Some of my thoughts about this report showed as following:
1. Intel still makes 80% of CPUs for personal computers and 94% of them for servers. Its estimated revenue of 2020 maybe about $75 billion USD, and its net income $20.7B.
2. Its major rivalry, AMD, has the estimated revenue of $9.47B, up from $6.73B a year earlier(40.7% growth, YoY) and estimated net income of $1.5B, up from $756M (98% growth,YoY).
It means that every dollar growth in revenue can bring 2.4 dollars growth in net income, which reflects the feature of high-rent-value business. The economic scale decides the gross profit margin.
And this is the reason why Intel enjoys higher marginal rent value than AMD.
3. Besides Intel's dominant area, it had failed in RF and mobile device industry such as its doomed WiMax chipsets and mobile phone SoCs. Now it is facing two major problems: 1) its manufacturing skill has been left behind of TSMC for one or two generations; and 2) its lack of machine-learning products.
In the history, Intel had lost its competition against then Japanese companies in the RAM industry. Intel waived its white flag and turned into the CPU industry in 1980s. However, such successful turning point has never shown again since the launch of its wifi chipset. I do not have enough confidence in its new M&A strategy in the AI field.
4. On the other hand, the TSMC's 2 nm manufacturing advance is not unreachable for Intel. I think the nature physical barriers, like the quantum tunnelling effect, will delay the progress of IC manufacturing after 2nm. Although I've heard and read many issues in its manufacturing team. I still believe Intel's outstanding engineers can get things done after all. It only takes time and money. Nonetheless, this is another big problem. After TSMC having enjoyed monopolistic profits for quite a long time, even Intel could catch up with TSMC after spending about couple years and billions dollars, the remaining rent value will be limited for Intel. I am not sure whether the necessary costs of competition would be covered or not, especially considering that Intel has lost its big client, Apple. Of course, the intense competition would erode TSMC's rent value, too. It's not a good news for TSMC's investors who recently got on the board at such high stock prices.
同時也有10000部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル,也在其Youtube影片中提到,...
「dominant strategy」的推薦目錄:
- 關於dominant strategy 在 元毓 Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於dominant strategy 在 Goodbye HK, Hello UK Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於dominant strategy 在 渾水財經Channel Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於dominant strategy 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於dominant strategy 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於dominant strategy 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於dominant strategy 在 2.2 Dominated Strategies - Introduction to Game Theory: a ... 的評價
dominant strategy 在 Goodbye HK, Hello UK Facebook 的最讚貼文
真.官到無求膽自大
德國聯邦情報局前主管話"Europe must ‘wake up’ "
啱啱退休嘅Gerhard Schindler,係前德國聯邦情報局(Federal Intelligence Service)主管,佢接受訪問嘅時候話中國已經差唔多「征服世界」,而歐洲係時候醒覺(China is close to “world domination” and Europe must wake up to the danger)。
因為中國係德國嘅最大貿易國(€206 billion),所以外交上從來好驚激嬲中國(咁又無指明係邊個啦)。不過直至近期香港嘅情況,德國嘅鷹派就開始抬頭令政府响外交上硬起來,就好似當日接見中國外長訪問嘅時候,德國外交部長啲言語同表情大家見識過啦。
但係Gerhard Schindler咁都係唔夠嘅,亦唔應該因為汽車工業而咁顧忌。
“China is going about things very cleverly, very quietly, but all the same with an astonishingly consistent strategy, and it is a concern that we in Europe hardly notice this dominant behaviour."
(佢地做得好聰明同靜靜雞,不過策略上非常清晰一致(咁希望征服南中國海、非洲至到「新絲綢之路」(New Silk Road)),最慘係好多歐洲國家唔多感覺到呢啲征服行為。)
唔知係咪暗示德國總理呢?不過總理到底係真係唔多覺還是選擇性睇唔到?
“Our stance towards China has been dominated by business relations. We need to reconsider that. We are partly dependent on China, for example with our car industry. But you can’t ease this dependence by becoming more dependent; we should strive to be less dependent.”
