[Tổng hợp] Top chương trình thực tập chất lượng và hay ho
Tuần này chị tổng hợp những chương trình thực tập đang được đón chào nhất trong năm, với mức lương hấp dẫn và hứa hẹn kinh nghiệm giắt đầy túi sau khi kết thúc hehe. Lưu lại bài viết để tiện theo dõi cả nhà nhé!
1. Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology - OIST Research Internship (Nhật Bản)
- Lĩnh vực: Integrative Community, Energy Unit, Non-linear Equilibrium, Physics Unit, Quantum Systems, Evolutionary Genomics, Fluid Mechanics, Computational Neuroscience, Biological Systems, v.v
- Đối tượng: sinh viên từ năm 3 đại học trở lên, hoặc đang học thạc sĩ, hoặc vừa tốt nghiệp với background liên quan
- Thời gian: 2-6 tháng
- Tài trợ: vé máy bay + chi phí đi lại + chi phí sinh hoạt + chỗ ở + bảo hiểm (tất tần tật luôn)
- Deadline: 15.10.2021
- Link: https://admissions.oist.jp/oist-research-internship-program-description
2. Asian Development Bank Paid Internship 2021
- Lĩnh vực: nhiều vị trí, như Finance, Human and social development, natural resources & agriculture, v.v
- Thời gian: 8-26 tuần
- Đối tượng: ứng viên có kinh nghiệm với các dự án của ADB, tiếng Anh tốt, background liên quan
- Thực tập có hỗ trợ lương
- Deadline: 15.09.2021
- Link: https://www.adb.org/work-with-us/careers/internship-program#accordion-0-10
3. Microsoft Internship Program 2021 (Mỹ, Canada)
- Lĩnh vực:
- • Engineering (Software Engineer, Program Manager, Product Planning, Programmer Writer, Technical Writer, Services Engineering)
* Hardware Engineering
* UX Design
* Supply Chain
* Data and Applied Science
* IT Operations
* Finance
* Marketing
* Sales
* Services (Consultant, Support Engineer, Technical Account Manager, Technical Evangelist)
- Đối tượng: sinh viên từ bậc cử nhân đến tiến sĩ
- Tài trợ: thực tập có lương và hỗ trợ chi phí di chuyển
- Deadline: quanh năm
- Link: https://careers.microsoft.com/students/us/en/usuniversityinternship
4. OECD Internship 2021-22 (Pháp)
- Lĩnh vực: vô số lĩnh vực, xem chi tiết link bên dưới nha
- Thời gian: 1-6 tháng
- Đối tượng: sinh viên đại học, sau đại học toàn thời gian, có kỹ năng IT, thạo tiếng Anh/ tiếng Pháp…
- Tài trợ: hỗ trợ hàng tháng + hỗ trợ làm visa + cơ hội được renew tiếp trong 1 năm
- Deadline: 01.03.2022
- Link: https://www.oecd.org/careers/internship-programme/
5. Institute of Science and Technology - IST Scientific Internships 2021-22 (Áo)
- Lĩnh vực: Biology, computer science, data science & scientific computing, physics, mathematic science, neuroscience
- Thời gian: 1 năm
- Đối tượng: sinh viên cử nhân, thạc sĩ với chuyên ngành liên quan
- Tài trợ: lương hàng tháng + bảo hiểm y tế + khoá học tiếng + tiền đi lại + một số hỗ trợ khác
- Deadline: mở quanh năm
- Link: https://phd.pages.ist.ac.at/scientific-internships/
❤ Tag và chia sẻ thông tin đến bạn bè em nhé ❤
#HannahEd #duhoc #hocbong #sanhocbong #scholarshipforVietnamesestudents
systems biology 在 陳良基的創新筆記 Facebook 的最讚貼文
台灣創新的基礎仍待國會多多支持
由這幾天的趨勢,看起來台灣的疫情在指揮中心拼命防堵之下,只要大家維持社交好習慣的配合,應該有機會控制下來。真的是天佑台灣,在如此險峻條件下,我們守起來了!台灣屢屢展現在一堆人士的唱衰中,堅挺屹立,實在要更有信心面對艱困的未來以及不斷地挑戰。
當然,光是信心並不夠,面對未知的將來,還是要有更多準備才行。我們都習慣講見賢思齊,讓我們來看看科技的強權,美國,最近做了什麼?
