關於 school design competition ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

#HannahEdApplyStory - Cựu học sinh Quốc tế Á Châu đạt học bổng tiến sĩ ở tuổi 23

18 tuổi, Trần Việt Nam được University of San Francisco, Notre Dame de Namur University, Menlo College, Santa Clara University, UC Santa Cruz cấp học bổng khi chuyển tiếp bậc đại học với tổng trị giá lên đến 136.000 USD. Chàng cựu học sinh Asian School đã quyết định theo học tại Santa Clara University (SCU) nhờ được chấp thuận vào chương trình liên thông 5 năm cả 2 bậc cử nhân và thạc sĩ.

Theo học tại SCU, Việt Nam được vinh danh trong danh sách Dean (2017) và được theo học chương trình danh dự của trường. Chàng sinh viên còn vinh dự trở thành thành viên Hội danh dự Kỹ sư Tau Beta Pi - hiệp hội của ngành kỹ thuật lớn nhất và lâu đời nhất nước Mỹ (thành viên được chọn là sinh viên các lớp kỹ thuật năm 3 trong top 8 của khóa hoặc sinh viên năm 4 top 5 của khóa).

Việt Nam đồng thời là đồng tác giả của 2 bài nghiên cứu khoa học đăng trong kỷ yếu hội nghị thường niên của Hiệp hội Xử lý thông tin và tín hiệu châu Á - Thái Bình Dương, Honolulu - Hawaii 2018, kỷ yếu Hội nghị quốc tế ACM lần thứ 22 về mô hình phân tích và mô phỏng hệ thống không dây và di động, Miami - Florida 2019 khi mới là sinh viên năm 3.

Mùa hè năm 2019, Trần Việt Nam trúng tuyển vào vị trí thực tập sinh chương trình nghiên cứu về robot ứng dụng trong phẫu thuật của Đại học Johns Hopkins (xếp hạng 9 trường đại học quốc gia hàng đầu của Mỹ theo U.S. News & World Report 2021).

Chương trình nghiên cứu được tài trợ bởi Quỹ Khoa học quốc gia Mỹ (NSF). Được biết vào năm 2018, gần 350 sinh viên trên toàn nước Mỹ nộp đơn và chỉ có 14 người được chọn vào chương trình này (tỉ lệ chấp nhận khoảng 4%).

Năm 2020, Nam giành chiến thắng ở giải Best Senior Design in Computer Engineering Session Award, tốt nghiệp cử nhân với danh hiệu Magna Cum Laude (bằng danh dự xuất sắc theo hệ thống giáo dục Mỹ).

Mặc dù đến tháng 6-2021 mới hoàn thành chương trình thạc sĩ ngành khoa học và kỹ thuật máy tính tại SCU, Trần Việt Nam vừa tiếp tục giành được học bổng toàn phần Research Scholarship chương trình tiến sĩ khoa học máy tính của NUS trị giá 100% học phí và đồng thời được cấp 2.000 SGD/tháng trong suốt khóa học.

Rất ít ứng viên đạt được học bổng Research Scholarship do số lượng được cấp rất giới hạn. Được biết, NUS là một trong những trường đại học lâu đời và được đánh giá cao không chỉ tại khu vực châu Á - Thái Bình Dương mà còn trên toàn thế giới. Trường xếp hạng 1 tại châu Á theo Asian University Rankings 2021, hạng 11 toàn thế giới theo QS World University Rankings 2021.

Bên cạnh thành tích vượt cấp ấn tượng, ít ai biết rằng Trần Việt Nam còn sở hữu nhiều kết quả học tập, nghiên cứu và năng khiếu đáng nể mà bất kỳ bạn trẻ nào cũng mơ ước: đạt TOEFL iBT 105 điểm (tương đương 620 điểm PBT) khi đang học lớp 8, đoạt giải thưởng Học giả AP quốc gia của Mỹ, là tác giả đứng đầu của bài nghiên cứu khoa học đã nộp cho Hội thảo ICRA 2020 nhờ vào chương trình nghiên cứu hè ở Đại học Johns Hopkins, đoạt huy chương đồng giải nhu thuật 2018 TCAAT Shuai Jiao Competition cấp tiểu bang, đai đen 1 vạch môn Shuai Jiao…

Link bài báo chia sẻ: https://bit.ly/3hotq9Y
-------------------------
🌎Các bạn muốn xin học bổng các học bổng trong và ngoài nước khác, đủ bậc nữa, đừng quên các lớp học bổng HannahEd, chương trình Mentor 1-1, Review hồ sơ luôn sẵn sàng để hỗ trợ các bạn tối đa.
Các bạn email thoải mái câu hỏi, CV về [email protected] hoặc nhắn tin cho page, page sẽ review free CV cho cả nhà.

