關於 issue report中文 ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

***《請大家多多注意！》***
這篇想說明一下關於今天發生的盜用我身分及利用作疑似詐騙事件，及想請大家以後多多注意，小心不要被假帳騙取個人資料的。

今早一起來就收到來自朋友及大家各方的通知&詢問訊息，內容都是關於一個疑似是我的身分的個人FB帳號。
**再次澄清，該帳號並不是我本人所開的帳號！！！**
該個人帳號是利用了近似本專頁的帳號所開的，而名稱及頭像照片都是用了我的。
本專頁的帳號為 siutaoCOS，而該帳號則用了siutaoC0S，把cos中的英文字「O」轉為了數字「0」以混淆視聽。
當時該假帳的一則貼文內容為一些奇怪的中文及請大家在一個奇怪網站填寫表格，而該網站也是用了本人的身分，內容疑似是想要詐騙大家的個人資料（包括信用卡資料）。
本人發現後已即時發出澄清及請大家幫忙檢舉的貼文（即今天下午本專頁、本人個帳、本人IG上所發表的）
該假冒帳號的擁有者看到後，來給本專頁發來了DM，還反問我為什麼要搞砸他，最後還發出惡言反罵我。及後，在大家幫忙檢舉期間，該假冒帳號卻把其帳號的貼文、轉帖通通刪除，把頭像等等的都全部換掉，想要逃過FB審查。而FB審查到現在還是堅持為該帳號沒有問題。

到這刻我也無能為力了😢
非常感謝大家一起幫忙檢舉該假冒帳號，雖然還沒能成功檢舉，但以此希望警惕一下大家要小心謹慎，防止被詐騙😭🙏🏻💦
此次事件中如果你有曾經把個資給了假冒帳號的話，建議請立刻更改相關資料/帳號，加強保安，防範被盜用該資料/帳號的可能。

*****在此也向大家再次聲明，
本人不會隨便以任何個人帳號加好友，除非已事前作公開通知/私下通知/經過溝通達成共識。
（也希望大家體諒一下我也需要私人空間🙏🏻😢）
以FB專頁也只此一個，並沒其他分頁！！！（Singapore及Vietnam Fans Page為本人認可，不是什麼假帳。）
以及，除通販作用外，本人並不會要求大家提出個人資訊。該通販用的資訊也絕對不會交給第三方，不會外流！
還請大家以後也多多注意了！如有發現/遇到假冒帳號的話，請幫忙檢舉！😭🙏🏻*****

再次感謝大家支持、相信及幫忙！愛你們😭🙏🏻❤️

————————————

**<>**
This post will be describing the incident that has happened earlier today, and I would like everyone to be aware and not accidentally give away personal information to a fake account.

This morning when I woke up, I received notifications and questions from friends and everyone, regarding a Facebook account pretending to be mine. *I would like to remind everyone again that this account is not created by me!!!*
This account was recently created and used the same name and profile as my own. My page link is siutaoCOS, and this fake account used siutaoC0S, changing the capitalized [O] in the link name to the numeral [0] zero to befuddle everyone.

During that time, the account created a post that asked everyone to fill in their information in a suspicious website, which was created under a fake identity, attempting to scam personal and credit card information.
Upon discovery, I have posted clarifications and requested everyone to assist in reporting the post. My clarifications were posted on my page, Instagram and personal account.
The scammer messaged my page directly after my revealing that the account was a fake, and asked why I wanted to ruin him, and even harshly scolded me in return for no reason. After that, with the assistance of everyone, the scammer deleted all related information to the attempted scam and changed his profile and cover picture to avoid Facebook’s automated investigation system. In the end, Facebook declared that there was no issue with the scammer’s account.

At this point I was powerless to do anything. 😢
I would like to thank everyone’s efforts in reporting the account, and though it was not successful, I would like to take this opportunity to inform everyone to be aware, and not get scammed by impersonation efforts.😭🙏🏻💦
If by any chance you had filled in personal information or other information, please immediately change all passwords and information, and contact relevant agencies if necessary. This is to prevent misuse of your information and linked accounts.

*****I would also like to mention, that I would not randomly add friends into my personal account, unless it was a public notice, privately discussed or agreed upon.
(I would like everyone to understand that I need some personal space as well🙏🏻😢).
This is my only page on Facebook and I have no other pages!!! (The Singapore and Vietnam Fan Pages were approved by me, and they are not fake accounts or impersonators.)
Apart from direct sales, I will never request for information from anyone. This information from sales will not be disclosed to anyone else or to a third party! In the future, if anyone notices an impersonator or fake account, please help me to report them!😭🙏🏻******

Once again, I would like to thank everyone who has supported me, believed in me and helped out! Love you all! 😭🙏🏻❤️

