(如果不想看我打的英文可以直接拉到下面看我另外打的中文)
Hello my people from Bao country just wanna show u guys the animation for the motions test of the pets Niku and Baku, and the super fierce attack motion of the Director Bao character. hopefully the game can be released without a hitch next month.
if it has decent sales I’m gonna have a talk with the engineers and the animators to have them add a bunch of bs functions.
And if everything goes well I’m gonna add in the “A-pei character that everyone loves so much, and there’ll also be a giant-sized Tibetan Mastiff : king of fat u can have as a pet.
I’ll let everyone know when it’s released.
There were people that used to look down on me, thinking that I ain’t worth shit being only able to draw.
I’ve encountered a self-centered, conceited mofo before during work,She was all saying that she wanted to collab with me to make a game but all she really wanted to do was to use my rep to do her own thing.
That fucking asshole thought she was the shit and everyone should bow down to her ass. She has fucking broken English skills but she was all like “I’m the fucking greatest in the world.”
She used to talk about how her mom opened up an English cram school for her, some shits about her studying abroad in England for fucking 9 weeks and that she’s da shit for doing so, and also she kept bragging that even the CEO thinks her English is very good.
But guess what tho, her retarded ass can’t even speak or write in proper English. She fucking not only spoke with a retarded accent but her grammar is all over the place, but yet she had the balls to bitch and laugh at others when they make a mistake in English, saying shit like “Didn’t that guy study in England, how come his writings are crap?”
And she would even use onomatopoeia phrases like “ewww” or “eek” or “ouch” to prove that her English is “authentic.”
U know what tho, if ur English is that good there’s no fucking need for u to show off like this or use berate others.
One time, I had enough and wrote a long ass complaint to the boss(About work stuff), that made her shut up for good cause the fucking retard wasn’t able to understand a word of that letter.
That bitch thought she’s better than everyone else and she’s not shy to it.
What’s make matters worse is that she hates dogs cause she thinks dogs are filthy animals.
When my dog Baku passed away she made some nasty remarks that I’ll never forgot and forgive her.
Honest to God I’ve never seen this kind of worthless piece of scum in life, that fucktard is the really the worst kind of piece of crap that I’ve ever met in my life.
Oh yea that stupid-ass motherfucking retard even once said that she was gonna work in Europe, but it’s all bs cause she aint even passed the job interview.
My violin teacher knows this retard too. My violin teacher was like: “dang girl this is hands down the worst kind of bitch being on earth”
Sorry for typing all this shit, just couldn’t stop once I got started.
I hope everyone supports the game that is about to be released.
My colleagues in Europe and I are super thankful of u guys ahhh!
給大家看一下泥褲和巴褲動作測試的動畫
還有寶總監角色超猛的攻擊動作
希望能在下個月順利發行遊戲
如果賣得不錯我就要跟工程師和動畫師吵鬧
要他們加入一些北爛的功能
如果順利一定會加入大家喜歡的阿培當角色
還有阿培最愛的超巨大的獒犬帝肥(阿肥)當寵物
到時遊戲釋出了再跟大家說
曾經有些人一直看衰我看不起我
因為我不喜歡念書上課都在睡覺
我不是不會念書是我不想念而已
他們覺得我只會畫圖沒屁用以後會餓死
只有我阿嬤支持我常常跟一些牌友炫耀
說我孫子畫的好漂亮啊之類的
但大部分的人都覺得我以後會沒出息
我之前的工作遇過一個非常自以為是又自私又跩的同事
說很想要跟我一起做遊戲然後利率對半分
我那時就覺得這個人心機很重為何我要授權給妳
我知道她只是想要利用我的名氣有夠現實的
(還很跩說不做也沒差啊我不求妳我有收集其他作家的資料等等)
那個混蛋覺得自己很唱秋
其他人都是白癡都很笨她很看不起別人
她曾經跟我說現在的人基因越來越差所以智商都很低
每天上班一副我超屌不屑跟大家講話的樣子
那傢伙英文明明很爛還在那邊很囂張
說什麼她媽以前為了她還開英文補習班
說她去英國遊學九個禮拜很屌
說老闆覺得她英文很好(老闆是加拿大華人)
幹放屁 講話文法錯一大堆王八蛋
她還會嘲笑其他人英文很差很爛
說英文差的人沒資格升上更高的職位
說那個誰誰誰知道不是去英國唸書
怎麼打出這種爛英文啊之類的
那傢伙還會故意學外國人的噁或其他語助詞(例如好痛之類)
假裝自己是純正的在海外生活的華人
我覺得英文這種東西夠用就好
如果你的英文真的很強很屌
你他媽的就沒有必要像這樣炫耀或斥責別人
有一次我因為在工作上的事情很煩(上面的人一直塞東西給我)
我給我們CEO寫了一長篇全英文訊息抱怨和建議(關於工作)
然後我傳給她看她就閉嘴了(我很確定她沒看或是她用GOOGLE翻譯)
幹因為她根本看不懂全部的文章王八蛋
那人也看不起別人覺得自己很屌
一點都不會覺得不好意思
最糟糕的是她超討厭狗
她覺得狗很噁心很骯髒
她說她這輩子最討厭狗
在我的狗巴褲過世時她還對我說了超狠毒的話
我永遠不會忘記也永遠不會原諒她
老實說我一輩子沒看過這種爛貨
真的是我遇過人品最差最自私的垃圾
喔幹那傢伙曾經說要去歐洲工作等等
在那邊唱秋結果面試根本沒過
我小提琴老師也知道這個王八蛋
她說天啊這是世界上最爛的人類
真對不起打了這麼多狗屁
真是一打就停不下來真的很氣
希望大家支持我們即將上市的遊戲
我和我的歐洲同事們都超感謝你們
同時也有10000部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル,也在其Youtube影片中提到,...
「broken down意思」的推薦目錄:
- 關於broken down意思 在 寶總監的寶之國與他的狗王子 Empire of Director Bao & Niku & Baku Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於broken down意思 在 DJ荳子 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於broken down意思 在 葉漢浩 Alex Ip Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於broken down意思 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於broken down意思 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於broken down意思 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於broken down意思 在 和Cindy學英文- 跟大家分享我都翻譯筆記~ break ... - Facebook 的評價
broken down意思 在 DJ荳子 Facebook 的最佳解答
7月份節目歌單【好事自在Latte】
⛅️7/31(三)
2:03:36 PMJust Dance & Just Distu/Lady Gaga
2:07:23 PMPOSA POSA/松田丸子
2:11:30 PM嗆司嗆司/羅志祥
2:18:41 PMshut up/Greyson Chance
2:21:26 PM一光年/5666
2:26:04 PMBack to You/BEAST
2:33:46 PM光年之外/文慧如/邱鋒澤
2:37:35 PMCriminal/ Britney Spears
2:42:24 PM藍天/圖騰
2:48:20 PMmy all.../小柳由紀
2:54:21 PM犀利Girl/Spexial
3:04:03 PM愛不對人/江蕙
3:07:20 PM我捨不得/何維健
3:11:49 PMMalibu/Miley Cyrus
3:18:19 PMMiss you/M-Flo/Melody/山下智久
3:24:08 PM遇見你/阿喜
3:27:46 PM先不要/陳漢典
3:33:58 PMI Believe I Can Fly/Ronan Keating
3:38:38 PM走味的咖啡/林晏如
3:42:45 PM一起去跑步/宇宙人
3:50:25 PMnobody but me/Michael Buble
3:54:30 PM就想和你在一起/小旺福
4:03:57 PM愛我/柯以敏
4:08:12 PM謎之音/曾沛慈
4:12:34 PMSomebody To Love/BIGBANG
4:18:39 PMLabels or Love /Fergie
4:22:21 PM9453/玖壹壹
4:30:50 PM洋蔥/丁噹
4:36:58 PMLove Is Over/德永英明
4:44:40 PMSo Many People/Two Door Cinema club
4:49:27 PM獨一無二的女孩/謝沛恩
4:53:08 PMEverybody Woohoo/吳青峰/9m88
🐳7/30(二)
2:04:12 PMLollipop 棒棒糖/倖田來未
2:07:31 PMSuper Model/S.H.E
2:11:05 PMGet Out/MP 魔幻力量
2:17:37 PMPink Magic/SUPER JINIOR-藝聲
2:20:47 PM分享愛/郭富城
2:27:59 PM第一次/光良
2:32:15 PM微戀愛/暉倪
2:37:52 PMWait/Maroon 5
2:40:57 PM美/王力宏
2:47:29 PMYou'll See/Madonna
2:53:04 PM時尚狗/伍佰
3:03:56 PM我上大聲/賴銘偉
3:07:39 PM陌生人/Soler
3:11:44 PMIt's My Party/Jessie J
3:18:25 PMKingdom of The Pretty/Bonnie Bailey
3:23:54 PM2020愛你愛妳/By2
3:31:39 PM只要你快樂/汪佩蓉
3:36:14 PM虹色/絢香
3:39:50 PMPerfect/MFM
3:46:43 PMFalling/李尚恩
3:49:18 PM風和日麗/自然捲
3:54:25 PML.O.V.E/郭采潔
4:04:03 PM從來不肯對你說/林志炫
4:09:51 PM你喔/蘇打綠
4:13:58 PMDiamonds/Rihanna
4:21:57 PM鏡像世界/陳惠婷