Lịch học của lớp 2 tháng gần nhất: http://tiny.cc/HannahEdClass.
Link nhận thông tin về các chương trình Scholarship Support HannahEd: http://tiny.cc/HannahEdRegister
Link thông tin về lớp:
https://hannahed.co/lop-tim-va-nop-hoc-bong/

#HannahEd #duhoc #hocbong #sanhocbong #scholarshipforVietnamesestudents

📜 [專欄新文章] Uniswap v3 Features Explained in Depth

✍️ 田少谷 Shao

📥 歡迎投稿： https://medium.com/taipei-ethereum-meetup #徵技術分享文 #使用心得 #教學文 #medium

Once again the game-changing DEX 🦄 👑

Image source: https://uniswap.org/blog/uniswap-v3/

Outline

0. Intro1. Uniswap & AMM recap2. Ticks 3. Concentrated liquidity4. Range orders: reversible limit orders5. Impacts of v36. Conclusion

0. Intro

The announcement of Uniswap v3 is no doubt one of the most exciting news in the DeFi place recently 🔥🔥🔥

While most have talked about the impact v3 can potentially bring on the market, seldom explain the delicate implementation techniques to realize all those amazing features, such as concentrated liquidity, limit-order-like range orders, etc.

Since I’ve covered Uniswap v1 & v2 (if you happen to know Mandarin, here are v1 & v2), there’s no reason for me to not cover v3 as well ✅

Thus, this article aims to guide readers through Uniswap v3, based on their official whitepaper and examples made on the announcement page. However, one needs not to be an engineer, as not many codes are involved, nor a math major, as the math involved is definitely taught in your high school, to fully understand the following content 😊😊😊

If you really make it through but still don’t get shxt, feedbacks are welcomed! 🙏

There should be another article focusing on the codebase, so stay tuned and let’s get started with some background noise!

1. Uniswap & AMM recap

Before diving in, we have to first recap the uniqueness of Uniswap and compare it to traditional order book exchanges.

Uniswap v1 & v2 are a kind of AMMs (automated market marker) that follow the constant product equation x * y = k, with x & y stand for the amount of two tokens X and Y in a pool and k as a constant.

Comparing to order book exchanges, AMMs, such as the previous versions of Uniswap, offer quite a distinct user experience:

AMMs have pricing functions that offer the price for the two tokens, which make their users always price takers, while users of order book exchanges can be both makers or takers.

Uniswap as well as most AMMs have infinite liquidity¹, while order book exchanges don’t. The liquidity of Uniswap v1 & v2 is provided throughout the price range [0,∞]².

Uniswap as well as most AMMs have price slippage³ and it’s due to the pricing function, while there isn’t always price slippage on order book exchanges as long as an order is fulfilled within one tick.

In an order book, each price (whether in green or red) is a tick. Image source: https://ftx.com/trade/BTC-PERP

¹ though the price gets worse over time; AMM of constant sum such as mStable does not have infinite liquidity

² the range is in fact [-∞,∞], while a price in most cases won’t be negative

³ AMM of constant sum does not have price slippage

2. Tick

The whole innovation of Uniswap v3 starts from ticks.

For those unfamiliar with what is a tick:

Source: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/tick.asp

By slicing the price range [0,∞] into numerous granular ticks, trading on v3 is highly similar to trading on order book exchanges, with only three differences:

The price range of each tick is predefined by the system instead of being proposed by users.

Trades that happen within a tick still follows the pricing function of the AMM, while the equation has to be updated once the price crosses the tick.

Orders can be executed with any price within the price range, instead of being fulfilled at the same one price on order book exchanges.

