今早為Asian Medical Students Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK)的新一屆執行委員會就職典禮作致詞分享嘉賓,題目為「疫情中的健康不公平」。
感謝他們的熱情款待以及為整段致詞拍了影片。以下我附上致詞的英文原稿:
It's been my honor to be invited to give the closing remarks for the Inauguration Ceremony for the incoming executive committee of the Asian Medical Students' Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK) this morning. A video has been taken for the remarks I made regarding health inequalities during the COVID-19 pandemic (big thanks to the student who withstood the soreness of her arm for holding the camera up for 15 minutes straight), and here's the transcript of the main body of the speech that goes with this video:
//The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, continues to be rampant around the world since early 2020, resulting in more than 55 million cases and 1.3 million deaths worldwide as of today. (So no! It’s not a hoax for those conspiracy theorists out there!) A higher rate of incidence and deaths, as well as worse health-related quality of life have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, including people of lower socioeconomic position, older persons, migrants, ethnic minority and communities of color, etc. While epidemiologists and scientists around the world are dedicated in gathering scientific evidence on the specific causes and determinants of the health inequalities observed in different countries and regions, we can apply the Social Determinants of Health Conceptual Framework developed by the World Health Organization team led by the eminent Prof Sir Michael Marmot, world’s leading social epidemiologist, to understand and delineate these social determinants of health inequalities related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
According to this framework, social determinants of health can be largely categorized into two types – 1) the lower stream, intermediary determinants, and 2) the upper stream, structural and macro-environmental determinants. For the COVID-19 pandemic, we realized that the lower stream factors may include material circumstances, such as people’s living and working conditions. For instance, the nature of the occupations of these people of lower socioeconomic position tends to require them to travel outside to work, i.e., they cannot work from home, which is a luxury for people who can afford to do it. This lack of choice in the location of occupation may expose them to greater risk of infection through more transportation and interactions with strangers. We have also seen infection clusters among crowded places like elderly homes, public housing estates, and boarding houses for foreign domestic helpers. Moreover, these socially disadvantaged people tend to have lower financial and social capital – it can be observed that they were more likely to be deprived of personal protective equipment like face masks and hand sanitizers, especially during the earlier days of the pandemic. On the other hand, the upper stream, structural determinants of health may include policies related to public health, education, macroeconomics, social protection and welfare, as well as our governance… and last, but not least, our culture and values. If the socioeconomic and political contexts are not favorable to the socially disadvantaged, their health and well-being will be disproportionately affected by the pandemic. Therefore, if we, as a society, espouse to address and reduce the problem of health inequalities, social determinants of health cannot be overlooked in devising and designing any public health-related strategies, measures and policies.
Although a higher rate of incidence and deaths have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, especially in countries with severe COVID-19 outbreaks, this phenomenon seems to be less discussed and less covered by media in Hong Kong, where the disease incidence is relatively low when compared with other countries around the world. Before the resurgence of local cases in early July, local spread of COVID-19 was sporadic and most cases were imported. In the earlier days of the pandemic, most cases were primarily imported by travelers and return-students studying overseas, leading to a minor surge between mid-March and mid-April of 874 new cases. Most of these cases during Spring were people who could afford to travel and study abroad, and thus tended to be more well-off. Therefore, some would say the expected social gradient in health impact did not seem to exist in Hong Kong, but may I remind you that, it is only the case when we focus on COVID-19-specific incidence and mortality alone. But can we really deduce from this that COVID-19-related health inequality does not exist in Hong Kong? According to the Social Determinants of Health Framework mentioned earlier, the obvious answer is “No, of course not.” And here’s why…
In addition to the direct disease burden, the COVID-19 outbreak and its associated containment measures (such as economic lockdown, mandatory social distancing, and change of work arrangements) could have unequal wider socioeconomic impacts on the general population, especially in regions with pervasive existing social inequalities. Given the limited resources and capacity of the socioeconomically disadvantaged to respond to emergency and adverse events, their general health and well-being are likely to be unduly and inordinately affected by the abrupt changes in their daily economic and social conditions, like job loss and insecurity, brought about by the COVID-19 outbreak and the corresponding containment and mitigation measures of which the main purpose was supposedly disease prevention and health protection at the first place. As such, focusing only on COVID-19 incidence or mortality as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities may leave out important aspects of life that contributes significantly to people’s health. Recently, my research team and I collaborated with Sir Michael Marmot in a Hong Kong study, and found that the poor people in Hong Kong fared worse in every aspects of life than their richer counterparts in terms of economic activity, personal protective equipment, personal hygiene practice, as well as well-being and health after the COVID-19 outbreak. We also found that part of the observed health inequality can be attributed to the pandemic and its related containment measures via people’s concerns over their own and their families’ livelihood and economic activity. In other words, health inequalities were contributed by the pandemic even in a city where incidence is relatively low through other social determinants of health that directly concerned the livelihood and economic activity of the people. So in this study, we confirmed that focusing only on the incident and death cases as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities is like a story half-told, and would severely truncate and distort the reality.
