關於 verdict意思 ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

[時事英文] 精神錯亂辯護
　
The insanity defense, also known as the mental disorder defense, is an affirmative defense by excuse in a criminal case, arguing that the defendant is not responsible for their actions due to an episodic or persistent psychiatric disease at the time of the criminal act. This is contrasted with an excuse of provocation, in which the defendant is responsible, but the responsibility is lessened due to a temporary mental state.
　
1. the insanity defense 精神錯亂辯護
2. mental disorder 精神障礙
3. an affirmative defense 積極抗辯；確認的抗辯
4. defendant 被告人
5. responsible for their actions 為他們的行為負責
6. episodic 發作的；偶發的
7. persistent psychiatric disease 持續的精神性疾病
8. a criminal act 犯罪行為
9. an excuse of provocation 義憤殺人的免責條款*
10. be lessened 被減輕
11. a temporary mental state 暫時的精神狀態
　
精神錯亂辯護 ，也叫做精神障礙辯護，是刑事案件中用以積極抗辯的理由，鑑於被告犯罪時偶發或持續的精神性疾病，故無法為其行為負責。這與義憤殺人的免責條款形成對比——在義憤殺人的情況中被告負有刑責，惟由於暫時的精神狀態，刑責得以減輕。
　
*an excuse of provocation 詳參——
《中華民國刑法》：https://bit.ly/2SqhOqh
最高法院刑事判決：https://bit.ly/35kEo8K
　
★★★★★★★★★★★★
　
《台北時報》報導：
　
The man charged in the slaying of a railway police officer last year was acquitted of murder by the Chiayi District Court yesterday, with judges saying that the suspect, surnamed Cheng, had a mental disorder. However, Cheng was ordered to undergo five years of psychiatric treatment.
　
12. be charged with 被控告
13. the slaying of 殺害⋯⋯
14. a railway police officer 鐵路警察
15. be acquitted 被宣判無罪
16. suspect (n.) 嫌犯
17. undergo 接受（治療或檢查等）；經歷，經受（令人不快的事或變化）
18. psychiatric treatment 精神病治療
　
昨日，這名於去年被控殺害一名鐵路警察的男子，被嘉義地方法院宣判無罪，法官表示鄭嫌患有精神障礙。惟令鄭接受五年的精神病治療。
　
★★★★★★★★★★★★
　
The parents of Lee Cheng-han, the 25-year-old railway officer killed in July last year, were at the court. Lee Tseng-wen, Lee Cheng-han’s father, told reporters after the verdict was announced: “This is outrageous.”

“My son was killed in the line of his duty as a police officer and the court gave a not guilty ruling,” he said. “It is painful for me right now. The judges have lost their senses and reason.”
　
19. verdict 裁決
20. in the line of duty 在工作中；在執行任務時
21. not guilty 無罪
22. a court ruling 法院判決
　
去年７月遭殺害的２５歲鐵路警察李承翰的父母在法庭上。在判決宣布後，李承翰的父親李增文對記者說：「這太可恥了。」

他說：「我兒子在履行警察的職責時被殺害，而法院竟作出無罪的判決。」「此時此刻，這對我來說很痛苦。法官們失去了判斷力與理智。」
　
★★★★★★★★★★★★
　
“He was our only son. He worked diligently and was devoted to his family. We have to suffer the pain and sorrow of his death to this day,” he said. “If we could turn back the clock, we would never allow him to work as a police officer.”
　
23. suffer 遭受；受苦
24. pain and sorrow 痛苦與悲傷
25. turn back the clock 將時間倒轉
　
「他是我們的獨生子。他工作勤奮並為家庭犧牲奉獻。直到今天，我們都必須承受他去世的痛苦與悲傷，」他說。「 如果我們可以讓時間倒轉，我們絕不允許他當警察。」
　
★★★★★★★★★★★★
　
Cheng, 55, was examined by psychiatrists, who said that he was suffering from schizophrenia when he stabbed Lee Cheng-han. “He was under a delusion that affected his behavior at the time,” the psychiatrists said in a report. “His actions resulted from his mental condition.”
　
26. be examined by 被⋯⋯檢查
27. schizophrenia 思覺失調症；精神分裂症
28. stab（用刀等銳器）刺
29. under a delusion 陷入一種妄想（或幻想）
30. result from 肇因於⋯⋯
31. mental condition 精神狀況
　
鄭現年５５歲，接受了精神科醫生的檢查，醫生說他刺傷李承翰時正受思覺失調症所苦。「他當時正陷入一種妄想，影響了他的行為。」精神科醫生在一份報告中寫道。「他的行為乃肇因於他的精神狀況。」
　
★★★★★★★★★★★★
　
“Psychiatrists say that people with schizophrenia must take medication their whole lives. If they do not, they will relapse,” the report said. “Cheng’s mental capacity had deteriorated and he had lost awareness of his action at the time.”

