關於 dpp election case ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

賴芳雄教授：蔡英文是國民黨安插在綠營的木馬？

【民報編者按：賴芳雄教授是台中人，台灣大學畢業，美國堪薩斯州立大學博士，在美國麻薩諸塞大學羅爾分校塑膠工程系擔任教授三十幾年，今年退休（名譽教授）。羅爾分校的塑膠工程專業在全美排名第一，也是美國第一個授予塑膠工程本科學位的大學，賴教授是這方面的資深台灣人學者。他的這篇英文投書給了Taipei Times（台北時報），但不被刊出。對權力者的監督和評論自由是一個國家民主的重要根基。本刊獲得這篇英文後翻譯刊出，以饗讀者。】

我一直很好奇，為什麼關於蔡英文女士的博士學位問題持續了這麼長時間。這個爭議從很多角度來講都是很特別的。從學院的角度來講，這個問題應該早就解決了，因為一個學位（的有無）不是一個模糊不清、模棱兩可、或者會引起歧義的問題。這裡只有一個真實，要麼蔡女士獲得了博士學位，要麼蔡女士沒有獲得。林環牆教授展示了他的調查結果，並且得到了其他教授的佐證（賀德芬教授，徐永泰教授等）。蔡英文女士的一個捍衛者是李敦厚教授 。在典型、正常的教育體制中，應該是蔡女士本人回應這個事件。這是一個一天就可以解決的問題。然而，蔡女士卻指控教授們毀謗，甚至到法院起訴他們。這種情形的回應，在學術界是前所未有、從未聽說過的。

基於如此，對此案唯一合理的理解是：蔡女士的博士學位問題不是一個學術問題，而是一個政治問題。根據她本人、總統府和她的支持者們的回應，我們只能得到一個合理的結論：蔡女士沒有通過正常的、公平合理的學術渠道獲得博士學位。事實上，有一些學位是可以用金錢購買到的。

更值得人們深思的是，我們必須質問，蔡女士為什麼不承認這個事實、了結這件事呢？因為是否有博士學位並不是做中華民國總統的必須條件。事實是，她如果承認這個事實，就會使所謂的 「中華民國」這個虛幻崩潰。30多年以來，國民黨成功地利用了蔡英文這個植入了民進黨的特洛伊木馬。台灣人民被欺騙，而且台灣人民必須承認：國民黨吞享了我們上次大選的午餐（成果）。我第一次被騙，無恥的是你；我被騙第二次，那是我的恥辱。

賴芳雄教授英文投書如下：

Dear Editor,

I have been curious how did the issue of Ms. Ing-wen Tsai's Ph.D. degree has been dragging for such a long time. This controversy is unique in many ways. From the academy standpoint, this issue shall have long been resolved. An academic degree is not an ambiguous issue. There is only one truth, either Ms. Tsai has earned her Ph.D. degree, or she did not earn it. Prof. Hwan Lin has presented the results of his research, supported by other professors (Ho, Hsu, and others). One of her academic defenders is Prof. Lee Tun-Hou. In a typical educational setting, it is up to Ms. Tsai to present her case. The matter can be resolved within a day. Instead, Ms. Tsai was accusing the professors of defamation and sued them in court. This kind of response is unheard of in the academy.

Hence, the only reasonable understanding is that Ms. Tsai's Ph.D. degree is not an academic issue, rather than a political one. Judging from her responses and by her office and supporters, we cannot but reach a reasonable conclusion. Ms. Tsai did not earn her Ph.D. degree through the standard process fair and square. Indeed, some degrees are available for sale.

More significantly, we must ask why Ms. Tsai would not admit the truth and move on, since a Ph. D. degree is not required to be a president of ROC. Her admission of the fact would result in the collapse of the myth of the so-called Republic of China. KMT brilliantly used Ms. Tsai as a Trojan horse in DPP for more than 30 years. The people of Taiwan were duped and must admit that KMT ate our lunch in the last election. . Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice shame on me.

