關於 apple one香港 ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

【北京施壓？地產商立刻唔認起納米樓】

#再上外媒

相對於以往發展商自豪起納米樓可以「迎合市場需求」、增加可建單位數目，講到納米樓係窮人上車恩物咁。最近北風起，中央表示「遊戲規則已變」禁止地產商「壟斷行為」後，竟出現地產商對納米樓態度180度轉變（至少表面上）嘅怪現象，好似暗地裡承認起納米樓本來就有問題。

外媒彭博新聞社(Bloomberg News) 翻查最新屋宇署資料，發現新鴻基位於籌備中嘅西貢西沙路大型項目，驚現只得88平方呎實用面積嘅單位，亦引述本研社今年頭發布嘅《納椎之地：香港納米樓研究報告2010－2019年》數據：近十年落成嘅納米樓單位85%連房都無，70%有黑厠，咁大家想像下得88平方呎實用面積嘅單位會係咩樣？

有趣嘅係，新鴻基回覆彭博個圖則唔係最終計劃嚟嘅 (The one currently filed wth the Buildings Department does not reflect the latest design)，暗示樓盤設計將會執過，唔會出現得88平方呎、慘絕人寰嘅蝸居空間。

呢個係咪中央施壓嘅效果無從證實，但明顯香港地產商已經知道形勢已變，需要短期內向外釋出「友善」訊息，避免觸及中央所指嘅「壟斷行為」。但講真個句，過往容許呢啲「壟斷行為」嘅香港政府，又需唔需要被問責呢？

參考資料
Bloomberg. 23 September 2021. H.K. Developer Says Tiny Flat Plans Aren’t Current.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-23/flats-the-size-of-two-kingsize-beds-are-being-built-in-hong-kong

《納椎之地：香港納米樓研究報告2010－2019年》.本土研究社
https://bit.ly/3i128qh

延伸閱讀
【整改清算】香港地產商十大高危「#壟斷行為」 https://www.facebook.com/localresearch/posts/4474556349307070

本研Podcast 閒置中 Ep57 - 施壓中 - 地產商就嚟冇得玩？
🍎立即於Apple Podcast收聽：
https://apple.co/3mF1IFz
🎧Spotify：
https://spoti.fi/3EwCgMw
⚓️網上版：
https://bit.ly/3zlaIG3

Hong Kong Free Press. 21 September 2021. Hong Kong’s Carrie Lam says developers ‘willing to cooperate’ on housing, but researchers say current schemes ‘negligible’
https://hongkongfp.com/2021/09/21/hong-kongs-carrie-lam-says-developers-willing-to-cooperate-on-housing-but-researchers-say-current-schemes-negligible/

-
研究有價　月捐撐起土地研究工作：https://liber-research.com/support-us/
FPS ID：5390547
HSBC PayMe 捐款支持：https://bit.ly/32aoOMn
戶口號碼：匯豐銀行 640-198305-001 (LIBER RESEARCH COMMUNITY (HK) COMPANY LIMITED)
義工招募：https://bit.ly/2SbbyT3

大新信用卡STUDIO A / DG Lifestyle Store購物簽賬優惠！可享高達HK$450現金回贈 + iPad Air 限定套裝優惠 + 6個月分期$0手續費優惠！

👉 優惠詳情：flyformiles.hk/29371
🔥 適用信用卡：(只限9月1日至9月30日申請)
1️⃣ 大新ANA信用卡：flyformiles.hk/dsb.ana.apply
2️⃣ 大新BA信用卡： flyformiles.hk/dsb.ba.avios
3️⃣ 大新Autotoll信用卡：flyformiles.hk/dsb.autotoll
(同時於申請表格tick埋連同大新ONE+申請先有額外$500 Apple Gift Card 或 超市禮券 或 American Tourister 20吋行李箱，單獨申請就只有$200超市禮券 或 Apple Gift Card)

4️⃣ 大新ONE+信用卡：flyformiles.hk/dsb.oneplus ($250超市禮券 或 Apple Gift Card)