The judges cited Article 19 of the Criminal Code: “An offense is not punishable if it is committed by a person who is mentally disordered.” Cheng was granted release on NT$500,000 bail, but his family reportedly could not pay the amount, so he remained in detention yesterday.
　
32. take medication 服藥
33. relapse 舊病復發
34. mental capacity 意思能力*
35. deteriorate 惡化；變壞
36. lose awareness 失去意識
37. an offense 罪過
38. not punishable 不罰
39. be granted release 被批准釋放
40. bail 保釋金
41. pay the amount 支付該筆金額
42. remain in detention 持續拘留
　
「精神科醫生說，思覺失調症患者須終生服藥。否則將會舊病復發。」報告寫道。「鄭的意思能力已惡化，他當時已對自身行為失去意識。」法官們引述了《刑法》第１９條：「行為時因精神障礙或其他心智缺陷，致不能辨識其行為違法或欠缺依其辨識而行為之能力者，不罰。」鄭獲准以新臺幣五十萬元交保，但據報導他的家人無法支付這筆罰金，因此他昨日仍被拘留。
　
*意思能力：「對於自己之行為及其效果，能正常判斷、識別及預期之精神能力。」詳參：https://bit.ly/2KPeVuN
　
資訊出處: https://bit.ly/2KQz4k9
　
圖片出處：https://bit.ly/3dhI9Pl
　
★★★★★★★★★★★★
　
[時事英文] 死刑：https://bit.ly/3bVrtg6
　
時事英文講義：https://bit.ly/2XmRYXc
　
時事英文大全：http://bit.ly/2WtAqop
　
如何使用「時事英文」：https://bit.ly/3a9rr38

#徐薇英文教室
YouTube昨日更新了頻道認證方式，並大量寄出通知信告知使用者他們已不符合認證資格，需重新等官方認證或上訴，引起 YouTuber恐慌，紛紛表達強烈反彈。(YouTube raises bar for channel verification, stripping some creators of verified status.) verification(n.認證)來自動詞verify(v.證實)=字根-ver-(表true)+動詞字尾-fy，經過證實的事情就是真正的事情；再加上名詞字尾-ion，verification就是認證、驗證的意思。(★verdict判決、verity真理或事實，都有字根-ver-表true真實的)
圖來源於：徐薇英文儒優分校
====================================
📌預約全省徐薇英文分校【試讀體驗】 即可抽🤖️ #凱比機器人喔!
🔗免費預約試讀體驗★ http://ruby.com.tw/signup/
📌徐薇英文全國分校搜尋系統：
http://www.ruby.com.tw/school-search.php

【專題訪問 Interview Feature】2019年度香港大學學生會周年大選中央幹事會候選内閣蒼傲訪問（外務篇） | Interview with Prism, the Proposed Cabinet of Executive Committee, The Hong Kong University Students’ Union of Annual Election 2019 (External Affairs)

(Please scroll down for English version.)