4:26:15 PMTHE OTHER SIDE/Jason Derulo
4:33:41 PM喜歡/古巨基
4:39:14 PMShow Me/Jessica Sutta
4:46:11 PM最佳前任/品冠
4:49:13 PM風/可苦可樂
4:54:06 PM萬個捨不得/莊心妍
🍧7/29(一)
14:04:04講不聽/張韶涵
14:07:44走開 你哪位/關詩敏
14:11:08Timber/Pitbull/Ke$ha
14:18:06陽光燦爛的原因/鄭茵聲
14:22:26春泥/庾澄慶
14:26:32Dip!Dip!Dip!/拉格菲爾
14:34:20一舞鍾情/A-Lin
14:38:31For The First Time/John Legend
14:46:50Come to Mami/袁詠琳/MP 魔幻力量
14:49:54Amazing-Bad Lady/Cross Gene
14:53:44有你的快樂/王若琳
15:04:03男人KTV/黃文星
15:08:43體面/于文文
15:13:18旅人~Voyager/V6
15:24:29On the floor/JENNIFER LOPEZ
15:29:01Mr.Q/蔡依林
15:36:01隨意/郭靜
15:39:09快樂鳥日子/康晉榮
15:46:35星星/BTOB
15:51:25第一天/孫燕姿
15:55:31娃娃國/Sonic Deadhorse
16:03:56夢醒時分/陳淑樺
16:07:46Goodnight/李幸倪/BCW
16:11:52Unsteady/X Ambassadors
16:17:58Love Story/Taylor Swift
16:21:01I Feel So Good/妮可醬
16:30:04我很好/劉若英
16:34:26不再相愛的一天/ROY KIM
16:39:32BRAVE IT OUT/GENERATIONS
16:45:52盲點/郭修彧
16:50:24來愛我啦/徐若瑄
16:53:59Na Na Na/One Direction
💫7/26(五)
2:04:04 PM隔壁某某/孔令奇
2:07:17 PM辦不到/張靚穎/大嘴巴
2:10:28 PMHey Sexy Lady/Shaggy
2:16:38 PM那女孩對我說/黃義達
2:21:03 PM轉身以後/小男孩樂團
2:24:48 PMMaria/LoveHolic
2:31:55 PM愛斯基摩/蔡黃汝
2:35:21 PMI Like It/安立奎
2:40:17 PM你的樣子/齊秦
2:48:20 PM我們/陳奕迅
2:53:39 PMWe Got Time/時尚一派
3:04:03 PM黑白舞/張文綺
3:07:43 PMPlayer/C.T.O
3:10:53 PMTe Aviso Te Anuncio/Shakira
3:17:33 PM兩難/戴佩妮
3:21:33 PMTimeLess Affection/久保田利伸
3:30:00 PMtake a bow/Rihanna
3:33:41 PM辣台妹/頑童MJ116
3:38:04 PM謝謝你曾經讓我悲傷/原子邦妮
3:45:10 PM流明/HUSH
3:48:10 PMYoungblood/5 Seconds Of Summer
3:52:38 PM你看你看月亮的臉/孟庭葦
4:03:56 PM我是真的愛你/李宗盛
4:08:18 PM一半/萬芳
4:12:28 PMThe World of OZ/酷懶之味Clazziq
4:19:03 PMMad Love/Mabel
4:21:47 PM想你想你/王心凌
4:30:07 PM殘酷月光/林宥嘉
4:34:30 PM為你流的淚/侯湘婷
4:39:24 PMYellow/木村kaela
4:46:00 PM你想成為什麼樣的人/陳威全
4:50:02 PM戀愛應援團/安心亞
4:53:35 PMCall me maybe/Carly Rae Jepsen
💃7/25(四)
14:04:04POSA POSA/松田丸子
14:08:08大開眼界/羅志祥
14:11:27If We Ever Meet Again/Timbaland
14:19:12Catch The Wave/Def Tech
14:24:00無樂不作/范逸臣
14:31:54至少還有你/林憶蓮
14:36:21盲點/郭修彧
14:41:50I Love It/Icona Pop/CharlTHIS
14:47:41Beautiful/BEAST
14:52:22想要跟你飛/鳳飛飛
15:04:03拍謝啦/PiA吳蓓雅
15:08:18黃昏/周傳雄
15:13:45Men Are No Good /WINTERPLAY
15:21:15國王操場/絲襪小姐
15:24:57眾神LOOK YOU/棒球熊
15:34:33射手/MP 魔幻力量
15:38:26像我這樣的人/Mamamoo
15:44:46演員/薛之謙
15:50:11快樂搜尋/潘嘉麗
15:53:09DOING IT/Charli XCX
16:03:56愛情限時批/伍佰
16:06:35海浪/黃品源
16:11:21七夕祭典/手越增田
16:17:08觸電/黃宇曛
16:20:38情字這條路/潘越雲
16:25:39我愛你Beach/BOXING
16:34:07Falling Free 完全墜落/Madonna
16:40:24愛極限/許慧欣
16:47:34倒霉農場/Lulu黃路梓茵
16:50:56Let's Lollipop/阿Ken/納豆
16:53:26bye bye/BENI
👩🎤7/24(三)
2:04:11 PMMove Your Body/Sia
2:08:09 PM討厭 Tell Me/郭美美
2:15:34 PMWolf At Your Door/Chloe x Halle
2:19:26 PMAlways Online/林俊傑
2:28:06 PMHoney/郭書瑤
2:31:20 PM戀愛祭典/NEWS
2:36:37 PM葉子/張智成
2:45:16 PM你是不是不是人/管罄
2:48:49 PMMr.Boogie/f(x)
2:52:54 PM愛的初體驗/張震嶽
3:03:56 PM空笑夢/蔡振南
3:08:53 PM當我們在同一個世界/黃綺珊/蕭敬騰
3:13:20 PMArmy Of Me/Christina AguilLra
3:19:43 PM我喜歡妳走起路來的樣子/李英宏
3:24:01 PMJewel/Cash Cash/Nikki
3:31:54 PM下雨天/張傑
3:36:24 PMRemember/APINK
3:44:43 PM日不落/潘裕文
3:48:28 PM壁咚(未完成)孫子涵
3:53:29 PM人魚/安室奈美惠
4:04:03 PM一見鍾情/藍心湄
4:07:57 PM最佳前任/品冠
4:10:54 PM忘不了此刻的你/陽光直人
4:18:09 PMI Don't Care/Ed Sheeran
4:21:45 PM心跳/弦子
4:29:59 PM我多麼羨慕你/張洪量
4:33:23 PM不好意思/卜星慧
4:38:34 PMLUCIFER/SHINee
4:45:43 PMTalk/Two Door Cinema club
4:50:08 PM雷達/蔡詩蕓
4:53:39 PM給我一杯/余文樂
👄7/23(二)
2:04:05 PM跟我一起怪/神木與瞳
2:07:48 PM了不起/張惠妹
2:11:31 PMUnder Contro/Calvin Harris
2:17:56 PMFeedback/BoA
2:21:09 PMMiss壞/周湯豪
2:30:35 PM那些年/胡夏
2:36:36 PMBack To You/Louis Tomlinson
2:45:09 PM幸福之歌/Supper Moment
2:49:58 PMSexy,Free & Single/SUPER JUNIOR
3:04:03 PM感謝你/趙傳
3:08:21 PM不是時候/江美琪
3:12:38 PMWhistle/Flo Rida
3:19:34 PM愈慢愈美麗/蔡依林
3:22:30 PMTABOO/倖田來未
3:31:34 PM盲點/郭修彧
3:35:56 PMSign Of The Times/Harry Styles
3:41:28 PMI PROMISE YOU/Wanna One
3:48:26 PM誰是最愛/陳小春/蜜雪薇琪
3:52:25 PM愛情/莫文蔚
4:03:56 PM光陰的故事/羅大佑
4:07:33 PM星星墜落時/汪蘇瀧
4:12:23 PMGive It 2 Me/Madonna
4:20:07 PM趕快打電話/糯米團
4:23:16 PMWake me up.Before you go/Wham!
4:31:59 PM小薇/黃品源
4:35:08 PM我在這裡快樂/紀文惠
4:39:39 PMFrench Kiss/泫雅
4:46:07 PM死定了/自由發揮
4:49:51 PM自成一派/鄧福如
4:52:51 PMFollow Me/E-girls
🗣7/22(一)
2:04:11 PM你以為/宇宙人
2:07:32 PMSay Yeah/藍心湄/謝和弦
2:10:49 PMBeautiful Trauma/P!nk
2:18:20 PM上了癮/信
2:21:47 PM旅行的意義/陳綺貞
2:31:39 PM飛向陽光飛向你/脫拉庫
2:35:14 PMGirlfriend/Icona Pop
2:39:10 PMThe Tree of Life/方大同
2:45:55 PMParty queen/濱崎步
2:50:57 PM花季未了/張信哲
3:03:56 PM一支小雨傘/洪榮宏
3:07:16 PM不敢/閻奕格
3:11:57 PMHow Do You Sleep/Sam Smith
3:19:30 PM決定愛你/徐若瑄
3:23:43 PMSoul To Soul/S.E.S
3:31:56 PM夜太黑/林憶蓮
3:36:34 PMLemon/米津玄師
3:40:43 PM大人vs小孩/電話亭
3:47:52 PMLove Myself/Hailee Steinfel
3:53:42 PM喜歡你/鄧紫棋
4:04:02 PM回心轉意/黃鶯鶯
4:08:50 PM你會在哪呢/ 蕭敬騰
4:13:40 PMCalling/B'z
4:22:18 PM未接來電/C.T.O
4:25:36 PMCan't Be Tamed/Miley Cyrus
4:33:20 PM牡丹江/南拳媽媽
4:38:21 PMHymn For The Weekend/Coldplay
4:46:15 PMHan Bok Ha Se Yeo 要幸福/夏宇童
4:49:50 PM綜藝小弟小/強辯樂團
4:53:27 PMTake U High/SS501
☕7/19(五)
2:04:04 PM火鳥功/陶吉吉
2:07:44 PM再見螢火蟲/王菲
2:12:46 PMGood Grief/Bastille
2:18:57 PM裝睡的人/邵雨薇
2:23:13 PM心有獨鍾/陳曉東
2:27:46 PMTrouble Maker/Trouble Maker
2:34:46 PM愛你一萬年/周渝民
2:38:18 PM戀愛花蕾/倖田來未
2:42:32 PM如果雨之後/周興哲
2:50:43 PMThe Middle/Zedd/Maren
2:53:45 PM不好說/許書豪
3:04:03 PM心所愛的人/蔡小虎
3:08:13 PM看走眼/弦子
3:11:50 PMPretty Woman/Robbie Williams
3:17:48 PM初吻/2moro
3:20:53 PMHoliday/DJ Antoine/Akon
3:27:34 PM聽見下雨的聲音/魏如昀
3:32:01 PM為了愛 夢一生/王傑
3:36:32 PMSUN DANCE/Aimer
3:45:17 PM碰碰愛/何維健
3:48:55 PMCRAYON/G-DRAGON
3:53:39 PM讓我感受這夜晚/唐貓
4:03:56 PM哭過的天空/蘇慧倫
4:08:55 PM每每/陳大天
4:12:46 PMTomorrow/IZ*ONE
4:19:00 PMCan't Get You Out Of My Head/Kylie Minogue
4:22:57 PM愛無赦/蔡依林
4:30:46 PM天空/孫燕姿
4:34:57 PM聽說你找到了快樂/林育群
4:40:45 PMBang Bang/Lady Sovereign
4:47:47 PM換日線/紀文惠
4:51:00 PM粉Happy/左左右右
4:53:45 PMBad Girl Good Girl/Miss A
💎7/18(四)
2:04:05 PM在你左右/吳莫愁
2:07:29 PMWe Together/林俊傑
2:11:49 PMGirl女孩/Duffy 黛菲
2:17:28PMSHOOT IT OUT/GENERATIONS
2:22:12 PMCAT and MOUSE/By2
2:29:18 PM回去吧/方炯鑌
2:32:49 PM愛了很久的朋友/田馥甄
2:37:10 PM明天見 Sweet Dreams/EXO-CBX
2:41:21 PM無情的情書/動力火車
2:50:09 PMMake Me Feel/Janelle Monae
2:53:15 PMMoonlight/潘瑋柏/袁婭維
3:04:03 PM蚵仔煎/陳有娜
3:08:01 PMHug Yourself/郭修彧
3:11:50 PMBang Dem Sticks/Meghan Trainor
3:18:51 PM宇宙的邊緣/原子邦妮
3:23:36 PMTogether/Pet Shop Boys
3:30:45 PM對的人/莊心妍
3:35:13 PM愛的就是你/王力宏
3:39:56 PM永不放棄Neva Eva/島谷瞳
3:47:05 PM破吉他/張震嶽
3:52:02 PMDream/李遐怡
4:03:56 PM愛我到今生/藍心湄
4:08:49 PMKisses/松隆子
4:12:50 PM甜甜的/周杰倫
4:19:41 PMI SHOULD HAVE KISSED YOU/One Direction
4:23:13 PMTonight Tonight/柯有倫/解放浪漫
4:30:33 PM太美麗/陶吉吉
4:35:22 PM夢見/王艷薇
4:39:40 PMCherry Pop/AOA
4:46:04 PM怨偶/MC HotDog/艾怡良
4:49:49 PM信者得愛/鄭秀文
4:53:31 PMVacation/G.R.L.
