#女性參政的世代對談及前行
昨天晚上,很榮幸受到女書店的邀請,能夠主持「2021 眾女成城:世代對談」系列座談會的第一場「婦運與民主政治的交會:跨世代女性公共事務參與」。
這個場次名副其實邀請了4位 #跨世代女性參政者 對話交流:
#李元貞
#成令方教授X台灣基進
張淑惠-歐巴桑來了(歐巴桑聯盟)
苗博雅 MiaoPoya
大家的參與前後跨越近四十年,見證台灣女性參政歷程並實踐其中。整個座談會實在是太精彩了,感謝兩三百位與會者一起渡過了精彩的150分鐘。
#婦女運動在台灣民主化進程中的重要影響
現在的年輕人可能對「性平運動」比較認識,但其實台灣發展性別平等,是從婦運開始的。
這場座談會世代傳承的意義格外重要,關心性別議題的各世代,可以直接由運動者的分享,了解婦運在台灣民主化過程中所扮演的重要角色,包含台灣成為 #亞州最性別平等國家 的歷程。
#女性參政所帶來的改變與意義
今天座談會主題是「跨世代女性公共事務參與」,「參政」只是其中一種實踐路徑。
女性參政不是只為了女人要平等的權利,而是一個女性邁向平權的象徵與過程。如果性別真的已經很平等,以佔據人口一半來看,應該要有一半的決策者是女性,但實際並沒有。
此外,女人參與公共事務,也會改變政治的結果。許多研究都看到,女性參與公共事務會讓公共政策不一樣;因為女性會更關心和家庭相關的公共政策與下一代,例如托育、健康、照顧和教育。
#四起女性參政的重要事件
台灣在女性參政上有許多重要的事件,以下列舉我自己最熟悉的4起事件作為分享:
1️⃣1996年,彭婉如女士擔任婦女發展部主任時,成功推動「婦女參政四分之一保障條款」,要求民進黨內各類公職選舉提名,保障女性名額佔1/4,這是歷史性的突破。
2️⃣2000年,當時婦女團體遊說了所有總統候選人承諾,當選後,女性內閣比例要1/4。陳水扁當選總統後,女性內閣比例21.4%,是首次台灣內閣女性超過20%(42位中有9位是女性)。
3️⃣2005年,修憲的關鍵突破之一是「不分區立委中必須要有一半的婦女保障名額」,這件事我自己有親身參與推動。
當時,立委要從「複數選區」改為「單一選區兩票制」,我們提出實證研究,說明單一選區對於女性不利,所以做出要求, #成功獲得跨黨派支持。
這個關鍵改變,保障了全國113位立委中,即使區域立委皆無女性當選,至少還有17位女性能擔任不分區立委,佔整體的15%。
也因此,愈來愈多女性的努力與傑出表現 #能被看見(之前是連機會都沒有);連帶影響更多女性能夠進入國會,到我們這屆女性立委比例已突破4成,不只是有史以來最高,也是亞洲之冠。
4️⃣2016年,社會民主黨提名的區域立委,候選人中6位中有5位是女性,只有1位是男性,女性佔83%。
當時還有人質疑說:女性候選人這麼多,社民黨是不是厭男?但反過來,過往常見許多候選人提名多為男性時,卻鮮少遭受質疑。
#女性參政還要更往前
過去,婦女運動為台灣女性參政打下重要基礎。現在,我們還可以做更多,為下一個世代創造更加性別平等的公共參與環境。
我在立法院,有兩個相關的修法提案:
🍀 內閣單一性別比例不得低於三分之一的修法草案:
台灣在2007年就簽署 #消除對婦女一切形式歧視公約(CEDAW公約),其中第23號一般性建議便指出,女性參與政治和公共生活的比例應達30%至35%。
我已提出「行政院組織法增訂第十二條之一條文草案」,希望台灣的內閣比例,#任一性別不得低於1/3,本草案已於去年9月一讀通過。
🍀 政黨補助款5%培育多元人才參政的政黨法修法草案:
促進女性參政已是國際潮流。以韓國為例,2004年起,政府對各政黨所補助的經常費之10%必須用來促進婦女參政,約占政黨補助款總額的2.5%。
台灣應參考南韓培育女性參政之作法,培育多元族群(含女性)參政人才制度性的財源應更加擴大。因此我將提案,建議「多元參政人才培育」費用比例,應占政黨補助款總額的5%。
#座談會精彩分享摘要
昨天4位重量級與談人以及1位神秘嘉賓的精彩分享及回應,我就自己印象最深的點盡量摘要,希望能為這場豐富座談留下一些紀錄,也跟大家分享:
🙋♀李元貞