聽聞iPhone 13即將發佈，唔知大家準備好換新機未呢？今次Studio A係Apple嘅premium reseller優惠就啱哂你啦！如果黎緊想買新iPhone／Apple產品都可以經佢地買～由即日起至2021年10月31日期間，用大新信用卡仲可以享有簽賬優惠，憑大新信用卡於STUDIO A / DG Lifestyle Store作指定簽賬可享高達HK$450現金回贈及以下優惠：

1️⃣ 優惠一：於STUDIO A / DG Lifestyle Store之全線香港門市或網上商店(www.sagroup.com.hk)進行符合以下指定簽賬要求之單一合資格簽賬，可享高達HK$450現金回贈！
✅ 單一簽賬淨額滿$3,000至$5,999，可享$100現金回贈
✅ 單一簽賬淨額滿$6,000至$8,999，可享$200現金回贈
✅ 單一簽賬淨額滿$9,000或以上，可享$400現金回贈

於推廣期內，網上商店購買可享額外$50現金回贈，整個推廣期最高現金回贈上限HK$450，名額3000個！

2️⃣ 優惠二：iPad Air 限定套裝優惠
✅ 推廣期內，以優惠價$6,000於 STUDIO A / DG Lifestyle Store 之門市或網上商店（www.sagroup.com.hk）購買「iPad Air 限定套裝」（參考總值：$6,624）

3️⃣ 優惠三：6個月分期$0手續費
✅ 全新客戶*由即日至2021年12月31日期間，經網上成功申請大新信用卡「開心消費分期」計劃，尊享首10,000港元6個月分期$0手續費優惠3次#！
*全新客戶指由2021年2月1日至2021年6月30日期間，未曾經網上成功申請大新信用卡「開心消費分期」計劃之客戶。

留意番以上優惠並不適用於以Alipay、WeChat Pay、現金券及免息分期付款架！
-------------------------------
🔥 小斯獨家派錢開戶優惠，賺盡可高達$8,300：flyformiles.hk/37350

---------------------------------
🔥 AE Explorer 小斯獨家優惠：flyformiles.hk/ae-explorer
(喺9月10日至17日經小斯呢條link申請，簽任何金額一次就有高達HK$1,000現金券，當中包括HK$500 Apple Gift Card/超市禮券/一田禮券，簽多HK$5,000仲有多HK$500 city’super現金券，合共價值高達HK$1,500嘅現金券呀！)

---------------------------------
🔥 小斯獨家證券戶口開戶優惠：
✅ 盈立證券小斯獨家送$1,400獎賞：flyformiles.hk/42877
✅ 華盛證券毋須交易有約$1,000獎賞：flyformiles.hk/31431 (申請連結：flyformiles.hk/vbkr)
✅ 富途牛牛有高達$1,500：flyformiles.hk/34810 (小斯code：GMAW3UG4)
✅ 富元證券送$820 股票：flyformiles.hk/40570
✅ 微牛證券$1,000獎賞：flyformiles.hk/40550

---------------------------------
🔥 小斯獨家銀行戶口開戶優惠：
✅ livi bank開完即有$250 + 網上簽賬8%回贈：flyformiles.hk/26781 (小斯code：fly#250)
✅ WeLab Bank 開完送$250 (100%簽賬回贈)：flyformiles.hk/26789 (小斯code：JASIUC)
✅ Mox Bank 開完送高達$400：flyformiles.hk/20922 (小斯code：CZDE5V + 開戶連結：flyformiles.hk/moxbank)
✅ ZA Bank 開完簽一次有$150：flyformiles.hk/20904 (小斯code：SIUC150)
✅ 工銀亞洲手機銀行額外$100：flyformiles.hk/27345 (小斯code：FLYMILES)

毋忘五大訴求　公民抗命有理
—10‧20九龍遊行陳情書
（案件編號：DCCC 535/2020）

——————————————————
「毋忘初衷，活在愛和真實之中」
撐阿銘，即訂閱Patreon：
patreon.com/raphaelwong
—————————————————