🍿7/17(三)
2:04:11 PM熱/張靚穎
2:07:42 PMMy Dilemma/Selena Gomez
2:10:45 PM哎呀/吳建豪
2:19:07 PMJenny of Oldstones/Florence + The Machine
2:22:11 PM愛從昨夜就停了/黃大煒
2:30:32 PM泰客任務/旺福
2:33:59 PMBody Moves/DNCE
2:39:00 PM小世界/季欣霈
2:47:15 PM過路人/田亞霍/蔡恩雨
2:53:02 PMNO ONE/Alicia Keys
3:03:56 PM惜別的海岸/曾心梅
3:08:11 PMSomebody Loves Somebody/Celine Dion
3:11:45 PMRunning In Place/廖柏雅
3:18:20 PM東岸/BCW/家家
3:22:20 PM蓋世英雄/王力宏
3:25:54 PMLOVE SO SOFT/Kelly Clarkson
3:33:36 P我願意/楊永聰
3:40:07 PM寓言/張韶涵
3:44:09 PMSwing/U-KNOW允浩/BoA
3:50:18 PMMy love/安室奈美惠
3:54:14 PM愛不愛我/大嘴巴
4:04:03 PM奢求/堂娜
4:08:22 PM是緣/楊宗緯
4:12:48 PMDearest/濱崎步
4:20:57 PMWake Up Call/Maroon 5
4:24:07 PM冷水澡/黃立行
4:31:22 PMFor No Reason/王若琳
4:36:57 PMBoom Boom Pow/The Black Eyed pea
4:45:17 PMCan You Feel the Love Tonight/Beyonce
4:48:16 PM不科學公寓/魏如昀
4:52:49 PM彈起來/范瑋琪
🍹7/16(二)
2:04:05 PMMore Water/Waterman
2:06:54 PM五虎/慢慢說樂團
2:10:14 PMAll of your life/Backstreet
2:17:23 PMANGEL/IZ
2:20:59 PM灰色地帶/符瓊音
2:29:55 PM非你莫屬/TANK
2:34:37 PM遠方/林亭翰
2:39:39 PM安啦沒問題/嵐
2:47:40 PMGreen Light/Lorde
2:52:38 PM沒那麼簡單/黃小琥
3:04:03 PM咱攏要幸福/吳申梅
3:08:10 PM我沒有瘋/張芸京
3:13:07 PMDo-Re-Mi/SUPER JUNIOR
3:19:56 PM城市狂響/許書豪
3:23:31 PM那不是雪中紅/JPM
3:27:07 PMYour Love/Nicole Scherzin
3:34:21 PM海嘯/庾澄慶
3:39:00 PMBe the One/nano
3:43:23 PM走跳/頑童MJ116
3:50:16 PM歌舞伎町女王/椎名林檎
3:54:12 PM很自己/伍家輝
4:03:56 PM用盡一生的愛/張克帆
4:08:47 PM不應該勇敢/蘇盈之
4:13:05 PMEASY COME EASY GO/NEWS
4:20:38 PMHappy/Pharrell William
4:24:28 PMBIG GIRL/Selina
4:31:07 PM流星小夜曲/陳昇
4:38:36 PMJust Dance/Lady Gaga
4:46:37 PMLet Me Luv U Down/EXILE 放浪兄弟
4:50:45 PM怨偶/MC HotDog/艾怡良
4:54:16 PM現場直播/潘瑋柏
🎉7/15(一)
2:04:13 PMCake By The Ocean/DNCE
2:07:47 PM鑽石糖/蕭亞軒
2:11:52 PM520/薛凱琪
2:19:16 PM口袋裡的愛/C.T.O/羅志祥/愷樂
2:22:44 PM愛的證明/Puffy 帕妃
2:28:46 PM那一年,這一天/任賢齊/舒淇
2:32:33 PM今夜只為你歌唱/許茹芸
2:38:43 PM愛情遊戲/MOJO
2:41:57 PMBoulevard Of Broken Drea/Green Day
2:49:29 PM再見 美好時光/KARA
2:53:58 PM美人計/蔡依林
3:03:56 PM夢中的情話/江蕙/阿杜
3:08:37 PM我依然是我/王笠人
3:11:45 PMStrawberry Sex/平井堅
3:20:56 PM恰好的寂寞/順子
3:24:26 PMFLOW/方大同/王力宏
3:28:12 PMWHO DO U LOVE/Monsta X/ French Montana
3:34:40 PM尋人啟事/徐佳瑩
3:39:11 PM愛,很簡單/陶吉吉
3:43:28 PMSunny Side Up!/Red Velvet
3:50:06 PMCity of Stars/Ryan Gosling
3:53:33 PMNever The Point/小男孩樂團
4:04:03 PM大雨的夜裡/張清芳
4:07:35 PM放手去愛/吳思賢
4:11:47 PMMy Love Song/Cross Gene
4:18:18 PM喬治克隆人/糯米團
4:22:24 PMBeat it/Michael Jackson
4:30:01 PM不想讓你知道/周蕙
4:34:17 PMOde To My Family/The Cranberries
4:39:52 PMWILD/noovy
4:46:40 PM蘋果派/MAMALAID RAG
4:49:35 PM沒完沒了/李心潔
4:54:02 PM戀愛絕句選/黃雅莉
🎸7/12(五)
2:04:06 PMKung Fu Fighting/Jack Black
2:06:31 PM舞功夫/Saya
2:09:51 PM不如跳舞/陳慧琳
2:15:45 PM有一種悲傷/A-Lin
2:19:32 PMMy Life/德永英明
2:31:02 PMMirror Mirror/M2M
2:34:14 PM單細胞/江明娟
2:38:56 PM天后/陳勢安
2:47:19 PM愛情塵埃 Love Dust/BIGBANG
2:52:15 PM愛呦/陶晶瑩/夢飛船
3:04:03 PM真心換絕情/吳宗憲
3:08:56 PM愛的羅曼死/蔡依林
3:13:32 PMIn The Summertime/Shaggy
3:20:18 PM跳進來/張惠妹/葛仲珊
3:23:19 PM表白/蕭亞軒
3:26:45 PMParty Ain’t Over/Pitbull/Usher
3:35:30 PMEnd Of The Road/Boyz II Men
3:41:18 PMC大調/張韶涵
3:44:37 PMSay U Love Me/南拳媽媽Lara/
3:52:18 PM不可思議愛上你/化學猴子
3:55:40 PMFantasy/ AOA
4:03:56 PM愛情的盡頭/伍佰
4:10:08 PM樂園Paradise/Orange
4:17:13 PMLove Me Now/John Legend
4:20:41 PM現在不跳舞要幹嘛/徐佳瑩
4:24:12 PM真情人/李玟
4:33:10 PM漂亮小姐/陳奕迅
4:38:47 PMNot Fair/Lily Allen
4:45:23 PM法蘭西多士/告五人
4:49:50 PM誰撿到我的夢/林依晨
4:53:36 PMOn My Mind/Ellie Goulding
🎧7/11(四)
2:04:04 PM天氣預報/關詩敏
2:07:14 PM天蠍蝴蝶/阿杜
2:10:23 PMFight The Blues/宇多田 光
2:18:21 PM再見了,唇/Haruleo
2:22:17 PM痛也不說出口的我/楊培安
2:32:13 PMClick Flash/Ciara 席亞拉
2:36:01 PM睡過頭/溫嵐
2:39:51 PM我多麼羨慕你/張洪量
2:43:12 PMOh You Yeah You/俞勝恩
2:49:53 PM愛X無限大/元若藍
2:53:16 PMSugar/Maroon 5
3:04:03 PM花若離枝/蘇芮
3:09:54 PMStill Love You/張立昂
3:16:41 PMDon't Wake Me Up/Chris Brown
3:21:13 PM你在等什麼/汪東城
3:29:30 PM海嘯/有里知花
3:35:33 PM爸爸/李千娜
3:40:15 PM那天/藍又時
3:47:49 PMI Had A Dream/Kelly Clarkson
3:52:47 PM下雨的夜晚/蘇打綠
4:03:56 PM煙雨濛濛/江淑娜
4:08:05 PM就這麼錯過/馬仕釗
4:12:38 PMI don't need a man/Miss A
4:19:13 PM結果咧/大嘴巴
4:23:31 PM爆破前一刻的FUNK/Kick The Can Crew
4:32:33 PM淚崩了/亦帆
4:38:40 PMSan Francisco Bay Blues/The Brothers Four
4:44:29 PM憑什麼/林逸欣
4:48:26 PMHave A Nice Day/Bon Jovi
4:52:04 PM刺青春/F.I.R.飛兒樂團
💠7/10(三)
14:04:11萬人迷不迷/辰亦儒
14:07:36灌溉愛/郭采潔
14:10:53Hey Baby/No Doubt
14:17:44Old Town Road/Lil Nas X
14:20:16小小螞蟻/潘瑋柏
14:28:53Freedom/Love Psychedelico
14:35:18我是不是你最疼愛的人/符瓊音
14:39:48紙人/楊永聰
14:48:04Smack That/AKon/Eminem
14:52:42很愛很愛你/劉若英
15:03:56向前走/林強
15:09:48其實我們都忘了/王艷薇
15:13:24You Should Be Dancing/Bee Gees
15:20:05哭過就好了/梁文音
15:24:50不散的筵席/丁世光
15:34:13超快感/孫燕姿
15:37:49PUPPY/FTISLAND
15:45:53海闊天空/Beyond
15:51:53Woo Hoo/Christina Aguilera/Nicki minaj
16:04:03一生愛你千百回/梅艷芳
16:08:35再見煙火/卓義峰
16:16:27GO FOR IT/西野加奈
16:20:17飛起來/徐懷鈺
16:23:44Viva La Vida/Coldplay
16:32:49雪花/黃品源
16:38:26You See Me/The Lighters
16:45:12Can You Feel The Love To/Elton John
16:49:21還能在一起的時間/喬毓明
16:53:57Um Oh Ah Yeh/Mamamoo
🈵7/9(二)
2:04:06 PMFaded/Alan Walker
