定宇摘要分享日本新任首相岸田的幾個施政方針,來源為日經亞洲Nikkei Asia和其他國際媒體、智庫…
定宇先說個人初步判斷,岸田的施政方針,是對台灣有利的架構;而岸田的內閣人事,會有安倍、麻生的影響力,而這二位都是強硬友台派;在區域安全上,美日同盟結合國際夥伴共同對抗侵略式擴張的中國,將會是立即看得見的外交方向,加上強化自衛隊的主張,日本與中國的摩擦將加大。
日本自民黨新任黨魁,也是第100任內閣首相岸田文雄Fumio Kishida,對付中國將是岸田內閣的首要問題,面對中國侵略式的外交和經濟,岸田提出深沈的警告,也將在各個面向努力,確保日本的安全和利益。
經濟是岸田施政的焦點,「經濟安全」會是他的優先工作,如何在地緣政治上,確保日本經濟安全。
面對美中爭奪科技主導權,日本與美國、台灣、韓國將協調確保戰略物資供應鏈,例如半導體。
將在「分配正義」上著手,要把經濟的果實分享給經濟上的中下階層。
在軍事上,將強化自衛隊角色和戰力,特別強調,面對鄰近的威脅,日本必須具備源頭打擊敵人基地的導彈能力,而不是滿足於攔截來襲的飛彈而已。
在外交上,強調維護自由、民主、國際規範、人權這些基本價值,與理念相同的國家,像美國、歐盟、印度、澳洲等,共同對抗獨裁政體,也會在印太地區扮演更積極的角色。
在人權上,將設置「首相人權輔佐官」,將發動調查包括新疆維吾爾族等人權議題。
在黨務上,岸田提出黨改革方案中,最受矚目就是黨幹部任期以一年一任最多三任為限。目前幹事長以輔選有功的麻生派眾議員甘利明呼聲最高,岸田也承諾將重用其他三位競選者河野太郎、高市早苗及野田聖子。
Dealing with China would be a top priority in his government, Fumio Kishida, a contender to succeed Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga, told Nikkei, expressing “deep alarm” at Beijing’s aggressive behavior on the diplomatic and economic fronts.
To protect “basic values such as freedom, democracy, the rule of law and human rights, we will work with those that share the same values, such as the U.S., Europe, India and Australia, to stand against authoritarian systems,” Kishida said in an recent interview.
Economic security is high on his agenda. As Washington and Beijing compete for technological dominance, Japan, the U.S., Taiwan and South Korea are scrambling to coordinate to secure supply chains for strategically important goods such as semiconductors.
“I will protect our nation’s geopolitical interests with a focus on the economy,” he said.
On defense, Kishida emphasized the need for the capabilities to strike enemy missile bases to prevent to an imminent attack. “Even if missile defense systems block a first attack,” having capabilities to attack enemy bases could “protect people’s lives if a second or more shots are being launched,” he said.
同時也有49部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過100萬的網紅Taiwan Bar,也在其Youtube影片中提到,#歡迎光臨臺灣吧 #動畫臺灣史 #HistoryofTaiwan #WhiteTerror #democracy 這集有字幕可以開 -- 想要支持臺灣吧持續製作內容? 快加入臺灣吧「灣吧好捧油」:https://lihi1.com/CizZn 臺灣的民主之路是怎麼走來的? 今天就帶大家重返...
「democracy in taiwan」的推薦目錄:
- 關於democracy in taiwan 在 王定宇 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於democracy in taiwan 在 官逼民反_人民當家 Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於democracy in taiwan 在 Eric's English Lounge Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於democracy in taiwan 在 Taiwan Bar Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於democracy in taiwan 在 Ghost Island Media 鬼島之音 Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於democracy in taiwan 在 Ghost Island Media 鬼島之音 Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於democracy in taiwan 在 How Democracy Emerged in Taiwan: How the KMT Let Go 的評價
democracy in taiwan 在 官逼民反_人民當家 Facebook 的最佳貼文
巴黎著名人權和宗教自由律師、學者帕特里夏·杜瓦爾觀察到,當她第一次得知太極門案時,對台灣政府忽視國際批評風險感到驚訝。另一方面,她在法國的經歷告訴她,有時宗教和精神少數派的反對者並沒有考慮到這些風險。杜瓦爾指出,台灣於 2009 年批准並將《公民權利和政治權利國際公約》(ICCPR)和《經濟、社會和文化權利國際公約》(ICESCR)納入其國家法律。這些,正如歐洲人權法院和其他國際司法管轄區所解釋的那樣,包括在稅收和宗教自由決定中,
Patricia Duval, a well-known Paris human rights and religious liberty attorney and scholar, observed that when she first learned of the Tai Ji Men case, she was surprised that the Taiwan government was ignoring the risk of being criticized internationally. On the other hand, her experience in France told her that sometimes opponents of religious and spiritual minorities do not take these risks into account. Duval noted that Taiwan in 2009 ratified and included in its national law the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). These, as they have been interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights and other international jurisdictions, including in tax and religious liberty decisions, should have been applied to the Tai Ji Men case and led to its solution, but they didn’t.