上個月初(六月八日),在台灣正為疫情及疫苗之亂所困之際,美國國會通過了非常重要的《美國創新與競爭法案》。這個法案也號稱是拜登政府上任最重要政策之一。當時,因為台灣疫情緊繃,似乎沒有多少人特別關注,頂多是講一下說,美國發現半導體很重要,特別訂定專法及經費要加強推動等等。事實上,這是一個非常關鍵且重要的科學基礎紮根計畫,大體而言,這個法案有數個特點:
ㄧ、將大家熟知的美國國家科學委員會(National Science Foundation)改為國家科學及技術委員會(National Science and Technology Foundation),兩位副主委,一管科學,一管技術。法案中甚至特別強調出,技術副主委的重要職責之一是,Increasing federally-funded research and development to achieve national goals related to economic competitiveness, domestic manufacturing, national security, shared prosperity, energy and the environment, health, education and workforce development, and transportation。這與我離職前向蔡總統建議的,將科技部改制為國家科學與技術委員會,走向完全一致。科技不能只是自己專注研發,必須前接人才教育,後接經濟發展能力,這是科技時代的必要趨勢。
二、未來五年內(2022-2026),選定十項科學與技術項目(如附資料),預定至少投入1100億美元以上,交由新的NSTF用於協助高教及研發機構,針對選定項目做基礎及前瞻研究。展現美國面對未來科技的謹慎和視野,唯有回到基礎的科學根本,才能帶領人類向前跳躍,找到更多創新機會。
三、再度強化STEM教育的重要,未來五年提撥至少五十億美元,用於強化人才培育的STEM教育。STEM教育這幾年在教育界也是很響亮的口號, STEM指的分別是,Science(科學)、Technology(技術)、Engineering(工程)、Mathematics(數學),正是為來人才走近高科技的必備基礎訓練。但在台灣,STEM 不只在國教中被弱化,更在未來高教的選材上被邊緣化,據說,未來甚至於,大學端的理工生醫等重要學科的入學考試中,根本被放生!台灣十年、二十年後,高科技的人才來源岌岌可危!
對國家長程的未來那麼重要的法案,在拜登政府和國會成員上任短短不到一年內完成立法程序!當然,這也可以看成是美國全民的鼎力支持,才能讓法案順利通過。
台灣的國會、台灣的政府,我們的國會、我們的政府當然也應該做得到,也應該看得到。這不是一兩年內會有大變化、或大政績的工作,但是不做,台灣在未來的競爭力將逐年慢慢減弱。但是,無論是政府、國會,他們的力量還是來自全民的支持,唯有台灣能有一股力量支持,督促政府、國會去思考這些長程競爭力的必要工作,政府、國會才能從每天焦頭爛額
的政治爭執中跳脫出來。
美國選定的十大重點項目:
The United States Innovation and Competition Act of 2021 (USICA), formerly known as the Endless Frontier Act, passed into law on 8 June 2021. It authorizes $110 Billion for basic and advanced technology research over a five year period. It includes investment in:
1. Artificial intelligence and machine learning
2. High performance computing, semiconductors, and advanced computer hardware
3. Quantum computing and information systems
4. Robotics, automation, and advanced manufacturing
5. Natural or anthropogenic disaster prevention
6. Advanced communications technology
7. Biotechnology, genomics, and synthetic biology
8. Advanced energy technology
9. Cybersecurity, data storage, and data management technologies
10. Materials science, engineering, and exploration relevant to the other focus areas
https://www.inside.com.tw/article/23806-usa-semiconductor-investment-contend-china
systems biology 在 Mordeth13 Facebook 的最佳解答
Jenna Cody :
Is Taiwan a real China?
No, and with the exception of a few intervening decades - here’s the part that’ll surprise you - it never has been.
This’ll blow your mind too: that it never has been doesn’t matter.
So let’s start with what doesn’t actually matter.
Until the 1600s, Taiwan was indigenous. Indigenous Taiwanese are not Chinese, they’re Austronesian. Then it was a Dutch colony (note: I do not say “it was Dutch”, I say it was a Dutch colony). Then it was taken over by Ming loyalists at the end of the Ming dynasty (the Ming loyalists were breakaways, not a part of the new Qing court. Any overlap in Ming rule and Ming loyalist conquest of Taiwan was so brief as to be inconsequential).