2:07:29 PMWhere Will You Go/ 孫盛希
2:11:39 PM一串心/錦繡二重唱
2:18:48 PMPicky Picky/Weki Meki
2:22:02 PM你是我的菜/周湯豪
2:30:54 PM千言萬語/彭佳慧/齊秦
2:35:10 PM原來/林俊傑
2:39:51 PM非愛不可/平井堅
2:48:17 PM愛無所畏/呂薔
2:52:57 PMDrive/The Cars
3:04:03 PM愛的摩卡/黃文星
3:07:17PM刺青春/F.I.R.飛兒樂團
3:12:34PMJump/Every Little Th
3:19:36 PMIs this all/吳建豪/Ryan
3:23:12 PMDon't You Worry Child/Beth 貝絲
3:26:36 PM宇宙的邊緣/原子邦妮
3:36:07 PM愛情多惱河/熊天平
3:40:15 PM心花開/李千娜
3:43:13 PM愛愛愛/FT ISLAND
3:49:57 PMIf I Can't Have You/Shawn Mendes
3:54:13 PM有你的快樂/王若琳
4:03:56 PM飄洋過海來看你/金智娟
4:08:22 PMYesterday/Leona Lewis
4:12:11 PM被愛妄想症/麻吉弟弟/文慧如
4:18:31 PM世界中唯一僅有的花/SMAP
4:22:59 PM小鳥探戈/拜金小姐
4:32:13 PM末班車/蕭煌奇
4:38:01 PMHard To Say Im Sorry/Chicago 芝加哥
4:45:21 PM全新的我/孔晨羽
4:49:42 PMrice Tag/Jessie J
4:53:24 PM海底/鹿含
💠7/8(一)
2:04:12 PMKiss Kiss小親親/Holly Valance
2:07:34 PM花蝴蝶/蔡依林
2:10:37 PM王見王/羅志祥/楊丞琳
2:17:54 PM凌星凝望/Theseus忒修斯
2:22:24 PM不要說話/陳奕迅
2:27:01 PMThe word Friend/Noel
2:35:52 PMMiles Away/Madonna
2:41:47 PM一萬小時/宇宙人
2:50:01 PM騷動/雷光夏
2:53:39 PMJust A Man In Love/桑田佳祐
3:03:56 PM春嬌與志明/潘越雲/陳昇
3:08:38 PM淚光閃閃/夏川里美
3:12:49 PM偷偷愛/方炯鑌
3:21:16 PM凡人/蕭秉治
3:25:44 PMBounce Back/Little Mix
3:28:23 PM乖乖牌/安心亞
3:36:25 PM愛錯/王力宏
3:40:18 PM灌飽元氣頌/關8
3:44:50 PM我爸的筆/魏如萱
3:51:01 PM球鞋蜈蚣/葛仲珊
3:53:38 PMCloser/Ne-Yo
4:04:04 PM一場遊戲一場夢/王傑
4:08:13 PM醉/黃齡
4:13:00 PMNever Give Up/李先鎬
4:18:47 PM啾咪啾咪/卓文萱
4:21:59 PMBring It All Back/S Club 7
4:30:36 PM若你碰到他/蔡健雅
4:37:11 PMVerge/Owl City
4:43:50 PM天生一對/薛凱琪
4:48:41 PMBe my girl/Spexial
4:52:13 PMReady To be A Lady/girl next door
💘7/5(五)
14:04:04有點甜/汪蘇瀧/By2
14:07:43甜蜜花園/林依晨
14:11:15櫻桃/大塚 愛
14:17:45都幾歲了/Ella 陳嘉樺
14:21:41放生/范逸臣
14:26:06On My Mind/Ellie Goulding
14:34:33I Gotta Feeling/David Guetta
14:38:22超級英雄/MP 魔幻力量
14:41:57讓我逃離平庸的生活/白安
14:49:54倫敦大橋垮下來/S.H.E
14:53:16Coffee Shop/CNBLUE
15:04:03車站/張秀卿
15:08:04句點/李玉璽
15:13:01Hit On/小柳由紀
15:20:30Change Your Ticket/One Direction
15:24:49熱戀Cocktail/李雨寰
15:34:15Portrait/Mariah Carey
15:38:09最浪漫的事/趙詠華
15:42:25 飛人/黃奕儒
15:49:17乳臭未乾/徐良/潘卉綺
15:52:13Time of our lives/Ne-Yo/Pitbull
16:03:56選擇/葉蒨文/林子祥
16:08:23放逐愛情/解偉苓
16:12:37盡情去愛的Happy Life/Hey! Say! JUMP
16:19:43哈你歌/庾澄慶/小S
16:23:42Where The Streets Have No Name/Pet Shop Boys
16:33:24許願樹/鄭中基
16:37:47Love You Like A Love Son/Selena Gomez
16:44:01慕靈/黑旋風
16:49:20How We Do Party/Rita Ora
16:53:31講不聽/張韶涵
🤞7/4(四)
14:04:20超喜歡你/飛輪海
14:07:45Everybody/Backstreet
14:12:25瘋起來/孫盛希/葛仲珊
14:18:54Evergreen/SIRUP
14:22:50小王子/張芸京
14:32:34傻瓜/蘇慧倫
14:36:18COME BACK HOME/2NE1
14:41:12愛是一本書/陳奕迅
14:47:36Girls Just Want To Have/Cyndi Lauper
14:52:34假朋友真兄弟/熊仔
15:04:03溫一壺青春下酒/流氓阿德
15:08:53Cry No More/中島美嘉
15:13:26厭世吉娃娃/MC HotDog
15:21:05獨領風騷/杜德偉
15:24:40美力女孩/楊上昀
15:28:12Green Light/Lorde
15:36:51美好/吳汶芳
15:40:57Beautiful in White/Shane Filan
15:44:41卡通人生/郭采潔
15:50:29兩個恰恰/旺福
15:54:31Come Dance With Me/Michael Buble
16:03:56靠近/庾澄慶
16:08:47好久不見/彭佳慧
16:13:16愛哭鬼之歌/風味堂
16:20:57I Got You/Bebe Rexha 比比
16:24:03甩個POSE/林育群/陳嘉唯
16:32:13當冬夜漸暖/孫燕姿
16:37:57Bang!/After School
16:44:56重來/黃小琥
16:50:06Baby, love you/李建軒
16:53:05Get Lucky/Datf Punk
🎀7/3(三)
2:04:12 PM由我們主宰/五月天/嚴爵/家家/亂彈阿翔
2:07:11 PMstaring over/JENNIFER LOPEZ
2:15:03 PMSenorita/Shawn Mendes
2:18:12 PM雙陳記/陳珊妮/陳怡文
2:27:38 PM記事本/陳慧琳
2:31:38 PM風箏/2012全國應屆畢業歌
2:38:33 PMBig Boys Cry/安室奈美惠
2:45:07 PM你的完美有點難懂並不代表/盧凱彤
2:50:42 PM我的媽/黃靖倫
2:53:37 PMTake A Picture/Carly Rae Jepsen
3:03:56 PM討債情歌/玖壹壹
3:07:29 PM大俠艾吃漢堡包/艾成
3:11:15 PMSoul To Soul/S.E.S
3:17:26 PM生活需要多一點樂觀/PiA吳蓓雅
3:22:15 PM想婚頭/大塚 愛
3:31:02 PM遠走/柯智棠
3:36:45 PM我最親愛的/張惠妹
3:41:27 PMNobody Knows/SHAYNE WARD
3:49:06 PMYou've Got A Friend In Me/Randy Newman
3:51:58 PM女孩韋禮安
4:04:03 PM為你我受冷風吹林憶蓮
4:08:11 PM不完美李玖哲
4:11:42 PMRBBRed Velvet
4:17:51 PMAlwaysBon Jovi
4:23:28 PMDancing! Dancing!睡帽樂團
4:31:40 PM最好的我龔芝怡/房祖名
4:37:55 PMHow Do You Do!/ Roxette
4:44:41 PMBeliever/Imagine Dragons
4:48:01 PM最後只好躺下來/黃立行
4:52:42 PM有種愛 Just Love It/紅花樂團
☔7/2(二)
14:04:04情花開/張棟樑
14:06:34MUSIC featBOY-KEN/清水翔太
14:10:54天旋地轉/梁一貞
14:18:56Time with yo/圭賢
14:22:33愛回溫/溫嵐
14:32:32Candy 蜜糖/Robbie Williams
14:36:57時光慢些走/方季惟
14:42:17愛就是咖哩/嚴爵
14:49:12厭世吉娃娃/MC HotDog
14:53:56Been You/Justin Bieber
15:04:03毋通/曾瑋中
15:07:29I Need Your Love/Calvin Harris
15:11:18My Girl/敖犬
15:18:04Best Friend/西野加奈
15:23:17愛你/柯有倫
15:26:48我不美/NEON樂團
15:34:59流浪者之歌/陳綺貞
15:39:38祝福/張學友
15:44:03 What A Girl Wants/Christina Aguilria
15:50:09為你瘋狂/T-ARA
15:53:20Don't Stop The Music/Dream Girls
16:03:56寬容/張信哲
16:09:03一戀愛就亂了/林凡
16:13:55戀人是酒紅色/Aska
16:21:27愛不需要裝乖/謝和弦/王詩安
16:25:14Mama/Jonas Blue
16:33:31曾經太年輕/藍又時
16:37:53茱麗葉/standing egg
16:41:59山上拉釘人/BOXING
16:49:27Everything Happens For A/杭士琁
16:53:30Nothing really matters/David Guetta
🎼7/1(一)
2:04:11 PM萬眾矚目/許慧欣
2:07:21 PMBreak Free/Ariana Grande
2:13:41 PM一樣不一樣/Supper Moment
2:18:19 PM媽媽說/周渝民
2:26:29 PM背叛/楊宗緯
2:31:42 PMEverything/Che'Nelle
2:38:55 PM嘿 Morrison/leo王/李英宏
2:42:20 PMWorth It/Fifth Harmony