“人權無國界”的聯合創始人兼董事威利·福特(Willy Fautré)表示,台灣是一個民主國家,但沒有一個民主國家是完美的。太極門案讓台灣有機會像照鏡子一樣看到其民主制度的不完善之處。Fautré 說,現在應該立即解決這個問題。
Willy Fautré, co-founder and director of Human Rights Without Frontiers, stated that Taiwan is a democracy, but no democracy is perfect. The Tai Ji Men case offers to Taiwan an opportunity to see, as if in a mirror, what is imperfect in its democratic system. It should now be solved, Fautré said, without delay.
https://bitterwinter.org/scholars-discuss-transitional-justice-tai-ji-men-case/
democracy in taiwan 在 Eric's English Lounge Facebook 的最佳解答
[演講技巧] 用對的語言,說給對的人聽:看蕭美琴的 ALEC 演講
Presentality再次幫同學分享政治人物演講技巧。這次Andrew Yang 分析的對象是現任駐美代表蕭美琴 (Ambassador Bi-khim Hsiao)!
★★★★★★★★★★★★
這幾天看到網路上很多人稱讚蕭美琴在美國給的一場演講,是在 American Legislative Exchange Council 大會給的。Youtube 上還有完整的影片。
我就想要從一個英文撰稿人跟演講教練的角度,看一下她到底是哪裡講的好?
Ok, let’s go. First, the speech video itself: https://youtu.be/5ozMcauCjbs
★★★★★★★★★★★★
📌 連開頭都跟傳統台灣官員不一樣
她一開頭,就用一種很 personal 的方式回應主辦單位的介紹:
Thank you Karen for that kind introduction…
畢竟用人家的 first name,就感覺比較親切對不對?通常外交場合,都是用 last name 的。
★★★★★★★★★★★★
📌 而且她跟台灣大部分官員用英文演講的時候有一個很不一樣的地方:
她講話的時候,是看著聽眾的 lol。
你可能會覺得搞啥啊,講話不是就要看著對方嗎?但其實很多台灣官員可能是語文能力關係,或是沒時間把稿子弄熟,演講的時候大部分的時間是盯著稿子的,所以跟聽眾的 connection 真的就會打折扣。
★★★★★★★★★★★★
📌 另外一個小細節,就是她的節奏。
台灣很多官員不只是唸稿,還唸的斷斷續續,不停的卡住,蕭美琴就不一樣,講的算是非常流暢,尤其到後半段整個進入一個很好的 flow。
大家可能會覺得這只是英文好,但其實不完全是。我們也看過很多英文比蕭大使還要好的人,演講超級卡。
★★★★★★★★★★★★
📌 講「對的字」,給對的聽眾
第二個細節,就是她的用字遣詞。
我們注意這裡:
I’m so honored to be able to be here in person, to use this occasion to express my gratitude… to the so many outstanding freedom-loving legislators around the United States.
還有這裡,講到主辦單位 ALEC 頒獎給蔡總統,她說:
It is also recognition for the freedom-loving people of Taiwan, and our determination to keep Taiwan free.
我們要指出的共通點在哪裡?
