【危險鄰居】系列六:《260艘中國漁船在厄瓜多國家海洋公園旁濫捕》
2020年7月,在加拉帕戈斯群島附近的大約260艘中國漁船聚集捕撈,激起了外交緊張局勢,並引發人們對聯合國教科文組織列為世界自然遺產周圍水域中鯊魚、魟魚和其他脆弱物種威脅的擔憂。
根據倫敦研究機構ODI 6月份的報告顯示,中國「遠洋」漁船數量是世界上最多的,共有約17,000艘船,其中約1,000艘在其他國家註冊,中國漁船所有權高度分散於各個公司和國家,使得國際組織更難以有效約束。由於氣候變遷,海洋生物數量逐漸變少,擁有世界上最多漁船的中國,更應該負起責任,禁止過度捕撈引發的海洋危機,而不是與鄰為壑貪婪的擴張。
自由開放的印太地區意味著良善治理、符合國際標準的經濟活動,以及免於威脅和脅迫的自由。若要實現這個願景,需要各國以有建設性的方式共同合作。
一起來看以下《華盛頓郵報》的文章:《260艘中國漁船在厄瓜多國家海洋公園旁濫捕》: https://reurl.cc/pykKMl
中文翻譯請見: https://reurl.cc/OqyR5D
#好鄰居壞鄰居 #聽其言觀其行 #說一套做一套 #己所不欲勿施於人 #以鄰為壑
【Dangerous Neighbor】
A free and open Indo-Pacific means good governance, economic activities that accord with international standards, and freedom from threats and coercion. Achieving this vision requires countries to work together in a constructive way.
Check out this article from Washington Post, “260 Chinese boats fish near Galapagos; Ecuador on alert”: https://reurl.cc/pykKMl
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過9,980的網紅BeautywithFei,也在其Youtube影片中提到,發問前請詳閱資訊欄並維持禮貌,一起創造更好的網路禮儀環境 Any constructive criticism is welcome. Please make our Internet a better environment. 各位朋友 我認真推這一瓶 Loreal 無瑕完美粉底液 (影片裡講...
constructive中文 在 Charles Mok 莫乃光 Facebook 的最讚貼文
【法政匯思就社會進一步動盪的聲明】
【Statement on Further Escalation of Social Unrest】
// 當體制構建不能保障市民應有的追索權,暴力兼「私了」必如落山流水跟著來,這已清晰可見。僅說無諾,何能「止暴制亂」?
// Where the system fails to provide proper recourse, vigilantism and violence proclaiming self-defence arise as simple cause and effect. Without any real commitment by the Government to de-escalate and defuse the political crisis, verbal condemnation and physical crackdown will do nothing to ‘stop violence and curb disorder’.
https://www.facebook.com/…/a.455221741311…/1474268236073377/
【法政匯思就社會進一步動盪的聲明】
【Statement on Further Escalation of Social Unrest】(Scroll for English)
1. 近日,警隊的行為就如國際特赦組織所言越見低劣。[1] 這皆因政府漠視其專家提供的建議,並以歇斯底里、毫無章法可言的策略回應持續的動盪。
2. 五個月來,政府持續容許以下情況發生,對警政問題及根本的政治危機藥石亂投:
a. 阻礙救護人員前往現場拯救傷者;[2]
b. 偏頗地處理強姦或酷刑對待被拘留人士的指控;[3]
c. 肆無忌憚地濫用武力;[4]
d. 以諸多藉口為警察的失控或報復行為辯解。[5]
3. 法政匯思強烈譴責警隊濫用武力,及其本末倒置、往往為社區添煩添亂的驅散示威者行動。警方在十一月十一日於香港中文大學(「中大」)、香港理工大學及香港大學等驅散非法集結及/或堵路行為的行動,指稱的事實根據惹人非議。[6] 在撰寫此聲明之時,警方甚至以催淚彈及橡膠子彈回應中大校長的善意,與學生發生激烈衝突,造成最少60人受傷及多人被捕。[7]
4. 歸根究底,現有的制度未能公正地調查涉及警務人員的刑事指控,乃是警民衝突的源頭。樂觀地看,這可能只是個別調查人員的疏忽;悲觀地看,這反映一種互相包庇的文化,可能已由員佐級警員到警務處處長、保安局局長甚至特首,滲透警隊及政府上下。無論是哪一個情況,這種警察橫行無忌的觀感已經令公眾對負責調查大部分罪行的警察的信任蕩然無存。這個缺口一開,刑事司法制度剩下非常有限的能力,處理失職警員。
5. 法政匯思繼續呼籲香港政府成立獨立調查委員會,調查包括六月份以來政府的治安管理手段。除了將肇事者繩之於法外,更重要的是全面檢閱香港警隊以達至結構上的改革。至今,特區政府對於這個明顯又實際的選擇不屑一顧,堅持讓一個缺乏監察權力的獨立監察警方處理投訴委員會(「監警會」)[8] 去調查警察投訴及內部調查科。這正正就是問題根源所在。
6. 監警會委派的國際專家組就這個問題發表《進展報告》。國際專家組與政府持相反意見。他們批評監警會在結構上欠缺全面調查權力,對監警會這一個輕型、監管式的體制是否能夠做出決定性的貢獻表示懷疑,更指出下一步的可能性諸如「委派一個享有所需權力的獨立調查機構以作更深程度及更廣泛的調查」,意味著一個獨立調查委員會。[9]
7. 對於近數星期暴力頻頻,政府沒有採取任何行動,只是堅拒示威者的訴求(包括成立獨立調查委員會),更稱他們為「人民的敵人」。[10] 警員們多月來非人化地濫稱示威者為「曱甴」。[11]
8. 法政匯思絕對不認同法外制裁。此立場於七月二十五日之聲明已表明。然而,當體制構建不能保障市民應有的追索權,暴力兼「私了」必如落山流水跟著來,這已清晰可見。僅說無諾,何能「止暴制亂」?