【法政匯思就社會進一步動盪的聲明】
【Statement on Further Escalation of Social Unrest】
// 當體制構建不能保障市民應有的追索權，暴力兼「私了」必如落山流水跟著來，這已清晰可見。僅說無諾，何能「止暴制亂」？
// Where the system fails to provide proper recourse, vigilantism and violence proclaiming self-defence arise as simple cause and effect. Without any real commitment by the Government to de-escalate and defuse the political crisis, verbal condemnation and physical crackdown will do nothing to ‘stop violence and curb disorder’.
https://www.facebook.com/…/a.455221741311…/1474268236073377/

【法政匯思就社會進一步動盪的聲明】
【Statement on Further Escalation of Social Unrest】(Scroll for English)

1. 近日，警隊的行為就如國際特赦組織所言越見低劣。[1] 這皆因政府漠視其專家提供的建議，並以歇斯底里、毫無章法可言的策略回應持續的動盪。

2. 五個月來，政府持續容許以下情況發生，對警政問題及根本的政治危機藥石亂投：
a. 阻礙救護人員前往現場拯救傷者；[2]
b. 偏頗地處理強姦或酷刑對待被拘留人士的指控；[3]
c. 肆無忌憚地濫用武力；[4]
d. 以諸多藉口為警察的失控或報復行為辯解。[5]

3. 法政匯思強烈譴責警隊濫用武力，及其本末倒置、往往為社區添煩添亂的驅散示威者行動。警方在十一月十一日於香港中文大學（「中大」）、香港理工大學及香港大學等驅散非法集結及/或堵路行為的行動，指稱的事實根據惹人非議。[6] 在撰寫此聲明之時，警方甚至以催淚彈及橡膠子彈回應中大校長的善意，與學生發生激烈衝突，造成最少60人受傷及多人被捕。[7]

4. 歸根究底，現有的制度未能公正地調查涉及警務人員的刑事指控，乃是警民衝突的源頭。樂觀地看，這可能只是個別調查人員的疏忽；悲觀地看，這反映一種互相包庇的文化，可能已由員佐級警員到警務處處長、保安局局長甚至特首，滲透警隊及政府上下。無論是哪一個情況，這種警察橫行無忌的觀感已經令公眾對負責調查大部分罪行的警察的信任蕩然無存。這個缺口一開，刑事司法制度剩下非常有限的能力，處理失職警員。

5. 法政匯思繼續呼籲香港政府成立獨立調查委員會，調查包括六月份以來政府的治安管理手段。除了將肇事者繩之於法外，更重要的是全面檢閱香港警隊以達至結構上的改革。至今，特區政府對於這個明顯又實際的選擇不屑一顧，堅持讓一個缺乏監察權力的獨立監察警方處理投訴委員會（「監警會」）[8] 去調查警察投訴及內部調查科。這正正就是問題根源所在。

6. 監警會委派的國際專家組就這個問題發表《進展報告》。國際專家組與政府持相反意見。他們批評監警會在結構上欠缺全面調查權力，對監警會這一個輕型、監管式的體制是否能夠做出決定性的貢獻表示懷疑，更指出下一步的可能性諸如「委派一個享有所需權力的獨立調查機構以作更深程度及更廣泛的調查」，意味著一個獨立調查委員會。[9]

7. 對於近數星期暴力頻頻，政府沒有採取任何行動，只是堅拒示威者的訴求（包括成立獨立調查委員會），更稱他們為「人民的敵人」。[10] 警員們多月來非人化地濫稱示威者為「曱甴」。[11]

8. 法政匯思絕對不認同法外制裁。此立場於七月二十五日之聲明已表明。然而，當體制構建不能保障市民應有的追索權，暴力兼「私了」必如落山流水跟著來，這已清晰可見。僅說無諾，何能「止暴制亂」？

法政匯思
2019年11月15日
(PDF: https://tinyurl.com/tt2nzmr)

1. Police conduct has seen, in the words of Amnesty International, ‘another shocking low’ [1] in recent days as the Government ignored constructive feedback by its own experts and hysterically responded to the ongoing unrest without any rational strategy.

2. In particular, these allegations point to a wanton failure on the part of the Government to properly approach policing and the underlying political crisis, now in its 5th month:

a. Obstructing rescuers and ambulances from accessing the injured; [2]
b. Unfair handling of allegations of rape and torture in custody; [3]
c. Unapologetic excesses in its use of force; [4] and
d. Evasive defence of police officers acting impulsively or in retaliation. [5]

3. The Progressive Lawyers Group (the ‘PLG’) vehemently condemns the Police regarding their excessive use of force and dispersal operations which often create the chaos sought to be quelled. On 11 November, the police conducted operations in, amongst others, the Chinese University of Hong Kong (‘CUHK’), the Polytechnic University of Hong Kong and the University of Hong Kong to disperse unlawful assemblies and/or obstruction of traffic, [6] the factual basis of which has been doubted by many. As at the drafting of this Statement, as riot police responded to an olive branch by the CUHK Vice-Chancellor with tear gas and rubber bullets, severe clashes between students and riot police at CUHK are ongoing with at least 60 injured and dozens arrested. [7]