Truth be told, health inequality does not only appear after the pandemic outbreak of COVID-19, it is a pre-existing condition in countries and regions around the world, including Hong Kong. My research over the years have consistently shown that people in lower socioeconomic position tend to have worse physical and mental health status. Nevertheless, precisely because health inequality is nothing new, there are always voices in our society trying to dismiss the problem, arguing that it is only natural to have wealth inequality in any capitalistic society. However, in reckoning with health inequalities, we need to go beyond just figuring out the disparities or differences in health status between the poor and the rich, and we need to raise an ethically relevant question: are these inequalities, disparities and differences remediable? Can they be fixed? Can we do something about them? If they are remediable, and we can do something about them but we haven’t, then we’d say these inequalities are ultimately unjust and unfair. In other words, a society that prides itself in pursuing justice must, and I say must, strive to address and reduce these unfair health inequalities. Borrowing the words from famed sociologist Judith Butler, “the virus alone does not discriminate,” but “social and economic inequality will make sure that it does.” With COVID-19, we learn that it is not only the individuals who are sick, but our society. And it’s time we do something about it.
Thank you very much!//
Please join me in congratulating the incoming executive committee of AMSAHK and giving them the best wishes for their future endeavor!
Roger Chung, PhD
Assistant Professor, CUHK JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, @CUHK Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong 香港中文大學 - CUHK
Associate Director, CUHK Institute of Health Equity
同時也有4部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過27萬的網紅MYBY孟言布语,也在其Youtube影片中提到,Remember to like, comment, subscribe and turn on notifications~ Dayday's Social Media Instagram: Dayday_boy Weibo: 孟天Wiley Blair's Social Media: In...
「rich media中文」的推薦目錄:
- 關於rich media中文 在 Roger Chung 鍾一諾 Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於rich media中文 在 為何斯德哥爾摩沒有譚仔三哥 by 三家姐 Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於rich media中文 在 黃傑龍 Simon - 窮富翁 好人好事 Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於rich media中文 在 MYBY孟言布语 Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於rich media中文 在 The Regina. Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於rich media中文 在 Xiaomanyc 小马在纽约 Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於rich media中文 在 圖形API 參考v16.0:User Rich Media Documents 的評價
- 關於rich media中文 在 Unrealistic Outcomes | Transparency Center - Facebook 的評價
- 關於rich media中文 在 iSpring Pro 7.1 adds 1-click YouTube video creation from rich ... 的評價
rich media中文 在 為何斯德哥爾摩沒有譚仔三哥 by 三家姐 Facebook 的最讚貼文
《臭雞方程式》
Follow開我嘅讀者都知,我最近被人狙擊,仲被賜名三鳩蛆、三奸姐、39姐。(個人最鐘意39姐,3939,又易打又順口。)我呢條仆街都笑鳩得人多喇,只能講得一句出得嚟行預咗要還。事情令到好多朋友都好擔心,等我同大家簡單解釋一下發生咩事啦。
首先係單向嘅私怨,我被幾名喺瑞典居住嘅港人以「唔照手足意思share瑞典港人集會文宣、已讀不回」為名討伐。早喺運動發生前,嗰名有心人已經一早Cap晒我story,居心顯然易見。(瑞典華人,尤其香港人個圈子其實好細,我知係邊個搞事,但我做三家姐呢幾年間學識咗開名公審人係唔啱,我幾年前都犯過呢個錯,所以盡量都唔想開名喇。)關於集會,我同我老公都有出席,不過唔想post喺自己平台暴露行蹤畀對家。都係嗰句啦,斯德哥爾摩識睇中文嘅華人個圈子係好細。喺瑞典間期,我一直私下都有約香港朋友出去貼海報貼街招,但我從來冇喺social media上提過。呢幾年間我學會將網絡上嘅工作同私生活分開。貼街招冇提,或者會有人屌我咁撚驚就唔好貼,到我提又話我攞光環,呢類操作耳熟能詳。
事情越演越烈,突然冒出一堆以一位經常喺Facebook微博間、簡體繁體間彈出彈入嘅中年Rich woman為首嘅團體。呢個團體每日都花好多時間去分析我一言一行,翻箱倒籠將我歷年所有出過嘅文章斷章取義。有啲指控仲關乎到我嗰位做水警嘅姐夫,想像力好到話我一直聽讀者心事就係為過料畀黑警。唔止咁,佢仲拉住一大堆指控,每日都身體力行嚟我度留言,又拉大隊去我出版社度留言,要人回應事件否則不罷休。
早喺呢場運動前,Q&A聆聽讀者心事我一向都有做。我亦堅信黑警會落地獄。由於篤魁呢個指控太嚴重,所以我早已另外公開回應咗。不過佢既然狙擊得,又點會只狙擊一樣呢?