對,就是 “Freedom-loving”。
我在美國住十幾年,從大學到研究所到華府工作,周圍的朋友大多都是左派的,我不記得他們之中有任何人,任何一次,說過 “freedom-loving” 或甚至強調 freedom。這代表蕭大使真的很會對「對的人」說「對的話」。
她知道這群聽眾是美國保守派的,「自由」對他們來說是絕對的價值跟原則。所以一說完這段,就迎來熱烈的掌聲。
我猜今天如果蕭大使對的是左派的聽眾,她肯定不會一直提到這些字眼。
她也不忘用 “side-by-side” 的語法,來強調台灣跟美國的價值。很多台灣官員都只會制式的重複:We share with you the values of freedom and democracy, blah blah blah…
但蕭大使就做一點變化:
I often say that you are living in the land of the free.
We are living on the island of the free.
Good line,又迎來一些掌聲。
*Btw, 為什麼是 “land of the free” 而不是 land of free 或是 free land?因為自由的不是土地,而是「人」,所以美國人才會說 “we are a free people”。所以 “the free” 代表的其實是「自由的人」。
★★★★★★★★★★★★
📌 掌控敘事 (Narrative)
我們再來看一段非常不錯的:
We also believe that it is only in societies that respect the freedom of speech, where true innovation can propel technology that advances human progress, instead of technology that is abused and used for surveillance and controlling their people.
美國時常有很多的辯論:我們應該要把什麼項目放在第一?科技進步?經濟成長?還是民主價值?
我在美國唸外交時,幫我們上課的前官員也會說:「我們先不要硬推民主,而是先幫助這些國家經濟成長,之後他們自然就會變成民主國家。」
蕭美琴的這段,就是一個反向的論述:如果沒有言論自由,就不會有真正的創新,因為科技會被用來控制人民,而不是真的改善大家的生活。
這就是敘事 (narrative) 的重點:不是只是提供一大堆 information 給大家 (this is what most people do),而是告訴大家要怎麼去「詮釋」這些資訊 (跟我們時常在說的 “framing” 有關)。
絕大部分台灣官員出去演講的時候,是完全沒有核心論述的,就只有提供一堆人家沒興趣也永遠不會記得的 information。
Can you spell B-O-R-I-N-G?
引用對方可以體會的經歷
講完一些硬一點的議題之後,她把話題帶到比較個人的層面:
I’m an ambassador now, I work in Washington, DC, but I used to be like you, I came from a legislature in Taiwan, I understand that all politics are local. And when we go back to our constituents, we wanna deliver on economic progress, we wanna deliver on the common values that we share.
說到個人經歷,突然感覺比較輕鬆,溫和對不對?這是一種非常好跟聽眾建立連結的方式,畢竟不是每一位外交官,都有跟聽眾同樣的經歷,所以她很會利用自己的強項。
但她這麼說,可是有目的:把聽眾的注意力帶到 “economic progress for constituents” 之後,她馬上用大家可以理解的數字,提醒聽眾台灣對美國「地方經濟」的重要性:
We’re in the State of Utah now, [Taiwan’s] size is only 15% the size of Utah, but we are the 8th largest consumer of US agricultural products in the world.
然後還不忘轉換成人均的數字!
Which means, per capita wise, each Taiwanese citizen is the second largest consumer — per capita wise — the second largest consumer of American agricultural products.
蠻厲害的對不對?但這樣還沒有結束喔!
★★★★★★★★★★★★
📌 需要完整分析的同學請留言「用對的語言,說給對的人聽!」。
還有, 快快訂閱Presentality,即時收到這些精闢分析!!!
圖片出處: https://bit.ly/3u6mHpL
democracy in taiwan 在 Taiwan Bar Youtube 的最佳解答
#歡迎光臨臺灣吧 #動畫臺灣史
#HistoryofTaiwan #WhiteTerror #democracy
這集有字幕可以開
--
想要支持臺灣吧持續製作內容?
快加入臺灣吧「灣吧好捧油」:https://lihi1.com/CizZn
臺灣的民主之路是怎麼走來的?
今天就帶大家重返臺灣戒嚴時代。
為何會有戒嚴?
黨國體制又是怎麼一回事?
這些看似政治歸政治的事情,
如何影響臺灣人的生活與命運呢?
讓我們一起複習 動畫臺灣史ep6
練練英文吧,並把這部影片
分享給你的外國捧油吧!