With the tick design, Uniswap v3 possesses most of the merits of both AMM and an order book exchange! 💯💯💯

So, how is the price range of a tick decided?

This question is actually somewhat related to the tick explanation above: the minimum tick size for stocks trading above 1$ is one cent.

The underlying meaning of a tick size traditionally being one cent is that one cent (1% of 1$) is the basis point of price changes between ticks, ex: 1.02 — 1.01 = 0.1.

Uniswap v3 employs a similar idea: compared to the previous/next price, the price change should always be 0.01% = 1 basis point.

However, notice the difference is that in the traditional basis point, the price change is defined with subtraction, while here in Uniswap it’s division.

This is how price ranges of ticks are decided⁴:

Image source: https://uniswap.org/whitepaper-v3.pdf

With the above equation, the tick/price range can be recorded in the index form [i, i+1], instead of some crazy numbers such as 1.0001¹⁰⁰ = 1.0100496621.

As each price is the multiplication of 1.0001 of the previous price, the price change is always 1.0001 — 1 = 0.0001 = 0.01%.

For example, when i=1, p(1) = 1.0001; when i=2, p(2) = 1.00020001.

p(2) / p(1) = 1.00020001 / 1.0001 = 1.0001

See the connection between the traditional basis point 1 cent (=1% of 1$) and Uniswap v3’s basis point 0.01%?

Image source: https://tenor.com/view/coin-master-cool-gif-19748052

But sir, are prices really granular enough? There are many shitcoins with prices less than 0.000001$. Will such prices be covered as well?

Price range: max & min

To know if an extremely small price is covered or not, we have to figure out the max & min price range of v3 by looking into the spec: there is a int24 tick state variable in UniswapV3Pool.sol.

Image source: https://uniswap.org/whitepaper-v3.pdf

The reason for a signed integer int instead of an uint is that negative power represents prices less than 1 but greater than 0.

24 bits can cover the range between 1.0001 ^ (2²³ — 1) and 1.0001 ^ -(2)²³. Even Google cannot calculate such numbers, so allow me to offer smaller values to have a rough idea of the whole price range:

1.0001 ^ (2¹⁸) = 242,214,459,604.341

1.0001 ^ -(2¹⁷) = 0.000002031888943

I think it’s safe to say that with a int24 the range can cover > 99.99% of the prices of all assets in the universe 👌

⁴ For implementation concern, however, a square root is added to both sides of the equation.

How about finding out which tick does a price belong to?

Tick index from price

The answer to this question is rather easy, as we know that p(i) = 1.0001^i, simply takes a log with base 1.0001 on both sides of the equation⁴:

Image source: https://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php

Let’s try this out, say we wanna find out the tick index of 1000000.

Image source: https://ncalculators.com/number-conversion/log-logarithm-calculator.htm

Now, 1.0001¹³⁸¹⁶² = 999,998.678087146. Voila!

⁵ This formula is also slightly modified to fit the real implementation usage.

3. Concentrated liquidity

Now that we know how ticks and price ranges are decided, let’s talk about how orders are executed in a tick, what is concentrated liquidity and how it enables v3 to compete with stablecoin-specialized DEXs (decentralized exchange), such as Curve, by improving the capital efficiency.

Concentrated liquidity means LPs (liquidity providers) can provide liquidity to any price range/tick at their wish, which causes the liquidity to be imbalanced in ticks.

As each tick has a different liquidity depth, the corresponding pricing function x * y = k also won’t be the same!

Each tick has its own liquidity depth. Image source: https://uniswap.org/blog/uniswap-v3/

Mmm… examples are always helpful for abstract descriptions 😂

Say the original pricing function is 100(x) * 1000(y) = 100000(k), with the price of X token 1000 / 100 = 10 and we’re now in the price range [9.08, 11.08].

If the liquidity of the price range [11.08, 13.08] is the same as [9.08, 11.08], we don’t have to modify the pricing function if the price goes from 10 to 11.08, which is the boundary between two ticks.

The price of X is 1052.63 / 95 = 11.08 when the equation is 1052.63 * 95 = 100000.

