關於 scientific mystery ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

#好書推介 #新加坡教育圖書
#文尾Giveaway #送出五套英文圖書
（FB選出3位得獎者，IG選出2位得獎者）

#StoryTime 又為屋企增添圖書的時候，今次想介紹的是World Scirnetific 新加坡的教育圖書，一直都是我們比較少接觸到。

除了在家與玩樂之外，少不了就是閱讀，以茶兄妹的年齡，由爸爸伴讀就更加正🥰新加坡的教育圖書擁有不同範疇：繪本、科學、實驗等等，我自己就離不開本《The Happy Learning Book for siblings》，好多親子在家遊戲可以玩，值得學習❤️

茶妹最愛看《MEME the MONKEY Wins in Life》，無限次要我們講給她聽，當中故事讓大人小朋友反思何謂成功💪🏻🥰茶茶就超鍾意《The Young Scientists Series》，入面包含12本不同科學題目，如《The amazing quantam》、《The mystery of natures‘s laws》等等，果然男孩子都愛玩這類型素材🤣🤣

🥳現在我們讀者購買書籍，有八折優惠😍😍

輸入育茶手記專屬優惠碼：WSCHILDREN6 即享有八折優惠😍😍😍
優惠截止：2021年4月17日
還不快點瘋狂買書🥰🥰🥰

Link🔗：https://www.hkbookcity.com/searchbook3.php?key=book_group&keyword=worldscientific2021&startnum=1

【#Giveaway】多謝World Scientific Education送出五套圖書給我們讀者🥰🥰
（我們會選出FB得獎者3位、IG得獎者2位）

Giveaway圖書（圖在最尾的照片）包括：
《MEME the MONKEY Wins in Life》、《Did you hear that？》、《Brave Beachley》和《Under The Stars》
一共送出五套（每套包含以上四本圖書）哦

1）Like & Follow World Scientific Publishing Co. 和 @育茶手記 Facebook🥰

2）Follow IG：lemoncha_meimei & @worldscientificedu

IG Giveaway Link：https://www.instagram.com/p/CLbxcAzDubY/?igshid=1cj6ym74oeei4 （參加兩邊增加中獎機會）

3）Like 和公開share此post

4）留言處留言，「#StoryTime新加坡教育圖書」並tag 5位朋友

截止日期：2月26日
Giveaway圖書將由World Scientific Education寄出🥰🥰
*育茶手記保留一切決定權*

#親子閱讀時間 #親子 #爸爸陪讀 #英文圖書 #reading

被撤回的文章，英文版如下，please Share to your network.
The English version of Prof Yuen and Prof Lung's article is already available: 👇🏻

18 Mar 2020: David Christopher Lung, Yuen Kwok-yung: Pandemic Originated from Wuhan; Lesson from 17 Years Ago Forsaken

Winter of Jihai (2019), a virus began in Wuhan. Comes spring of Gengzi (2020), an epidemic broke out in Hubei. Within China, there were 80,000 confirmed cases, and 3,000 deaths. People were confined in their homes and the epidemic only began slowing down towards the end of the month, yet the virus had leaked to the world outside before it could be stopped. In March, it was a pandemic, only it was announced too late by the World Health Organization (WHO). Countries lacked measures and reserves, and the pandemic swept across the globe. Singapore, Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan were spared from the pandemic with continuous sprinkles of overseas imported cases and small groups, but have not yet fallen.

This pandemic came from a virus, shaped like a corona, hence named Coronavirus. Since 2015, WHO has avoided using names of people, places, animals, food, culture, occupation, etc., to name illnesses. For this one, the “year” was used for differentiation, COVID-19. In the naming of viruses, International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) analyses only the genome sequencing meticulously and disregards the other aspects. Since the genome sequence of this Coronavirus was “not novel enough”, it belongs in the same sisterhood with the SARS Coronavirus, also known as SARS 2.0 (SARS-CoV-2). Local and international media call it the Wuhan Coronavirus or Wuhan Pneumonia, simple and straight-forward, which is not incorrect.