4. Nonetheless, the crux of the problem remains in the institutional failure to investigate criminal allegations involving police officers impartially. At best, it could be an omission by individual police officers in their execution of duty. At worst, it could be a culture that acquiesces and conceals wrongdoings affecting grassroot constables, the Commissioner of Police, the Secretary for Security and the Chief Executive alike. Whichever the case may be, this perception of impunity breaches the trust and confidence the public reposes in the police who are tasked with investigating most offences. With this link broken, there remains very limited recourse in the criminal justice system against rogue officers.

5. The PLG continues to call on the Hong Kong Government to appoint a Commission of Inquiry regarding, amongst others, the current approach to policing social unrest since June. Bringing wrongdoers to justice aside, the more important task is a holistic review on the Police Force and a roadmap to structural reforms. So far, the Government brushed aside this obvious and pragmatic option, insisting upon an inquiry by the Independent Police Complaints Council (‘IPCC’) [8] whose (lack of) oversight over the Complaints Against Police Office (‘CAPO’) is the very issue at the heart of the current saga.

6. Curiously, the International Expert Panel of the IPCC appointed for advice on that very inquiry seems to hold a contrary view. In their Position Statement Report of Progress, the experts pointed out ‘structural limitations in the scope and powers of the IPCC Inquiry’ and noted that ‘it remains to be seen whether a light touch, oversight body like the IPCC, can make sufficient progress to produce any decisive contribution…’ It also identified a possible next step such as ‘a deeper more comprehensive inquiry in a number of respects by an independent body with requisite powers’, alluding to a Commission of Inquiry. [9]

7. In response to the extraordinary brutalities these few weeks, the Government did nothing but maintain that it will not yield to the protesters’ demands (including an independent Commission of Inquiry) and call them ‘enemies of the people’. [10] It has not helped that the police have for months been blatantly using such a dehumanising term as ‘cockroaches’ to refer to protesters [11].

8. The PLG stands by our Statement on 25 July 2019 and does not encourage citizens to take justice into their own hands. However, it is obvious by now that where the system fails to provide proper recourse, vigilantism and violence proclaiming self-defence arise as simple cause and effect. Without any real commitment by the Government to de-escalate and defuse the political crisis, verbal condemnation and physical crackdown will do nothing to ‘stop violence and curb disorder’.

The Progressive Lawyers Group
15 November 2019
(PDF version: https://tinyurl.com/tt2nzmr)

我一直有個疑問，為什麼在科技業的人講話都要中英文夾雜？

過去我一直以為，那可能是因為在科技業的人都是高學歷高知識份子，而高學歷等同於英文好，甚至有許多國外留學回來的菁英，因此講話帶英文是再正常不過的事。

直到自己也進入科技業打雜，才發現這一切是文化、是習慣，好像你不這麼講話就不是一份子🤣，很多時候用中文講也真的是怪怪的，但我非常確信這跟英文好不好沒有半毛錢關係！

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

『上次for某某某shipment status怎麼樣了？交期confirm了嗎？客人deadline什麼時候？有quality issue要highlight，同時要確認payment不要delay。』
#god我head好pain🤦‍♀

『等一下3點meeting幫忙booking一下會議室，別忘了set up投影機，報告再run一下看有沒有問題，檔案scan給我或是print出來。』
#到底直接說印出來是會怎樣🙄

『剛才討論的issue你們有什麼concern嗎？可以support嗎？有的話現在highlight出來，如果沒問題我們以後就這樣process。』
#需要給你一支螢光筆嗎

『這樣出貨會有很大的risk，我們不能process，請你們double conform再發mail出來！』
#沒有doubleconform只有reconfirm

『這個project老闆很care，你study一下再跟我report。』
#很care🤣#是不能好好講話嗎

諸如此類的辦公室對話每天都在上演，老實說也早就見怪不怪，有些單字每天這樣用反而永遠不會忘記，但許多錯誤也因此積非成是，一直錯誤用下去。

像是請人確認某件事情，很多人會說conform，但其實conform是遵守遵照的意思，而非確認。確認請說confirm（嘴巴要閉起來），請人家再次確認要說reconfirm或是confirm again，double confirm是確認兩次的意思。雖然我們一定看得懂你想表達的，但這種引人發笑的錯誤還是改掉比較好🙈

還有一種常見錯誤是Please be noted that．．（請人注意留意某事），哎呀呀沒有這種用法，Please note that才對，不需要用被動喔🙈

#中英文夾雜表示professional
#也可能只是lazy
#職場culture好funny
#歡迎加入discuss🤣🤣🤣