關於 involve參與 ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

【輕輕鬆鬆一分鐘⋯⋯扮露營】

⭐疫情下衍生的無聊玩意
⭐小朋友一向都鍾意在家中扮露營
#星期日輕輕鬆鬆一分鐘

因為疫情關係，政府管理的露營場地暫不開放，露營地點選擇減少，何不來個「家居露營」？在客廳紮營，用簡單的工具煮食，在居家抗疫生活找點小樂趣。如果小朋友也參與的話，自理能力或許會因而提升呢！

【Relax for a minute…… Pretend to go camping】

Due to the pandemic, the government has temporarily closed many public campsites. Why not start a pretend play at home? It would be fun to set up a tent in the living room and prepare some simple dishes. You can even involve your children and use this as an opportunity to help them improve their self-management skills!

Comment below or like 👍🏻 this post to support us. ❤️ Follow us for more healthy living tips.

#男 #女 #露營

（轉）

*【就特區政府引用國安法第22條展開大規模拘捕行動的聲明】*

超過50名民主派議員、社運人士及律師，因組織及／或參與已延期的2020年立法會換屆選舉前的初選，而被指控觸犯國家安全法第22條下，有關顛覆罪的罪行。我們 － 即下列堅定相信基本法和法治的聯署人 － 以個人名義，對上述事宜表達深切關注。

在星期三(6日)的記者會上，警務處國家安全處高級警司李桂華證實，警方在是次行動中，在獲得搜查令的情況下搜查了72個處所，當中包括一間律師事務所。國安法第22條訂明，構成罪行的基本元素是「以武力、威脅使用武力或者其他非法手段」。然而當局在記者會上未能完滿地解釋，在該次初選並沒有出現任何暴力或非法行為的情況下，他們是基於甚麼原因引用第22條採取拘捕行動。

任何人不論政見均有權參與公共事務，是《公民與政治權利國際公約》第25條確保的權利，亦受《香港人權法案條例》第21條保護。這項權利，對發展民主管治和法治均發揮關鍵的作用。因此，我們強烈譴責任何打壓和平表達《基本法》賦予市民的基本人權的行為。

《約翰奈斯堡關於國家安全、言論自由和獲取信息自由原則》(U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/1996/39) 第二條訂明：「一種以國家安全為理由所實行的限制是不合法的，除非其真正的目的和可以 證實的效果是為了保護國家的生存或領土完整免遭武力或武力威脅的侵害， 或者保護其對武力或武力威脅反應的能力，無論這些武力或武力威脅來自外 部，如軍事威脅，還是來自內部，如煽動以暴力推翻政府。」2003年3月，特區政府嘗試按照《基本法》第23條制訂國家安全法時，當時的保安局仍然正面地肯定國家安全立法需符合《約翰奈斯堡原則》。

我們促請特區政府解釋，是否已經放棄《約翰奈斯堡原則》內的適用原則，以及《基本法》訂明保障的基本權利，包括表達和集會的自由。

作為律師，我們同時深切關注搜查律師事務所可能會違反《基本法》第35條訂明法律專業保密的基本權利，即「香港居民有權得到秘密法律諮詢、向法院提起訴訟、選擇律師及時保護自己的合法權益或在法庭上為其代理和獲得司法補救」。我們急切呼籲當局自我約束，確保法律專業保密權得到充份保障，以及全面維護所有香港市民參與政治的權利。

