│ 嚴格的英國食品衛生標準 │
英國的食安標準一直在世界是著了名的嚴苛,這點從很多生活中的小細節可以看出來,常見的綠黑色 5 分制食品衛生分級標籤(Food hygiene ratings)就是很好的例子。
無論是餐廳門口或是外送 app 的餐廳頁面裡,都很常有這項評比公告,這是由地方政府的食品衛生專員定期抽查檢驗的結果。
認識了家裡開餐廳的 A 先生後,我才開始注意到這個評分的重要性。一來是 A 先生在廚房長大,知道許多我們外人不知道的廚房內幕眉角,二來是我一開始來英國點外送,有好幾次吃完飯都拉肚子,有一次還食物中毒,起初以為是自己腸胃虛弱,後來才知道可以上網檢舉跟投訴這樣的不衛生餐廳。
這個分級制度分為 0 - 5 分,依我自己的標準來說,我沒辦法接受 3 分以下的店家,平常點外賣也會注意對方是不是太 lah-sap。這項評分檢驗的調查項目主要有五大項:
- 如何處理食物 handling of food
- 如何儲存食物 how food is stored
- 如何烹煮食物 how food is prepared
- 店內設備的清潔 cleanliness of facilities
- 食品安全的管理 how food safety is managed
舉個例子吧,通常有供應蛋料理的餐廳,當天營業前會一次將好幾十顆蛋打在一個大容器裡,需要時就舀出來用,打烊後再把整個容器放回冰箱,隔天繼續打新的蛋進去。問題來了,如果餐廳不注重食品安全、容器上也沒有標示日期,你今天吃到的一份番茄炒蛋有可能是一週前沉在那個容器底部的舊蛋液。
或者,依照正常的廚房食安標準,生肉與熟食必須使用不同的砧板,生肉也必須封存在容器裡放在冰箱冷藏室的最底層,避免與其他食物交叉污染。
又或者,肉類一旦從冷凍櫃取出解凍後,就不能再放回去冷凍,以免細菌滋生。
很多這些小細節都是檢查員會評比餐廳的重點,這些我們在家裡的廚房都會留意的項目,可能對很多愛偷懶的餐廳來說是能省則省的投機取巧,如果不幸吃到了這類無良店家所端出來的料理,只求自己的腸胃夠強壯了。這時候這個食品衛生分級就是很好的指標。
除了外出用餐可以留意一下餐廳大門貼的告示(顏色跟 TripAdvisor 有點像哈要區分一下),我通常如果用外送平台點餐,也會特地用篩選功能選出 Hygiene rating 在 3 分以上的(下面截圖附上英國常見外送 app 哪裡找得到衛生評分)。
2020 對餐飲業來說風景慘淡無光,但如果連最基本的食品衛生都做不到,我想也沒有生存下去的必要了,趁著這波疫情大家瘋狂點外送的期間,大家也可以試著找到自己滿意、又衛生美味的外賣。
同時也有10000部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル,也在其Youtube影片中提到,...
