Multiply your Seeds
“They reasoned with one another, saying, “It’s because we have no bread.” Jesus, perceiving it, said to them, “Why do you reason that it’s because you have no bread? Don’t you perceive yet, neither understand? Is your heart still hardened? Having eyes, don’t you see? Having ears, don’t you hear? Don’t you remember? When I broke the five loaves among the five thousand, how many baskets full of broken pieces did you take up?” They told him, “Twelve.” “When the seven loaves fed the four thousand, how many baskets full of broken pieces did you take up?” They told him, “Seven.” He asked them, “Don’t you understand, yet?”” (Mark 8:16-21 WEB)
Are you reasoning in your heart, “Oh it’s because I don’t have that, that is why my life is doomed for failure.”
When Jesus multiplied the bread and fishes, He used less food to feed more people.
For the five thousand men, He started with 5 loaves and 2 fishes. After the multiplication, there were 12 baskets full of leftovers.
For the four thousand men, Jesus started with 7 loaves and a few small fishes. After the miracle, there were only 7 baskets full of leftovers.
So since the disciples did not bring any bread with them, based on the pattern, Jesus would be able to miraculously form much more bread than in the previous two miracles, if there was a need!
Your lack is not a problem for God. In fact, the weaker you are in the natural, the more perfectly God’s grace will be demonstrated in that very area.
What is it that you need? Is it finances? Perhaps you feel like you are starting with only 1 loaf and 1 fish. Great—you qualify for great grace! Sow what the Holy Spirit puts in your heart and thank God for supplying all your needs according to His riches in glory in Christ Jesus.
He will take that little and begin multiplying it into much. Don’t forget, the little boy had to hand over his lunch before he could see the multiplication miracle. Who has the biggest right to bring home the 12 baskets full of leftovers? The little boy of course!
This is the part where many Christians fail. Once they have to offer something, especially money, they start to justify why it is not needed anymore, and they convince themselves that the church is just trying to rip them off.
The same ones are okay with spending frivolously on entertainment and enjoyment, but seal up their pockets when it comes to giving as unto the Lord.
This is due to lack of understanding about the principle of sowing and reaping. This is the way that God has ordained for seed to be multiplied to the sower.
There is nothing better you can do than to sow into God’s kingdom. Sponsor the Gospel of Jesus Christ and feed the widows and orphans, especially from the same household of faith. Act on this word in faith, and see what happens!
The 37 recorded miracles of Jesus Christ in the four gospels show us God’s heart of love and Grace towards us. As you explore them in “Messiah’s Miracles”, faith will arise in your heart to receive miraculous breakthroughs in your own life: https://bit.ly/messiahs-miracles
over qualify 在 Re: [討論] Overqualified 是不是一個很蠢的概念? - 看板Tech_Job 的推薦與評價
作為剛找到新工作的人，不敢說多有面試的經驗，但我是覺得你大概沒經歷過太多。
先提overqualification這件事。招募人才，尤其是招募好的人才是很花成本、很花時間的。若是一名員工overqualify，肯定待不久。舉我前同事的例子，他就是典型overqualify，公司要他做的事太簡單，他想做的公司不願意投資，待了一陣子他就沒興趣再待了，剛好有很好的機會，薪水直接翻倍，他就走了。他當初這麼說的："我值兩倍的薪水，但你們讓我做的事就是只值這個價格，也不可能給我更高的薪水。"現在網路資訊這麼發達，不同公司的待遇太容易比較了，一旦一個員工overqualify，公司不能滿足他待遇和成長的空間，他必然會走的。
再來談面試。確實面試不能100%認清一個人的能力，但好的面試確實可以篩選出較有能力的，或較合適的人才。
我經歷過的面試都是先和主管電話面試，然後才是on-site面試。電話面試先是聊一些過去的經歷(剛畢業是聊學校的研究)或是基礎的知識或技能。on-site面試都是五個小時起跳，跟五六個人一對一面試，中間再穿插一到兩個小時的presentation。
我面試時，每個人簡單聊了一下履歷上的東西之後，開始直接問技術問題，很多是我沒做過的，必須用經驗和知識去推敲出solution。這種面試，沒有一定的程度一定被刷掉。
面試第一份工作時，還沒有什麼經驗，被問的主要是專業上的知識和方法論(如何做研究)。
面試除了問工作能力外，也考驗表達能力和與人互動的能力。一個人就算是能力滿分，但若無法與人共事還是沒用。對公司來說，一個人能力120分，溝通40分，對比一個人能力80，溝通80，公司肯定是選後者。更別說多的是強者，能力又強又能言善道。
我不認為五年計劃是多天馬行空的問題，五年計畫可以是個人職涯，也可以是公司、部門發展規劃。沒有計畫表示那個人只是找份工作，沒有計畫提升自己。我第一份工作的五年計畫就是我要升到senior engineer，五年到了找新工作，面試時我跟面試官說我的五年計畫是我要當上technical lead。
確實是有些行為上的老梗問題常常被問，這些可以提前準備的問題，如果都準備不好，只會讓人覺得根本無心面試吧？
※ 引述《hass231470 ()》之銘言：
: 現在的面試, 似乎越來越在考驗申請者的"申請技巧"與"面試能力"
: 而不是真正的"工作能力"
: 而"Overqualified", 我認為更是一個很詭異的觀念
: 你如果要的是人才, 沒有什麼overqualified的問題
: 而是該停止無腦的快篩, 該進入談談真正工作與用人問題了
: 你會嫌你看的醫生overqualified嗎? 你會嫌教你的老師overqualified嗎?
: 甚至你會嫌修你家水電的技工overqualified嗎?
: "來, 告訴我的你5年計畫是什麼?"
: 實際上面試官自己可能都答不出來
: 不知道為何到現在照著這些Q&A, 持續問這些蠢問題, 結果剩下很會面試的人
: 而不是真正的去認識一個真實的呈現在你面前的人
: 這是個假新聞充斥, HR不做Human Resource, 主管不知道自己要什麼的年代
: 也是工作重申請能力, 而不是工作能力的年代
: 你, Overqualified了嗎?
: 你們覺得呢?
-----
Sent from JPTT on my Samsung SM-G950U.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 172.58.227.180
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Tech_Job/M.1552672124.A.731.html
... <看更多>