(現時我地(德國)嘅立場係希望保持貿易上嘅關係,不過係時候諗清楚係咪仍然正確,例如,德國汽車工業好大部份都係依賴中國市場。想滅甩鋪癮,點都唔會係靠更加依靠啦,反而係用盡方戒吖嗎。)
#近期啲特務頭子零舍多嘴
報導:
《The Times》
Europe must ‘wake up’ to China threat, warns ex-spy chief Gerhard Schindler
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/europe-must-wake-up-to-china-threat-warns-ex-spy-chief-gerhard-schindler-7v8z7x69t
*********************************
每日更新專屬內容嘅Patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/goodbyehkhellouk
最新:
是誰令BNO Visa持有人同家屬讀敏感科目要申請?
https://bit.ly/3dWz53U
英國內政部提交國會嘅Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules,裡面關於BNO Visa嘅條文中需要注意嘅條文分享
https://bit.ly/37yyRhW
「鬥唔眨眼」EU眨先,脫歐貿易談判24小時內重開
https://bit.ly/2IThKxg
「有KOL話BNO Holder去英國生, BB會自動成為BC, 是真得嗎?」
https://bit.ly/3k9D5QG
另一個成人融入新環境嘅難題:移民英國後嘅社交挑戰
https://bit.ly/31fyjK7
搞清楚BNO Visa同"Hong Kong Bill"嘅分別與英國嘅立法程序
https://bit.ly/31fHHx6
認真討論到底依家脫歐進展搞緊乜:
脫歐最後階段嘅貿易談判,究竟雙方「卡」住响邊度?
https://bit.ly/2IAKKtn
*********************************
dominant strategy 在 渾水財經Channel Facebook 的最佳貼文
補充一下Nic的講法,費事分享時會把我的Caption流失,所以截圖處理。
原post: https://www.facebook.com/100006926802159/posts/2649512455289622/?extid=aE1veq7qLfgKVetM&d=n
12人在大陸送審是一個死局。
現在流行一種講法,大概是說不應該鬧上國際,而是應該找建制派低調處理,暗渡陳倉,顧全中央面子找下台階讓他們把12人運落嚟香港受審
沒有用的,這只是協助開啟另一次潘朵拉的盒子,而這一次跟上一次不會一樣,今次再開盒,結果只會更加災難性。上一次弄出了送中,今次如果真的相信建制幫到手的話,只會衍生另一次大災難
反對派喺呢件事上面接近無能為力,但建制實在太奸詐,推上國際是死局,走另一套方法也是死局,因為人質已經在對家手上。
這算是博弈論的dominant strategy,不論結果係點,這都是局限下最好的策略,雖然都係幫唔到個12個人。我唔想販賣同情或者比假希望人,所以係呢件事上面我唔講太多,就係咁解
渾水財經Channel x Fortune Insight 獨家眾籌出版《港斃。港完:國際金融中心崩壞史》率先網上預訂:https://muddywater.fortuneinsight.com/web/
你的支持,將會在香港金融史上烙下痕跡。
至於想知多點制裁對國際金融、香港個市的影響,可以訂閱我
➡️Water Podcast:由周庭講到鄭若驊安樂工程縮沙的歷史路徑和政治含意,另分析二級制裁的可怕之處,為何中資也不做11制裁人的生意?
https://www.patreon.com/posts/40374408
➡️Water Podcast:我投機壹傳媒的自白。為何買入=支持,當中的風險是什麼?從基本財經原理折解坊間謬誤
https://prime.fortuneinsight.com/web/posts/487901
➡️ Water Podcast:制裁特備 – 全世界都錯解鄭若驊和安樂工程的關係,由IPO文件、披露權益、信托概念和實際操作講整體制裁格局。留名睇核數師和往來銀行跳船
https://prime.fortuneinsight.com/web/posts/487798
➡️Water Podcast:黎智英被捉,台港本位不同竟會得出不同結果。總辭討論清晰乏味,解讀各方割蓆和解圍更有意義
https://www.patreon.com/posts/40554028
掌握最新最精闢金融經濟資訊,立即訂閱《金融經濟精神食糧》
逢一、三、四出刊登專業財金分析文章,另設特別環節:每週解答觀眾問題、100萬模擬倉投資部署和每日金融財經Podcast,幫你補補腦
https://prime.fortuneinsight.com/web/muddydirtywater
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/muddywaterfinance
dominant strategy 在 2.2 Dominated Strategies - Introduction to Game Theory: a ... 的推薦與評價
Consider the zero-sum game with payoff matrix in Table 2.2.2. Note that for simplicity our payoff matrix contains only the payoffs and not the strategy names; ... ... <看更多>