【A.I. FOREVER】在Youtube看到的一篇很長的comment,寫得非常詳細,從數據上比較其他偉大球星,檢視Iverson的職業生涯表現,給予他更公正的評價。
(by sportsmed77)
[+Kareem Elwakil Those other posters shouldn't have insulted you to make their points, but I think your arguments are extremely weak. The only thing you bring up is that AI's career FG% was 42% and that he jacked up "30 shots" to get his points. His FG% was technically 42.5% for his career (Tracy McGrady's was 43% and Kobe Bryant's was 45%, which really isn't that much higher relatively speaking by the way) and a lot of AI's missed shots had to do with the team he was playing on and how their offense was structured, his role on the team as the only scorer, etc. but I won't get into that. AI averaged about 21 shots per game for his career, by the way. Hardly the 30 shots per game you tried to give him credit for. AI led the NBA in scoring 4 times, and out of those for times, only twice did he also lead the league in field goal attempts (and not by much - plus he averaged more free throws than everyone else) so the argument that "if anyone shot as much as AI did, they would score as much too" clearly is not the case. In his prime, Tracy McGrady averaged about 23 shots per game, Kobe Bryant also about 23 shots per game, and AI also about 23 shots per game. AI, Kobe, and Jordan all had a season where they shot the ball 27 times per game. Per 36 minutes, AI only averaged 19 shots per game for his career (keep in mind, AI played more minutes than anyone else each game during his era). Michael Jordan averaged 23 shots per game for his entire career. For his career, Jerry West averaged 20 shots per game and in his prime, it was about 22 shots per game. Before Lebron James got there, Dwayne Wade was averaging between 20 and 22 shots per game for a few seasons because he was the go-to option. You know what all of these players have in common with AI? They were all SHOOTING GUARDS and the go-to option! They were supposed to shoot! Some SGs are volume shooters who slash and get to the free throw line. Some of them have lower FG% but still are productive for their teams. Other SGs have a higher efficiency, but a player's FG% really depends on a number of factors you haven't even taken into consideration.
To reiterate this point, for most of AI's career, he was a SHOOTING GUARD. I hate when people compare him to point guards and then act like he was worse than them because he didn't play like a PG. It is ridiculous because it is like comparing apples with oranges. By the way, you brought up Jason Kidd and how he was so much "better" than AI. Did you know Jason Kidd's career FG% is 40%? He had 10 seasons where he shot below 40% for the season. AI only shot below 40% for 1.5 seasons and his career FG% is higher than J-Kidd's. J-Kidd averaged 12 PPG for his career and only 2.8 free throw attempts. AI averages about 27 PPG for his career. So just as you can say J-Kidd was a way better passer than AI, I can say AI was a way better scorer than J-Kidd. They had different roles and they excelled in their roles. Jason's job was to pass, and AI's job was to create shots.
It is a myth that AI was not a good passer. AI averaged 6.2 assists per game for his career. That is good for a SG - more than Kobe, more than MJ, more than Vince Carter, more than Tracy McGrady, more than Wade, etc. AI had about 5 or 6 seasons where he averaged between 7 and 8 assists per game while still scoring 26+ points. It is impressive. He had an entire season where he averaged 33 PPG and 7.4 APG with 2 steals on 45% shooting and a TS% of over 54%, and people like you try to say he was just "okay at best"? AI had a unique style, especially for his size and was probably one of the top 5 most exciting players to watch. To say he was not "that good" shows that you likely saw very few AI games. I would say AI is a top 20-30 player all-time. Anyone who actually saw, for example, his 2001 play-offs and regular season run, would know that he was amazing and did so much for that team and if someone looks at the stat box, they will not get the actual story. You had to have seen the games with your own eyes. With AI, stats have always been misleading. I also want to point out that AI's True Shooting % (TS%) is slightly higher than Isiah "Zeke" Thomas and is pretty decent (at about 52%). He had a couple of seasons in Denver where his TS% was almost 57%. TS% is a much more accurate depiction of someone's accuracy when shooting. You know why? Because it takes into account free throws among other factors. AI is one of the greatest players of all-time at getting to the free throw line, and unlike Lebron James and many others, he didn't flop to do it. He was legitimately fouled, hurt, and referees even admitted to conspiring against him and purposely not calling fouls on players who fouled him when they should have. Yet AI is still 10th all-time in free throws made. He was a slashing, fearless guard with incredible talent and an ability to create shots for himself that very few other players have been able to do. His style of play is more comparable to Kobe Bryant or Tracy McGrady (Kobe had a better career, but in AI's prime there were seasons where they were almost equally good). Yet he is 160 lbs. soaking wet so he is an anomoly because small players aren't supposed to be able to do what he does. The two years AI's shooting percentage was the lowest in Philly, he had just come off of a serious elbow surgery (2001-2002) and had played with a broken hand another season. You put so much emphasis on his accuracy those seasons, but what about his heart? How many players would play with the injuries he had? I guarantee you not many. Even while in Denver, Carmelo said AI was playing with a broken finger the entire season. In the 2001 play-offs by the end of the 2nd round, AI had 7 injuries (serious elbow bursitis, knee bursitis, dislocated shoulder, sprained thumb, hip pointer, bruised tailbown, and twisted ankle). Yet he played, and he played his heart out contributing to his team in other ways even when he couldn't find his shooting rhythm due to the pain he was in. I watched every game he played in back then (even taped them so I could immitate some of his moves since I played ball). I would know.