Only then, in the late 1600s, was it taken over by the Chinese (Qing). But here’s the thing, it was more like a colony of the Qing, treated as - to use Emma Teng’s wording in Taiwan’s Imagined Geography - a barrier or barricade keeping the ‘real’ Qing China safe. In fact, the Qing didn’t even want Taiwan at first, the emperor called it “a ball of mud beyond the pale of civilization”. Prior to that, and to a great extent at that time, there was no concept on the part of China that Taiwan was Chinese, even though Chinese immigrants began moving to Taiwan under Dutch colonial rule (mostly encouraged by the Dutch, to work as laborers). When the Spanish landed in the north of Taiwan, it was the Dutch, not the Chinese, who kicked them out.
Under Qing colonial rule - and yes, I am choosing my words carefully - China only controlled the Western half of Taiwan. They didn’t even have maps for the eastern half. That’s how uninterested in it they were. I can’t say that the Qing controlled “Taiwan”, they only had power over part of it.
Note that the Qing were Manchu, which at the time of their conquest had not been a part of China: China itself essentially became a Manchu imperial holding, and Taiwan did as well, once they were convinced it was not a “ball of mud” but actually worth taking. Taiwan was not treated the same way as the rest of “Qing China”, and was not administered as a province until (I believe) 1887. So that’s around 200 years of Taiwan being a colony of the Qing.
What happened in the late 19th century to change China’s mind? Japan. A Japanese ship was shipwrecked in eastern Taiwan in the 1870s, and the crew was killed by hostile indigenous people in what is known as the Mudan Incident. A Japanese emissary mission went to China to inquire about what could be done, only to be told that China had no control there and if they went to eastern Taiwan, they did so at their own peril. China had not intended to imply that Taiwan wasn’t theirs, but they did. Japan - and other foreign powers, as France also attempted an invasion - were showing an interest in Taiwan, so China decided to cement its claim, started mapping the entire island, and made it a province.
So, I suppose for a decade or so Taiwan was a part of China. A China that no longer exists.
It remained a province until 1895, when it was ceded to Japan after the (first) Sino-Japanese War. Before that could happen, Taiwan declared itself a Republic, although it was essentially a Qing puppet state (though the history here is interesting - correspondence at the time indicates that the leaders of this ‘Republic of Taiwan’ considered themselves Chinese, and the tiger flag hints at this as well. However, the constitution was a very republican document, not something you’d expect to see in Qing-era China.) That lasted for less than a year, when the Japanese took it by force.
This is important for two reasons - the first is that some interpretations of IR theory state that when a colonial holding is released, it should revert to the state it was in before it was taken as a colony. In this case, that would actually be The Republic of Taiwan, not Qing-era China. Secondly, it puts to rest all notions that there was no Taiwan autonomy movement prior to 1947.
In any case, it would be impossible to revert to its previous state, as the government that controlled it - the Qing empire - no longer exists. The current government of China - the PRC - has never controlled it.
After the Japanese colonial era, there is a whole web of treaties and agreements that do not satisfactorily settle the status of Taiwan. None of them actually do so - those which explicitly state that Taiwan is to be given to the Republic of China (such as the Cairo declaration) are non-binding. Those that are binding do not settle the status of Taiwan (neither the treaty of San Francisco nor the Treaty of Taipei definitively say that Taiwan is a part of China, or even which China it is - the Treaty of Taipei sets out what nationality the Taiwanese are to be considered, but that doesn’t determine territorial claims). Treaty-wise, the status of Taiwan is “undetermined”.
Under more modern interpretations, what a state needs to be a state is…lessee…a contiguous territory, a government, a military, a currency…maybe I’m forgetting something, but Taiwan has all of it. For all intents and purposes it is independent already.
In fact, in the time when all of these agreements were made, the Allied powers weren’t as sure as you might have learned about what to do with Taiwan. They weren’t a big fan of Chiang Kai-shek, didn’t want it to go Communist, and discussed an Allied trusteeship (which would have led to independence) or backing local autonomy movements (which did exist). That it became what it did - “the ROC” but not China - was an accident (as Hsiao-ting Lin lays out in Accidental State).
In fact, the KMT knew this, and at the time the foreign minister (George Yeh) stated something to the effect that they were aware they were ‘squatters’ in Taiwan.
Since then, it’s true that the ROC claims to be the rightful government of Taiwan, however, that hardly matters when considering the future of Taiwan simply because they have no choice. To divest themselves of all such claims (and, presumably, change their name) would be considered by the PRC to be a declaration of formal independence. So that they have not done so is not a sign that they wish to retain the claim, merely that they wish to avoid a war.
It’s also true that most Taiwanese are ethnically “Han” (alongside indigenous and Hakka, although Hakka are, according to many, technically Han…but I don’t think that’s relevant here). But biology is not destiny: what ethnicity someone is shouldn’t determine what government they must be ruled by.