Much controversy has resulted in society regarding the name of this pandemic. In fact, the illness was named by WHO, while the virus was named by ICTV. Nicknames are conventional, as long as they are clear and understood. In scientific discussions or academic exchanges, COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2 must be used. In daily public communications or media wordings, Wuhan Coronavirus or Wuhan Pneumonia are both conventional, easy to understand, and great for communication purposes.

The Pandemic of Gengzi, an Origin in Wuhan

Around 75% of the newly discovered infectious diseases originated from wild animals. Among the few that could infect mammals is the Coronavirus, whose ancestral virus originated from bats or avians. Both have the ability to fly thousands of miles to the place the virus was first discovered, therefore the naming of a virus would also include its place of origin. To investigate the origin of a virus, the correct and objective way is to isolate the virus from the animal host. Unfortunately, since Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market was eradicated early on, the wild animals in the market were already gone by the time researchers had arrived to collect samples. The identities of the natural host and the intermediate host became a mystery. According to the locals, the wild animals sold within the Market came from all over China, Southeast Asia, and Africa (smuggled) to be distributed from there. The ancestral virus of the Wuhan Coronavirus cannot be determined.

Using genome sequencing to determine its origin, a bat Coronavirus stand (RaTG13) was found to be extremely similar to the Wuhan Coronavirus, with a sequencing similarity of 96%, therefore it is believed to be the ancestral virus stand of this Wuhan Coronavirus. This particular virus strand was obtained and isolated from Yunnan bats (Rhinolophus sinicus), and bats are believed to be the natural host of this Wuhan Coronavirus. Epidemiology clearly indicated Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market as the amplification epicenter, where there was a huge possibility that the virus had cross-infected between the natural host and the intermediate host, and then mutated within the intermediate host to adapt to the human body, followed by human-to-human infections.

The identity of the intermediate host remains unknown, but genome sequencing indicated that the Spike Receptor-binding domain of the Wuhan Coronavirus has a 90% similarity to that of the pangolin Coronavirus strand. Although the pangolin could not be confirmed as the intermediate host, it is highly possible that this pangolin Coronavirus strand donated Spike Receptor-binding domain DNA (or even the entire sequence) to the bat Coronavirus strand. Though gene shuffling recombination, the novel Coronavirus was born.

Wild Animal Market, the Origin of Innumerable Viruses
The 2003 SARS virus originated from Heyuan, became an epidemic in Guangdong, and passed to Hong Kong. The SARS Coronavirus was found in civets, and China clearly banned the trading of wild animals afterward. 17 years on, the wild animal market has run amuck. The Chinese have outright forgotten the lessons from SARS and have allowed a live wild animal market to exist within the centre of a highly developed city, with wild animals being cooked and eaten in brought daylight – simply astonishing. The feces of the animals within a live wild animal market contain a large amount of germs and viruses. With a crowded environment, vile hygiene, and a mix of wild animal species, gene shuffling and mutation could easily occur in viruses, therefore these markets must be banned.

Reform of the wet markets should be a focus of epidemic prevention. The mainland Chinese and Hong Kong governments must quickly improve these environments by enhancing ventilation and pest control. Before the complete elimination of live-animal markets, animal feces must be well handled to minimise the chances of gene shuffling in viruses.

The online rumour that the virus originated from USA was absolutely groundless, delusional. Stop spreading the falsity before we expose ourselves to ridicule. To remain calm before a pandemic, informational transparency is of the utmost importance. With calm and objective analysis, refrain from parroting others and spreading hearsay. Not strictly enforcing the closure of all wild animal markets after SARS was a grave mistake. In order to defeat an illness, one must own up to the mistakes and face the truths. Stop committing the same mistakes and putting the blame onto others. The Wuhan Coronavirus was a product of the inferior culture of the Chinese people: excessive hunting and ingesting wild animals, inhumane treatment of animals, disrespecting lives. Continuing to devour wild animals for human desires, the deep-rooted bad habits of the Chinese people are the real origin of the virus. With this attitude, in a dozen years, SARS 3.0 is bound to happen.