Sincerely,

Francis Lai

Professor Emeritus
Department of Plastics Engineering
University of Massachusetts Lowell

——原載《民報》：
https://www.peoplenews.tw/news/7bf19796-6f81-451a-8777-bb2da71bd623

【連署救台南森林🌳🌳🌳】

只為了節省一分鐘的行車時間要花費2.6億元砍掉一堆老樹

「希望環境可以被保留，出外遊子可以喜歡你的家鄉，你是可以回家鄉生活、工作、談戀愛的。
　
🌳希望上百顆的樹可以被保留，這塊地方可以像亞馬遜的叢林是地球的肺一樣，希望『堀仔頭小森林』可以是『西港的肺』，不希望已經被破壞的地球再有更多污染，希望這塊土地的動物棲地可以不要被破壞，牠們可以活下來，一樣可以在這裡生活、談戀愛。
　
🏡希望全台的居民，可以不要留存一種「開路蓋屋就是發展」的一種舊式思維，希望對於一個地方可以有更多的想像，可以思索十年後、二十年後，你會希望待在一個什麼樣的地方，那是你的選擇，一起走出一條真正永續的路。」——西港青年 鄭敦文
　
我們可以一起：
1. 加入連署💪https://goo.gl/WtDeE8
2. 邀請更多人加入連署
3. 幫忙分享 反西港外環道不當開闢自救會粉專的任何訊息
4. 本尊直接來現場出力陪伴

[ 緊急！樹的命危通知 Emergency。9/1 - 9/7 台南西港堀仔頭小森林 需要急救 ]

懶人包(有重點簡單明瞭):
https://www.civilmedia.tw/archives/67647

🌎 反西港外環道不當開闢自救會 ✊ ( Sign Up if you love nature and care about people )

Sign Up:
https://sites.google.com/…/protect-xigan…/%E9%A6%96%E9%A0%81

我已經在台南西港堀仔頭以生態村作為抵抗<西港外環道擋拆大作戰>駐村7天(超開心的這裡：早上張開眼睛在竹林與芭蕉葉之間醒來，走著走著就有樹抱，下午跟好友們一起煮飯揮鋤頭，大家都很愛彼此，也很愛樹。)，每天都跟其他藝術家學習怎麼在田裡生活，瞭解植被，學習如何能不輕易浪費資源。如果樹木被砍光了，土壤就跟著貧瘠，再來就不能種田，不能種田之後連土也不能吃，然後國家就會進口農產品，進口當然是要省成本找那種最便宜的，最便宜的當然是最大廠ㄉ，然後進回來之後再說國外的月亮圓要課稅。再來就好像是便宜得賣你，像是地瓜粉一包不到50元，你去買50元的地瓜回來做地瓜粉看看，看你做出多少地瓜粉？然後基改的農場品進來之後，再進國外進口的藥，「哇，米勾進靠欸，啾賀欸，緊來團購幾勒。有健保啦哩嘛多領一些藥。」開診所，假借仁慈之名說要懸壺濟世開醫院，其實啦~D賽叫你沒事多喝水但是也要多看醫生下禮拜還要回診。然後開一些爛學校，讓你現在覺得便利商店跟你說吸管塑膠袋盡量用這樣很正常(以前塑膠袋還不用錢喔，真的有在黑喔)，反正你的國家乾淨的能源愈少(乾淨的樹, 清新的空氣, 透徹的水)，我的帝國就相對強勢。

樹木與植被是大地之母
金錢則只是龐氏的商品
人類則是大地之母的孩子

我們都可以更不自私一點
各取所需 珍惜這塊孕育我們的土地 不要浪費資源

讓植被永流存 也才會有健康又乾淨的空氣跟水質
才不會生出壞掉歪掉的傻B
惡性循環的破壞地球。

如果樹被砍盡殺絕🌎，我們沒有好空氣，也沒有好水質，這樣就只剩下吃土，然後喝金屬水。乍看之下你會變成驚奇似超人，或是金剛狼🙊。精子跟卵子就開始畸形🦑，生出來的就怪怪的，頭腦想什麼都很難理解 — 像是在西港堀仔頭花2.6億來開發一條節省57秒的道路。

從今天開始也ok👌🏻
不要再把竹筷包在便當盒裡面，養樂多丟在塑膠袋裡面，方便又輕鬆得丟進那一桶。也不要隨地亂丟垃圾，像是菸屁股。塑膠掉到地上，融化到土地裡，再進到水。我們的飲食都超塑🤑。