廣東人做雞嘅方法有好多,但將一個女人嘅置諸死地嘅方法只有一個,就係做鳩佢係雞。公式大家都心中有數,不外乎話佢整容、貪錢、出身貧賤、私生活唔檢點。首先當然係要攻擊佢嘅外表,一係話佢醜,一係就話佢整容。一不離二,講完個樣當然要講身材,胸大就話你肥,胸細就話你飛機場,胸有肉地但你唔肥呢?咁你啲奶必定係假嘅,好噁心好虛偽啊!最後一招當然係要話你嘅私生活唔檢點。咩話,唔係處女?人人馬上化身網上聖母,將怒火狠狠敲喺佢老公新買畀佢嘅iPhone鍵盤上面,審判呢位陌生賤人所犯下嘅淫蕩罪。
以上嘅招數有邊個唔識,問題係依家已經係2019年,喺連港豬都經已醒覺嘅時代,點解仲會有一堆人冥頑不靈,用臭雞方程式去數臭一個女人。
作為一個成年人,變靚有咩問題?講粗口有咩問題?著低胸衫有咩問題?同男朋友扑嘢有咩問題?學歷又可以去評定一個人嘅品格咩?嗰啲乜撚嘢高官,學歷夠高啦啩,日日四點鐘擘大眼講大話,又有值得人尊敬嗎?我喺2016年就已經公開表態覺得整容冇問題(詳見《華健妹》一文,記得睇晒),內在美固然重要,但只專注內在美而忽略外在美都係一種膚淺(詳見《願我十八廿二就懂的事》第163頁)。一個人如果能夠承擔金錢同手術嘅風險,整完自己又開心咗,why not?矽膠從來唔會令一個人變得虛偽,但匿埋喺電腦後面,用聖人嘅標準向其他人指手劃腳就好撚虛偽。
好笑嘅係依家網上一堆自稱識得我,但其實十鳩幾年冇聯絡、或者根本唔識唔熟嘅人,喺網絡世界度大講一啲不負責任嘅說話,對我依家嘅存在去加鹽加醋。唔止批評我人格,神通廣大到連我同我老公嘅愛都可以否定。所謂嘅知情人士啊,如果你認為我唔埋你堆、唔同你聯絡就已經等於得罪你,所以你就要咁樣抹黑我的話,你嘅行動只係再一次證明我呢個決定係有幾正確。
每個人嘅人生都係屬於自己,一個人嘅價值亦從來係取決於自己。而唔係由一啲同你根本素未謀面,或者只係萍水相逢嘅人去衝量。我哋嚟到呢個地球咁辛苦做人,從來唔係為咗令全世界去鐘意自己,而係搵到同志同道合嘅人一齊行。成世流流長,總會遇到人渣,自己亦有犯錯嘅時候。重要嘅係而家嘅你同你心中所相信嘅事,而唔係一啲閒雜人等腦裡面嘅殘影。被人攻擊當然唔開心,我都曾經因為呢件事傷心失落過。但繼續好好活下去,努力成為一個更好嘅人,先係對付惡言好最好反擊。
附上快樂的外國雞照片一張。
rich media中文 在 黃傑龍 Simon - 窮富翁 好人好事 Facebook 的最佳貼文
以下係我已經喺WhatsApp收咗三次嘅前高等法院英女王御用大律師,Henry Litton (列顕倫)* QC ;給香港市民的一封信:~ (裏便了無新意, 不過有兩個好處. 1) 洋人寫係唔同啲, 仲要係有名望嘅大法官, 特別有說服力 2)啲英文寫得好靚, 仲有中文翻譯可以學習英文。
Henry Litton (列顕倫)* QC was the Judge of the highest Court in Hong Kong. He retired in 2015.