(Dr Lung graduated in 2004 from the University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Medicine with distinction in Medicine. He currently works in the Hong Kong Children’s Hospital, where he built up the microbiology team and lab. Yuen Kwok-yung is a Professor and Chair of Infectious Diseases of the Department of Microbiology of the University of Hong Kong)

(Original image by Ming Pao)

https://news.mingpao.com/pns/%e8%a7%80%e9%bb%9e/article/20200318/s00012/1584470310596/%e9%be%8d%e6%8c%af%e9%82%a6-%e8%a2%81%e5%9c%8b%e5%8b%87-%e5%a4%a7%e6%b5%81%e8%a1%8c%e7%b7%a3%e8%b5%b7%e6%ad%a6%e6%bc%a2-%e5%8d%81%e4%b8%83%e5%b9%b4%e6%95%99%e8%a8%93%e7%9b%a1%e5%bf%98

一封給國家地理頻道「Dog: Impossible」節目負責人的公開信:

An open letter to the leadership team of Nat Geo Wild Dog Impossible:

Translate: Yu-Hwa Su 翻譯: 蘇昱華
Proof: Yen Ke 校對: 葛雁

The International Association of Animal Behavior Consultants (IAABC) applauds National Geographic’s mission to offer intelligent, relevant and captivating non-fiction entertainment. This is a crucial objective, especially as an introduction to children and viewers largely relying on television for their scientific information.
國際動物行為諮詢師協會（IAABC）對於國家地理頻道致力於提供電視觀眾正確知識與科學內容表示讚賞。這是一個非常重要的目標，特別是對依賴電視得到這些知識的兒童與其他觀眾們來說。

However, your stated mission is in direct conflict with your show Dog: Impossible. In fact, the irresponsible treatment of the dogs and people on this show flies in the face of all best practices in animal training and behavior. Rather than promoting science and scientifically-proven methodology, Dog: Impossible sacrifices learning science for more dramatic television.
然而，貴頻道所提供的節目「Dog: Impossible」卻與貴頻道「提供正確的科學知識」的一貫立場衝突。節目中對犬隻以及飼主的不負責處理方式與應有的動物訓練及行為操作的準則相違背。「Dog: Impossible」並沒有提倡科學以及經科學驗證的方法，這節目犧牲了對科學的學習，轉而追求吸睛的電視節目效果。

Matt Beisner appears to have no credentials or education in training and behavior, yet he refers to himself as a behaviorist. His claim that “energy is the one language that every animal on the planet speaks” makes clear he is not one.
Matt Beisner並沒有動物訓練或行為學的相關學習經歷與證照，卻宣稱自己是一位行為學家。從他的主張：「能量是地球上所有動物都會使用的共通語言」，便能明白他並不是行為學家。

His statement, “You don’t need tricks, you don’t need treats, you don’t need force,” shows just how unaware of his own actions he is. His misuse of scientific terminology leads viewers to believe they are learning demonstrated, safe and accepted strategies in helping their dogs. In fact, Mr. Beisner is forcing these dogs from start to finish of each episode. His own “tricks” are that of over-stressing dogs until they’re in a state referred to in psychology and science as “learned helplessness.”
他主張「你不需要技巧、零食、或蠻力 (去訓練狗)」，這顯示出他對於自己的所做所為一無所知。他對科學術語的濫用也會誤導觀眾，讓觀眾以為他們正在學習經證實有效而且安全可接受的方法來幫助狗狗。但這位訓練師在每一集節目上從頭到尾都是在逼迫這些狗，而他所擁有的「技巧」，就是讓狗進入過度緊迫的狀態，直到牠們進入心理學和科學上所指的「習得無助」（learned helplessness）狀態。

