法學專業證書(Postgraduate Certificate in Laws)。大律師(Barrister)就跟師傅實習一年,事務律師(solicitor)就去律師行實習兩年。
要入PCLL的話唔同uni收生都唔同,例如要HKU學生入番HKU PCLL就要Law GPA 2.8 full time, 2.6 part-time, 如果要apply government fund, 就要CGPA 3.35(每年都會唔同, 數據係2017-18年度)。學費方面,三間收費不同,HKU大約16萬左右。
(https://stealjobs.com/讀law中伏之謎-香港法律系前途與理想深度分析/)
(👶🏻大大: 👩🏻揾呢篇文章有好多詳細嘢,例如「一般而言大型的國際律師行會提早兩年招聘實習律師,學生在尾二那年的暑假會在那些律師行做實習,爭取獲聘取得Training Contract的機會。」同埋「很多人以為有法律學位,就等於可以做律師,事實絕非如此。事實上,每年有數以千計的本地法律系畢業生,加上幾百個外國回流的留學生,爭奪大約七百個PCLL學位,換言之進入PCLL的機會只有一半左右。想像下寒窗苦讀三四年,到頭來當不成律師,的確是頗大的打擊。由於PCLL的收生嚴格,但過程其實不太透明,三間院校的收生標準是否劃一,本地生和海外生之間的競爭是否公平等等,一直存在極大爭議。」仲有其他細節,大家記得睇👍🏼)
//
👶🏻Q: Law呢行會唔會市場飽和㗎?🤔
👩🏻A: 都應該飽和緊。之前有新聞話Law Society 減少緊foreign lawyer嚟香港。然後又想整一個common entrance exam。目的就係cut少啲人。
不過無論飽唔飽和都好,如果你係最top個堆,飽和都同您冇關係😂
//
👶🏻: 如果入唔到行又或者唔入行,咁啲人會做乜?
👩🏻: 有一部份GLaw會去做政府工,之前有個talk話AO有四分一都有law background。
(👶🏻大大:咁BLaw又有business background啦,然後大家英文都咁好,我諗大家揾工都唔困難嘅。)
//
//
//
Interviewee: Maggie, HKU Law Year 3🍍🍍🍍
Editor: 大大🖋
大大:下一篇會係喺CU讀Psycho Master嘅🐜分享,期待吓啦👍🏼
#Vocabno #English #DSE #18DSE #2018DSE #19DSE #2019DSE #20DSE #2020DSE #Reading #Writing #Speaking #Wordoftheday #Vocabulary #Expression #Phrase #HKDSE #LiberalStudies #通識 #LS #Dsetips #Linguistics #語言學 #Morphology #JUPAS
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過7萬的網紅Uncle Siu,也在其Youtube影片中提到,【電台節錄】蕭叔叔同大家講最愛的英文作家之一:英國法官 Lord Alfred Denning 。好書分享:The Discipline of Law。另外也講到叔叔對寫作的看法,和怎樣寫出結構嚴謹的文章。 Follow Uncle Siu: http://facebook.com/siuho...
「solicitor lawyer」的推薦目錄:
solicitor lawyer 在 Sam Tsang 曾思瀚 Facebook 的最讚貼文
TWELVE TOP INTERNATIONAL LAWYERS WARN OF “GRAVE THREATS” TO RULE OF LAW, JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN HONG KONG
For Immediate Release - Monday 16 October, 2017
Twelve senior international lawyers from the United Kingdom, the United States of America, Australia, Canada, South Africa and Malaysia, including the United Kingdom’s former Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice Lord Falconer QC, released a letter today expressing their concern that the imprisonment of Joshua Wong, Alex Chow and Nathan Law represents “a serious threat to the rule of law and a breach of the principle of ‘double jeopardy’ in Hong Kong”.
The lawyers criticize the Public Order Ordinance as a violation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and warn that China’s 2014 White Paper on Hong Kong threatens the independence of the judiciary which “risks becoming a charade, at the beck and call of the Chinese Communist Party.” Hong Kong’s rule of law and basic freedoms, at the heart of the principle of “one country, two systems”, now face grave threats, the twelve lawyers warn.