「food hygiene rating」的推薦目錄:
- 關於food hygiene rating 在 倫敦男子日常 london.nanzhi Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於food hygiene rating 在 潮媽與溱溱 ๑OㅂO๑ Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於food hygiene rating 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於food hygiene rating 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於food hygiene rating 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於food hygiene rating 在 Food Hygiene Rating Scheme: Are English Consumers Safe? 的評價
food hygiene rating 在 潮媽與溱溱 ๑OㅂO๑ Facebook 的最佳貼文
這些才是真正的香港人💪🏻 ❤️
加油啊!💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻
😭好感動🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
「雲海突發消息」
繼琴晚有三百幾個公務員EO向政府公開聲明之後,簡直陸續有嚟!今朝到我出手啦!話說琴晚深夜有在職公務員主動聯絡我,表示佢哋聯繫左超過44個部門同事、超過230位公務員、不單只EO而是跨職級,由文書助理到行政主任AO等等,向現在香港政府及林鄭特首發出嚴厲聲明,不滿現在特區政府處理事件手法及態度,強烈要求特首回應市民!佢哋希望我代表佢哋發放呢封信件以及向香港外國傳媒發放呢個信件!我當然應承啦!因為我覺得整件事好有「象徵意義 」,非常symbolic!一個過去20幾年專門對付政府專門投訴政府部門嘅投訴達人,今時今日竟然我哋係企埋同一陣線,由我代佢哋轉達及公開發放呢封信件!簡直就係香港歷史破天荒!以下係其中相關資料:
「聯署經核實為44個決策局/部門/單位, 共235位政府人員職員身份證明」
以下係這封235位公務員嘅聯署中英文聲明信:
「致特別行政區首長林鄭月娥女士公開信
致香港特別行政區首長林鄭月娥女士、行政會議成員、各位司長、局長及立法會議員
作為香港公務員的一份子,我們一直默默耕耘,為社會及香港市民提供優質服務,並堅守一貫的中立態 度,支持著政府各部門的良好運作,這是我們一直引以自豪的工作,亦是身為香港人的一份驕傲。 過 去的兩個月,香港人參與了一連串反對修例的遊行集會,數以百萬計的市民站出來表達訴求,守護香 港,體現對香港的愛護和關心。可惜,政府一直依然故我,拒絕耹聽大眾的聲音,違背服務市民的承 諾。
7月21日晚上在元朗有大批白衣暴徒襲擊市民,以武器攻擊路經群眾甚至記者,令無辜市民受傷,令人 髮指。雖然當晚有大批市民報警求助,但警方未有及時派員到場保護市民及捉拿暴徒,令人對警方執法 能力存疑,有負市民期望。其做法令人懷疑政黑勾結,除了令市民對警隊信心盡失外,亦令公務員質疑 政府機構並非為民服務,更甚者令公務員成為社會撕裂的幫兇。
當社會上大多數人認為政府決策出現問題,我們身為公僕理應適切回應人民訴求。我們今天決定打破沉 默,站出來強烈要求政府直接面對民意。
我們強烈要求政府回應民間的五大訴求,即(一)完全撤回逃犯條例修訂、(二)追究警察開槍鎮壓、 (三)不檢控和釋放反對逃犯條例修訂的示威者、(四)撤銷定性6月12日集會為暴動、(五)促請林 鄭月娥、鄭若驊、李家超及盧偉聰等官員問責下台,並要求成立由大法官主持,有廣泛公信力的獨立調 查委員會,調查警方處理自6月9日以來的衝突手法及盡快履行基本法所賦予香港市民的雙普選權利,使 香港成為一個真正自由、民主的社會。
我們以七月二十四日拍攝的職員證明文件為憑, 收集了覆蓋政府大部分不同部門的員工強而有力的控 訴, 強烈要求當權者直接面對民意。
如政府繼續漠視民意,我們將籌備具體工業行動,謙卑地與廣大香港的市民同行,克盡我們服務市民的 「公僕」身份。
一群來自以下不同部門的公務員敬上
漁農自然護理署
建築署
屋宇署
民眾安全服務隊
民航處
公司註冊處
香港海關
衛生署
律政司
渠務署
教育局
機電工程署
環境保護署
香港消防處
食物及環境衛生署
食物及衛生局 香港司機職工總會 政府產業署 路政署 民政事務局 民政事務處 香港房屋委員會 警務處(文職) 香港郵政 入境事務處 稅務局 創新科技署 知識產權署 司法機構
勞工處
土地註冊處
地政總署 康樂及文化事務署 通訊事務管理局辦公室 政府資訊科技總監辦公室 公共衛生檢測中心 (衛生署) 香港電台
差餉物業估價署
選舉事務處
社會福利署
工業貿易署
庫務署
水務署
在職家庭及學生資助事務處
(共44個決策局/部門/單位, 共235位政府人員職員身份證明) (鳴謝 BeWater HK, 翻譯組)
25/07/2019 ####### (English version)
Dear Chief Executive of the HKSAR Mrs Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor, members of the Executive Committee, Secretaries of Departments and Bureaux and Members of Legislative Council,
As members of the civil servants of Hong Kong, we have been working incessantly over the years to offer our citizens with quality service and take a neutral stance that supports the government departments for their smooth operations. We are always proud of our jobs and being citizens of Hong Kong.
