Search
IT界震撼彈《致國安局的公開信 ：投訴OGCIO腐敗》？政府嘅tender 一向「作風優良，能打勝仗」，疫情期間大家也見到甚麼檢測公司、檢測酒店，背後的利益網絡更是耐人尋味。今次一班IT人睇唔過眼，發信予国安，識玩。
政府的招標一向多故事，看到中資近年勇奪多項政府tender就可見一斑，今次到底誰是誰非？我沒內幕，不過OGCIO已開始應變，回應了着這宗涉嫌貪嗔癡的災難；至於版主也把相關帖文刪除，似乎一場好戲正在上演。
政府回應
https://www.facebook.com/OGCIOHK/photos/a.125329725492414/573545507337498/?type=3
LIHKG討論
https://lihkg.com/thread/2650799/page/1
The meaning of re-provoking 721 | Lee Yee
LIHKG forum started a thread titled “Congratulations to the Hong Kong Police Force (HKPF) for Raising Global Awareness Again for the Jul. 21 incident (721).” There were continuous comments on the thread that linked to international media reports on the HKPF’s various deliberate misrepresentations. Many social media were also swept by a flood of all the videos previously published since 721: live broadcasts, subsequent comprehensive reports including Hong Kong Connection’s “721 Yuen Long Nightmare” which had 8.32 million views in just over five months since the clip was published, and “Truth of 721” which had over 1.3 million views since its upload last month. The large amount of visual media trending on social media is the explosion of citizens actions to challenge the copious amount of lies.
The biggest effect of HKPF re-provoking 721 is to let those Hongkongers, especially foreigners, whose memories of the incident have faded, to remember it again. How can people believe the fabricated lies when they once again witness the scenes and listen to the people who lived through it recount the experience? In that case, what is the purpose of reviving people’s memory? Surely it is not because the trust score of Carrie Lam’s regime is not low enough?
Hong Kong has realized the words of the Russian author and dissident, Aleksandr Isayevich Solzhenitsyn, of whom I once quoted: “We know they are lying. They know they are lying. They also know that we know they are lying. We also know that they know that we know they are lying. But they are still lying.”
A reader asked me the source of this quotation but I could not find it. It was only based on the Internet, nevertheless it is fantastic. Solzhenitsyn had written so many articles on deception and the authoritarian regime so it is possible that he had said it just once during a conversation. Another Russian writer, Elena Gorokhova, said something similar in a book published in 2010: “The rules are simple: they deceive us, we know they are lying, they know that we know they are lying, but they keep on lying to us, and we keep on pretending to believe them.” The significance of re-provoking 721 is spelled out in these two passages.
Why are they still lying when they know that we know that they are lying? This is because, under the tyranny of totalitarianism, the fabrication of lies is not to make the people believe but to make one’s case sound plausible when justifying with the superior. 721 was a defining moment in the timeline of the anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill (anti-ELAB) movement that reversed the perception of the people of Hong Kong and the international community towards the HKPF and HKSAR government. In other words, after the incident, the image of the HKPF tumbled from the protector of the people to a tool of tyranny. Therefore, the distortion of facts is not for the people to believe but to let their “own people” including their superiors to “pretend to believe” so as to maintain the “legitimacy pretense.”
Another implication of re-provoking this incident is that the behavior of lying even when knowingly they cannot deceive proves the existing regime is a true tyranny.
Solzhenitsyn said, “Tyranny finds its only refuge in falsehood and falsehood in tyranny finds its only support.” “Tyranny must be interwoven with falsehood. Between them, they have the closest and deepest natural union.” Because of this intimate natural bonding, in the presence of deceptions regardless of whether people will believe it or not, it is tantamount to proclaiming the existence of tyranny.
The significance of re-provoking this incident is threefold. It also illustrates the greatest crisis in Hong Kong. It is not those in power and the pro-Beijing camp pretending to believe in the distorted facts, but that the increasing number of Hongkongers willing to tolerate the lies and also pretending that the stag is a horse. The Czech dissident writer and former President of Czechoslovakia, Václav Havel said that when people “have to acquiesce, endure and drift along with the lies, then every person can only survive in lies. People do not need to accept lies, it is enough that they endure a life of living in and with lies. In this way, people validate, perfect, create and become this system.”
The Chinese have “become this system.” Hongkongers must not only protect the truth, but also be wary of themselves and the people around them to not pretend to believe in lies and not participate in distorting facts for personal gain. Solzhenitsyn said, “If we are fearful even to detach from the participation of lying, then we are worthless and hopeless.” The sarcasm of Russian writer, Alexander Sergeyevich Pushkin, is most applicable to us: “Why give animals freedom? Their fate is to be bound by chains and flogged with whips, generation after generation!”
Hongkongers must take heed of this heart-wrenching remark!