胡法官雅文閣下：

　　2012年，我第一次站在法庭上承認違反「公安惡法」，述說對普選的盼望，批評公安惡法不義，並因公民抗命的緣故，甘心樂意接受刑罰。當年我說，如果小圈子選舉沒有被廢除，惡法沒有消失，我依然會一如故我，公民抗命，並且我相信將會有更多學生和市民加入這個行列。想不到時至今日，普選仍然遙遙無期，我亦再次被帶到法庭接受審判，但只是短短７年，已經有數十萬計的群眾公民抗命，反對暴政。今日，我承認違反「未經批准的政府」所訂立「未經批准的惡法」之下的「未經批准集結」罪，我不打算尋求法庭的憐憫，但請容許我佔用法庭些微時間陳情，讓法庭在判刑前有全面考慮。

暴力之濫觴

　　在整個反修例運動如火如荼之際，我正承擔另一宗公民抗命案件的刑責。雖然身在獄中，但仍然心繫手足。我在獄中電視機前見證6月9日、6月16日及8月18日三次百萬港人大遊行，幾多熱愛和平的港人冒天雨冒彈雨走上街頭，抗議不義惡法，今日關於10月20日的案件，亦是如此。可能有人會問，政府已在6月暫緩修例，更在9月正式撤回修例，我等仍然繼續示威，豈非無理取鬧？我相信法官閣下肯定聽過「遲來的正義並非正義」（Justice delayed is justice denied）這句格言。當過百萬群眾走上街頭，和平表達不滿的時候，林鄭政府沒有理睬，反而獨行獨斷，粗暴踐踏港人的意願，結果製造出後來連綿不絕的爭拗，甚至你死我活的對抗。經歷眾多衝突痛苦之後，所謂暫緩撤回，已經微不足道，我們只是更加清楚：沒有民主，就連基本人權都不會擁有！

　　在本案之中，雖然我們都沒有鼓動或作出暴力行為，但根據早前8‧18及10‧1兩宗案件，相信在控方及法庭眼中，案發當日的暴力事件仍然可以算在我們頭上，如此，我有必要問：如果香港有一個公平正義的普及選舉，人民可以在立法會直接否決他們不認可的法律，試問2019年的暴力衝突可以從何而來呢？如果我們眼見的暴力是如此十惡不赦，那麼我們又如何看待百萬人遊行後仍然堅持推行惡法的制度暴力呢？如果我們不能接受人民暴力反抗，那麼我們是否更加不能對更巨大更壓逼的制度暴力沈默不言？真正且經常發生的暴力，是漠視人民訴求的暴力，是踐踏人民意見的暴力，是剝奪人民表達權利的暴力。真正憎恨暴力，痛恨暴力的人，不可能一方面指摘暴力反抗，又容忍制度暴力。如果我需要承擔和平遊行引發出來的暴力事件的刑責，那麼誰應該承擔施政失敗所引發出來的社會騷亂的罪責呢？

社會之病根

　　對於法庭而言，可能2019年所發生的事情只是一場社會騷亂，務必追究違法者個人責任。然而，治亂治其本源，醫病醫其病根，我雖然公民抗命，刻意違法，控方把我帶上法庭，但我卻不應被理解為一個「犯罪個體」。2019年所發生的事情，並不是我一個人或我們這幾位被告可以促成，社會問題的癥結不是「犯罪份子」本身，而是「犯罪原因」。我明白「治亂世用重典」的道理，但如果「殺雞儆猴」是解決方法，就不會在2016年發生旺角騷亂及2017年上訴庭對示威者施以重刑後，2019年仍然會爆發出更大規模的暴力反抗。