中央幹事會候選內閣蒼傲就外務議題接受本台訪問，就不同外務議題立場，包括不反對政府取締民族黨的原因、相信政府DQ議員合法的理據、初一事件有黑幫介入的看法、及對法律制度有信心的理由等發表意見。

訪問節錄如下：

1. 你們的政治光譜/政治立場是甚麼？
我們認為用現有的名詞並不能表達我們莊的政治立場，因為例如本土、港獨等，第一他們並沒有清晰的界定，或是社會一致的定義，我們都認為不論是政治光譜或是政治立場我們作為香港人或是香港接受教育的人，其實我們的立場都會傾向由香港出發。但由香港出發去考慮香港利益時，我們都要考慮時間軸。時間軸的意思是，我們到底在考慮短期還是長期的利益。加上香港的地理位置、經濟結構其實都十分依賴世界上大部份的國家，不論金融、出口產業，所以在考慮香港利益同時，我們都應考慮鄰近國家的政策、議案的推出。所以如果要用幾個字去形容我們的政治立場，我們會選擇「國際視野，本土出發」八個字。前者是考想利益的角度,後者是執行的角度。

2. 你們是否支持香港獨立？
首先我們認為它可以被自由地討論，特別是在大學之內。至於是否贊成香港獨立方面，港獨並非香港現時可執行最好的決策，因為尚有很多的選擇可加以考慮及討論。另外我認為香港內部的問題都非常嚴峻，例如我們在政綱小册子上提到的外務議題，如學生自殺、高樓價、創新科技嚴重落後等問題。這些都是我們內部必須解決和面對的問題，所以我們會將那些內部問題列為最優先需要處理的問題。

3. 你們覺得香港獨立是否合法？
我們認為任何符合法例的討論都是可被接受的，所以我們認為只要某個人或團體在現時完善的法律制度下，加上沒有違反法律，就應可就不同議題提出想法。

4. 你們是否同意香港政府取締香港民族黨？
首先我們相信香港的法治仍然相當完善，所以就香港一套完整司法制度體系下做出的判決，我們並沒有太多質疑或反對。對於民族黨被政府取締或禁止，社會上有不同聲音，但我們相信我們應遵守絕大部分香港市民都認同是完善的法律體系下作出的任何決策。

5. 你們是否同意香港政府DQ議員？
其實我們由始至終都相信，而坊間一些調查機構都指出香港的法治制度在世界上都名列前茅，所以我們相信這套法治制度可以帶來公平的審訊，所以對於有部分議員被DQ，我們願意相信整個判決過程是公平的，並且有足夠理據去支持政府所作的判決，所以我們對這件事沒有任何特別意見。

6. 你們是否支持人大釋法？
每一個法律的訂立，其實都是由一小部分的精英去開始建構框架，然後隨社會的進步不斷完善。所以法律並非一本已經印刷好的書，而是容許我們不斷修改、去完善，就一些前人的不足作補完。人大釋法亦都如是，我相信重點是我們希望這法列在微調後能得到愈來愈多香港人的支持，這才是一個成功的新詮釋。

7. 你們是否同意一國兩制？
我們支持所有在香港回歸時所簽訂的條文，其中當然包括一國兩制。

8. 你們是否支持國歌法和23條立法？
因為爭議聲非常之多，所以我們不希望對任何未實施或未明文規定的法例作出過多評論。這是對該法案有所偏頗，該法案到最後還有很多相議的空間，所以我們認為政府應充分考慮各種聲音，從而推出一條為大部分港人所接受的法例。

9. 你們對違法達義有何看法？
香港作為擁有完善法律的城市，任何人都有表達訴求或是行動的權利。我們主張每人都有自由去決定自己的事、想表達的聲音，但每人都應為這些行為勇敢承擔相認的法律責任。當然我們更相信這套法律體系是完善和公平的。

10. 你們對初一事件有何看法？
對旺角騷動，很多報紙傳媒都報道了有不法份子甚至黑社會的介入，所以旺角騷動的那一批示威者是否單純為表達而表達的市民呢？

11. 你們是否同意政府以暴動罪控告參與者？
就對這幾名人士進行拘捕的行為，我們希望香港政府有真憑實據去支持，以及整個審訊過程認該要公平。我希望他們得到公平的審訊。

Campus TV has interviewed with Prism, the Proposed Cabinet of Executive Committee, The Hong Kong University Students’ Union, Session 2019, with regards to their treatment of external affairs. Prism has expressed their stance and opinions on various external issues, which include: their not opposing the Hong Kong government’s banning of the Hong Kong National Party, believing in the government’s legitimacy for the disqualification of legislators, believing in the involvement of gangs in the Mong Kok Incident of 2016, and expressing their confidence in the current legal system.

