關於 you never know用法 ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

=================================
「Suck」の使用はタブー？
=================================
　
英語の「Suck」といえば、本来は「吸う」や「しゃぶる」などを意味し、性的な意味合いもあることから使用を避けられがちかと思いますが、ネイティブの日常会話では、いかがわしい意味以外のスラングとしても非常に頻繁に使われている単語なので、今日はその用法について触れていこうと思います。
　
　
～suckの本来の意味～
　
suckは本来、「吸う」や「しゃぶる」、「なめる」を意味する単語です。例えば、「ストローで吸う」は“Suck on a straw.”、「ペロペロキャンディーをなめる」は“Suck on a lollipop.”、「私の息子は親指をしゃぶります」は“My son sucks his thumb.”と言います。その他、“Vacuum cleaners suck dust from the floor.”のように、掃除機が床のホコリを吸い取る意味でも使えます。
　
　
～日常会話で使われるsuckの意味と用法～
　
--------------------------------------------------
1) ____ sucks
→「ひどい / 最悪 / つまらない」
--------------------------------------------------
　
suckは「ひどい」「最悪」「つまらない」の意味でよく使われる口語的な表現です。例えば、「この料理は最悪だ」は“This food sucks.”、「この映画はつまらない」は“That movie sucks.”、「私の仕事は最悪だ」は“My job sucks.”のように表現します。一般的に“____ sucks”の形式が使われます。
　
＜例文＞
　
That restaurant has a nice vibe, but the food sucks.
（あのレストランは雰囲気はいいけど、料理がひどいよ。）
　
I don't get what the hype is all about. I thought that movie sucked.
（なんであの映画がすごく話題になっているのか分からない。僕はあの映画は最悪だと思ったんだけどね。）
　
My job sucks. It doesn't pay well and I have to work long hours.
（私の仕事は最悪です。給料は安いし、長時間働かないといけない。）
　
　
--------------------------------------------------
2) That sucks
→「それはひどいね / 残念だね / ついてないね」
--------------------------------------------------
　
“That sucks.”は「それはひどいね」や「残念だね」、「ついてないね」を意味し、不幸や災難といった悪い出来事に対する同情を表す表現として使われるインフォーマルなフレーズです。
　
✔友人のペットや誰かが亡くなった場合など深刻なシーンでの使用は非常に失礼にあたるので避けましょう。その場合は、“I'm very sorry.”や“I'm sorry to hear that.”を使うようにしましょう。
　
＜例文＞
　
The tickets sold out? That sucks.
（チケットが売り切れ？ついていないね。）
　
I can't believe your flight got delayed for 8 hours. That sucks.
（飛行機が8時間も遅れるなんて信じられない。ホント、ありえないよね。）
　
That sucks. If I were you, I would have complained to the manager.
（それはひどい。私だったらマネージャーに文句を言ってるよ。）
　
〜会話例1〜
A: I just needed one more point to pass! It's so frustrating.
（あと1点で合格だったのに！悔しいよ。）

B: Ah man, that sucks.
（あー、それは残念だね。）
　
〜会話例2〜
A: I was supposed to study abroad in Vancouver this year, but it got canceled because of the coronavirus.
（今年はバンクーバーに留学する予定だったのにコロナで中止になっちゃったよ。）

B: Are you serious? That sucks. Hopefully, you can go next year.
（マジで？それは最悪。来年は行けるといいね。）
　
〜会話例3〜
A: It was raining the whole time I was there. It was terrible.
（旅行中、ずっと雨だったよ。最悪だった。）