如果不希望社會動亂，就必須正本清源，逐步落實「五大訴求」，從根本上改革，挽回民心。2019年反修例運動，其實只是2014年雨傘運動的延續而已，縱使法庭可能認為兩個運動皆是「一股歪風」所引起，但我必須澄清，兩個運動的核心就是追求民主普選，人民當家作主。在2019年11月24日區議會選舉這個最類近全民普選的選舉中，接近300萬人投票，民主派大勝，奪得17個區議會主導權，這就是整個反修例運動的民意，民意就是反對政府決策，反對制度暴力，反對推行惡法，不容爭辯，不辯自明。我們作為礦場裡的金絲雀，多次提醒政府撤回修法，並從根本上改革制度，而在10月20日的九龍遊行當然是反映民意的平台契機。如今，法庭對我們施加重刑，其實只不過是懲罰民意，將金絲雀困在鳥籠之內，甚至扼殺於鼓掌之中，窒礙表達自由。

堅持之重要

　　大運動過後的大鎮壓，使我們失去《蘋果日報》，失去教協，失去民陣，不少民主派領袖以及曾為運動付出的手足戰友都囚於獄中，不少曾經熱情投入運動的朋友亦因《國安法》的威脅轉為低調，新聞自由示威自由日漸萎縮，公民社會受到沈重打擊，我亦失去不少摯友，有感傷孤獨的時候，但我仍然相信，2019年香港人的信念，以及所展現人類的光輝持久未變。我不會忘記百萬人民冒雨捱熱抗拒暴政，抵制惡法，展現我們眾志成城；我不會忘記人潮紅海，讓道救護車，展現我們文明精神；我不會忘記年青志士直接行動反對苛政，捨身成仁，展現我們膽色勇氣；我不會忘記銀髮一族走上街頭保護年青人，展現我們彼此關懷；我不會忘記「五大訴求」，不會忘記2019年區議會選舉，展現我們有理有節。

　　法官閣下，我對於當日的所作所為，不感羞恥，毫無悔意。我能夠在出獄後與群眾同行一路，與戰友同繫一獄，實是莫大榮幸。若法治失去民主基石，將使法庭無奈地接受專制政權所訂立解釋的法律限制，隨時變成政治工具掃除異見，因此爭取民主普選，建設真正法治，追求公平正義，仍然是我的理想。在這條路上，如有必要，我仍然會公民抗命，正如終審法院海外非常任法官賀輔明（Lord Hoffmann）所言，發自良知的公民抗命有悠久及光榮的傳統，歷史將證明我們是正確的。我期望，曾與我一起遊行抗命的手足戰友要堅持信念，在艱難歲月裡毋忘初衷，活在愛和真實之中。

　　最後，如9年前一樣，我想借用美國民權領袖馬丁路德金牧師的一番話對我們的反對者說：「我們將以自己忍受苦難的能力，來較量你們製造苦難的能力。我們將用我們靈魂的力量，來抵禦你們物質的暴力。對我們做你們想做的事吧，我們仍然愛你們。我們不能憑良心服從你們不公正的法律，因為拒惡與為善一樣是道德責任。將我們送入監獄吧，我們仍然愛你們。」（We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you.）

　　願慈愛的主耶穌賜我們平安，與我和我一家同在，與法官閣下同在，與香港人同在。沒有暴徒，只有暴政；五大訴求，缺一不可！願榮耀歸上帝，榮光歸人民！

第五被告
黃浩銘
二零二一年八月十九日

Lest we forget the five demands: civil disobedience is morally justified
- Statement on 10‧20 Kowloon Rally
(Case No.: DCCC 535/2020)

Your Honour Judge Woodcock

In 2012, I stood before the court and admitted to violating the "Public Security Evil Law". I expressed my hope for universal suffrage, criticized the evil law as unjust, and willingly accepted the penalty for civil disobedience. Back then, I said that if the small-circle election had not been abolished and the draconian law had not disappeared, I would still be as determined as I was, and I believe that more students and citizens would join this movement. Today, universal suffrage is still a long way off, and I have been brought before the court again for trial. But in just seven years, hundreds of thousands of people have already risen up in civil disobedience against tyranny. Today, I plead guilty to "unauthorised assembly" under an unapproved evil law enacted by an unauthorised government. I do not intend to seek the court's mercy, but please allow me to take up a little time in court to present my case so that the court can consider all aspects before sentencing me.

