關於 as discussed中文 ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

***《請大家多多注意！》***
這篇想說明一下關於今天發生的盜用我身分及利用作疑似詐騙事件，及想請大家以後多多注意，小心不要被假帳騙取個人資料的。

今早一起來就收到來自朋友及大家各方的通知&詢問訊息，內容都是關於一個疑似是我的身分的個人FB帳號。
**再次澄清，該帳號並不是我本人所開的帳號！！！**
該個人帳號是利用了近似本專頁的帳號所開的，而名稱及頭像照片都是用了我的。
本專頁的帳號為 siutaoCOS，而該帳號則用了siutaoC0S，把cos中的英文字「O」轉為了數字「0」以混淆視聽。
當時該假帳的一則貼文內容為一些奇怪的中文及請大家在一個奇怪網站填寫表格，而該網站也是用了本人的身分，內容疑似是想要詐騙大家的個人資料（包括信用卡資料）。
本人發現後已即時發出澄清及請大家幫忙檢舉的貼文（即今天下午本專頁、本人個帳、本人IG上所發表的）
該假冒帳號的擁有者看到後，來給本專頁發來了DM，還反問我為什麼要搞砸他，最後還發出惡言反罵我。及後，在大家幫忙檢舉期間，該假冒帳號卻把其帳號的貼文、轉帖通通刪除，把頭像等等的都全部換掉，想要逃過FB審查。而FB審查到現在還是堅持為該帳號沒有問題。

到這刻我也無能為力了😢
非常感謝大家一起幫忙檢舉該假冒帳號，雖然還沒能成功檢舉，但以此希望警惕一下大家要小心謹慎，防止被詐騙😭🙏🏻💦
此次事件中如果你有曾經把個資給了假冒帳號的話，建議請立刻更改相關資料/帳號，加強保安，防範被盜用該資料/帳號的可能。

*****在此也向大家再次聲明，
本人不會隨便以任何個人帳號加好友，除非已事前作公開通知/私下通知/經過溝通達成共識。
（也希望大家體諒一下我也需要私人空間🙏🏻😢）
以FB專頁也只此一個，並沒其他分頁！！！（Singapore及Vietnam Fans Page為本人認可，不是什麼假帳。）
以及，除通販作用外，本人並不會要求大家提出個人資訊。該通販用的資訊也絕對不會交給第三方，不會外流！
還請大家以後也多多注意了！如有發現/遇到假冒帳號的話，請幫忙檢舉！😭🙏🏻*****

再次感謝大家支持、相信及幫忙！愛你們😭🙏🏻❤️

————————————

**<>**
This post will be describing the incident that has happened earlier today, and I would like everyone to be aware and not accidentally give away personal information to a fake account.

This morning when I woke up, I received notifications and questions from friends and everyone, regarding a Facebook account pretending to be mine. *I would like to remind everyone again that this account is not created by me!!!*
This account was recently created and used the same name and profile as my own. My page link is siutaoCOS, and this fake account used siutaoC0S, changing the capitalized [O] in the link name to the numeral [0] zero to befuddle everyone.

During that time, the account created a post that asked everyone to fill in their information in a suspicious website, which was created under a fake identity, attempting to scam personal and credit card information.
Upon discovery, I have posted clarifications and requested everyone to assist in reporting the post. My clarifications were posted on my page, Instagram and personal account.
The scammer messaged my page directly after my revealing that the account was a fake, and asked why I wanted to ruin him, and even harshly scolded me in return for no reason. After that, with the assistance of everyone, the scammer deleted all related information to the attempted scam and changed his profile and cover picture to avoid Facebook’s automated investigation system. In the end, Facebook declared that there was no issue with the scammer’s account.

At this point I was powerless to do anything. 😢
I would like to thank everyone’s efforts in reporting the account, and though it was not successful, I would like to take this opportunity to inform everyone to be aware, and not get scammed by impersonation efforts.😭🙏🏻💦
If by any chance you had filled in personal information or other information, please immediately change all passwords and information, and contact relevant agencies if necessary. This is to prevent misuse of your information and linked accounts.