法政匯思
2019年11月15日
(PDF: https://tinyurl.com/tt2nzmr)
1. Police conduct has seen, in the words of Amnesty International, ‘another shocking low’ [1] in recent days as the Government ignored constructive feedback by its own experts and hysterically responded to the ongoing unrest without any rational strategy.
2. In particular, these allegations point to a wanton failure on the part of the Government to properly approach policing and the underlying political crisis, now in its 5th month:
a. Obstructing rescuers and ambulances from accessing the injured; [2]
b. Unfair handling of allegations of rape and torture in custody; [3]
c. Unapologetic excesses in its use of force; [4] and
d. Evasive defence of police officers acting impulsively or in retaliation. [5]
3. The Progressive Lawyers Group (the ‘PLG’) vehemently condemns the Police regarding their excessive use of force and dispersal operations which often create the chaos sought to be quelled. On 11 November, the police conducted operations in, amongst others, the Chinese University of Hong Kong (‘CUHK’), the Polytechnic University of Hong Kong and the University of Hong Kong to disperse unlawful assemblies and/or obstruction of traffic, [6] the factual basis of which has been doubted by many. As at the drafting of this Statement, as riot police responded to an olive branch by the CUHK Vice-Chancellor with tear gas and rubber bullets, severe clashes between students and riot police at CUHK are ongoing with at least 60 injured and dozens arrested. [7]
4. Nonetheless, the crux of the problem remains in the institutional failure to investigate criminal allegations involving police officers impartially. At best, it could be an omission by individual police officers in their execution of duty. At worst, it could be a culture that acquiesces and conceals wrongdoings affecting grassroot constables, the Commissioner of Police, the Secretary for Security and the Chief Executive alike. Whichever the case may be, this perception of impunity breaches the trust and confidence the public reposes in the police who are tasked with investigating most offences. With this link broken, there remains very limited recourse in the criminal justice system against rogue officers.
5. The PLG continues to call on the Hong Kong Government to appoint a Commission of Inquiry regarding, amongst others, the current approach to policing social unrest since June. Bringing wrongdoers to justice aside, the more important task is a holistic review on the Police Force and a roadmap to structural reforms. So far, the Government brushed aside this obvious and pragmatic option, insisting upon an inquiry by the Independent Police Complaints Council (‘IPCC’) [8] whose (lack of) oversight over the Complaints Against Police Office (‘CAPO’) is the very issue at the heart of the current saga.
6. Curiously, the International Expert Panel of the IPCC appointed for advice on that very inquiry seems to hold a contrary view. In their Position Statement Report of Progress, the experts pointed out ‘structural limitations in the scope and powers of the IPCC Inquiry’ and noted that ‘it remains to be seen whether a light touch, oversight body like the IPCC, can make sufficient progress to produce any decisive contribution…’ It also identified a possible next step such as ‘a deeper more comprehensive inquiry in a number of respects by an independent body with requisite powers’, alluding to a Commission of Inquiry. [9]
7. In response to the extraordinary brutalities these few weeks, the Government did nothing but maintain that it will not yield to the protesters’ demands (including an independent Commission of Inquiry) and call them ‘enemies of the people’. [10] It has not helped that the police have for months been blatantly using such a dehumanising term as ‘cockroaches’ to refer to protesters [11].
8. The PLG stands by our Statement on 25 July 2019 and does not encourage citizens to take justice into their own hands. However, it is obvious by now that where the system fails to provide proper recourse, vigilantism and violence proclaiming self-defence arise as simple cause and effect. Without any real commitment by the Government to de-escalate and defuse the political crisis, verbal condemnation and physical crackdown will do nothing to ‘stop violence and curb disorder’.