I am definitely convinced that anyone who claims Iverson was an "extremely poor shooter" either did not watch him play or knows a lot less about basketball than they think they know. AI was not a poor shooter. He took incredibly difficult shots - often times while double and triple teamed, and given that he was smaller than everyone else, it is incredible that he still made some of them. He was a shot creator. He was immensely creative. Larry Brown even used to sit on the sidelines and call out to AI to shoot the ball more and create shots. Even George Karl in Denver once told AI to shoot the ball more, stop being so UNSELFISH, and take over games the way he used to in Philly. Unfortunately the media doesn't like to talk about that. Not one of AI's teammates thought he was selfish. I have seen very few players who are as loved and respected by his former teammates and former peers as AI. The amount of love he gets from everyone from Dr. J, Maurice Cheeks, Moses Malone, Kobe Bryant, Lebron James, Dwayne Wade, Carmelo Anthony, Aaron McKie, Eric Snow, Theo Ratliff, Dikembe Mutombo, Chris Webber, Kyle Korver, Chris Paul, James Harden, Larry Brown, Paul Pierce, John Thompson, Andre Iguodala, Larry Hughes, Bill Walton, Rip Hamilton, Rasheed Wallace, Shawn Marion, Steve Nash, Dirk Nowitzki, Shaquille O'Neal, etc. etc. etc. I can go on and on. Many of these very players have called AI "pound for pound the greatest." I have seen very few players get so much love and adoration by their peers. I was at AI's jersey retirement and heard what so many players around the league past and present had to say about him and it was just insane. I also have never heard one of AI's former teammates call him a bad teammate. They loved him and loved playing with him. It is the media that tries to paint that picture, but his peers and former teammates paint a completely different picture.
What the media says is a myth. AI's former coaches and teammates and peers adore him. In 2001, AI had the most first place MVP votes in history (tied with Shaq) and became the smallest player to ever win the MVP award. You think he is overrated? I guarantee you the people who vote on MVP, the players, the coaching staff, etc. know far more about AI's contributions to the sport, how good he was, etc. than you do. He deserves what he got. Every accomplishment he achieved, he did it despite immense adversity. He is 7th All-Time in PPG, 4th All-Time in Minutes Played, 7th All-time in Steals, won 1st Team All-NBA multiple times... this man played with so much heart and believed in himself so much that you had to believe in him. This man is up there with MJ, Kobe, Wilt, and players of that caliber for most 40 and 50 point games in his career. I hate when people try to take away from his accomplishments rather than appreciating him for what he accomplished at his size and what he brought to the game. He is the reason I played basketball at all. He gave little people hope. He is a cultural icon. I really wish people would stop with the "AI is overrated" nonsense. If your peers think that highly of you to call you "pound for pound the greatest," then obviously you did something right. ]
#alleniverson #theanswer #ai3 #onlythestrongsurvive #sixers #76ers #bubbachuck #basketballneverstops
同時也有10000部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル,也在其Youtube影片中提到,...