In addition to the former Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice in the United Kingdom, the letter is also signed by six other Queen’s Counsel (QCs) from the United Kingdom, including the chair of the Bar Human Rights Committee of England and Wales Kirsty Brimelow QC, former chief prosecutor in the trial of Slobodan Milosevic, Sir Geoffrey Nice QC, the former United Nations chief war crimes prosecutor in Sierra Leone, Sir Desmond de Silva QC, the United Kingdom’s former Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation and President of the Howard League for Penal Reform, Lord Carlile of Berriew QC, as well as prominent barristers Michael Mansfield QC and Rajiv Menon QC.
The South African judge and international jurist Justice Richard Goldstone, Canadian lawyer David Matas, Malaysian advocate and solicitor Andrew Khoo, Australian lawyer and former UN head of human rights in East Timor Patrick Burgess and American lawyer Jared Genser, who has represented several international figures such as Burma’s democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi when she was under house arrest, China’s Nobel Laureate Liu Xiaobo who died earlier this year and his widow Liu Xia, and former President of the Maldives Mohamed Nasheed, are also signatories to the letter.
The lawyers note that “serious concerns over the independence of the judiciary arise” from recent events in Hong Kong, as warned by Hong Kong’s own Court of Final Appeal Judge Kemal Bokhary five years ago. “Hong Kong’s judges want to protect its independence, but they face increasing pressure from Beijing,” the letter observed.
The full text of the letter is as follows:
As lawyers, we regard the imprisonment of Joshua Wong, Alex Chow and Nathan Law in Hong Kong as a serious threat to the rule of law and a breach of the principle of “double jeopardy” in Hong Kong – in violation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
These student activists led the Umbrella Movement in Hong Kong in 2014 – one of the most peaceful public protests the world has seen. Joshua Wong, Nathan Law and Alex Chow were already punished by a court a year ago. Joshua and Nathan respectively served 80 and 120 hours of community service, and Alex received a three-week suspended sentence. Yet the Hong Kong government decided to reopen the case and sought tougher punishments.
The law under which they were charged, the Public Order Ordinance, has been criticized by the United Nations for “facilitat[ing] excessive restrictions” to basic rights, and is incompatible with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which applies to Hong Kong. Human rights organisations have long urged Hong Kong to revise the ordinance to comply with the ICCPR.
Serious concerns over the independence of the judiciary arise. Court of Final Appeal judge Kemal Bokhary warned of “storm clouds” over the judiciary five years ago. Hong Kong’s judges want to protect its independence, but they face increasing pressure from Beijing. In 2014, China issued a White Paper declaring that Beijing has “comprehensive jurisdiction over Hong Kong” – instead of “the high degree of autonomy” provided for in the Sino-British Joint Declaration and the Basic Law, Hong Kong’s constitution. China also announced that Hong Kong’s judges are merely “administrators” who must love the country and be "subject to oversight by the central government”. The independence of the judiciary, a pillar of Hong Kong, risks becoming a charade, at the beck and call of the Chinese Communist Party.
Hong Kong’s rule of law and basic freedoms, at the heart of the principle of “one country, two systems”, now face grave threats.