The biggest danger that can befall us | Lee Yee
The debate around the pan-democrats’ leaving or staying is heated. What I am concerned about is the thinking during this debate. Perhaps the process is more important than the result.
I quoted from Mao in last week’s article: “We must support whatever the enemy opposes, and we must oppose whatever the enemy supports.” This is a common way of thinking, whether among the Chinese and Hong Kong Communists, Hong Kong pro-democracy camps, young protesters, and even certain political commentators. They often use this line of thinking to judge and justify their words and actions.
My article sparked discussion on LIHKG, with the focus on whether we should act in the opposite direction as the “enemy”. Some think that I was mainly targeting and reprimanding the LIHKG community, because many of them oppose certain words and actions based very simply on whether “the CCP is the happiest”. Others pointed out that YouTube KOLs mention “the CCP is the happiest” like a broken record.
Days ago, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian said, “Some U.S. politicians suppress China because they are afraid of China’s development. The harder they suppress, the more it proves China’s success, and the more it shows that China did it right.”
Luo Huining, director of the Liaison Office of the Central People’s Government, said in response to the sanctions imposed by the United States, “This shows exactly how I did all the right things for my country, for Hong Kong.”
Alvin Yeung said in an interview a few days ago, “The Civic Party was the DQ (disqualification) champion, four out of six of our candidates were disqualified, and three out of our four incumbent lawmakers were disqualified. This proves that the regime does not like what we have done.”
A commentator said, “The CCP and Hong Kong Communists wish to see that we split, therefore we must do the opposite, avoid splitting.”
Why is it that whatever the enemy opposes must be right, and whenever the enemy is happy it must be wrong? What is the logic behind right and wrong? The pro-Communists have discussed both options for the pan-democrats, does it mean neither should be done?
To do the opposite, the opposite must be justified. Only a lazy person with dependent thinking will oppose for the sake of opposing.
Whatever we do should be backed by our own principles and considerations, and not to base it on whether it makes the enemy happy or not to choose and judge words and actions. If being DQ’d means it was right, then does not being DQ’d mean it was wrong? Should there be a split between political parties, it should be one on the issues of principle. “Harmony” that reconciles but disregards principles is not desirable.
The CCP’s usual propaganda: China’s 1.4 billion people, including Hong Kong’s compatriots, support the “return”; 1.4 billion people, including Taiwan compatriots, oppose Taiwan’s independence. The thing is, the future of Hong Kong or Taiwan hugely impact Hongkongers and Taiwanese, but have very little to do with the interest of the 1.4 billion people. The Québec independence referendum only asked the Québec people to vote, and not all Canadians; the Scotland independence referendum only sought votes in Scotland. By the same logic, whether the pan-democrats accept the appointment to extend their tenures or not, only the opinions of the pro-democracy voters should be considered. Including the pro-Beijing voters is the equivalent of including 1.4 billion people into deciding for the future of Hong Kong and Taiwan.
Before the implementation of the national security law, Hong Kong Public Opinion Research Institute (PORI) conducted a public opinion survey on June 15-18 regarding the law. The results showed that the majority of Hongkongers opposed the law. However, a survey conducted by Hong Kong Research Association on July 2-5 showed that 66% of Hongkongers supported the implementation of the law, because the question asked was not whether to support the national security law, but whether it should be included in Annex III of the Basic Law. Clearly, the latter survey had a stance around which the question was designed. This sort of guiding survey is skewed.
Regarding the survey about the extension of the Legislative Council, it should first be asked whether the decision to extend for no less than a year is accepted, then within the forced extension of the Legislative Council, the options of staying or leaving en masse. In addition, the option of a small number to accept the appointment while the majority does not. If there is first the stance, then it is no different from a pro-Communist survey.
In 1946, American diplomat George Kennan sent a long telegram from Moscow, which launched the cold war between the United States and the Soviet Union. The renowned diplomat offered a word of caution to the American policymakers: “After all, the greatest danger that can befall us in coping with this problem of Soviet communism, is that we shall allow ourselves to become like those with whom we are copying.”
The various aforementioned thinking has just entered the realm where “biggest danger that can befall us”, as warned by Kennan.