帝理邁
張達明
林洋鋐
蔡頴德
黃耀初

2021年1月7日

【Statement on the Mass Arrest under Article 22 of the National Security Law】
We, the undersigned, as legal practitioners who firmly believe in the Basic Law and the rule of law are deeply concerned that more than 50 pro-democracy lawmakers, activists and lawyers, were arrested yesterday for alleged subversion under Article 22 of The Law of the PRC on Safeguarding National Security in the HKSAR (“NSL”) for organising and/or participating in a primary election for candidates in the 2020 Legislative Council election.
At the press conference on 6 January, Senior Superintendent Steve Li confirmed that the Police had searched 72 premises with a warrant, including a law firm. No satisfactory explanation, however, was given by the authority at the press conference as to why Article 22 of the NSL was invoked in respect of these activities, when that provision expressly requires as an essential element of the offence the use of “force or threat of force or other unlawful means”. The organisation and conduct of the primary election did not involve any violence or other unlawful acts.
The right to participate in public affairs, irrespective of one’s political opinion, is enshrined under Article 25 of the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights and also protected under article 21 of the Bill of Rights Ordinance (Cap.383). It also plays a crucial role in the promotion of democratic governance and is fundamental to the rule of law in Hong Kong. Therefore, we strongly oppose and condemn any attempts to suppress peaceful exercise of the fundamental human rights enshrined in the Basic Law.
We note that back in March 2003, when the NSL was introduced, the Security Bureau still acknowledged the need for the national security legislation to be consistent with the Johannesburg Principles. Principle 2 of the Johannesburg Principles on National Security, Freedom of Expression and Access to Information, Freedom of Expression and Access to Information (U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/1996/39) provides that “A restriction sought to be justified on the ground of national security is not legitimate unless its genuine purpose and demonstrable effect is to protect a country's existence or its territorial integrity against the use or threat of force, or its capacity to respond to the use or threat of force, whether from an external source, such as a military threat, or an internal source, such as incitement to violent overthrow of the government.”
We call upon the Government to explain whether it has abandoned any due regard to the Johannesburg Principles and the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Basic Law, including the freedom of expression and assembly.
As lawyers, we are further troubled by the search of a law firm, which could violate the fundamental right of residents to legal advice as set out in Article 35 of the Basic Law. We urgently urge the authorities to exercise restraint, to ensure effective protection to legal professional privilege, and to fully uphold the right to political participation for all Hong Kong residents.

CHEUNG T.M. Eric
DALY Mark
LAM Kenneth
TSOI W.T. Michelle
WONG Davyd

Dated this 7 January 2021

Posted @withregram • @alex_cwy 《Two variations of an wheel roll out 兩種腹輪的訓練方法》

第四波疫情下大家都會選擇家中健身， 市面上有不同種類的健身器材使用， 而腹輪是相對便宜和慳位的工具訓練腹肌， 是家中鍛練腹工具不二之選，而其中腹輪的訓練變化能偏向不同肌肉能參與動作 ，以下會同大家介紹兩個腹輪訓練的變化

📍脊椎帶動
屈曲脊椎 （脊椎前彎)帶動腹輪， 令腰部呈拱形弧度，脊椎屈曲動作能令腹直肌 俗稱六舊腹肌 的參與度上升， 但同時也需要脊椎需要一定的柔軟度才能掌握動作 ，以及腰背有傷患的學生不是太理想動作

📍肩膊帶動
此變化目的是把腹輪帶出及收入的時候， 下背腰保持中立位置， 當收回腹輪的時候，避免使屈曲脊椎帶動動作， 並感覺肩膊下壓（肩伸) 帶動動作， 腹部和臀部保持收緊 ，避免拗腰動作出現, 由於此變化中不需脊椎有任何屈曲動作，所以較為適合有腰背傷患的學員。另外，由於主導動作是肩伸， 所以背闊肌參與度也會增加

如果大家覺得以上資料有用的話 ，不妨like share 同埋follow 我個page啦 ， 黎緊都會擺多d不同的健身資訊！

Hoping everyone stay safe under the fourth wave of COVID-19 !! I would like to share two variations of abs wheel roll-out that everyone can try out at home , since abs rollout is a fairly advanced exercise, if you don’t have much experience in abs training , master some basics exercise such as plank , cat-cow to strengthen the mind-muscle connection prior to working on ab wheel

📍Driven by spine
Meaning that “curl the spine” in order to bring the wheel back to your body , this will involve in spinal flexion, which means superficial layer of abs will be engaged (rectus abdominis). However, for some trainee who have lower back injury such as flexion intolerance lower back pain , this maybe not be an ideal abs exercise, Also, it require some degree of motor control and mobility on lumber spine flexion in order to master the exercises

📍Driven by shoulder
The purpose of this variation is to keep the spine neutral through out the exercises and none of the spinal movement will be involved
, rather than “curl the spine”, this cueing of this exercise is to “bring the elbow to your back pocket “ while the spine and pelvic stays neutral . By bringing the elbow back , this will result in more back muscle engagement ( latissimus dorsi). Although this variation doesn’t’t work the superficial layer of abs like the former variation, but it’s a good modification for those who trains around with back pain

Thank you for your time !! If you feel it’s useful please like and share the post and follow my page for more posts !! @markys_strength_performance