今天西港在蓋新的廚房
因為舊的要強拆了
這裡很急迫得需要人手

在這裡我們吃自己種的 🍎🥑🌽🍅🥕
用木材的灰燼洗碗
洗澡沒有化學的沐浴乳
只有乾淨的水源
與對土地滿滿的愛

所以你人來就好。一個人也可以很ok。

English:
http://newbloommag.net/…/28/sigang-tainan-preservation-fest/

這裡的生態藝術村已經持續100多天了，還會繼續下去，可能至死不渝，一直到底。

我們會在怪手來的時候把自己綁在樹上，如果暴政要砍樹就要先砍我們。(我們已經有7個人住在樹上了，如果你們要報名也可以。除了教你蓋樹屋以外，還帶你採好吃的地瓜葉，晚上則有得Jam。）🌗

When the wrecking cars come, we will wrap ourselves on the trees, so that they can't kill the trees 💯, they would have to kill us first, which is 🈲. And we won't stop loving the trees.😍🌲🌲🌲👍

As now we're all "connected". 🌏 For example, if all the trees gone/killed in Taiwan. You'll definitely be affected and inevitably. Just a matter of time. Or your decedents would likely suffer. No clean water no fresh water, everywhere, no one can get away of this. If we have terrible water and disgusting air. One day they will all become part of your children. America, Europe, Asia, Australia, all the same. And we sincerely don't want that at all. 😞😣😧😱😨😰

[ 全台各地有很多的強制徵收案(搶錢案)，我們的生態藝術村已經集結很多的藝術家與音樂家，準備要在怪手來的時候跟他們好好的用心傳唱愛地球，如果你想要駐村也歡迎聯絡。這裡有各式各樣的奇耙，像是會蓋廚房的吉他手兼鼓手，不懂和弦卻貝斯彈得如此匠心獨運。當然也有很一般的人－就單純只是愛地球，愛護大自然，跟你我都一樣。]

樹或著是你。

English References Below - - - By Tony Coolidge & 反西港外環道不當開闢自救會 - - -👨🏽‍🌾

Real Democracy in Taiwan in Jeopardy

Taiwan has had a reputation of being a shining light of Democracy in Asia. That reputation has been tarnished in the past 10 years, but the Sunflower Movement, a movement of courageous YOUNG people, gave Taiwanese a sign of hope.

President Tsai Ing-wen’s election victory signaled greater hope for change and progressive policy changes in Taiwan. However, her difficulties have most people in Taiwan doubting the possibility of meaningful change.

What has become more obvious over time is that the leadership, whether KMT or DPP, have all been instrumental in policies and practices that are deemed unfair or unjust to different groups in Taiwan.

As discussed in this recent article in New Bloom Magazine (http://newbloommag.net/.../sigang-tainan-preservation-fest/) conflicts between youth activists has not decreased with the current administration. What the youth of Taiwan sees as injustice continues on every level of government. It may be time to consider significant reform in the way the government works. Without serious reform, politicians can legally appropriate government funding for projects that do little for their communities, but put money in the pockets of their friends and family members. And, this has far greater consequences than the waste of public funds.

I have been following closely a case of forced land appropriation in Sigang District of Tainan City, and have grown to admire the courage and resourcefulness of a growing group of young “tree protectors,” led by TC Cheng. This organic farmer respects his trees that his grandfather planted 80 years ago, and they are one of the few remaining forests in the area, providing a haven for many animal species. He also wants to protect the local culture, including the Japanese railroad line that runs along the proposed highway route. TC wants to protect the natural and cultural identity of the community, before it is wiped out by unnecessary construction.

If you ask the local politicians, the proposed “bypass” highway is important to the local economy, although a closer inspection may cause one to doubt their logic. One thing is likely. Whomever bought the land near the highway site will profit. Unfortunately, these local politicians have been able to have most of the locals buy into their reasons, so local support for protecting the trees has not been strong.

Local community groups and associations have come together to propose a compromise in this case. They have created a new plan for the road development that is not a “bypass” road, but rather a “cultural heritage road,” which will preserve the oldest trees and develop the local culture, so people will WANT TO COME to the community. THAT is what would help the local economy.

But, the local politicians and Tainan City government don’t want to offer the patience to evaluate and consider the plan.

That leaves us with a confrontation. Any confrontation is a risky proposition to the bulldozer drivers, the developers, the police and to the politicians. They all could get bad publicity, which could give Tainan City Mayor Lai a black mark for any upcoming Presidential election.