B: Wow, that sucks. I had a similar experience when I went to Thailand last year.
（それはついてないね。私も去年タイに行った時、同じような経験をしたよ。）
　
　
--------------------------------------------------
3) Suck(s) at ____
→「〜が下手 / 〜が苦手」
--------------------------------------------------
　
suckはスポーツや楽器が「下手」、学校の科目が「苦手」と表現する時にも使うことができ、その場合は“suck at ____”の形式が使われます。例えば、「私はビリヤードが下手です」は“I suck at pool.”、「彼は運転が下手です」は“He sucks at driving.”、「彼女は絵を描くのが苦手です」は“She sucks at drawing.”のように表現します。
　
ちなみに、「君は下手くそだな」と言いたい時はシンプルに“You suck!”と言います。“You suck!”は状況によって、「君は役立たずだ」や「あなたは最低だ」の意味になることもあるので、状況に応じて判断しましょう。
　
✔「（彼は）〜が下手」→「(He) sucks at _____」
　
✔「（彼は）へたくそ」→「(He) sucks!」
　
＜例文＞
　
I suck at cooking. I go to the convenience store or order on Uber Eats every day.
（私は料理が下手なので、毎日コンビニに行くかUber Eatsで注文します。）
　
He seriously sucks at driving. Honestly, he shouldn't be on the road. It's hazardous.
（彼は運転が本当に下手。正直、彼は運転しない方がいいと思う。危険だよ。）
　
Is she really a professional singer? She sucks. She can't carry a tune.
（彼女は本当にプロの歌手なの？下手くそだね。音痴だよ。）
　
I suck at cooking. The only thing I can make is cup noodles.
（私は料理が下手です。カップ麺くらいしか作れません。）
　
I suck at math. I never liked math ever since I was a kid.
（私は数学が苦手です。子供の時からずっと数学は嫌いでした。）
　
He really sucks. He needs more practice.
（彼はホントに下手くそだね。もっと練習しないといけないよ。）
　
　
--------------------------------------------------
4) Suck it up
→「我慢しなさい」
--------------------------------------------------
　
“suck it up”は「我慢しなさい」を意味する口語的な言い方です。特にグダグダと愚痴をこぼしたり弱音を吐いている人に対して使われることが多く、文句を言わずに「我慢してやりなさい、終わらせないさい、なんとかしなさい」といった意味になります。“suck it up”は必ずこの組み合わせで使われるので、このまま覚えましょう。
　
＜例文＞
　
Look. I know you're exhausted, but suck it up. We have to finish this by today.
（クタクタに疲れているのは分かってるけど、我慢して。今日中に終わらせないといけないので）
　
My leg cramped up during the marathon, but I sucked it up and finished the race.
（マラソン中に足がつりましたが、我慢して完走しました。）
　
Don't put off your project. Just suck it up and finish tonight.
（プロジェクトを後回しにしない。つべこべ言わないで言わないで今夜中に終わらせない）
　
〜会話例〜
A: It's too hot. I don't want to do this anymore.
（暑すぎる。もうやりたくないよ。）

B: Suck it up. We're almost done. Let's finish up.
（もうすぐ終わるんだから我慢しなよ。終わらせよう。）
　
　
　
　
　
ブログ記事URL：https://hapaeikaiwa.com/?p=11154
～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～
　
無料メルマガ『1日1フレーズ！生英語』配信中！
　
通勤・通学などのちょとした合間を利用して英語が学べるメルマガ『1日1フレーズ！生英語』を平日の毎朝6時に配信中！ただ単にフレーズを紹介しているだけではなく、音声を使った学習プロセスが組み込まれているので、メルマガを読むこと自体が学習方法！
　
https://hapaeikaiwa.com/mailmagazine/
　
～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～

毋忘五大訴求　公民抗命有理
—10‧20九龍遊行陳情書
（案件編號：DCCC 535/2020）

——————————————————
「毋忘初衷，活在愛和真實之中」
撐阿銘，即訂閱Patreon：
patreon.com/raphaelwong
—————————————————