1982年婦女新知雜誌創辦人/台灣婦運先驅/淡大中文系榮譽教授/《眾女成城》作者
20世紀70年代,台灣民主運動興盛,人權觀念開始被提出,但當時很少討論兩性平等,也缺少對於婦女議題的重視。
所以我和好幾個婦運夥伴就在80年代婦女新知基金會知基金會,把全台各方面的婦女議題,包含兩性平權、女性各類議題(婚姻、家庭、就業、參政等),一方面研究,一方面提出主張及批判,讓社會能夠看見。
我在威權時代做婦運時,常常被人家罵說:「你那什麼問題啊?!女人都已經有婦女節了,台灣哪裡有什麼兩性不平等?!」等話語。
也因為我離婚,所以那時大家就說:「元貞就是因為離婚,心理有問題,一天到晚要講兩性平等。」
當時的我面對人家這樣說,就覺得更要去提兩性平權;當人家說婦女哪有什麼情慾好談時,我就更要去談。
婦運的努力從早期,一直到後來好多婦女團體紛紛成立,推廣各種不同面向的婦女議題,真的愈來愈好。
當然推動過程中,也有很多的競爭與辯論,例如早期提出的婦女就業較無爭議,後來情慾部分的爭議就比較多。但整體來說,現在整個社會對女性權益愈加關注與提升,尤其是年輕人,對此我相當開心。
🙋♀ #成令方教授X台灣基進
2001年創立高雄醫學大學性別研究所/2018年教授退休/2020代表台灣基進參選不分區立委/現任台灣基進黨 性別發展部 顧問
今天的主題「眾女成城」雖然是「女」性為主,但這之中也有男性的參與。
元貞寫的《眾女成城》這本書中就有提到,早期消基會的創辦人之一柴松林,每次婦女運動時,他就是一個白髮蒼蒼的男人站在一群女性中,跟大家一起遊行與支持。
有人會說你們都不包括男人,我覺得不是,重點是以女性為主體,任何支持性別平等的男性,也都會是我們的好夥伴。
談到女性的參與,公共事務的認定應該要很寬廣,我們的發言、開會、上街遊行、課堂教學、在外演講或寫書等,這些都是公共事務;我們不應該只將參選和擔任公職當成參與公共事務。
例如當時劉毓秀堅持要從母姓,這個行動和發言就改變了大家的思考,去反思為什麼姓一定要用父親的姓?為什麼不能用母親的姓?
另外,我自己的親身經驗是,1983年的暑假,我和婦女新知的夥伴聚在一起,大家開會討論 sexual harassment 這詞要怎麼翻譯?後來決定要翻成「性騷擾」;隔年,華航空服員做身體檢查時遭到醫師性騷擾,這個詞就開始有意義、成了公共議題。
🙋♀ 張淑惠-歐巴桑來了(歐巴桑聯盟)
小民參政歐巴桑聯盟黨召集人/台灣親子共學教育促進會創會理事長
為什麼歐巴桑會參選?一個是身為小民的不服氣,另一個是做為一位女性的不服氣。
不久前富比世雜誌指出,女性在領導國家時,比較具有公開透明、當機立斷、富同情心、鼓勵對話與交流等特質,也使得許多國家遠離新冠肺炎的疫情威脅。
我們很希望女性能夠帶進不同的政治文化,因為父權文化其實影響我們生活各個層面,也影響了政治的場域,比方說逞凶好鬥真的是唯一的樣子嗎?
2018年時南部還有男性議員的候選人,看板設計是把自己和金正恩的照片併在一起,然後下標說:敢說敢做敢爭取。
但其實民意代表不只是爭取福利,更是要喚起民眾的參與才對。且這個照片雖然下面寫了「傾聽民意」,但金正恩這個人物本身就和民意有所衝突。
當然,我們也不能認同女性候選人穿著結婚禮服下標說要嫁入議會。
我們的參選是希望創造一個新的文化,包含女性帶來新的政治文化、更多的對話、溝通、同理.以及讓這個政治不是一個金錢的競賽。推動參政平權,支持更多女性和一般的小民能夠進入政治場域來為大家的生活帶來改善。
🙋♀ 苗博雅 MiaoPoya
台北市議員
我自己剛好是在解嚴的1987年出生,我等於是大家努力奮鬥下的受益者,如果沒有先前二、三十年大家努力做的倡議和教育,今天台灣是不會進入到讓像我這樣子的一個人選上議員的時代。
過去二、三十年,大家一起努力做到了一件工作,就是台灣性別平等法制工程其實是做得相當好。
尤其是我有時候跟其他亞洲國家,例如香港和日本的朋友經驗交流時,他們常提到台灣有一些在亞洲相當亮眼的數字,比如說女性國會立委的比例、女性政治人物的比例、婦女的就業率及勞動參與率等等,他們常問說到底台灣做什麼麼才有今天的成果?