The Progressive Lawyers Group
15 November 2019
(PDF version: https://tinyurl.com/tt2nzmr)
constructive中文 在 姜冠宇醫師 Pro'spect Facebook 的精選貼文
某位出題老師批評蔡英文的 Make some "silly comments" in her speech
其實以英文搭配詞(collocation)的角度而言,這不是道地的說法。
那comment 這個字平常是用什麼形容詞去形容它?
⬇️ 我們先本於學習的心態查閱劍橋線上搭配詞字典
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/…/%E8%8B%B1%E8%AA%…/comment
好,我們並沒comment搭配silly的用法。
⬇️ 接下來,我們來看牛津線上搭配詞字典
http://oxforddictionary.so8848.com/search1?word=comment
它整理得更清楚
Comment 評論或言論,前方形容它的有兩大系列
一是被"comment"的目標,內容是正面或負面與否
正面如 fair, favourable
負面如 adverse, derogatory, disparaging, hostile, negative, sad, unfair, unfavourable
二是被這comment的形式或情境
形式如 additional comment / brief comment /editorial comment 還有 official, personal, press, public
情境如 constructive comment (建設性言論) / controversial comment 爭議性言論 / critical comment 批判性言論
關鍵在於,#因為邏輯上通常是人愚蠢而不是言論本身
你可以說very silly of her to make comment
但是很少說silly comment,因為"silly"通常是形容人的
--
什麼是搭配詞呢? 以中文舉例
我們會說"生日快樂",而不會說"生日愉快"
這是在學單字以及文法之外,忽略了搭配詞形成的語塊
這是建議大家學英文的一個不可忽略的方向喔!
constructive中文 在 BeautywithFei Youtube 的最讚貼文
發問前請詳閱資訊欄並維持禮貌,一起創造更好的網路禮儀環境
Any constructive criticism is welcome. Please make our Internet a better environment.
各位朋友
我認真推這一瓶 Loreal 無瑕完美粉底液
(影片裡講錯了,Fresh wear Foundation的中文翻譯是無瑕完美粉底液才對)
真的完完全全是Giorgio Armani的平替版dupe
無論妝感、遮瑕力、清透度、持妝度都不相上下
而且價錢只是GA的五分之一!!!(我的天)
實在是小資女的福音
廢話不多說,自己看影片吧!
Giorgio Armani 完美絲絨水慕絲粉底液實測影片
https://youtu.be/iH5HoWzKMTE
喜歡我的影片記得幫我按個讚👍
別忘了訂閱我的頻道喔❤️
也可以去加入我的Facebook粉絲專頁
更多精彩的美國生活也在Instgram與你們分享
想要跟菲菲分享任何彩妝或是生活都可以tag #beautywithfei
Love n Peace
-
✔️Loreal 無瑕完美粉底液 // #405 30mL 12USD
台灣https://ppt.cc/f7f2wx
美國 https://bit.ly/3jdW6Sx
✔️Giorgio Armani 完美絲絨水慕斯粉底液 // #2 30ml 64 USD
台灣https://ppt.cc/fEQvax
Selfridge:https://bit.ly/2MBrWfT
美國:https://ppt.cc/f7i7Nx
-
💄本日妝容💄/Makeup today
底妝/Face
Loreal 24H Fresh Wear Foundation // 405
Giorgio Armani Power Fabric Foundation // 2
Innisfree No Sebum mineral powder
Clinique Cheek Pop // Melon Pop
Nars Highlighter // Hot Sand
眼妝/Eyes
Bobbi Brown UltraViolet Eyeshadow Palette
1028 Mascara
唇妝/Lips
Heme 精萃水亮唇膏 // 03
隱形眼鏡/Lens
ColorCL SIESTA Black Monthly Cloud Gray
-
本影片產品無任何廣告意圖,盜圖必究
上方部分連結為分潤連結,若點選並購買時我會賺取些許佣金
這些利潤將再次投資到 beautywithfei 頻道
感謝有你/妳的支持,讓我能夠創作出更好的內容
This is not a sponsored video.
Affiliate links above provide a small commission off of each purchase, which enables me to invest back into my channel and purchase more products to review.
-
My skin type is dry and sensitive
The foundation I use
Estee Lauder Double Wear Foundation // 1W1
Shuemura Light Bulb Foundation // 774
Wet N Wild Photo Focus Foundation in // Soft Ivory
Revlon Color Stay Foundation // 150 Buff
Giorgio Armani Power Fabric // 02
Hourglass Vanish Stick Foundation // Bisque
我的肌膚是混合性偏乾,T字會輕微出油,鼻翼兩側偏乾
-
Hi everyone my name is Fei. You can follow my social media if you want to know more about me and my life. Please subscribe my channel and give me a thumb up if you enjoy this video. Love n Peace❤️👼
Facebook:菲菲 Fei
Instgram:BeautywithFei
Business Email:goo102383@gmail.com
![post-title](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/VepXK30gMVg/hqdefault.jpg)
constructive中文 在 Active Constructive Responding 主動地有建設性回應 - YouTube 的推薦與評價
... <看更多>