胡法官雅文閣下：

　　2012年，我第一次站在法庭上承認違反「公安惡法」，述說對普選的盼望，批評公安惡法不義，並因公民抗命的緣故，甘心樂意接受刑罰。當年我說，如果小圈子選舉沒有被廢除，惡法沒有消失，我依然會一如故我，公民抗命，並且我相信將會有更多學生和市民加入這個行列。想不到時至今日，普選仍然遙遙無期，我亦再次被帶到法庭接受審判，但只是短短７年，已經有數十萬計的群眾公民抗命，反對暴政。今日，我承認違反「未經批准的政府」所訂立「未經批准的惡法」之下的「未經批准集結」罪，我不打算尋求法庭的憐憫，但請容許我佔用法庭些微時間陳情，讓法庭在判刑前有全面考慮。

暴力之濫觴

　　在整個反修例運動如火如荼之際，我正承擔另一宗公民抗命案件的刑責。雖然身在獄中，但仍然心繫手足。我在獄中電視機前見證6月9日、6月16日及8月18日三次百萬港人大遊行，幾多熱愛和平的港人冒天雨冒彈雨走上街頭，抗議不義惡法，今日關於10月20日的案件，亦是如此。可能有人會問，政府已在6月暫緩修例，更在9月正式撤回修例，我等仍然繼續示威，豈非無理取鬧？我相信法官閣下肯定聽過「遲來的正義並非正義」（Justice delayed is justice denied）這句格言。當過百萬群眾走上街頭，和平表達不滿的時候，林鄭政府沒有理睬，反而獨行獨斷，粗暴踐踏港人的意願，結果製造出後來連綿不絕的爭拗，甚至你死我活的對抗。經歷眾多衝突痛苦之後，所謂暫緩撤回，已經微不足道，我們只是更加清楚：沒有民主，就連基本人權都不會擁有！

　　在本案之中，雖然我們都沒有鼓動或作出暴力行為，但根據早前8‧18及10‧1兩宗案件，相信在控方及法庭眼中，案發當日的暴力事件仍然可以算在我們頭上，如此，我有必要問：如果香港有一個公平正義的普及選舉，人民可以在立法會直接否決他們不認可的法律，試問2019年的暴力衝突可以從何而來呢？如果我們眼見的暴力是如此十惡不赦，那麼我們又如何看待百萬人遊行後仍然堅持推行惡法的制度暴力呢？如果我們不能接受人民暴力反抗，那麼我們是否更加不能對更巨大更壓逼的制度暴力沈默不言？真正且經常發生的暴力，是漠視人民訴求的暴力，是踐踏人民意見的暴力，是剝奪人民表達權利的暴力。真正憎恨暴力，痛恨暴力的人，不可能一方面指摘暴力反抗，又容忍制度暴力。如果我需要承擔和平遊行引發出來的暴力事件的刑責，那麼誰應該承擔施政失敗所引發出來的社會騷亂的罪責呢？

社會之病根

　　對於法庭而言，可能2019年所發生的事情只是一場社會騷亂，務必追究違法者個人責任。然而，治亂治其本源，醫病醫其病根，我雖然公民抗命，刻意違法，控方把我帶上法庭，但我卻不應被理解為一個「犯罪個體」。2019年所發生的事情，並不是我一個人或我們這幾位被告可以促成，社會問題的癥結不是「犯罪份子」本身，而是「犯罪原因」。我明白「治亂世用重典」的道理，但如果「殺雞儆猴」是解決方法，就不會在2016年發生旺角騷亂及2017年上訴庭對示威者施以重刑後，2019年仍然會爆發出更大規模的暴力反抗。

如果不希望社會動亂，就必須正本清源，逐步落實「五大訴求」，從根本上改革，挽回民心。2019年反修例運動，其實只是2014年雨傘運動的延續而已，縱使法庭可能認為兩個運動皆是「一股歪風」所引起，但我必須澄清，兩個運動的核心就是追求民主普選，人民當家作主。在2019年11月24日區議會選舉這個最類近全民普選的選舉中，接近300萬人投票，民主派大勝，奪得17個區議會主導權，這就是整個反修例運動的民意，民意就是反對政府決策，反對制度暴力，反對推行惡法，不容爭辯，不辯自明。我們作為礦場裡的金絲雀，多次提醒政府撤回修法，並從根本上改革制度，而在10月20日的九龍遊行當然是反映民意的平台契機。如今，法庭對我們施加重刑，其實只不過是懲罰民意，將金絲雀困在鳥籠之內，甚至扼殺於鼓掌之中，窒礙表達自由。