For the past two months, Hong Kong people have participated in a series of marches and rallies. Millions of citizens have expressed their demands, showed their concern and caring for protecting their beloved Hong Kong. Unfortunately, the Government has refused to listen to the public and remained its own way of act, violating its compromise to serve the citizens.
In the evening of 21 of July, there was a large group of rioters in white shirt attacking citizens in Yuen Long; they used weapons to attack protestors returning home, journalists, and even bystanders, causing innocent citizens injured, making one's hair stand up in anger. Although many calls were made to the police, they had not sent force in time to protect those citizens and arrested the rioters in time, which made people have doubts whether the police had the ability to enforce the law. Their failure in enforcing the law had disappointed citizens and people worldwide. The police’s lack of response
on July 21 had made people suspect the government colluding with triads. This had not only caused citizens to lose confidence in the police, but also made civil servants suspect that the government departments are not aimed to serve citizens faithfully and are making civil servants accomplices tearing apart the society.
When the majority in the society disagrees with the policy made by our government, being civil servants, we should respond to public’s demands reasonably. Today we decided to break our silence, to strongly urge the government to respond to those demands.
We strongly demand the Government to respond to the five major appeals of the society, i.e., (1) withdraw completely the Extradition Law Amendment Bill, (2) pursue the responsibility of the Police Force for firing armaments and their suppression, (3) stop all prosecutions and release the protestors, (4) retract the characterization of the assembly on 12 June as a riot, (5) step down and fulfill the pledge of accountability by government officials including Chief Executive Carrie Lam, Secretary of Justice Teresa Cheng, Secretary of Security John Lee, Commissioner of Police Stephen Lo. Furthermore, we demand the establishment of highly credible Independent Probe held by chief judges, to investigate into the way the police dealt with the clashes with protestors since 9 of June and to honour the commitment of the Basic Law to grant all citizens of Hong Kong the right to dual universal suffrage, so to make Hong Kong become truly free and democratic society.
The evidence we shown here are photos taken on 24/7. They show different staff ID cards collected from most of the departments under the Hong Kong government, representing their request to the potentate: "Response to the will of the people directly”.
If the Government continues to ignore public opinion, we will organise concrete industrial actions, so that we could humbly join hands with the community at large and fulfill our responsibility as servants of our fellow citizens.
Yours truly,
A group of civil servants from the following departments and bureaux:
Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department Architectural Services Department
Buildings Department
Civil Aid Service
Civil Aviation Department Companies Registry
Customs and Excise Department Department of Health Department of Justice Drainage Service Department Education Bureau
Electrical and Mechanical Service Department Environmental Protection Department
Fire Service Department
Food and Environmental Hygiene Department Food and Health Bureau
Government Drivers Union Government Property Agency Highways Department
Home Affairs Bureau
Home Affairs Department
Hong Kong Housing Authority
Hong Kong Police Force (Civilian Staff)
Hongkong Post
Immigration Department
Inland Revenue Department
Innovation and Technology Commission
Intellectual Property Department
Judiciary
Labour Department
Land Registry
Lands Department
Leisure and Cultural Services Department
Office of the Communications Authority
Office of the Government Chief Information Officer
Public Health Laboratory Centre (Department of Health) Radio Television Hong Kong
Rating and Valuation Department
Registration and Electoral Office
Social Welfare Department
Trade and Industry Department
Treasury
Water Supplies Department
Working Family and Student Financial Assistance Agency
25/7/2019
(Totally 44 Bureau/Departments/Units,235 numbers of proof of identity as Government staff) (Credits to BeWater HK, Translation Unit)
Last modified: 9:05 am」
Ps若果有網媒想轉述,無任歡迎!想搵呢次聲明信件相關公務員訪問可私底下聯絡我!
公務員加油!we connect this time!
food hygiene rating 在 Food Hygiene Rating Scheme: Are English Consumers Safe? 的推薦與評價
What is the Food Hygiene Rating Scheme and why do only certain places display a food hygiene rating ? Well, they ALL have one, ... ... <看更多>