今早為Asian Medical Students Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK)的新一屆執行委員會就職典禮作致詞分享嘉賓,題目為「疫情中的健康不公平」。
感謝他們的熱情款待以及為整段致詞拍了影片。以下我附上致詞的英文原稿:
It's been my honor to be invited to give the closing remarks for the Inauguration Ceremony for the incoming executive committee of the Asian Medical Students' Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK) this morning. A video has been taken for the remarks I made regarding health inequalities during the COVID-19 pandemic (big thanks to the student who withstood the soreness of her arm for holding the camera up for 15 minutes straight), and here's the transcript of the main body of the speech that goes with this video:
//The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, continues to be rampant around the world since early 2020, resulting in more than 55 million cases and 1.3 million deaths worldwide as of today. (So no! It’s not a hoax for those conspiracy theorists out there!) A higher rate of incidence and deaths, as well as worse health-related quality of life have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, including people of lower socioeconomic position, older persons, migrants, ethnic minority and communities of color, etc. While epidemiologists and scientists around the world are dedicated in gathering scientific evidence on the specific causes and determinants of the health inequalities observed in different countries and regions, we can apply the Social Determinants of Health Conceptual Framework developed by the World Health Organization team led by the eminent Prof Sir Michael Marmot, world’s leading social epidemiologist, to understand and delineate these social determinants of health inequalities related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
According to this framework, social determinants of health can be largely categorized into two types – 1) the lower stream, intermediary determinants, and 2) the upper stream, structural and macro-environmental determinants. For the COVID-19 pandemic, we realized that the lower stream factors may include material circumstances, such as people’s living and working conditions. For instance, the nature of the occupations of these people of lower socioeconomic position tends to require them to travel outside to work, i.e., they cannot work from home, which is a luxury for people who can afford to do it. This lack of choice in the location of occupation may expose them to greater risk of infection through more transportation and interactions with strangers. We have also seen infection clusters among crowded places like elderly homes, public housing estates, and boarding houses for foreign domestic helpers. Moreover, these socially disadvantaged people tend to have lower financial and social capital – it can be observed that they were more likely to be deprived of personal protective equipment like face masks and hand sanitizers, especially during the earlier days of the pandemic. On the other hand, the upper stream, structural determinants of health may include policies related to public health, education, macroeconomics, social protection and welfare, as well as our governance… and last, but not least, our culture and values. If the socioeconomic and political contexts are not favorable to the socially disadvantaged, their health and well-being will be disproportionately affected by the pandemic. Therefore, if we, as a society, espouse to address and reduce the problem of health inequalities, social determinants of health cannot be overlooked in devising and designing any public health-related strategies, measures and policies.
Although a higher rate of incidence and deaths have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, especially in countries with severe COVID-19 outbreaks, this phenomenon seems to be less discussed and less covered by media in Hong Kong, where the disease incidence is relatively low when compared with other countries around the world. Before the resurgence of local cases in early July, local spread of COVID-19 was sporadic and most cases were imported. In the earlier days of the pandemic, most cases were primarily imported by travelers and return-students studying overseas, leading to a minor surge between mid-March and mid-April of 874 new cases. Most of these cases during Spring were people who could afford to travel and study abroad, and thus tended to be more well-off. Therefore, some would say the expected social gradient in health impact did not seem to exist in Hong Kong, but may I remind you that, it is only the case when we focus on COVID-19-specific incidence and mortality alone. But can we really deduce from this that COVID-19-related health inequality does not exist in Hong Kong? According to the Social Determinants of Health Framework mentioned earlier, the obvious answer is “No, of course not.” And here’s why…
In addition to the direct disease burden, the COVID-19 outbreak and its associated containment measures (such as economic lockdown, mandatory social distancing, and change of work arrangements) could have unequal wider socioeconomic impacts on the general population, especially in regions with pervasive existing social inequalities. Given the limited resources and capacity of the socioeconomically disadvantaged to respond to emergency and adverse events, their general health and well-being are likely to be unduly and inordinately affected by the abrupt changes in their daily economic and social conditions, like job loss and insecurity, brought about by the COVID-19 outbreak and the corresponding containment and mitigation measures of which the main purpose was supposedly disease prevention and health protection at the first place. As such, focusing only on COVID-19 incidence or mortality as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities may leave out important aspects of life that contributes significantly to people’s health. Recently, my research team and I collaborated with Sir Michael Marmot in a Hong Kong study, and found that the poor people in Hong Kong fared worse in every aspects of life than their richer counterparts in terms of economic activity, personal protective equipment, personal hygiene practice, as well as well-being and health after the COVID-19 outbreak. We also found that part of the observed health inequality can be attributed to the pandemic and its related containment measures via people’s concerns over their own and their families’ livelihood and economic activity. In other words, health inequalities were contributed by the pandemic even in a city where incidence is relatively low through other social determinants of health that directly concerned the livelihood and economic activity of the people. So in this study, we confirmed that focusing only on the incident and death cases as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities is like a story half-told, and would severely truncate and distort the reality.