Kirsty Brimelow QC
Patrick Burgess – President of Asia Justice and Rights (AJAR)
Lord Carlile of Berriew CBE QC
Sir Desmond De Silva QC
Lord Falconer of Thoroton QC – former Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice
Jared Genser – Freedom Now
Justice Richard Goldstone (South Africa)
Andrew Khoo (Malaysia)
David Matas (Canada)
Michael Mansfield QC
Rajiv Menon QC
Sir Geoffrey Nice QC – former chief prosecutor in the trial of Slobodan Milosevic
Coverage by The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/…/uk-lawyers-say-hong-kong-rule…
solicitor lawyer 在 Goodbye HK, Hello UK Facebook 的精選貼文
真係走得就走 (6):點樣搵人幫手申請移民(下)
上集講到英國本土嘅移民服務提供者嘅種類,厘個post繼續。
大律師(Barrister-at-law)嘅服務通常都係關於有法律上有爭議性嘅移民申請,而且聘請大律師都係必須要由業務律師代聘嘅(係絕對無例外嘅)。所以對於香港人一般嘅申請,我就唔知點解要咁大陣容,當然緊係因應自己嘅情況去衡量(尤其是係政治難民之類)。
至於於英國嘅業務律師(Solicitor),我諗大家都明白業務律師係唔會聲稱自己乜都識。所以通常會做會提供移民服務的話,都會講明自己係immigration lawyer/solicitor。
請留意,英國嘅大律師或者律師响香港執業係要同香港嘅公會批准,亦都要入境處同意,缺一不可。如果無嘅話,就等同無牌執業。我應為,只係極之需要先會「請個英國御用大律師去幫手」。正常申請係唔會無啦啦請個英國普通嘅大律師幫手嘅,因為成本係極之貴同無必要嘅。
最後就係註冊移民顧問(Registered Immigration Adviser),厘個係同香港完全無嘅專業。移民顧問公司响英國亦都要受法定機構 (OISC)監管同攞牌照嘅,其本上每一間嘅收費方法,服務形式都要管。原因點解我相信大家都好容易理解,因為英國實在太多唔同種類嘅移民申請,政府係唔會比任何人或者公司亂黎嘅。
其實,英國嘅移民律師同移民顧問响處理移民申請嘅職責上係無分別嘅。不過有一點係好有趣嘅,無論移民律師或者顧問都好,只有某一啲先會做埋各種Tier 1嘅Business Plan,有啲真係只會做到交application嗰一步。厘樣當然係會一早會通知客戶嘅。
有樣嘢記著,唔理係律師、顧問(或者醫生),世上係唔應該有「保證成功」,亦唔會有「做就幫你做,得唔得就唔知」厘兩樣嘢。無論香港或者英國,大家有時真係要明白專業人士嘅自我保護意識係好強嘅,咁亦代表佢地專業知識限制咗佢地唔會亂比結論。所以我建議大家都係唔好問,有幾多percent成功機會厘類問題。
因為如果一個專業人士話比大家聽99%得係無用嘅,最後都係有1%係唔得。話比你聽100%得反而係最驚嘅嘢。問題重點應該係佢地點樣令你完全了解,整個過程點做,令自己清楚將會面對嘅情況,可能性、問題或者困難。
純粹個人(不過好強力嘅)建議,如果大家去選擇香港嘅「移民顧問」嘅時候,最好去搵有英國嘅移民律師行或者註冊顧問支援嗰啲。原因係如果不幸有問題發生,點都可以搵到監管機構去跟進(而唔係消委會或者同我一樣自己忍咗佢)。移民係一件人生嘅大事,錢無咗可以搵過,但係申請途中有錯嘅記錄係可以好煩,而且時間亦係好重要嘅嘢。
當然最好嘅就係去一次英國,直接去問下當地嘅專業意見同價錢比較下。問嘢又唔洗錢嘅,等如我都會叫大家去英國買樓之前,不停去estate agents睇樓同一樣道理。
最後,我真心希望大家明白嘅係,既然大家決定舉家移民,又已經打算比錢搵人幫手。咁點解唔花小小時間同精神,去搵最有把握嘅人去幫自己呢?
#點搵移民顧問
#Post得就就預咗比人罵
#帶咗頭盔都有啲驚
#好多利益呀
#移民英國
#走得就走
#番英國
#點做英國公民
#居英權第二代
#T1Entrepreneur
#英國企業家簽證
#Tier2WorkingVisa
#英國工作簽證
#英國家庭團聚
#英國SettlementVisa
**************************
點樣搵人幫手申請移民(上)
http://bit.ly/2vYLtgL
移民係一條數學題
http://bit.ly/2wgKIyP
移民與香港買樓數學題
http://bit.ly/2vHSayM
點樣先可以做英國公民?
http://bit.ly/2vocSVY
點做Tier 1企業家?
http://bit.ly/2xKtisJ
**************************
solicitor lawyer 在 Uncle Siu Youtube 的精選貼文
【電台節錄】蕭叔叔同大家講最愛的英文作家之一:英國法官 Lord Alfred Denning 。好書分享:The Discipline of Law。另外也講到叔叔對寫作的看法,和怎樣寫出結構嚴謹的文章。
Follow Uncle Siu:
http://facebook.com/siuhoiyat
solicitor lawyer 在 What is the difference between a lawyer, solicitor and barrister? 的推薦與評價
... <看更多>