The interview excerpts are as follows:

1. Where do you stand on the political spectrum? / How would you define your political stance?
We believe the current word items are unable to express our Cabinet’s political stance. For example, if you consider the term localism or Hong Kong independence, these groups have not a clear boundary or universal definition given by the society. Whether it be the political spectrum or political stance, us who are Hong Kong-ers or who have been educated in Hong Kong, have a tendency to think from the standpoint of Hong Kong. If we consider the benefits from the standpoint of Hong Kong, we also need to consider the timeline. This (the timeline) means, that we should consider if these benefits are of short term or long term. Therefore, when considering Hong Kong’s benefits, we should also consider the policies and bills of neighbouring countries. Therefore, if we had to define our political stance in terms, it would be “international perspective that comes from a local standpoint”. The former is a consideration to the benefits, the latter is a consideration to the execution.

2. Do you support Hong Kong independence?
Firstly, we think this matter could be discussed freely, especially within the premises of the University. In terms of agreeing with Hong Kong independence, we think that Hong Kong independence is currently not the best option to be executed in Hong Kong, because there are still many other options to consider and discuss about. In addition, I think that Hong Kong’s internal affairs are very severe, like the external affairs that are mentioned in our campaign booklet, for example, students’ suicides, rising property prices, the severely outdated innovation and technology. These are problems that our internal department has to confront and resolve, therefore we put these internal affairs as our priority.

3. Do you think that Hong Kong independence is legal?
We believe any discussion that is in compliance with the law is acceptable. Therefore, we think that under the current, comprehensive legal system, with no breaching of the law, a person or group should be allowed to speak their thoughts on different issues.

4. Do you agree with Hong Kong government’s banning of the Hong Kong National Party?
Firstly, we believe that Hong Kong’s rule of law is still quite comprehensive. Therefore, we do not have much hesitation nor opposition for a judgment that is based on what we consider to be an intact judicial system of Hong Kong. In terms of the banning of the Hong Kong National Party, the society has different voices, but we believe we ought to obey the judgment that comes from what the majority of Hong Kong considers to be a comprehensive legal system.

5. Do you agree with Hong Kong government’s disqualification of legislators?
Actually, we have since the very beginning believed in Hong Kong’s rule of law as quite a frontrunner in the world; this has been backed by some survey organisations within the community too, so we believe that this rule of law can bring out a fair trial. Therefore, in regards to the disqualification of some legislators, we willingly believe that the entirety of the judgment process has been fair, with sufficient arguments to back up the government’s verdict. We do not express any special opinions towards this incident.

6. Do you support the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress’ Interpretation of the Basic Law (SCNPC's Interpretation of BL, or Interpretation of the Basic Law by the SCNPC)?
For the enactment of every legislation, it starts from a small portion of elites that begin to build its (the legislation’s) framework, it then continues to be improved as society grows. For this reason, the law is not a printed book, it allows us to continually amend, better, and complete items that are left neglected or faulted by predecessors. This applies for the SCNPC's Interpretation of BL, I believe the most important thing is, we hope to gain more Hong Kong-ers’ support under these fine-tunings (by the SCNPC's Interpretation of BL), we think this is what counts as a successful re-interpretation of the law.

7. Do you agree with the constitutional principle of “one country, two systems”?
We support all the terms that were signed in the Handover of Hong Kong, and this definitely includes the principle of “one country, two systems”.

8. Do you support the National Anthem Bill and the enactment of Article 23?
Due to the many controversies on this matter, we do not wish to comment on any legislation that has yet to be implemented or stipulated in explicit terms. This would be a prejudice on the said bill(s). These bills still have a lot of room for negotiation, so we believe the government should consider different voices, so as to introduce a legislation that is accepted by the majority of Hong Kong-ers.

9. What are your views on the idea of achieving justice by violating the law?
Hong Kong is a city with a comprehensive legal system; anyone has the right to express their own appeal or action. We advocate that everyone has the freedom to decide for their own deeds and express their own thoughts, but everyone should also be responsible to bear the consequences of their actions. Needless to say, we definitely believe that our legal system is perfect and fair.