*****I would also like to mention, that I would not randomly add friends into my personal account, unless it was a public notice, privately discussed or agreed upon.
(I would like everyone to understand that I need some personal space as well🙏🏻😢).
This is my only page on Facebook and I have no other pages!!! (The Singapore and Vietnam Fan Pages were approved by me, and they are not fake accounts or impersonators.)
Apart from direct sales, I will never request for information from anyone. This information from sales will not be disclosed to anyone else or to a third party! In the future, if anyone notices an impersonator or fake account, please help me to report them!😭🙏🏻******

Once again, I would like to thank everyone who has supported me, believed in me and helped out! Love you all! 😭🙏🏻❤️

福島核電廠驚見新汙染物 原能管制委員會警告 :「可能再次爆炸」！（03/10/2021 Newtalk 新頭殼）

（黃奕慈 綜合報導）今（10日）日本原子能管制委員會發布報告表示，東京電力公司在福島第一核電站內部發現了新的污染場所，且嚴重程度遠超乎預期，因此原本廢爐拆除計劃可能需要重新考慮。令人驚訝的是，福島第一核電廠的1號和3號機組核反應堆壓力容器排出的部分氣體發生了倒流，「有可能再次引發爆炸。」

根據《日本放送協會》今日報導指出，原子能管制委員會發布了一份「有關福島核事故的調查報告」，內容顯示出約7萬萬億貝克勒爾的輻射性物質可能附著在第一核電廠的2號和3號機組核反應堆的安全頂蓋上。

日本原子能管制委員會表示，由於污染程度遠超預期，工作人員將無法按原計劃拆除安全頂蓋，需要和東京電力公司一起重新考慮廢爐拆除計劃。這份報告還指出，福島第一核電廠的1、3號機組的核反應堆壓力容器排出的部分氣體倒流，由於其中含有氫氣，「可能會再次引發爆炸，還會讓汙染範圍擴大。」

此外，有一項最新的實驗顯示，如果福島第一核電廠的3號機組發生氫氣爆炸，還有可能會引燃核電廠內部的其他可燃氣體，導致連環爆炸。所以為了確保廢墟拆除工作的安全進行，東京電力公司表示將對設備進行更加詳細的檢測。

在2011年3月11日，東日本大地震引發的大海嘯，襲擊了位在海邊的福島第一核電站，該核電廠的發電設備被水淹，導致冷卻系統失靈。在6個反應堆中的3個發生了熔毀。在接下來的幾天裡，1號和3號反應堆多次發生氫氣爆炸，並在環境中外洩了大量放射性物質。

PS. 編按：日本NHK官網上 03/10 所刊載的相關報導全文如下：

福島 NEWS WEB
福島放送局 トップ

原子力規制委が事故調査の報告書

原子力規制委員会は、おととし再開した東京電力・福島第一原子力発電所の事故調査の報告書をまとめ、原子炉建屋の上部で激しい汚染が見つかるなどしたことから、今後の廃炉作業について東京電力と検討を進めるとしています。

原子力規制委員会は、放射線量が下がった場所を中心に２年前から事故調査を再開し、その結果を１０日、報告書にまとめました。

それによりますと、核燃料が溶け落ちるメルトダウンを起こした１号機から３号機の３基の原子炉にあった放射性物質のおよそ１割にあたるあわせて７京ベクレルが、２号機と３号機の建屋上部にあるシールドプラグと呼ばれるコンクリートの蓋に付着している可能性があることが新たにわかったということです。

規制委員会は汚染が予想以上に激しく、仮に廃炉に向けて蓋を取り外す場合、人が近寄って安全に作業することが極めて困難になるとして、被ばく対策を含めて今後の廃炉作業の方法について東京電力と検討を進めるとしています。

このほか、原子炉がある格納容器を守るため中の気体を外に放出する「ベント」という操作を試みた１号機と３号機では、気体の一部が配管を通じて建屋に逆流していたこともわかり、これにより建屋内の汚染を広げた可能性があると指摘しています。