我認為過去大家努力推動各種法律制度,顯著提升婦女與各種性少數、LGBT族群的法律地位以及國家公權力的保障,這點非常重要。
包含《性別平等教育法》、《性別工作平等法》、《性騷擾防治法》、《性侵害防治法》等等,正因為台灣有這些相對完整的法律保障,讓我們的婦女不管是在職場、家庭,或我們現在不斷培育出新一代的青少年在學校內,都可以得到更多的保障,更自由地發展自我。
🙋神秘嘉賓 ♀彭渰雯
中山大學公共事務管理研究所教授/高雄市婦女新知協會理事長
從現任各級民選政治人物的女性比例:
總統100%
立委41.6%
縣市長31.8%
縣市議員33.7%
村里長16.6%
就可以看到,和我們很驕傲的立委及縣市議員女性比例相比,女性村里長的比例相對很低;且在我們推女里長運動前,更只有13.9%。
保障名額帶來了正面的效應,讓許多女性的亮麗表現被看見,讓愈來愈多女性被提名;但在保障名額制度無法執行的村里長層面,則必須要婦運的陪伴與支持。
2016年的資料顯示,社區女性志工的比例有69%;但女性村里長只有14%、女性社區協會理事長只有19.3%,都不到1/5,這是一個不合理的現況,必須要系統性的改變。
--------
以上是 女書店「2021 眾女成城:世代對談」系列的首場摘要分享,接下來還有6場次。
下一場接棒的是10/8(五)晚上,由紀惠容監委所主持的「女性身體自主權與社會保護機制」,相信精彩可期,請大家持續關注女書店臉書,報名參加!
婦女運動四十年的歷史,讓我們看到,改變是可能的!
我也會在國會繼續推動修法與政策監督,讓台灣成為一個讓所有人不分性別與認同,都能平等自在生活的地方!
同時也有10000部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル,也在其Youtube影片中提到,...
「harassment中文」的推薦目錄:
- 關於harassment中文 在 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於harassment中文 在 賓狗單字 Bingo Bilingual Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於harassment中文 在 黃之鋒 Joshua Wong Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於harassment中文 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於harassment中文 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於harassment中文 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於harassment中文 在 Community Guidelines strike basics - YouTube Help 的評價
harassment中文 在 賓狗單字 Bingo Bilingual Facebook 的最佳貼文
記得追蹤 @bingobilingual_bb ,一起聽新聞學英文喔!
【sexual harassment 性騷擾】- 名詞
Cheng accused a male singer of sexual harassment.
雞排妹鄭家純指控一名男歌手,對其性騷擾。
第二則新聞,是雞排妹性騷擾風暴,最近鬧很大。簡單來說,雞排妹在一個公司的尾牙場表演,後來她指控台語男歌手翁立友性騷擾。後來,雞排妹開記者會落淚描述過程、翁立友也開記者反擊,說自己沒有性騷擾雞排妹,他是被誣賴的。
這真的就是性騷擾案件複雜的地方,因為很難找到證據嘛!所以,這集不談這件事是真是假。哪要談什麼呢?有些人攻擊雞排妹,說她根本就是「人帥真好、人醜性騷擾」。
這句話的意思就是說,如果是帥哥偷摸我,我就很高興,醜男偷摸我,我就大叫「噁心!性騷擾!」。「人帥真好、人醜性騷擾」這句話,原本,或許是一種大男人沙文主義、故意貶低的攻擊,但我覺得,這個攻擊,很弱!非常弱耶 XD 因為這句話,「人帥真好、人醜性騷擾」,對我來說,也算對了一半 XDD
這是因為,啊性騷擾的關鍵,本來就是合不合意嘛!我覺得你帥,而且樂意讓你摸,這就是調情,我覺得你不是我的菜,不同意你摸,啊你還摸,就是性騷擾。哪裡有錯了奇怪。
所以下次有人在網路上罵「人帥真好、人醜性騷擾」,記得回他,「沒錯,合意就是調情、不合意就是性騷擾,謝謝你對女性的支持」XD
雞排妹控訴男歌手性騷擾,性騷擾就是 sexual harassment、sexual harassment。sexual 是性相關的,harassment 是騷擾,性相關的騷擾,就是性騷擾 sexual harassment。
#雞排妹 #性騷擾 #英文 #怎麼說 #英文單字 #英文學習 #英文筆記 #職場 #職場英文 #學英文 #podcast #播客 #中文播客 #podcasttaiwan #中文podcast #人帥真好 #人帥真好人醜性騷擾 #翁立友 #鄭家純 #英語
harassment中文 在 黃之鋒 Joshua Wong Facebook 的最讚貼文
【Joshua Wong speaking to the Italian Senate】#意大利國會研討會演說 —— 呼籲世界在大學保衛戰一週年後與香港人站在同一陣線
中文、意大利文演說全文:https://www.patreon.com/posts/44167118
感謝開創未來基金會(Fondazione Farefuturo)邀請,讓我透過視像方式在意大利國會裡舉辦的研討會發言,呼籲世界繼續關注香港,與香港人站在同一陣線。
意大利作為絕無僅有參與一帶一路發展的國家,理應對中共打壓有更全面的理解,如今正值大學保衛戰一週年,以致大搜捕的時刻,當打壓更為嚴峻,香港更需要世界與我們同行。
為了讓各地朋友也能更了解香港狀況,我已在Patreon發佈當天演說的中文、英文和意大利文發言稿,盼望在如此困難的時勢裡,繼續讓世界知道我們未曾心息的反抗意志。
【The Value of Freedom: Burning Questions for Hong Kongers】
Good morning. I have the privilege today to share some of my thoughts and reflections about freedom, after taking part in social activism for eight years in Hong Kong. A movement calling for the withdrawal of the extradition law starting from last year had escalated into a demand for democracy and freedom. This city used to be prestigious for being the world’s most liberal economy, but now the infamous authoritarian government took away our freedom to election, freedom of assembly, freedom of expression and ideas.
