最好的自己不在未來，就在現在。
認真回想，以前我好像在每一段關係中都是在扮演某一個角色，不由自主的在為每個對象做調整。不只有在戀愛上，有時候可能跟朋友、工作夥伴都是，尤其是在前輩面前，常常我都會本能反應似的改變自己。聲音要甜一點嗎？笑話要低級一點嗎？從穿衣服就可以看出，我今天是要跟誰吃飯。雖然是微調，但透露出了一件事，我好像不夠喜歡真正的自己，所以才會擔心大家也不會喜歡真正的我。我告訴自己即使累，但如果持續努力，有一天就能變成大家都喜歡的Lara。
久而久之我和世界的相處模式只有「由外到內」，會依照別人對我的反應去斷定我的下一步。大家會覺得我很好相處，我卻越來越不快樂。現在我慢慢開始懂了，原來我把順序弄反了。我該優先處理的是自己內心的感受，其他人買不買單，其實跟你一點關係都沒有。就像找另外一半，如果我跟夢中情人在一起，但我根本無法在他面前做自己，最後還是會走不下去。
我現在33歲，So What? 終於懂，「當下的自己」才是人生時間軸上最重要的！
對了，有人好奇這次「{}」的意思嗎？簡單說是「大括號」，在數學運算式中稱作「空集合」。數學不好的人就想像一個清空的行李箱吧。「空」不是無，而是無限可能。括號還有另外一個更好懂的意思，就是「優先處理」。將過去整理過後的自己，回歸純粹，態度成熟自信！(失戀後重新出發的人應該很有感觸吧！🤣)
Your best self is not in the future, but in the Now.
Looking back, I seem to have been playing a role in almost every relationship I was ever in. I'm not just talking about romantic relationships. Whether it was with friends or colleagues (especially seniors), I would modify myself almost instinctively. Should my voice be sweeter? My jokes dirtier? If you wanted to know who I was eating with that day, all you had to do was look at the clothes I was wearing.
The changes were subtle, but they still reflected a truth: I didn’t feel like the real me was enough so I was worried that other people would also find her lacking. I told myself that if I just kept working at it, I would someday become a version of Lara that everyone accepted.
Eventually I only knew how to get my cues from the external world. I would always base my next step on feedback I got from others. Most people considered me easy to get along with, but I grew more and more unhappy.
I think I had it all wrong. My first priority should have been listening to my inner voice. Whether or not other people agree with it is not in my control nor of my concern. Take looking for a partner. Even if I found the person of my dreams, it would never last if I couldn’t be myself around them.
I am 33 years old. So What? I finally understand that "the present self" is the most important thing on the timeline of life! It’s time to prioritize me!
By the way, is anyone curious about the meaning of "{}" this time? Besides the more commonly known representation of parentheses as prioritization, these curly brackets are called “the empty set”. The empty what? If like me, math is not your strongest suit, think of it as an empty suitcase. "Empty" doesn’t mean nothing, but infinite possibilities! What will you fill your life with this time?
2021全新專輯《來者何人{}》
數位收聽：https://LaraLiang.lnk.to/DearYou2
<再也沒有你> 陳勢安 Andrew Tan
數位收聽：https://kkbox.fm/Iss26l
#Lara梁心頤2021全新專輯二部曲 #來者何人{} 全球發行
#再也沒有你 #NoMoreU #SoWhat30
suit意思 在 [請益] suit用法與翻譯- 看板Eng-Class - 批踢踢實業坊 的推薦與評價
關於suit的用法與翻譯 A suits B =?= B suits A
以下是我的想法
==========================================
例如，以中文來說 "這個工作適合我" 或是 "我適合這個工作" 都表達一樣的意思
但是英文好像只看到 "This job suits me" 並不會說 "I suit this job"
問題來了 如果兩個都是sth呢？
例如"這個新政策不適合當代" = "當代不適合這個新政策"
但是我們好像會說 "The new policy doesn't suit the modern age"
並不會說 "The modern age doesn't suit the new policy"
不過...剛剛比較幾個例句：
1.This dress suits Carol = This dress is suitable for Carol
2.He was just not suitable for the job
那照1.的邏輯的話，2.不就是可以寫成 He just doesn't suit the job
這樣變成就有sb suits sth 的例句了
總之，我自己真要解釋的話 A適合B = A suits B , B適合A = B suits A
但是前後有略微不同，A適合B代表著B有種上位的感覺，A要"主動"來適合B??
以Free dictionary中有一句"This candidate does not suit our qualifications."
這個候選人不滿足(適合)我們的條件，是"我們的條件"為上位去挑這個候選人
如果寫成"Our qualifications don't suit this candidate"也是對的
只是意思略不同，變成"我們提出的條件"滿足不了這個候選人
有明確的解釋嗎？謝謝!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.255.6.105
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1498384546.A.5D0.html
這個例子是我舉的 主要是舉出A,B都是sth時 中文可說A適合B或是B適合A
那英文到底是"誰suit誰" 都可以但是不同文意?
總之 我主要想知道 I suit this job 是錯的還是只是不同文意??
謝謝
※ 編輯: znmkhxrw (1.173.162.103), 06/26/2017 15:45:01
我昨天開找一些網站時防毒軟體說已經檢測到危害 原來是這一個 sor 已刪
h大那兩個網站也看完了
感覺第一篇的語意就是表達我猜的那樣 I suit the job跟 The job suits me 有些差異
(誰配合誰的上下位差異)
而第二篇看下來就是文法都對拉 只是沒人那樣用@@
※ 編輯: znmkhxrw (1.173.162.103), 06/26/2017 22:38:56
... <看更多>