Learned helplessness occurs when a subject endures repeated aversive stimuli beyond their control. Originally thought to show a subject's acceptance of their powerlessness, for more than half a century it’s been known instead to be the emotional “shutting down” of the subject. Anxiety, clinical depression, and related mental illnesses are common consequences of this technique in humans.
「習得無助」發生在動物沒有任何控制權，且重複地被施加嫌惡刺激的時候。最初，人們認為習得無助狀態意味著動物「接受」了自身無法改變、無能為力的情形，超過半個世紀以來，人們認為這是動物情緒「關機（shutting down）」的表現。在人類身上，習得無助的常見結果包含焦慮、憂鬱症、以及相關的心理疾病。

Allow us to note some aspects of the trailer and his shows, but first, to point out a few well-documented and commonly understood aspects of dog behavior so that we may better make our points understood.
在我們解釋為何我們認為此節目的預告片與內容不適當之前，我們希望先闡述一些正確的犬隻行為常識，以便您能更理解我們的觀點。

Canine body language indicating stress and severe stress:
顯示出壓力以及嚴重緊迫的犬隻肢體語言：

Compressed bodies
Dry, raspy panting
Wide, open eyes with dilated pupils
Heavy drooling
“Whipping” head and body back, pushing off a handler in order to get away
Growling
Fighting
Biting
縮緊身體
急促的喘氣
睜大雙眼、散瞳
大量流口水
甩頭、用前爪推抱著狗的人以退後、試圖掙脫
低吼
打架
開咬

Eleven seconds into the trailer, Mr. Beisner rubs his hands together, smiling, and says, “This is going to be gnarly.” All professionals know from that statement what the series will spotlight: A poorly (if at all) educated non-professional pushing dogs way beyond therapeutic limits, in the name of “results.”
在預告片11秒的地方，Beisner先生搓手並笑著說「等一下會很精采喔」。所有專業人士都知道這句話代表這個節目的亮點將會是：一名缺乏適當教育的訓練師，逼迫狗到超過其能承受的極限，並把這樣的結果稱為是良好的改善。

Flooding, the term for inundating a subject with their fears, phobias and triggers, is ethically questionable at best, cruel and unnecessary, always. There's also a common danger of spontaneous recovery of the phobia. This is because flooding doesn't replace the fear-response with a different response, it just replaces it with no response. “No response” is simply suppression, not cure.
「洪水法」，指的是故意將動物置於恐慌或恐懼的觸發刺激情境，這樣的方法不道德、殘忍、而且沒必要。另外，恐懼的自發性回復（spontaneous recovery）也是洪水法常見的風險，這是因為洪水法並沒有將害怕的反應重新制約成其他不同的情緒行為，它只是讓動物沒有反應。「沒有反應」只是壓抑，動物並沒有因此感到不害怕或恐慌。

Throughout the trailer dogs are flooded with aversive stimuli such as other dogs, people and equipment, something an ethical professional would not, and could not do per any answerable guidelines of animal training and behavior care.
在整個預告片中，狗狗被迫接受各種嫌惡刺激的洪水法訓練，例如其他狗、其他人類和物品，這是具有道德的專業訓練人員不會做的，任何負責任的動物訓練及行為照護準則也不會如此建議。

Systematic desensitization and counterconditioning, gradual exposure to the feared object, and replacement of a negative emotional association with a more pleasant one, are the recommended techniques used to treat such fear and aggression cases, per all legitimate veterinary, training and behavior organizations.
系統性減敏與反制約，也就是逐步與少量的讓狗接觸其本來會害怕的事物，並且將引發的少量負面情緒與其非常喜愛的事物配對給予，是用來處理恐懼及攻擊案例的建議方法，也是每個好的獸醫師、訓練及行為機構會推薦的方法。