More importantly, the tree defenders have the qualities of courage and leadership that Taiwan needs. We need to listen to young leaders, not push them aside them for the sake of short-sighted profit. This reporter will do what he can to document the developments, and pray for everyone’s safety.

It seems that is all we have left, when the corrupt, broken system leaves no other alternatives. Please PRAY with me for the safety of these young heroes.

Without government reform, Taiwan will lose its natural habitats, cultural identity, and young heroes for its future generations.

RELATED OTHER RESOURCES:

https://www.facebook.com/1578009422461674/videos/1867505280178752/

https://goo.gl/photos/wVQwTVYaLKXjZgLJ7

https://goo.gl/photos/qZoTE9b3BCuWezKZ6

https://photos.app.goo.gl/vAmuLakUJ8LuEsVe2

https://goo.gl/photos/3u8zveiEfJUAXLdD6

https://goo.gl/photos/4mnnHddPcP554Fio7

https://goo.gl/photos/h2ezkmrBTKbNub3t5

https://goo.gl/photos/4yZFh8Vh8VSDqzEy5

https://goo.gl/photos/BWv1As8Kx4yqBcZv8

https://goo.gl/photos/3LfdCBQXWQgSiFDf6

https://goo.gl/photos/MKSZnS4JSdmg9e5C7

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bxdl7QsQa7s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7mE4hUl1g4

【亞洲究竟何時才會通過同性婚姻？】（中譯）

Foreign Policy 於日前（11/30) 刊出專文報導台灣婚姻平權法案進程，文章以伴侶盟發起「婚姻平權革命陣線」，於 2014/10/5 彩虹圍城行動中，群眾把婚姻平權四個大球推入立院作為開頭。精要勾勒了近年來台灣婚姻平權發展簡史，並詳盡分析了目前法案風雲詭譎的政治情勢，報導也委婉但明確點出，婚姻平權法案的通過與否，正在考驗著蔡總統的領導能力與政治誠信。

原文 參見
http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/11/30/marriage-equality-in-taiwan-isnt-a-done-deal-tsai-ing-wen-legislation-lgbt-taipei/?wp_login_redirect=0
作者/LINDA VAN DER HORST
2016年11月30日
中文翻譯：Tasha Chang

標題：When Will Asia Finally Have Same-Sex Marriage?
亞洲究竟何時才會通過同性婚姻？？
Taiwan is on the verge of becoming the first Asian government to legalize marriage equality. But the public is deeply divided.
台灣即將成為亞洲第一個同性婚姻合法化的國家，但輿論仍高度分歧。
In October 2014, a crowd at an LGBT rights rally in Taipei, one of many, lobbed four large red balloons emblazoned with the Chinese characters for marriage equality into the fenced courtyard of Taiwan’s legislature. At that time, a comfortable majority of Taiwanese supported same-sex marriage; a number of polls in the self-governing island of 23 million indicated as much, with one showing as many as 71 percent in favor. But several initiatives to amend the law to achieve marriage equality, first mooted in 2003, have not been successful. Two years later, three marriage equality bills now sit on legislators’ desks; although international media have been quick to announce that Taiwan stands on the cusp of being the first government in Asia to achieve marriage equality, the island’s public seems deeply divided. In the latest poll on the subject, released on Nov. 29, 46 percent of respondents supported marriage equality, while 45 percent opposed it. Meanwhile, Taiwan’s lawmakers and its civil society have been more cautious than recent headlines in Western media suggest.

2014年10月，在架起拒馬的立法院外，有一大群為了同志權益發聲的群眾，高推著四顆分別寫著「婚」、「姻」、「平」、「權」四字的紅色大球，推往立法院的方向。當時，在有著2,300萬人口的台灣，有絕大多數民眾都支持婚姻平權，幾個民意調查也顯示同樣的結果，其中有個調查的支持度甚至還高達71%。然而，最早於2003年所發動，接續欲修法以達成婚姻平權的數個提案，最後都無疾而終。兩年後，三套版本的婚姻平權法案現正擺在立法委員的案前等待審議。雖然國際媒體迅速下了判斷宣告台灣即將成為亞洲第一個達成婚姻平權的國家，但台灣的民意似乎仍高度分歧。最近一次於今年11月29日公布的一份調查指出，46%的受訪者支持婚姻平權，另有45%的受訪者表示反對。同時，相較於西方國際媒體樂觀的報導走向，台灣的立法委員與公民社會的態度反而較為小心謹慎。

Island-wide marriage equality initiatives have been unsuccessful in spite of growing support over decades. Even without national legislation, many local governments in Taiwan now allow same-sex couples to participate in collective weddings and to record their partnership in household registries across the island, although neither action confers any legal rights.