堅持之重要

　　大運動過後的大鎮壓，使我們失去《蘋果日報》，失去教協，失去民陣，不少民主派領袖以及曾為運動付出的手足戰友都囚於獄中，不少曾經熱情投入運動的朋友亦因《國安法》的威脅轉為低調，新聞自由示威自由日漸萎縮，公民社會受到沈重打擊，我亦失去不少摯友，有感傷孤獨的時候，但我仍然相信，2019年香港人的信念，以及所展現人類的光輝持久未變。我不會忘記百萬人民冒雨捱熱抗拒暴政，抵制惡法，展現我們眾志成城；我不會忘記人潮紅海，讓道救護車，展現我們文明精神；我不會忘記年青志士直接行動反對苛政，捨身成仁，展現我們膽色勇氣；我不會忘記銀髮一族走上街頭保護年青人，展現我們彼此關懷；我不會忘記「五大訴求」，不會忘記2019年區議會選舉，展現我們有理有節。

　　法官閣下，我對於當日的所作所為，不感羞恥，毫無悔意。我能夠在出獄後與群眾同行一路，與戰友同繫一獄，實是莫大榮幸。若法治失去民主基石，將使法庭無奈地接受專制政權所訂立解釋的法律限制，隨時變成政治工具掃除異見，因此爭取民主普選，建設真正法治，追求公平正義，仍然是我的理想。在這條路上，如有必要，我仍然會公民抗命，正如終審法院海外非常任法官賀輔明（Lord Hoffmann）所言，發自良知的公民抗命有悠久及光榮的傳統，歷史將證明我們是正確的。我期望，曾與我一起遊行抗命的手足戰友要堅持信念，在艱難歲月裡毋忘初衷，活在愛和真實之中。

　　最後，如9年前一樣，我想借用美國民權領袖馬丁路德金牧師的一番話對我們的反對者說：「我們將以自己忍受苦難的能力，來較量你們製造苦難的能力。我們將用我們靈魂的力量，來抵禦你們物質的暴力。對我們做你們想做的事吧，我們仍然愛你們。我們不能憑良心服從你們不公正的法律，因為拒惡與為善一樣是道德責任。將我們送入監獄吧，我們仍然愛你們。」（We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you.）

　　願慈愛的主耶穌賜我們平安，與我和我一家同在，與法官閣下同在，與香港人同在。沒有暴徒，只有暴政；五大訴求，缺一不可！願榮耀歸上帝，榮光歸人民！

第五被告
黃浩銘
二零二一年八月十九日

Lest we forget the five demands: civil disobedience is morally justified
- Statement on 10‧20 Kowloon Rally
(Case No.: DCCC 535/2020)

Your Honour Judge Woodcock

In 2012, I stood before the court and admitted to violating the "Public Security Evil Law". I expressed my hope for universal suffrage, criticized the evil law as unjust, and willingly accepted the penalty for civil disobedience. Back then, I said that if the small-circle election had not been abolished and the draconian law had not disappeared, I would still be as determined as I was, and I believe that more students and citizens would join this movement. Today, universal suffrage is still a long way off, and I have been brought before the court again for trial. But in just seven years, hundreds of thousands of people have already risen up in civil disobedience against tyranny. Today, I plead guilty to "unauthorised assembly" under an unapproved evil law enacted by an unauthorised government. I do not intend to seek the court's mercy, but please allow me to take up a little time in court to present my case so that the court can consider all aspects before sentencing me.