Through all of this, the Taiwanese have evolved their own culture, identity and sense of history. They are diverse in a way unique to Taiwan, having been a part of Austronesian and later Hoklo trade routes through Southeast Asia for millenia. Now, one in five (I’ve heard one in four, actually) Taiwanese children has a foreign parent. The Taiwanese language (which is not Mandarin - that’s a KMT transplant language forced on Taiwanese) is gaining popularity as people discover their history. Visiting Taiwan and China, it is clear where the cultural differences are, not least in terms of civic engagement. This morning, a group of legislators were removed after a weekend-long pro-labor hunger strike in front of the presidential palace. They were not arrested and will not be. Right now, a group of pro-labor protesters is lying down on the tracks at Taipei Main Station to protest the new labor law amendments.
This would never be allowed in China, but Taiwanese take it as a fiercely-guarded basic right.
*
Now, as I said, none of this matters.
What matters is self-determination. If you believe in democracy, you believe that every state (and Taiwan does fit the definition of a state) that wants to be democratic - that already is democratic and wishes to remain that way - has the right to self-determination. In fact, every nation does. You cannot be pro-democracy and also believe that it is acceptable to deprive people of this right, especially if they already have it.
Taiwan is already a democracy. That means it has the right to determine its own future. Period.
Even under the ROC, Taiwan was not allowed to determine its future. The KMT just arrived from China and claimed it. The Taiwanese were never asked if they consented. What do we call it when a foreign government arrives in land they had not previously governed and declares itself the legitimate governing power of that land without the consent of the local people? We call that colonialism.
Under this definition, the ROC can also be said to be a colonial power in Taiwan. They forced Mandarin - previously not a language native to Taiwan - onto the people, taught Chinese history, geography and culture, and insisted that the Taiwanese learn they were Chinese - not Taiwanese (and certainly not Japanese). This was forced on them. It was not chosen. Some, for awhile, swallowed it. Many didn’t. The independence movement only grew, and truly blossomed after democratization - something the Taiwanese fought for and won, not something handed to them by the KMT.
So what matters is what the Taiwanese want, not what the ROC is forced to claim. I cannot stress this enough - if you do not believe Taiwan has the right to this, you do not believe in democracy.
And poll after poll shows it: Taiwanese identify more as Taiwanese than Chinese (those who identify as both primarily identify as Taiwanese, just as I identify as American and Armenian, but primarily as American. Armenian is merely my ethnicity). They overwhelmingly support not unifying with China. The vast majority who support the status quo support one that leads to eventual de jure independence, not unification. The status quo is not - and cannot be - an endgame (if only because China has declared so, but also because it is untenable). Less than 10% want unification. Only a small number (a very small minority) would countenance unification in the future…even if China were to democratize.
The issue isn’t the incompatibility of the systems - it’s that the Taiwanese fundamentally do not see themselves as Chinese.
A change in China’s system won’t change that. It’s not an ethnic nationalism - there is no ethnic argument for Taiwan (or any nation - didn’t we learn in the 20th century what ethnicity-based nation-building leads to? Nothing good). It’s not a jingoistic or xenophobic nationalism - Taiwanese know that to be dangerous. It’s a nationalism based on shared identity, culture, history and civics. The healthiest kind of nationalism there is. Taiwan exists because the Taiwanese identify with it. Period.
There are debates about how long the status quo should go on, and what we should risk to insist on formal recognition. However, the question of whether or not to be Taiwan, not China…
…well, that’s already settled.
The Taiwanese have spoken and they are not Chinese.
Whatever y’all think about that doesn’t matter. That’s what they want, and if you believe in self-determination you will respect it.
If you don’t, good luck with your authoritarian nonsense, but Taiwan wants nothing to do with it.
systems biology 在 Systems Biology as Defined by NIH 的相關結果
Systems biology is an approach in biomedical research to understanding the larger picture—be it at the level of the organism, tissue, or cell—by putting its ... ... <看更多>
systems biology 在 What Is Systems Biology 的相關結果
What Is Systems Biology · Institute for Systems Biology. ... <看更多>
systems biology 在 系統生物學- 維基百科,自由的百科全書 的相關結果
系統生物學(systems biology),是一個使用整體論(而非還原論)的方式, 整合不同學科、層次的信息,以研究、分析、理解(即多組學整合分析)生物系統如何行使功能的 ... ... <看更多>