Beisner’s statement that “We know at the Zen Yard that dogs help other dogs come out of their shell and face their fear and get past their aggression” isn’t just scientifically unsupportable, his words ring hollow during the very scene playing while he says those words: Beisner restraining one dog, while his co-host pulls a leashed dog to the first in a completely unnatural gesture perhaps intended to either mimic natural dog greeting (it doesn’t) or to flood the heavily drooling dog who is unable to move or get away. The dogs end up in a fight. They have been set up to fail, and the outcome is inevitable.
Beisner宣稱「我們在Zen Yard（他的訓練中心）知道狗會去幫助其他狗融入外界、面對牠們的恐懼並且克服攻擊行為」，這句話不只是缺乏科學支持，在影片中他講出這句話時搭配的畫面，亦表現出他的說詞缺乏支持：Beisner限制了第一隻狗的行動，由節目的共同主持人以牽繩將另一隻狗以一個完全不自然的姿勢拉到第一隻狗身邊，他們可能是在試著模仿狗狗自然的社交打招呼行為（但並不是），或使用洪水法訓練那隻狂流口水（顯示牠很緊張）並且無法逃脫的狗。最終兩隻狗打起來，訓練師製造的這個情境，讓失敗的結果無可避免。

In the trailer, the assistant host, Stefanie DiOrio, states, “Nervousness can easily turn to fear which can lead to aggression.” This is an accurate statement, which is why it’s so confusing that the entire show would be predicated on pushing dogs to the very edge of survivable stress and into predictable aggression, doubling down on the issues that their owners are struggling with.
在預告片中，節目的共同主持人Stefanie DiOrio說「緊張不安很容易變成真正的恐懼，並且導致攻擊行為」，這句話是正確的，但也讓人更加困惑為何整個節目的走向都在將狗推向牠們所能承受壓力的極限、觸發根本可預測的攻擊行為、並使飼主所面對的問題加倍惡化。

We know that the dramatic changes in behavior, from stressed and wildly aggressive to “calm” dogs, make for compelling TV. To an average pet owner it looks like these dogs are making huge improvements. All clients just want their dog to “Stop being aggressive.” However, we also know that behavior suppression is not the same as behavior modification, that a stressed and shut-down dog is a more dangerous animal than one who is actively showing aggression, and that the long-term prognosis of this kind of intervention is poor for both the client and their dog.
我們知道行為上戲劇性的變化，從一隻緊迫且兇猛攻擊的狗轉變成“冷靜”的狗，這個過程代表了高收視率，在不十分了解行為學的飼主眼中看來，這些狗狗似乎有巨大的進步。飼主都只是希望他們的狗「不要再有攻擊性」，然而我們也知道單純抑制攻擊行為的出現，並不是真正的行為改善技術。舉例來說一隻高壓力但看似沒有反應的狗，遠比一隻會表現出攻擊性的狗要危險許多 (譯註: 因為這樣的狗可能會沒有徵兆地開咬)，因此這種抑制攻擊行為的訓練法，以長遠來看對飼主以及狗狗都是有害的。

It is also worth pointing out that, like his predecessor, Mr Beisner’s assessment of cause for much of the issues he’s asked to address is simple, made especially clear in episode 4 where he not only saves a dog, he “saves a marriage:” Women are unable to effectively lead, must be stronger, must change their ways.
另一個值得注意的事是Beisner先生，如同他在同一個頻道的前輩，西薩，對導致問題的原因評估也過於簡化，例如第四集中他聲稱他不只拯救了狗狗，他還「拯救了這段婚姻」，因為女主人無法有效的領導狗狗，因此她必須更堅強，必須改變他們之間的相處模式。

Misogyny, it seems, cures dog behavior problems. Real exploration and explanation regarding the antecedents and consequences around behaviors are ignored in favor of client blaming.
這段貶抑女性的解釋，看起來似乎能改善犬隻的行為問題，然而關於行為問題真正的前因後果卻被指責客戶所取代，並沒有真正的被探討與解釋。

The clients on the show represent thousands of clients throughout the US and beyond with whom we work every day, helping them to help their dogs. Far from being dogs “other people won’t work with,” the dogs on your show are exactly the clients and dogs that IAABC Certified Dog Behavior Consultants, as well as all members of the American College of Veterinary Behaviorists, Certified Applied Animal Behaviorists, and other certified behavior specialists see and successfully work with every day.
節目中所出現的客戶正代表了我們日常工作中所會幫助的人們與他們的狗，呈現的就是我們在美國跟其他國家的上千位客戶。節目中所出現的這些有著行為問題的狗絕對不是「其他訓練師都不想要處理的狗狗」，事實上這些客戶與狗正是IAABC認證的狗行為諮詢師、美國獸醫行為學家、認證的應用動物行為學家或是其他受認證的行為學專家，每天工作的日常。