However, if the liquidity of the price range [11.08, 13.08] is two times that of the current range [9.08, 11.08], balances of x and y should be doubled, which makes the equation become 2105.26 * 220 = 400000, which is (1052.63 * 2) * (110 * 2) = (100000 * 2 * 2).

We can observe the following two points from the above example:

Trades always follow the pricing function x * y = k, while once the price crosses the current price range/tick, the liquidity/equation has to be updated.

√(x * y) = √k = L is how we represent the liquidity, as I say the liquidity of x * y = 400000 is two times the liquidity of x * y = 100000, as √(400000 / 100000) = 2.

What’s more, compared to liquidity on v1 & v2 is always spread across [0,∞], liquidity on v3 can be concentrated within certain price ranges and thus results in higher capital efficiency from traders’ swapping fees!

Let’s say if I provide liquidity in the range [1200, 2800], the capital efficiency will then be 4.24x higher than v2 with the range [0,∞] 😮😮😮 There’s a capital efficiency comparison calculator, make sure to try it out!

Image source: https://uniswap.org/blog/uniswap-v3/

It’s worth noticing that the concept of concentrated liquidity was proposed and already implemented by Kyper, prior to Uniswap, which is called Automated Price Reserve in their case.⁵

⁶ Thanks to Yenwen Feng for the information.

4. Range orders: reversible limit orders

As explained in the above section, LPs of v3 can provide liquidity to any price range/tick at their wish. Depending on the current price and the targeted price range, there are three scenarios:

current price < the targeted price range

current price > the targeted price range

current price belongs to the targeted price range

The first two scenarios are called range orders. They have unique characteristics and are essentially fee-earning reversible limit orders, which will be explained later.

The last case is the exact same liquidity providing mechanism as the previous versions: LPs provide liquidity in both tokens of the same value (= amount * price).

There’s also an identical product to the case: grid trading, a very powerful investment tool for a time of consolidation. Dunno what’s grid trading? Check out Binance’s explanation on this, as this topic won’t be covered!

In fact, LPs of Uniswap v1 & v2 are grid trading with a range of [0,∞] and the entry price as the baseline.

Range orders

To understand range orders, we’d have to first revisit how price is discovered on Uniswap with the equation x * y = k, for x & y stand for the amount of two tokens X and Y and k as a constant.

The price of X compared to Y is y / x, which means how many Y one can get for 1 unit of X, and vice versa the price of Y compared to X is x / y.

For the price of X to go up, y has to increase and x decrease.

With this pricing mechanism in mind, it’s example time!

Say an LP plans to place liquidity in the price range [15.625, 17.313], higher than the current price of X 10, when 100(x) * 1000(y) = 100000(k).

The price of X is 1250 / 80 = 15.625 when the equation is 80 * 1250 = 100000.

The price of X is 1315.789 / 76 = 17.313 when the equation is 76 * 1315.789 = 100000.

If now the price of X reaches 15.625, the only way for the price of X to go even higher is to further increase y and decrease x, which means exchanging a certain amount of X for Y.

Thus, to provide liquidity in the range [15.625, 17.313], an LP needs only to prepare 80 — 76 = 4 of X. If the price exceeds 17.313, all 4 X of the LP is swapped into 1315.789 — 1250 = 65.798 Y, and then the LP has nothing more to do with the pool, as his/her liquidity is drained.

What if the price stays in the range? It’s exactly what LPs would love to see, as they can earn swapping fees for all transactions in the range! Also, the balance of X will swing between [76, 80] and the balance of Y between [1250, 1315.789].

This might not be obvious, but the example above shows an interesting insight: if the liquidity of one token is provided, only when the token becomes more valuable will it be exchanged for the less valuable one.

…wut? 🤔

Remember that if 4 X is provided within [15.625, 17.313], only when the price of X goes up from 15.625 to 17.313 is 4 X gradually swapped into Y, the less valuable one!

What if the price of X drops back immediately after reaching 17.313? As X becomes less valuable, others are going to exchange Y for X.

The below image illustrates the scenario of DAI/USDC pair with a price range of [1.001, 1.002] well: the pool is always composed entirely of one token on both sides of the tick, while in the middle 1.001499⁶ is of both tokens.