2:48:56 PM幸福不是情歌/劉若英
2:53:13 PM我愛你I Love You/金範秀
3:03:56 PM情字這條路/鳳飛飛
3:07:18 PM當愛情來了/王心凌
3:11:04 PMSwing/U-KNOW允浩/BoA
3:18:40 PM空城/王菲
3:23:11 PM耳朵/李榮浩
3:26:59 PMYou Got Me/Colbie Caillat
3:35:59 PM你愛我嗎/櫻桃幫
3:40:35 PM快樂鳥日子/康晉榮
3:47:32 PM糖果/藍心湄
3:52:52 PM現在開始Wonderland/AKB48
4:04:03 PM愛與愁/伍思凱
4:08:42 PM以後以後/林芯儀
4:12:28 PMDark Side/Kelly Clarkson
4:18:38 PM歹性底/頑童MJ116
4:21:50 PM我不是壞女孩/高以愛
4:30:00 PM擁抱我/光良
4:34:11 PM只有回憶太難過/柴崎幸
4:40:53 PMWings 翅膀/OZI
4:43:17 PMStill Alive/BIGBANG
4:49:41 PMLovely Pie/紀佳松
4:53:53 PMNobody Compares/One Direction
#歌單
#好事自在Latte
#好事989
#DJ荳子
broken down意思 在 葉漢浩 Alex Ip Facebook 的最讚貼文
戴耀廷的結案陳詞
公民抗命的精神
首先,這是一宗公民抗命的案子。
我站在這裏,就是為了公民抗命。陳健民教授、朱耀明牧師與我一起發起的「讓愛與和平佔領中環運動」,是一場公民抗命的運動。在以前,少有香港人聽過公民抗命,但現在公民抗命這意念在香港已是家傳戶曉。
終審法院在律政司對黃之鋒案Secretary for Justice v Wong Chi Fung (2018) 21 HKCFAR 35採納了約翰羅爾斯在《正義論》中為公民抗命所下的定義。公民抗命是「一項公開、非暴力、真誠的政治行為,通常是爲了導致法律上或社會上的改變,所作出的違法行爲。」
在律政司對黃之鋒案,賀輔明勳爵是終審法院的非常任法官。在此案,終審法院引述了賀輔明勳爵在R v Jones (Margaret) [2007] 1 AC 136的說法:「出於真誠理由的公民抗命在這國家有源遠流長及光榮的歷史。」終審法院認同公民抗命的概念是同樣適用於其他尊重個人權利的法制如香港。但為何公民抗命是光榮和文明呢?終審法院沒有進一步解釋。
約翰羅爾斯的定義大體只能說出公民抗命的行為部分。 在馬丁路德金博士非常有名關於公民抗命的著作《從伯明罕市監獄發出的信》中,他道出更多公民抗命的意圖部分或公民抗命的精神。這信函是他在 1963年4 月16日,因在亞拉巴馬州伯明罕市參與示威爭取民權後被判入獄時寫的。
在信函中他說:「一個人若不遵守不公義的法律,必須要公開,充滿愛心和願意接受懲罰。個人因為其良心指出某法律是不公義的,而且甘心接受懲處,是要喚起社會的良知,關注到那中間的不公義,這樣其實是對法律表達了最大的敬意。」
馬丁路德金博士認為有時法律在表面上是公義的,但實行時卻變得不公義。他說:「我未得准許而遊行,並因而被捕,現在的確有一條法例,要求遊行須得准許,但這條法例如果是用了來…否定公民運用和平集會和抗議的權利,則會變成不公義。」
他還說:「 面對一個經常拒絕談判的社區,非暴力的直接行動正是為了營造一次危機,以及加強一種具創造力的張力,逼使對方面對問題,也使問題戲劇地呈現出來,讓其不能再被忽略。」
馬丁路德金博士對我啟發良多,我們也把這精神栽種在「讓愛與和平佔領中環運動」中。緊隨馬丁路德金博士在公民抗命之路的腳步,我們努力去開啟人心中那份自我犧牲的愛及平靜安穩,而非煽惑憤怒與仇恨。
終審法院在律政司對黃之鋒案進一步引述賀輔明勳爵在R v Jones (Margaret) 的說法:「違法者與執法者都有一些規則要遵守。示威者的行為要合乎比例,並不會導致過量的破壞或不便。以証明他們的真誠信念,他們應接受法律的懲處。」
雖然終審法院在律政司對黃之鋒案沒有引述這部分,賀輔明勳爵在R v Jones (Margaret) 還說:「另一方面,警察與檢控官的行為也要有所節制,並法官在判刑時應考慮示威者的真誠動機。」這些有關公民抗命的規則應也適用,終審法院應不會反對。
公民抗命的目的並不是要妨擾公眾,而是要喚起公眾關注社會的不公義,並贏取人們認同社會運動的目標。若一個人被確立了是在進行公民抗命,那他就不可能會意圖造成不合理的阻礙,因那是與公民抗命背道而馳,即使最後因他的行動造成的阻礙是超出了他所能預見的。
非暴力是「讓愛與和平佔領中環運動」的指導原則。公民抗命的行為,就是佔領中環,是運動的最後一步。進行公民抗命時,示威者會坐在馬路上,手扣手,等候警察拘捕,不作反抗。我們計劃及希望達到的佔領程度是合乎比例的。我們相信所會造成的阻礙是合理的。
我相信我們已做了公民抗命中違法者所當做的,我們期望其他人也會做得到他們所當做的。
追求民主
在一宗公民抗命的案件,公民抗命的方法是否合乎比例,不能抽空地談,必須考慮進行那行動的目的。
這是一宗關乎一群深愛香港的香港人的案件,他們相信只有透過引入真普選,才能開啟化解香港深層次矛盾之門。
我就是他們其中一人。與那些一起追尋同一民主夢的人,為了我們的憲法權利,我們已等了超過三十年。當我還在大學讀法律時,我已參與香港的民主運動。現在,我的兒子也剛大學畢業了,香港還未有民主。
馬丁路德金博士在信函中還說:「壓迫者從不自願施予自由,自由是被壓迫者爭取得來的。…如同我們出色的法學家所說,延誤公義,就是否定公義。」我們在追求公義,但對當權者來說,我們計劃的行動誠然是妨擾。
《基本法》第45 條規定行政長官的產生辦法最終達至由一個有廣泛代表性的提名委員會按民主程序提名後普選產生的目標。《公民及政治權利國際公約》第 25 條規定:「凡屬公民,無分第二條所列之任何區別,不受無理限制,均應有權利及機會:…(乙)在真正、定期之選舉中投票及被選。選舉權必須普及而平等,選舉應以無記名投票法行之,以保證選民意志之自由表現 …」
聯合國人權委員會在《第25號一般性意見》,為《公民及政治權利國際公約》第 25 (乙) 條中的 「普及而平等」,提供了它的理解和要求。第15段說:「有效落實競選擔任經選舉產生的職位的權利和機會有助於確保享有投票權的人自由挑選候選人。」第17段說:「不得以政治見解為由剝奪任何人參加競選的權利。」
全國人民代表大會常務委員會在2004年就《基本法》附件一及附件二作出的解釋,實質改變了修改行政長官選舉辦法的憲法程序。在行政長官向立法會提出修改產生辦法的法案前,額外加了兩步。行政長官就是否需要進行修改,須向全國人民代表大會常務委員會提出報告。全國人民代表大會常務委員會根據香港特別行政區的實際情況和循序漸進的原則作出確定。相關法案須經立法會全體議員三分之二多數 通過,行政長官同意,並報全國人民代表大會常務委員會批准或者備案。
在2014年8月31日,全國人民代表大會常務委員會完成了憲法修改程序的第二步,作出了有關行政長官產生辦法的決定。全國人民代表大會常務委員會除決定行政長官可由普選產生外,就普選行政長官的產生辦法設下了具體及嚴厲的規定。
提名委員會的人數、構成和委員產生辦法都得按照第四任行政長官選舉委員會的人數、構成和委員產生辦法而規定。提名委員會按民主程序只可提名產生二至三名行政長官候選人。每名候選人均須獲得提名委員會全體委員半數以上的支持。
按著全國人民代表大會常務委員會自行設定的程序,全國人民代表大會常務委員會應只有權決定是否批准或不批准行政長官提交的報告,而不能就提名委員會的組成及提名程序,設下詳細的規定。全國人民代表大會常務委員會連自己設定的程序也沒有遵守。
若按著全國人民代表大會常務委員會設下的嚴厲條件去選舉產生行政長官,香港的選民就候選人不會有真正的選擇,因所有不受歡迎的人都會被篩選掉。這與普選的意思是不相符的。
這些香港人進行公民抗命,是要喚起香港社會及世界的關注,中國政府不公義地違背了憲法的承諾,也破壞了它的憲法責任。我們所作的,是為了維護我們及所有香港人的憲法權利,包括了反對我們的行動的人;是為了要我們的主權國履行承諾;是為了爭取香港憲制進行根本改革;及為香港的未來帶來更多公義。
和平示威的權利
這案件是關乎和平示威自由及言論自由的權利。
根據「讓愛與和平佔領中環運動」的原先計劃,舉行公眾集會的地方是遮打道行人專用區、遮打花園及皇后像廣場,時間是由2014年 10月1 日下午三時正開始,最長也不會超過2014年 10月5 日。我們期望會有三類人來到。
第一類人已決定了會參與公民抗命。他們會在過了合法的時限後,繼續坐在遮打道上。他們是那些在「讓愛與和平佔領中環運動」意向書上選了第二或第三個選項的人。第二類人決定不會參與公民抗命,而只是來支援第一類人。過了合法的時限後,他們會離開遮打道,去到遮打花園或皇后像廣場。他們是那些在「讓愛與和平佔領中環運動」意向書上選了第一個選項的人。第三類人還未決定是否參與公民抗命的行動。他們可以到合法時限快要過去的最後一刻,才決定是否留在遮打道上。
我們相信警方會有足夠時間把所有參與佔領中環公民抗命的示威者移走。估計會有數千人參與。我們要求參與者要嚴守非暴力的紀律。我們採用了詳細的方法去確保大部分即使不是所有參與者都會跟從。
我們是在行使受《基本法》第27 條保障的和平示威自由的憲法權利。這也與同受《基本法》第27 條保障的言論自由有緊密關係。透過《基本法》第39條,言論自由、表達自由、和平集會的自由受《香港人權法》第16 及17條的憲法保障,而這些條文與《公民及政治權利國際公約》第19 及21是一樣的,是《公民及政治權利國際公約》適用於香港的部分。
若原訂計劃真的執行,那可能會觸犯《公安條例》一些關於組織未經批准集結的規定,但我們相信那會舉行的公眾集會是不會對公眾構成不合理的阻礙的。會被佔領的空間,包括了馬路,是公眾在公眾假期可自由使用的。計劃佔領的時期,首兩天是公眾假期,最後兩天是周末。
當公眾集會的地方轉到政府總部外的添美路、立法會道及龍匯道的行人路及馬路的範圍(下稱「示威區域」),雖然集會的主題、領導、組織及參加者的組成已改變了,但精神卻沒有。在2014年9 月27 和 28日,人們是被邀請來示威區域參加集會的。這仍然是公民在行使和平示威自由及言論自由的權利。
相類似的公眾集會也曾在2012年9 月3至 8日,在反國民教育運動中在示威區域內舉行。除卻公民在那時候還可以進入公民廣場(政府總部東翼前地),在2012年9月在反國民教育運動的佔領空間,與示威者在2014年9 月27 和 28日在警方封鎖所有通往示威區域通道前所佔領的空間是很相近的。
自2012年的反國民教育運動後,這示威區域已被普遍認同,是可以用來組織有大量公眾參與,反對香港特別行政區政府的大型公眾集會的公共空間。換句話說,公眾都認知示威區域是一個重要場地,讓香港公民聚集去一起行使和平示威自由的權利。
根據此我們也抱有的公眾認知,當我在2014年9 月28日凌晨宣布提前佔領中環的時候,我們只可能意圖叫人來到示威區域而不會是任何其他地方。要佔領示威區域以外的地方,沒可能是當時我們所能想到的。沒有人會如此想的。
