關於 water resources and economics ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

[Tổng hợp] 5 học bổng Trung Quốc đang mở cho năm học 2021-2022

Trung Quốc hiện đang mở rất nhiều học bổng cho sinh viên quốc tế cả nhà ơi. Học bổng từ trường cũng có mà học bổng chính phủ cũng vô số nhiều.

Một trong số đó là học bổng Chính phủ Trung Quốc (Chinese Scholarship Council - CSC), bao gồm tất cả các chi phí được đài thọ từ A đến Z bởi bộ Giáo dục Trung Quốc. CSC tìm kiếm sinh viên và học giả từ khắp nơi trên thế giới nhằm tăng cường sự trao đổi và hợp tác giữa Trung Quốc và các nước trong lĩnh vực giáo dục, khoa học và công nghệ, văn hóa, kinh tế và thương mại. Lưu ngay bài viết để không bỏ qua bất kì thông tin học bổng nào từ Page nhé!

1. Renmin University CSC Scholarships 2021
- Bậc học: sau đại học
- Không yêu cầu IELTS
- Học bổng: toàn phần (học phí + chỗ ở + bảo hiểm y tế + sinh hoạt phí hàng tháng)
- Deadline: tháng 3.2021
- Link: http://iso.ruc.edu.cn/English/more.php?cid=131

2. Lingnan University scholarships
- Bậc học: MPhil/PhD
- Ngành học: Business, Chinese, Cultural Studies, Economics, English, Environmental Science (MPhil program only), History, Philosophy, Political Science, Psychology, Sociology and Social Policy, Translation, Visual Studies
- Học bổng: học phí + chỗ ăn ở + chi phí sinh hoạt...
- Deadline: 01.12.2020 hoặc 22.01.2021
- Link: https://www.ln.edu.hk/admissions/ug/overseas/apply/admission-requirements

3. Tianjin University CSC Scholarships 2021-2022
- Bậc học: đại học, sau đại học
- Ngành học: Economics, Law, Science, Agriculture, Medicine, Art, Literature, Engineering, Management, Education, History, philosophy
- Học bổng: học phí + chỗ ở + bảo hiểm y tế + sinh hoạt phí hàng tháng + một số phí khác
- Deadline: 21.03.2021
- Link: http://www.tju.edu.cn/english/index.htm

4. Guangdong Polytechnic of Water Resources and Electric Engineering International Student Scholarship
- Học bổng: cover học phí
- Deadline: 30.12.2020
- Link: http://gdsdxy.admissions.cn/news/scholarship-at-guangdong-polytechnic-of-water-resources-and-electric-engineering_2826.html

5. Tsinghua University CSC Scholarship in China 2021
- Bậc học: đại học, sau đại học
- Học bổng: học phí + chỗ ở + bảo hiểm y tế + sinh hoạt phí hàng tháng
- Deadline: 27.11.2020 (cử nhân) & 15.12.2020 (sau đại học)
- Link: http://international.join-tsinghua.edu.cn
http://gradadmission.tsinghua.edu.cn/f/yzlxs/yz_lxs_kstzb/view?id=500079

🌍 Các bạn muốn chuẩn bị xin học bổng, xin việc thực tốt đừng quên các lớp học bổng HannahED, chương trình Mentor 1-1, review hồ sơ, tập phỏng vấn HannahEd luôn sẵn sàng để hỗ trợ các bạn tối đa với các nội dung từ a=> z về tìm học bổng, làm hồ sơ trong đó có cả viết CV, essay í:
http://tiny.cc/HannahEdClassInfo
Link thông tin về lớp:
https://hannahed.co/lop-tim-va-nop-hoc-bong/
❤ Share và tag bạn bè để không lỡ thông tin hay nhé ❤

#HannahEd #duhoc #hocbong #sanhocbong #scholarshipforVietnamesestudents

See No Elephant, Only Conspiracies (Lee Yee)

Yesterday, Legislative Council (LegCo) member Eddie Chu Hoi-dick posted on his Facebook page that he originally shared my idea before changing his mind to support the primary election and eventually participated in it. His response was that the primary election is essential regardless of whether there will be a large-scale disqualification of candidates. He further said that the best defense against disqualification is not to fear it. One of the reasons for his continual support of the primary election, he continued, is to use it to establish a consensus of opposition that fundamentally opposes the National Security Law (NSL).