Image source: https://uniswap.org/blog/uniswap-v3/

Similarly, to provide liquidity in a price range < current price, an LP has to prepare a certain amount of Y for others to exchange Y for X within the range.

To wrap up such an interesting feature, we know that:

Only one token is required for range orders.

Only when the current price is within the range of the range order can LP earn trading fees. This is the main reason why most people believe LPs of v3 have to monitor the price more actively to maximize their income, which also means that LPs of v3 have become arbitrageurs 🤯

I will be discussing more the impacts of v3 in 5. Impacts of v3.

⁷ 1.001499988 = √(1.0001 * 1.0002) is the geometric mean of 1.0001 and 1.0002. The implication is that the geometric mean of two prices is the average execution price within the range of the two prices.

Reversible limit orders

As the example in the last section demonstrates, if there is 4 X in range [15.625, 17.313], the 4 X will be completely converted into 65.798 Y when the price goes over 17.313.

We all know that a price can stay in a wide range such as [10, 11] for quite some time, while it’s unlikely so in a narrow range such as [15.625, 15.626].

Thus, if an LP provides liquidity in [15.625, 15.626], we can expect that once the price of X goes over 15.625 and immediately also 15.626, and does not drop back, all X are then forever converted into Y.

The concept of having a targeted price and the order will be executed after the price is crossed is exactly the concept of limit orders! The only difference is that if the range of a range order is not narrow enough, it’s highly possible that the conversion of tokens will be reverted once the price falls back to the range.

As price ranges follow the equation p(i) = 1.0001 ^ i, the range can be quite narrow and a range order can thus effectively serve as a limit order:

When i = 27490, 1.0001²⁷⁴⁹⁰ = 15.6248.⁸

When i = 27491, 1.0001²⁷⁴⁹¹ = 15.6264.⁸

A range of 0.0016 is not THAT narrow but can certainly satisfy most limit order use cases!

⁸ As mentioned previously in note #4, there is a square root in the equation of the price and index, thus the numbers here are for explantion only.

5. Impacts of v3

Higher capital efficiency, LPs become arbitrageurs… as v3 has made tons of radical changes, I’d like to summarize my personal takes of the impacts of v3:

Higher capital efficiency makes one of the most frequently considered indices in DeFi: TVL, total value locked, becomes less meaningful, as 1$ on Uniswap v3 might have the same effect as 100$ or even 2000$ on v2.

The ease of spot exchanging between spot exchanges used to be a huge advantage of spot markets over derivative markets. As LPs will take up the role of arbitrageurs and arbitraging is more likely to happen on v3 itself other than between DEXs, this gap is narrowed … to what extent? No idea though.

LP strategies and the aggregation of NFT of Uniswap v3 liquidity token are becoming the blue ocean for new DeFi startups: see Visor and Lixir. In fact, this might be the turning point for both DeFi and NFT: the two main reasons of blockchain going mainstream now come to the alignment of interest: solving the $$ problem 😏😏😏

In the right venue, which means a place where transaction fees are low enough, such as Optimism, we might see Algo trading firms coming in to share the market of designing LP strategies on Uniswap v3, as I believe Algo trading is way stronger than on-chain strategies or DAO voting to add liquidity that sort of thing.

After reading this article by Parsec.finance: The Dex to Rule Them All, I cannot help but wonder: maybe there is going to be centralized crypto exchanges adopting v3’s approach. The reason is that since orders of LPs in the same tick are executed pro-rata, the endless front-running speeding-competition issue in the Algo trading world, to some degree, is… solved? 🤔

Anyway, personal opinions can be biased and seriously wrong 🙈 I’m merely throwing out a sprat to catch a whale. Having a different voice? Leave your comment down below!

6. Conclusion

That was kinda tough, isn’t it? Glad you make it through here 🥂🥂🥂

There are actually many more details and also a huge section of Oracle yet to be covered. However, since this article is more about features and targeting normal DeFi users, I’ll leave those to the next one; hope there is one 😅

If you have any doubt or find any mistake, please feel free to reach out to me and I’d try to reply AFAP!