10. What are your views on the Mong Kok Incident in 2016?
With regards to the Mong Kok unrest, many media sources have reported about the involvement of many illegal parties, and even that of gangs or triads. So, are the demonstrators in the Mong Kok unrest really with pure intentions to speak up, for the sake of expressing themselves as Hong Kong citizens?

11. Do you agree with the government’s decision to charge participants (of the Mong Kok Incident in 2016) with the offence of rioting?
With regards to the arrest of those participants, we hope that the Hong Kong government has had solid evidence to support (their arrest), and that the trial process has been fair. I hope they receive a fair trial.
___________________________________

二零一九年度香港大學學生會周年大選其他候選人包括候選常務秘書麥嘉晉、校園電視候選內閣、學苑候選編輯委員會及候選普選評議員。

2019年度周年大選中央諮詢大會將於一月二十一日至一月二十五日在中山廣場舉行，時間為下午十二時半至二時半。

Other candidates for the Annual Election 2019 include the Proposed General Secretary Mak Ka Chun Eugene, the Proposed Cabinet of Campus TV, the Proposed Editorial Board of Undergrad, and the Proposed Popularly Elected Union Councillor.

The Central Campaign for Annual Election 2019 will be held from the 21st to 25th of January at the Sun Yat-sen Place, from 12:30 to 14:30.

2021/04/02生命紀實與創作
「那個南宋間唱佛的妓女，
與周邦彥」
（小無相公；John 3)
「A Hooker from 966 years ago make gospel music and praise to Buddha、 Li Shi Shi」
/.原著 王大喜

*Temple Worl. /.Origin Nocole Marks
*參考所有「仙人指路」第六個段子「無形無相、諸法刑天」 /.原著王大喜

*註：今日章節
「耶穌說：「我實實在在地告訴你，人若不是從水和 聖 靈生的，就不能進神的國。 從肉身生的就是肉身；從靈生的就是靈。 我說：『你們必須重生』，你不要以為希奇。 風隨着意思吹，你聽見風的響聲，卻不曉得從哪裏來，往哪裏去；凡從 聖 靈生的，也是如此。」

因為神差他的兒子降世，不是要定世人的罪 ，乃是要叫世人因他得救。 信他的人，不被定罪；不信的人，罪已經定了，因為他不信神獨生子的名。 光來到世間，世人因自己的行為是惡的，不愛光，倒愛黑暗，定他們的罪就是在此。」
‭‭約翰福音‬ ‭3:5-8, 17-19‬ ‭CUNP-神‬‬

*Note:
Daily chapter、
「Jesus answered, “Very truly I tell you, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless they are born of water and the Spirit. Flesh gives birth to flesh, but the Spirit gives birth to spirit. You should not be surprised at my saying, ‘You must be born again.’ The wind blows wherever it pleases. You hear its sound, but you cannot tell where it comes from or where it is going. So it is with everyone born of the Spirit.”
For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son. This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil.」
‭‭John‬ ‭3:5-8, 17-19‬ ‭NIV‬‬

*註：
2020/08/08工作筆記
「來自夢中的老和尚，時空的金球」之，「仙人指路」第七段，
「但丁，神曲」即「以太元神（莊稼神），祈天曲（祈災曲）」。
（第一段會在YouTube中最後一次試水溫，第二段後會暫時放在我的app中）

註：
「仙人指路」段子：
［作者/ .夢中的老和尚 x 王大喜］
一、
1.啟敬。
2.起還。
3.承天、不起名。
四、性命相消。（性格的融合）
五、游龍擺尾。
（上下弦最大值上下正負弦相消）
六、諸法刑天。（不來不去大圓滿）
七、以太元神。（祈災曲，以身體為介質，連結自然，與人製造的共同業力還與大地，使其平衡，發聲的自動訓練）
（此系列生命紀錄於Nicole Marks “Golden Purify Work”後的生命紀實）

Dream Walker™: RastaWang.com
（夢行者,™，醒夢人）

《第75創業知識： 哈佛分享 - Mentoring vs Coaching — 記住要 Coach Up! 》領袖最忌什麼? 

從前有個年輕人，成日去打 tennis 喎， 有一日食飯撞到學校老師 ，mentoring 及coaching 有何分別? 答案在片內:

.................. 