We do so using the best practices of our field (see https://m.iaabc.org/about/ethics/), adopted by the leading behavior and training organizations, without psychologically or physically harming the animals we work with.
我們在這個領域也使用最嚴謹的訓練師專業道德守則（英文版參見https://m.iaabc.org/about/ethics/，中文版參見https://reurl.cc/72eVkl），這個守則受領先的行為及訓練機構所採用，使訓練師與行為諮詢師在工作時，不對我們經手的動物造成生理或心理上的傷害。

The IAABC urges Nat Geo WILD to stop promoting this public miseducation. The tactics employed in the name of entertainment are unnecessarily harsh and potentially dangerous to the public, and they teach yet another generation of Nat Geo watchers absolutely incorrect and harmful practices.
IAABC呼籲國家地理頻道（Nat Geo WILD）停止傳播此系列誤導公眾的資訊。以娛樂包裝節目的策略對於觀眾是不必要的粗糙而且有潛在風險的，甚至是向頻道的年輕一代觀眾灌輸完全不正確且有害的做法。

It remains a mystery why your network is so intent on harming dogs. After years of Cesar Milan, to now bring in a man equally unskilled, who equates terrified, angry or entrapped dogs to his own addiction history is remarkable. Are we really satisfied conflating ego with compassion, self-focus with an understanding of animal behavior? Is this the “science” your mission stands for?
我們仍然不知為何貴頻道這麼多年來如此堅持持續傷害狗的這些作為。在西薩 (Cesar Milan) 的節目播映多年之後，現在又引進一個同樣缺乏正確訓練技巧，以自身藥物成癮困擾歷史去錯誤的同理恐懼或憤怒的狗的人。我們能接受一個膨脹自我，而非真正擁有同情心、適當自我聚焦、了解動物行為的「專業人士」嗎？這就是貴節目所宣稱的「科學」立場嗎？

The damage Nat Geo is doing to dogs by choosing this type of programming is astounding. We can only assume that the producers are unaware of this, as it’s hard to imagine such harm and cruelty would be deliberate.
國家地理頻道選擇製作這類節目對於狗狗的傷害甚鉅，我們只能假定節目製作人並沒有意識到這點，因為我們難以想像會有人故意去做這樣有害且殘忍的事情。

Would you show a reality program on heart surgery with a photogenic “self-taught” practitioner, simply stating the star was not a doctor before showing him mutilating a real patient?
想問貴節目是否會採用一個上鏡的“自學”外科醫生錄製心臟手術的實境節目，告知觀眾他並非真正的醫生，然後播放他對病患動刀的畫面？

I leave you with the clearest image of suffering and abuse from your trailer: the Aussie, stressed to the breaking point, thick ropes of drool streaming from its mouth, being choked by a slip lead to compensate for the host’s inability to even effectively muzzle a dog. This dog is at the point of collapse. This dog is being tortured, and that is not hysteria. That is an assessment by any educated measure.
作為結尾，我希望指出貴節目預告片中明確顯示出狗狗受苦或受虐的畫面：那隻澳洲牧羊犬已經瀕臨壓力的極限，您可以看到口水掛在其嘴邊 (大量口水為壓力徵兆)，口罩因為沒有確實的配戴而滑脫，導致牠被勒到快要窒息，已在崩潰邊緣。具備專業與適當教育的人員指出，這隻狗因在節目上被虐待而情緒崩潰，並非其本身歇斯底里。