英女皇御用大律師列顕倫(亨利·利頓)QC,是香港最高法院的法官。他於2015年退休。
The following is what he’s written...
以下是他寫的。
There are few certainties in life. One of them is this: The common law system underpinning Hong Kong’s “core values” is destined to expire in 27 years’ time. The One Country Two Systems formula was designed to last for 50 years and no more. Hence Article 5 of the Basic Law. There is no mechanism in the Basic Law for the system to continue beyond 30 June 2047.
生活中很少有確定性。其中之一是:支撐香港“核心價值”的普通法制度將在27年後失效。一國兩制方案的設計時限是50年,之後,再也沒有了。因此,“基本法”第五條清楚指出。2047年6月30日以後,“基本法”中沒有任何機制讓這制度繼續下去。
All the calls for Freedom, Democracy etc have no meaning if the common law crumbles.
如果普通法崩潰,所有要求“自由、民主”等的呼籲都是沒有意義。
If the protesters truly value their professed aims, *their focus should be on demonstrating to Beijing and to the rest of the world that the One Country Two Systems formula works, and to promote an atmosphere in which Beijing feels comfortable with the system – and when the time comes, to extend the Basic Law for another 50 years, 100 years*. Then liberal democratic norms and values might have a chance to flourish.
如果抗議者真的誠心誠意的重視他們宣稱的目標,*他們的重點、重心,應該是向北京和世界其他地方展示“一國兩制”的方案是有效的,並推展“一國兩制”的成功實施。令北京對這一制度感到寛心舒泰的環境下 - 當時機成熟時,說服北京將“基本法”再延長50年,100年*。那麼,自由、民主的模式、準則和價值觀還可能有延續蓬勃、活躍的機會。
Crunch time is not 27 years away. It is just round the corner. For Hong Kong to continue as one of the world’s greatest financial and trading centres, planning for the future must necessarily look 20 -30 years ahead. So the hard question will soon be asked: is the common law system to continue beyond June 2047 ? The answer lies in Beijing and nowhere else.
擔心不安的時刻不是27年後的事。就在拐角處。要使香港繼續成為世界上最大的金融和貿易中心之一,對未來的規劃必須著眼於未來20-30年。因此,我們很快便會提出一個棘手的問題:普通法制度是否會延續至2047年6月以後?答案就在北京,而不是其他任何地方。
The last time this issue arose – back in 1982 – Hong Kong had the backing of Great Britain. This time Hong Kong stands alone. And, up to this point, Hong Kong has demonstrated for all the world to see that the One Country Two Systems formula is extremely fragile: and, if the unrest continues, it would surely fracture beyond any hope of recall.
回顧1982年,上一次被問到這個問題的時候,當時香港是得到了大英帝國的支持。而這一次,香港只能孤掌難鳴。到目前為止,香港已經向全世界展示了“一國兩制”這方案是極其脆弱的:如果動亂繼續下去,它肯定會褫奪,無望地被撤銷。
It is beyond the power of the Hong Kong SAR government to devise the governing model for the future. Pressing the Hong Kong government to promote greater democracy is futile. Rightly or wrongly, that power lies in Beijing. Nowhere else. Hong Kong enjoys freedoms found nowhere else in China. To think that unlawful assemblies and demonstrations, and violence in the streets, would soften Beijing’s attitude towards Hong Kong is absurd. Common sense suggests it would have the opposite effect.
為未來設計治理模式,是超出了香港特別行政區政府的權力範圍。要迫使香港政府促進更大的民主是徒勞的。不管是你喜歡也好。不喜歡也好。權力就是在北京。沒有別的地方了。香港現在享有中國其他地方沒有的自由。認為非法集會示威和街頭暴力會軟化北京的對香港的態度是荒謬的。常識表明,它只會產生相反的效果。
But there are deep social issues which the SAR government can redress, having regard in particular to the huge foreign currency reserves it holds:USD425 billion – by far the largest in the world, enough to guarantee public servants’ pensions hundreds of times over. And yet Hong Kong’s social services are crumbling, hospitals are understaffed, public education is poor, teachers are ill-paid, young people cannot afford to rent even the most substandard apartment, the gap between rich and poor is ever-widening.
