Search
//「沙特專家」Gary Cox一本入門經典《How to Be an Existentialist》(如何成為一個存在主義者)，讀畢大概可掌握基礎。除了有三、兩頁講「時間」Cox都承認是比較難，太令我困擾放棄了之外，其他講Choice、Bad Faith、Authenticity的主題環環相扣，淺白易懂。// bit.ly/3jzAakr
#果籽書齋 #二喬 #存在主義
==============
《果籽》TG Channel 👉🏻 t.me/appleseedhk
立即追蹤接收最新資訊
==============
🍎 8折全年睇《蘋果》即慳$121！
現有日費訂戶亦可轉訂： bit.ly/392KGKk
==============
📣 召集有心人！贊助學生免費睇蘋果
我撐學生 / 我是學生： bit.ly/2PibQs5
好巧 我另一個同學貼了中文版...........
「信耶穌不合科學。」一個哲學教授上課時說。
他頓了一頓，叫了一個新生站起來，說：「某某同學，你是基督徒嗎？」
...Continue Reading
Professor : You are a Christian, aren’t you, son ?
Student : Yes, sir.
Professor: So, you believe in GOD ?
Student : Absolutely, sir.
Professor : Is GOD good ?
Student : Sure.
Professor: Is GOD all powerful ?
Student : Yes.
Professor: My brother died of cancer even though he prayed to GOD to heal him. Most of us would attempt to help others who are ill. But GOD didn’t. How is this GOD good then? Hmm?
(Student was silent.)
Professor: You can’t answer, can you ? Let’s start again, young fella. Is GOD good?
Student : Yes.
Professor: Is satan good ?
Student : No.
Professor: Where does satan come from ?
Student : From … GOD …
Professor: That’s right. Tell me son, is there evil in this world?
Student : Yes.
Professor: Evil is everywhere, isn’t it ? And GOD did make everything. Correct?
Student :Yes
Professor: So who created evil ?
(Student did not answer.)
Professor: Is there sickness? Immorality? Hatred? Ugliness? All these terrible things exist in the world, don’t they?
Student : Yes, sir.
Professor: So, who created them ?
(Student had no answer.)
Professor: Science says you have 5 Senses you use to identify and observe the world around you. Tell me, son, have you ever seen GOD?
Student : No, sir.
Professor: Tell us if you have ever heard your GOD?
Student : No , sir.
Professor: Have you ever felt your GOD, tasted your GOD, smell your GOD? Have you ever had any sensory perception of GOD for that matter?
Student : No, sir. I’m afraid I haven’t.
Professor: Yet you still believe in Him?
Student : Yes.
Professor : According to Empirical, Testable, Demonstrable Protocol, Science says your GOD doesn’t exist. What do you say to that, son?
Student : Nothing. I only have my faith.
Professor: Yes, faith. And that is the problem Science has.
Student : Professor, is there such a thing as heat?
Professor: Yes.
Student : And is there such a thing as cold?
Professor: Yes.
Student : No, sir. There isn’t.
(The lecture theatre became very quiet with this turn of events.)
Student : Sir, you can have lots of heat, even more heat, superheat, mega heat, white heat, a little heat or no heat. But we don’t have anything called cold. We can hit 458 degrees below zero which is no heat, but we can’t go any further after that. There is no such thing as cold. Cold is only a word we use to describe the absence of heat. We cannot measure cold. Heat is energy. Cold is not the opposite of heat, sir, just the absence of it.
(There was pin-drop silence in the lecture theater.)
Student : What about darkness, Professor? Is there such a thing as darkness?
Professor: Yes. What is night if there isn’t darkness?
Student : You’re wrong again, sir. Darkness is the absence of something. You can have low light, normal light, bright light, flashing light. But if you have no light constantly, you have nothing and its called darkness, isn’t it? In reality, darkness isn’t. If it is, were you would be able to make darkness darker, wouldn’t you?
Professor: So what is the point you are making, young man ?
Student : Sir, my point is your philosophical premise is flawed.
Professor: Flawed ? Can you explain how?