また、逆流した気体には水素も含まれていて、水素爆発につながったおそれもあるとして、今後、設備の検証などを進める必要があるとしています。

水素爆発については映像を分析するなど初めて詳細な検証が行われ、３号機では最初の爆発に続き、水素とは別の可燃性ガスも混ざった爆発的な燃焼が連続して起きていた可能性が高いとしました。

規制委員会は今後も調査を継続するとしています。

NHK完整報導內容請見：
https://www3.nhk.or.jp/lnews/fukushima/20210310/6050013761.html

英文翻譯如下：
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has compiled a report on the accident investigation of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, which has been reopened, and found severe pollution at the top of the reactor building. We are going to proceed with the examination.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has resumed accident investigations two years ago, mainly in areas where radiation levels have dropped, and summarized the results in a report on the 10th.

According to this, about 10% of the radioactive materials in the three reactors of Units 1 to 3, which caused the meltdown of the nuclear fuel, totaling 7K Becquerel, were placed in the upper part of the buildings of Units 2 and 3. It is newly discovered that it may be attached to a concrete lid called a shield plug.

The Regulatory Commission said that the pollution was more severe than expected, and if the lid was removed for decommissioning, it would be extremely difficult for people to approach and work safely. Will be discussed with TEPCO.

In addition, at Units 1 and 3, which attempted an operation called "venting" to release the gas inside to protect the containment vessel where the reactor is located, part of the gas flowed back into the building through piping. It turns out that this may have spread the pollution inside the building.

In addition, the backflow gas also contains hydrogen, which may have led to a hydrogen explosion, and it is necessary to proceed with verification of equipment in the future.

Detailed verification of the hydrogen explosion was carried out for the first time, such as by analyzing the video, and it is possible that at Unit 3, following the first explosion, explosive combustion mixed with flammable gas other than hydrogen occurred continuously. Was high.

The Regulatory Commission says it will continue to investigate.

中文翻譯如下：

核監管委員會已經對福島第一核電站的事故調查進行了彙編，該報告已經重新開放，並在反應堆頂部發現了嚴重污染，我們將繼續進行檢查。

核監管委員會兩年前已恢復事故調查，主要是在輻射水平下降的地區，並在10日的報告中總結了結果。

據此，導致1號至3號機組的三個反應堆中導致核燃料融化的約10％的放射性物質（總計7K Becquerel）被放置在2號和3號機組的建築物的上部。是新發現的，它可能會附在一個稱為屏蔽塞的混凝土蓋上。

監管委員會說，污染比預期的還要嚴重，如果卸下蓋子進行退役，人們接近和安全工作將極為困難，將與東京電力公司進行討論。

另外，在1號和3號機組中，嘗試進行“排氣（venting)”作業以釋放內部氣體以保護反應堆所在的安全殼，部分氣體通過管道回流到建築物中。可能已將污染散佈在建築物內部。

此外，回流氣體中還包含氫氣，這可能導致氫氣爆炸，因此有必要在將來進行設備驗證。

首次對氫氣爆炸進行了詳細的驗證，例如通過分析視頻，並且在第一次爆炸後的3號機組中，可能會連續發生爆炸混合了除氫氣以外的易燃氣體的爆炸燃燒。

監管委員會表示將繼續調查。

Newtalk新頭殼報導的完整內容請見：
https://newtalk.tw/news/view/2021-03-10/547169

♡

今早為Asian Medical Students Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK)的新一屆執行委員會就職典禮作致詞分享嘉賓，題目為「疫情中的健康不公平」。
感謝他們的熱情款待以及為整段致詞拍了影片。以下我附上致詞的英文原稿：

It's been my honor to be invited to give the closing remarks for the Inauguration Ceremony for the incoming executive committee of the Asian Medical Students' Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK) this morning. A video has been taken for the remarks I made regarding health inequalities during the COVID-19 pandemic (big thanks to the student who withstood the soreness of her arm for holding the camera up for 15 minutes straight), and here's the transcript of the main body of the speech that goes with this video:

//The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, continues to be rampant around the world since early 2020, resulting in more than 55 million cases and 1.3 million deaths worldwide as of today. (So no! It’s not a hoax for those conspiracy theorists out there!) A higher rate of incidence and deaths, as well as worse health-related quality of life have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, including people of lower socioeconomic position, older persons, migrants, ethnic minority and communities of color, etc. While epidemiologists and scientists around the world are dedicated in gathering scientific evidence on the specific causes and determinants of the health inequalities observed in different countries and regions, we can apply the Social Determinants of Health Conceptual Framework developed by the World Health Organization team led by the eminent Prof Sir Michael Marmot, world’s leading social epidemiologist, to understand and delineate these social determinants of health inequalities related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

According to this framework, social determinants of health can be largely categorized into two types – 1) the lower stream, intermediary determinants, and 2) the upper stream, structural and macro-environmental determinants. For the COVID-19 pandemic, we realized that the lower stream factors may include material circumstances, such as people’s living and working conditions. For instance, the nature of the occupations of these people of lower socioeconomic position tends to require them to travel outside to work, i.e., they cannot work from home, which is a luxury for people who can afford to do it. This lack of choice in the location of occupation may expose them to greater risk of infection through more transportation and interactions with strangers. We have also seen infection clusters among crowded places like elderly homes, public housing estates, and boarding houses for foreign domestic helpers. Moreover, these socially disadvantaged people tend to have lower financial and social capital – it can be observed that they were more likely to be deprived of personal protective equipment like face masks and hand sanitizers, especially during the earlier days of the pandemic. On the other hand, the upper stream, structural determinants of health may include policies related to public health, education, macroeconomics, social protection and welfare, as well as our governance… and last, but not least, our culture and values. If the socioeconomic and political contexts are not favorable to the socially disadvantaged, their health and well-being will be disproportionately affected by the pandemic. Therefore, if we, as a society, espouse to address and reduce the problem of health inequalities, social determinants of health cannot be overlooked in devising and designing any public health-related strategies, measures and policies.

Although a higher rate of incidence and deaths have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, especially in countries with severe COVID-19 outbreaks, this phenomenon seems to be less discussed and less covered by media in Hong Kong, where the disease incidence is relatively low when compared with other countries around the world. Before the resurgence of local cases in early July, local spread of COVID-19 was sporadic and most cases were imported. In the earlier days of the pandemic, most cases were primarily imported by travelers and return-students studying overseas, leading to a minor surge between mid-March and mid-April of 874 new cases. Most of these cases during Spring were people who could afford to travel and study abroad, and thus tended to be more well-off. Therefore, some would say the expected social gradient in health impact did not seem to exist in Hong Kong, but may I remind you that, it is only the case when we focus on COVID-19-specific incidence and mortality alone. But can we really deduce from this that COVID-19-related health inequality does not exist in Hong Kong? According to the Social Determinants of Health Framework mentioned earlier, the obvious answer is “No, of course not.” And here’s why…

In addition to the direct disease burden, the COVID-19 outbreak and its associated containment measures (such as economic lockdown, mandatory social distancing, and change of work arrangements) could have unequal wider socioeconomic impacts on the general population, especially in regions with pervasive existing social inequalities. Given the limited resources and capacity of the socioeconomically disadvantaged to respond to emergency and adverse events, their general health and well-being are likely to be unduly and inordinately affected by the abrupt changes in their daily economic and social conditions, like job loss and insecurity, brought about by the COVID-19 outbreak and the corresponding containment and mitigation measures of which the main purpose was supposedly disease prevention and health protection at the first place. As such, focusing only on COVID-19 incidence or mortality as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities may leave out important aspects of life that contributes significantly to people’s health. Recently, my research team and I collaborated with Sir Michael Marmot in a Hong Kong study, and found that the poor people in Hong Kong fared worse in every aspects of life than their richer counterparts in terms of economic activity, personal protective equipment, personal hygiene practice, as well as well-being and health after the COVID-19 outbreak. We also found that part of the observed health inequality can be attributed to the pandemic and its related containment measures via people’s concerns over their own and their families’ livelihood and economic activity. In other words, health inequalities were contributed by the pandemic even in a city where incidence is relatively low through other social determinants of health that directly concerned the livelihood and economic activity of the people. So in this study, we confirmed that focusing only on the incident and death cases as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities is like a story half-told, and would severely truncate and distort the reality.