「talent plus評價」的推薦目錄:
- 關於talent plus評價 在 喬靖夫 Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於talent plus評價 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於talent plus評價 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於talent plus評價 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於talent plus評價 在 [心得]hunter介紹工作轉職分享- 看板Salary - 批踢踢實業坊 的評價
- 關於talent plus評價 在 [公司] TalentPlus德倫斯管理顧問 的評價
- 關於talent plus評價 在 最新趨勢觀測站- talent plus評價的推薦與評價,PTT、DCARD 的評價
- 關於talent plus評價 在 最新趨勢觀測站- talent plus評價的推薦與評價,PTT、DCARD 的評價
- 關於talent plus評價 在 德倫思管理顧問有限公司ptt-Dcard與PTT討論推薦|2022年06月 的評價
- 關於talent plus評價 在 德倫思管理顧問有限公司ptt-Dcard與PTT討論推薦|2022年06月 的評價
- 關於talent plus評價 在 [公司] 有聽過talent plus這間公司嗎? mikebbb PTT批踢踢實業坊 的評價
- 關於talent plus評價 在 [公司] TalentPlus德倫斯管理顧問- 看板Salary - PTT網頁版 的評價
- 關於talent plus評價 在 實習透視鏡Intern Lens 的評價
- 關於talent plus評價 在 【Joeman】實測!網路上徵打字賺外快的廣告原來是詐騙? 的評價
- 關於talent plus評價 在 中壢旅宿王ptt 的評價
talent plus評價 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的精選貼文
talent plus評價 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳解答
talent plus評價 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳貼文
talent plus評價 在 [公司] TalentPlus德倫斯管理顧問 的推薦與評價
[公司] TalentPlus德倫斯管理顧問 ; 07:45Hunter 業績壓力蠻大的可能每天被review 電話數時 ; 07:45數等等優點大概是辦公室比較漂亮年輕女生比較多沒 ; 07:45 ... ... <看更多>
talent plus評價 在 德倫思管理顧問有限公司ptt-Dcard與PTT討論推薦|2022年06月 的推薦與評價
找德倫思管理顧問有限公司ptt在Dcard與PTT討論/評價與推薦,提供talentplus評價,德倫思管理顧問有限公司ptt,talentplus獵頭相關資訊,找德倫思管理顧問有限公司ptt就在 ... ... <看更多>
talent plus評價 在 [心得]hunter介紹工作轉職分享- 看板Salary - 批踢踢實業坊 的推薦與評價
近期開始透過獵人頭公司來幫忙找工作,先來說台灣hunter公司
有adecoo, manpower, michael page, recruit express, talent plus,
hrnet one, peolplesearch,imc, rising management, platinum,等等
,就我有印像的就打在上面,另外像是springasia是adecco子公司,
serachasisa是recruit express,就不在專門說明了,因為他們的人才
資料庫是共用的。
與hunter接觸可以分兩個層面,一個是你主動找他們,另一個是
hunter來找你,這樣方式是不太一樣的,白話一點就是一個是你有求予人,
另一個是hunter有求與你。
基本上先說主動找hunter的求職人,要先搞清楚自己想找那個領
域的工作,hi tech, FMCG, Aotomation, 等都是不一樣的hunter負責的,
再來就是工作性質,你是要找業務, FAE, service, 工程師等,這些確定
後就可以找hunter聊聊,想辦法問出負責你想求職的工作領域和工作性質
的hunter公司。
若是hunter主動找你的話,基本上他對你的工作經驗及背景就
有一定的了解,所以可以大方的跟hunter聊聊你的工作需求,聽聽hunter
介紹給你的工作,看有沒有興趣。
最後簡單的說,hunter找你時,你一定要好好聽聽這個工作的需
求,請hunter把工作的jd寄給你,專業的hunter的jd上,會有工作內容、
年薪範圍、福利年假、獎金計算方式,而不是拿104那套的工作jd給求職者
看,那算是很不專業的hunter。
了解工作需求後,再來就是問清楚總共有幾關面試,面試的人是
經理、總經理,有沒有面試車馬費補助,了解面試流程進行方式及時間,
好讓自己安排時間。
通常第一次hunter打給你後,會透過聊天問與答的方式,了解
你這個人適不適合這個工作,也會直接在電話裡直接跟你英文聊天,主
要也是想了解你的語言能力,通常hunter都是喝個洋墨水,英文都是很
流利的,如果求職者本身英文很好時,建議直接從頭到尾跟hunter就英
文直接聊天,這會幫你省下很多時間,也會讓hunter跟確定的語言能力。
因為hunter也是需要業績的,所以在你有機會去面試他們介紹
的工作時,你可以要求你的hunter模擬面試的問題,他們會教你如何
回答出讓人覺得合理又想聽的答覆方式,想辦法讓你拿到offer,千萬要
記得面試時,被問到你要的待遇時,一定要回答請與我的hunter討論,
不要自己去談,這樣就失去找hunter的意義,而且透過hunter去談高薪
會比自己容易,談越高的年薪,hunter就抽越高的獎金,但不是對求職
者抽,所以不用擔心。
若是沒機會去面試的話,hunter通常都會很客氣的跟你說,我
會把你的資料留著,日後有合適的工作機會就會再跟你聯絡,這時你可
以考慮要不要把你的資料給他們,因為有很多hunter只收集個人履歷,
然後都很少與求職者聯絡,覺得沒業績可以成交就會不想找,所以你可
以考慮要不要給他們。
要是你已經他們履歷的人也沒關係,就請他們幫你看看你的中
英文履歷有什麼要修改的地方,請他們給你建議,這會對你日後求職有
很大的幫助。
求職者與hunter的關系是很微妙的,所以在沒有摸清雙方底細
時,都不要輕易相信對方,因為我們會找hunter就是想縮短找工作的時
間,省去無謂的羅輯、性向、英文測驗,然後又可以在面試前了解工作
內容,薪水,跟在104上找工作比起來,會減少碰到爛公司爛薪水,會
節省大家很多時間的。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.170.28.62
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Salary/M.1451994483.A.A73.html
... <看更多>