Sometimes, we cannot avoid questioning the cause we are fighting for, the value of freedom. Despite a rather bleak prospect, why do we have to continue in this struggle? Why do we have to cherish freedom? What can we do to safeguard freedom at home and stay alert to attacks on freedom? In answering these questions, I hope to walk through three episodes in the previous year.
Turning to 2020, protests are not seen as frequently as they used to be on the media lens, partly because of the pandemic, but more importantly for the authoritarian rule. While the world is busy fighting the pandemic, our government took advantage of the virus to exert a tighter grip over our freedom. Putting the emergency laws in place, public assemblies in Hong Kong were banned. Most recently, a rally to support press freedom organized by journalists was also forbidden. While many people may ask if it is the end of street activism, ahead of us in the fight for freedom is another battleground: the court and the prison.
Freedom Fighters in Courtrooms and in Jail
Part of the huge cost incurred in the fight for freedom and democracy in Hong Kong is the increasing judicial casualties. As of today, more than 10 thousand people have been arrested since the movement broke out, more than a hundred of them are already locked up in prison. Among the 2,300 protestors who are prosecuted, 700 of them may be sentenced up to ten years for rioting charges.
Putting these figures into context, I wish to tell you what life is like, as a youngster in today’s Hong Kong. I was humbled by a lot of younger protestors and students whose exceptional maturity are demonstrated in courtrooms and in prison. What is thought to be normal university life is completely out of the question because very likely the neighbour next door or the roommate who cooked you lunch today will be thrown to jail on the next.
I do prison visits a few times a month to talk to activists who are facing criminal charges or serving sentences for their involvement in the movement. It is not just a routine of my political work, but it becomes my life as an activist. Since the movement, prison visits has also become the daily lives of many families.
But it is always an unpleasant experience passing through the iron gates one after one to enter the visitors’ room, speaking to someone who is deprived of liberty, for a selflessly noble cause. As an activist serving three brief jail terms, I understand that the banality of the four walls is not the most difficult to endure in jail. What is more unbearable is the control of thought and ideas in every single part of our daily routine enforced by the prison system. It will diminish your ability to think critically and the worst of it will persuade you to give up on what you are fighting for, if you have not prepared it well. Three years ago when I wrote on the first page of prison letters, which later turned into a publication called the ‘Unfree Speech’, I was alarmed at the environment of the prison cell. Those letters were written in a state in which freedom was deprived of and in which censorship was obvious. It brings us to question ourselves: other than physical constraints like prison bars, what makes us continue in the fight for freedom and democracy?