Truth be told, health inequality does not only appear after the pandemic outbreak of COVID-19, it is a pre-existing condition in countries and regions around the world, including Hong Kong. My research over the years have consistently shown that people in lower socioeconomic position tend to have worse physical and mental health status. Nevertheless, precisely because health inequality is nothing new, there are always voices in our society trying to dismiss the problem, arguing that it is only natural to have wealth inequality in any capitalistic society. However, in reckoning with health inequalities, we need to go beyond just figuring out the disparities or differences in health status between the poor and the rich, and we need to raise an ethically relevant question: are these inequalities, disparities and differences remediable? Can they be fixed? Can we do something about them? If they are remediable, and we can do something about them but we haven’t, then we’d say these inequalities are ultimately unjust and unfair. In other words, a society that prides itself in pursuing justice must, and I say must, strive to address and reduce these unfair health inequalities. Borrowing the words from famed sociologist Judith Butler, “the virus alone does not discriminate,” but “social and economic inequality will make sure that it does.” With COVID-19, we learn that it is not only the individuals who are sick, but our society. And it’s time we do something about it.

Thank you very much!//

Please join me in congratulating the incoming executive committee of AMSAHK and giving them the best wishes for their future endeavor!

Roger Chung, PhD
Assistant Professor, CUHK JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, @CUHK Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong 香港中文大學 - CUHK
Associate Director, CUHK Institute of Health Equity

[13N防風衣因疫情延至3月底出貨，未來周邊資訊和詳情請上13N.TV]
今天聖誕節，我到底都做了什麼...2020悶壞了。祝大家聖誕節快樂。What in the world did I just do on Christmas day. 2020's been rough.

Bike: Yamaha WR250X (R dirt conversion)
Bike: Triumph Daytona 675R

MotoVlog 232 摩托日記第兩百三十二篇

Outro Music: Trixtor - Just This Once
Other Music: Samme - Campanas
Other Music: Moments - Carol of the bells
Other Music: Fantoms - Always Something
Other Music: Moments - In Silence

討論和使用的影片器材 Video equipment as used and discussed:
Insta 360 One X2: https://bit.ly/3lQqiU2
Insta 360 One R: https://bit.ly/30EwU01
GoPro Hero 9: https://amz.run/41d1

之前拆裝的影片紀錄，原本的快拆卡死拆不掉，第一次拆鏈條比我想像中耗時阿。原本今年想開始玩林道，結果人算不如天算。
Really wanted to ride trail at the start of the year. Better late than never! Had to break the chain as the old master link was stuck.

Instagram: moto13n

Mod:
SM Pro WR250X to dirt wheel conversion
Tire: Dunlop 605
Sprocket: 13/47
Chain: DID VD 110 links

Bike: Yamaha WR250X to WR250R

MotoVlog 231 摩托日記第兩百三十一篇

Outro Music: Trixtor - Just This Once
Other Music: OBOY - Sandal

討論和使用的影片器材 Video equipment as used and discussed:
Insta 360 One X: https://bit.ly/338kigg
GoPro Hero 7: https://amzn.to/2PFHRZZ
GoPro Hero 8 : https://amzn.to/2JJ51uJ
GoPro Hero Max: https://amzn.to/2NCzXh6

[公告：防風外套延至三月底出貨，蝦皮和官網訂單追蹤請上 13N.TV]
這台車我好像聊了不少次，這次不是紙上談兵了！新時代跑車降臨
I've talked about this bike plenty of times. Here's the real deal now! A new era for middle weight sportsbike.

IG: moto13n

Bike: Aprilia RS660

MotoVlog 230 摩托日記第二百三十篇

Outro Music: Trixtor - Just This Once
Other Music: Crystalline - Z SCRZG

討論和使用的影片器材 Video equipment as used and discussed:
Insta 360 One X2: https://bit.ly/3lQqiU2
Insta 360 One R: https://bit.ly/30EwU01
GoPro Hero 9: https://amz.run/41d1