#me_me_review
review影片Credits:
1. [月經] iOS集中討論區 (167) iBra Pro Max - LIHKG
https://lihkg.com/thread/2335026/page/1
2. AirPods - Apple (香港)
https://www.apple.com/hk/airpods/
3. 哇！珍妮佛羅培茲！by 小尾巴
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-ZQhTXbc7I&ab_channel=%E5%B0%8F%E5%B0%BE%E5%B7%B4
4. Coin Master 廣告 中文/英文/日文版 | Coin Master ad in Chinese/English/Japanese
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDeNkfY5zh0&ab_channel=XiaoKa%E5%B0%8F%E5%92%96
5. 哇！珍妮佛羅培茲加入了戰鬥！by GoogleWeeFee
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBYvVsxxoLI&t=8s&ab_channel=GoogleWeeFee
6. Cyberpunk 2077 - Launch Glitches Trailer (Bug Compilation)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqEMEjJj4hs&ab_channel=RyanCampbellBeans
7. Cyberpunk 2077 Advanced A.I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwYPmMrzY6I&ab_channel=Meddle2K
8. Going to bed in Cyberpunk 2077
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5UtxSM3d_l4&ab_channel=Drift0r
9. Turns out you can play baseball in Cyberpunk 2077
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwZLPT-s1JE&ab_channel=Buffelz
10. Welcome... to #Cyberpunk2077 on PS4 fat / XBO !
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dc1fU98fxNM&ab_channel=LegolasGamer
11. Cyberpunk2077 - Reddit
https://www.reddit.com/r/cyberpunkgame/
12. 《全民造星III》衝擊！粉紅童話世界崩塌！魔樂師小妍失控落淚！
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y14rUitOGF8&t=13s&ab_channel=ViuTV
仆直牛棚 DISCORD GROUP!!!!
https://discord.gg/NEUrvkf
商業聯絡:
[email protected]
Instagram: @POKJIC_C @cmg_chi_ma_gun
https://www.instagram.com/pokjic_c/?h
Song: Feel Special - Twice
Background Music:
1. Operatic_3
2. TOP 10 Funky Music (No Copyright Music)
- Jazz in paris
- Switch it up
- Say yeah
- Festival
3. Funk Background Music - No Copyright
FAQ:
Pc Spec:
CPU: AMD R9 3900X
GPU: ASUS RTX 2080 SUPER TURBR (WATER COOLED)
RAM: KLEVV 3600Mhz 32GB (4x8 GB)
M/B: ASROCK X570 TAICHI
CASE: ANTEC P120 CRYSTAL
FAN: PRIZM 120 ARGB
WATER COOLING: BARROW
SSD: Samsung PM981a 512GB 3D TLC M.2 NVMe PCIe 3.0 x4 SSD
Gaming Gear
Mice: Logitech G502 Lightspeed / Steelseries Aerox 3 Wireless
Mousepad: Steelseries QCK Prism 3XL
Keyboard: Logitech G913 Linear / Corsair K100
Headset: Razer Nari Essential / Apple Earpods / Logitech G Pro X Wireless
Mic: Razer SEIREN X / Elgato Wave 3
Chair: Zenox Nebula
SFX: Elgato Stream Deck
Camera: Sony A6400
Recroding Software: Nividia Shadow Play
Live Stream Software: OBS studio
Video Editing Software: Vegas Pro
時間軸:
0:00 開場白
0:45 珍妮佛羅培茲
2:28 Airpods Max = BRA
4:19 粉紅色世界
6:42 Cyberbug
10:08 完啦條片
紀錄片: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQRAfJyEsko
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dw_kid12/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deepwebkid/?modal=admin_todo_tour
訂閱: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKC6E5s6CMT5sVBInKBbPDQ?sub_confirmation=1
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/album/2LjUOH9T9j21GiX8jzytu6
異度空間恐怖APP: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PiyPZ3d_Fw&t=12s
首支單曲: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UASHWB6Ai9Y
鬼故事: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-CfqxuCHq3Y&t=3s
我的成長故事: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kdhtp6A6YJE
我講 '香港' 10,000次: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-G4uDe3QUfs
我受夠了, 我的精神困擾: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQ6uxaQhiS4&t=7s
24小時內學印度話: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3EmtyVK1BQ&t=55s
回憶我兩年前拍過的虐畜影片
拍虐畜影片這些事 (我的親身經歷)
2017年11月到2018年6月是我拍片生崖當中, 我所稱為 ‘尷尬期’ 的時段. 我當時是想由拍英文鬼故頻道影片同時希望轉型生活類型影片和講東話影片. 出來的效果就是一大堆又煩又cho又不好笑又沒人看又常常得罪人的誇張內容. 不要要求我給你看, 因為這些影片現時已被刪除.
暗網仔出街的觀眾大家好! 我今天想懺悔當中拍了一部I feel ashamed and guilty i ever did it. 在這裡講這段故事改變不了什麼也叫不回所造成的傷害. 大家也歡迎看完這條影片之後不再支持我. 但我怕今天不拍出這條片我日後不會講出這個故事但uw yeen會想起而後fooy. 多謝你們給我一個機會去講.
神父 我有罪!
[跟倉鼠生活48小時]
2018年6月16號我上載了一條養一隻倉鼠兩天的影片. 長達8分27秒的影片嘗試混合 ‘實驗型’ 影片和 ‘?物型’ 影片, 完全為了拿views. 由那兩天不同的時間點去講做寵物主人難chui, lut look的地方. Suen便搞笑.