在梁國雄對香港特別行政區案Leung Kwok-hung v. HKSAR (2005) 8 HKCFAR 229, 終審法院指出: 「和平集會權利涉及一項政府(即行政當局)所須承擔的積極責任,那就是採取合理和適當的措施,使合法的集會能夠和平地進行。然而,這並非一項絕對責任,因為政府不能保證合法的集會定會和平地進行,而政府在選擇採取何等措施方面享有廣泛的酌情權。至於甚麼是合理和適當的措施,則須視乎個別個案中的所有情況而定。」
如控方証人黃基偉高級警司 (PW2) 在作供時所說,當有太多的示威者聚集在鄰接的行人路,警方為了示威者的安全,就會封鎖示威區域內的馬路。能有一個公共空間讓反對政府的人士和平集會以宣洩他們對香港特別行政區政府的不滿,對香港社會來說,那是一項公共利益。即使在示威區域長期舉行集會是違反《公安條例》,但這不會對公眾構成共同傷害。受影響的部分公眾只是很少,而造成的不便相對來說也是輕微。
終審法院常任法官包致金在楊美雲對香港特別行政區案Yeung May-wan v. HKSAR (2005) 8 HKCFAR 137中說:「《基本法》第二十七條下的保障,不會純粹因為集會、遊行或示威對公路上的自由通行造成某種干擾而被撤回。本席認為,除非所造成的干擾屬不合理,即超出可合理地預期公眾可容忍的程度,否則集會、遊行或示威不會失去這項保障。關於這一點,本席認為,大型甚或大規模集會、遊行或示威的參加者往往有理由指出,只有如此大規模的活動才能協助有效地表達他們的意見。除此之外,本席認為最明顯的相關考慮因素是干擾的嚴重程度和干擾為時多久。不過,也可能有其他的相關考慮因素,本席認為包括以下一項:在有關的干擾發生之前,是否有人曾一度或數度作出一項或多項干擾行為?可合理地預期公眾能容許甚麼,乃屬事實和程度的問題,但在回答這個問題時,法庭務須謹記,毫無保留地保存相關自由,正是合理性的定義,而非僅是用作決定是否合理的因素之一。」
參與示威區域的公眾集會的示威者並不能構成阻礙,因示威區域的馬路是由警方封鎖的。警方封鎖示威區域的馬路是為了保障示威者的安全 ,讓他們可以安全地及和平地行使和平集會的權利。就算在示威區域是造成了一定程度的阻礙,考慮到示威者是在行使他們的和平示威自由的憲法權利,那阻礙也不能是不合理的。
即使當示威者在2014年9 月28日走到分域碼頭街及夏慤道,人們只是被邀請來到示威區域而不是留在那些道路上。警方被要求開放通向示威區域的通路,好讓人們能去到示威區域與示威者們一起。若非通往示威區域的通路被警方封鎖了,大部份人即使不是所有人,應都會進入示威區域,而那些道路就不會被佔領。催淚彈也就沒有需要發放。
警方應有責任去促使公民能在示威區域舉行公眾集會,但警方卻把示威區域封鎖了,阻礙人們來到示威區域參與公眾集會。示威區域內的示威者不可能意圖或造成任何在示威區域以外所出現的阻礙,因他們只是邀請人們來到示威區域與他們一起。
當警方見到已有大量人群在示威區域外意圖進入示威區域,警方仍不負責任地拒絕開放通向示威區域的通路。警方必須為示威區域外所造成的阻礙及之後發生的所有事負上責任。
在警方發放87催淚彈及使用過度武力後,一切都改變了。如此發放催淚彈是沒有人能預見的,事情再不是我們所能掌控。到了那時候,我們覺得最重要的事,就是帶領參加運動的人平安回家。
在發放催淚彈後的無數個日與夜,我們竭力用不同方法去盡快結束佔領。我們幫助促使學生領袖與政府主要官員對話。我們與各方商討能否接受以變相公投為退場機制。我們籌組了廣場投票。即使我們這些工作的大部分最後都沒有成效,但我們真的是盡了力及用盡能想到的方法去達到這目標。最後,我們在2014年12 月3日向警方自首。金鐘範圍的佔領在2014年12 月11日也結束了。
不恰當檢控
這是關乎不恰當地以公眾妨擾罪作為罪名起訴的案件。
如賀輔明勳爵in R v Jones (Margaret) 所指出,檢控官也有公民抗命的規則要遵守的,他們的行為要有所節制。
在 “Public Nuisance – A Critical Examination,” Cambridge Law Journal 48(1), March 1989, pp. 55-84, 一文,J. R. Spencer 看到:「近年差不多所有以公眾妨擾罪來起訴的案件,都出現以下兩種情況的其中一個: 一、當被告人的行為是觸犯了成文法律,通常懲罰是輕微的,檢控官想要以一支更大或額外的棒子去打他; 二、當被告人的行為看來是明顯完全不涉及刑事責任的,檢控官找不到其他罪名可控訴他。」兵咸勳爵在 R v Rimmington [2006] 1 AC 469 採納了J. R. Spencer 對檢控官在控訴公眾妨擾罪時暗藏的動機的批評。
若有一適當的成文罪行能涵蓋一宗公民抗命案件中的違法行為,我們可以合理地質問為何要以公眾妨擾罪來起訴?即使這不構成濫用程序,但這案件的檢控官一定已違反了賀輔明勳爵在 R v Jones (Margaret) 所指出適用於他的公民抗命的規則,因他並沒有節制行為。
這是關乎不恰當地以串謀及煽惑人煽惑為罪名起訴的案件。
同樣地,在一宗公民抗命的案件及一宗涉及和平示威自由的權利的案件,以串謀及煽惑人煽惑為罪名起訴,那是過度的。在串謀的控罪,控方提出的証據是我們的公開發言。按定義,公民抗命一定是一項公開的行為。若這些公開發言可以用於檢控,那會把所有的公民抗命都扼殺於萌芽階段。那麼說公民抗命是一些光榮之事就變得毫無意義,因公民抗命根本就不可能出現。更惡劣的後果是,社會出現寒蟬效應,很多合理的言論都會被噤聲。對言論自由的限制必然是不合乎比例。
在香港普通法是否有煽惑人煽惑這罪名仍存爭議,但即使真有這罪行,在一宗公民抗命的案件及一宗涉及和平示威自由的權利的案件,以串謀及煽惑人煽惑為罪名起訴,那是過度地、不合理地及不必要地擴展過失責任。
因主罪行是那惹人猜疑的公眾妨擾罪,以煽惑人煽惑去構成公眾妨擾罪來起訴,那更會把過失責任擴展至明顯不合理的程度。若檢控官的行為不是那麼過度和不合理,起訴的罪名是恰當的,我們是不會抗辯的。無論如何,當控罪相信是過度及不合理,我們提出抗辯不應被視為拒絕接受法律的懲處,違反了違法者的公民抗命規則。
有些問題是我這位置難以解答的。若檢控官違反了賀輔明勳爵在 R v Jones (Margaret) 所指出的公民抗命的規則,那會有甚麼後果呢?由誰來糾正這錯誤呢?
守護法治
歸根究底,這是一宗關乎香港法治與高度自治的案件。
作為香港法治及憲法的學者,我相信單純依靠司法獨立是不足以維護香港的法治。 缺乏一個真正的民主制度,政府權力會被濫用,公民的基利不會得到充分的保障。沒有民主,要抵抗越來越厲害對「一國兩制」下香港的高度自由的侵害,會是困難的。在「雨傘運動」後,還有很長的路才能到達香港民主之旅的終點。
終審法院常任法官鄧國楨在退休前法庭儀式上致辭說:「雖然法官決意維護法治,讓其在香港的價值及運用恒久不變,但關鍵在於社會對法官予以由衷的支持。那應是何等形式的支持?我認為,應是全面而徹底的支持。如果法官受到不公的抨擊,請緊守立場並支持他們。可是,不要只因爲某些事件才對他們表示支持。那並不足夠,也可能已經太遲。大家應致力在社會上培養有利於法治的氛圍。我們在香港擁有新聞自由及選舉自由,必須努力發聲,讓你的選票發揮作用。請相信我,自由的代價是要時刻保持警覺。更重要的是,永遠不要放棄或低估自己的力量。如果我們整體社會堅持維護法治,無人可以輕易把它奪走。千萬不要讓此事變得輕而易舉。」
我們都有責任去守護香港的法治和高度自治。我在這裹,是因我用了生命中很多的年月,直至此時此刻,去守護香港的法治,那亦是香港的高度自治不可或缺的部份。我永不會放棄,也必會繼續爭取香港的民主。
我相信法治能為公民抗命提供理據。公民抗命與法治有共同的目標,就是追求公義。公民抗命是有效的方法去確保這共同目標能達成,至少從長遠來說,公民抗命能創造一個氛圍,讓其他方法可被用來達成那目標。
若我們真是有罪,那麼我們的罪名就是在香港這艱難的時刻仍敢於去散播希望。入獄,我不懼怕,也不羞愧。若這苦杯是不能挪開,我會無悔地飲下。
DCCC 480/2017
Closing Submission of Tai Yiu-ting (D1)
1. First, this is a case of civil disobedience.
2. Here, I am standing up for civil disobedience.
3. The Occupy Central with Love and Peace Movement, initiated by Professor Chan Kin-man, Reverend Chu Yiu-ming and I, was a movement of civil disobedience.
4. Civil disobedience, known little by Hong Kong people in the past, is now a household idea in Hong Kong.
5. The Court of Final Appeal in Secretary for Justice v Wong Chi Fung (2018) 21 HKCFAR 35 at paragraph 70 endorsed the definition of civil disobedience put forward by John Rawls in A Theory of Justice (Revised Edition, 1999) at p. 320.
6. Civil disobedience is “a public, nonviolent, conscientious yet political act contrary to law usually done with the aim of bringing about a change in the law or policies of the government.”
7. In Secretary for Justice v Wong Chi Fung, the Court of Final Appeal with Lord Hoffmann as the non-permanent judge repeated at paragraph 72 what Lord Hoffmann had said in R v Jones (Margaret) [2007] 1 AC 136 at paragraph 89, “civil disobedience on conscientious grounds has a long and honourable history in this country.” The Court of Final Appeal accepted that the concept of civil disobedience is equally recognisable in a jurisdiction respecting individual rights, like Hong Kong.