Stay tuned and in the meantime let’s wait and see how Uniswap v3 is again pioneering the innovation of DeFi 🌟

Uniswap v3 Features Explained in Depth was originally published in Taipei Ethereum Meetup on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

👏 歡迎轉載分享鼓掌

Fashion Summit (HK) 時尚高峰(香港) 2020
Design for the Future: "Fashion Incubation" Seminar
設計未來︰「培育新世代時裝設計」研討會

9:40-9:45 Welcome Remarks
Mr. Alexander Chan, The Mills Fabrica

9:45-9:50 Opening Speech by Guest of Honour
Dr. Chan Pak Li, Bernard, JP
Under Secretary for Commerce & Economic Development, HKSAR Government

10:00-11:15 Panel Discussion I:
How can Fashion Incubation Programmes Help Youngsters & Start-up?
Ms. Kennis Chan, Hong Kong Design Centre
Mr. Leo Chan, Fashion Farm Foundation
Ms. Maggie Luk, The Mills Fabrica
Ms. Morgane Parizot, Redress
Moderator:
Ms. Catherin Cole, CEO of MOTIF

11:15-12:30 Panel Discussion II:
How I start up with Incubation Programme?
Fashion Designers:
Mr. Jesse Lee
Ms. Debbie Leung
Mr. Angus Tsui
Mr. Yeung Chin
Moderator:
Prof. Philip Yeung Kwok-wing, Executive Director of CITA

14:30-16:00 Panel Discussion III:
Fashion Design First Experience 時裝設計初體驗
Winners of “MY STAGE - Inter-School Fashion Design Competition”
Moderator:
Ms. Stella Lee, Executive Director of Global Group Securities Ltd.
Ms. Celia Wong, Sales & Marketing Director of Wing Yuen Group Company Ltd.
Prof. Thomas C. C. Wong, Certified Sustainable Development Planner

University of Kent, Fine Art Degree Show,
21st – 31st May –2015

An exhibition of 26 exciting emerging artists in Kent

The University of Kent’s School of Music and Fine Art presents the Fine Art Degree Show 2016 in the extraordinary environment of The Historic Dockyard, Chatham, Kent, featuring the work of 26 graduating BA and MA Fine Art students.

Opening with a preview on Saturday May 21st, 1pm-5pm,
with guest speaker, Patricia Bickers, writer, curator and editor of Art Monthly
and music from artist Benedict Drew.

The exhibition is open to all and is free to attend.

Open to the public (10am-5pm):
Sunday 22nd May
Tuesday 24th May - Tuesday 31st May inclusive.

Continuing a tradition of showcasing bold, exploratory exhibitions curated by the University of Kent’s Fine Art students, framed by the stunning backdrop of one of the country’s most iconic locations, the Historic Dockyard Chatham, our visitors will encounter a broad range of artistic styles and media, an explosion of imagination and a celebration of art’s potential for society.

This exhibition offers the public a fascinating insight into contemporary art’s most recent practices and processes such as a ‘Grand Design’ home evolved by a hoarder, an oozing conversation with the earth, a system of tunnels, angry letters about Gillingham’s Samurai sent to Medway council, a Dockyard worker’s fall down a well as sculpture, personal Facebook data becomes food, a dream-like exploration of the car industry, hand movements translated into Fibonacci sound, an autobiographical feature length film made on a mobile phone and a performance where the rules of tennis are applied to an exam.

The Degree Show’s aim is to encourage audiences to explore the potential of Medway as a dynamic hub for art, with the School of Music and Fine Art as a major conduit for these activities, positively impacting on the community and offering imaginative suggestions and visionary strategies for cultural regeneration.

As well as involving students from Kent, and across the UK, this year’s Degree Show exhibitors include student artists from Iran, Thailand, China, Russia, Italy, Cyprus, Mexico, Hong Kong, Isle of Man and Ghana.