過去數十年，即便婚姻平權的支持度越來越高，推動婚姻平權的行動卻屢遭挫敗。雖然中央尚未立法保障同志權益，台灣有許多地方政府已開放同性伴侶參與聯合婚禮並開放同性伴侶註記，然無論是聯合婚禮還是同性伴侶註記，皆未能給予同性伴侶法律上的權利。

To many, the election of President Tsai Ing-wen and her Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in January portended a broader, deeper change. Tsai openly made statements that appeared to support marriage equality during and after her campaign. In an October 2015 Facebook video posted to coincide with Taipei’s annual LGBT pride parade, Tsai exclaimed, “Everyone is equal before love.” A year later, she posted a photo on her Facebook page showing a rainbow, adding that her “belief has not changed” post-election. In August, Tsai appointed the first transgender official in government, Audrey Tang, as executive councilor for digital policy, which looked like another step toward acceptance of different gender norms.

對於許多人來說，現任總統蔡英文與其所屬政黨民主進步黨（民進黨）在一月總統大選的勝選，預告了更大幅度、更深程度的改變。無論是在選舉期間或當選後，蔡英文數次公開發表支持婚姻平權的文章。2015年10月，為響應臺北的年度同志大遊行，蔡英文的臉書發表了一支影片，影片中的蔡英文說道：「在愛之前，大家都是平等的。」一年過後，她在臉書上發佈了一則彩虹橫跨天際的照片，補充道：「雖然我的身分變了，但是我相信的價值沒有改變」，強調選後立場沒有改變。今年八月，蔡英文內閣任命首位跨性別官員唐鳳擔任政務委員，督導數位經濟與開放政府。此舉看來又是另一個接納不同性別典範的舉措。

Since Tsai took office this May, pressure has been building on her to deliver.
自蔡英文五月就任後，要求實現承諾的壓力升高

Since Tsai took office this May, pressure has been building on her to deliver. Yet she has never explicitly promised that her administration would push for same-sex marriage legislation, and critics have feared that once in office, she would find herself unable to follow through on her progressive rhetoric. The party that Tsai leads, the DPP, “has neither devoted sufficient resources to communicate the issues of marriage equality nor to reconcile differences within the party,” Victoria Hsu, who heads the nonprofit Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights (TAPCPR), told Foreign Policy.

蔡英文自今年五月就任後，要求她實現承諾的壓力不斷升高。然而，蔡英文卻從來沒有公開承諾她的行政團隊會推動婚姻平權的立法，批評者認為，一旦就任，蔡英文就無法堅持實現她過往曾發表過充滿進步性的言論。非營利組織台灣伴侶權益推動聯盟理事長許秀雯向《外交政策》表示，「蔡總統所領導的民進黨一直沒有真正投注夠多的資源在婚姻平權議題之上，或去溝通與化解黨內歧見。」

It was therefore a setback when Justice Minister Chiu Tai-san announced in August that his ministry still intended to introduce its own same-sex partnership bill — but only in 2017, after studying the impact of such a law on Taiwanese society. (In Taiwan, ministries can introduce bills into the legislature.) The effort dates back to the previous, more socially conservative Kuomintang (KMT) administration of Ma Ying-jeou and is an attempt to compromise between supporters of marriage equality and religious groups opposed. Proposing a separate law for same-sex partnership is politically easier, as it leaves the institution of marriage as currently constituted unchanged.

於是，當法務部長邱太三在八月宣布，經過研究相關法律對於台灣社會的影響，法務部仍傾向在2017年推出同性伴侶法時（台灣的行政部門可自行推出法案送進立法院審議），對於同志社群來說是一大挫敗。推行同性伴侶法可溯及較為保守的國民黨馬英九政府當權時期，用意在面對支持婚姻平權的群眾與反對婚姻平權的宗教團體中取得妥協。對於當政者而言，推動同性伴侶專法因未修改現行婚姻制度，在政治上的壓力較小。

In the absence of strong top-down leadership on the issue from Tsai, momentum for the bills currently under consideration has come from the bottom up. Audrey Ko, the chief editor of Womany, an online media outlet focused on gender issues and LGBT rights, says a stigma remains for gays and lesbians in Taiwan, one her company seeks to dispel. Other organizations, such as the Taiwan Tongzhi (LGBT) Hotline Association, perform peer counseling and advocacy work. Even corporations are chipping in; in March, McDonald’s released a commercial in which a son comes out to his father in one of its restaurants. (The father accepts it.)