8. However, it was not explained why civil disobedience is honourable and civilised.
9. John Rawls’ definition spells out more the actus reus of civil disobedience.
10. In his very famous work on civil disobedience, Letter from a Birmingham Jail reproduced in The Journal of Negro History, Vol. 71, No. 1/4 (Winter - Autumn, 1986), pp. 38-44, Dr Martin Luther King Jr. provided more the mens rea of civil disobedience or the spirit of civil disobedience. The Letter was written by him on 16 April 1963 while in jail serving a sentence for participating in civil rights demonstration in Birmingham, Alabama.
11. He said (p. 41), “One who breaks an unjust law must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty. I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and willingly accepts the penalty by staying in jail to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the very highest respect for law.”
12. To Dr King, a law could be just on its face but unjust in its application. He said in the Letter (p. 40-41), “I was arrested…on a charge of parading without a permit. Now there is nothing wrong with an ordinance which requires a permit for a parade, but when the ordinance is used to …deny citizens the First Amendment privilege of peaceful assembly and peaceful protest, then it becomes unjust.”
13. He also said (p. 39), “Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and establish such creative tension that a community that has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue. It seeks so to dramatise the issue that it can no longer be ignored.”
14. I was inspired very much by Dr King, and this is the same spirit we have implanted in the Occupy Central with Love and Peace Movement. Following Dr King’s steps closely in the path of civil disobedience, we strive to inspire self-sacrificing love and peacefulness but not to incite anger and hatred.
15. The Court of Final Appeal in Secretary for Justice v Wong Chi Fung further cited what Lord Hoffmann had said in R v Jones (Margaret), “[T]here are conventions which are generally accepted by the law-breakers on one side and the law-enforcers on the other. The protesters behave with a sense of proportion and do not cause excessive damage or inconvenience. And they vouch the sincerity of their beliefs by accepting the penalties imposed by the law.”
16. Though the Court of Final Appeal did not quote this part of the judgment in Secretary for Justice v Wong Chi Fung, Lord Hoffmann in R v Jones (Margaret) also said, “The police and prosecutors, on the other hand, behave with restraint and the magistrates impose sentences which take the conscientious motives of the protesters into account.” These other conventions of civil disobedience should also apply, and it is not likely that the Court of Final Appeal would object.
17. The purpose of civil disobedience is not to obstruct the public but to arouse public concern to the injustice in society and to win sympathy from the public on the cause of the social movement.
18. If it is found that a person is committing an act of civil disobedience, he could not have intended to cause unreasonable obstruction as it will defeat the whole purpose of civil disobedience itself even if his action might at the end have caused a degree of obstruction more than he could have known.
19. Non-violence was the overarching principle of the Occupy Central with Love and Peace Movement. The act of civil disobedience, i.e. occupy Central, was the last resort of the movement. The manner of civil disobedience by the protesters was to sit down together on the street with arms locked and wait to be arrested by the police without struggling. The scale of occupation was planned and intended to be proportionate. We believe that the obstruction must be reasonable.
20. I believe we have done our part as the law-breaker in civil disobedience. We expect the others will do their parts.
21. In a case of civil disobedience, whether the means of civil disobedience is proportionate; contextually, the end must be considered.
22. This is a case about some Hong Kong people who love Hong Kong very much and believe that only through the introduction of genuine universal suffrage could a door be opened to resolving the deep-seated conflicts in Hong Kong.
23. I am one of those Hong Kong people. With all people who share the same democratic dream, we have waited for more than thirty years for our constitutional rights. Since the time I was a law student at the University, I had been involved in Hong Kong’s Democratic Movement. Now, my son has just graduated from the University, democracy is still nowhere in Hong Kong.
24. Also said by Dr King in the Letter (p. 292), “…freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed…We must come to see with the distinguished jurist of yesterday that ‘justice too long delayed is justice denied.’”
25. In seeking for justice, our planned action in the eyes of the powerholders may indeed be a nuisance.
26. According to Article 45 of the Basic Law the ultimate aim of the selection of the Chief Executive (“CE”) is by universal suffrage upon nomination by a broadly representative nominating committee in accordance with democratic procedures.
27. Article 25 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (“ICCPR”) provides that, “Every citizen shall have the right and the opportunity, without any of the distinctions mentioned in article 2 and without unreasonable restrictions: … (b) To vote and to be elected at genuine periodic elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret ballot, guaranteeing the free expression of the will of the electors…”
28. The United Nations Human Rights Committee gave its understanding and requirements of universal and equal suffrage under Article 25 of the ICCPR in its General Comment No. 25 adopted on 12 July 1996. (CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.7).
29. Paragraph 15 provides that, “The effective implementation of the right and the opportunity to stand for elective office ensures that persons entitled to vote have a free choice of candidates.”
30. Paragraph 17 provides that, “political opinion may not be used as a ground to deprive any person of the right to stand for election.”
31. Through its Interpretation of Annex I and Annex II of the Basic Law in 2004, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (“NPCSC”) in effect changed the constitutional procedures to amend the election methods of the CE.
32. Before the CE can put forward bills on the amendments to the election methods to the Legislative Council (“LegCo”), two more steps are added. The CE is required to make a report to the NPCSC as regards whether there is a need to make an amendment and the NPCSC must make a determination in the light of the actual situation in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (“HKSAR”) and in accordance with the principle of gradual and orderly progress. Such bills need to have the endorsement of a two-thirds majority of all the members of the LegCo and the consent of the CE, and they shall be reported to the NPCSC.
33. On 31 August 2014, the NPCSC completed the second step of the constitutional reform process by issuing a decision on the election method of the CE. The NPCSC laid down specific and stringent requirements on the election method of the CE by universal suffrage in addition to the determination that starting from 2017 the selection of the CE may be implemented by the method of universal suffrage.
34. The number of members, composition and formation of the Nomination Committee (“NC”) have to be made in accordance with the number of members, composition and formation method of the Election Committee for the 4th CE. The NC can only nominate two to three candidates for the office of CE in accordance with democratic procedures. Each candidate must have the endorsement of more than half of all the members of the nominating committee.
35. In accordance with the procedure added by itself, the NPCSC should only have the power to make a determination of approving or not approving the CE’s report but not providing detailed requirements on the composition and nomination procedures of the NC. The NPCSC has failed to follow the procedures set by itself.
36. If the requirements set by the NPCSC on the election method of the CE were to be followed, electors in Hong Kong would not have a genuine choice of candidates in the election as all unwelcome candidates would be screened out. This is not compatible with the meaning of universal suffrage.
37. These Hong Kong people resorted to civil disobedience to arouse more concern in the community and the world that the Chinese Government had unjustly broken its constitutional promise and breached its constitutional obligation.
38. We did all we had done to protect our constitutional rights and the constitutional rights of all Hong Kong people including those who disagreed with our action, to demand a constitutional promise to be honored by our sovereign, to strive for a fundamental reform in the constitutional system of Hong Kong, and to bring more justice to the future of Hong Kong.
39. This is also a case of the right to freedom of peaceful demonstration and the right to freedom of speech.
40. According to the original plan of the Occupy Central with Love and Peace Movement, the public meeting to be organised was to be held at the Chater Road Pedestrian Precinct, the Chater Garden, and the Statue Square, from 3:00 pm on 1 October 2014 to the latest on 5 October 2014.
41. We expected that there would be three groups of people coming. The first group of people decided to commit the act of civil disobedience. They would continue to sit on the Chater Road after the notified time expired. They would be the people who had chosen the second or the third option in the letter of intent of the Occupy Central with Love and Peace Movement.
42. The second group of people decided not to commit the act of civil disobedience but just came to support the first group of people. They would leave the Chater Road after the notified time expired and move to the Chater Garden or the Statue Square. They would be the people who had chosen the first option in the letter of intent of the Occupy Central with Love and Peace Movement.
43. The third group of people might not have made up their mind yet on whether they would join the action of civil disobedience. They could decide at the very last moment when the notified time expired by choosing where to stay.
44. We believed that the police would have sufficient time to remove all the protesters joining the act of civil disobedience of occupy Central; estimated to be a few thousands.
45. We asked all participants to observe the discipline of non-violence strictly. We adopted specific measures to ensure most if not all participants would follow.
46. We were exercising our constitutional right to the freedom of peaceful demonstration protected by Article 27 of the Basic Law. It is also closely associated with the right to freedom of speech also protected by Article 27 of the Basic Law. By Article 39 of the Basic Law, constitutional protection is also given to freedom of opinion, of expression and of peaceful assembly as provided for in Articles 16 and 17 of the Hong Kong Bill of Rights, those articles being the equivalents of Articles 19 and 21 of the ICCPR and representing part of the ICCPR as applied to Hong Kong.
47. If the original plan were to be carried out, it might breach some requirements under the Public Order Ordinance concerning the organisation of unauthorised assembly. However, we believed that the public meeting to be held would not cause unreasonable obstruction to the public.
48. The space to be occupied, including the carriageway, can be freely used by every citizen on public holidays.
49. The first two days of the planned occupation were public holidays and the last two days were the weekend.
50. When the venue of the public meeting was moved to the area outside the Central Government Offices including the pavements and carriageways at Tim Mei Avenue, Legislative Council Road and Lung Hui Road (“the Demonstration Area”), though the public meeting’s themes, leadership, organization and composition of participants had changed, the spirit had not.
51. People were asked to join the public meeting in the Demonstration Area on 27 and 28 September 2014. It was still an exercise of their constitutional right to freedom of peaceful demonstration and freedom of speech by Hong Kong citizens.
52. Similar public meetings had been held in the Demonstration Area during the Anti-national Curriculum Campaign from 3-9 September 2012. Citizens at that time could have access to the Civic Square, i.e. the East Wing Forecourt of the Central Government Offices. Other than that, the space being occupied by protesters during the Anti-national Curriculum Campaign in September 2012 was very similar to the space that was being occupied by protesters on 27 and 28 September 2014 before the police cordoned all access to the Demonstration Area.
53. Since the Anti-national Curriculum Campaign in 2012, the Demonstration Area has been generally recognised to be the public space that can be used for organising big public meetings with a large number of people participating to protest against the Government of the HKSAR. In another word, the Demonstration Area is known to the public to be an important venue for citizens of Hong Kong to gather and to exercise their right to peaceful demonstration together.
54. On the basis of this public knowledge that we share, at the time when I announced the early beginning of the Occupy Central in the small hours on 28 September 2014, we could only be intending to ask people to come to the Demonstration Area but no other place. Occupying places outside the Demonstration Area could not have been in the thought of us at that time. No one could have intended that.
55. The Court of Final Appeal in Leung Kwok-hung v. HKSAR (2005) 8 HKCFAR 229 at paragraph 22 pointed out that, “…the right of peaceful assembly involves a positive duty on the part of the Government, that is the executive authorities, to take reasonable and appropriate measures to enable lawful assemblies to take place peacefully.”