The roots of violence

At the time when the whole anti-extradition law movement was in full-swing, I was taking responsibility for another civil disobedience case. Although I was in prison, my heart was still with the people. I witnessed the three million-person rallies on 9 June, 16 June and 18 August on television in prison, when many peace-loving people took to the streets despite the rain and bullets, to protest against unjust laws. Some people may ask, "The Government has already suspended the legislative amendments in June and formally withdrew the bill in September, but we are still demonstrating, are we not being unreasonable?" I am sure your Honour has heard of the adage "Justice delayed is justice denied". When more than a million people took to the streets to express their discontent peacefully, the Lam administration ignored them and instead acted arbitrarily, brutally trampling on the wishes of the people of Hong Kong, resulting in endless arguments and even confrontations. After so many conflicts and painful experiences, the so-called moratorium is no longer meaningful. We only know better: without democracy, we cannot even have basic human rights!

In this case, although we did not instigate or commit acts of violence, I believe that in the eyes of the prosecution and the court, the violence on the day of the incident can still be counted against us, based on the August 18 and October 1 case. And now I must ask - If Hong Kong had a fair and just universal election, and the public could directly veto laws they did not approve of at the Legislative Council, then how could the violent clashes of 2019 have come about? If the violence we see is so heinous, how do we feel about the institutional violence that insists on the imposition of draconian laws even after millions of people have taken to the streets? If we cannot accept violent rebellion, how can we remain silent in the face of even greater and more oppressive institutional violence? The true and frequent violence is the kind of violence that ignores people's demands, that tramples on their opinions, that deprives them of their right to express themselves. People who truly hate violence and abhor it cannot accuse violent resistance on the one hand and tolerate institutional violence on the other. If I have to bear the criminal responsibility for the violence caused by the peaceful demonstration, then who should bear the criminal responsibility for the social unrest caused by failed administration?

The roots of society's problems

From a court's point of view, it may be that what happened in 2019 was just a series of social unrest, and that those who broke the law must be held personally accountable. What happened in 2019 was not something that I alone or the defendants could have made possible, and the crux of the social problem was not the 'criminals' but the 'causes of crime'. I understand the concept of " applying severe punishment to a troubled world", but if "decimation" was really the solution, there would not have been more violent rebellions in 2019 after the Mongkok "riot" in 2016 and the heavy sentences handed down to protesters by the Court of Appeal in 2017.

If we do not want social unrest, we must get to the root of the problem and implement the "five demands" step by step, so as to achieve fundamental reforms and win back the hearts of the people. 2019's anti-revision movement is indeed a continuation of 2014's Umbrella Movement, and even though the court may think that both movements are caused by a "perverse wind", I must clarify that the core of both movements is the pursuit of democracy and universal suffrage, and the people being the masters of their own house. In the District Council election on 24 November 2019, which is the closest thing to universal suffrage, nearly 3 million people voted, and the democratic camp won a huge victory, winning majority in 17 District Councils. As canaries in the monetary coal mine, we have repeatedly reminded the government to withdraw the extradition bill and fundamentally reform the system, and the march in Kowloon on 20 October was certainly an opportunity to reflect public opinion. Now, by imposing heavy penalties on us, the court is only punishing public opinion, trapping the canaries in a birdcage, or even stifling them in the palm of their hands, suffocating the freedom of expression.

The importance of persistence

As a result of the crackdown after the mass movement, we lost Apple Daily, the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, and the Civil Human Rights Front. Many of our democratic leaders and comrades who had contributed to the movement were imprisoned, and many of our friends who had been passionately involved in the movement had been forced to lay low under the threat of the National Security Law. I still believe that the faith of Hong Kong people and the glory of humanity seen in 2019 will remain unchanged. I will never forget the millions of people who braved the rain and the heat to resist tyranny and evil laws, demonstrating our unity of purpose; I will never forget the crowds of people who gave way to ambulances, demonstrating our civility; I will never forget the young people who sacrificed their lives, demonstrating our courage and bravery; I will never forget the silver-haired who took to the streets to protect the youth, demonstrating our care for each other; I will never forget the "five demands" and the 2019 District Council election, demonstrating our rationality and decency.