全文:

從前有個年輕人，成日去打 tennis 喎， 有一日食飯撞到學校老師 ，就同阿老師講：

「我最鐘意打Tennis. 我隻手呢點樣Swing法, 我對腳呢就點樣跑法， 我呢就用咗乜嘢乜嘢嘅策略應付咗個對手。」

老師聽到就講：

「哦哦哦，咁犀利呀，你都真係幾有天份，打得唔錯喎！ 第時可以做球星。」

第二日， 呢個年輕人落場再打波， 啱啱好係網球場道撞到個老師。 老師一睇佢打波，嘩， 亂咁飛，亂咁走， 球球個波都飛上天，仲乜事呀，咁渣㗎？！ 年輕人仲唔覺得有咩問題喎！ 問下老師：

「我打成點呀？」

老師就話：

「Oh my god！ 你呢啲叫做打Tennis 呀? 你呢啲叫做同個波打交呀！ 其實我都曾經攞網球全港冠軍㗎，打波，你應該點點點點點點點！

不過， 我退役之後就去咗教 leadership 領袖才能。 除了打Tennis 以外，咁你而家明唔明，咩叫做mentoring，咩叫做coaching呢 ？ 」

尋日我先至係公司有個training，和同事分享關於我係哈佛學咗啲乜嘢leadership 知識。 

其中Leaderrship 有好重要嘅，就係識得分辦mentoring 同埋 coaching. 中文我都唔係好肯定點譯， 驚譯錯反而搞亂意思。

根據哈佛教授Robert Kaplan ， 做一個好嘅領袖需要 coaching，遠遠多過mentoring。佢話 Mentoring is by telling, coaching is by watching. 

Mentoring 就係我同你講我做咗啲咩咩

。可以講到天花龍鳳，但你一睇我點做嘅話，就知道我冇料到。Coaching, 作為我教練嘅話你一定會睇住我點做，再同我講， 甚至乎示範畀我睇點樣能夠做得好啲。教授話作為好嘅領袖，timely， specific 同埋 actionable 嘅 Coaching 遠遠重要過 Mentoring. 

大部分老闆，都知道要Coach Down, 即係同下屬講點做點做得更好。 但教授話，可惜只有好少嘅老闆識得 coach up, 即係問下屬佢自己做成點? 有乜不足之處? 畀個機會下屬去改善自己、coach 返自己，coach up!  因為無人係清楚過嗰個下屬自己點做嘢。 最清楚嘅人，就係圍繞著自己身邊做嘢嘅人，呢啲就係你最好嘅coach. 

問心，你又有幾可coach 人地， 或你又有幾可叫人哋coach你呢? Actively coach others and seek coaching. Coach down and coach up，咁先至可以互相改善。 叫你寫自己嘅強處，你好快寫到。寫自己的弱處，可能要諗多陣。但你叫人哋寫你嘅弱處，就可能發發聲寫曬出嚟。 爭在你知唔知啫！

唔好等到年底review 先講，太遲啦。 到時只係一個verdict 判決。我淨係想你講我點好點好，升職加薪。千祈唔好講我啲咩衰嘢，變成一個藉口唔加我人工。我最憎嘅！ 有嘢要改善，就早響。 唔響？ 你就唔好過咗成年先講，咁你就係個差領袖。

做Leader, 最忌最忌就係 isolation 被孤立。 有啲嘢，全世界都知， 個個人都喺度講，但就係你唔知。要breakthrough isolation, 記住記住要coach up。即係上司經常主動問下屬自己做成點， 自己有咩改善嘅地方， from down to up，因為冇人會清楚得過你身邊同你一直合作嘅人。佢哋就係你最好嘅 Coach 教練。

亦都係因為咁，啱啱個老師都會問：

「Oh by the way, 臨走前，我啱啱同你講打波嗰度有啲咩解釋得唔清楚？ 我態度點呀？ 畀個意見我，點樣可以下次講得好啲呀？」

呢個，就係seeking coach up 啦。我點解成日講咁多理論？我專做舖，我都好想我啲租客做個更加好嘅領袖，佢生意好啲，做業主都好。 今日記住問下你嘅下屬你做成點啦！ 問咗？ 請留個言俾我！ 我一定覆你。