The roots of violence

At the time when the whole anti-extradition law movement was in full-swing, I was taking responsibility for another civil disobedience case. Although I was in prison, my heart was still with the people. I witnessed the three million-person rallies on 9 June, 16 June and 18 August on television in prison, when many peace-loving people took to the streets despite the rain and bullets, to protest against unjust laws. Some people may ask, "The Government has already suspended the legislative amendments in June and formally withdrew the bill in September, but we are still demonstrating, are we not being unreasonable?" I am sure your Honour has heard of the adage "Justice delayed is justice denied". When more than a million people took to the streets to express their discontent peacefully, the Lam administration ignored them and instead acted arbitrarily, brutally trampling on the wishes of the people of Hong Kong, resulting in endless arguments and even confrontations. After so many conflicts and painful experiences, the so-called moratorium is no longer meaningful. We only know better: without democracy, we cannot even have basic human rights!

In this case, although we did not instigate or commit acts of violence, I believe that in the eyes of the prosecution and the court, the violence on the day of the incident can still be counted against us, based on the August 18 and October 1 case. And now I must ask - If Hong Kong had a fair and just universal election, and the public could directly veto laws they did not approve of at the Legislative Council, then how could the violent clashes of 2019 have come about? If the violence we see is so heinous, how do we feel about the institutional violence that insists on the imposition of draconian laws even after millions of people have taken to the streets? If we cannot accept violent rebellion, how can we remain silent in the face of even greater and more oppressive institutional violence? The true and frequent violence is the kind of violence that ignores people's demands, that tramples on their opinions, that deprives them of their right to express themselves. People who truly hate violence and abhor it cannot accuse violent resistance on the one hand and tolerate institutional violence on the other. If I have to bear the criminal responsibility for the violence caused by the peaceful demonstration, then who should bear the criminal responsibility for the social unrest caused by failed administration?

The roots of society's problems

From a court's point of view, it may be that what happened in 2019 was just a series of social unrest, and that those who broke the law must be held personally accountable. What happened in 2019 was not something that I alone or the defendants could have made possible, and the crux of the social problem was not the 'criminals' but the 'causes of crime'. I understand the concept of " applying severe punishment to a troubled world", but if "decimation" was really the solution, there would not have been more violent rebellions in 2019 after the Mongkok "riot" in 2016 and the heavy sentences handed down to protesters by the Court of Appeal in 2017.

If we do not want social unrest, we must get to the root of the problem and implement the "five demands" step by step, so as to achieve fundamental reforms and win back the hearts of the people. 2019's anti-revision movement is indeed a continuation of 2014's Umbrella Movement, and even though the court may think that both movements are caused by a "perverse wind", I must clarify that the core of both movements is the pursuit of democracy and universal suffrage, and the people being the masters of their own house. In the District Council election on 24 November 2019, which is the closest thing to universal suffrage, nearly 3 million people voted, and the democratic camp won a huge victory, winning majority in 17 District Councils. As canaries in the monetary coal mine, we have repeatedly reminded the government to withdraw the extradition bill and fundamentally reform the system, and the march in Kowloon on 20 October was certainly an opportunity to reflect public opinion. Now, by imposing heavy penalties on us, the court is only punishing public opinion, trapping the canaries in a birdcage, or even stifling them in the palm of their hands, suffocating the freedom of expression.

The importance of persistence

As a result of the crackdown after the mass movement, we lost Apple Daily, the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, and the Civil Human Rights Front. Many of our democratic leaders and comrades who had contributed to the movement were imprisoned, and many of our friends who had been passionately involved in the movement had been forced to lay low under the threat of the National Security Law. I still believe that the faith of Hong Kong people and the glory of humanity seen in 2019 will remain unchanged. I will never forget the millions of people who braved the rain and the heat to resist tyranny and evil laws, demonstrating our unity of purpose; I will never forget the crowds of people who gave way to ambulances, demonstrating our civility; I will never forget the young people who sacrificed their lives, demonstrating our courage and bravery; I will never forget the silver-haired who took to the streets to protect the youth, demonstrating our care for each other; I will never forget the "five demands" and the 2019 District Council election, demonstrating our rationality and decency.