缺少蔡英文「從上而下」貫徹的領導力，對於三個版本婚姻平權法案的支持聲量多來自「由下而上」的力量。關注性別與同志議題的線上媒體女人迷總編輯柯采岑表示，臺灣的同志族群還是被污名化，而女人迷就是想要破除此種污名；其他的組織例如台灣同志諮詢熱線協會則提供同志諮詢服務與倡議。企業也紛紛響應婚姻平權的議題。今年三月，在麥當勞發表的電視廣告中，有一個兒子在麥當勞向自己的父親出櫃（而父親也接受他了）。

This summer, a number of Taiwanese pop artists organized a benefit concert to raise awareness for marriage equality; tickets sold out in minutes. Pop superstar Jolin Tsai performed a lesbian-themed song for the occasion. In the music video for the song “We’re All Different, Yet the Same,” she makes the case for marriage equality by describing the plight of a woman whose partner of more than 30 years is hospitalized; the woman is unable to sign a consent form for emergency surgery because she is legally not a spouse or family member.

今年夏天，有多個臺灣流行音樂藝人組織了一場為婚姻平權而唱的公益演唱會，演唱會門票一開賣就在幾分鐘內售罄。流行樂天后蔡依林在該場演唱會中也演出以女同志為主題的歌。在她的「不一樣又怎樣」的MV中，描述了一對相守30年的女同志伴侶，其中一位因病住院，然她的伴侶卻無法在她需要進行緊急手術時簽署手術同意書，因為她的伴侶並不具有配偶或是親屬的身份。

A real-life version of this tragedy triggered public outcry and reinvigorated support for marriage equality. On Oct. 16, 67-year-old French professor Jacques Picoux fell to his death from the top of a 10-story building in Taipei, police said. He is thought to have committed suicide after depression caused by the death of his partner due to cancer; Picoux was unable to make medical decisions for his partner in his final days, as Picoux had no legal status. In a response to this outcry, legislators from the DPP and the KMT, as well as the caucus of the New Power Party (NPP), a young activist organization, all introduced similar marriage equality bills.

此種悲劇的真實案例引發了社會上強烈的抗議聲浪，推動婚姻平權運動更進一步。在今年10月16日，據警方表示，67歲的法國籍教授畢安生（Jacques Picoux）從位於台北的10樓住家一躍而下身亡。據悉，他有可能是因長期伴侶因癌症過世所引發的憂鬱症而自殺。當畢安生的伴侶在癌症末期時，因他沒有法律地位而無法替伴侶做醫療決定。為了回應關於婚姻平權的呼聲，民進黨與國民黨的立委以及由年輕的社運組織所組成的時代力量的黨團都推出了類似的婚姻平權法案。

All three proposals would amend the Taiwan Civil Code to open marriage to same-sex couples, but they differ in how to do so. DPP legislator Yu Mei-nu’s proposal introduces a general provision extending to same-sex couples the right to marriage, as well as other family law rights that accompany married status. But it leaves further gendered language across the civil code intact. The proposals of KMT legislator Hsu Yu-ren and the NPP would make references to “husband and wife” and “father and mother” gender-neutral throughout all relevant civil code provisions. These latter two proposals have great symbolic meaning, because they remove a heterosexual presumption from the code, but the legal effect is likely no different than Yu’s proposal.

這三個提案都主張修改民法將婚姻制度對同性伴侶開放，但對於如何開放則各有其詮釋。民進黨尤美女的版本採用一概括條款(註：新增民法971-1條)使同性配偶適用夫妻、父母子女等相關權利義務，但保留了民法中「性別化」的法律用語，未加修改。國民黨立委許毓仁與時代力量黨團的版本則將「夫妻」、「父母」等現行民法中的用語性別中立化。許毓仁與時代力量的版本，將異性戀預設的用語「性別中立化」而具有重大的象徵性意義，但若在法律適用結果而論，三個版本並無太大差異。

There is still a long legislative road to travel before Taiwan can become the first Asian government to legalize same-sex marriage. The bills passed their first reading on Nov. 17, but the DPP caucus whip has said the proposed bills will next be reviewed on Dec. 26. During the review process, any legislator can introduce a competing same-sex partnership act. Even if the bills were to enter a second reading, they could still face a boycott and be removed from the agenda. The bills will only become legislation after passing three readings.