Mutual Support to activists behind-the-scene
The support for this movement is undiminished over these 17 months. There are many beautiful parts in the movement that continue to revitalise the ways we contribute to this city, instead of making money on our own in the so-called global financial centre. In particular, it is the fraternity, the mutual assistance among protestors that I cherished the most.
As more protestors are arrested, people offer help and assistance wholeheartedly -- we sit in court hearings even if we don’t know each other, and do frequent prison visits and write letters to protesters in detention. In major festivals and holidays, people gathered outside the prison to chant slogans so that they won’t feel alone and disconnected. This is the most touching part to me for I also experienced life in jail.
The cohesion, the connection and bonding among protestors are the cornerstone to the movement. At the same time, these virtues gave so much empowerment to the mass public who might not be able to fight bravely in the escalating protests. These scenes are not able to be captured by cameras, but I’m sure it is some of the most important parts of Hong Kong’s movement that I hope the world will remember.
I believe this mutual support transcends nationality or territory because the value of freedom does not alter in different places. More recently, Twelve Hongkong activists, all involved in the movement last year, were kidnapped by China’s coastal guard when fleeing to Taiwan for political refugee in late-August. All of them are now detained secretly in China, with the youngest aged only 16. We suspect they are under torture during detention and we call for help on the international level, putting up #SAVE12 campaign on twitter. In fact, how surprising it is to see people all over the world standing with the dozen detained protestors for the same cause. I’m moved by activists in Italy, who barely knew these Hong Kong activists, even took part in a hunger strike last month calling for immediate release of them. This form of interconnectivity keeps us in spirit and to continue our struggle to freedom and democracy.
Understanding Value of freedom in the university battle
A year ago on this day, Hong Kong was embroiled in burning clashes as the police besieged the Polytechnic University. It was a day we will not forget and this wound is still bleeding in the hearts of many Hong Kongers. A journalist stationed in the university at that time once told me that being at the scene could only remind him of the Tiananmen Square Massacre 31 years ago in Beijing. There was basically no exit except going for the dangerous sewage drains.
That day, thousands of people, old or young, flocked to districts close to the university before dawn, trying to rescue protestors trapped inside the campus. The reinforcements faced grave danger too, for police raided every corner of the small streets and alleys, arresting a lot of them. Among the 800+ arrested on a single day, 213 people were charged with rioting. For sure these people know there will be repercussions. It is the conscience driving them to take to the streets regardless of the danger, the conscience that we should stand up to brutality and authoritarianism, and ultimately to fight for freedoms that are guaranteed in our constitution. As my dear friend, Brian Leung once said, ‘’Hong Kong Belongs to Everyone Who Shares Its Pain’’. I believe the value of freedom is exemplified through our compassion to whom we love, so much that we are willing to sacrifice the freedom of our own.
Defending freedom behind the bars
No doubt there is a terrible price to pay in standing up to the Beijing and Hong Kong government. But after serving a few brief jail sentences and facing the continuing threat of harassment, I learnt to cherish the freedom I have for now, and I shall devote every bit what I have to strive for the freedom of those who have been ruthlessly denied.
The three episodes I shared with you today -- the courtroom, visiting prisoners and the battle of university continue to remind me of the fact that the fight for freedom has not ended yet. In the coming months, I will be facing a maximum of 5 years in jail for unauthorized assembly and up to one ridiculous year for wearing a mask in protest. But prison bars would never stop me from activism and thinking critically.
I only wish that during my absence, you can continue to stand with the people of Hong Kong, by following closely to the development, no matter the ill-fated election, the large-scale arrest under National Security Law or the twelve activists in China. To defy the greatest human rights abusers is the essential way to restore democracy of our generation, and the generation following us.
.................
💪小額支持我的獨家分析及文章:https://bit.ly/joshuawonghk
╭────────────────╮
╞🌐https://twitter.com/joshuawongcf
╞📷https://www.instagram.com/joshua1013
╞📧joshua@joshuawongcf.com
╞💬https://t.me/joshuawonghk
╰────────────────╯
harassment中文 在 Community Guidelines strike basics - YouTube Help 的推薦與評價
We'll also tell you: What content was removed; Which policies it violated (for example harassment or violence); How it affects your channel; What you can do ... ... <看更多>