Your Honour, I have nothing to be ashamed of and no remorse for what I did on that day. It is my great honour to be in prison with my comrades and to be able to walk with the public after my release. If the rule of law were to lose its democratic foundation, the courts would have no choice but to accept the legal restrictions set by the autocratic regime and become a political tool to eliminate dissent at any time. As Lord Hoffmann, a non-permanent overseas judge of the Court of Final Appeal, said, civil disobedience from the conscience has a long and honourable tradition, and history will prove us right. I hope that my comrades in arms who walked with me in protests will keep their faith and live in love and truth in the midst of this difficult time.

Finally, as I did nine years ago, I would like to say something to those who oppose us, borrowing the words of American civil rights leader Reverend Martin Luther King: "We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you."

Peace be with me and my family, with Your Honour, and with the people of Hong Kong. There are no thugs, only tyranny; five demands, not one less! To god be the glory and to people be the glory!

The Fifth Defendant
Wong Ho Ming
19 August 2021

世界烈酒集團帝亞吉歐向來致力於以全球性視野帶領台灣威士忌愛好者探索蘇格蘭單一麥芽威士忌的迷人風味。2017年首度聯手畬室Yu Chocolatier推出四款泥煤威士忌巧克力，其風格鮮明、層次細膩的風味，立馬席捲美食圈造成搶購，其中一款以泰斯卡Talisker 10年單一麥芽威士忌為主角的「胡椒威士忌」，更是以其優雅、細緻而悠長的泥煤風味，與圓潤飽滿的可可香氣於世界巧克力大賽中獲獎。2020年，帝亞吉歐再度聯手畬室Yu Chocolatier推出「高地威士忌巧克力夾心禮盒」，將於2月20日起在畬室Yu Chocolatier獨家販售，引領一場於舌間味蕾中、圓潤可可香氣與豐醇威士忌底蘊的美味風暴。

在英國人的浪漫中，威士忌被喻為生命之水；在電影阿甘正傳(Forrest Gump)中，一句經典台詞「人生有如一盒巧克力，你永遠不知道將嚐到哪種口味。（Life was like a box of chocolates. You never know what you're gonna get.」，是的！巧克力正如生命中不可預料的驚喜，而帝亞吉歐與畬室Yu Chocolatier正是這場驚喜的創作者，以四款高地威士忌巧克力綻放於舌間、璀耀於生命。

Royal Lochnagar夾心巧克力
Royal Lochnagar皇家藍勳酒廠位於南高地區，靠近皇家夏宮巴爾莫勒爾堡的湖畔。自維多利亞女王時代以來，Royal Lochnagar威士忌便一直受到許多君王讚賞，更曾有皇家貴族親臨酒廠參觀並試酒。Royal Lochnagar之所以可以獲得皇家認證，歸功於其淡雅細緻的酒體中堆疊的層層優美香氣，也是許多威士忌行家讚不絕口的威士忌。此款Royal Lochnagar夾心巧克力，以覆盆子明亮的酸度襯托Royal Lochnagar中的果香，巧克力刻意拉低甜度，更加展現威士忌的甜韻。

Oban夾心巧克力
Oban歐本酒廠位於高地西岸，被峭壁與海灣包圍，因此酒款完美結合島嶼區與西高地的威士忌風格。Oban酒廠規模較小，製酒團隊成員僅有7人，卻仍遵循最傳統、繁複的製酒工藝，造就高品質卻產量稀少的酒液。Oban獨特的個性與珍稀性，成為許多資深威士忌行家必收服的酒款之一。此次Oban夾心巧克力為強化其酒體中自帶有柑橘、煙燻、海鹽和蜂蜜的風味，畬室Yu Chocolatier選用台灣椪柑細火熬成果醬，佐搭選用法國頂級給宏德鹽之花。椪柑的精油香氣與Oban的蜂蜜辛香共舞，偶不時透出海洋般的鹹香。