Please stop this cruel and dangerous programming. To do otherwise is to support that self-taught heart surgery and all the consequences it would bring; that this show is currently bringing to families struggling with their dogs.
Professionals refer to Cesar Milan’s influence on dog training as “job security” because so many dogs ruined or made far worse by his teachings are brought to us by well-intentioned, often weeping owners desperate for real help. Often it is too late.
請停止這系列殘酷且危險的節目。否則貴節目就等同於支持前面舉例的自學的心臟外科「醫師」進行手術一樣，這些危險的後果正由觀眾與他們的狗承擔。專業訓犬人士將西薩米蘭對訓犬的影響戲稱為「工作保障」，因為太多飼主使用了他教授的技巧後，狗狗的狀況變得更糟，而哭著迫切尋找真正的協助，此時通常都為時已晚。

We do not want more work due to this same phenomenon.
我們不想要因為這個節目帶來類似影響而接到更多工作。

We’d be happy to provide you with any education and resources you need to inform your producers about what would qualify as responsible, effective, safe and thoughtful work with the same “red zone” dogs you sell so well.
但我們很樂意提供貴頻道任何需要的教育與資源，讓您們的節目製作人對訓犬工作應有的品質有所理解，例如負責、有效、安全，並且理解到對於在節目中出現的這些「危險」犬隻，事實上有更合理的訓練方法。

Thank you for your consideration.
謝謝您的閱讀與理解。

Marjie Alonso
Executive Director, IAABC
For the Board of Directors

Marjie Alonso
IAABC執行長
代表董事會發言

身近な科学シリーズ第112弾！
今回は、猫がなぜ背中から落ちてもくるりんぱと着地ができるのか？
この「猫ひねり」を角運動量・慣性モーメントなど科学的原理をわかりやすく解説！
それをもとに人間で実際にチャレンジしました！
300年もの謎でだった猫ひねり、果たして原理通り成功できるのか！？
乞うご期待！！

The 112th in our Familiar Science Series!
In this issue, why can a cat fall off its back and still be able to land with a twirler?
This "cat twist" is a simple explanation of scientific principles such as angular momentum and moment of inertia!
I actually challenged myself with a human based on that!
Can the cat-twist, which has been a mystery for 300 years, really succeed as a principle?
Please check it out!

★紹介映像：物理エンジンくん「ネコひねりを人間に学習させてみる」
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xQmXcmN4WY&t=95s
機械学習でキャラクターのびくんに猫ひねりをチャレンジさせてます！

★紹介映像：むにむに教授「猫はなぜ空中で向きを変えられる？」
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jo8UDM5Lq0Y
こちらも物理エンジンを使って猫ひねりの原理を紹介してます！

★Introductory Video：Slow Motion Flipping Cat Physics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RtWbpyjJqrU
海外でも猫ひねりの動画を紹介されてます！


全国各地にてサイエンスショー開催中！
開催スケジュールとご依頼はこちらまで＞＞http://www.denjiro.co.jp
米村でんじろうサイエンスショー＞＞https://youtu.be/m2_CcrSvZC8
弟子たちによるサイエンスショー＞＞https://youtu.be/lLs74id3bPo

米村でんじろうサイエンスプロダクション
Twitter https://twitter.com/YDScience
FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/denjiroscience/

チャーリー西村
Twitter https://twitter.com/charlie0401
ブログ https://ameblo.jp/charlie0719/entry-12393864192.html
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/nishimura.charlie

ジャイアン村上
Twitter https://twitter.com/wataru197804
ブログ https://ameblo.jp/wataru197804/entry-12405061755.html

海老谷 浩
Twitter https://twitter.com/EbichanScience
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100015778416010

今回の動画
監修：米村でんじろう
HP:http://www.denjiro.co.jp/
出演：米村でんじろう
　　　チャーリー西村
　　　ジャイアン村上
　　　海老谷浩(えびちゃん)
　　　石崎光理(イッシー)
編集：片田淑乃

使用音源・素材
DOVA-SYNDROME
https://dova-s.jp
H/MIX GALLERY
http://www.hmix.net/music_gallery/feeling/sadness.htm
Ucchii0-うっちーゼロ
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFCv_ygATNZLmIFkXxJBrrw
otologic
ポケットサウンド
https://pocket-se.info
DESIGNALIKIE
https://illustimage.com/