Your Honour, I have nothing to be ashamed of and no remorse for what I did on that day. It is my great honour to be in prison with my comrades and to be able to walk with the public after my release. If the rule of law were to lose its democratic foundation, the courts would have no choice but to accept the legal restrictions set by the autocratic regime and become a political tool to eliminate dissent at any time. As Lord Hoffmann, a non-permanent overseas judge of the Court of Final Appeal, said, civil disobedience from the conscience has a long and honourable tradition, and history will prove us right. I hope that my comrades in arms who walked with me in protests will keep their faith and live in love and truth in the midst of this difficult time.

Finally, as I did nine years ago, I would like to say something to those who oppose us, borrowing the words of American civil rights leader Reverend Martin Luther King: "We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you."

Peace be with me and my family, with Your Honour, and with the people of Hong Kong. There are no thugs, only tyranny; five demands, not one less! To god be the glory and to people be the glory!

The Fifth Defendant
Wong Ho Ming
19 August 2021

沒有MacBook Pro，沒有新AirPods，也沒有one more thing，雖然今年WWDC2021沒有任何硬件發佈，但一如既往，同樣有很多軟件上的更新，包括iOS 15、iPadOS 15、macOS Monterey、WatchOS 8等。當中最多人關心又最多更新的，就是iPhone的iOS 15，FaceTime功能大幅進化，並且同時支援Ｍac和iPad。另外，iPadOS有強化的multitasking多工處理，MacOS則有全新的Universal Control，都是一些實用又方便用家的新功能。

影片:
【我是南丫島人】23歲仔獲cafe免費借位擺一人咖啡檔 $6,000租住350呎村屋：愛這裏互助關係 (果籽 Apple Daily) (https://youtu.be/XSugNPyaXFQ)
【香港蠔 足本版】流浮山白蠔收成要等三年半 天然生曬肥美金蠔日產僅50斤 即撈即食中環名人坊蜜餞金蠔 西貢六福酥炸生蠔 (果籽 Apple Daily) (https://youtu.be/Fw653R1aQ6s)
【這夜給惡人基一封信】大佬茅躉華日夜思念 回憶從8歲開始：兄弟有今生沒來世 (壹週刊 Next) (https://youtu.be/t06qjQbRIpY)
【太子餃子店】新移民唔怕蝕底自薦包餃子 粗重功夫一腳踢 老闆刮目相看邀開店：呢個女人唔係女人(飲食男女 Apple Daily) https://youtu.be/7CUTg7LXQ4M)
【娛樂人物】情願市民留家唔好出街聚餐 鄧一君兩麵舖執笠蝕200萬 (蘋果日報 Apple Daily) (https://youtu.be/e3agbTOdfoY)

果籽 ：http://as.appledaily.com
籽想旅行：http://travelseed.hk
健康蘋台： http://applehealth.com.hk
動物蘋台： http://applepetform.com

#WWDC #iOS #FaceTime #iPad #MacOS
#果籽 #StayHome #WithMe #跟我一樣 #宅在家

售價：HK$23,800（EVO 150），HK$17,800（EVO 75），HK$6,500（EVO S）
查詢：Cambridge Audio（+852 2449 3822）
預約試聽：+852 2882 4000
Cambridge Audio Evo 系列規格詳情影片介紹：https://youtu.be/s8RGKrf32Mg
官方網站：https://www.cambridgeaudio.com/hkg/zh-hant/products/evo

Chapters
0:00 正式開始
0:50 開箱
3:37 App 示範
6:42 評測：操控性
7:47 評測：配搭 KEF R3
9:53 評測：配搭 B&W 706 S2
12:59 結語，下條片再見
---
如需商業轉載，敬請事先通知 feversoundcom@gmail.com
國仁個人頻道 http://bit.ly/2lyMecj
官方網站：http://www.feversound.com/

feverSound開咗MeWe喇：
專頁：https://mewe.com/p/feversoundcom

Facebook：
https://www.facebook.com/feversound1/
https://www.instagram.com/feversound/
https://bit.ly/2PjIeYA