Student : Sir, you are working on the premise of duality. You argue there is life and then there is death, a good GOD and a bad GOD. You are viewing the concept of GOD as something finite, something we can measure. Sir, Science can’t even explain a thought. It uses electricity and magnetism, but has never seen, much less fully understood either one. To view death as the opposite of life is to be ignorant of the fact that death cannot exist as a substantive thing.
Death is not the opposite of life: just the absence of it. Now tell me, Professor, do you teach your students that they evolved from a monkey?
Professor: If you are referring to the natural evolutionary process, yes, of course, I do.
Student : Have you ever observed evolution with your own eyes, sir?
(The Professor shook his head with a smile, beginning to realize where the argument was going.)
Student : Since no one has ever observed the process of evolution at work and cannot even prove that this process is an on-going endeavor. Are you not teaching your opinion, sir? Are you not a scientist but a preacher?
(The class was in uproar.)
Student : Is there anyone in the class who has ever seen the Professor’s brain?
(The class broke out into laughter. )
Student : Is there anyone here who has ever heard the Professor’s brain, felt it, touched or smelt it? No one appears to have done so. So, according to the established Rules of Empirical, Stable, Demonstrable Protocol, Science says that you have no brain, sir. With all due respect, sir, how do we then trust your lectures, sir?
(The room was silent. The Professor stared at the student, his face unfathomable.)
Professor: I guess you’ll have to take them on faith, son.
Student : That is it sir … Exactly ! The link between man & GOD is FAITH. That is all that keeps things alive and moving.
P.S.
I believe you have enjoyed the conversation. And if so, you’ll probably want your friends /colleagues to enjoy the same, won’t you?
Forward this to increase their knowledge … or FAITH.
By the way, that student was EINSTEIN
說明甚麼是「存在」（being／l'être）時，他描述了一滴蜜糖滴入一瓶蜜糖，慢慢被吸納，然後再也分不開來的狀態；討論「自欺」（bad faith, mauvaise ... ... <看更多>
哲學 新媒體Philosophy Medium ... // 電影中的每個角色卻都患上了沙特口中的「壞的信念」(bad faith)，或自欺。他們堅信自己存在擁有一個唯一的目標，那就是 ... ... <看更多>
bad faith哲學 在 [試題] 104-2 彭文本當代歐陸哲學期中考- 看板NTU-Exam 的推薦與評價
課程名稱︰當代歐陸哲學
課程性質︰
課程教師︰彭文本
開課學院：文學院
開課系所︰哲學系
考試日期（年月日）︰105.04.25
考試時限（分鐘）：10-12
試題 :
以下四個題組(ABCD)，請選擇4題作答，其中至少必須包括3個題組，
請註明題號(A1,B2..)。每題25分
A.
(1)「甚麼是存在？」(what is being?)與「甚麼是存在的意義？」(what is the of
being?)兩個問題有何不同的哲學意義？海德格如何處理這兩個問題？請說明你的看法。
(2)請問《存在與時間》一書的「世界性」(worldliness; Weltlichkeit)與「此在」(
Dasein)之間的關係是甚麼？你贊成海德格的說法嗎？為什麼？
B.
(1)何謂「前反思的自我意識」(pre-reflective self-consciousness)？沙特如何論證
的確存在這樣的意識？你贊成他的主張嗎？請說明理由。
(2)甚麼是沙特說的「壞的信念」(bad faith)？請舉一實例說明，並評論沙特這個理論。
C.
(1)Merleau-Ponty的body-subject是甚麼意思？他用哪些理由支持這個主張？你是否贊成
他的說法？
(2)Merleau-Ponty如何詮釋笛卡爾的Cogito的確定性？你贊成他的詮釋嗎？為什麼？
D.
(1)海德格和沙特對於「存在」與「虛無」的關係有何不同的看法？你自己對這個問題有
何看法？
(2)沙特和Merleau-Ponty對於兩性關係有何不同的看法？你贊成誰？為什麼？
考試時間兩個小時，不能使用參考資料
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.112.25.106
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NTU-Exam/M.1461585537.A.1F1.html
... <看更多>