Clynelish夾心巧克力
Clynelish克里尼利基酒廠位於高地區的北部，其豐富層次的香氣與飽滿的口感完美詮釋北高地區威士忌迷人的特色。酒廠最初創立時僅供應酒款給皇家貴族或海外私人客戶，在當時被視為頂級卓越的精品。直至今日，Clynelish依舊對於酒款品質維持最高標準的製酒原則，使其在酒迷的心目中的地位依舊屹立不搖。酒體圓潤、層次細膩是威士忌藏家對Clynelish酒款始終的評價，在Clynelish夾心巧克力中，畬室Yu Chocolatier特別以五款巧克力反覆研製，既保留層次鮮明的可可香氣，卻在焦糖底韻中，併發出Clynelish迷人的花香果韻。

Dalwhinnie夾心巧克力
Dalwhinnie達爾維尼酒廠位於高地區中心，是蘇格蘭海拔最高與最寒冷的地區，酒廠使用的水源來自高山的湖泊或是純淨的融雪，水質冰冷純淨，讓酒體更能快速冷卻以鎖住威士忌的最佳風味，使Dalwhinnie威士忌總帶有清新怡人的風味與滑順甜美的口感。有別於Clynelish酒款的高調，「低調的奢華」更能形容Dalwhinnie的華麗與優雅，六款巧克力的運用，在深黑可可的微苦韻基礎下，宛如建築藝術般的結構，是層層解析的可可香氣、也是層層堆疊的清香氣息，彷彿融合在味蕾中、又似乎獨立於舌間上，是最為華麗的創作。

高地威士忌巧克力夾心禮盒將於2月20日起至3月31日於Yu Chocolatier畬室店上販售，建議售價NT$1,380。如欲了解詳細法式威士忌巧克力禮盒銷售資訊，逕洽尊榮服務專線0800-005-188。

販售地點資訊資訊:
Yu Chocolatier畬室 法式巧克力甜點創作店 (02)2701-0792
店址: 台北市大安區仁愛路4段112巷3弄10號
營業時間:週一~週日12:00~20:00(每週三公休)

我這個外國人沒想過住台灣我也可以做一件事。。。 學英文！
雖然教英文超過十年，講英文更久，來到台灣我才學到這五個英文單字
有的是因為不是美國的用詞有的是因為用這些詞的頻率很低，有的可能只有台灣在用。
來看看你平常講英文會不會用到這些讓外國人對你”哈???“ 的英文單字！

有經常在用嗎？ 留言跟我說～
可以想到別的嗎？ 留言跟我說～
覺得我講的不太對？ 可以走開。。。 開玩笑啦！ 留言跟我說～

很歡迎任何一種反應! 謝謝！！！

***English closed captions on video to come***

I never thought that coming to Taiwan I could do one thing... LEARN ENGLISH!

Even though I've taught English for over 10 years, and spoken it for even longer, I only learned these 5 English vocabulary words after moving to Taiwan.

Some of them I didn't know because they're not used in American English. Some of them I didn't know because we use them VERY rarely in the United States. Some of them may just be used in Taiwan.

Come see if you use these English words that may make a foreigner look at you and go, "Huh???"

Do you use these words often? Comment and tell me!
Do you know any other words like these? Comment and tell me!
Do you think I said something that's not quite correct? Go away... JUST KIDDING! Comment and tell me!

All feedback and opinions are welcome~ Thanks!!!

Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/Brian2Taiwan

Youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/c/Brian2Taiwan

Instagram:
www.instagram.com/Brian2Taiwan

Patreon:
www.patreon.com/Brian2Taiwan

可以用Patreon來捐錢讓我比較好繼續做下去為大家做出這些地方的內容～ 收到的每一毛錢都跟大家說非常感謝～

You can donate to help me keep creating content on all of these pages. Any donations are greatly appreciated!!!

👉歡迎訂閱我的YouTube頻道😊
👉Subscribe to my YouTube channel 😊

#布萊恩 #英文 #錯誤