臺灣要成為亞洲第一個將同性婚姻合法化的國家，仍有一大段立法之路要走。婚姻平權三版本的民法修正案都在今年11月17日通過了立法院一讀，而民進黨黨團總召表示，下一次審議的時間為12月26日。在審查過程中，任何一位立法委員都可以提出同性伴侶法作為對案。即便三個版本的婚姻平權法案進入了二讀，也還是有可能面臨杯葛而無法排進立法院的議程中。這三個版本的法案要通過三讀才有可能正式成為法律。

As these bills went through their first reading in the legislature this month, thousands of people protesting against marriage equality, and only several hundred rallying for it, gathered on Taipei’s streets.

當三個版本的法案本月在立法院通過一讀後，上千名反對婚姻平權的民眾走上台北街頭集結，當天支持婚姻平權而上街的民眾僅數百人。

As these bills went through their first reading in the legislature this month, thousands of people protesting against marriage equality, and only several hundred rallying for it, gathered on Taipei’s streets. Opposition to marriage equality in Taiwan largely comes from small but well-organized and vocal conservative religious groups. Four people reportedly even managed to storm into the legislative meeting room, shouting that the “legislators are monsters” and would want to change Taiwan “into an AIDS island.”

這三個版本的法案本月都在立法院通過一讀，為此，上千名反對婚姻平權的民眾走上台北街頭集結，然當天上街支持婚姻平權的民眾卻只有數百人。在台灣，大部分反對婚姻平權的民眾來自規模小但組織嚴密且發言聲量大的保守宗教團體。據報載，甚至有四名反對修法的民眾嘗試要衝進立法院司法及法制委員會的會議室，高喊著：「立委都是怪獸」、台灣要變「愛滋島」。

It is hard to tell whether the legislature will pass a same-sex marriage bill this time, says Hsu of TAPCPR, partly because of internal opposition within the DPP and KMT. (The NPP caucus fully supports its bill but only holds five seats in legislature.) Tsai has reiterated that the bills are “clear evidence” marriage equality has support across all parties. But even Yu, who introduced the DPP bill, says she is only cautiously optimistic about the chances of passing a marriage equality law.

台灣伴侶權益推動聯盟理事長許秀雯表示，現在沒有辦法預知立法院是否會通過婚姻平權法案，情勢走向如何，真的很難說。因為主要政黨國民黨及民進黨的立委雖然都有提出婚姻平權民法修正案，但這兩個黨裡面也都有反對者（時代力量雖然全黨都支持婚姻平權，在立法院內也只有五個席次）。蔡英文總統數度表示，不同版本婚姻平權法案的推出，即為此議題獲得跨黨派支持的「明證」。然而，即便是推出民進黨版本婚姻平權法案的尤美女立委也表示，對於婚姻平權是否能過關成為法律，她仍只抱持審慎樂觀的態度。

Outside lawmakers’ offices, the battle for public support continues. If anything, it seems to be waning precisely at the time when it will be most needed. “More and more people are confessing that they love gays but that they don’t support same-sex marriage,” said Ko, because they believe allowing same-sex partners to get married will harm traditional family values. She is therefore unsure whether Taiwan will manage to pass a bill in the next year. At least, Ko added, “people are talking [about it], and it is not a taboo anymore.”

在立法委員的辦公室外，爭取民意支持的戰爭仍未停歇。若真要說，此時此刻婚姻平權運動最需要的是什麼？大概就是更多的支持。女人迷總編輯柯采岑表示，「有越來越多人坦白表示，他們愛同志但是不支持婚姻平權」，因為他們認為，若同性伴侶可以結婚，將損害傳統家庭價值。」她也說，不確定臺灣能否在明年內通過婚姻平權法案。她補充：「但至少，大家都開始討論（婚姻平權法案）了，這再也不是禁忌了。」