參考書目:
吳乃德,《百年追求:台灣民主運動的故事》卷二,臺北:衛城出版,2013
胡慧玲,《百年追求:台灣民主運動的故事》卷三,臺北:衛城出版,2013
周婉窈,《少年臺灣史》臺北:玉山社,2014
遠流臺灣館,《臺灣史小事典》臺北:遠流出版公司,2000
--
🍺 想了解 #臺灣吧 多一點點
訂閱YouTube,新片不漏追| https://lihi.cc/0SEYv
瞧瞧Facebook,會有YT沒有的東西|https://lihi1.com/KUtvp
追蹤Instagram,限動看個夠|https://lihi1.com/OD9Bb
加入 LINE官方帳號,訊息直接傳給你|https://lihi1.com/Nk3KE
--
臺灣吧線上賣場,很好買慎入|http://taiwanbar.shoplineapp.com/
合作邀約,來酒吧聊聊吧|business@taiwanbar.cc
democracy in taiwan 在 Ghost Island Media 鬼島之音 Youtube 的最讚貼文
“Democracy is a failure” - that’s the narrative the Chinese Communist Party has been trying to plant over the past year and hopes to take root in international discourse and in the minds of its 1.4 billion citizens. This disinformation has heavy implications for democracy in Taiwan, and it’s never been as serious as it is now.
CCP disinformation methods are detailed in a report issued late last year titled “Deafening Whispers” by Doublethink Lab, a Taiwanese organization whose mission is to strengthen democracy through digital defense. The report has just been made available in English.
This interview was recorded in January 2021 when the Chinese-version of the report was first published.
Online disinformation and influence operations affect offline real-world defense and security. Fake news is a global issue and this is The Taiwan Take. Today’s guest is Dr. Puma Shen (沈伯洋), chairman of Doublethink Lab (台灣民主實驗室) and an assistant professor at National Taipei University.
Deafening Whispers: https://medium.com/doublethinklab/deafening-whispers-f9b1d773f6cd
Today’s episode is hosted by J.R. Wu - Chief of the Secretariat for INDSR (Institute for National Defense and Security Research) in Taiwan. Wu is a former journalist with nearly two decades of media experience in the US and Asia. She has led news bureaus for Reuters and Dow Jones.
Support us on Patreon: http://patreon.com/taiwan
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ghostislandme
SHOW CREDIT
JR Wu (Host)
Emily Y. Wu (Producer): https://twitter.com/emilyywu
Alice Yeh (Editing | Researcher)
Music: MB013KF2YKVG19A
A Ghost Island Media production
www.ghostisland.media
democracy in taiwan 在 Ghost Island Media 鬼島之音 Youtube 的最佳貼文
PTT is one of the most open social media platforms in the Chinese language. Though it’s not more populous than Facebook, it’s arguably more impactful than Facebook here in Taiwan. It’s a reflection of Taiwan's spirited democracy, and it’s used heavily as a source for local journalists.
We speak with two INDSR researchers on a year-long project, “A Pilot Study on PTT in the Context of Influence Operations” (批踢踢影響力作戰前導研究)which attempts to identify CCP state actors on the platfor. The researchers are Oddis J.F. Tsai (Policy Analyst at the Division of Defense Strategy and Resources) and Dr. Jui-Ming Hung (Assistant Research Fellow at the Division of Defense Strategy and Resources).
The paper lays out mechanics and - through quantitative analysis - identifies types of suspect behavior on the world’s largest non-commercial, forum-based, open-source online bulletin board system in the Chinese language. This interview was recorded in January 2021 after the paper was published by INDSR.
Today’s host is J.R. Wu - a non-resident advisor at INDSR (Institute for National Defense and Security Research) in Taiwan. Wu is a former journalist with nearly two decades of media experience in the US and Asia. She has led news bureaus for Reuters and Dow Jones.
Support us on Patreon: http://patreon.com/taiwan
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ghostislandme
EPISODE CREDIT
JR Wu (Host)
Emily Y. Wu (Producer, Editing): https://twitter.com/emilyywu
Alice Yeh (Researcher)
Music: MB01I2MT5YPZMMW
A Ghost Island Media production
www.ghostisland.media
democracy in taiwan 在 How Democracy Emerged in Taiwan: How the KMT Let Go 的推薦與評價
The Kuomintang or KMT ruled Taiwan for several decades with an iron fist. Sharing many of the Leninist principles with that of the Chinese ... ... <看更多>