再生リスト
米村でんじろう
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhfyuvgO7UcYXRmV05g6RyOqN5a_4-6IA

チャーリー西村
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhfyuvgO7UcYDw9rBH4FoW8uky3mKOLRj

ジャイアン村上
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhfyuvgO7UcZgHENtbNlg-DG_aPAAOMp6

海老谷浩
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhfyuvgO7Ucbv3xau3TcN4U0mRGhcjOfl

身近な実験
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhfyuvgO7UcbRN-BDB7DoqbShpizNncvQ

科学マジック
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhfyuvgO7UcZOMlu_Z_DHitRHJnUDTKSB

エンタメ実験
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhfyuvgO7UcaBxhKucjCpuesgGEWyTKkO

お家でできる実験
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhfyuvgO7UcYvfVNLgRXlUCEGNlIqNAML

中高生向け実験
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhfyuvgO7UcacaTv5U4g8NgKSjbPjJv_3

小学生向け実験
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhfyuvgO7UcZSOFle6zIihkGPDND260IQ

サイエンスマジック
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhfyuvgO7Uca9GRrKQjS4eoxOJ5eUihDY

自由研究
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhfyuvgO7UcazaM3NXQnegNwqK0OT__P7

シャボン玉
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhfyuvgO7UcZ57rFpkC3LqjdfeNeVWHd8

金属の実験
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhfyuvgO7Ucbb13pm4wticnKzXz57gqgu

空気の実験
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhfyuvgO7UcbsR3Hdbtv98Zu8x6XXipu9

水の実験
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhfyuvgO7UcY75_GE_NVpOTw-9M6s8YDn

火の実験
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhfyuvgO7UcZlrCvZlZCCr6ZthhAiFWHT

工作
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhfyuvgO7Uca43K0sPk9GR1djCF2hn2uU


この動画で紹介・解説している実験および作業は危険をともなうものもあります。弊社はこの動画で紹介した実験に起因するいかなる損失、傷病、損傷に対しても一切の責任を負いません。自己の責任において安全に実験をおこなうようにしてください。
火を使う実験は必ず大人の人と一緒にやりましょう。
家の中のものを使うときは、お家の人に許可を取りましょう。
洗剤や薬品を使う場合は、説明書をしっかり読みましょう。
実験に使用したものは絶対に口に入れないようにしましょう。
この動画に記載の情報、および、弊社製品の著作権は米村でんじろうサイエンスプロダクションに帰属します。私的かつ非商業目的で使用する場合、著作権法により認められる場合を除き、事前に弊社による許可を受けずに、複製、公衆送信、改変、切除、実演等の行為は著作権法により禁止されています。
©YONEMURA DENJIRO SCIENCE PRODUCTION

千萬不要小看古代人的智慧。不少來自古代的有趣發明，因爲各種原因失去了製造方法，科學家絞盡腦汁都無法將它們還原。

如果你覺得這些內容不夠，還可以看看我的參考資料（最底）：⬇️

☛訂閱PowPow都市傳說、暗網、冷知識的頻道：https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTiPpo3GYFgLq0WrvwyLVYw?sub_confirmation=1

☛PowPow的Instagram：ProfPowPow

☛PowPow的Facebook：
https://www.facebook.com/ProfPowPow/

☛都市傳說、都市傳說真相系列（中文字幕）：
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYCvmttdLR8rROmJ4EDli5gw_FEmH1LJv

☛Deep Web 暗網系列（中文字幕）：https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYCvmttdLR8rINF94fqtQMAAtKNkVLjf0

Reference：
John Verhoeven: Mystery of Damascus Steel Swords Unveiled
https://www.mse.iastate.edu/news/john-verhoeven/

Decoding an Ancient Computer. Scientific American
https://dx.doi.org/10.1038%2Fscientificamerican1209-76

Archimedes Death Ray: October, 2005.
http://web.mit.edu/2.009/www/experiments/deathray/10_ArchimedesResult.html