但是,有一些深層次的社會問題是特區政府可以解決的,特別是考慮到特區政府擁有世界上最龐大的外匯儲備:4,250億美元 - 是政府公務員的長俸所需要的保證金額的數以百倍。然而,香港的社會服務卻每況愈下,醫院人手不足,全民所需的教育不論在質素及資源都極差,教師薪酬偏低。年輕人怎都難以負擔租用即使是最不合標準的居所,社會上,貧富差距在不斷拉大。
The laissez-faire policy of the colonial government has been carried to extremes by the SAR government in the past 20-odd years. The rich have prospered in the meanwhile whilst the bulk of the people suffered. The influx of Mainlanders under the One-Way Permit system has caused great strain on all services. The people’s needs have been neglected. The young see little prospect of a fulfilling future and even university graduates find difficulty in meaningful employment.
大英帝國殖民地政府的自由放任政策在過去二十多年來一直被特區政府極端化。與此同時,大多數富人們卻在此期間更加繁榮昌盛、更加富裕起來,而相反普通市民却受苦了。在單程證制度下,內地人士大量湧入,對所有服務造成更大壓力。市民的需求、需要被忽視。年輕人看不出有向上游、向上流的任何富圖的希望。甚至大學畢業生也很難找到有合識、合意的工作。
These, I suggest, are the deep-seated ills which sustain the fire of discontent in the wider community, and bring hundreds of thousands to march in the streets. These are not matters which a commission of inquiry can resolve.
我認為,這些水深火熱的社會問題及弊病,這些憤懣之火已經廣泛地蔓延在整個社會,並促使數以十萬人走上街頭。這些都不是一個所謂諮詢委員會可以解決。
The media here is full of Hong Kong stories, and of course footage of the riotous behaviour on the streets: what empty slogans, meaningless rhetoric the protesters display ……….In watching these events I am reminded of the prayer attributed to Saint Francis:
今天的媒體充斥著不同形式的香港事件,當然有街頭暴力行為的鏡頭:抗議者們展示的空洞口號和毫無意義的粗言穢語。…當我在觀看這些事件時,‘我想起聖弗朗西斯的禱告:
Pray God give me the courage to change the things I can change, the fortitude to bear the things I cannot change, and the wisdom to know the difference.
願上帝賜給我勇氣去改變我能改變的事情,給我勇氣去承受那些我無法改變的事情,給我智慧去分辨其中的黑白。
I arrive in Hong Kong Thursday 24 October, staying for one month.
我在今年的10月24日星期四抵達香港,逗留一個月。
As ever
如常,祝願香港
H
列顕倫
PS Please feel free to convey these observations to anyone you chose ………….They are *not confidential*.
歡迎隨時將我這些意見傳達給你所選擇的任何人.此文是*不保密的*。
rich media中文 在 MYBY孟言布语 Youtube 的精選貼文
Remember to like, comment, subscribe and turn on notifications~
Dayday's Social Media
Instagram: Dayday_boy
Weibo: 孟天Wiley
Blair's Social Media:
Instagram: Blairsugarman1
Weibo: @英国布莱尔
MYBY孟言布语
Weibo:MYBY孟言布语
微信公众号:孟言布语
哈喽各位MYBY们!这一期DAYDAY和黄布要聊一聊干爹的事!
这周要问问大家:你们怎么看sugar daddies这些事?你能接受吗?
在评论里告诉我们!
Hello all of you sexy MYBYers! We missed you like 宫保 misses its 鸡丁。In this episode Dayday and Blair talk about sugar daddies and sugar babies.
This week we want to ask of all our MYBYers, how do you feel about sugar babies and sugar daddies? Do yo have any stories to share?
Tell us in the comments!
Remember to like, comment and subscribe and click the bell so you get all of our new updates! !