影片一開頭去商店買倉鼠是我第一次拍攝時被質問的情況, 挺值得講. 因為只是照顧兩天的關係倉鼠生活的環境完全不理想, 只是放他在買回來的箱子中生活. 因為影片需要新鮮感我會在不同時間拍他還有不同地點去拍他. 當時我完全沒有意圖繼續yoing這隻小動物, 所以最後過了48小時我轉yoing比我更有愛心的兄弟yoing. 幾個月後這位倉鼠也離開了我們.
上載這條影片後有網友説每一次拍這隻小動物的時候他樣子也很害怕和焦慮. 由Muk生環境加上我每次突然間的拍攝引起. 但當時chuw luw的我只是當這個小生命跟拍片的工具沒兩分別. What are you doing man? Having to watch this video now makes me suffer. Hing hung當時這些影片沒有人看, 否則我一定繼續拍下去.
其實我記得小時候的我挺有愛心的. 9到11歲有yoing一隻倉鼠的我, 有pet這樣東西在童年也jim一個挺重要的部分.
我記得當年su假我去了香港leuy hung. 原本我媽媽應該照顧我隻chung mut. 之後她無la la又自己由加拿大飛去香港將我隻倉鼠交給一班挺Heartless的family friend. 我是說他們全家. 我當時knew something bad was going to happen because they tried to like tried to use a hose to spray my hamster before and torture and have a history of treating animals like not lives. I remember my mom went back before me and she said when she got my pet back he was so quiet and in a few days died. He was abused, my mom even said so herself.
I couldn’t even see his last time and he was buried. I remember getting off the plane crying in the shower. After when I talked about everyone just laughed at me and called it just a pet. And everyone pretended like nothing happened, next topic. But for a time he was my best friend.
Ever since that day I never bonded with animals again, because I was like: they are just animals. Like garbage. But it’s not true. They are living beings and friends. And I see that now.
I think I’m feeling like this because the way I treated the hamster is the way my hamster died. And I feel guilty for my childhood and now.
That’s why I needed to Film this video today.
[my first pet]
[owning a pet for views, the good way and the bad way to do it.]
I want to start by acknowledging their are good youtubers who raise pets. And I feel the key to doing this properly is to really in your heart, feel that connection to the pet. Not use it for views.
我有follow一位叫yanki, 即是火guy姐的女生常常post有關animal abuse這個問題. She constantly does it and reminds everyone it is a huge problem. Suey yeen我之前拍那一條影片某ching do上是這方面一個不好的教材. 但我現在可以做的是下面有一條link是一個有關這方面的documentary, roing大家了解更多. 也希望世間上所有ley hoi的小倉鼠也可以得到安息吧! Bye bye.
================
出左一段時間既LaMetric TIME 智能鬧鐘，終於比到時間我開箱啦！
LaMetric TIME 智能鬧鐘可以與互聯網連接，亦能為你顯示重要信息。LaMetric TIME 除咗可顯示時間，仲可以自己定制內容的LED彩色展示牌。此外社交網絡信息、股價、天氣、新聞、郵件、日程等一切都可以係LaMetric TIME 呈現，搭配不同APP打造最專屬於你的智慧時鐘。
基本功能：
可設定時間、天氣、話題、下次會議召開的倒計時、新郵件、CrossFit定時和健康目標、股票行情和社交網絡通知、藍牙喇叭等
特別功能：
Facebook的贊數、網站訪問量、付費轉換率，以及在應用商店的排名、下載量和收入等
購買連結: https://shop.pegasus.hk/products/202128/LaMetric%20Time%20%E6%99%BA%E8%83%BD%E9%AC%A7%E9%90%98
官方網站: https://lametric.com/
Internet-connected clock makes your space unique with charming clock faces, controls smart home with a glance, tracks digital metrics in real time, creates music atmosphere with dance of pixels
Get only important information with always-on smart clock
Inspired by enchanted devices concept, LaMetric Time is still a clock which ideally fits your cozy home but, when needed, it transforms into intelligent assistant which clearly shows weather, smart home notifications, business metrics and others important information. There is no need to spend your expensive time for digging on slow loading sites or smartphone apps in order to get important things, they are delivered in a natural way, at a glance. Be less dependant on the smartphone, spend more time with the family, but never miss anything important with LaMetric Time.
快D加入我地最新既討論區?https://www.facebook.com/groups/pegasushk.group/
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
－ Whatsapp 砌機查詢: https://wa.me/85267924078
－ 網店 : https://shop.pegasushk.net/customize-pc
－ Facebook: https://fb.com/PegasusHK.net
－ YouTube: https://youtube.com/c/PegasusComputer
－ Website: https://www.pegasushk.net
－ Instagram: @pegasus.hk
飛馬電腦 - 唔止砌機咁簡單
Pegasus Computer - More than just a System Builder.