The Fine Art Degree Show exhibition catalogue features texts by academics across a range of University of Kent Schools: Emily Rosamond, Grant Pooke, Simon Smith, Howard Griffin and Rebecca Hobbs.
Degree Show visitors can attend a wide range of exciting educational activities. Young people attending can also participate in workshops with some of the exhibiting artists. On Tuesday 24h May and Wednesday 25th May Education Days will be held for local schools and colleges. Attendees will be able to view the Show and hear talks from the artists; they will also be encouraged to produce their own artwork in response to their experience of the Show. If you would like to bring a school, college or university group to this event (all ages welcome) please email mfaadmissions@kent.ac.uk
Visitors to the Degree Show will also be able to visit the Historic Dockyard's thematic exhibition of international contemporary art works, "Of the Sea," a competition (in collaboration with the School of Music and Fine Art) whose jury panel includes Kathleen Palmer (Head of Art, Imperial War Museum), and Victoria Pomery (Director of Turner Contemporary, Margate).
http://www.thedockyard.co.uk/plan/events/art-dockyard/

The Degree Show Address:
The Historic Dockyard, Chatham, Kent, ME4 4TY
Entry is at The Historic Dockyard Chatham Visitor Entrance, via The Galvanising Shop (next to the Dockyard’s visitors’ car park on the East Road).
http://www.thedockyard.co.uk/plan/how-find-us


Contact Details:
For further press information and images of the works on display please contact School Reception:
MFAReception@kent.ac.uk
or telephone 01634 888 980.
www.kent.ac.uk/smfa
Twitter: @unikentmfa
Twitter: https://twitter.com/UoKDegreeShow
Tumblr http://degreeshow2016.tumblr.com/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/degreeshow2016/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Uokdegreeshow/

The School of Music and Fine Art was rated within the top ten of Art university departments in the UK (Guardian League Tables, 2015) an accolade supported by a top 20 University which came 3rd for ‘overall satisfaction’ in the National Student Survey, 2014

All members of the Fine Art academic staff are actively engaged as nationally and internationally exhibiting artists and published writers and include Shona Illingworth, Sarah Turner, Dr Andrew Conio, Emily Rosamund, Adam Chodzko, Tim Meacham and Dr Steve Klee.

We have links with many leading arts organisations including; Whitstable Biennale and Turner Contemporary, Margate. We actively engage with collaborations and participation with our local community in Medway.

The department attracts students from all over the world and from a diverse range of backgrounds and experience.

:::::第十二屆北區舞展:::::
North Taiwan Dance Competition 12th
一年一度的大專院校街舞賽事
包含了從苗栗以北至宜蘭的所有大專院校齊聚一堂

●時間：12/5(六) 13:00觀眾入場 13:30活動開始

●地點：台北大學民生校區育樂館(民生東路三段67號)
※捷運中山國中站出站後，右轉沿復興北路直行至民生東路再右轉步行十分鐘 http://g.co/maps/u2gty

●Judge陣容：
SEVEN（SOUL BROTHERS）
ALUMI（LUMI DANCE SCHOOL）
小黑（MASK & DA RUMOUS）
雪球（STREET MONSTER）
泓龍（STEADY POINT ）

●職團表演：
Subway / Let's Boogie / 小少女

●主持人：
黃建(Power Jien)

＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
【北區舞展比賽辦法】

1。新增制度：
為提升各隊隊伍競爭水準，今年開始增加名次積分制，依各隊伍所獲得的名次，可決定該隊伍獲得積分高低，積分間距如下：
►第一名到第十名的隊伍得"2"分
►第十一名到第二十名的隊伍得"1"分
►第二十一名到第三十名的隊伍得"0"分
►未參加今年北區舞展的北區學校均可獲得"1"分。
積分則可「優先決定」明年報名先後順序，明年主辦單位將優先受理積分高的隊伍報名；若積分相同則看資料送達主辦的時間，先送達則先 受理，額滿則一概不受理；遞補學校遞補方法同上。
另外，每年積分「於報名成功後重新歸零」，不累加。
※今年報名仍不受積分影響，今年之比賽積分留至明年報名始生效力。
2。音樂限制：五分鐘以內
※超過五分鐘直接退件拒收
3。參賽條件：
參賽者只限「在校學生」，當天各校參賽者請務必攜帶有「該年度註冊章之學生證」報到
4。評分標準：
●舞蹈70% (包含舞技、隊型、整齊度、默契等)
●整體創意20%(包含動作創意、服裝造型）
●音樂10%
5。舞台規定：
●不需繳交燈光表 (為要求比賽公平性)
●禁止事先準備的大型道具(以不影響其他參賽者為主)
●禁止弄濕舞台
●道具/垃圾須於5分鐘表演時間內全部撤完，不得影響後面參賽者

＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊

◆北區舞展粉絲專頁
https://www.facebook.com/NorthTaiwanPopdanceUnion
◆第12屆北區舞展官方社團(參賽學校才需加入)
https://www.facebook.com/groups/948179828599341/

◎主辦單位：台北大學熱舞社第15屆
◎協辦單位：台北大學熱舞社第17屆
◎贊助單位：台灣之星/雪山啤酒/康和證券
◎商品贊助：台灣農畜/DaMove/98分/(待補)
◎燈光音響：邢懷碩
◎動態攝影：REBEL DESIGN、艾爾斯白有限公司
◎靜態攝影：轉轉影像shift studio

【聯絡資訊】
★總召 ：
Leo (fb: Leo Kersy )
★副召 ：
李國均 (fb: 李國均 )
張之馨 (fb: 張之馨 )

※主辦單位保留所有內容與規則的最後修改權利。

:::::第十二屆北區舞展:::::
North Taiwan Dance Competition 12th
一年一度的大專院校街舞賽事
包含了從苗栗以北至宜蘭的所有大專院校齊聚一堂

●時間：12/5(六) 13:00觀眾入場 13:30活動開始

●地點：台北大學民生校區育樂館(民生東路三段67號)
※捷運中山國中站出站後，右轉沿復興北路直行至民生東路再右轉步行十分鐘 http://g.co/maps/u2gty

●Judge陣容：
SEVEN（SOUL BROTHERS）
ALUMI（LUMI DANCE SCHOOL）
小黑（MASK & DA RUMOUS）
雪球（STREET MONSTER）
泓龍（STEADY POINT ）

●職團表演：
Subway / Let's Boogie / 小少女

●主持人：
黃建(Power Jien)

＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
【北區舞展比賽辦法】

1。新增制度：
為提升各隊隊伍競爭水準，今年開始增加名次積分制，依各隊伍所獲得的名次，可決定該隊伍獲得積分高低，積分間距如下：
►第一名到第十名的隊伍得"2"分
►第十一名到第二十名的隊伍得"1"分
►第二十一名到第三十名的隊伍得"0"分
►未參加今年北區舞展的北區學校均可獲得"1"分。
積分則可「優先決定」明年報名先後順序，明年主辦單位將優先受理積分高的隊伍報名；若積分相同則看資料送達主辦的時間，先送達則先 受理，額滿則一概不受理；遞補學校遞補方法同上。
另外，每年積分「於報名成功後重新歸零」，不累加。
※今年報名仍不受積分影響，今年之比賽積分留至明年報名始生效力。
2。音樂限制：五分鐘以內
※超過五分鐘直接退件拒收
3。參賽條件：
參賽者只限「在校學生」，當天各校參賽者請務必攜帶有「該年度註冊章之學生證」報到
4。評分標準：
●舞蹈70% (包含舞技、隊型、整齊度、默契等)
●整體創意20%(包含動作創意、服裝造型）
●音樂10%
5。舞台規定：
●不需繳交燈光表 (為要求比賽公平性)
●禁止事先準備的大型道具(以不影響其他參賽者為主)
●禁止弄濕舞台
●道具/垃圾須於5分鐘表演時間內全部撤完，不得影響後面參賽者

＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊

◆北區舞展粉絲專頁
https://www.facebook.com/NorthTaiwanPopdanceUnion
◆第12屆北區舞展官方社團(參賽學校才需加入)
https://www.facebook.com/groups/948179828599341/

◎主辦單位：台北大學熱舞社第15屆
◎協辦單位：台北大學熱舞社第17屆
◎贊助單位：台灣之星/雪山啤酒/康和證券
◎商品贊助：台灣農畜/DaMove/98分/(待補)
◎燈光音響：邢懷碩
◎動態攝影：REBEL DESIGN、艾爾斯白有限公司
◎靜態攝影：轉轉影像shift studio

【聯絡資訊】
★總召 ：
Leo (fb: Leo Kersy )
★副召 ：
李國均 (fb: 李國均 )
張之馨 (fb: 張之馨 )

※主辦單位保留所有內容與規則的最後修改權利。