Truth be told, health inequality does not only appear after the pandemic outbreak of COVID-19, it is a pre-existing condition in countries and regions around the world, including Hong Kong. My research over the years have consistently shown that people in lower socioeconomic position tend to have worse physical and mental health status. Nevertheless, precisely because health inequality is nothing new, there are always voices in our society trying to dismiss the problem, arguing that it is only natural to have wealth inequality in any capitalistic society. However, in reckoning with health inequalities, we need to go beyond just figuring out the disparities or differences in health status between the poor and the rich, and we need to raise an ethically relevant question: are these inequalities, disparities and differences remediable? Can they be fixed? Can we do something about them? If they are remediable, and we can do something about them but we haven’t, then we’d say these inequalities are ultimately unjust and unfair. In other words, a society that prides itself in pursuing justice must, and I say must, strive to address and reduce these unfair health inequalities. Borrowing the words from famed sociologist Judith Butler, “the virus alone does not discriminate,” but “social and economic inequality will make sure that it does.” With COVID-19, we learn that it is not only the individuals who are sick, but our society. And it’s time we do something about it.
Thank you very much!//
Please join me in congratulating the incoming executive committee of AMSAHK and giving them the best wishes for their future endeavor!
Roger Chung, PhD
Assistant Professor, CUHK JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, @CUHK Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong 香港中文大學 - CUHK
Associate Director, CUHK Institute of Health Equity
「mitigation measures中文」的推薦目錄:
mitigation measures中文 在 國家衛生研究院-論壇 Facebook 的最佳貼文
➥重點摘要:流行病學家通常需要幫政策決定者決定「減災」要達到的目的:如「減少致病率及死亡率」、「避免壓垮醫療照顧服務的流行高峰」、「維持經濟損失在可控制的範圍」、「或拉低流行曲線以等待疫苗及藥物的量產」等目的。
武漢肺炎強制隔離措施對經濟造成的影響非常巨大,疫苗的研發不是問題,但疫苗與藥物的量產則需要時間。因此,目前減災可行的方法只剩下隔離、停止大型集會、停班停課、及封城等手段,用社會隔離的方式降低再生數(R0)。
而影響社會隔離措施的幾項因素為:有多少感染者有輕微症狀?這些人是否願意配合自我隔離?在出現症狀後這些人是否能及時隔離?無症狀感染的期間有多長及這段時間的感染力如何?在西方民主國家,個人,而非政府的行動,才是社會隔離政策是否成功最重要的因素。
縮短症狀出現至隔離的時間非常重要,因它可減少傳染的機會延緩流行的發生;但與此同時,亦應減少家戶傳染、支持居家醫療、並處理因停班而造成之家庭經濟損失。醫療照顧的需求可能仍然很高,無症狀傳染會是這項措施成功與否的關鍵。
接觸者追蹤在初期控制擴散是很重要的一環。再生數2.5的情況下,至少需追蹤70%的接觸者以控制早期的傳播。中國、南韓、義大利、及伊朗的資料顯示,致死率隨年齡增加,在慢性疾病者身上更高,針對這個族群進行社會隔離應該可降低死亡率。
在2014~2016西非伊波拉病毒疫情中,死亡率增加與醫療照護系統飽和及醫療照護人員死亡有關,因此,必須加強醫療照護系統的支持並保護員工避免感染。統計模型預測可告知這些社會隔離措施可降低多少傳染。政府應告知民眾預防感染最好的方法並對可能的經濟損失提供協助。(中文摘要轉譯:「財團法人國家衛生研究院」莊淑鈞博士整理)
📋How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? (2020/03/14)+中文摘要轉譯
➥Author:Roy M Anderson, Hans Heesterbeek, Don Klinkenberg, et al.
➥Link: The Lancet
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673620305675?via%3Dihub
#2019COVID19Academic
衛生福利部
疾病管制署 - 1922防疫達人
疾病管制署
國家衛生研究院-論壇
mitigation measures中文 在 mitigation measures-翻译为中文-例句英语 - Reverso Context 的相關結果
使用Reverso Context: mitigation and adaptation measures, risk mitigation ... space debris mitigation measures,在英语-中文情境中翻译"mitigation measures" ... <看更多>
mitigation measures中文 在 disaster mitigation measures - 國家教育研究院雙語詞彙 的相關結果
出處/學術領域, 英文詞彙, 中文詞彙. 學術名詞 海洋科學名詞-近岸工程, disaster mitigation measures, 減災對策. 以減災對策 進行詞彙精確檢索結果 ... ... <看更多>
mitigation measures中文 在 mitigation measures - 英中– Linguee词典 的相關結果
大量翻译例句关于"mitigation measures" – 英中词典以及8百万条中文译文例句搜索。 ... <看更多>