56. As senior superintendent Wong Key-wai (PW2) said in his evidence, the police closed the carriageways in the Demonstration Area for the safety of the protesters when there were too many protesters on the adjacent pavements.
57. Having a public space for the public opposing the Government of the HKSAR to gather and vent their dissatisfaction against the Government peacefully is a public benefit to the society of Hong Kong. No common injury to the public can be caused even if a public meeting is being held in the Demonstration Area in contravention with the Public Order Ordinance for a prolonged period. The section of the public that will be affected is very small and the inconvenience caused is comparatively insignificant.
58. Mr Justice Bokhary PJ said in Yeung May-wan v. HKSAR (2005) 8 HKCFAR 137 at paragraph 144, “The mere fact that an assembly, a procession or a demonstration causes some interference with free passage along a highway does not take away its protection under art. 27 of the Basic Law. In my view, it would not lose such protection unless the interference caused is unreasonable in the sense of exceeding what the public can reasonably be expected to tolerate. As to that, I think that the participants in a large or even massive assembly, procession or demonstration will often be able to say with justification that their point could not be nearly as effectively made by anything on a smaller scale. Subject to this, the most obviously relevant considerations are, I think, how substantial the interference is and how long it lasts. But other considerations can be relevant, too. These include, I think, whether the interference concerned had been recently preceded by another act or other acts of interference on another occasion or other occasions. What the public can reasonably be expected to tolerate is a question of fact and degree. But when answering this question, a court must always remember that preservation of the freedom in full measure defines reasonableness and is not merely a factor in deciding what is reasonable.”
59. No obstruction can be caused by the protesters participating in a public meeting in the Demonstration Area as all carriageways in the Demonstration Area were closed by the police. The police closed the carriageways in the Demonstration Area to ensure the protesters there can exercise their right to freedom of peaceful assembly safely and peacefully. Even if there were to be some degree of obstruction in the Demonstration Area, the obstruction could not be unreasonable in light of the constitutional right to freedom of peaceful demonstration of the protesters.
60. Even after protesters walked into the carriageways of Fenwick Pier Street and Harcourt Road on 28 September 2014, people were continuing to be asked to come to the Demonstration Area but not to stay on those roads. The police were demanded to reopen the access to the Demonstration Area so that people could come and join the protesters in the Demonstration Area. If the access to the Demonstration Area were not blocked by the police, most if not all of the people out there would have entered the Demonstration Area and those roads would not have been occupied. No tear gas would need to be fired.
61. It should be the duty of the police to facilitate the holding of a public meeting in the Demonstration Area by citizens. However, the police had cordoned the Demonstration Area and prevented people from joining the public meeting in the Demonstration Area. Any obstruction outside the Demonstration Area could not be intended or caused by the protesters gathering in the Demonstration Area who were just inviting other people to join them in the Demonstration Area.
62. The police irresponsibly refused to reopen the access to the Demonstration Area even after the police saw that a large number of people were gathering outside the Demonstration Area intending to enter the Demonstration Area. The police must be responsible for the obstruction outside the Demonstration Area and what happened afterwards.
63. Everything changed after the firing of the 87 canisters of tear gas and excessive force had been used by the police.
64. The firing of tear gas in such a way was something that no one could have known. Matters were no longer in our control. By then, the most important thing we wanted to do was to bring everyone home safe.
65. In the many days and nights following the firing of the tear gas, we had tried to use different methods to bring an earlier end of the occupation. We helped arrange a dialogue between the student leaders and senior government officials. We tried to convince others to accept an arrangement of de facto referendum as a mechanism to retreat. We organised a plaza voting. Even though most of the things we had done came to be futile, we did work very hard and exhausted all methods we could think of to achieve this goal. In the end, we surrendered to the police on 3 December 2014. The occupation at the Admiralty area ended on 11 December 2014.
66. This is a case about the improperness of laying charges relating to public nuisance.
67. As asserted by Lord Hoffmann in R v Jones (Margaret), prosecutors also have conventions to follow in a case of civil disobedience. They should behave with restraint.
68. In “Public Nuisance – A Critical Examination,” Cambridge Law Journal 48(1), March 1989, pp. 55-84, at p. 77, J. R. Spencer observed that, “...almost all the prosecutions for public nuisance in recent years seem to have taken place in one of two situations: first, where the defendant’s behaviour amounted to a statutory offence, typically punishable with a small penalty, and the prosecutor wanted a bigger or extra stick to beat him with, and secondly, where the defendant’s behaviour was not obviously criminal at all and the prosecutor could think of nothing else to charge him with.”
69. Lord Bingham in R v Rimmington [2006] 1 AC 469 at paragraph 37 endorsed the criticisms of J. R. Spencer concerning the ulterior motive of a prosecutor laying a charge of public nuisance.
70. If there is an appropriate statutory offence to cover the unlawful act in a case of civil disobedience, one would rightly ask why laying the charges of public nuisance? Even though it might not be an abuse of process, the prosecutor in this case must have breached the convention of civil disobedience applicable to him as asserted by Lord Hoffmann in R v Jones (Margaret) for failing to behave with restraint.
71. This is a case about the improperness of laying charges of conspiracy and incitement to incite.
72. Similarly, laying charges of conspiracy and incitement to incite is excessive in a case of civil disobedience and a case of the right to freedom of peaceful demonstration.
73. Pieces of evidence relied upon by the prosecution in the conspiracy charge were public statements made by us. Civil disobedience by definition must be a public act. If these public statements can be used to support the prosecution, all civil disobedience at its formation stage will be suppressed. It is meaningless to talk about civil disobedience as something honourable as no civil disobedience would have happened. Even worse, a chilling effect will be generated in society, and many legitimate speeches will be silenced. The restriction on the right to freedom of speech must be disproportionate.
74. Whether there can be an offence of incitement to incite under the Hong Kong common law is still disputable. Even if there is such an offence, laying charges of incitement to incite in a case of civil disobedience and a case of the right to freedom of peaceful demonstration must have extended culpability excessively, unreasonably and unnecessarily.
75. Since the substantial offence is the questionable offence of public nuisance, laying a charge of incitement to incite public nuisance must have extended culpability to even a manifestly unreasonable degree.
76. If the prosecutor has not acted in such an excessive and unreasonable manner and proper charges were laid, we would not have filed a defence.
77. Nonetheless, filing a defence against charges believed to be excessive and unreasonable should not be considered to be failing to comply with the conventions of civil disobedience on the part of the law-breakers as not accepting the penalties imposed by the law.
78. There are some questions that I am not in the position to answer. If the prosecutor fails to comply with the convention of civil disobedience asserted by Lord Hoffmann in R v Jones (Margaret), what will be the consequence? Who is responsible for rectifying the wrongs?
79. At the end, this is a case about Hong Kong’s rule of law and high degree of autonomy.
80. As a scholar of the rule of law and the constitutional law of Hong Kong, I believe that merely having judicial independence is not sufficient to maintain the rule of law in Hong Kong.
81. Without a genuinely democratic system, powers of the government can still be exercised arbitrarily, and the fundamental rights of citizens will not be adequately protected. Also, without democracy, it will be difficult to withstand the more and more severe encroachment on Hong Kong’s high degree of autonomy under the policy of “One Country Two Systems”. After the Umbrella Movement, there is still a long way before we can reach the destination of Hong Kong’s journey to democracy.
82. Mr Justice Tang, PJ at his Farewell Sitting (2018) 21 HKCFAR 530 at paragraphs 17-19 said, “…although judges are prepared to uphold the rule of law as it has always been understood and applied in Hong Kong, the community must be willing to support them. In what form the support should take? I think the support should be all-embracing. If the judiciary is unfairly attacked, you should hold firm and stand up for them. But, support should not only be events driven. That is not enough. It may be too late. You should endeavour to nurture an atmosphere friendly to the rule of law. We have a free press and free elections in Hong Kong. Make your voice heard and your vote count. Believe me, the price of freedom is indeed eternal vigilance. Above all else, do not give up or underestimate your strength. If we as a community insist on the rule of law, it cannot be taken from us easily. Do not make it easy.”
83. We all have our duty to defend the rule of law and the high degree of autonomy in Hong Kong.
84. I am here because I have used many years of my life and up to this very moment to defend the rule of law of Hong Kong, an integral part of Hong Kong’s high degree of autonomy. I will also never give up on striving for Hong Kong’s democracy.
85. I believe that civil disobedience can be justified by the rule of law. Civil disobedience and the rule of law share the same goal in pursuing justice. Civil disobedience is an effective way of securing the attainment of this common goal at least in the long run by creating the climate within which other means can be used to achieve that goal. (See Benny Yiu-ting Tai, “Civil Disobedience and the Rule of Law,” in Ng, M. H. (Ed.), Wong, J. D. (Ed.). (2017). Civil Unrest and Governance in Hong Kong. London: Routledge. At pp. 141-162.)
86. If we were to be guilty, we will be guilty for daring to share hope at this difficult time in Hong Kong.
87. I am not afraid or ashamed of going to prison. If this is the cup I must take, I will drink with no regret.
List of Authorities
1. Secretary for Justice v Wong Chi Fung (2018) 21 HKCFAR 35, paragraphs 70 and 72.
2. John Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Revised Edition, 1999), p. 320.
3. Martin Luther King Jr. “Letter from a Birmingham Jail,” The Journal of Negro History, Vol. 71, No. 1/4 (Winter - Autumn, 1986), pp. 38-44.
4. R v Jones (Margaret) [2007] 1 AC 136, paragraph 89.
5. UN Human Rights Committee, General Comment No 25 adopted on 12 July 1996 (on Article 25 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights), CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.7, paragraph 15 and 17.
6. Leung Kwok-hung v HKSAR (2005) 8 HKCFAR 229, paragraph 22.
7. Yeung May-wan v HKSAR (2005) 8 HKCFAR 137, paragraph 144.
8. J. R. Spencer, “Public Nuisance – A Critical Examination,” Cambridge Law Journal 48(1), March 1989, pp. 55-84, p. 77.
9. R v Rimmington [2006] 1 AC 469, paragraph 37.
10. Farewell Sitting for the Honourable Mr Justice Tang PJ (2018) 21 HKCFAR 530, Tang PJ, paragraphs 17-19.
11. Benny Yiu-ting Tai, “Civil Disobedience and the Rule of Law” in Ng, M. H. (Ed.), Wong, J. D. (Ed.). (2017). Civil Unrest and Governance in Hong Kong. London: Routledge. At pp. 141-162.
broken down意思 在 和Cindy學英文- 跟大家分享我都翻譯筆記~ break ... - Facebook 的推薦與評價
跟大家分享我都翻譯筆記~ break up 跟break down 都是有多個意思的片語,也都有「分解」但意思但是當「分解」的時候卻有細微差異! break down 指的是「化學分解」 而 ... ... <看更多>