If that is the plan, then the NSL must be the main topic of discussion in the primary election forum. According to Tanya Chan, convener of the pan-democratic camp, different political parties can only respond either by support or objection to the NSL under the shadow of possible disqualification. Therefore, the forum topic must revolve around whether to oppose the NSL. However, should a candidate disapprove of the NSL if it is almost certain to guarantee disqualification? If the candidate is successfully elected into the Legislative Council, under the threat of the NSL, should the candidate or its party succumb to the NSL irrespective of the rights of Hongkongers or stand up to it? Only if the primary election focuses primarily on this topic, then it will be possible to fulfill Chu’s wish: to use the primary election to build a consensus of opposition that fundamentally opposes the NSL.

Having watched two primary election debates, the topic of NSL was only gently touched upon. In fact, many candidates did not mention sensitive topics that could lead to disqualification and put them in a dilemma. Most of them mentioned how they would unite and strive to win more than 35 seats which would put them in the majority, whether parliamentary resistance will be integrated with the fights on the street, whether they would oppose next year’s budget to force the Chief Executive to step down. There are also candidates who attacked the track records of the Democratic Party and the Hong Kong Association for Democracy and People's Livelihood (ADPL). The atmosphere of the forums did not bring about a sense of urgency on the NSL’s impending threat to our freedom and security, and its imminent destruction of “One Country, Two System.” The intention to initiate a consensus of opposition against NSL seems buoyant.

At the pan-democratic primary election forum, the NSL was like an elephant in the room, so obvious but unseen by the candidates. The NSL descends upon us, yet the LegCo primary election was unaffected and indifferent as though Hong Kong is just running a peaceful election where everyone fights for a seat in the LegCo and as though those who successfully win the primary election would be guaranteed a seat. Pro-democrats did not see the elephant in the room but they saw the whimsical conspiracies of other candidates.

Before Yuen Gongyi went to the United States to lobby for the rights and interests of Hongkongers, he posted on YouTube and unexpectedly gained mass popularity. He speaks bluntly, and his goals and all action plans are disclosed candidly online. Many netizens find his messages agreeable and admire him for standing up and taking action for Hongkongers. I rather think Yuen is quite a naive optimist, nevertheless I do agree with his fundamental ideologies. He previously criticized a pan-democrat which set off a conspiracy theory attack upon him within the pan-democrat discussion circle. They merely wondered from where he suddenly emerged and, like all conspiracy theories in the past, this was also based on no evidence. It got even more peculiar in recent days, when it has been theorize that his anti-CCP speeches were means to support the campaign of his slightly more, and evidently, pro-CCP son. Though they share the same blood, even the wildest imagination would not be linking the two’s political stances. All the more so when the son stated on radio that his father is a tragedy.

To the conspiracy of her father campaigning for the son, Erica Yuen responded with a laugh, and said, “We must vote out the conservative, old pan-democrats and the successors of these old pan-democratic directions. They’re extremely scary, can’t even take a single word of criticism, never admitting faults, and forever misjudging and falling behind situations. They only know how to spin their own fallacies and point fingers at fellow teammates.”

The financial columnist, Muddy Dirty Water, wrote on his Facebook page that, “This is simple economics, because they see Daddy Yuen as a competitor who has also robbed them of many interests.” “The pan-dem mechanism has been carrying out their international work and lobbying through crowdfunding, but Daddy Yuen funded his own flights, and used his own resources to secure the more influential people in the US, such as Bannon, which is unlike a simple newspaper ad. The pan-dem mechanism naturally can’t stand it.”

Seeing no elephant but only the seats; seeing no teammates but only conspiracies – perhaps this is just some slim pickings, but again, one rotten apple can spoil the whole bunch.