免責聲明：片內產品規格包裝樣式功能，可因時間及貨品批次不同而相異，並以官方及代理最終發佈作準，feverSound.com並不承擔任何責任，不便之處敬請原諒

嘉賓專訪內容純屬所屬公司/ 個人意見，並不代表本網立場

#粵語YouTuber #HiFi #CambridgeAudio

孤獨又如何，喜歡不被大眾了解的小眾的音樂，往往是內向的人。
違和、凌亂、規則，按照自己的感覺，以最直接的方式構造屬於你和我的四分鐘世界。
#後搖 #數搖 #內向 #孤獨

studio recording ver. https://open.spotify.com/track/51JLynv9jaNiCSRGZpFV7P?si=26775a99571f4c50

A PRUNE DEER PRODUCTION
----------------
《co1 初》
Written by Prune Deer
Live Mixing & Recorded by Dominic Lee @grizzstudio

Prune Deer
Kwan Shing
Jimmy Ling
Nature Hin
SF Tang

Director
Sam Cheng @B&W Production
Nature Hin @ ngfongpictures

Production Manager
Sheling Chang @sheling @B&W Production
Tsang Ming Sum @tsangming122 @B&W Production

Production Assistant
Co @B&W Production @cogorphoto
Heiyo
Bello
Liu Kwok Kwan @liukwokkwan @dumdum_creation
Rachel Chan @r.a.c.h.e.l.l.l

DOP
Jonathan Wong @ UCYC

Camera Operator
Kwan Cheuk Wai @drumcheuk @B&W Production
Chau Yu @ b23_prod
Vic Shing @ Music Surveillance
Tsang Ming Sum @tsangming122 @B&W Production

1st AC
Asgard Wong @larc.asgard

2nd AC
ung Vincent
Chan Sze Sun
Jed Choi
Heiyo
Chung Tak Kuen

Gaffer
Chan Ka yee
Fung Vincent @ UCYC
Sam wa @ UCYC

Lighting Assistant
Chan Sze Sun
Jed Choi
Chung Tak Kuen

Audio team
Dominic Lee @grizzstudio @fatkin0418
Bu Chan @WaveRoomStudio
Lulu @_san_lu

Drum Tech/Roadie
Brian Shiu @UNISON

Styling
Emmy Tam @enam.t at @lwstudiostudio @B&W Production

Styling Assistant
Bello

Styling Sponsor
imply @implyofficial
4.02studio @4.02studio

Makeup & hair
Candice @ by_candiicexx

DIT
Vic Shing @ Music Surveillance

器材提供
UCYC Pictures Hong Kong Ltd.
one event
Music Surveillance
Luminluxfilm
grizzstudio
天下一恆運影視器材租賃有限公司

Special thanks
YEUNG CHUN YEE @ luminluxfilm
Andrew
Sam Wa
Zinchu @zinchu_drum @bungeedrum
Tones tailor @tonestailor
創意香港電影服務統籌科
Tai hok Sam
Foo tsz chun
Lai man chun
Chan kin ting
Wong Hoi Fung

Docu team
Ruck Lai @octus.xyz
Ming Yeung@octus.xyz
Jimi
Titus
Bill
Phoebe

Catering
90s Lazy

Marketing
Ruck Lai @octus.xyz
Ming Yeung @octus.xyz

Sponsor
生力清啤

Still Photos
Tsang Ming Sum @tsangming122 @B&W Production
Vic Shing @ Music Surveillance
Rachel Chan @r.a.c.h.e.l.l.l

▼ Follow Prune Deer 話梅鹿
Official HP : https://www.prunedeer.com
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/prunedeer
Instagram : https://www.instagram.com/prunedeer
Twitter : http://twitter.com/prunedeer
Spotify : https://open.spotify.com/artist/0V6yRXUk7qTPizan3VkUPU
Apple Music / iTunes : https://itunes.apple.com/us/artist/prune-deer/892275482