![post-title](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/9Ozuk4i1EHg/hqdefault.jpg)
rich media中文 在 The Regina. Youtube 的最佳解答
點這邊訂閱我的頻道吧👏🏻 https://goo.gl/P94QPa
Click For More info.|點這邊看更多👇
🔎Social Media|來社群網站找我 🔍
Instagram https://instagram.com/thereginatw
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/thereginatw/
Official Blog http://theregina.com/
微博Weibo http://www.weibo.com/thereginatw
B站 http://space.bilibili.com/67431652/#!/index
小紅書 The Regina🌹
🔹Business Inquiries|合作接洽🔹
thereginatw@gmail.com
📌items in Video|影片資訊📌
Lookfantastic Taiwan
http://bit.ly/38YCBX8
BIOEFFECT EGF serum 15ml NT$5063 (原價)
http://bit.ly/33u3qBt
BIOEFFECT EGF Eye Serum 6ml NT$2633 (原價)
http://bit.ly/3d3Uwil
BIOEFFECT Daytime Moisturiser 30ml NT$2228 (原價)
http://bit.ly/2xEgjwU
ELEMIS Pro Collagen Ultra Rich Marine Cream 50ml NT$3443 (原價)
http://bit.ly/2IR3Acz
Aesop 香芹籽抗氧化精華 100ml NT$2250 (原價)
http://bit.ly/2wXaXwt
Aesop 山茶核仁滋潤面霜 60ml NT$1550 (原價)
http://bit.ly/2x3cMrA
APIVITA 快速保濕面膜 蜂蜜/補血草 NT$151 (原價)
http://bit.ly/38QDHnS
http://bit.ly/3a2sL8g
Barry M Fall In Love Eyeshadow Palette NT$284 (原價)
http://bit.ly/2WjCoeo
Natasha Denona Sunrise Palette NT$2430 (原價)
http://bit.ly/3d3UNBT
Delilah Colour Intense Cream Lipstick NT$689 #Flirt
http://bit.ly/3b1VE4g
Delilah Retractable Eyebrow Pencil NT$810 (原價) #Sable
http://bit.ly/3a86C8c
Delilah 8 Piece Brush Collection Set NT$5670
http://bit.ly/2wXNQlA
🔛Subtitles Wanted|徵求中/英字幕小幫手🔛
如有意願幫忙製作中文/英文字幕的朋友
歡迎直接製作中文/英文字幕
附上上傳字幕教學:https://goo.gl/uBqJPm
英文製作完成後請來信 thereginatw@gmail.com
已認領字幕的影片就不需要再重複認領囉!
📽Equipment|影音設備 📽
Camera 使用相機:Canon EOS M50+15-45mm
Editing App 剪輯軟體:Final Cut Pro X
🔱About My Look|今日妝容與搭配🔱
Foundation|粉底: Shiseido資生堂國際櫃 超進化持久氣墊
Lipstick|唇彩: Bobbi Brown 迷戀輕吻唇膏 #Cranberry
Eyelash Extensions|睫毛: LashLab 忠孝店
Nail Art|光療指甲: Lady's(nail/make up)
Hair|髮色: Happy Hair市府店 設計師Winnie
Thanks for your watching!
xoxo💋
♪ Tokyo Music Walker - Morning Station.
*This video is not sponsored.
![post-title](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/C145HBeAi98/hqdefault.jpg)
rich media中文 在 Xiaomanyc 小马在纽约 Youtube 的最佳貼文
My friend Jesse Appell is a full-time professional standup comedian in Beijing, China. He uses his fluent Mandarin to wow Chinese audiences with routines that combine American-style standup comedy with Chinese xiangsheng (crosstalk).
We had a wide-ranging conversation where we touched on what life is like for Jesse who has spent close to a decade living in China, how he got his Chinese to the point where he can perform comedic routines in Chinese, what it’s like doing comedy for Chinese audiences, what jokes work for them and what don’t, and what audience sensitivities are like for Americans performing in China. Overall an incredibly interesting interview!
Make sure to check out Jesse’s channel at:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuei4wLhQkQyyazpctkoKqA
Subscribe to my channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLNoXf8gq6vhwsrYp-l0J-Q?sub_confirmation=1
Follow me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/xiaomanyc/
Follow me on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/xiaomanyc/
If you guys like the music in my videos, you can check out all the AMAZING music Epidemic Sound has at my affiliate link here: http://share.epidemicsound.com/xiaomanyc
![post-title](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Iag0l8lgqIQ/hqdefault.jpg)
rich media中文 在 Unrealistic Outcomes | Transparency Center - Facebook 的推薦與評價
Misleading Health Claims: “Lose 5% of your body weight in a month!” “1 crazy tip to lose weight!” Misleading Recruitment of Litigants: Sensationalist content, ... ... <看更多>
rich media中文 在 iSpring Pro 7.1 adds 1-click YouTube video creation from rich ... 的推薦與評價
iSpring has had a product that supports rich-media content creation in PowerPoint since 2005. The rapid growth in mobile device use in ... ... <看更多>
rich media中文 在 圖形API 參考v16.0:User Rich Media Documents 的推薦與評價
The text entered in the typeahead used to retrieve a list of matching rich media documents based on Name or ID. 欄位. 由此關係連線進行的閱讀將回傳JSON 格式 ... ... <看更多>